Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
The Scientific World Journal
Volume 2014, Article ID 282939, 8 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/282939
Research Article

A Full Ranking for Decision Making Units Using Ideal and Anti-Ideal Points in DEA

Department of Mathematics, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

Received 21 April 2014; Accepted 4 July 2014; Published 24 July 2014

Academic Editor: Mohsen Vaez-ghasemi

Copyright © 2014 A. Barzegarinegad et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. M. Farrell, “The measurement of productive efficiency,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society A, vol. 120, pp. 253–281, 1957. View at Google Scholar
  2. A. Charnes, W. W. Cooper, and E. Rhodes, “Measuring the efficiency of decision making units,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 429–444, 1978. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  3. R. G. Thompson, L. N. Langemeier, C. Lee, E. Lee, and R. M. Thrall, “The role of multiplier bounds in efficiency analysis with application to Kansas farming,” Journal of Econometrics, vol. 46, no. 1-2, pp. 93–108, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. Y. Roll, W. D. Cook, and B. Golany, “Controlling factor weights in data envelopment analysis,” IIE Transactions, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 2–9, 1991. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. Y. Roll and B. Golany, “Alternate methods of treating factor weights in DEA,” Omega, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 99–109, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. R. K. Mavi, S. Kazemi, and J. M. Jahangiri, “Developing common set of weights with considering nondiscretionary inputs and using ideal point method,” Journal of Applied Mathematics, vol. 2013, Article ID 906743, 9 pages, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  7. F. Hosseinzadeh Lotfi, G. R. Jahanshahloo, and A. Memariani, “A method for finding common set of weights by multiple objective programming in data envelopment analysis,” Southwest Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics, no. 1, pp. 44–54, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet
  8. G. R. Jahanshahloo, F. Hosseinzadeh Lotfi, and M. Moradi, “A DBA approach for fair allocation of common revenue,” Applied Mathematics and Computation, vol. 160, no. 3, pp. 719–724, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. P. Andersen and N. C. Petersen, “A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis,” Management Science, vol. 39, pp. 1261–1264, 1993. View at Google Scholar
  10. S. Mehrabian, M. R. Alirezaee, and G. R. Jahanshahloo, “A complete efficiency ranking of decision making units in data envelopment analysis,” Computational Optimization and Applications, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 261–266, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  11. T. R. Sexton, R. H. Silkman, and A. J. Hogan, “Data envelopment analy sis: critique and extensions,” in Measuring Efficiency: An Assessment of Data Envelopment Analysis, H. R. Silkman, Ed., pp. 73–105, Jossey Bass, San Francisco, Calif, USA, 1986. View at Google Scholar
  12. J. Wu, J. Sun, L. Liang, and Y. Zha, “Determination of weights for ultimate cross efficiency using Shannon entropy,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 5162–5165, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. G. R. Jahanshahloo, M. Khodabakhshi, F. Hosseinzadeh Lotfi, and M. R. Moazami Goudarzi, “A cross-efficiency model based on super-efficiency for ranking units through the TOPSIS approach and its extension to the interval case,” Mathematical and Computer Modelling, vol. 53, no. 9-10, pp. 1946–1955, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  14. G. R. Jahanshahloo, F. H. Lotfi, Y. Jafari, and R. Maddahi, “Selecting symmetric weights as a secondary goal in {DEA} cross-efficiency evaluation,” Applied Mathematical Modelling, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 544–549, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  15. Y.-M. Wang, K.-S. Chin, and Y. Luo, “Cross-efficiency evaluation based on ideal and anti-ideal decision making units,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 38, no. 8, pp. 10312–10319, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. A. M. Torgersen, F. R. Førsund, and S. A. C. Kittelsen, “Slack-adjusted efficiency measures and ranking of efficient units,” Journal of Productivity Analysis, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 379–398, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. T. Sueyoshi, “DEA non-parametric ranking test and index measurement: slack-adjusted DEA and an application to Japanese agriculture cooperatives,” Omega, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 315–326, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. W. Lu and S. Lo, “An interactive benchmark model ranking performers: application to financial holding companies,” Mathematical and Computer Modelling, vol. 49, no. 1-2, pp. 172–179, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  19. J. X. Chen and M. Deng, “A cross-dependence based ranking system for efficient and inefficient units in DEA,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 38, no. 8, pp. 9648–9655, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. Y. Wang, Y. Luo, and Y. Lan, “Common weights for fully ranking decision making units by regression analysis,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 38, no. 8, pp. 9122–9128, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. F. Hosseinzadeh Lotfi, G. R. Jahanshahloo, M. Khodabakhshi, M. Rostamy-Malkhlifeh, Z. Moghaddas, and M. Vaez-Ghasemi, “A review of ranking models in data envelopment analysis,” Journal of Applied Mathematics, vol. 2013, Article ID 492421, 20 pages, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. W. D. Cook, Y. Roll, and A. Kazakov, “A DEA model for measuring the relative efficiency of highway maintenance patrols,” INFOR, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 113–124, 1990. View at Google Scholar
  23. A. Davoodi and H. Z. Rezai, “Common set of weights in data envelopment analysis: a linear programming problem,” Central European Journal of Operations Research, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 355–365, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  24. M. S. Bazaraa and C. M. Shetty, Nonlinear Programming Theory and Algorithms, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 1979. View at MathSciNet
  25. M. Bazaraa and C. M. Shetty, Linear Programming and Network Flows, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 1990.
  26. J. Shang and T. Sueyoshi, “A unified framework for the selection of a fexible manufacturing system,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 85, no. 2, pp. 297–315, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. C. Kao and H.-T. Hung, “Data envelopment analysis with common weights: the compromise solution approach,” Journal of the Operational Research Society, vol. 56, no. 10, pp. 1196–1203, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. G. R. Jahanshahloo, F. Hosseinzadeh Lotfi, V. Rezaie, and M. Khanmohammadi, “Ranking DMUs by ideal points with interval data in DEA,” Applied Mathematical Modelling, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 218–229, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus