Research Article
Structure, Mechanism, and Application of Vacuum Insulation Panels in Chinese Buildings
Table 2
Comparison of the thermal performance of VIP and other thermal insulation materials [
4].
| Materials | Thermal conductivity mW/(m·K) | Cuttable? | Fire resistance, waterproofing, and corrosion resistance | Prevention of physical injuries | Performance after penetration | Cost of unit heat resistance | Environmental impact |
| VIP | 4–8 | No | Low | Low | Weakened | High | Medium |
| Conventional thermal insulation materials | Stone wool | 34–50 | Yes | High | High | No change | Low | Low | Glass fiber | 30–40 | Yes | High | High | No change | Low | Medium | Foam concrete | 70–80 | Yes | High | High | No change | Low | Medium | EPS | 30–40 | Yes | Low | Medium | No change | Low | High | XPS | 30–32 | Yes | Medium | Medium | No change | High | High | Polyurethane | 20–30 | Yes | Medium | High | No change | High | High |
| State-of-the-art insulation materials | Gas panel | 10–40 | No | Low | Low | Weakened | High | Medium | Aerogel | 13-14 | Yes | Medium | Low | No change | High | Medium |
|
|