Research Article
Economic Analysis for Setting Appropriate Repair Cycles on the Fixed Materials and Facilities in the Public Rental Housing
Table 6
Comparison of conventional repair cycle and changed repair cycle per unit household (unit:
).
| Year | 1990 | 1995 | 2000 | 2005 | 2010 | 2015 | 2020 | 2025 | 2030 | 2035 | Total replacement cost | Cost reduction rate | Elapsed time after move-in (years) | Initial move-in | 5 years | 10 years | 15 years | 20 years | 25 years | 30 years | 35 years | 40 years | 45 years |
| Conventional repair cycle | Conventional method | — | — | — | — | 28,789 | — | — | — | 28,789 | — | 57,578 | 기준 | Optimal method | — | — | — | — | 16,347 | — | — | — | 16,347 | — | 32,694 | 43.2% |
| Changed repair cycle | Conventional method | — | — | — | — | 16,594 | 12,483 | 1,519 | — | 16,594 | — | 47,190 | 18.0% | Optimal method | — | — | — | — | 8,122 | 8,102 | 1,014 | — | 8,122 | — | 25,360 | 56.0% |
| Cost of conventional repair cycle (20 years) | 57,578 |
| Profit from the changed repair cycle | 10,388 |
| Profit from the application of the optimal method | 24,884 |
| Profit from the simultaneous application of the repair cycle and optimal method | 32,218 |
|
|