Transformation of Goethite to Hematite Nanocrystallines by High Energy Ball Milling
α-Fe2O3 nanocrystallines were prepared by direct transformation via high energy ball milling treatment for α-FeOOH powder. X-ray diffraction, Rietveld analysis, TEM, and vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM) are used to characterize the samples obtained after several milling times. Phase identification using Rietveld analysis showed that the goethite is transformed to hematite nanocrystalline after 40 hours of milling. HRTEM confirm that the obtained phase is mostly a single-crystal structure. This result suggested that the mechanochemical reaction is an efficient way to prepare some iron oxides nanocrystallines from raw materials which are abundant in the nature. The mechanism of the formation of hematite is discussed in text.
Iron oxides nanocrystalline powders have attracted increasing attention due to their immense technological potential [1–4]. Among the magnetic nanoparticles, hematite has attracted great attention due to its unique characteristics, such as superparamagnetism, high saturation fields, and extra anisotropy contributions, which arise from the effects of finite size and large surface area. Such characteristics allow the potential applications of the hematite nanoparticles into many areas such as magnetism, catalysis, electrochemistry, and biotechnology [5–7]. Various methods have been developed for the synthesis of Fe2O3 nanoparticles such as microwaves , sol-gel method , forced hydrolysis , and hydrothermal reaction . However, this kind of method has several problems, including high levels of complexity, and has environmentally unfriendly conditions, such as high temperature, reagents, or high pH.
High energy ball milling turns to be the mostly used to prepare nanocrystalline of a variety of materials due to its simplicity, being environmentally friendly, low cost, and its ability to produce large volumes necessary for industrial applications. Several groups studied the production of hematite nanocrystallines from other iron oxides such as γ-Fe2O3  and crude α-Fe2O3 . To the best of our knowledge, there are only few works dedicated to the production of hematite or magnetite nanocrystalline from goethite (α-FeOOH) powders, which is by far the most common oxyhydroxide present in soils [14, 15]. Wang and coworkers obtained hematite nanocrystallines after 90 h dry milling of goethite with crystallite size of 18 nm .
In this paper, the production of hematite nanocrystallines (Fe2O3) from goethite (α-FeOOH) in shorter time than the one published in the literature is investigated. The obtained nanocrystalline will be characterized by XRD, Rietveld analysis, TEM, and VSM measurements. Also the reaction mechanism will be discussed.
Commercial powder of goethite (α-FeOOH) was used as the starting material. The powder was introduced into a stainless steel vial with stainless steel balls (12 mm and 6 mm in diameter) in a SPEX 8000 mixer mill. Different milling times were considered (2, 5, 10, and 40 h) and the balls to powder mass ratio was fixed to 10 : 1.
Structural characterization was performed using Rigaku Ultima IV high resolution X-ray diffractometer equipped with Cu-Kα radiation ( Å). Rietveld analysis was performed using PDXL program provided with the diffractometer to identify the phases and determine the lattice parameters and the crystallite size. Particles size and shape are determined by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) by using JEOL (JEM-2100F) electron operated at 200 keV.
Magnetic measurements were performed at room temperature using a PMC MicroMag 3900 model vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM) equipped with 1 Tesla magnet.
3. Results and Discussion
Figure 1 shows XRD patterns for initial powder as received and milled for several milling times. The patterns of unmilled goethite powder show a series of strong and narrow peaks characteristic for high quality crystals. The diffraction peaks become very broad and their relative intensity decreases with increasing milling times. This is mainly due to crystallite size reduction and accumulation of microstrain during mechanical milling. It can be seen that after 40 hours some peaks of the initial powder disappeared and a new peak appeared. This result can be explained by the transformation of goethite under milling to another phase. By comparing the X-ray diffraction patterns of the sample milled for 40 h and the patterns of Fe2O3 powders in Figure 2, we can conclude that, after 40 hours of milling, the XRD patterns show reflexions that correspond to an inverse spinel structure, which could be either magnetite (Fe3O4) or hematite (α-Fe2O3); due to their structural similarities, it is difficult to differentiate between both phases from the XRD patterns.
Quantitative phase analyses using the Rietveld method have been performed based on the XRD data to distinguish between the two iron phases. An example of pattern fitting using the sample milled for 40 hours is shown in Figure 3. Table 1 reports the structural parameters estimated from Rietveld refinements. The estimated crystallite size is in the nanometer range and decreases with increasing milling time. Phase identification by Rietveld analysis shows the formation of a α-Fe2O3 nanocrystalline after 5 hours of milling with two other phases, namely, ε-Fe(OH) and Fe. For increasing milling time, the percentage of α-Fe2O3 phase increases and the other phases decrease. Finally, the goethite is transformed to hematite nanocrystalline with a small amount of iron after 40 hours of milling.
This direct transformation of α-FeOOH to α-Fe2O3 due to the mechanochemical effect can be explained according to the following reaction :
Wang and Jiang  obtained similar results and proposed a mechanism based on the dehydration and transformation of α-FeOOH during the ball milling. But the mechanochemical reaction mechanisms remain unclear and more investigation is needed.
TEM and HRTEM image of the milled sample for 40 hours are shown in Figure 3. It can be seen that the crystallite size is the nanometric size which is in agreement with the crystallite size deduced from XRD (Figure 4(a)). The HRTEM image (Figure 4(b)) indicates that the milled sample for 40 hours has a single-crystal structure.
Hysteresis M-H loop measurements performed at room temperature, shown in Figure 5, have been carried out on as received powder as well as milled powder for several times. The values of different magnetic parameters are reported in Table 2. I. It can be seen that the unmilled sample has a paramagnetic behavior. For increasing milling time, the samples exhibit ferromagnetic behavior with weak saturation magnetization value of 6.7 emu/g for the sample milled at 40 hours. It is important to notice that the magnetic parameters are affected by the milling time, which may be due to different phases obtained during the milling process. For example, Rietveld analysis showed that there are three phases in the sample milled for 10 hours, namely, α-Fe2O3, ε-Fe(OH), and Fe. For increasing milling time, the phase ε-Fe(OH) disappears and the sample is composed mostly of α-Fe2O3 with small amount of Fe and that may explain the decrease of the saturation of magnetization.
α-Fe2O3 nanocrystalline was successfully prepared by high-energy ball milling of goethite (α-FeOOH) powder after 40 hours of milling. The mechanochemical effect induced by high energy ball milling induced dehydration and transformation of goethite to hematite. This work shows that this method is environmentally friendly and shows easy processes to produce hematite nanocrystalline form goethite which is by far the most common oxyhydroxide present in soils.
Conflict of Interests
The author declares that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.
The author would like to thank Dr. M. Bououdina for kindly providing support for the Rietveld analysis.
A. K. Boal, V. M. Rotello, Ed., Kluwer Academic, NewYork, NY, USA, 2004.
S. Sun, C. B. Murray, D. Weller, L. Folks, and A. Moser, “Monodisperse FePt nanoparticles and ferromagnetic FePt nanocrystal superlattices,” Science, vol. 287, no. 5460, pp. 1989–1992, 2000.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
O. M. Lemine, I. Ghiloufi, M. Bououdina, L. Khezami, M. M’hamed, and A. Taha, “Nanocrystalline Ni doped α-Fe2O3 for adsorption of metals from aqueous solution,” Journal of Alloys and Compounds, vol. 588, pp. 592–595, 2014.View at: Google Scholar
Q. A. Pankhurst, J. Connolly, S. K. Jones, and J. Dobson, “Applications of magnetic nanoparticles in biomedicine,” Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, vol. 36, no. 13, pp. R167–R181, 2003.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Mimura, I. Takahara, M. Saitoa, T. Hattorib, K. Ohkuma, and M. Ando, “Dehydrogenation of ethylbenzene over iron oxide-based catalyst in the presence of carbon dioxide,” Catalysis Today, vol. 45, no. 1–4, pp. 61–64, 1998.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Matsuoka, Y. Nakatani, and H. Ohido, “γ-Fe2O3 ceramic gas sensor,” Matsushita National Technical Report, vol. 24, pp. 461–473, 1978.View at: Google Scholar
L. Huo, W. Li, L. Lu et al., “Preparation, structure, and properties of three-dimensional ordered α-Fe2O3 nanoparticulate film,” Chemistry of Materials, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 790–794, 2000.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Hu, A. Percheron, D. Chaumont, and C.-H. Brachais, “Microwave-assisted one-step hydrothermal synthesis of pure iron oxide nanoparticles: magnetite, maghemite and hematite,” Journal of Sol-Gel Science and Technology, vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 198–205, 1998.View at: Google Scholar
K. Woo and H. J. Lee, “Synthesis and magnetism of hematite and maghemite nanoparticles,” Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, vol. 272—276, Supplement, pp. E1155–E1156, 2004.View at: Google Scholar
J. S. Jiang, X. L. Yang, L. W. Chen, and N. F. Zhou, “A Mössbauer study on the surface hyperfine field of uniform hematite particles,” Applied Physics A, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 245–247, 1988.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Wang, X. Chen, X. C. Ma, and H. G. Zheng, “Low-temperature synthesis of α-Fe2O3 nanoparticles with a closed cage structure,” Chemical Physics Letters, vol. 384, p. 391, 2004.View at: Google Scholar
J. S. Lee, C. S. Lee, S. T. Oh, and J. G. Kim, “Phase evolution of Fe2O3 nanoparticle during high energy ball milling,” Scripta Materialia, vol. 44, pp. 2023–2026, 2001.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. S. Jiang, X. L. Yang, L. Gao, and J. K. Guo, “Nanostructured CuO–-Fe2O3 solid solution obtained by high-energy ball milling,” Materials Science and Engineering A, vol. 392, no. 1-2, pp. 179–183, 2005.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Gonzalez, A. Sagarzazu, and R. Villalba, “Study of the mechano-chemical transformation of goethite to hematite by TEM and XRD,” Materials Research Bulletin, vol. 35, no. 14-15, pp. 2295–2308, 2000.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L.-L. Wang and J.-S. Jiang, “Preparation of α-Fe2O3 nanoparticles by high-energy ball milling,” Physica B: Condensed Matter, vol. 390, no. 1-2, pp. 23–27, 2007.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar