The Effect of Sodium Gluconate on Pastes’ Performance and Hydration Behavior of Ordinary Portland Cement

Lv, Xingdong; Li, Jiazheng; Lu, Chao; Liu, Zhanao; Tan, Yaosheng; Liu, Chunfeng; Li, Beixing; Wang, Rongkai

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/9231504

Advances in Materials Science and Engineering

On this page

Abstract Introduction Experimental Results Discussion Conclusions Data Availability Conflicts of Interest Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2020 | Article ID 9231504 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/9231504

The Effect of Sodium Gluconate on Pastes’ Performance and Hydration Behavior of Ordinary Portland Cement

Xingdong Lv,^1,2Jiazheng Li,¹Chao Lu,³Zhanao Liu,⁴Yaosheng Tan,⁴Chunfeng Liu,⁴Beixing Li,²and Rongkai Wang¹

Academic Editor: Victor M. Castaño

Received30 Aug 2019

Revised05 Dec 2019

Accepted01 Feb 2020

Published20 Feb 2020

Abstract

The goal of this paper provides better understanding of the effect of sodium gluconate (SG) on ordinary Portland cement (OPC) hydration behavior. Pastes’ performances of ordinary Portland cement, including setting time at 20°C and 35°C curing temperature, mechanical strength, fluidity, and zeta potential are studied. Furthermore, the effects of SG on cement hydration behaviors are investigated by the means of isothermal calorimetry measurements, X-ray diffraction (XRD), and thermogravimetric analysis (TGA). The results show that SG is difficult to maintain significant retarding effect at the temperature of 35°C compared to that at the temperature of 20°C. SG is able to reduce the cement cumulative hydration heat and delay the occurrence time of heat evolution peak in a certain extent, but it has little impact on reducing the cement evolution rate peak. The effects of SG on mechanical properties and dispersion properties of cement depend on its dosages. Specifically, the positive effect occurs when the addition dosage is less than 0.15% (i.e., by cement weight), but the negative effect emerges if the addition dosages exceed this limitation. Similarly, SG plays different roles on cement hydration at different hydration periods. It inhibits the hydration of C₃S and the formation of portlandite (CH) at the early hydration period. On the contrary, it promotes the C₃S hydration when hydration time is beyond 1 d. Meanwhile, SG also plays different roles on cement hydration at different dosage additions. Specifically, SG promotes ettringite (AFt) formation at the dosage less than 0.06%, but it inhibits AFt formation at the dosage more than 0.06%.

1. Introduction

The setting and hardening behaviors of cement are controlled by the addition of different retarding and accelerating admixtures, which is very commonly used in real concrete engineering [1]. The retarding admixtures can be classified to inorganic and organic admixtures according to their basic materials [2]. Inorganic retarding admixtures include phosphates, borates fluorine silicates, and chemical compounds based on zinc [3, 4]. Organic retarders include saccharides, ligninsulfonate, hydroxycarboxylic acid, and their salts [5]. SG is one kind of typical hydroxycarboxylic acid salt [6]. SG is commonly used in real concrete projects, which ascribes the significant retarding effect, good adaptability with superplasticizer system, and economic price [7, 8].

Many studies of the effects of SG on cement pastes’ dispersion and strength development are displayed in this paper [9]. According to Li et al. [10], the compressive strengths of cement mortars generate reduction at different degrees in the case of addition dosages ranging from 0.03% to 0.15%. Ma et al. [11] proposed that the appropriate amount of SG can further improve the dispersion performance of cement pastes mixed with polycarboxylate superplasticizer (PCE) significantly. Meanwhile, some studies point out that the effect of SG on the performance and hydration process of cement pastes are depending on its addition dosages. Tan et al. [12] suggests that the dispersion of PCE-SG system depends on the predominant effect, i.e., the contribution to dispersion predominates, at the dosage of SG less than 0.10%. However, the competitive adsorption effect predominates at the dosage more than 0.10%, resulting in declining dispersion ability. Ma et al. [13, 14] regarded as SG promoting the formation of AFt at early hydration time when the dosage was less than 0.03%. On the contrary, SG inhibits the formation of AFt when the dosage was more than 0.05%.

The effects of SG on cement hydration behaviors and retarding mechanism have not been fully understood, and several studies are mentioned in this paper [15]. Zhang et al. [16] suggested SG firstly, delaying AFt formation slightly and then promoting the AFt formation once it begins to form. According to Perez [17], SG can be absolutely adsorbed on C₃S surfaces, resulting in a severe inhibition of hydration. SG mainly delays the hydration of C₃S, which prolongs the induction period. vonDaake and Stephan [18] regarded CH and C-S-H formations are significantly influenced by SG dosages, whereas the renewing hydration reaction proceeds faster after the end of the induction period. Ma et al. and Wu et al. [19, 20] suggested that SG delays the cement induction period, whereas it accelerates the hydration of C₃S in the hydration acceleration period.

The previous studies discussed the setting behaviors of cement added with SG almost at a normal temperature, but the setting behaviors at higher temperature are less investigated. In addition, the hydration behavior of SG on Portland cement is still not conclusive. The effect of SG on different cement minerals is also not conclusive. This paper provides better understanding of the effect of SG on OPC hydration behavior, which include the retarding effect of SG on cement at higher temperature, the effect of different dosages addition of SG on cement hydration, and the effect of SG on different cement mineral hydration. The effect of SG on cement setting time, mechanical strength, fluidity, and zeta potential is studied. Besides, the effects of SG on cement hydration behavior are investigated by the means of isothermal calorimetry measurements, XRD, and TGA.

2. Experimental

2.1. Materials

The purity of SG (commercially available) is 99%, the molecular formula is C₆H₁₁NaO₇, and the structural formula is given in Figure 1. The solid content of PCE (commercially available) is 40%. The chemical of OPC and the content of cement clinkers are shown in Tables 1 and 2, respectively. The main chemical composition of cement and SF were determined by X-ray fluorescence (XRF). XRF data were collected by Zetium manufactured from Panalytical.B.V, Netherlands, in which the power of rhodium target window X-ray tube is 4 kw. And the cement clinker data are supplied by the manufacturer.

2.2. Experimental Methods

2.2.1. Physical and Rheological Properties

The measurements of cement setting time were tested using the Vicat apparatus. The setting behavior of cement added with SG curing in two different temperatures were tested. Specifically, the curing temperature regimes of cement pastes were 20°C and 35°C, respectively; furthermore, the curing humidity conditions were both on 95%. The setting time retention percentage of cement added with SG curing at 35°C was defined as follows:where P_r(%)is the cement setting time retention percentage at 35°C, S₍₃₅₎ is the cement setting time at 35°C, and S₍₂₀₎ is the cement setting time at 20°C. The values of P_r were used to evaluate the temperature adaptability of SG. It meant that the greater the value was, the more excellent the temperature adaptability was.

The samples for investigating performance of compressive strength were prepared using the specimens with the size of 40 mm × 40 mm × 40 mm. In this study, cement was prepared with combination of different dosages of SG (0.02 wt.%, 0.06 wt.%, 0.10 wt.%, and 0.15 wt.% by cement mass) and PCE (0.34 wt.% by cement mass) for investigating pastes’ fluidity. Mixing was immediately started after the addition of water and continued for 90 s. Paste scaling on the vessel walls was scrapped off, and mixing was continued for another 90 s. The cement pastes’ fluidity was tested at 0 min, 30 min, 60 min, and 120 min after mixing, respectively, and the curing condition was under the temperature of 20°C and humidity of 95%.

SG, deionized water, and cement were mixed in a mixer for 2 min to test the cement paste suspension zeta potential. And the selected cement paste was diluted 500 times by mixing in a magnetic stirrer for 5 min. The zeta potential of cement was measured by Zeta-Meter 3.0+ manufactured from Ankersmid, Netherlands. The mix proportions of physical and rheological properties are given in Table 3.

2.2.2. Hydration Heat Flow

The hydration heat flow of cement added with SG was carried out using the microcalorimeter with 8 channels (TAM air from TA instruments, United States) at a temperature of 20 ± 1°C. The cement heat flows were recording by using a computer, and the time span was ranging from 0 h to 168 h.

2.2.3. XRD

The mix proportions of cement paste for XRD and TGA are shown in Table 4. XRD measurements were carried out on fresh slices before stopping hydration [21]. And the hydration of hardened cement pastes were stopped by absolute ethyl alcohol. The time for absolute ethyl alcohol to stop cement hydration was 1 d and 7 d for XRD analysis, respectively. XRD was used to quantify the crystalline phases present in the cement paste [22]. The data were collected using by using a Bruker D8 Advance Diffractometer (CuKα,λ = 1.54 Å) operating in the Bragg–Brentano geometry on 40 kV and 40 mA. The XRD quantitifaction was studied by means of software MDI Jade 6.5 [23].

2.2.4. TGA

TGA was carried out with STA449C simultaneous thermal analyzer, and heating was carried out at a constant rate fixing as 15°C/min from 25°C to 800°C in this study. In addition, N₂ was used as shielding gas in the TGA test. The decomposition peak of CH in the hydrated cement system occurred between 420°C and 460°C in DTG curves. The CH amount could be calculated by using the following formula:where WL_CH(%) is the percentage of weight loss of CH and MW_CH and MW_H are the molecular weights of CH and H₂O, respectively [24].

3. Results

3.1. Setting Time

The setting time of cement pastes added with SG is given in Figure 2. The setting time of cement added with SG at the addition dosages ranging from 0.02% to 0.40% showed the tendency of gradual increasing. Furthermore, two good linear models y = a × x + b are fitted on these data to determine the relationship between the cement setting time and SG addition dosages when the dosages ranged from 0.02% to 0.15%. However, the final setting time of the cement added with SG at the dosages more than 0.15% sharply increases. To be specific, the interval time between initial time and final time even reaches over 60 h when the addition dosage was 0.40%, and the interval time is too long.

(a)

(b)

Most researchers discuss that the setting time of cement added with retarders is measured at normal temperature, and the effect of SG on cement setting behavior at higher temperature was rarely discussed [25, 26]. The setting time retention percentage of cement added with SG is shown in Figure 3. It can be seen that the percentage presents gradual decreasing tendency with the increase in addition dosage. Specifically, the initial and finial setting time retention percentages are only 26.3% and 30.0%, respectively, and at the dosage of 0.20%, the values of percentage are far more less than the blank samples (75%). It demonstrates that the environmental temperature has a great influence on the retarding effect of SG. And it cannot maintain the available retarding effect at higher temperature.

3.2. Compressive Strength

The compressive strength of cement added with SG is discussed in this part, and the results are given in Figure 4. The compressive strength of cement pastes added with different dosages of SG presents the tendency of increasing at first and then decreasing. The compressive strength is highest when the SG addition dosage is 0.06%. Specifically, the 3 d and 28 d compressive strength at the addition dosage of 0.06% is even higher, i.e., 7.5 MPa and 8.3 MPa, respectively, comparing to the blank sample. The 3 d compressive strength of cement pastes at the SG addition dosage more than 0.10% decreases sharply. In addition, the 3 d compressive strength is only 14% of the blank sample at the dosage of 0.20%. The 28 d compressive strength at the addition dosages more than 0.15% is less than that of the blank sample. Specifically, the 28 d compressive strength is 75% of the blank sample at the dosage of 0.20%. It shows that SG has positive effects on the compressive strength at dosage less than 0.15%, and once this limitation dosage is exceeded, the negative effects occur [27].

3.3. Fluidity

It is generally believed that the incorporation of SG can significantly enhance the dispersion ability of the cement-superplasticizer system [28, 29]. The influences of SG on fluidity of cement pastes’ incorporation with PCE are discussed in this part, and the results are given in Figure 5. The fluidity of cement pastes presents reducing tendency as time goes by. The tendency of cement pastes’ initial fluidity with SG dosages presents increasing trend at first and then the decreasing trend when the addition dosage is from 0% to 0.15%. Meanwhile, the cement pastes’ initial fluidity is largest when the addition dosage is 0.06%. More importantly, the fluidity of paste added with 0.15% SG is less than the blank sample at different times. It shows that the dispersion behaviors of PCE-SG-cement system are decided by the addition dosage of SG. SG enhances the cement pastes’ dispersion at lower dosages, whereas it generates negative effect on pastes’ dispersion at higher dosages, and this phenomenon is consistent with the conclusion proposed by Zhang at al. [16]. It is attributed to the long side chain of PCE that may induce negative effects on the combination with SG, due to PCE with much bigger conformation size than carboxyl group in solution, and it can hinder the SG molecules from approaching to the carboxyl groups in PCE [11, 30].

(a)

(b)

3.4. Zeta Potential

Effect of SG on zeta potential of cement paste is presented in Figure 6. Zeta potential is generally used for investigating particle surface charge of cement adsorbed with admixtures [31, 32]. The zeta potential of the blank sample is negative at the initial hydration time, and the absolute value is decreasing during 0 min–60 min. It can be concluded that SG with negative charge is adsorbed on cement grains, and this insoluble layer of big SG ions hinders the access of water to the cement particles; thus, the zeta potential of samples added with SG remains negative during 0 min–60 min [33]. And then zeta potential becomes positive, and the absolute value shows increasing trend constantly during 60–120 min. It is because of the increase in Ca2+ concentration in pore solution of the blank sample; meanwhile, the resultant positive hydration products are encapsuled cement particle [34]. Furthermore, the cement particle surface charges become positive at the hydration of 120 min. It is attributed that SG cannot prevent the cement hydration absolutely, and the hydration products with positive potential are formed and wraps up cement particles.

3.5. Hydration Heat Analysis

The curves for hydration heat and evolution rate of cement added with SG are shown in Figure 7. As seen in Figure 7(a), it is obvious that SG can reduce cumulative hydration heat at some degrees. Specifically, the cumulative hydration heat values during 168 h of sample SG-6 and sample SG-10 are 9.6% and 4.5% lower than the blank sample, respectively. The hydration cumulative heat of sample SG-6 is less than that of the sample SG-10 at the hydration time ranging from 0 h to104.4 h, but the cumulative heat of sample SG-10 exceeds that of the sample SG-6 when the hydration time is above 104.4 h. It can be seen from Figure 7(b), SG delays the occurrence time of the heat evolution peak. The heat evolution peak occurrence time of sample SG-6 and sample SG-10 prolongs 29.4 h and 43.9 h, respectively. In addition, the evolution rate peak values of sample SG-6 and sample SG-10 are 15.4% and 12.6% lower than the blank sample, respectively. It is very interesting that the value of the evolution rate peak of sample SG-10 is even higher than that of the sample SG-6.

(a)

(b)

3.6. XRD Analysis

The XRD patterns of hydrated cement with the addition of SG at 1 d and 7 d are exhibited in Figure 8. For further studying the diffraction peak characteristics, the integrated results of XRD diffraction peak of CH, Aft, and C₃S are investigated by software MDI Jade 6.5, and the results are shown in Tables 5–7, respectively. It is very interesting that the AFt amount of samples added with different dosages of SG shows very different trend. Specifically, the AFt amount of sample SG-6 is 1.51 times that of the blank sample at 1 d. However, the AFt amount of sample SG-10 is only 0.40 times that of that blank sample at 1 d. It indicates that SG plays different roles on AFt formation in the case of different dosage additions at induction period. SG promotes the AFt formation in the case of lower addition (＜0.06%) at the induction period, but it inhibits the AFt formation in the case of higher dosage.

(a)

(b)

As it can be seen in Table 6, SG inhibits the formation of CH at different degrees. It presents the tendency that the higher the addition dosage of SG, the more significant the effect of inhibiting the formation of CH. C₃S is the main phase in ordinary Portland cement, and it is widely considered that CH is mainly formed from the hydration of C₃S [35]. Similarly, the amount of unhydrated C₃S presents very different trend at different hydration time. Specifically, the C₃S amount of the blank sample is 0.99 times and 0.73 times of sample SG-6 and sample SG-10, respectively, at 1 d. Nevertheless, this ratio values become equivalent to 1.03 times and 1.06 times, respectively, at 7 d. It indicates that SG inhibits hydration of C₃S at early hydration process (＜1 d), but it promotes C₃S hydration when the hydration time is beyond 1 d. At the same time, the higher the dosage of SG addition, the more significant promotion of C₃S hydration when the hydration time is beyond 1 d.

3.7. Thermogravimetry Analysis

The DTG curves and the content of CH in hydrated cement pastes are discussed in this part, and the results are given in Figure 9. It can be seen in Figure 9(b) that the amount of CH in the blank sample is more than that of the sample SG-6 at 1 d, but the amount of CH in the blank sample is less than that of the sample SG-6 at 7 d and 28 d. To be more specific, the amounts of CH in blank sample are 1.04 times, 0.85 times, and 0.98 times that of SG-6 sample at 1 d, 7 d, and 28 d, respectively. It once again shows that SG inhibits the CH formation at early hydration process (＜1 d); instead, it promotes the CH formation during 1 d to 7 d. It also means that SG promotes the hydration of C₃S when the hydration time is beyond 1 d. This result is consistent with the conclusion of XRD analysis in Section 3.6.

(a)

(b)

4. Discussion

According to the results of hydration behavior study above, the effect of SG on cement hydration behavior is complex. The roles of SG play on cement hydration depend on both the hydration time and the addition dosage of SG. SG inhibits the hydration of C₃S and the formation of CH at the early hydration period. However, it promotes the C₃S hydration when hydration time is beyond 1 d. Meanwhile, the higher the addition dosage of SG, the more significant the promotion of C₃S hydration when the hydration time is beyond 1 d.

At the same time, SG promotes the AFt formation in the case of lower addition (＜0.06%) at the induction period, but it inhibits the AFt formation in the case of higher dosage (＞0.06%). Based on this property of SG, the fluidity and mechanical performance of cement pastes added with SG also depend on the addition dosage. The initial fluidity and the fluidity loss of the cement pastes at the dosage of 0.06% exhibit the most outstanding performance in this study. However, some negative impacts on cement pastes’ fluidity occur at the addition dosage more than 0.06%.

This study only refers to the study on the effects of SG on hydration behavior of ordinary Portland cement. And many mechanisms are still unclear, such as the mechanism of drastic retarding effect of SG at higher temperature, the AFt formation mechanism at initial hydration age (＜30 min) in the case of different addition dosages, and the adsorption kinetics of SG.

5. Conclusions

(1)The setting time and dosage of cement pastes added with SG present good linear relationship at the dosages ranging from 0.02% to 0.15% curing in the temperature of 20°C. SG is difficult to maintain significant retarding effect at higher temperature (>35°C).(2)SG is able to reduce the cement cumulative hydration heat and delay the occurrence time of heat evolution peak at some degrees, but it has little impact on reducing the cement evolution rate peak. The mechanical and dispersion properties of cement pastes added with SG are depending on their additions. SG has positive effects on the compressive strength at the dosage less than 0.15%, and the negative effects occur if the dosages exceed the limitation dosage.(3)SG plays different roles on cement hydration in the case of different hydration time and different addition dosages. That is to say, SG inhibits the hydration of C₃S and the formation of CH at the early hydration period. But it promotes the C₃S hydration when hydration time is beyond 1 d. Similarly, SG promotes AFt formation in the case of lower addition (＜0.06%) at the induction period, but it inhibits the AFt formation in the case of higher dosage (>0.06%).(4)The retarding effect of SG on cement hydration in this study may be ascribed by mineral surface adsorption and poisoning on the nucleation and growth of CH. The accelerated AFt formation in the case of lower addition of SG can be attributed to the sulfate ions’ promotion to react with C₃A [20].

The mechanism of hydration behavior of cement added with SG, i.e., depending on hydration time and the SG addition dosages, will deeply be investigated in the future studies. The effects of SG on cement minerals’, C₃S and C₃A, hydration will also be deeply investigated in the future studies. It will focus on the effects of SG on C₃S and C₃A hydration product types, amounts, space distribution, and microstructure.

Data Availability

The authors declare the data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the support from the National Key R&D Program of China (2016YFB0303601), National Natural Science Foundation of China (51579019, 51779019, and 51809017), the Central Non-Profit Scientific Research Fund for Institutes (grant no. CKSF2019200/CL), and China Three Gorges Corporation Research Project (BHT0807).

References

B. Li, X. Lv, W. Yunquan, and J. Zhang, “Effect of amino trimethylene phosphonic acid on hydration of portland cement,” Journal of Building Materials, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 417–423, 2016, in Chinese.
View at: Google Scholar
J. Rickert and G. Thielen, “Influence of a long-term retarder on the hydration of clinker and cement,” Cement Concrete Aggregate, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 92–101, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Yang, C. Zhang, Y. Guo, and Z. Llu, “Study on retarding the set of sulphoaluminate cement,” Journal of the Chinese Society, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 155–160, 2002, in Chinese.
View at: Google Scholar
X. Kong, Z. Lu, J. Shi, D. Wang, S. Hou, and H. Liu, “Impacts of phosphoric acid and phosphates on hydration kinetics of Portland cement,” Journal of the Chinese Society, vol. 40, no. 11, pp. 1553–1558, 2012, in Chinese.
View at: Google Scholar
A. Peschard, A. Govin, J. Pourchez et al., “Effect of polysaccharides on the hydration of cement suspension,” Journal of the European Ceramic Society, vol. 26, no. 8, pp. 1439–1445, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Pyatina and T. Sugama, ““High-temperature alkaline stability of cement set retarders and their performance at 70–90°C,” Advances in Cement Research, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 25–35, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Li, T. He, and Y. Wu, “Effect of sodium gluconate on the fluidity and flow loss of pastes with β-naphthalenesulfonic acid-based superplasticizer,” Journal of the Chinese Society, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 768–773, 2010, in Chinese.
View at: Google Scholar
J. Cheung, A. Jeknavorian, L. Roberts, and D. Silva, “Impact of admixtures on the hydration kinetics of Portland cement,” Cement and Concrete Research, vol. 41, no. 12, pp. 1289–1309, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Zou, H. Tan, Y. Guo, B. Ma, X. He, and Y. Zhou, “Effect of sodium gluconate on dispersion of polycarboxylate superplasticizer with different grafting density in side chain,” Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, vol. 55, pp. 91–100, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Li, Y. Li, C. Shi, Q. Wang, and C. Chen, “Influence of retarder on the fluidity and strength of the sulphate aluminium cement paste containing naphthalene based superplasticizer,” Bulletin of the Chinese Ceramic Society, vol. 33, no. 12, pp. 3295–3299, 2014.
View at: Google Scholar
B. Ma, G. Li, X. Li et al., “Study on the effects by compounding the polycarboxylic type superplasticizer with sodium gluconate,” Journal of Wuhan University of Technology, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 52–55, 2011.
View at: Google Scholar
H. Tan, F. Zou, B. Ma, Y. Guo, X. Li, and J. Mei, “Effect of competitive adsorption between sodium gluconate and polycarboxylate superplasticizer on rheology of cement paste,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 144, pp. 338–346, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Ma, W. Li, S. Zhang, D. Ge, J. Yu, and X. Shen, “Influence of sodium gluconate on the performance and hydration of portland cement,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 91, no. 5, pp. 138–144, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. E. Hekal and E. A. Kishar, “Effect of sodium salt of naphthalene-formaldehyde polycondensate on ettringite formation,” Cement and Concrete Research, vol. 29, no. 10, pp. 1535–1540, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Bishop and A. R. Barron, “Cement hydration inhibition with sucrose, tartaric acid, and lignosulfonate: analytical and spectroscopic study,” Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, vol. 45, no. 21, pp. 7042–7049, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Zhang, Y. He, C. Lu, and Z. Huang, “Effects of sodium gluconate on early hydration and mortar performance of Portland cement-calcium aluminate cement-anhydrite binder,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 157, pp. 1065–1073, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. P. Perez, “The mechanism of action of sodium gluconate on the fluidity and set of portland cement,” in Proceedings of the 12th International Congress on the Chemistry of Cement, Montreal, Canada, July 2007.
View at: Google Scholar
H. von Daake and D. Stephan, “Impact of retarders by controlled addition on the setting, early hydration and microstructural development of different cements,” Magazine of Concrete Research, vol. 68, no. 19, pp. 1011–1024, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Ma, G. Li, X. Li et al., “Study on the effects by compounding the polycarboxylic type superplasticizer with sodium gluconate,” Journal of Wuhan University of Technology, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 50–53, 2011, in Chinese.
View at: Google Scholar
Y. Wu, T. He, F. Shen et al., “Influences of the compounding of sodium gluconate with superplasticizer on the process of cement hydration,” Journal of Xi’an University of Architect &Technology (Natural Science Edition), vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 806–809, 2008, in Chinese.
View at: Google Scholar
W. Huang, H. Kazemi-Kamyab, W. Sun, and K. Scrivener, “Effect of cement substitution by limestone on the hydration and microstructural development of ultra-high performance concrete (UHPC),” Cement and Concrete Composites, vol. 77, pp. 86–101, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. Shah, K. Scrivener, B. Bhattacharjee, and S. Bishnoi, “Changes in microstructure characteristics of cement paste on carbonation,” Cement and Concrete Research, vol. 109, pp. 184–197, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Wang, X.-G. Li, and P.-M. Wang, “Influence of polymer on cement hydration in SBR-modified cement pastes,” Cement and Concrete Research, vol. 36, no. 9, pp. 1744–1751, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Peschard, A. Govin, P. Grosseau, B. Guilhot, and R. Guyonnet, “Effect of polysaccharides on the hydration of cement paste at early ages,” Cement and Concrete Research, vol. 34, no. 11, pp. 2153–2158, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Salahaldein, “Effects of super plasticizing and retarding admixtures on properties of concrete,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Innovations in Engineering and Technology, pp. 271–274, Seoul, South Korea, November 2013.
View at: Google Scholar
B. Li, X. Lv, Y. Dong, S. Zhou, and J. Zhang, “Comparison of the retarding mechanisms of sodium gluconate and amino trimethylene phosphonic acid on cement hydration and the influence on cement performance,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 168, pp. 958–965, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Lv, B. Li, Y. Shi et al., “Comparison of the influence of amino trimethylene phosphonic acid and sodium gluconate on the performance of concrete,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Architectural, Civil and Hydraulics Engineering, vol. 44, pp. 1–8, Guangzhou, China, November 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. He, F. Shen, and F. C. Wang, “Influences of combination of superplasticizers and retarders on process of cement hydration,” Journal of Chinese Ceramic Society, vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 796–800, 2007, in Chinese.
View at: Google Scholar
G. Zhang, G. Li, and Y. Li, “Effects of superplasticizers and retarders on the fluidity and strength of sulphoaluminate cement,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 126, pp. 44–54, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Dalas, S. Pourchet, A. Nonat, D. Rinaldi, S. Sabio, and M. Mosquet, “Fluidizing efficiency of comb-like superplasticizers: the effect of the anionic function, the side chain length and the grafting degree,” Cement and Concrete Research, vol. 71, pp. 115–123, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Plank and C. Hirsch, “Impact of zeta potential of early cement hydration phases on superplasticizer adsorption,” Cement and Concrete Research, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 537–542, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Srinivasan, S. A. Barbhuiya, D. Charan, and S. P. Pandey, “Characterising cement-superplasticiser interaction using zeta potential measurements,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 24, no. 12, pp. 2517–2521, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Kurdowski, Cement and Concrete Chemistry, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2014.
L. Nachbaur, P.-C. Nkinamubanzi, A. Nonat, and J.-C. Mutin, “Electrokinetic properties which control the coagulation of silicate cement suspensions during early age hydration,” Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, vol. 202, no. 2, pp. 261–268, 1998.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. O. Kjellsen and B. Lagerblad, “Microstructure of tricalcium silicate and portland cement systems at middle periods of hydration-development of Hadley grains,” Cement and Concrete Research, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 13–20, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2020 Xingdong Lv et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

2735

Downloads

1234

Citations