Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Advances in Materials Science and Engineering
Volume 2016 (2016), Article ID 2349476, 13 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/2349476
Research Article

Application of Response Surface Methodology and Central Composite Inscribed Design for Modeling and Optimization of Marble Surface Quality

1Mining Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Dicle University, 21280 Diyarbakır, Turkey
2Mining Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Çukurova University, 01330 Adana, Turkey

Received 18 April 2016; Revised 28 June 2016; Accepted 19 July 2016

Academic Editor: Antonio Riveiro

Copyright © 2016 Sümeyra Cevheroğlu Çıra et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. H. Yavuz, T. Özkahraman, and S. Demirdağ, “Polishing experiments on surface quality of building stone tiles,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 1707–1711, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  2. S. Gürcan, R. M. Goktan, and A. Yıldız, “Effect of mineralogical and microstructural properties on surface roughness and gloss of some ornamental marbles subjected to polishing process,” X-Ray Spectrometry, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 70–78, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. M. Erdoğan, “Measurement of polished rock surface brightness by image analysis method,” Engineering Geology, vol. 57, pp. 65–72, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  4. R. P. Ribeiro, A. B. Paraguassú, and J. E. Rodrigues, “Sawing of blocks of siliceous dimension stone: influence of texture and mineralogy,” Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, vol. 66, no. 1, pp. 101–107, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. K. Görgülü and A. Ceylanoğlu, “Evaluation of continuous grinding tests on some marble and limestone units with silicon carbide and diamond type abrasives,” Journal of Materials Processing Technology, vol. 204, no. 1–3, pp. 264–268, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. H. Huang, Y. Li, J. Y. Shen, H. M. Zhu, and X. P. Xu, “Micro-structure detection of a glossy granite surface machined by the grinding process,” Journal of Materials Processing Technology, vol. 129, no. 1–3, pp. 403–407, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. M. Ersoy and H. Kose, “The relationship between easiness to polishing and mechanical properties of marbles,” in Proceedings of the National Marble Symposium, pp. 337–349, Afyon, Turkey, 2001, http://www.maden.org.tr/resimler/ekler/e4243f5511fd6ef_ek.pdf.
  8. Z. Karaca, “Relationship between the mechanical properties and the surface roughness of marble,” International Journal of Materials Research, vol. 103, no. 5, pp. 633–637, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. M. Ersoy, L. Yeşilkaya, M. Y. Çelik, and Y. Geçer, “Investigation of the belt conveyor speed effect to the surface quality in marble polishing process,” Journal of Polytechnic, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 153–160, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  10. G. E. Box and K. B. Wilson, “On the experimental attainment of optimum conditions,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B. Methodological, vol. 13, pp. 1–45, 1951. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  11. NIST/SEMATECH e-Handbook of Statistical Methods, http://www.itl.nist.gov/div898/handbook/10/06/2016.