Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
The Scientific World Journal
Volume 2014, Article ID 537813, 23 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/537813
Research Article

Mathematical Analysis of the Effect of Rotor Geometry on Cup Anemometer Response

1Instituto Universitario de Microgravedad “Ignacio Da Riva” (IDR/UPM), Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, ETS de Ingeniería Aeronáutica y del Espacio, Plaza del Cardenal Cisneros 3, 28040 Madrid, Spain
2Departamento de Infraestructura, Sistemas Aeroespaciales y Aeropuertos, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, ETS de Ingeniería Aeronáutica y del Espacio, Plaza del Cardenal Cisneros 3, 28040 Madrid, Spain

Received 5 March 2014; Accepted 30 April 2014; Published 3 July 2014

Academic Editor: Ramaswami Balachandar

Copyright © 2014 Ángel Sanz-Andrés et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. M. A. Lackner, A. L. Rogers, and J. F. Manwell, “Uncertainty analysis in wind resource assessment and wind energy production estimation,” in Proceedings of the 45th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, pp. 1–16, AAIA, January 2007. View at Scopus
  2. R. V. Coquilla, J. Obermeier, and B. R. White, “Calibration procedures and uncertainty in wind power anemometers,” Wind Engineering, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 303–316, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. L. Kristensen, “Can a cup anemometer 'underspeed'? A heretical question,” Boundary-Layer Meteorology, vol. 103, no. 1, pp. 163–172, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. S. Pindado, J. Cubas, and A. Sanz-Andrés, “Aerodynamic analysis of cup anemometers performance: the stationary harmonic response,” The Scientific World Journal, vol. 2013, Article ID 197325, 11 pages, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. International Electrotechnical Commision, International Standard IEC-61400-12-1. Wind Turbines. Part 12-1: Power Performance Measurements of Electricity Producing Wind Turbines, 2005-12, 1st edition, 2005.
  6. A. Albers and H. Klug, “Open field cup anemometry,” DEWI Magazin, vol. 19, pp. 53–58, 2001. View at Google Scholar
  7. A. Albers, H. Klug, and D. Westermann, “Outdoor comparison of cup anemometers,” DEWI Magazin, vol. 17, pp. 5–15, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  8. J.-Å. Dahlberg, J. Gustavsson, G. Ronsten, T. F. Pedersen, U. S. Paulsen, and D. Westermann, Development of a Standardised Cup Anemometer suited to Wind Energy Applications—(Classcup), 2001.
  9. J.-Å. Dahlberg, T. F. Pedersen, and P. Busche, “ACCUWIND—methods for classification of cup anemometers,” Tech. Rep., Risø-R-1555(EN), Roskilde, Denmark, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  10. T. F. Pedersen, “Development of a classification system for cup anemometers—CLASSCUP,” Tech. Rep., Risø-R-1348(EN), Roskilde, Denmark, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  11. E. I. Kaganov and A. M. Yaglom, “Errors in wind-speed measurements by rotation anemometers,” Boundary-Layer Meteorology, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 15–34, 1976. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. Y. P. Solov'ev, A. I. Korovushkin, and Y. N. Toloknov, “Characteristics of a cup anemometer and a procedure of measuring the wind velocity,” Physical Oceanography, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 173–186, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. J. C. Wyngaard, J. T. Bauman, and R. A. Lynch, “Cup anemometer dynamics,” Flow: Its Measurement and Control in Science and Industry, vol. 1, pp. 701–708, 1974. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. J. C. Wyngaard, “Cup, propeller, vane, and sonic anemometers in turbulence research,” Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, vol. 13, pp. 399–423, 1981. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. P. Hyson, “Cup anemometer response to fluctuating wind speeds,” Journal of Applied Meteorology, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 843–848, 1972. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. P. A. Coppin, “An examination of cup anemometer overspeeding,” Meteorologische Rundschau, vol. 35, pp. 1–11, 1982. View at Google Scholar
  17. S. Chang and P. Frenzen, “Further consideration of Hayashi's ‘Dynamic response of a cup anemometer’,” Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 184–186, 1990. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. N. E. Busch and L. Kristensen, “Cup anemometer overspeeding,” Journal of Applied Meteorology, vol. 15, pp. 1328–1332, 1976. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. L. Kristensen, “Cup anemometer behavior in turbulent environments,” Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 5–17, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. S. Pindado, E. Vega, A. Martínez, E. Meseguer, S. Franchini, and I. P. Sarasola, “Analysis of calibration results from cup and propeller anemometers. Influence on wind turbine Annual Energy Production (AEP) calculations,” Wind Energy, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 119–132, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. S. Pindado, J. Pérez, and S. Avila-Sanchez, “On cup anemometer rotor aerodynamics,” Sensors, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 6198–6217, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. S. Pindado, I. Pérez, and M. Aguado, “Fourier analysis of the aerodynamic behavior of cup anemometers,” Measurement Science and Technology, vol. 24, no. 6, Article ID 065802, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. S. Ramachandran, “A theoretical study of cup and vane anemometers,” Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, vol. 95, pp. 163–180, 1969. View at Google Scholar
  24. J. Kondo, G. I. Naito, and Y. Fujinawa, “Response of cup anemometer in turbulence,” Journal of the Meteorological Society of Japan, vol. 49, pp. 63–74, 1971. View at Google Scholar
  25. MEASNET, Anemometer Calibration Procedure, Version 2, 2009.
  26. MEASNET, Cup Anemometer Calibration Procedure, Version 1, 1997.
  27. M. J. Brevoort and U. T. Joyner, “Experimental investigation of the Robinson-type cup anemometer,” NACA TN-513, 1935. View at Google Scholar
  28. O. Schrenk, “Über die trägheitsfehler des schalenkreuz-anemometers bei schwankender windstärke,” Zeitschrift für Technische Physik, vol. 10, pp. 57–66, 1929. View at Google Scholar
  29. H.-J. Winkel, M. Paschen, and M. Jensch, “Investigations of a cup anemometer in oblique flow for measurement of wind velocity in offshore installations in the field of aquaculture,” in Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering (OMAE '07), pp. 715–720, June 2007. View at Scopus
  30. M. Potsdam, L. Cicolani, B. Gassaway, and D. Mattle, “Aerodynamic analysis and flight simulation of an anemometer for rotational stabilization of a helicopter slung load,” in Proceedings of the 31st AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, pp. 1–22, San Diego, Calif, USA, 2013.
  31. J. Patterson, “The cup anemometer,” Transactions of the Royal Society of Canada Series III, vol. 20, pp. 1–54, 1926. View at Google Scholar
  32. R. M. Pinkerton, “Calibration and lag of a Friez type cup anemometer,” NACA TN-341, 1930. View at Google Scholar
  33. J. Hubbard and G. Brescoll, “Aerodynamic investigation of a cup anemometer,” NACA TN-502, 1934. View at Google Scholar
  34. S. P. Fergusson, Harvard Meteorological Studies No. 4. Experimental Studies of Cup Anemometers, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass, USA, 1939.
  35. J. G. Albright and G. E. Klein, “The sensitivity of anemometer cups,” Ohio Journal of Science, vol. 41, pp. 70–78, 1941. View at Google Scholar
  36. L. J. Fritschen, “A sensitive cup-type anemometer,” Journal of Applied Meteorology, vol. 6, pp. 695–698, 1967. View at Google Scholar
  37. D. Lindley, “The design and performance of a 6-cup anemometer,” Journal of Applied Meteorology, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 1135–1145, 1975. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. T. J. Lockhart, “Some cup anemometer testing methods,” Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 680–683, 1985. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. T. F. Pedersen and U. S. Paulsen, “Classification of operational characteristics of commercial cup-anemometers,” in Proceedings of the European Wind Energy Conference (EWEC '99), pp. 611–615, Nice, France, 1999.
  40. R. S. Hunter, B. M. Petersen, T. F. Pedersen et al., Recommended Practices for Wind Turbine Testing and Evaluation. 11-Wind Speed Measurement and Use of Cup Anemometry, 2003.
  41. F. J. Scrase and P. A. Sheppard, “The errors of cup anemometers in fluctuating winds,” Journal of Scientific Instruments, vol. 21, no. 9, article 304, pp. 160–161, 1944. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. M. Sanuki, “Experiments of the start and stop of windmill and cup anemometers with particular reference to their over-estimation factors,” Papers in Meteorology and Geophysics, vol. 3, pp. 41–53, 1952. View at Google Scholar
  43. S. Ramachandran, “A theoretical study of cup and vane anemometers—part II,” Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, vol. 96, pp. 115–123, 1969. View at Google Scholar
  44. V. Y. Torochkov and D. Y. Surazhskiy, “Measuring average wind speed,” Foreign Technology Division/Wright Patterson AFB FTD-HT-23-341-69, 1969. View at Google Scholar
  45. D. T. Acheson, “Response of cup and propeller rotors and wind direction vanes to turbulent wind fields,” Meteorological Monographs, vol. 11, pp. 252–261, 1970. View at Google Scholar
  46. N. E. Busch, O. Christensen, L. Kristensen, L. Lading, and S. E. Larsen, “Cups, vanes, propellers, and laser anemometers,” in Air-Sea Interaction: Instruments and Methods, F. Dobson, L. Hasse, and R. Davis, Eds., Plenum Press, New York, NY, USA, 1980. View at Google Scholar
  47. T. Hayashi, “Dynamic response of a cup anemometer,” Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 281–287, 1987. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. P. Frenzen, “Fast response cup anemometers for atmospheric turbulence research,” in Proceedings of the 8th Symposium on Turbulence and Diffusion, pp. 112–115, American Meteorological Society, 1988.
  49. J. T. Snow, D. E. Lund, M. D. Conner, S. B. Harley, and C. B. Pedigo, “The dynamic response of a wind measuring system,” Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 140–146, 1989. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. R. S. Hunter, “The accuracy of cup anemometer calibration with particular regard to testing wind turbines,” Wind Engineering, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 32–43, 1990. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. Skarstein Ø, A. Collins, and R. Hunter, “Improved dynamic response of cup anemometers using a simple real time recursive algorithm,” in Proceedings of the Wind Energy Technology and Implementation (EWEC '91), F. J. L. Van Hulle, P. T. Smulders, and J. B. Dragt, Eds., pp. 802–806, Elsevier Science, 1992.
  52. L. Kristensen, “The cup anemometer and other exciting instruments,” Tech. Rep., Risø-R-615 (EN), Roskilde, Denmark, 1993. View at Google Scholar
  53. L. Kristensen, “Cups, Props and Vanes,” Tech. Rep., Risø-R-766 (EN), Roskilde, Denmark, 1994. View at Google Scholar
  54. O. Fabian, Fly-Wheel Calibration of Cup-Anemometers. Risø-R-797(EN): Contributions From the Department of Meteorology and Wind Energy to the EWEC '94 Conference in Thessaloniki, Greece, 1995.
  55. D. Westermann, “Overspeeding—über das eigentümliche Tiefpaßverhalten von Schalensternanemometern: overspeeding measurements of cup anemometers,” DEWI Magazin, pp. 56–63, 1996. View at Google Scholar
  56. T. S. Hristov, S. D. Miller, and C. A. Friehe, “Linear time-invariant compensation of cup anemometer and vane inertia,” Boundary-Layer Meteorology, vol. 97, no. 2, pp. 293–307, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  57. L. Kristensen, “Measuring higher-order moments with a cup anemometer,” Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, vol. 17, no. 8, pp. 1139–1148, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  58. L. Kristensen and O. F. Hansen, “Distance constant of the risø cup anemometer,” Tech. Rep., Risø-R-1320(EN), Roskilde, Denmark, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  59. L. Kristensen, O. F. Hansen, and J. Højstrup, “Sampling bias on cup anemometer mean winds,” Wind Energy, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 321–331, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  60. T. F. Pedersen, “Characterisation and classification of RISØ P2546 cup anemometer,” Tech. Rep., Risø-R-1364 (ed. 2) (EN), Roskilde, Denmark, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  61. S. Yahaya and J. P. Frangi, “Cup anemometer response to the wind turbulence—measurement of the horizontal wind variance,” Annales Geophysicae, vol. 22, no. 10, pp. 3363–3374, 2004. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  62. L. Kristensen and O. F. Hansen, Bias on Horizontal Mean-Wind Speed and Variance Caused by Turbulence Presentation of Main Result, 2005.
  63. A. Bégin-Drolet, J. Ruel, and J. Lemay, “Off-axis characterization of ice-free anemometers,” Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, vol. 99, no. 8, pp. 825–832, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  64. A. Bégin-Drolet, J. Lemay, and J. Ruel, “Time domain modeling of cup anemometers using artificial neural networks,” Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, vol. 33, pp. 10–27, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  65. M. C.-E. Brazier, “Sur la comparabilité des anémomètres,” Comptes Rendus de l'Académie des Sciences, vol. 172, pp. 843–845, 1921. View at Google Scholar
  66. C. F. Marvin, “A rational theory of the cup anemometer,” Monthly Weather Review, vol. 60, pp. 43–56, 1932. View at Google Scholar
  67. C. F. Marvin, “Recent advances in anemometry,” Monthly Weather Review, vol. 62, pp. 115–120, 1934. View at Google Scholar
  68. A. F. Spilhaus and C. Rossby, “Analysis of the cup anemometer,” Meteorological Course. Professional Notes 7, 1934. View at Google Scholar
  69. E. L. Deacon, “The over-estimation error of cup anemometers in fluctuating winds,” Journal of Scientific Instruments, vol. 28, no. 8, article 303, pp. 231–234, 1951. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  70. P. B. MacCready Jr., “Mean wind speed measurements in turbulence,” Journal of Applied Meteorology, vol. 5, pp. 219–225, 1966. View at Google Scholar
  71. A. B. Bernstein, “A note on the use of cup anemometers in wind profile experiments,” Journal of Applied Meteorology, vol. 6, pp. 280–286, 1967. View at Google Scholar
  72. Y. Izumi and M. L. Barad, “Wind speeds as measured by cup and sonic anemometers and influenced by tower structure,” Journal of Applied Meteorology, vol. 9, pp. 851–856, 1970. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  73. D. W. Camp, R. E. Turner, and L. P. Gilchrist, “Response tests of cup, vane, and propeller wind sensors,” NASA TM X-64522, 1970. View at Google Scholar
  74. D. Lindley and A. J. Bowen, “The response of cup and propeller anemometers to fluctuating wind speeds,” in Proceedings of the 5th Australasian Conference on Hydraulics and Fluid Mechanics, vol. 1, pp. 269–277, 1974.
  75. H. W. Baynton, “Errors in wind run estimates from rotational anemometers,” Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, vol. 57, no. 9, pp. 1127–1131, 1976. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  76. V. R. Morris, J. C. Barnard, L. L. Wendell, and S. D. Tomich, “Comparison of anemometers for turbulence characterization,” Tech. Rep. PNL-SA-21321, CONF-921049-6, 1992. View at Google Scholar
  77. T. F. Pedersen, J.-Å. Dahlberg, and P. Busche, “ACCUWIND—classification of five cup anemometers according to IEC61400-12-1,” Tech. Rep., Risø-R-1556(EN), Roskilde, Denmark, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  78. D. Siegel and J. Lee, “An auto-associative residual processing and K-means clustering approach for anemometer health assessment,” International Journal of Prognostics and Health Management, vol. 2, pp. 50–61, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  79. J. Cassity, C. Aven, and D. Parker, “Applying weibull distribution and discriminant function techniques to predict damaged cup anemometers in the 2011 PHM competition,” International Journal of Prognostics and Health Management, vol. 3, pp. 1–7, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  80. L. Sun, C. Chen, and Q. Cheng, “Feature extraction and pattern identification for anemometer condition diagnosis,” International Journal of Prognostics and Health Management, vol. 3, pp. 8–18, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  81. M. Zlatanovic and V. Zlatanovic, “Long term operation characteristics of NRG #40 cup anemometers,” in Proceedings of the EWEA Annual Event, pp. 1–10, EWEA, 2012.
  82. S. Pindado, A. Barrero-Gil, and A. Sanz, “Cup anemometers' loss of performance due to ageing processes, and its effect on annual energy production (AEP) estimates,” Energies, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 1664–1685, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  83. J. Wieringa, “A revaluation of the Kansas mast influence on measurements of stress and cup anemometer overspeeding,” Boundary-Layer Meteorology, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 411–430, 1980. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  84. J. C. Wyngaard, J. A. Businger, J. C. Kaimal, and S. E. Larsen, “Comments on 'a revaluation of the Kansas mast influence on measurements of stress and cup anemometer overspeeding',” Boundary-Layer Meteorology, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 245–250, 1982. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  85. C. J. Moore, “Frequency response corrections for eddy correlation systems,” Boundary-Layer Meteorology, vol. 37, no. 1-2, pp. 17–35, 1986. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  86. P. R. Ebert, D. H. Wood, and S. F. Graebe, “Correcting measurements from a cup anemometer and wind vane,” in Proceedings of the 12th Australasian Fluid Mechanics Conference, pp. 375–378, Sydney, Australia, 1995.
  87. J. C. Barnard, L. L. Wendell, and V. R. Morris, “Optimal filtering of AC output anemometers,” Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 1261–1271, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  88. M. G. Selyaninov, “Dynamic error of rotating flow-rate transducer,” Measurement Techniques, vol. 47, no. 6, pp. 571–577, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  89. F.-U. Dentler, “The effect of rainfall on measurements of mean wind speed with cup anemometers in the surface layer at sea,” Boundary-Layer Meteorology, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 123–130, 1978. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  90. G. Fortin, J. Perron, and A. Ilinca, “Behaviour and modeling of cup anemometers under Icing conditions,” in Proceedings of the 11th International Workshop on Atmospheric Icing of Structures, Montréal, Canada, 2005.
  91. E. M. Gates and W. C. Thompson, “Simulated atmospheric rime icing of some wind speed sensors,” Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 273–282, 1986. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  92. S. Kimura, K. Abe, K. Tsuboi, B. Tammelin, and K. Suzuki, “Aerodynamic characteristics of an iced cup-shaped body,” Cold Regions Science and Technology, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 45–58, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  93. L. Makkonen, P. Lehtonen, and L. Helle, “Anemometry in icing conditions,” Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, vol. 18, no. 9, pp. 1457–1469, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  94. S. Pindado, A. Sanz, and A. Wery, “Deviation of cup and propeller anemometer calibration results with air density,” Energies, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 683–701, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  95. M. Hobby, M. Gascoyne, J. H. Marsham et al., “The fennec automatic weather station (AWS) network: monitoring the saharan climate system,” Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 709–724, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  96. J. C. Wyngaard, “The effects of probe-induced flow distortion of atmospheric turbulence measurements,” Journal of Applied Meteorology, vol. 20, no. 7, pp. 784–794, 1981. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  97. M. O. L. Hansen and B. M. Pedersen, “Influence of the meteorology mast on a cup anemometer,” Journal of Solar Energy Engineering, vol. 121, no. 2, pp. 128–131, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  98. W. D. Lubitz, “Effects of tower shadowing on anemometer data,” in Proceedings of the 11th Americas Conference on Wind Engineering, San Juan, Puerto Rico, June 2009. View at Scopus
  99. W. V. Burt, “A comparison of the responses of identical cup anemometersmounted on a spar and a toroid buoy,” Journal of Physical Oceanography, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 789–792, 1975. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  100. B. M. Pedersen, K. S. Hansen, S. Øye, M. Brinch, and O. Fabian, “Some experimental investigations on the influence of the mounting arrangements on the accuracy of cup-anemometer measurements,” Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, vol. 39, no. 1–3, pp. 373–383, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  101. S. Orlando, A. Bale, and D. A. Johnson, “Experimental study of the effect of tower shadow on anemometer readings,” Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, vol. 99, no. 1, pp. 1–6, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  102. R. N. Farrugia and T. Sant, “Modelling wind speeds for cup anemometers mounted on opposite sides of a lattice tower: a case study,” Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, vol. 115, pp. 173–183, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  103. L. Kristensen, M. Casanova, M. S. Courtney, and I. Troen, “In search of a gust definition,” Boundary-Layer Meteorology, vol. 55, no. 1-2, pp. 91–107, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  104. D. W. Camp, “Preliminary results of anemometer comparison tests,” Tech. Rep., NASA TM X-53451, 1966. View at Google Scholar
  105. E. L. Petersen, N. G. Mortensen, L. Landberg, J. Hùjstrup, and H. P. Frank, “Wind power meteorology. Part II: siting and models,” Wind Energy, vol. 1, pp. 55–72, 1998. View at Google Scholar
  106. K. H. Papadopoulos, N. C. Stefantos, U. S. Paulsen, and E. Morfiadakis, “Effects of turbulence and flow inclination on the performance of cup anemometers in the field,” Boundary-Layer Meteorology, vol. 101, no. 1, pp. 77–107, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  107. R. S. Hunter, T. F. Pedersen, P. Dunbabin et al., “European wind turbine testing procedure developments task 1: measurement method to verify wind turbine performance characteristics,” Tech. Rep., Risø-R-1209(EN), Roskilde, Denmark, 2001. View at Google Scholar
  108. U. S. Paulsen, N. G. Mortensen, J. C. Hansen, U. S. Said, and A. A. E.-S. Moussa, “Field calibration of cup anemometers,” in Proceedings of the European Wind Energy Conference and Exhibition (EWEC '07), pp. 7–10, Milan, Italy, 2007. View at Scopus
  109. R. Wagner, M. Courtney, J. Gottschall, and P. Lindelöw-Marsden, “Accounting for the speed shear in wind turbine power performance measurement,” Wind Energy, vol. 14, no. 8, pp. 993–1004, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  110. S. Lang and E. McKeogh, “LIDAR and SODAR measurements of wind speed and direction in upland terrain for wind energy purposes,” Remote Sensing, vol. 3, no. 9, pp. 1871–1901, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  111. S. Bradley, “Aspects of the correlation between sodar and mast instrument winds,” Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, vol. 30, pp. 2241–2247, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  112. C. Hasager, D. Stein, M. Courtney et al., “Hub height ocean winds over the North Sea observed by the NORSEWInD lidar array: measuring techniques, quality control and data management,” Remote Sensing, vol. 5, pp. 4280–4303, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  113. J. Sanz Rodrigo, F. Borbón Guillén, P. Gómez Arranz, M. S. Courtney, R. Wagner, and E. Dupont, “Multi-site testing and evaluation of remote sensing instruments for wind energy applications,” Renewable Energy, vol. 53, pp. 200–210, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  114. T. R. Robinson, “On the determination of the constants of the cup anemometer by experiments with a whirling machine,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, vol. 169, pp. 777–822, 1878. View at Google Scholar
  115. T. R. Robinson, “On the determination of the constants of the cup anemometer by experiments with a whirling machine. Part II,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, vol. 171, pp. 1055–1070, 1880. View at Google Scholar
  116. M. C. Brazier -E, “Sur la variation des indications des anémomètres Robinson et Richard en fonction de l’inclinaison du vent,” Comptes rendus de l'Académie des sciences, vol. 170, pp. 610–612, 1920. View at Google Scholar
  117. F. López Peña and R. J. Duro, “A virtual instrument for automatic anemometer calibration with ANN based supervision,” IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 654–661, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  118. P. J. Eecen and M. De Noord, “Uncertainties in cup anemometer calibrations type A and type B uncertainties,” Tech. Rep., ECN-C—05-066, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  119. A. Piccato, R. Malvano, and P. G. Spazzini, “Metrological features of the rotating low-speed anemometer calibration facility at INRIM,” Metrologia, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 47–57, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  120. A. Piccato, P. G. Spazzini, and R. Malvano, “Cup anemometer calibration: effect of flow velocity distribution,” Metrologia, vol. 48, no. 5, article 015, pp. 343–351, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  121. R. V. Coquilla, “Calibration program for wind sensors in wind energy applications,” in Proceedings of the NCSL International Conference, 2012.
  122. T. J. Lockhart, “Anemometer performance determined by ASTM methods,” Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 160–169, 1987. View at Google Scholar
  123. L. Makkonen and L. Helle, “Calibration of anemometers-an uncertainty in wind energy resource assessment,” in Proceedings of the 5th European Wind Energy Association Conference (EWEA '94), pp. 273–278, 1994.
  124. ASTM International, Standard Test Method for Determining the Performance of a Cup Anemometer or Propeller Anemometer (ASTM D 5096-02), ASTM International, West Conshohocken, Pa, USA, 2002.
  125. J.-Å. Dahlberg, “An investigation of wind tunnel blockage effects on cup anemometer calibrations,” Tech. Rep., FOI-R-2006-SE, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  126. R. V. Coquilla and J. Obermeier, “Calibration speed range for rotating anemometers used in wind energy applications,” in Proceedings of the 46th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, pp. 2–7, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, January 2008. View at Scopus
  127. D. Westermann, N. Balaresque, and P. Busche, Systematic Deviation in Anemometer Calibration Due to Geometrical Interference, Deutsche WindGuard, Varel, Germany, 2011.
  128. O. F. Hansen, S. O. Hansen, and L. Kristensen, “Wind tunnel calibration of cup anemometers,” in Proceedings of the AWEA Wind Power Conference, pp. 1–22, Atlanta, Ga, USA, 2012.
  129. A. Gkanias and A. Katsanevakis, “Investigation of the wind tunnel blockage effect on cup anemometer calibration,” in Proceedings of the EWEA Conference, EWEA, 2012.
  130. G. A. McBean, “Instrument requirements for eddy correlation measurements,” Journal of Applied Meteorology, vol. 11, no. 7, pp. 1078–1084, 1972. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  131. P. A. Sheppard, D. T. Tribble, and J. R. Garratt, “Studies of turbulence in the surface layer over water (Lough Neagh). Part I. Instrumentation, programme, profiles,” Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, vol. 98, pp. 627–641, 1972. View at Google Scholar
  132. P. Frenzen, “Fast-response cup anemometer features cosine response,” Tech. Rep., AEC-NASA Tech Brief 68-10202, 1968. View at Google Scholar
  133. J. B. Wellman, “A folding rotating cup anemometer,” Jet Propulsion Laboratory, vol. 37–53, pp. 133–143, 1968. View at Google Scholar
  134. D. Mazzarella, “An inventory of specifications for wind measuring instruments,” Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, vol. 53, pp. 860–871, 1972. View at Google Scholar
  135. T. W. Choon, C. Prakash, L. E. Aik, and T. T. Hin, “Development of low wind speed anemometer,” International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology, vol. 2, pp. 39–42, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  136. S. Pindado and J. Cubas, “Some developments on cup anemometer aerodynamics,” Defect and Diffusion Forum, vol. 348, pp. 179–185, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  137. ENAC, “Anexo Técnico, Acreditación No 134/LC10. 095,” Instituto Universitario de Microgravedad, Ignacio da Riva, 2012, https://www.enac.es/documents/7020/67cfa73f-f539-4c13-8172-986daad8514a.