|
Methodology | Author | Analysis | Approach/apparatus |
|
Experimental |
Arvidson and Scull [111] | Young’s modulus, proportional limit, and yield strength | A concentric, overlapping-cylinder, capacitance extensometer is used to measure the strain |
Gronauer et al. [112] | Young’s modulus | Sound velocity measurements |
Woignier and Phalippou [113] | Young’s modulus, fracture strength, and toughness | Three-point flexural and three-point bending |
Gross et al. [114] | Young’s modulus and Poisson’s ratio | Ultrasonic and static compression |
Scherer et al. [115] | Bulk modulus | Mercury porosimetry |
Parmenter and Milstein [89] | Hardness, compression, tension and shear on unreinforced and fiber-reinforced aerogels | Vickers and Knoop hardness test, four-point bending, and a displacement-controlled Instron 1123 testing machine |
Stark et al. [116] | Young’s modulus | Atomic force microscopy |
Moner-Girona et al. [117] | Hardness, Young’s modulus, and elastic parameter | Microindentation measurements using a Nanotest 550 Indenter |
Martin et al. [118] | Young’s Modulus | Uniaxial compression and acoustic velocity |
Perin et al. [119] | Elastic modulus and internal friction | Isostatic compression |
Miner et al. [120] | Young’s modulus and nonrecoverable strain for hygroscopic silica aerogel | Low-range compression tester |
Despetis et al. [121] | Subcritical growth domain in hydrophilic silica aerogel | Double-cleavage-drilled-compression test (DCDC) |
Takahashi et al. [122] | Bending strength | Three-point bending |
|
Numerical | Yang et al. [123] | Creep behavior of ceramic fiber-reinforced silica aerogel | Scanning electron microscope |
Hasmy et al. [124] | Wave-vector-dependent scattered intensity | Cubic DLCA fractal structure model |
Rahmani et al. [125] | Densities of states and dynamic structure factors | 3D cubic DLCA fractal structure model |
Yang et al. [123] | Creep behavior of ceramic fiber-reinforced silica aerogel | Power-law creep model |
|