Integrated Experimental and Numerical Comparison of Different Approaches for Planar Biaxial Testing of a Hyperelastic Material

<div>Contour maps of biaxiality index <svg height="11.9316pt" id="M43" style="vertical-align:-3.2957pt" version="1.1" viewbox="-0.0498162 -8.6359 24.3425 11.9316" width="24.3425pt" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><g transform="matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,0,0)"><path d="M610 18C585 26 567 34 540 68C517 97 499 128 476 171C452 215 425 276 413 304C496 332 570 394 570 494C570 555 545 595 509 619S419 650 364 650H139L133 622C216 615 219 612 203 527L129 132C112 40 105 36 23 28L17 0H279L285 28C199 34 194 40 211 132L239 284H284C320 284 334 275 351 236C374 182 394 140 420 93C459 23 495 -1 592 -8H600L610 18ZM480 485C480 424 449 372 403 342C374 323 338 316 293 316H245L291 562C296 589 301 601 311 608S337 618 358 618C432 618 480 575 480 485Z" id="g113-83"></path><glyph.data ascent="3473" descent="-2876" horiz-adv-x="627" vert-adv-y="627"></glyph.data></g><g transform="matrix(.0091,0,0,-0.0091,8.086,3.132)"><path d="M156 406V710C117 695 54 682 9 675V647C73 642 75 635 75 573V25C131 -2 180 -12 223 -12C359 -12 478 92 478 240C478 357 387 451 278 451C265 451 251 447 236 440L156 406ZM156 373C175 384 208 392 235 392C315 392 387 328 387 214C387 97 332 30 251 31C197 31 170 66 162 84C158 93 156 104 156 118V373Z" id="g58-96"></path><glyph.data ascent="1007" descent="-369" horiz-adv-x="517" vert-adv-y="517"></glyph.data></g><g transform="matrix(.0091,0,0,-0.0091,12.681,3.132)"><path d="M138 535C169 535 191 560 191 589C191 620 168 644 139 644S85 620 85 589C85 560 110 535 138 535ZM257 0V30C192 35 185 43 185 109V453C142 435 94 422 40 414V386C101 378 104 372 104 311V109C104 41 97 35 33 30V0H257Z" id="g58-103"></path><glyph.data ascent="1007" descent="-369" horiz-adv-x="275" vert-adv-y="275"></glyph.data></g><g transform="matrix(.0091,0,0,-0.0091,15.184,3.132)"><path d="M442 39L431 68C420 63 406 57 394 57C377 57 359 71 359 118V301C359 353 349 393 314 424C291 443 261 451 230 451C171 438 107 401 79 381C59 366 46 355 46 340C46 316 72 295 91 295C106 295 117 303 122 319C131 350 139 371 152 384C163 397 178 404 197 404C246 404 281 365 281 293V278C260 262 186 232 124 213C69 194 41 161 41 112C41 47 92 -12 163 -12C195 -12 243 25 283 51C288 35 293 22 308 7C319 -4 339 -12 354 -12L442 39ZM281 87C262 68 226 51 199 51C169 51 129 74 129 126C129 162 151 181 190 198C211 208 259 229 281 240V87Z" id="g58-95"></path><glyph.data ascent="1007" descent="-369" horiz-adv-x="449" vert-adv-y="449"></glyph.data></g><g transform="matrix(.0091,0,0,-0.0091,19.27,3.132)"><path d="M482 0V30C420 38 407 48 370 103L273 248C308 299 331 332 352 357C387 397 401 404 463 409V439H277V409C318 405 324 400 307 369C290 337 270 307 251 279L194 367C175 396 180 402 220 409V439H18V409C74 401 87 395 117 349L204 213C173 168 147 130 119 95C78 46 67 38 5 30V0H195V30C144 38 143 47 162 79C181 112 202 149 225 181L297 70C314 43 307 35 264 30V0H482Z" id="g58-118"></path><glyph.data ascent="1007" descent="-369" horiz-adv-x="481" vert-adv-y="481"></glyph.data></g></svg>.</div>

Advances in Materials Science and Engineering

fig10

Figure 10

Figure 10: Integrated Experimental and Numerical Comparison of Different Approaches for Planar Biaxial Testing of a Hyperelastic Material 