Research Article  Open Access
Mechanism Underlying Bonding Water Film Effect on Rheological Parameters
Abstract
From experiments on bonding water of different slurries and the analysis of flow curves, the bilinear fluid model has been improved. The results showed that the rheological parameters correspond to physical processes at different stages of shear strain. As shear rate increases, slurries evolve from highviscosity Bingham fluids to lowviscosity Bingham fluids. Specific surface area determines the number of edgetoface arrangements; mineral composition influences the binding strength of each edgetoface arrangement; and the volume fraction of particles regulates the distance between clay particles and number of edgetoface arrangements.
1. Introduction
The rheological behavior of slurries has been the focus of attention in many engineering applications such as hydraulic dredging [1], well drilling [2], slurry shield tunneling [3], and paper industry [4]. The physical state of a clay may change with increasing water content: from a solid to a semirigid plastic, then to a gel, and finally to a suspension. Water in slurries is classified as being either adsorption water, capillary water, or free water depending on its distance from the surfaces of clay particles [5]. The rheological behavior of a claywater system is determined by the forces that control the spatial arrangement and dynamics of clay particles with bonding water. These forces which mainly related to the particle hydration slow down the dynamics of water molecules within the force field of the clays. Thus, the forces increase the viscosity of slurry and modify its rheological behavior. But the effects of bonding water on the rheology of slurry are not yet well understood.
The nonNewtonian rheological characteristics of slurries depend on the particle size distribution [6] and the number and lifetime of the particle bindings [7] and are obviously related to volume fraction of particles in slurries [8]. A previous study pointed out that a slurry with more clay minerals has higher yield strength [9] because of the relationship between moisture and friction of the minerals [10]. Moreover, the thickness of bonding water films positively relates to cation exchange capacity (CEC) [11].
The Bingham model is usually used to describe slurries of high water content [12]. When water content decreases, slurries become fluids displaying powerlaw fluid with yield stress [13] and can be described by the HerschelBulkley model [14]. In ranges of lower shear stress, edgetoface arrangement of clay mineral lamellae causes elasticity [15, 16]. Viscoelastic behavior certainly occurs, but it liquefies in the upper stress range. So some researchers believe slurry can be described by a complex model combining the Bingham model at low strain rate and the HerschelBulkley model at high strain rate [17]. Also, it can be described by a bilinear fluid model combining the description of a pseudoNewtonian fluid at low strain rate and a Bingham fluid at high strain rate [18–20]. Actually, slurries under shearing produce a fast layer that transfers momentum to an adjoining layer of slower speed, with the value of yield stress reflecting the rate of flux of momentum [7]. However, the variation of microcell resisting shear force with macroscopic model parameters is still unclear.
This study on slurries improves the bilinear fluid model providing a better fit to actual flow curves and better analysis of effects of specific surface area (SSA), mineral composition, and volume fraction of particles () on rheological properties. The correspondence between rheological parameters and microscopic physical processes when slurries undergo shearing is also discussed.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Preparation of Slurries
Five groups of slurries were used in experiments: original sediment (Group Sed, from Taihu Lake, Jiangsu province, China), sediment with added clay fractions (Group Sed^{(+)}), sediment with reduced clay fractions (Group Sed^{(−)}), kaolin with distilled water (Group K, from Hebei province, China), and bentonite with distilled water (Group Bent, from Jiangsu province, China). The 4.5% organic matter in Group Sed was extracted using H_{2}O_{2} in pretreatment, and Group Sed was divided into Group Sed^{(+)} and Group Sed^{(−)} using the hydrostatic settlement method. The particle size distribution for each group was measured with Mastersizer 2000 laser particle characterization system (Malvern Instruments Ltd., Malvern, UK) using pure ethyl alcohol as dispersion medium. Distribution results for Group Sed, Group K, and Group Bent were similar when particle size is less than 10 μm (Figure 1). The physical properties of clay particles in slurries are listed in Table 1. Results of analysis for the mineral composition from Xray diffractometry are listed in Table 2.
 
μm. 

2.2. Instrumentation and Methods
The measurements of the flow curves of the slurry groups were obtained by using a rotational rheometer (NXS11B, Chengdu Instrument Factory, Chengdu, China) which was equipped with a concentric cylinder geometry [21]. The rheometer has 5 test systems for testing various slurries (Table 3) and 15 grades of rotation speed in the range of 5.6~360 r/min. The measuring ranges of the rheometer and shear stress are 2.8~1.78 × 10^{7} mPa·s and 27.67~21,970 Pa, respectively. The rheometer has 5 test systems for testing various slurries (Table 3). All the measurements were carried out at a constant temperature of 25°C.

To measure the adsorption water content, the following procedure was used: add some dry clay powders with mass into a volumetric flask with enough distilled water. When the clay reaches adsorption saturation, the water volume would shrink . The mass ratio of absorption water and dry clay can be calculated fromwith the density of distilled water being g/m^{3}. The average density of adsorption water in typical clay is g/m^{3} [22].
3. Results
3.1. Rheological Behaviors of Slurries
The flow curves of five groups of slurries are obtained through the controlled shear rate test. Take Group Sed^{(+)} as an example; typical curves plotted in a loglog scale are shown in Figure 2. The results showed that all flow curves of the slurries had a similar tendency that at high water content they were close to indicating ideal Bingham fluids; and at low water content, the flow curves exhibit both pseudoplastic (shearthinning) and viscoplastic (presence of a yield stress) behavior.
(a)
(b)
Values for the rheological parameters are deduced from the flow curves. To illustrate, we take the data for Group Sed^{(+)} at water content of 113.5% as an example (Figure 3).
To describe precisely the physical meaning of the rheological parameters, the bilinear fluid model was improved as follows:There are some rheological parameters: is the dynamic yield stress, which is explained as the extrapolated stress from the low shear rate region. At stresses below this yield stress, the slurry behaves like a solid. is the intersection of the linear part of high shear rate region on the rheogram and the vertical coordinates (as shown in Figure 3), which can be called the Bingham yield stress [19]. and are the plastic viscosities () which correspond to the gradient of the linear part of the rheogram in low shear rate region and low shear rate region, respectively. is the shear rate in the transition region (at this shear rate , which can be defined as the apparent yield stress [19]). Usually, is a little higher than on the rheogram. For convenience sake, is approximately equal to .
Viscoplasticity material can be described by an appropriate mathematical model, and the basic components used to describe the viscoplastic properties are friction elements and Newton sticky pots. According to the proposed model in (2), a mechanical model is represented schematically in Figure 4. The model consists of two friction elements and two Newton sticky pots. At stresses below the dynamic yield stress, the friction element remains rigid and s^{−1}. As soon as the strain energy exceeds the level required by the von Mises criterion [23], the elastic stress in the friction element attains the yield value and the friction element breaks allowing deformation of Newton sticky pot . Consequently, the slurry predicts a Bingham fluid behavior of high viscosity at low shear rate (). As the shear rate exceeds , the friction element breaks and the whole system predicts a Bingham fluid behavior of low viscosity at high shear rate () due to the Newton sticky pot .
In general, as water content decreased, all flow curves of slurries evolved along a pathway describing a Newton fluid, a Bingham fluid, and then a powerlaw fluid with yield stress. This trend could be described using a ratio of plastic viscosities ():
To evaluate the shearthinning behavior, the relationship between and is plotted in Figure 5. If and are taken as the lower and upper limits, respectively, for Bingham fluids, the distribution for Group Sed, Group Sed^{(+)}, and Group Sed^{(−)} evolves along the same pathway with increasing . However, the distribution of Group Bent retains the character of a powerlaw fluid with yield stress, whereas Group K retains Bingham fluid characteristics even at high .
3.2. Adsorption Water Content
The adsorption waterdry clay mass ratio of all groups is listed in Table 4. Obviously, slurry groups with high value of SSA and CEC have larger .

4. Discussion
4.1. Relationship between SSA and Rheological Behaviors
In comparing Group Sed, Group Sed^{(+)}, and Group Sed^{(−)}, which are of similar mineral composition but different SSA, their bilinear rheological parameters were found to be entirely different (Figure 6).
Supposing the adsorption water was evenly distributed over the clay particle surface, the thickness of the adsorption water film is then obtained fromWith the existing data, the thickness ratio of the adsorption water film for each of the three groups is : : : : . This implies that the same mineral composition leads to the same charge density on the particle surface and consequently the same thickness of bonding water, irrespective of SSA. Therefore, the bonding strength of every edgetoface arrangement was almost the same in slurries at similar . Nevertheless, slurries with higher SSA had more edgetoface arrangements, leading to differences in macroscopic rheological parameters among the groups. Moreover, all and , as well as all and , were close when . That implies that slurry viscosity derives mainly from hydration forces from capillary water because of greater distances between particles and less edgetoface arrangements. In this situation, SSA had little influence on rheological behavior. However, such an influence would be more obvious if increased.
4.2. Relationship between Mineral Composition and Rheological Behavior
Comparing Group Sed, Group K, and Group Bent, which have very similar particle size distributions but different mineral compositions, their bilinear rheological parameters were also found to be entirely different (Figure 7).
The thickness ratio of the adsorption water for each of three groups is : : : : . The specific surface area can be very large. The primary surface area of montmorillonite, that is, the surface area exclusive of interlayer zones, ranges from 50 to 120 m^{2}/g [24]. Thus, the SSA for Group Bent was weighted by a hypothetic factor 1/16 to account for the large difference between internal and external surface areas. The same particle size distribution implies an equal number of edgetoface arrangements, whereas thickness differences in adsorption water reflected differences in charge density over the mineral surfaces. The surface charge density is obtained fromwhere is Faraday’s constant, C/mol.
The charge density was positively related to CEC, and the fractional ratio for the three groups of : : : : was close to the thickness ratio of adsorption water film. With higher charge density, the particle can adsorb more hydration cations. This leads to thicker bonding water films and higher bonding strength in edgetoface arrangements. Therefore, surface charge density had a decisive influence on rheological parameters. However, for slurries at low , the rheological parameters were similar in value as described earlier.
4.3. Internal Mechanism of Rheological Behaviors
The rheological properties of clay minerals depend on the particle structure. The clay mineral lamellae generally carry negative charges on their faces and positive charges on their edges [25]; thus the cardhouses structure can be formed. The edgetoface arrangements are the major binding elements in claywater systems (Figure 8). The high viscosities are due to the existence of flocs which contain immobilized suspending fluids in their structures, and the effective particle volume fraction is increased. When slurries undergo shearing, the impulse is passed from fast to slow flocs due to differences in speed between adjacent layers. In this process, there are three stages depending on shear rate.
Stage I. If shear rate is extremely low, the shear force imparted is less than the bonding strength of the edgetoface arrangements. The floc would not distort and the macroscopic shear strength equaled the dynamic yield stress . This indicated that the slurries possessed a very strong solidlike behavior rather than a liquidlike behavior.
Stage II. If the shear rate is low and less than , the shear stress is greater than . The floc begins to distort, and a short distance appeared in the edgetoface arrangement. However, the particles are still subjected to surface charge attraction. The internal friction of slurries mainly comes from hydration of the adsorption water, leading to a higher viscous coefficient . Once the shear rate reaches , the effect of adsorption water maximizes and subsequently the macroscopic shear strength equals .
Stage III. If the shear rate exceeds , the effect of adsorption water gradually weakens. The internal friction of slurries mainly stems from hydration of the capillary water, leading to a lower coefficient of viscosity .
Moreover, shear rate and volume fraction of particles are primarily important, because these rheological parameters reflect not only the strength of edgetoface arrangements but also the number of such arrangements. In slurries with low , large separations between flocs led to less efficient edgetoface arrangements. As a result, all macroscopic rheological parameters are low in value.
5. Conclusions
The improved bilinear fluid model describes more precisely the rheological curves of slurries. If the shear rate is around zero, the edgetoface arrangement mainly produces binding forces among particles which then is seen as a dynamic yield stress at the macroscopic scale. The separation in edgetoface arrangements is stretched with increasing shear rate, and slurries appear as Bingham fluids characterized by high coefficients of viscosity as a consequence of hydration of highdensity adsorption water. Once the shear rate exceeds , the separation in edgetoface arrangements weakens binding from adsorption water. Capillary water and free water dictate the behavior of slurries which appear as Bingham fluids characterized by yield point and low coefficient of viscosity .
Slurry groups of the same mineral composition but different SSA had different rheological parameters. The primary reason is the difference in number of edgetoface arrangements, although the thickness of bonding water and the binding strength of each arrangement were similar. Slurry groups with the same SSA but different mineral compositions had different rheological parameters. This is because the surface charge densities of different minerals are not equal, leading to difference in binding strength of edgetoface arrangements. Clay minerals with higher surface charge densities have thicker bonding water films. Volume fraction of particles can affect the spacing between particles and the number of edgetoface arrangements. If , the effect of hydration on particles could be ignored; thus the rheological parameters of all slurry groups were close.
Competing Interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank the National Basic Research Program of China (“973” Program, no. 2012CB719804) and Nurturing Project of National Engineering Research Center for Dredging and Mud Treatment (Jiangsu province, China, no. BM2013013) for supporting this research.
References
 M. Chowdhury and F. Testik, “Subaqueous cohesive sediment gravity flows from open water pipeline dredge disposal: laboratory experiments and mathematical modeling,” in Coastal Engineering Practice, pp. 460–472, 2011. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 M. Mohammadi, M. Kouhi, A. Sarrafi, and M. Schaffie, “Studying rheological behavior of nanoclay as oil well drilling fluid,” Research on Chemical Intermediates, vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 2823–2831, 2015. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 F. Min, W. Zhu, and X. Han, “Filter cake formation for slurry shield tunneling in highly permeable sand,” Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, vol. 38, pp. 423–430, 2013. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 W. M. Bundy and J. N. Ishley, “Kaolin in paper filling and coating,” Applied Clay Science, vol. 5, no. 56, pp. 397–420, 1991. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 T. Saarenketo, “Electrical properties of water in clay and silty soils,” Journal of Applied Geophysics, vol. 40, no. 1–3, pp. 73–88, 1998. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 C. Zanelli, C. Iglesias, E. Domínguez et al., “Mineralogical composition and particle size distribution as a key to understand the technological properties of Ukrainian ball clays,” Applied Clay Science, vol. 108, pp. 102–110, 2015. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 T. Gillespie, “An extension of Goodeve's impulse theory of viscosity to pseudoplastic systems,” Journal of Colloid Science, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 219–231, 1960. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. L. Amorós, V. Beltrán, V. Sanz, and J. C. Jarque, “Electrokinetic and rheological properties of highly concentrated kaolin dispersions: influence of particle volume fraction and dispersant concentration,” Applied Clay Science, vol. 49, no. 12, pp. 33–43, 2010. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 S. P. Bentley, “Viscometric assessment of remoulded sensitive clays,” Canadian Geotechnical Journal, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 414–419, 1979. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 C. A. Morrow, D. E. Moore, and D. A. Lockner, “The effect of mineral bond strength and adsorbed water on fault gouge frictional strength,” Geophysical Research Letters, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 815–818, 2000. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 K. Tone, M. Kamori, Y. Shibasaki, Y. Takeda, and O. Yamamoto, “Effect of the surface potential on the cation exchange capacity of kaolin minerals,” Clay Science, vol. 10, pp. 327–335, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
 J. Locat and D. Demers, “Viscosity, yield stress, remolded strength, and liquidity index relationships for sensitive clays,” Canadian Geotechnical Journal, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 799–806, 1988. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 T. Hemphil, W. Campos, and A. Pilehvari, “Yieldpower law model more accurately predicts mud rheology,” Oil & Gas Journal, vol. 91, no. 34, pp. 45–50, 1993. View at: Google Scholar
 H. A. Barnes, “The yield stress—a review or ‘panta roi’everything flows?” Journal of NonNewtonian Fluid Mechanics, vol. 81, no. 12, pp. 133–178, 1999. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 E. Tombácz and M. Szekeres, “Colloidal behavior of aqueous montmorillonite suspensions: the specific role of pH in the presence of indifferent electrolytes,” Applied Clay Science, vol. 27, no. 12, pp. 75–94, 2004. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 E. Tombácz and M. Szekeres, “Surface charge heterogeneity of kaolinite in aqueous suspension in comparison with montmorillonite,” Applied Clay Science, vol. 34, no. 1–4, pp. 105–124, 2006. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 T. Inoue, T.S. Tan, and S.L. Lee, “An investigation of shear strength of slurry clay,” Soils and Foundations, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 1–10, 1990. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 S. W. Jeong, “The viscosity of finegrained sediments: a comparison of low to mediumactivity and highactivity clays,” Engineering Geology, vol. 154, pp. 1–5, 2013. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 S. W. Jeong, J. Locat, S. Leroueil, and J.P. Malet, “Rheological properties of finegrained sediment: the roles of texture and mineralogy,” Canadian Geotechnical Journal, vol. 47, no. 10, pp. 1085–1100, 2010. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. Locat, “Normalized rheological behaviour of fine muds and their flow properties in a pseudoplastic regime,” in Proceedings of 1st International Conference on DebrisFlow Hazards Mitigation: Mechanics, Prediction, and Assessment, pp. 260–269, ASCE, San Francisco, Calif, USA, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
 M. Cao, Q. Yan, X. Li, and Y. Mi, “Effect of platelike alumina on the properties of alumina ceramics prepared by gelcasting,” Materials Science and Engineering: A, vol. 589, pp. 97–100, 2014. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 H. Yao, P. Cheng, Y. Yang, and W. Wu, “Theory and practice concerning classification for expansive soils using standard moisture absorption water content,” Science in China, Series E: Technological Sciences, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 31–40, 2005. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 P. Saramito, “A new elastoviscoplastic model based on the HerschelBulkley viscoplastic model,” Journal of NonNewtonian Fluid Mechanics, vol. 158, no. 1–3, pp. 154–161, 2009. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. K. Mitchell and K. Soga, Fundamentals of Soil Behavior, 2005.
 H. Yilmaz, S. Güler, and Ç. Güler, “The rheological and dielectric properties of kaolinite suspensions in the presence of alcohols,” Physica Scripta, vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 77–80, 1999. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
Copyright
Copyright © 2016 Yiyan Lv et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.