- About this Journal ·
- Abstracting and Indexing ·
- Aims and Scope ·
- Article Processing Charges ·
- Author Guidelines ·
- Bibliographic Information ·
- Citations to this Journal ·
- Contact Information ·
- Editorial Board ·
- Editorial Workflow ·
- Free eTOC Alerts ·
- Publication Ethics ·
- Recently Accepted Articles ·
- Reviewers Acknowledgment ·
- Submit a Manuscript ·
- Subscription Information ·
- Table of Contents
Active and Passive Electronic Components
Volume 2012 (2012), Article ID 181395, 11 pages
Novel Power Reduction Technique for ReRAM with Automatic Avoidance Circuit for Wasteful Overwrite
1School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, College of Science and Engineering, Kanazawa University, Kakuma, Kanazawa 920-1192, Japan
2School of Health Sciences, College of Medical, Pharmaceutical and Health Sciences, Kanazawa University, 5-11-80 Kodatsuno, Kanazawa 920–0942, Japan
Received 18 October 2011; Accepted 5 January 2012
Academic Editor: Daisaburo Takashima
Copyright © 2012 Takaya Handa et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Low-power operations can be great advantageous for ReRAM devices. However, wasteful overwriting such as the SET operation to low-resistance state (LRS) device and the RESET operation to high-resistance state (HRS) device causes not only an increase in power but also the degradation of the write cycles due to repeatedly rewriting. Thus, in this paper, we proposed a novel automatic avoidance circuit for dealing with wasteful overwriting that uses a sense amplifier and estimated the energy consumption reduction rate by conducting a circuit simulation. As a result, this circuit helped to reliably avoid the wasteful overwriting operation to reduce about 99% and 97% of wasteful energy using VSRC and CSRC, respectively.
Resistance random access memory (ReRAM) has been widely expected for use as the next generation nonvolatile memory because of its superior characteristics, such as low voltage operation, high-speed performance, and low power. ReRAM has a Metal-Insulator-Metal (MIM) structure in which the transition metal oxide is sandwiched between two electrodes as a storage element. This device has two switching modes: (i) unipolar switching in which the device depends on the pulse width and amplitude of the applied voltage and (ii) bipolar switching in which the device depends on the polar character . In this paper, we used a bipolar switching device that made the best use of this proposed circuit. Figure 1 shows (a) the structure of the ReRAM device and (b) the definition of the SET and RESET operations.
In this research, SET is defined as an operation conducted to change from HRS to LRS, and RESET is an operation to change from LRS to HRS. ReRAM has the great advantage of being a low power device. However, in order to have this advantage, not only the necessary device characteristics but also peripheral circuits, such as read/write circuits, are needed. On one hand, wasteful overwrite operations such as SET for LRS devices or RESET for HRS not only increase the power consumption but also degrade the write cycles . One solution is for the circuit to judge whether or not the device needs to be written after the circuit initially reads the resistance state like verifying operation in conventional NAND flash memory . However, in this way, both the power consumption and processing time increase because an additional full read operation is required for the write operation, as shown in Figure 2(a). Therefore, in this paper, we propose a new circuit that can automatically judge whether or not the circuit needs to write by using the avoidance function of the wasteful overwrite to reduce the wasteful power consumption by improving the conventional sense amplifier , as shown in Figure 2(b). In this proposed scheme, write operation can be conducted during read operation, so full read operation is not necessary, and this circuit has some advantage in aspects of speed and power. And also this scheme has merits of using the result of sense amplifier to write operation and adding the “write function” to conventional “read circuit,” and so read and write circuit needs not to be separated and achieving wasteful overwrite avoidance with added only 4 MOSFET against conventional sense amplifier.
This paper is organized as follows. An explanation about the circuit configuration and the principle of the operations are presented in Section 2. A Verilog-A empirical model of a ReRAM device and our simulation results are presented in Section 3. The conclusion is summarized in Section 4.
2. Circuit Structures
We propose two write circuits to avoid the wasteful overwrite that are composed of a voltage sense amplifier (VSA) and a current sense amplifier (CSA) because we compare the reduction power between these two circuits. These circuits have both functions, as a write decision circuit and a sense amplifier . Here, we call these circuits a voltage sense rewriting circuit (VSRC) and a current sense rewriting circuit (CSRC).
2.1. Circuit Structure and Operations
Figure 4 shows a timing diagram for the VSRC. Operation of the VSRC is divided into three phases: (i) cell reading, (ii) amplification, and (iii) precharge.(i)In the cell-reading phase, the Vout and Vout_ref of the VSRC are equalized. The input voltage dependent on the state of the ReRAM device is temporarily applied to gates of M1 and M2.(ii)In the amplification phase, both read and write can be operated by charging Cin. The read process is operated through the solid line shown in Figure 2. In this phase, SL is set to the read voltage (Vread), rw to “H” (vdd), and se_control to “L” (gnd), and the potential difference between Vin and Vin_ref in the equalization phase is amplified and outputted in the latching part. Meanwhile, the write process is operated through the dashed line, and rw is set to “L”, and se_control is set to “H”. Here, SL is asserted to “L” or “H” in accordance with the SET or RESET operations, respectively.(iii)In the precharge phase, the power supply of the VSRC is stopped because M8 is OFF in synchronization with the rising edge of the re signal (power saving mode).
Here, as shown in Figure 4, the re signal is asserted to “L” just before the end of cell-reading phase to suppress wasteful DC current in the sense amplifier. Therefore, DC current that flows through sense amplifier is minimized even at long-time cell reading due to long bit-line lengths when large array size is adopted.
The schematic of the CSRC is shown in Figure 5. In this circuit, the rw signal is used to control the switching between read and write operations. The CSRC operations are also divided into the (i) cell reading and (ii) amplification phase in both the read and write operations. Figure 6 shows a timing diagram of the CSRC. In the initial condition, control signals such as se and rw are set to “H”, and re is set to “L”.
Here, as shown in Figure 6, DC current that flows through sense amplifier is minimized even at long-time cell reading due to long bit-line lengths by controlling the re signal like VSRC.
2.2. Principle of Automatic Avoidance of Wasteful Overwrite Using VSRC and CSRC Architecture
The relationship between the resistance state and BL voltage is summarized as follows:(i)ReRAM < Rref ⇒ BL → “L”, /BL → “H”(ii)ReRAM > Rref ⇒ BL → “H”, /BL → “L”.
Thus, using the output of a sense amplifier depending on the current resistance state, a multiple overwrite of the same logic value can be avoided, as shown in Figure 7. In the SET operation, SL is set to “L” in the amplification phase. When the device is in HRS, BL becomes “H”, and so, the SET voltage is applied to the device. When the device is in LRS, BL becomes “L” and the SET voltage is not applied to the device. On the other hand, in the RESET operation, SL is set to “H”. The reset voltage is not applied to the device because BL becomes “H” when the device is in HRS and is applied because BL becomes “L” when the device is in LRS. We summarize the relationship between SL and BL, and principle of automatic avoidance of wasteful overwrite as follows:(i)SET Operation:
ReRAM (LRS) < Rref ⇒ SL → “L”, BL → “L”
(SET current does not flow : avoidance)
ReRAM (HRS) > Rref ⇒ SL → “L”, BL → “H”
(SET current flows through ReRAM : write).(i)RESET Operation:
ReRAM (LRS) < Rref ⇒ SL → “H”, BL → “L”
(RESET current flows through ReRAM : write)
ReRAM (HRS) > Rref ⇒ SL → “H”, BL → “H”
(RESET current does not flow : avoidance).
3.1. Simulation Condition
3.2. Verilog-A Modeling
The behavioral device model of ReRAM was developed using a Verilog-A based on the characteristics in Table 1. In this paper, we described the transient response of the bipolar operation of a ReRAM device. Figure 8 shows the simulation results of the transient response in the write and read operations using only the Verilog-A model.
Using this Verilog-A model makes it possible to simulate more a realistic circuit behavior while taking the phenomenon typically found in ReRAM devices such as sharp resistance switching in the write operation into consideration.
3.3. Simulation Circuit Structure
The circuit structure for our simulation is shown in Figure 9. Here, we omitted the description of the other signals, such as the se and re signals. Here, peripheral control circuits, such as address decoding and timing generation aren’t included in our simulation condition.
The read/write sequence was given as (a) READ→SET→READ→SET→READ for an HRS device and (b) READ→RESET→READ→RESET→READ for an LRS device. We conducted a simulation with conventional circuit and proposed circuit as shown in Figure 10. Here, we used the reversed logic-VSRC and CSRC as conventional circuit. Reversed logic-VSRC and CSRC was designed to overwrite intentionally as RESET operation to HRS device and SET operation to LRS device by replacing Vout with Vout_ref in VSRC and CSRC as shown in Figure 3 and Figure 5, respectively. Therefore, we can compare the energy consumption using conventional and proposed circuit.
3.4. Simulation Results
The results of the simulation are shown in Figure 11.
For example, if the state of the ReRAM device is initially in the LRS condition, the resistance state of this device transits in the first RESET operation. However, in the second RESET operation, this operation is unnecessary because the resistance state of this device has already transited to HRS in the first RESET operation. In the first RESET operation as shown in Figure 11(a), we found that the RESET pulse (negative pulse) is applied to both ends of the ReRAM device, and the device transits to the HRS. On the other hand, in the second RESET operation, this operation is wasteful, and, thus, the RESET pulse is not applied, and we can confirm that the useless write operation is automatically avoided.
3.5. Considerations for Power Consumption
In Figure 12(a) with no avoidance, RESET voltage is applied to ReRAM and consumes wasteful power (Area 1). On the other hand, in Figure 12(b) with avoidance, RESET voltage is not applied to ReRAM because BL voltage is changed dynamically depending on the current resistance state, and, so, the voltage difference between ReRAM becomes zero. Here, we defined the power reduction ratio as where Energy(Area1) is an energy caused by wasteful overwrite with no avoidance, and Energy(Area2) is an overhead energy caused by using proposed circuit.
We evaluated the reduction ratio of the consumed energy using the proposed circuit (w/avoidance) against the conventional wasteful overwrite energy (w/o avoidance).
We calculated the energy reduction ratio for the SET → SET and RESET → RESET operation sequences, as shown in Figure 13. Table 3 shows each energy consumption and reduction ratio in RESET and SET operation. Here, Energy(Area1) and Energy(Area2) in Figure 12 correspond to 3405 [fJ] and 135 [fJ] in Table 3, respectively. We achieved almost a 90% power reduction using the proposed circuit as shown in Table 3. Optimizing the timing of the se_control and SL makes it possible to reduce the power consumption of the CSRC although the power reduction ratio of the CSRC was smaller than that of the VSRC. Here, the speed overhead using proposed circuit can be controlled to only 1.1 times increase of time compared to conventional one because equalization time (10 ns) is 7 times smaller than amplification time (70 ns).
Generally, the time constant of the BL load depends on the resistances of ReRAM devices, the parasitic capacitances of the cell transistors, the distributed wire resistance, capacitance of BL, and the array size. These variations are solved by carefully controlling the timing of sensing (cell reading time). In practice, the sensing behaviors of these circuits depend on the data patterns stored in the memory cell array because the different data patterns on a column cause various BL loads. The waveform of the BL voltage is fluctuated within 2% for any data pattern in the condition that assumes 1024 cell per bitline.
The power reduction ratio in Table 3 was estimated for the consumed energy only in ReRAM array including activated memory cells and word-line/bit-line voltage swing. The energy consumption in the sense amplifier is mainly due to the DC current through the transistor M8 in VSRC and CSRC, and the DC current path is formed when both re and se signals are asserted during the cell-reading phase. Assuming that the period of the DC current flow is 10 ns, the approximate energy reduction ratio considering DC current consumed in sense amplifier is about 84% for the VSRC and CSRC though we haven’t done complete optimization of this circuit in consideration of the minimum DC current in the sense amplifier. The DC current can be suppressed by further optimization of the circuit and the timing of re signal.
We proposed an automatic avoidance circuit of the wasteful overwrite and evaluated the proposed circuit. As a result, we achieved about a 99% and a 97% energy reduction ratio using the VSRC and CSRC, respectively.
This work was supported by VLSI Design and Educational Center (VDEC), the University of Tokyo in collaboration with Cadence Corporation and Mentor Graphics, Inc. The VLSI chip in this study has been fabricated in the chip fabrication program of VDEC, the University of Tokyo in collaboration with Rohm Corporation and Toppan Printing Corporation. This work was also supported by Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C) (20510116, 23560391), Grant-in-Aid for Exploratory Research (23651136) of Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS), and Adaptable & Seamless Technology Transfer Program through Target-driven R&D (AS2121327) of Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST).
- S. Kawabata, M. Nakura, S. Yamazaki et al., “CoOx-RRAM memory cell technology using recess structure for 128 Kbits memory array,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Memory Workshop (IMW'10), pp. 1–2, Seoul, Korea, May 2010.
- Y. S. Chen, H. Y. Lee, P. S. Chen, et al., “Overview and future challenges of hafnium oxide ReRAM,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Solid State Devices and Materials (SSDM'10), pp. 1106–1107, 2010.
- C. C. Chung, H. Lin, Y. M. Shen, and Y. T. Lin, “A multilevel sensing and program verifying scheme for Bi-NAND flash memories,” in Proceedings of the IEEE VLSI-TSA International Symposium on VLSI Design, Automation and Test (VLSI-TSA-DAT'05), pp. 267–270, April 2005.
- Y. Ueda, Y. Iwata, and T. Inaba, “Design of low read bias voltage and high speed sense amplifier for STT-MRAM,” Tech. Rep., pp. 7–12, IEICE, April 2007.