Research Article  Open Access
Experimental Assessment on the Hysteretic Behavior of a FullScale Traditional Chinese Timber Structure Using a Synchronous Loading Technique
Abstract
In traditional Chinese timber structures, few tie beams were used between columns, and the column base was placed directly on a stone base. In order to study the hysteretic behavior of such structures, a fullscale model was established. The model size was determined according to the requirements of an eighth grade material system specified in the architectural treatise Yingzaofashi written during the Song Dynasty. In light of the vertical lift and drop of the test model during horizontal reciprocating motions, the horizontal lowcycle reciprocating loading experiments were conducted using a synchronous loading technique. By analyzing the loaddisplacement hysteresis curves, envelope curves, deformation capacity, energy dissipation, and change in stiffness under different vertical loads, it is found that the timber frame exhibits obvious signs of selfrestoring and favorable plastic deformation capacity. As the horizontal displacement increases, the equivalent viscous damping coefficient generally declines first and then increases. At the same time, the stiffness degrades rapidly first and then decreases slowly. Increasing vertical loading will improve the deformation, energydissipation capacity, and stiffness of the timber frame.
1. Introduction
A large number of traditional timber structures have been damaged during earthquakes. For instance, during the ChiChi earthquake in Taiwan, a total of 742 traditional timber structures were damaged in the areas seriously affected by the earthquake [1]. During the Wenchuan earthquake in Sichuan Province, China, nearly 10,000 traditional timber structures in 419 sites protecting cultural relics were damaged to various degrees [2]. Therefore, there is an urgent need to protect and repair the traditional timber structures to preserve their significance and heritage value. In particular, the seismic behavior of these structures needs to be studied thoroughly.
A traditional timber structure in East Asia consists of a roof layer, bracket set layer, column framework, and platform base. A good example is the Yingxian Wooden Pagoda in Shanxi Province, China (Figures 1(a) and 1(b)). The seismic behavior of this complex structure has drawn much attention from scholars. However, certain seismic issues including the roof space system with large selfweight and stiffness, the energy dissipation in the bracket sets due to shear friction (Figure 1(c)), the semirigid connection in mortise and tenon joints [3], and the column base resting directly on a stone base [4] (Figure 1(d)) have not been fully studied. Researchers have investigated the hysteretic behavior of bracket sets and mortisetenon joints by performing horizontal and lowcycle reciprocating loading experiments.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
A bracket set is a unique construction used in traditional Chinese timber structures. The proportion of the rotational and slip motion (the main seismic behavior of bracket sets) in each block and corbel has been analyzed using reducedscale (1/3.25 and 2/3) and fullscale models to obtain the primary deformation of each component [5–8]. The rotation of block 1 (the lowest layer in the bracket set, as shown in Figure 1(c)) has a great influence, especially with respect to the initial stiffness. The initial stiffness of a bracket set can be determined from the elastic deformation of the wood perpendicular to the grain of the bottom of block 1. The restoring forces and skeleton curves of simplified models can be established according to the hysteresis curves in which the forcedisplacement relationship is highly dependent on the rotational spring stiffness and vertical load. It appears that the yield moment is improved when a heavier vertical load is imposed on the structure.
The hysteretic behavior of mortisetenon joints of beam columns of different types also exhibits some differences. The restoring forces and skeleton curves for simplified models of different mortisetenon joints have been established according to tests on reducedscale models of the column framework (ratios of 1/3.25 and 1/2) [9, 10]. Among them, dovetailed mortise and tenon joints possess the largest horizontal lateral stiffness but degrade more rapidly, and their strength is generally lower than that of penetrated mortisetenon joints. The full nature of hysteresis curves indicates a favorable energydissipation capacity.
In addition, gaps induced from fabrication, or due to installation error, or joint looseness resulting from cyclic loading also exerts a certain influence on the hysteretic behavior of mortisetenon joints [11, 12]. In general, the initial slip increases proportionally to the increase in the gap size. The existence of gaps in the contacting area lowers the moment resistance and strain energy.
Horizontal lowcycle and reciprocating loading tests of mortisetenon joints can be performed using a column framework model. However, these tests assume a hinge joint between the column and stone base which is contrary to the column base resting directly on a stone base in the traditional timber structures and ignore the rotation that may occur around the perimeter of the column. Moreover, an actuator or jack has been frequently used to impose vertical or horizontal forces, which limit the vertical lift and drop of a column framework during reciprocating horizontal motions. Simplifying the joints and restricting the loading method undoubtedly change the deformation of the timber structure and the resulting internal forces. This is even more evident in fullscale models.
It must be noted that, in numerous tests investigating the hysteretic behavior of traditional timber structures, reducedscale models exhibit size effects compared to fullscale models. To this date, limited study on size effects has been carried out [13, 14]. Tsuwa et al. [5] analyzed a bracket set using three different scale ratios (2/3, 1/1, and 3/2). The structures’ stiffness changed at a rate approximately proportional to the square of the scale ratio of the specimens. Compared to other specimens, the rigidity of the 2/3 specimen was higher, and its normalized horizontal force was about three times. However, quantitative relations for other parameters, such as the proportions of sliding and rotation friction of each component of the bracket sets relative to scale, are not known. In addition, definite quantitative relationships describing the influence of various structural components (e.g., bracket sets, mortisetenon joints, and column framework) on the whole timber structure are also unknown. Hence, it is better to use a fullscale model to represent the traditional timber structure to capture its true hysteretic behavior.
Fullscale tests on traditional timber structures using lowcycle reciprocating loads are relatively limited. Suzuki et al. [15–17] conducted a fullscale test on a Japanese traditional timber structure using the column base resting directly on a stone base to establish the restoring force acting on the model structure. It was found that the restoring force due to column rocking contributed most to the total restoring force when the frame deformation was small and that the bending moment from tie beams became dominant with the increasing deformation. The axial forces in the columns, dependent mainly on the roof weight, had little influence on the bending moment resistance of tie beams. However, a heavier roof would cause a larger restoring force due to its effect on column rocking.
Traditional Chinese timber structures are different from those built in Japan. In particular, traditional Japanese timber structures generally have tie beams between columns [18]. Park et al. [19] carried out horizontal lowcycle reciprocating loading tests on column frameworks with and without tie beams between columns. In the elastic region, the tie beams had no significant effect on the characteristic structural coefficients (e.g., initial stiffness of the framework) and energy dissipation. This is due to the slight gap existing at the joint between the post and the tie beam. However, certain coefficients (including the ductility factor) and energy dissipation in the column framework containing tie beams were improved in the plastic region. It seems clear that different facets of the construction method result in different structural characteristics.
In order to investigate the hysteretic behavior of traditional Chinese timber structures, the horizontal lowcycle reciprocating load test was carried out on the fullscale model in which the column base was placed directly on the stone base by using a developed synchronous loading scheme. The properties including deformation, energy dissipation, and stiffness variations of the fullscale model under different vertical loads were analyzed. The concluding results are useful in terms of the protection and preservation of existing traditional Chinese timber structures.
2. Design and Preparation of the FullScale Model
A single span of a traditional Chinese timber structure was selected in this study. According to the size requirements of an eighth grade system specified in the Yingzaofashi (a construction method of pre1386) from the Song Dynasty [20], a fullscale model with a single span was prepared (Figure 2(a)). Detailed sizes for the components are shown in Table 1.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)

The test model was designed to allow the vertical lift and drop under horizontal reciprocating motions. As the roof of the traditional structure has a significant weight and horizontal translational stiffness, the structure can be approximately treated as a rigid system [21, 22]. Therefore, the roof layer was replaced with a concrete slab [15–17] (Figure 2(b)). Bracket sets consisting of the lattice of square blocks and bowshaped corbels were laid on the top of the columns (Figure 2(c)). The bracket set layer was constructed by connecting bracket sets using rails 2, and the load from the roof layer was thus transferred to the column framework. Wooden dowels were used to connect columns and rail 1 (the structure on the architrave used to connect columns) as well as rail 1 and the beam. The columns were connected with the beam using dovetailed mortise and tenon joints (Figure 2(d)), and the upper load was transferred to the platform base through the column bases. For safety reasons, a concrete ground with a friction coefficient approximate of stone bases was used to form the platform base, and the column bases were laid directly on the concrete ground.
The fullscale test model was constructed using Pinus sylvestris imported from Russia. Material quality tests were also conducted on the same batch of Pinus sylvestris according to the required standards [23]. The airdried density was found to be 0.435 g/cm^{3} when the moisture content of the Pinus sylvestris was 9.39%, and the fully dried density was 0.412 g/cm^{3}. Specific mechanical properties are listed in Table 2.

3. Loading and Measurement Scheme
3.1. Loading Equipment
During the horizontal lowcycle and reciprocating loading tests, the fullscale model was rotated around the perimeter of the column base, and the arc motion could thus induce vertical lift and drop. The concrete slabs and horizontal synchronous loading device were applied to simulate, respectively, the vertical and horizontal loads (Figure 3(a)).
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
(g)
(h)
The horizontal loading device consists of steel columns, bar chains, spherical hinge bearings, cross girders, fixed pulley blocks, chain blocks, reaction frames, and steel wire ropes. The chain blocks were fixed on the reaction frames, and the tensile force imposed by them was transferred to the steel columns via the steel wire ropes. The steel columns subsequently imposed the horizontal tensile force onto the cross girders via the bar chains which were fixed within the concrete slab. As a result, a horizontal loading was imposed on the test model.
A few notes concerning the horizontal synchronous loading device are worthy of mentioning, as follows:(1)Spherical hinge bearings with 20 mm in diameter and 150 mm in length were used to connect the pedestals and steel column bases (Figures 3(b) and 3(c)). By adjusting the height of the bolts, the height h between the pedestal and the steel column base was set to be not less than 50 mm (=60 mm in this study) so that the steel columns could freely rotate in horizontal reciprocating motions. Moreover, the spacing of the spherical hinge bearings along the loading direction was set to be equal to the diameter of the column of the model (=334 mm) so that the synchronous rotation of the steel column and model column could be attained (Figures 3(b) and 3(c)).(2)The bar chains, cross girders, and steel columns were connected through hinge joints to form a fourchain mechanism consisting of the steel columns, bar chains, and test model (Figures 3(d) and 3(e)). By doing so, the force imposed by the bar chains on the test model was guaranteed to be horizontal at all times. When connecting the bar chains and steel columns, it was necessary to ensure that the bar chains were horizontal in the initial state, which could be done by adjusting the height of the steel hoops.(3)The tensile direction imposed on the steel columns (i.e., on the centers of the cross sections of the test model) by the steel wire ropes was fixed using two fixed pulley blocks (Figure 3(f)). Although pulled manually, the chain blocks showed a low loading rate (about 0.35 m/s), meaning that the loading was approximately uniform. In addition, while one side of the model was in tension during cyclic loading, the steel wire rope on the other side was loosened to satisfy the horizontal displacement of the test model of 300 mm. Apart from their effect on loading, the chain blocks also served the purpose of safety as they provided a protection in case the test model would collapse in the loading direction.(4)The synchronous loading device could be used to rectify any deviation of the tilt timber structure layer by layer, except for the intended horizontal loading performed during the test.
The vertical loading was increased by adding more concrete slabs. The weight of the roof (based on the size requirements of eighth grade materials) was calculated according to the roof type and the roof load encountered in different working conditions [24]. Based on the analysis of the threelevel vertical loads required in the horizontal reciprocating loading tests, three concrete slabs were prepared with each weighing 30 kN. As the top face of rail 22 was higher than that of rail 21, the size of the concrete slabs need not be less than the span between the rails 2 (i.e., S_{1} ≥ L_{1}, S_{2} ≥ L_{2}). As a result, the vertical load was directly transferred to the bracket sets underneath. It was thus determined that S_{1} = 3.6 m and S_{2} = 1.8 m, and that the height was 0.18 m (Figure 3(g)).
To ensure that the tests were conducted safely, various safety devices were employed, including security frames, scaffolds, screws (Figure 3(g)), steel wire ropes, cranes, and lateral pulley gears, in addition to the synchronous loading device (Figure 3(h)). In the roof layer, the concrete slabs were fixed together using screws connected to the security frame and crane using steel wire ropes such that a rope length of 300 mm was reserved to ensure no tensile force during a test. In order to avoid outofplane torsion and even lateral collapse of the test model, 12 lateral pulley gears were placed out of the plane of the concrete slabs. The frictional force between the two substances was so low that it could be considered negligible. To protect the bracket set layer and column framework, it was necessary to reserve a certain horizontal displacement of 300 mm between the test model and the scaffolds. The steel pipes were also installed out of the plane on both sides of the column framework. In addition, a gap of 20 mm was reserved between a steel pipe and a column of the model in order to eliminate the friction. After completing a test, it was necessary to tighten the safety bolts of the spherical bearings (Figure 3(b)), remove the concrete slabs, and tighten the chain blocks.
3.2. Measurement Schemes
In order to measure the horizontal forces and displacements of the overall structure, two force sensors and one horizontal displacement sensor [25, 26] were arranged separately on two bar chains and rail 21 (Figure 3(a)). To observe the state of deformation of the components at the mortisetenon joints and whether the bar chains remain horizontal during tests, six dualaxis digital inclinometers (model SVT626T) were arranged separately on the two columns, beam, rail 1, and two bar chains (Figures 3(a) and 4(a)). Measurements were recorded in real time using a data acquisition instrument. The horizontal tensile forces and displacements are defined as positive if directed towards the west, while a clockwise rotation is defined as the positive inclination. Additionally, two dial indicators were set up out of the plane at the column bottoms in order to determine if any outofplane torsion occurred in the test model (Figure 4(b)).
(a)
(b)
3.3. Loading System
The vertical loads were applied at three different levels: 30 kN, 60 kN, and 90 kN, and a variableamplitude displacement controller was employed to generate the horizontal reciprocating loading under each vertical load level. The horizontal displacements used were ±10, ±20, ±30, ±40, ±50, ±60, ±70, ±80, and ±Max mm (note: Max = the maximum control displacement corresponding to constantly increasing horizontal displacement and reducing horizontal force). Each level of controlled displacement was applied for one reciprocating cycle using the loading system shown in Figure 5.
The test model was prepressed for 24 hours after the vertical loading but before the horizontal loading. After the deformation of the model stabilized, the bar chains were installed to remove the effect of vertical compressive deformation on the initially horizontal bar chains. Also, to achieve a “stable deformation” for the test model, the model needs to be loaded to the controlled displacement level and unloaded to a balanced state (i.e., when the strain in bar chains 1 and 2 = 0) for 5 minutes in each stage.
4. Descriptions of the Test Process and Phenomena
Prior to the horizontal reciprocating loading, various initial sizes and defects (e.g., fractures) of each component of the test model were precisely measured and recorded in order to distinguish and compare the deformations occurring during the tests. To avoid compression damage between the components of the test model, the components were assembled on the site and checked to ensure that there were no gaps between the tightly contacting components of the assembled model. Additionally, it was necessary to ascertain whether the various monitoring systems (force, displacement, and inclination sensors) worked normally and whether the initial state of the bar chains was in horizontal position prior to the horizontal loading. Moreover, it was examined whether the interval between the spherical bearings was the same as the column diameter of the model and whether the reserved lengths of the steel wire ropes and spherical bearing bolts were correct.
As shown in Figure 6(a), when the western side of the test model was pulled during the horizontal reciprocating loading, the eastern side of the steel wire rope was reserved for the western horizontal displacement of the test model (set to 300 mm) in order to guarantee that the bar chain on the eastern side was not pulled. When the western side of the test model was pulled, the inclination of the western column was found to be larger than that of the eastern column, and this difference in inclination increased as the horizontal displacement increased. Besides, the edges at the bottom and top of the columns appeared to have subjected to compression deformation, and the test model appeared to have vertically lifted and dropped due to the rotation around the perimeter at the column bottom (Figure 6(b)).
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
(g)
(h)
(i)
The tenons of the mortisetenon joints were obliquely pulled out from their mortises on both western and eastern sides when the western side of the model was pulled (Figure 6(c)). The extent of the pullout was larger in the tenon on the western side than that on the eastern side. The extent of the pullout changed rapidly initially, but the rate of change slowed down as the horizontal displacement increased. The mortises became loose due to the mutual compression with the tenons, indicating that there was a large lateral compression of the mortises on the tenons.
The western column and beam of the column framework were tightly compressed with rail 1 (Figure 6(d)) when the western side of the model was pulled so that the western side of rail 1 became tilted relative to the column top (Figure 6(e)). Meanwhile, large gaps appeared between the eastern column, beam, and rail 1 (Figure 6(f)), and compression deformation occurred between rail 1 and the eastern and western columns (Figure 6(g)). It can be speculated that the wooden dowels used to connect the columns and rail 1 experienced large bending moments and that rail 1 was subsequently subjected to bending deformation (as the wooden dowels experience different bending moments on the two sides of rail 1). Additionally, the beam underwent anticlockwise rotation, while rail 1 rotated clockwise, resulting in a gradually developing gap between them (Figure 6(h)). Also, the wooden dowels experienced oblique shear deformation (Figure 6(i)), indicating that there was sliding friction present apart from the different states of rotation of the beam and rail 1.
The bracket sets remained well preserved during the whole horizontal reciprocating loading process, and there was no extension of initial fractures, and no new fractures formed in its components. No sliding was observed between rail 22 and the concrete slabs or between the column bottom of the model and the concrete ground. The deformation of the test model was mainly manifested in the form of rotation and plastic deformation of the components of the column framework. Rotation deformation was mainly exhibited via column rocking behavior which resulted in the pullout of the tenons from the mortises. The plastic deformation was mainly exhibited via the compressive deformation of the mortisetenon joints, the bending deformation of the wooden dowels connecting the columns and rail 1, the compressive deformation between the top of the columns and the bottom of rail 1, and the shear and bending deformation of the wooden dowels connecting the beam and rail 1.
The loading phenomena observed on the eastern side were similar to those observed on the western side.
Lastly, it was noted that the test model was not a rigid system with respect to the fourchain structure formed by the steel columns, bar chains, and the test model. Instead, there was a story drift and compressive deformation caused by the vertical loads during horizontal loading. However, since the story drift was less than the horizontal displacement and the vertical compression deformation was also small, the bar chains did remain “horizontal” at all times (average angle = 0.14° and 0.21°, respectively, for bar chains 1 and 2) and thus satisfy the horizontal loading requirements of the test model.
5. Test Results and Discussion
5.1. Hysteresis Curves
Hysteresis curves can be plotted using the loaddisplacement data recorded during the horizontal reciprocating loading experiments carried out on the test model (Figure 7). The curves are asymmetrical and exhibit pinching effects. The pinching effect becomes increasingly more significant as the horizontal control displacement and vertical load increase.
(a)
(b)
(c)
Initially, as load is applied to the model, the slope is larger implying a larger stiffness. This part of the curve is approximately linear and indicates that the test model behaves elastically. The slope of the curve declines significantly as the horizontal displacement increases, meaning a great degradation in stiffness. As the horizontal displacement continues to increase, the decreasing rate of the slope slows down, suggesting that the stiffness degradation also slows down. The various horizontal control displacements used produce similar loading path curves.
During the initial unloading stage, larger slope on the loaddisplacement curve and obvious hysteresis are noted, increasing the hysteretic energy dissipation. With decreasing horizontal displacements, the difference in the slopes on the loading and unloading curves increases first and then decreases. This implies that the components are exhibiting new dissipation energies. This phase reflects the maximum energy dissipation and more significant positive hysteresis. As the horizontal displacement further decreases, the slope increases significantly, thus increasing the stiffness greatly. As in the loading curve, a region of sudden change also appears in the unloading curve. During the final phase of the unloading process, the curve shows an approximately linear relationship and tends to return to the starting position. Although the residual deformation increases with an increasing vertical load, the total residual deformation is deemed quite small, indicating that the fullscale model has a significant capacity of selfrestoring. Apparent different paths of the unloading curves under a wide range of control displacements are observed, suggesting that hysteretic energy dissipation in the test model mainly occurs in the unloading phase.
5.2. Skeleton Curves
Skeleton curves as generated from the data are also asymmetrical (Figure 8(a)). In the initial loading phase, the timber structure behaves elastically, and its stiffness is at a maximum. The stiffness degrades rapidly at first when the horizontal displacement exceeds the elastic value, and the degradation then becomes more slow. This represents the elasticplastic rise stage. As the horizontal displacement continues to rise, the horizontal force in the skeleton curve changes slightly. At this time, the timber structure enters into a “plateau” phase.
(a)
(b)
According to the above analysis, the skeleton curve can be divided into three linear models: elastic, elasticplastic rise, and plateau phases. As in Figure 8(b), Δ_{e} and F_{e} are used to denote the maximum horizontal displacement and force in the elastic phase, respectively, and Δ_{p} and F_{p} are the counterparts in the elasticplastic rise phase. Moreover, K_{e} and K_{p} represent the stiffness in the elastic and elasticplastic rise phases, respectively. Averaging the test results from the positive and reverse loadings, the relationships between the parameters in the model and the vertical loads used can be derived, as shown in Tables 3 and 4. Discussion for each phase is given in the following sections.
 
Note. Δ_{e} and F_{e} = max displacement and max force in the elastic phase, respectively; F_{y}, Δ_{y}, and θ_{y} = force, displacement, and incidence at the yield point, respectively; Δ_{p} and F_{p} = max displacement and max force in the elasticplastic rise phase, respectively; F_{max}, Δ_{max}, and θ_{max} = ultimate horizontal load, max horizontal displacement, and max incidence, respectively. 
 
Note. K_{e} and K_{p} = the stiffness in elastic and elasticplastic rise phases, respectively, and K_{y} = yield stiffness, where K_{e} = F_{e}/Δ_{e}, K_{y} = F_{y}/Δ_{y}, and K_{p} = (F_{p} − F_{e})/(Δ_{p} − Δ_{e}); , , and = the change rates of stiffness in the elastic phase, at the yield point, and in the elasticplastic rise phase, respectively, where ρ_{K} = (K_{B} − K_{A}) × 100/K_{A} (K_{A} refers to the stiffness of K_{B} under the higher level of vertical loads). 
5.2.1. Elastic Phase (oa)
The vertical load exerts an insignificant effect in the elastic range, whose average lies between −11.7 mm and 11.7 mm. An increase in the vertical load improves the horizontal lateral force and elastic stiffness of the timber structure. The elastic stiffness increases with the vertical load in an approximately linear fashion. Also, the rate of growth in the elastic stiffness under the third level vertical load is about 4% lower than that under the second level vertical load.
5.2.2. ElasticPlastic Rise Phase (ab)
An increase in the vertical load improves the lateral horizontal force, yield load, and yield inclination [27] and so extends the elasticplastic rise phase. The stiffness of the structure under the third level vertical load is about 11% lower than that under the second level load, and the rate of growth of the stiffness declines. The vertical load exerts an insignificant effect on the yield displacement. Moreover, the stiffness and yield load both grow approximately linearly with the vertical load.
5.2.3. Flat Phase (bc)
The maximum inclination of the timber structure ranges from 1/28 to 1/21. Such values are larger than the ultimate inclination (1/30) specified in the Technical Code for Maintenance and Strengthening of Ancient Timber Buildings in China [28]. In addition, the maximum displacement is about 7.3 times the yield displacement. However, no obvious damage was observed in the fullscale model during the tests, indicating that the timber structure has a favorable plastic deformation capacity and good ductility.
As the threephase linear model is just an approximate model, the ultimate load is hence slightly larger than the maximum lateral horizontal force in the elasticplastic phase. As the vertical load increases, the ultimate load (about 1.4 times the yield load), maximum displacement, and maximum inclination all rise. This shows that increasing the vertical load improves the ultimate bearing and deformation capacities of the timber structure and delays the onset of damage to the structure. This further indicates that a heavy roof up to a certain degree is more favorable to the structure.
5.3. EnergyDissipation Capacity
The energydissipation capacity of a structure is generally specified by quantifying the hysteretic energy dissipation (Ehy) or the equivalent viscous damping coefficient (h_{e}). The former corresponds to the area enclosed by a hysteretic loop, while the h_{e} coefficient corresponds to the ratio of Ehy to the elastic energy under the same peak load. The two measures can be obtained for the three levels of vertical load according to (1) and Figure 9(a) [29]. It can be seen from Figures 9(b) and 9(c) thatwhere h_{e} is the equivalent viscous damping coefficient, S_{abc} and S_{cda} are, respectively, the areas enclosed by curves abc and cda, and S_{obe} and S_{odf} are, respectively, the areas of triangles obe and odf.
(a)
(b)
(c)
5.4. Stiffness Changes
When analyzing seismic responses, the tangent stiffness of a structure is frequently replaced with the secant stiffness. By carrying out the calculation shown in (2) [30], curves showing the degradation of the stiffness and the degradation rate of the timber structure can be obtained (Figure 10):where j is the sequence number of the loading cycle, F_{j} is the peak load of the cycle, and Δ_{j} is the displacement corresponding to F_{j}.
(a)
(b)
The stiffness of the timber structure degrades rapidly at first with an increasing horizontal displacement and then degrades more slowly. Increasing the vertical load improves the stiffness of the timber structure, and the amplitude of the increase gradually declines as the horizontal displacement increases. This indicates that an increase in horizontal displacement weakens the effect of the vertical load on stiffness. The amplitude of increase of the stiffness under the second level vertical load is 6.49–11.11% larger than that under the third level vertical load. This means that the increase in the amplitude of the stiffness decreases as the vertical load increases for a given horizontal displacement.
The stiffness rapidly degrades before the horizontal displacement reaches approximately 80 mm (in the elasticplastic rise phase). The rate of stiffness degradation grows with increasing vertical loads. When the horizontal displacement is greater than approximately 80 mm (in the plateau phase), the rate of stiffness degradation stabilizes, and the vertical load essentially has no effect on the degradation rate.
6. Conclusions
The horizontal lowcycle and reciprocating loading tests were conducted on a fullscale singlespan model of a traditional Chinese timber structure considering different vertical loads. By studying the hysteretic behavior observed, the following primary findings are offered:(1)The bar chains employed in the tests remain horizontal at all times. Thus, the synchronous loading technique used satisfies the necessary requirement of maintaining the horizontal loading for the rotating structure and also serves a protective role.(2)The timber structure has a significant capacity of selfrestoring and deformation. The deformations consist mainly of the pullout of the tenons from the mortises and the plastic deformation caused by the bending, compression, and shear among the different components in the column framework. The hysteretic energy dissipation displays mainly in the unloading phase, and the hysteresis in displacements occurs in the initial unloading stage which increases the hysteretic energy dissipation. Pinching effects become increasingly more significant as the horizontal displacement and vertical load increase.(3)The lateral horizontal force and hysteretic dissipation energy in the timber structure increase with horizontal displacements. The equivalent viscous damping coefficient decreases first and then increases. The stiffness degrades rapidly at first, followed by a slower degradation.(4)Increasing the vertical load improves the lateral horizontal force, stiffness, deformation, and energydissipating capacity of the timber structure and extends the elasticplastic range. However, an increase in horizontal displacements decreases the effect of vertical load on stiffness. In addition, the rate of degradation of the stiffness increases with increasing vertical loads if the horizontal displacement is small. On the other hand, if the horizontal displacement is large, the vertical load has an insignificant effect on the rate of degradation of the stiffness.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to express their gratitude to the Chinese National Natural Science for providing the financial support towards this study under Grant nos. 51338001 and 51278324.
References
 S. Y. Yeo, M. F. Hsu, K. Komatsu, Y. L. Chung, and W. S. Chang, “Shaking table test of the Taiwanese traditional DiehDou timber frame,” International Journal of Architectural Heritage, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 539–557, 2016. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Q. Zhou, W. M. Yan, X. S. Yang, and J. B. Ji, “Damage of ancient Chinese architecture caused by the Wenchuan earthquake,” Sciences of Conservation and Archaeology, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 37–45, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
 J. Wang, J. He, N. Yang, and Q. Yang, “Study on aseismic characteristics of Tibetan ancient timber structure,” Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, vol. 2017, Article ID 8186768, 15 pages, 2017. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 A. Harrer, FanShaped Bracket Sets and Their Application in Religious Timber Architecture of Shanxi Province, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2010, Ph.D. dissertation.
 I. Tsuwa, M. Koshihara, K. Fujita, and I. Sakamoto, “A study on the size effect of bracket complexes used in traditional timber structures on the vibration characteristics,” in Proceedings of the 10th World Conference on Timber Engineering, pp. 1344–1351, Miyazaki, Japan, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
 Y. Sui, H. T. Zhao, J. Y. Xue, and X. C. Zhang, “Experimental study on stiffness of Dougong in Chinese ancient buildings,” Advanced Materials Research, vol. 368373, pp. 819–822, 2012. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 K. Fujita, I. Sakamoto, Y. Ohashi, and M. Kimura, “Static and dynamic loading tests of bracket complexes used in traditional timber structures in Japan,” in Proceedings of the 12th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, pp. 851–858, Auckland, New Zealand, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
 S. Y. Yeo, K. Komatsu, M. F. Hsu, and Z. Que, “Mechanical model for complex brackets system of the Taiwanese traditional DiehDou timber structures,” Advances in Structural Engineering, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 65–85, 2016. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Y. Sui, H. T. Zhao, J. Y. Xue, H. Y. Zhang, and Q. F. Xie, “Experimental study on characteristics of mortisetenon joints in historic timber buildings,” World Earthquake Engineering, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 88–92, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
 Q. Chun, Z. Yue, and J. Pan, “Experimental study on seismic characteristics of typical mortisetenon joints of Chinese southern traditional timber frame buildings,” Science China Technological Sciences, vol. 54, no. 9, pp. 2404–2411, 2011. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 K. Ogawa, Y. Sasaki, and M. Yamasaki, “Theoretical modeling and experimental study of Japanese “Watariago” joints,” Journal of Wood Science, vol. 61, pp. 481–491, 2015. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 K. Ogawa, Y. Sasaki, and M. Yamasaki, “Theoretical estimation of the mechanical performance of traditional mortise–tenon joint involving a gap,” Journal of Wood Science, vol. 62, pp. 242–250, 2016. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 S. Šilih, S. Kravanja, and M. Premrov, “Shape and discrete sizing optimization of timber trusses by considering of joint flexibility,” Advances in Engineering Software, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 286–294, 2010. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 A. F. Moshtaghin, S. Franke, T. Keller, and A. P. Vassilopoulos, “Experimental characterization of longitudinal mechanical properties of clear timber: random spatial variability and size effects,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 120, pp. 432–441, 2016. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 H. Tanahashi and Y. Suzuki, “Elastoplastic Pasternak model simulation of static and dynamic loading tests of traditional wooden frames,” in Proceedings of the 11th World Conference on Timber Engineering, pp. 3309–3318, Riva del Garda, Italy, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
 M. Maeno, Y. Suzuki, T. Ohshita, and A. Kitahara, “Seismic response characteristics of traditional wooden frame by fullscale dynamic and static tests,” in Proceedings of the 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, pp. 1184–1194, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
 Y. Suzuki and M. Maeno, “Structural mechanism of traditional wooden frames by dynamic and static tests,” Structural Control and Health Monitoring, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 508–522, 2006. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 T. Okubo, “Traditional wisdom for disaster mitigation in history of Japanese architectures and historic cities,” Journal of Cultural Heritage, vol. 20, pp. 715–724, 2016. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 C. Park, H. Kim, C. Eom, G. Kim, and J. Lee, “Effect of lintel on horizontal loadcarrying capacity in postbeam structure,” Journal of Wood Science, vol. 60, pp. 30–38, 2014. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. Li, Ying Zao Fa Shi, China Bookstore Press, PR China, 2006.
 H. T. Zhao, F. L. Zhang, and J. Y. Xue, “The research of dynamic properties on the roof in ancient timber buildings,” Advanced Materials Research, vol. 368373, pp. 118–123, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
 F. L. Zhang, H. T. Zhao, J. Y. Xue, H. Ma, and X. C. Zhang, “The analysis of dynamic properties of the roofbeams system in ancient timber buildings,” Engineering Mechanics, vol. 29, no. 8, pp. 184–201, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
 GB/T 19282009, General Requirements for Physical and Mechanical Tests of Wood, Chinese Academy of Forestry Sciences, Shenyang, China, 2009.
 J. Y. Chen, X. W. Shi, Q. F. Niu, J. W. Wei, T. Y. Li, and Y. X. Zhao, “Analysis of similar CaiFen modular system based on the weight of the roof of Song dynasty,” Journal of Civil, Architectural & Environmental Engineering, vol. 38, pp. 27–33, 2016. View at: Google Scholar
 Q. F. Niu, X. W. Shi, J. Y. Chen, J. W. Wei, and T. Y. Li, “A kind of new sensor used in the measurement of large horizontal displacement,” Journal of Civil, Architectural & Environmental Engineering, vol. 38, pp. 59–65, 2016. View at: Google Scholar
 X. W. Shi, J. Y. Chen, G. H. Chuan, and T. Y. Li, “Geometric nonlinear analysis of the displacement sensor with a wide measuring range,” Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, vol. 45, no. 7, pp. 6–10, 2017. View at: Google Scholar
 R. Park, “State of the art reportductility evaluation from laboratory and analytical testing,” in Proceedings of the Ninth World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, vol. 8, pp. 605–616, Tokyo, Japan, 1988. View at: Google Scholar
 GB/5016592, Technical Code for Maintenance and Strengthening of Ancient Timber Buildings, Sichuan Institute of Building Research, PR China, 1993.
 F. VieuxChampagne, Y. Sieffert, S. Grange, A. Polastri, A. Ceccotti, and L. Daudeville, “Experimental analysis of seismic resistance of timberframed structures with stones and earth infill,” Engineering Structures, vol. 69, pp. 102–115, 2014. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 H. W. Shenton, D. W. Dinehart, and T. E. Elliott, “Stiffness and energy degradation of wood frame shear wall,” Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, vol. 25, pp. 412–423, 1998. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
Copyright
Copyright © 2018 XiWang Shi et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.