Stiffness-Displacement Correlation from the RC Shear Wall Tests of the SAFE Program: Derivation of a Capacity Line Model

Table 5

For every wall group, identified parameters of RDL with maximum and standard errors of the model predictions by using the response spectrum of the applied earthquakes with damping ratios of = 4, 5, 6, or 7%.

Group	Walls		()	Max err% (%)	Max err% (%)	Max err% (%)	Max err% (%)	Std err% (%)	Std err% (%)	Std err% (%)	Std err% (%)
	T01⋯T05		69.12	34	35	52	70	21	13	23	40
	T03⋯T05		71.81	32	37	54	73	19	13	26	44
	T06; T07		119.65	81	25	24	76	44	14	9	35
	T08; T09; T11		70.67	37	23	47	106	23	14	24	47
	T10		70.31	29	29	47	65	20	17	25	35
	T12		123.32	81	84; (57^#)	104; (41^#)	124; (57^#)	48; (41^#)	45; (32^#)	47; (30^#)	53; (34^#)
CFRP	T13		142.31	79; (48^#)	141; (36^#)	147; (46^#)	152; (84^#)	51; (32^#)	66; (19^#)	71; (28^#)	92; (57^#)
ALL	T01⋯T13		90.82	368	226	158	324	49	37	39	52; (50^#)

The tests on walls T01 and T02 did not follow the same design scheme as the rest of the walls and their results are used in this table only for the identification of the model and not for determination of the prediction error.
^#By using  Pa, instead of  Pa, in the model (see Section 3.8), the obtained error was different in the cases shown in brackets in this table.