Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
The Scientific World Journal
Volume 2014, Article ID 593546, 14 pages
Research Article

Characterization of the algC Gene Expression Pattern in the Multidrug Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii AIIMS 7 and Correlation with Biofilm Development on Abiotic Surface

1Institute of Bioinformatics and Biotechnology, University of Pune, Pune 411 007, India
2Ispat General Hospital, SAIL, Rourkela 769 005, India
3Department of Biotechnology, Shivaji University, Kolhapur 416 004, India
4Structural Bioinformatics Unit, Department of Biochemistry, Shivaji University, Kolhapur 416 004, India
5Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University, Aurangabad 431 001, India

Received 30 July 2014; Revised 10 November 2014; Accepted 10 November 2014; Published 3 December 2014

Academic Editor: Jose Correa Basurto

Copyright © 2014 Praveen K. Sahu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


Relative quantification of algC gene expression was evaluated in the multidrug resistant strain Acinetobacter baumannii AIIMS 7 biofilm (3 to 96 h, on polystyrene surface) compared to the planktonic counterparts. Comparison revealed differential algC expression pattern with maximum 81.59-fold increase in biofilm cells versus 3.24-fold in planktonic cells (). Expression levels strongly correlated with specific biofilm stages (scale of 3 to 96 h), coinciding maximum at initial surface attachment stage (9 h) and biofilm maturation stage (48 h). Cloning, heterologous expression, and bioinformatics analyses indicated algC gene product as the bifunctional enzyme phosphomannomutase/phosphoglucomutase (PMM/PGM) of ∼53 kDa size, which augmented biofilms significantly in algC clones compared to controls (lacking algC gene), further localized by scanning electron microscopy. Moreover, molecular dynamics analysis on the three-dimensional structure of PMM/PGM (simulated up to 10 ns) revealed enzyme structure as stable and similar to that in P. aeruginosa (synthesis of alginate and lipopolysaccharide core) and involved in constitution of biofilm EPS (extracellular polymeric substances). Our observation on differential expression pattern of algC having strong correlation with important biofilm stages, scanning electron-microscopic evidence of biofilm augmentation taken together with predictive enzyme functions via molecular dynamic (MD) simulation, proposes a new basis of A. baumannii AIIMS 7 biofilm development on inanimate surfaces.

1. Introduction

In recent years, Acinetobacter baumannii has been listed as one of the most important nosocomial pathogens [13]. The pathogen has become a universal challenge to treatment, owing to its multidrug resistant (MDR) nature and a plethora of virulence attributes [2, 4, 5]. Associated mortality up to 30% is seen with A. baumannii infections [6], such as ventilator-associated pneumonia, bacteraemia, urinary tract infections, burn wound infections, endocarditis, secondary meningitis, and septicemia especially in intensive care units [1]. A. baumannii infection and colonization often involve biofilm formation [7] on either abiotic [8, 9] or biotic surfaces [10, 11]. Biofilm formation is a virulence trait in A. baumannii which is of multifactorial nature [4, 12]. The process of biofilm development in A. baumannii is a highly regulated process and could be the interplay of several genetic determinants [13]. The extracellular matrices of bacterial biofilm comprise of proteins, nucleic acids, and polysaccharides [14] which are often considered as ideal start-points to further investigation towards effective treatment measures against biofilm-associated pathogens, such as MDR A. baumannii.

Acinetobacter spp. and Pseudomonas aeruginosa together are known to be responsible for a significant proportion of nosocomial infections [15] with crude mortality rates of 30% to 75% in case of nosocomial pneumonia only [16]. In patients with cystic fibrosis, alginate production by P. aeruginosa is found to be associated with high morbidity and mortality [17, 18]. Production of alginate, an exopolysaccharide, is responsible for development of mucoid bacterial phenotype [17, 19] which is associated with biofilm formation in P. aeruginosa under iron limiting conditions [20]; although proportions of alginate in the extracellular polysaccharide/polymeric substances (EPS) of biofilm could vary significantly in strains like PA14 and PA01 of P. aeruginosa [21]. It acts as an intercellular material in complex biofilm structures and facilitates nonspecific attachment of bacteria to surfaces, thus increasing cohesion [22]. Biosynthesis of alginate is well characterized in P. aeruginosa [23, 24] and Escherichia coli [25]. The gene algC in P. aeruginosa codes for a crucial bifunctional enzyme phosphomannomutase/phosphoglucomutase (PMM/PGM), belonging to the α-D-hexomutase superfamily, synthesizing alginate and lipopolysaccharide (LPS) core, respectively [24, 26, 27]. The genetic regulation of algC gene in P. aeruginosa [23, 24, 28] could be dependent on surface attachment and other important factors.

Earlier study shows biofilm formation by clinical strains A. baumannii on abiotic surface (urinary catheters) as a major reason for device-related infections [29]. To explore the basis of persistence on such clinically important (abiotic) surfaces, we characterized the role of extracellular macromolecules like extracellular DNA (eDNA), a major component of the biofilm EPS matrix and evaluated its role in biofilm formation [9]. Besides eDNA, other extracellular macromolecules such as exopolysaccharides also play significant role in the constitution of the biofilm EPS. Recent findings on the EPS of A. baumannii indicate it as a universal protector from antibiotics like tobramycin [30] and one of its capsular polysaccharides (K1) being highly immunogenic and a potential therapeutic target via passive immunization [31]. The synthesis of specific exopolysaccharides like alginate and LPS core is well characterized in P. aeruginosa along with their involvement in biofilm formation as mentioned earlier; however, remains unclear in A. baumannii, which is a close relative and a globally important nosocomial pathogen. Presumably, the genetic basis of the association of exopolysaccharides such as alginate and LPS core with biofilm formation may exacerbate A. baumannii infections on clinically important surface, which can multiply the intrinsic antibiotic resistance and worsen the treatment scenario. However, there are no reports as yet, which describe the genetic association of algC with biofilm formation in A. baumannii. Therefore in this study, we set out to characterize the A. baumannii algC gene expression pattern during biofilm formation and its association with the biofilm development, which could further pave way for future research on potential drug target(s) for biofilm-associated infections caused by MDR A. baumannii.

In the current study, we identified the algC gene in the MDR strain of A. baumannii AIIMS 7 genome and characterized its quantitative gene expression patterns in growing biofilm cells compared to the planktonic cells using the relative quantification (ΔΔCt method) in real-time PCR. Gene expression pattern was correlated with specific stages of biofilm development. Molecular dynamics (MD) simulation was performed on the three dimensional (3D) structure of the gene product (enzyme PMM/PGM) to confirm the stability and to compare with that of P. aeruginosa, besides phylogenetic analysis. Subsequently, biofilm augmentation due to algC gene was evaluated using cloning and heterologous expression studies followed by scanning electron microscopy.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Bacterial Strains and Culture Conditions

Multidrug resistant clinical isolate of Acinetobacter baumannii (strain AIIMS 7) was used in this study, as described previously [9]. The bacterium was grown on CLED (cysteine-lactose electrolyte-deficient) agar and Luria Bertani (LB) broth (HiMedia, India). E. coli DH5α was used for the cloning and heterologous expression experiments. Clones were maintained on Luria agar plates containing 100 mg/L ampicillin.

2.2. Nucleic Acids Purification and PCR

Genomic DNA was purified using a DNA isolation kit (Sigma Aldrich, USA). Total RNA and plasmid purification was done using Trizol reagent (Invitrogen, USA) and GenElute plasmid extraction kit (Sigma Aldrich, USA) respectively, according to manufacturer’s instructions. Concentration and purity criteria of the nucleic acids were quantified in a BioPhotometer Plus (Eppendorf, Germany). Primers used for amplification of direct PCR for algC and RT-PCR of internal regions of algC are listed in Table 1. Primers were designed using Primer Quest (IDT, USA) and synthesized (Sigma Aldrich, USA). For amplification of the 1781 bp fragment algC from genomic DNA, PCR conditions used were initial denaturation of 5 min at 94°C, followed by 30 cycles of 30 sec at 94°C, 20 seconds at 54.5°C, and 45 seconds at 72°C with final extension of 5 minutes at 72°C. Amplification of algC was also verified with native plasmids as PCR template. PCR assays were performed in an ep-gradient PCR (Eppendorf, Germany); products were separated on agarose gels stained with ethidium bromide and documented in a gel documentation system (Alpha Imager HP, Alpha Innotech, USA). DNase-, RNase-, Protease-free water was used as negative control. All PCR chemicals and reagents were purchased from Sigma unless stated otherwise.

Table 1: Oligos/probes used for PCR, RT-PCR, and real-time PCR analysis.
2.3. Confirmation of Internal Regions of cDNA and DNA Sequencing

To confirm the transcription of algC, two internal regions of algC cDNA (1360 bp and 463 bp) were amplified using upstream primer 363F and CD1701R and internal nested primers 1260 nest1F and CD1701R, respectively (Table 1). Total RNA samples were treated with DNase I and then used in RT-PCR, which was performed using a single-step Reverse Transcription kit (Promega, USA). To test possible DNA contamination in RNA samples, direct PCR of total RNA without reverse transcription was performed. DNase-, RNase-, Protease-free water was used as negative control. RT-PCR was performed with one μL of cDNA template and 100 pm of primers. cDNA from E. coli DH5α with pGEM-3Zf (+) plasmid as empty vector (Applied Biosystem, USA) served as negative control. DNA sequencing was performed in the Applied Biosystems 3730 DNA Analyzer platform. Sequences were analyzed by sequence analysis software v5.1.1 (Applied Biosystems, USA) and assembled using software ContigExpress (Vector NTI Advance v11.5.0, Invitrogen). Promoter and the ribosome binding sites of algC were predicted using online tool Neural Network Promoter Prediction program (

2.4. Total RNA Extraction and cDNA Synthesis from Biofilm and Planktonic A. baumannii Cells

To compare gene expression pattern of algC in biofilm versus planktonic A. baumannii AIIMS 7, total RNA was extracted from cells growing in biofilm and planktonic mode and then real-time quantitative RT-PCR was performed. Biofilms were allowed to form in 6-well polystyrene plates (Tarsons, India) beginning at 3 hours up to 96 hours. A. baumannii AIIMS 7 cultures (106 CFU/mL, overnight grown) were inoculated onto the wells and diluted initially with sterile distilled water (without LB broth) at a dilution of 1 : 40. After incubation for 3 hours at 37°C under static conditions, the supernatant was discarded and fresh sterile nutrient medium (Luria broth) was added at a final dilution of 1 : 40 and then incubated under similar conditions to allow biofilm formation. After appropriate incubation(s), plates were taken out; nonadherent cells were aspirated and discarded after brief sonication. Plates containing biofilms were washed twice with phosphate buffer saline (PBS). Surface-attached bacteria (biofilm forming) were scraped off and total RNA was purified using Trizol reagent (Invitrogen, USA) as per manufacturer’s instructions. Similarly, total RNA was purified from planktonic cell culture at the corresponding time points (3–96 h). RNA samples were treated with DNase I (Sigma, USA). To test possible DNA contamination in RNA samples, direct PCR of total RNA without reverse transcription was done. cDNA was synthesized using Verso cDNA synthesis kit (Thermo, USA) as per manufacturer’s instructions. cDNA concentrations were determined using BioPhotometer Plus (Eppendorf, Germany).

2.5. Relative Quantification of algC Expression Pattern by Real-Time PCR

Specific primers and probes for algC gene along with 16SrRNA gene (endogenous control) were designed and synthesized as “assay-by-design” from Applied Biosystems as listed in Table 1. Prior to proceeding with relative quantification, the cDNA template of 24 hour old biofilm samples with 10-fold serial dilutions was used to analyze the standard curves of both algC and 16srRNA gene. Real-time PCR was performed in 10 μL reactions in 96-well PCR plates using 100 ng cDNA, 2X TaqMan gene expression master mix (Applied Biosystems, USA) and 20X algC assay mix (20X 16SrRNA assay mix in case of controls) in a 7500 fast real-time PCR system (Applied Biosystems, USA). The relative number of algC mRNA was determined using ΔΔCt-method (comparative threshold cycle) by normalizing Ct values of algC mRNA with that of 16srRNA in biofilm and planktonic samples at various time points from 3 to 96 hours. Relative quantification (RQ) represented in “fold over increase” was determined according to methods described elsewhere [32] and the formula used for calculation was RQ = . Cutoff Ct was kept 35, with an automatic threshold of 0.2 and baseline from cycle 3–15 with 95% confidence level. The 24-hour biofilm sample was set as the calibrator for this comparative gene expression analysis. Statistical comparison of RQ values (between biofilm and planktonic samples) was performed using Student’s -test and value <0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

2.6. Biofilm Development Assay

Biofilm development assays were performed to assess the pattern of biofilm formation of A. baumannii AIIMS 7 on polystyrene surface and for further correlation with gene expression plot over the same time line. Beginning at 3 h up to 96 h, quantitative biofilm assay was performed on 96-well microtitre plates, according to earlier methods [10] with appropriate modifications. Briefly, A. baumannii AIIMS 7 cultures (106 CFU/mL, overnight grown) were inoculated onto polystyrene microtitre wells of a 96-well plate (Tarsons, India) and diluted initially with sterile distilled water (no nutrient broth) at a dilution of 1 : 40. After a static incubation of 3 hours at 37°C, the supernatants were aspirated and then sterile LB broth was added to the wells with a final dilution of 1 : 40 with sterile LB broth. For all time points (3–96 h), this was repeated in order to allow A. baumannii cells to attach onto polystyrene initially but not to grow and then to substitute it with addition of fresh Luria broth to facilitate adherent and micro-aggregated cells to develop biofilms. All plates were incubated at 37°C under static conditions for biofilm development, including negative controls (no cells, only nutrient medium) for each test samples in the plate. After appropriate incubation period(s), plates were taken out and nonadherent and dead cells were removed by brief sonication and aspiration carefully. The wells were washed thrice with sterile PBS, dried, and stained with 0.1% Gentian Violet (HiMedia, India). Excessive stain was removed by submerging the plate in a water trough and then dried in laminar air flow followed by addition 200 μL of 100% ethanol for solubilizing the stained biofilm matrices. To measure the absorbance, plates were read in a Multi-Plate Reader (Molecular Devices, USA) at 570 nm before being shaken at 1020 rpm for 10 seconds. All biofilm development assays were performed in replicate of 12 and repeated. Absorbance values were termed as biofilm growth index after normalization with LB control, and values were plotted in Excel spreadsheets (Microsoft, USA) for further analysis.

2.7. Statistical Correlation of Biofilm Formation with algC Gene Expression

To find the concurrence of algC gene expression pattern with biofilm formation, RQ values (fold over increase in algC gene expression) in biofilm mode were correlated linearly with the biofilm indices at corresponding time points and correlation coefficients were determined using Excel spreadsheet (Microsoft, USA). Correlation statistics was restricted to three major stages, that is, initial attachment (3–9 hours), consolidation of the surface-attached micro-aggregation (12–24 hours), and maturation of biofilm (36–48 hours). 24-hour biofilm gene expression data (calibrator sample) was excluded from the correlation. value of <0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

2.8. Microscopic Examination of A. baumannii Biofilm Development

To localize the stages of biofilm growth over a temporal scale (3–96 h), biofilms were formed on sterile polystyrene culture dish, 55 mm × 15 mm (Tarsons, India), and incubated at 37°C under similar culture conditions as described above. After appropriate incubation periods, plates were taken out; supernatants were aspirated followed by washing three times with phosphate buffer saline for removal of nonadherent cells and fixed with 1 mL of methanol, air-dried, and observed without staining under a modular bright field microscope (Axioscope A1, Zeiss, Germany) with bright field settings at magnification of 100x.

2.9. Bioinformatics and Phylogenetic Analysis

Nucleotide and protein sequence comparisons were performed using BLASTn (National Center for Biotechnology Information, USA). Amino acid sequences were translated using Translate tool of the Expert Protein Analysis System (ExPASy, Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics). Protein sequences retrieved from NCBI were aligned using CLUSTALW [33] and phylogenetic tree was constructed with the help of analysis software MEGA v5.0 [34]. Bootstrapping was performed with 1,000 replicates for checking relative support for the branches in the phylogenetic tree. Comparison was restricted to sequences of close organisms, for example, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Pseudomonas putida, Pseudomonas syringae, and previously predicted PMM sequence from whole genome sequence of Acinetobacter baumannii strain AYE, Acinetobacter haemolyticus, and Acinetobacter calcoaceticus. Higher eukaryote sequences, for example, Oryctolagus cuniculus PGM isoform 1 and PMM from Homo sapiens, were also included for comparison.

2.10. Cloning and Heterologous Expression

Upstream primer (alg_118F) and downstream primer (alg_1897R) were used in a PCR program with an additional 15 min final extension for producing poly-A tails in the PCR products to aid while TA cloning. Amplified algC was purified using gel purification kit (Bangalore GeNei, India) and ligated into pGEMT-Easy vector (Promega, USA) to produce resultant recombinant plasmid pGEalgCA7. The plasmid was transformed into chemically competent E. coli DH5α. Colonies were picked and direct PCR was performed to confirm presence of algC gene.

2.11. Assessment of AlgC (PMM/PGM) Protein Expression

Mid-log phase grown (with 100 mg/L ampicillin in Luria broth, under shaking conditions) E. coli DH5α-pGEalgCA7 and E. coli DH5α-pGEM-3Zf(+) at OD 600 = 0.8 were used to prepare whole cell extracts. The cell extracts were analyzed by SDS-PAGE (12.5%) and protein bands were documented in a gel documentation system (Alpha Innotech) after staining with 0.2% Coomassie brilliant blue (Himedia).

2.12. Assessment of Biofilm Augmentation

Biofilm augmentation was visualized by scanning electron microscopy. Briefly, overnight grown cells (3 × 109 cells) were inoculated on (1 × 1 cm) sterile glass slides inside 12-well culture plates (Tarsons, India) and incubated at 37°C static. After 24 h of incubation, culture supernatant was removed; slides were immediately flooded with 2.5% glutaraldehyde in PBS and incubated at room temperature for 2 hours, followed by rinsing with sterile distilled water, and serially dehydrated with an ethanol gradient (25–100%), CO2-critical point dried and coated with platinum in an Auto Fine Coater (JFC-1600, JEOL, Japan). The slides were then observed in a scanning electron microscope (Vega, Tescan, USA) with 30 KV input voltage. For quantitative biofilm augmentation in the algC clones, biofilms were formed in microtitre plates and quantified as per methods described earlier [10].

2.13. Sequence Alignment and Building Model for PMM/PGM

PMM/PGM sequence of A. baumannii AIIMS 7 (AEC46864) was used as a target sequence in BLASTp program to identify possible template structures available in Protein Data Bank. The selected templates having good alignment score with the target sequence were aligned using CLUSTALW. Template protein structure 1K2Y.pdb (P. aeruginosa PMM/PGM S108A mutant), having maximum sequence alignment score (32%) with target sequence, was used as the final template to build homology model of PMM/PGM. Three-dimensional model of PMM/PGM was constructed using MODELLER 9 v7 [35] by considering 1K2Y.pdb as a template structure. The stability of the model was tested by using 10 ns molecular dynamics (MD) simulation.

2.14. Molecular Dynamics (MD) Simulation

MD simulations were performed on the homology model of PMM/PGM from A. baumannii AIIMS 7 in a HP workstation with the help of GROMACS 4.0.4 program using the GROMOS96 45a3 force field [36]. The structure was fully solvated with water (SPC) and system was neutralized with 9 Na+ ions. The solvated structure was minimized by steepest descent method for 1000 steps at 300 K temperature and constant pressure. The LINCS algorithm with 8.0 Å cutoffs was used for energy minimization of PMM/PGM whereas PME algorithm with 8.0 Å nonbonded cutoffs was utilized similarly as used in an earlier MD simulation study [37]. After equilibration period production MD was run for 10 ns at 300 K temperature, pressure, and constant volume ensemble. Solvent accessible surface (SA, Richards’ surface) and molecular surface (MS, Connolly’s surface) areas were calculated using CASTp analysis [38]. Structural comparison after molecular dynamics simulation of initial structure with final structure was done using PDBeFOLD software [39]. The MD simulation trajectory was then visualized using the VMD (visual molecular dynamics) package [40]. Three-dimensional images of enzyme PMM/PGM after MD simulation run were generated using the UCSF-Chimera tool [41] and Pymol (

2.15. Nucleotide Sequence Accession

The GenBank accession number for A. baumannii AIIMS 7 algC gene sequence is JF701279 and AEC46864 for the protein (PMM/PGM) sequence.

3. Results

3.1. Identification of algC Gene in A. baumannii AIIMS 7

PCR with genomic DNA yielded a fragment of 1781 bp (Supplementary Figure S1 in the Supplementary Material available online at PCR amplifications with plasmids were unsuccessful, confirming that the gene is not plasmid-borne. Reverse transcription PCR using total RNA showed amplification of internal coding regions 1 (1360 bp) and 2 (463 bp), which confirmed the active transcription of the algC ORF  (Supplementary Figure ). DNA sequence of the gene was analyzed to predict regulatory regions such as promoter, ribosomal binding site, translation start, and end, which were identified and annotated (Supplementary Figure ).

3.2. Elevated Levels of algC Gene Transcription during Biofilm Mode of Growth

Quantitative real-time PCR experiment showed significant variation in the threshold cycle (Ct) values in biofilm and planktonic mode of growth of A. baumannii, which described differential expressional patterns of the two modes of growth (Figure 1). Number of copies of algC mRNA were calculated using 16SrRNA gene as internal control at each time point (ΔCt). To evaluate the relative gene expression in biofilm and planktonic modes of growth over the temporal scale of 3 to 96 hours, the 24-hour biofilm sample was used as calibrator (ΔΔCt). Relative quantification (RQ) plot for gene expression at various time points from 3 to 96 hours showed low basal (almost linear) expression of algC in planktonic mode (maximum of 3.24-fold, 48 hours) whereas highly variable and elevated algC expression was seen in biofilm mode (maximum 81.59-fold, 48 hours) and displaying a definite pattern. The initial attachment stage (9 hours) and maturation stage (48 hours) of biofilm showed maximal expression of algC, which was in contrast and could be seen as steadily low expression at almost all time points in planktonic mode of growth (Figure 1). This observation affirms that the algC gene is highly up-regulated (at the transcription level) while the A. baumannii cells grow in a biofilm mode (i.e., attached to an abiotic surface) and follows a pattern as depicted (Figure 1); however in planktonic (free form, in a suspension, unattached to surface) the algC gene is transcribed at a basal rate.

Figure 1: Comparison of algC gene expression pattern in biofilm and planktonic A. baumannii AIIMS 7. Real-time quantitative PCR results showing relative quantification of algC gene expression levels (calculated according to ΔΔCt-method and represented as “fold over increase”) at corresponding time points. Expression levels were normalized with indigenous control (16SrRNA gene expression) in both biofilm and planktonic cells (calibrator: 24-hour biofilm sample, fold over increase = 1).
3.3. Biofilm Growth Pattern Correlates with Quantitative algC Gene Expression

Biofilm growth pattern A. baumannii on polystyrene surface can be seen in Figure 2, which can be explained in three distinct stages. First, an exponential rate of increase was observed at 3 to 9 hours, which defined the initial attachment and micro-colony aggregation stage (Figure 2). After 9 hour till 36 hours it showed steady level of increase in biofilm indices, indicating the consolidation stage of the attached micro-colonies and approaching maturation of biofilm. Third, maximum production of biofilm matrix could be seen at 36 to 48 hours, marking the maturation stage. Lastly, as like the plateau phase in the planktonic growth curve of A. baumannii AIIMS 7 (data not shown), the biofilm growth pattern also exhibited a steady state and persistent nature after maturation (after 48 hour till 96 hours). To find the association of algC gene expression pattern at transcription level (as revealed from real-time PCR analysis) with that of biofilm growth, correlation coefficients were determined using the RQ values in biofilm samples and biofilm indices at corresponding time points. High correlation was observed at all three major stages of biofilm. Correlation coefficients were 0.902, 0.925, and 0.983 () corresponding to initial attachment, consolidation of the surface-attached micro-aggregation, and maturation of biofilm stages. Correlation was found to be maximum (0.983, ) at stages where biofilms were mature. This indicated a strong possibility that transcription of algC could be in close association with biofilm formation, especially the maturation stage (36–48 hours) and also the initial attachment stage (3–9 hours).

Figure 2: Pattern of biofilm growth of A. baumannii AIIMS 7. Graph showing corresponding biofilm indices of biofilms formed on polystyrene microtitre surface, calculated after normalization with control and plotted versus representative time points (three to 96 h).
3.4. Microscopic Visualization of Biofilm Development

To visualize the growth pattern of biofilm, bright-field microscopy was performed on biofilms growing on polystyrene surface, which showed varied biofilm morphology at gradual time points (Figure 3) with a strong concurrence with quantitative evaluation of biofilm growth pattern (Figure 2, as described above). At initial attachment stages, planktonic cells were seen scantily aggregated (Figures 3(a) and 3(b)) but gradually the micro-aggregation on the surface increased, subsequently making completely attached micro-colonies at 9 h which could be seen clearly (Figure 3(c)). Further stages of growth (12, 18, and 24 h) showed consolidation of micro-colonies leading to stable structures of biofilm (Figures 3(d)3(f)). At 36–48 h, fully mature biofilm communities of A. baumannii were seen, enriched with thick EPS matrices (Figures 3(g) and 3(h)), followed by appearance of robust three-dimensional biofilm structures, which were found persistent till 72 and 96 h (Figures 3(i) and 3(j)). Overall, visualization of biofilm growth at developing stages was in tandem with the patterns of biofilm growth as well as algC gene expression.

Figure 3: (a)–(j) Microscopic visualization of A. baumannii AIIMS 7 biofilms. Representative bright field micrographs depicting static biofilms formed on polystyrene microtitre surface at respective time points (3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96 h) (magnification, 100x).
3.5. In Silico Analysis of Protein Reveals Highly Conserved Identity

To compare and evaluate the relatedness of A. baumannii AIIMS 7 algC encoded PMM/PGM, in silico analyses were performed. BLASTn results showed 100% similarity with the predicted PMM/PGM sequence in whole genome sequences of A. baumannii available in NCBI database. Alignment results also displayed significant similarity with PMM/PGM nucleotide sequences of other genera. 472 amino acid residues could be theoretically translated in one frame (5′–3′) of the DNA sequence. BLASTp showed similar results as in BLASTn alignment. The molecular weight of the protein was predicted to be 52.94 kDa with isoelectric point (pI) of 5.67. CLUSTALW alignment with selected bacterial and eukaryotic PMM/PGM sequences showed conserved regions in the protein as shown in Figure 4(a) (active site, Mg2+ binding site, and sugar binding site marked as colored rectangles) in the protein as shown. Figure 4(b) shows the phylogenetic tree indicating relatedness between PMM/PGM enzymes from pseudomonads and higher eukaryotes (rabbit and human). PMM/PGM sequence from A. baumannii had less than 25% identity with rabbit muscle PGM isoform 1, whereas it had a mere 10% identity with human PMM (Figure 4(b)).

Figure 4: (a)-(b) Multiple sequence alignment and phylogenetic relationship of PMM/PGM. (a) CLUSTALW analyses of PMM/PGM protein sequences displaying representative color of box which highlights conserved regions, that is, active site (red), Mg2+ binding site (green), and substrate binding site (blue). (b) Bootstrap consensus tree for PMM/PGM enzymes, constructed by MEGA v5.0 using the neighbor-joining (NJ) method (based on 1,000 replicates). Numbers on the nodes are bootstrap values and the bar represents scale of estimated evolutionary distance (20 substitutions at any amino acid position per 100 amino acid positions).
3.6. Assessment of Protein

To demonstrate the synthesis of PMM/PGM protein, whole cell extracts of cloned E. coli DH5α with resultant recombinant plasmid pGEalgCA7 cells were used in SDS-PAGE analysis, which showed a clearly overexpressed protein of ~53 kDa suggesting the PMM/PGM protein in question (Figure 5). Control E. coli DH5α (with empty vector pGEM-3Zf+ lacking an algC gene) did not show any PMM/PGM protein band.

Figure 5: SDS-PAGE analysis of AlgC (PMM/PGM) protein. Lane 1: whole cell extract of control E. coli DH5α (lacking algC gene); lane 2: whole cell extract of E. coli DH5α with algC gene showing the AlgC protein band ~53 kDa; lane M: standard protein molecular weight marker (kDa).
3.7. Biofilm Augmentation by algC after 24 h

Electron micrographs of biofilm formed by the algC clones (Figure 6) showed significant increase in biofilm formation compared to controls, probably indicative of the overexpression of the PMM/PGM protein and the resultant exopolysaccharides. Thicker biofilms could be seen in the algC clones having clear dense matrices (Figures 6(a), 6(c), and 6(e)) with a intracellular cementing material clearly visible (Figures 6(a) and 6(e)) indicative of the biofilm EPS. Overall SEM analysis at a gradient of magnifications and concurrent comparisons with control clones (lacking functional copy of algC) suggested substantially that there is significant facilitation of the overall biofilm formation, emphasizing the enrichment of the biofilm matrices, which could be due to the cohesive activity of EPS including alginate and LPS cores. The quantitative biofilm assay concurred with the microscopic analysis, with augmentation of biofilm up to 3.87-fold in the algC clones compared to the control cells lacking algC gene (, data not shown).

Figure 6: (a)–(h) Visualization of biofilm augmentation by scanning electron microscopy. Electron micrographs (a, c, e, g) showing biofilms formed by algC clones after 24 h, at a gradient of magnifications (Bar = 2 μm, 5 μm, 10 μm, and 20 μm; absolute magnifications indicated as Kx in the very picture) as observed under a scanning electron microscope. algC clones can be seen clearly producing dense and robust biofilm as suggested by the thickness and integrity of the biofilm matrices, compared to the control biofilms by E. coli DH5α (lacking A. baumannii algC gene) at corresponding comparable magnifications (b, d, f, h).
3.8. Molecular Dynamics Simulation Study of PMM/PGM

To predict the functional association between PMM/PGM enzyme (encoded by algC gene) resulting in alginate/LPS core mediated biofilm formation in A. baumannii, molecular dynamics (MD) simulations up to 10 ns were carried out on homology model of PMM/PGM of A. baumannii AIIMS 7 using GROMACS v4.0.4 program. The generated PMM/PGM model of A. baumannii AIIMS 7 contained four domains of equal size arranged in “heart shaped” manner (Figure 7(a)) which form a compact structure, similar to P. aeruginosa [42]. The polypeptide chain proceeds through each domain sequentially (Figure 7(a)) forming heart shaped geometry. Sequence alignments (Supplementary Figure ) and model building study showed that the active site was located at the centre of the two domains (domains 1 and 2) in a deep cleft formed by Ser104, Asp244, Asp246, and Asp248. PMM/PGM sequence of A. baumannii AIIMS 7 showed conserved sequence motif in domain 3 from residues 327-331 (GEYAGH) which would act as a sugar binding site. A cluster of positively charged conserved residues found in domain 3 (Lys287) and domain 4 (Arg427, Arg438) could be involved in phosphate binding. The cleft showed solvent accessible surface (SA, Richards’ surface) and molecular surface (MS, Connolly’s surface) areas as calculated by alpha shape method. The enzyme showed a total cavity of 3641.5 Å and spherical central cavity of 1878.13 Å where substrate could bind as shown in Figure 7(b). To compare the 3D structures obtained before and after MD simulations, structural superpositions were made using PDBeFOLD, results of which showed root mean square deviation (RMSD) of two aligned structures within the range of 2.51 Å (Figure 7(c)). Metal ion Mg2+ interacts with Asp244, Asp246, Asp248, and Ser104 residues (Figure 7(d); Supplementary Table ). The metal ion Mg2+ is required for enzymatic activity of PMM/PGM of A. baumannii AIIMS 7 (Figure 7(d)), rather than Mn2+ and Zn2+. Specific interactions between metal ion (Mg2+) and protein, water-mediated H-bonds (so-called water bridges), and hydrophobic (Lennard-Jones) interactions have been identified and are listed (Supplementary Table ).

Figure 7: (a)–(d) Molecular modeling of PMM/PGM from A. baumannii AIIMS 7. (a) Four sequential domains of enzyme PMM/PGM after MD simulation; (b) central spherical cavity showing solvent accessible surface area (orange). (c) Superimposed structures before MD (cyan) and after MD simulation (magenta); (d) Mg2+ interacting residues of PMM/PGM enzyme.
3.9. Stability of Phosphomannomutase during Simulation

To verify the simulation stability and to measure structure and dynamics of PMM/PGM model of A. baumannii AIIMS 7, standard structural parameters like RMSD, root mean square fluctuation (RMSF), and radius of gyration (RG) were calculated and represented in Figures 8(a)8(c). During molecular dynamics simulation period of 10 ns, the average RMSD value was 0.3 nm as depicted (Figure 8(a)). Steady RMSD result showed for the atoms in the four domains of PMM/PGM model indicated that the catalytic activity is relatively stable during the simulation. The result for radius of gyration (RG) also indicated the stability of model over the whole simulation period (Figure 8(b)). Minor fluctuations in C-alpha atoms (RMSF) of helical and sheet structural elements could be seen whereas loop region showed variability to some extent (Figure 8(c)). Overall, these results of RMSD, RMSF, and RG strongly indicated the stability of system over the entire simulation period.

Figure 8: (a)–(c) Results from 10 ns molecular dynamics simulation performed on PMM/PGM model. (a) Root mean square deviation (RMSD); (b) radius of gyration; (c) root mean square fluctuation (RMSF).

4. Discussion

Biofilm formation substantially aids to the spectrum of multidrug resistance displayed by A. baumannii and is often attributed as the major cause for antibiotic treatment failure [3, 5]. The process of bacterial biofilm development is believed to be a complex interplay of the biofilm EPS matrix components, that is, a plethora of proteins and extracellular macromolecules, for example, DNA and polysaccharides. The synthesis of specific exopolysaccharides such as alginate and LPS core has been described in various bacterial systems [25, 43, 44], in particular P. aeruginosa, with its contribution in biofilm formation [20, 22]. However, algC gene function and its expression pattern have not been elucidated in A. baumannii in order to understand the genetic basis of its association with biofilm formation. Herein, an initial genetic characterization of the algC gene and its association with biofilm formation is reported in the MDR strain AIIMS 7 of A. baumannii, which depicts differential expression of algC gene during the biofilm development. Besides, MD simulation was performed on the three-dimensional (3D) structure of the gene product (enzyme PMM/PGM) to compare with that of P. aeruginosa, followed by its cloning, heterologous expression, and phylogenetic analysis. Finally, biofilm augmentation by algC gene was evaluated quantitatively and confirmed by SEM.

Analysis of the algC gene expression pattern in the temporal scale (up to 96 hours) reveals that surface-attached bacteria have significantly higher rate of transcription levels than nonadherent or shaking cultures. The attachment or “surface sensing” could be the trigger for the activation of algC promoter, as a result of which the algC expression could be seen consistently higher (maximum 81.59-fold, ) in biofilm forming A. baumannii cultures than the planktonic counterparts (maximum 3.24-fold) as revealed by real time PCR analysis (Figure 1). This observation is in accordance with an earlier study in P. aeruginosa [45] which shows algC reporter gene activity in continuous biofilm culture cells to be 19-fold increased than planktonic cells. Earlier, Davies et al. [46] have shown that expression of P. aeruginosa algC is upregulated after initial attachment of cells to teflon or glass substrata, where cells that failed to upregulate alginate biosynthesis typically detached from the surface. As reviewed earlier by Gacesa [47], it is presumed that exopolysaccharide alginate plays a role in consolidation of the biofilm rather than in the initial adhesion event and hence higher rate of algC transcription was not a prerequisite to surface attachment by P. aeruginosa, indicating alginate biosynthesis not necessary for its attachment to glass surface. In contrast, our data in support of the relative quantification of algC transcription by real-time PCR and biofilm augmentation by algC as visualized by SEM is indicative of the possible involvement of algC expression in probably both the events, that is, initial attachment and consolidation of biofilms formed by A. baumannii. Furthermore, the upregulation of algC transcription at the maturation stages (36–48 hours) explains that it is strongly associated with maturation of biofilms, as the correlation of algC expression with biofilm formation during the very stage was significantly higher than the initial events (0.983 compared to 0.902, ). During planktonic mode of growth, low levels of algC transcription were observed as compared to biofilm forming A. baumannii, which should be ideally due to lack of surface attachment (less promoter activity) and variations in the oxygen tension in shaking and static cultures. Regulation of the algC gene could be dependent on diverse parameters as seen in P. aeruginosa, where it was shown to be in coordination with the algC promoter activity [23]. Besides, according to other studies, variations in oxygen tension [48], nitrogen limitation [49], and ethanol induced membrane perturbation [50] can also influence the alginate production in P. aeruginosa. In A. baumannii, we demonstrate differential algC transcription to be dependent upon abiotic (polystyrene) surface attachment and thus, further investigation would be required to portray a comprehensive profile of algC genetic regulation.

The 3D structure of PMM/PGM bifunctional enzyme as determined by homology modeling, which is the gene product of algC from A. baumannii strain AIIMS 7, shows 32% overall similarity. Furthermore, high sequence identity of the catalytic domain was observed with that of experimentally determined structure of PMM/PGM of P. aeruginosa [42]. Each of the four domains contained residues essential for catalysis and/or substrate recognition. While the catalytic phosphoserine residue (Ser104) of domain 1 could be useful to transfer phosphoryl group to and from the bisphosphorylated reaction intermediate, domain 2 was found to contain a metal binding loop (Asp244, Asp246, Asp248) that could coordinate the Mg2+ ion required for the PMM/PGM activity (Figure 7(d)). Domain 3 of PMM/PGM of A. baumannii also contains sugar binding loop (Glu327, Ala329, His331) similar to that in PMM/PGM of P. aeruginosa. This sugar binding loop has key residues which could enable the enzyme to recognize the two different binding orientations of its 1- and 6-phospho sugar substrates. Domains 3 and 4 provide most of the residues that create a phosphate binding site (Lys287 of domain 3 and Arg427, Arg438 of domain 4) that determines the orientation of the incoming phosphor-sugar substrates. In context with previous studies in P. aeruginosa PMM/PGM [27, 51], our investigation predicts that PMM/PGM of A. baumannii requires Mg2+ and activator glucose 1,6-biphosphate for its catalytic activity. Other physical properties of the protein analyzed in silico were also found to be similar to those of PMM/PGM enzyme from P. aeruginosa [42]. This indicated a similar function of the enzyme, that is, a bifunctional role which would be responsible for conversion of mannose-6-phosphate to mannose-1-phosphate or glucose-6-phosphate to glucose-1-phosphate as in P. aeruginosa [28].

The active site residues predicted in the PMM/PGM enzyme 3D structure were determined by multiple sequence alignments and, however, needs to be validated by experimental analysis. In context of sugar binding loop, PMM/PGM of A. baumannii may also have equal specificity for glucose as well as mannose, because mannose and glucose are epimers at C-2. The active site residues of characterized PMM/PGM complexes are known to change conformation based on the identity of the bound ligand and/or change the type of contact in which they participate [28, 52]. However, a direct structural characterization of multiple enzyme-substrate complexes would likely be necessary for a full understanding of substrate specificity in this enzyme superfamily. Nevertheless, the MD simulation results in this research reveal several regions of the PMM/PGM enzyme to be highly conserved and clearly important for function in all organisms, supporting the proposal that all of these enzymes use a common mechanism. The algC gene of A. baumannii AIIMS 7 characterized in this study is an ortholog of algC gene from P. aeruginosa. The PMM/PGM protein plays a central role in the production of three P. aeruginosa virulence-associated traits, alginate, rhamnolipids, and LPS, although the production of these compounds is subjected to a completely different genetic and environmental regulation [23, 45]. The PGM activity of the protein is involved in synthesis of the LPS core of biofilms, while PMM activity is responsible for alginate biosynthesis. Both of these (PMM/PGM) enzymatic functions either singly or in combination could be attributed for the biofilm formation in A. baumannii AIIMS 7 and augmentation of biofilms in heterologous clones as observed by SEM. It is also conceivable, therefore, that the cloned and overexpressed PGM enzyme (of A. baumannii AIIMS 7) might have used up the machinery for cellular LPS core biosynthesis in E. coli [25] and could be the possible mechanism behind the overall augmentation of biofilms in the heterologous algC clones (E. coli DH5α, a relatively weak biofilm former than A. baumannii) as evident from the SEM image analysis. Nevertheless, due to the central role of PMM/PGM in biosynthetic pathways, the enzyme has potential to serve as a novel marker for A. baumannii infection or as pharmaceutical targets for inhibition. Such inhibitors would be specific and not affect the essential homolog in human, due to lack of conservation in active site, sugar, and metal binding site.

The mechanism of PMM/PGM is believed to be closely parallel to that of related proteins from other pseudomonads including close relatives like P. aeruginosa. Our observations on the similarity of the protein sequences and 3D models indicate that the PMM/PGM protein of A. baumannii AIIMS 7 could have a similar biological role in biofilms as seen in P. aeruginosa. Therefore, the dual roles of PMM/PGM in alginate and LPS biosynthesis enhancing the biofilm formation in A. baumannii propose the enzyme as an attractive target for inhibitor design.

5. Conclusion

This study presents an initial genetic characterization of algC gene in an MDR strain A. baumannii AIIMS 7 which demonstrates a quantitative differential expression pattern in biofilm cells compared to planktonic counterparts cells over a temporal scale of 96 h. Molecular dynamics (MD) simulation studies indicate that the 3D structure of enzyme (PMM/PGM) has functions similar to P. aeruginosa which might result in significant biofilm augmentation in heterologous algC clones, as evident from SEM analysis. These experimental lines of evidence collectively suggest that the differential algC gene transcription in A. baumannii strongly correlates with the initial attachment (9 h) and maturation stages (36 h) during the biofilm development, however, may not be the only attribute contributing to biofilm formation and could be associated with other factors. The PMM/PGM enzyme can be a potential drug target for biofilm-associated infections of A. baumannii as revealed by the 3D structural simulation studies.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.


The authors thank Dr. S. Gosavi and Mr. A. Shinde, Department of Physics, University of Pune, India, for providing the SEM facility. Kailas D. Sonawane gratefully acknowledges University Grants Commission, New Delhi, Government of India, for computational facility support under the scheme UGC SAP DRS-I sanctioned to Department of Biochemistry, Shivaji University, Kolhapur, India. Praveen K. Sahu acknowledges University of Pune, University with Potential for Excellence (UPE Phase-1), for providing a senior research fellowship.


  1. M.-L. Joly-Guillou, “Clinical impact and pathogenicity of Acinetobacter,” Clinical Microbiology and Infection, vol. 11, no. 11, pp. 868–873, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. A. Y. Peleg, H. Seifert, and D. L. Paterson, “Acinetobacter baumannii: emergence of a successful pathogen,” Clinical Microbiology Reviews, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 538–582, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. L. C. S. Antunes, P. Visca, and K. J. Towner, “Acinetobacter baumannii: evolution of a global pathogen,” Pathogens and Disease, vol. 71, no. 3, pp. 292–301, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  4. A. Y. Peleg, A. de Breij, M. D. Adams et al., “The success of Acinetobacter species; genetic, metabolic and virulence attributes,” PLoS ONE, vol. 7, no. 10, Article ID e46984, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. M. J. McConnell, L. Actis, and J. Pachón, “Acinetobacter baumannii: human infections, factors contributing to pathogenesis and animal models,” FEMS Microbiology Reviews, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 130–155, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. S. J. Wilson, C. J. Knipe, M. J. Zieger et al., “Direct costs of multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii in the burn unit of a public teaching hospital,” American Journal of Infection Control, vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 342–344, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. M. V. Villegas and A. I. Hartstein, “Acinetobacter outbreaks, 1977–2000,” Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 284–295, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. A. P. Tomaras, C. W. Dorsey, R. E. Edelmann, and L. A. Actis, “Attachment to and biofilm formation on abiotic surfaces by Acinetobacter baumannii: involvement of a novel chaperone-usher pili assembly system,” Microbiology, vol. 149, no. 12, pp. 3473–3484, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. P. K. Sahu, P. S. Iyer, A. M. Oak, K. R. Pardesi, and B. A. Chopade, “Characterization of eDNA from the clinical strain Acinetobacter baumannii AIIMS 7 and its role in biofilm formation,” The Scientific World Journal, vol. 2012, Article ID 973436, 10 pages, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. H.-W. Lee, Y. M. Koh, J. Kim et al., “Capacity of multidrug-resistant clinical isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii to form biofilm and adhere to epithelial cell surfaces,” Clinical Microbiology and Infection, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 49–54, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. A. de Breij, L. Dijkshoorn, E. Lagendijk et al., “Do biofilm formation and interactions with human cells explain the clinical success of Acinetobacter baumannii?” PLoS ONE, vol. 5, no. 5, Article ID e10732, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. L. C. S. Antunes, F. Imperi, A. Carattoli, and P. Visca, “Deciphering the multifactorial nature of Acinetobacter baumannii pathogenicity,” PLoS ONE, vol. 6, no. 8, Article ID e22674, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. J. A. Gaddy and L. A. Actis, “Regulation of Acinetobacter baumannii biofilm formation,” Future Microbiology, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 273–278, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. J. W. Costerton, P. S. Stewart, and E. P. Greenberg, “Bacterial biofilms: a common cause of persistent infections,” Science, vol. 284, no. 5418, pp. 1318–1322, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. M. S. Favero, R. P. Gaynes, T. C. Horan et al., “National nosocomial infections surveillance (NNIS) report, data summary from October 1986-April 1996, issued May 1996,” American Journal of Infection Control, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 380–388, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. J. Chastre and J.-L. Trouillet, “Problem pathogens (Pseudomonas aerugìnosa and Acìnetobacter),” Seminars in Respiratory Infections, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 287–298, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. S. Favre-Bonte, J. C. Pache, J. Robert, D. Blanc, J. C. Pechere, and C. van Delden, “Detection of Pseudomonas aeruginosa cell-to-cell signals in lung tissue of cystic fibrosis patients,” Microbial Pathogenesis, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 143–147, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. J. G. Leid, C. J. Willson, M. E. Shirtliff, D. J. Hassett, M. R. Parsek, and A. K. Jeffers, “The exopolysaccharide alginate protects Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm bacteria from IFN-γ-mediated macrophage killing,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 175, no. 11, pp. 7512–7518, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. G. W. Sundin, S. Shankar, S. A. Chugani, B. A. Chopade, A. Kavanaugh-Black, and A. M. Chakrabarty, “Nucleoside diphosphate kinase from Pseudomonas aeruginosa: characterization of the gene and its role in cellular growth and exopolysaccharide alginate synthesis,” Molecular Microbiology, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 965–979, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. J. R. Wiens, A. I. Vasil, M. J. Schurr, and M. L. Vasil, “Iron-regulated expression of alginate production, mucoid phenotype, and biofilm formation by Pseudomonas aeruginosa,” MBio, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. e01010–e01013, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  21. D. J. Wozniak, T. J. O. Wyckoff, M. Starkey et al., “Alginate is not a significant component of the extracellular polysaccharide matrix of PA14 and PAO1 Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 100, no. 13, pp. 7907–7912, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. D. E. Nivens, D. E. Ohman, J. Williams, and M. J. Franklin, “Role of alginate and its O acetylation in formation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa microcolonies and biofilms,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 183, no. 3, pp. 1047–1057, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. N. A. Zielinski, A. M. Chakrabarty, and A. Berry, “Characterization and regulation of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa algC gene encoding Phosphomannomutase,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 266, no. 15, pp. 9754–9763, 1991. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. M. J. Coyne Jr., K. S. Russell, C. L. Coyle, and J. B. Goldberg, “The Pseudomonas aeruginosa algC gene encodes phosphoglucomutase, required for the synthesis of a complete lipopolysaccharide core,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 176, no. 12, pp. 3500–3507, 1994. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. M. Lu and N. Kleckner, “Molecular cloning and characterization of the pgm gene encoding phosphoglucomutase of Escherichia coli,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 176, no. 18, pp. 5847–5851, 1994. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. J. B. Goldberg, K. Hatano, and G. B. Pier, “Synthesis of lipopolysaccharide O side chains by Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 requires the enzyme phosphomannomutase,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 175, no. 6, pp. 1605–1611, 1993. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. G. S. Shackelford, C. A. Regni, and L. J. Beamer, “Evolutionary trace analysis of the α-D-phosphohexomutase superfamily,” Protein Science, vol. 13, no. 8, pp. 2130–2138, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. R. W. Ye, N. A. Zielinski, and A. M. Chakrabarty, “Purification and characterization of phosphomannomutase/phosphoglucomutase from Pseudomonas aeruginosa involved in biosynthesis of both alginate and lipopolysaccharide,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 176, no. 16, pp. 4851–4857, 1994. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. N. K. Pour, D. H. Dusane, P. K. Dhakephalkar, F. R. Zamin, S. S. Zinjarde, and B. A. Chopade, “Biofilm formation by Acinetobacter baumannii strains isolated from urinary tract infection and urinary catheters,” FEMS Immunology and Medical Microbiology, vol. 62, no. 3, pp. 328–338, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. E. K. Davenport, R. C. Douglas, and H. Beyenal, “Differential protection from tobramycin by extracellular polymeric substances from Acinetobacter baumannii and Staphylococcus aureus biofilms,” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, vol. 58, no. 8, pp. 4755–4761, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  31. T. A. Russo, J. M. Beanan, R. Olson et al., “The K1 capsular polysaccharide from Acinetobacter baumannii Is a potential therapeutic target via passive immunization,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 81, no. 3, pp. 915–922, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. M. W. Pfaffl, “A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT-PCR,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 29, no. 9, article e45, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. M. A. Larkin, G. Blackshields, N. P. Brown et al., “Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0,” Bioinformatics, vol. 23, no. 21, pp. 2947–2948, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. K. Tamura, D. Peterson, N. Peterson, G. Stecher, M. Nei, and S. Kumar, “MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods,” Molecular Biology and Evolution, vol. 28, no. 10, pp. 2731–2739, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. A. Sali and T. L. Blundell, “Comparative protein modelling by satisfaction of spatial restraints,” Journal of Molecular Biology, vol. 234, no. 3, pp. 779–815, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. D. Van Der Spoel, E. Lindahl, B. Hess, G. Groenhof, A. E. Mark, and H. J. C. Berendsen, “GROMACS: fast, flexible, and free,” Journal of Computational Chemistry, vol. 26, no. 16, pp. 1701–1718, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. G. N. Tseng, K. D. Sonawane, Y. V. Korolkova et al., “Probing the outer mouth structure of the hERG channel with peptide toxin footprinting and molecular modeling,” Biophysical Journal, vol. 92, no. 10, pp. 3524–3540, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. J. Dundas, Z. Ouyang, J. Tseng, A. Binkowski, Y. Turpaz, and J. Liang, “CASTp: computed atlas of surface topography of proteins with structural and topographical mapping of functionally annotated residues,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 34, pp. W116–W118, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. E. Krissinel and K. Henrick, “Secondary-structure matching (SSM), a new tool for fast protein structure alignment in three dimensions,” Acta Crystallographica Section D: Biological Crystallography, vol. 60, no. 12, pp. 2256–2268, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. W. Humphrey, A. Dalke, and K. Schulten, “VMD: visual molecular dynamics,” Journal of Molecular Graphics, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 33–38, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. E. F. Pettersen, T. D. Goddard, C. C. Huang et al., “UCSF Chimera—a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis,” Journal of Computational Chemistry, vol. 25, no. 13, pp. 1605–1612, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. C. Regni, P. A. Tipton, and L. J. Beamer, “Crystal structure of PMM/PGM: an enzyme in the biosynthetic pathway of P. aeruginosa virulence factors,” Structure, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 269–279, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. G. Gaona, C. Núñez, J. B. Goldberg et al., “Characterization of the Azotobacter vinelandii algC gene involved in alginate and lipopolysaccharide production,” FEMS Microbiology Letters, vol. 238, no. 1, pp. 199–206, 2004. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. S.-S. Yoon, S.-H. Park, Y.-C. Kim, M. Shin, C.-K. Chong, and J.-D. Choi, “Cloning and characterization of phosphoglucomutase and phosphomannomutase derived from Sphingomonas chungbukensis DJ77,” Journal of Biochemistry, vol. 144, no. 4, pp. 507–512, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. D. G. Davies and G. G. Geesey, “Regulation of the alginate biosynthesis gene algC in Pseudomonas aeruginosa during biofilm development in continuous culture,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 61, no. 3, pp. 860–867, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. D. G. Davies, A. M. Chakrabarty, and G. G. Geesey, “Exopolysaccharide production in biofilms: substratum activation of alginate gene expression by Pseudomonas aeruginosa,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 59, no. 4, pp. 1181–1186, 1993. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. P. Gacesa, “Bacterial alginate biosynthesis—recent progress and future prospects,” Microbiology, vol. 144, no. 5, pp. 1133–1143, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. A. S. Bayer, F. Eftekhar, J. Tu, C. C. Nast, and D. P. Speert, “Oxygen-dependent up-regulation of mucoid exopolysaccharide (alginate) production in Pseudomonas aeruginosa,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 58, no. 5, pp. 1344–1349, 1990. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. J. D. DeVault, A. Berry, T. K. Misra, A. Darzins, and A. M. Chakrabarty, “Environmental sensory signals and microbial pathogenesis: Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection in cystic fibrosis,” Bio/Technology, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 352–357, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. J. D. DeVault, K. Kimbara, and A. M. Chakrabarty, “Pulmonary dehydration and infection in cystic fibrosis: evidence that ethanol activates alginate gene expression and induction of mucoidy in Pseudomonas aeruginosa,” Molecular Microbiology, vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 737–745, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. M. M. Harding, “Geometry of metal-ligand interactions in proteins,” Acta Crystallographica Section D: Biological Crystallography, vol. 57, no. 3, pp. 401–411, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. C. Regni, L. Naught, P. A. Tipton, and L. J. Beamer, “Structural basis of diverse substrate recognition by the enzyme PMM/ PGM from P. aeruginosa,” Structure, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 55–63, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus