Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Biomedicine and Biotechnology
Volume 2011, Article ID 469481, 8 pages
Research Article

Effects of Clofibrate on Salt Loading-Induced Hypertension in Rats

1Departamento de Fisiología, Facultad de Medicina, 18012 Granada, Spain
2Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves, Unidad Experimental, 18014 Granada, Spain
3UGC-Olula del Río, 4860 Almeria, Spain
4Departamento de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad de Jaén, 23071 Jaén, Spain

Received 21 June 2010; Accepted 2 October 2010

Academic Editor: Andrea Vecchione

Copyright © 2011 Antonio Cruz et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


The effects of clofibrate on the hemodynamic and renal manifestations of increased saline intake were analyzed. Four groups of male Wistar rats were treated for five weeks: control, clofibrate (240 mg/kg/day), salt (2% via drinking water), and . Body weight, systolic blood pressure (SBP), and heart rate (HR) were recorded weekly. Finally, SBP, HR, and morphologic, metabolic, plasma, and renal variables were measured. Salt increased SBP, HR, urinary isoprostanes, NOx, ET, vasopressin and proteinuria and reduced plasma free ( ) and tissue and versus control rats. Clofibrate prevented the increase in SBP produced by salt administration, reduced the sodium balance, and further reduced plasma and tissue thyroid hormone levels. However, clofibrate did not modify the relative cardiac mass, NOx, urinary ET, and vasopressin of saline-loaded rats. In conclusion, chronic clofibrate administration prevented the blood pressure elevation of salt-loaded rats by decreasing sodium balance and reducing thyroid hormone levels.

1. Introduction

Fibrates are synthetic agonists of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor- (PPAR ), a subfamily of the nuclear receptor superfamily naturally activated by ligands such as free fatty acids and eicosanoids [1]. PPAR is expressed in the liver and in tissues with highly active fatty acid metabolism, such as the heart, kidney, endothelium, and vascular smooth muscle, all primarily related to blood pressure (BP) control. Fibrates have been in clinical use as hypolipidemic agents for several decades. More recently, they have been reported to have beneficial effects on cardiovascular function [13] and elevated BP [4, 5]. Fibrates also exert antithyroid effects. PPAR agonists interact with thyroid receptors (TRs) in part by sharing binding sites and heterodimeric partners such as RXRs [68]. PPARs and TRs also share coactivators. In addition, the activation of response elements by TRs and PPARs is modulated by PPAR agonists [8]. The molecular mechanisms of the negative interaction between thyroid hormone and PPARs include an increase in thyroid hormone deactivation [9] and reductions in the gene expression of their transporters [1012] and in the activity of deiodinases [10] and action [6, 8, 1012]. Thus, clofibrate treatment markedly reduced plasma thyroid hormone levels and increased tissue activity of phenol-UGT, an enzyme that deactivates thyroid hormones in chronically treated hyperthyroid rats [13].

The antihypertensive effects of clofibrate-induced PPAR activation may include the following: higher production of endothelial [14] and renal [15] nitric oxide, which plays an important homeostatic role in the response to an increased saline intake [16]; lower production of reactive oxygen species and reduced NAD(P)H oxidase activity [3], which are increased in saline drinking rats [17]; lower production of ET-1 [3] also elevated in saline models of experimental hypertension [3, 18]. Moreover, the mechanism responsible for the protective effects of clofibrate on the development of hypertension may also be linked to its antithyroid actions, since antithyroid drugs have prevented BP elevation in all experimental rat models of hypertension studied to date [19]. In this regard, we recently reported [13] that chronic clofibrate treatment prevented and reversed the characteristic hemodynamic manifestations, increased temperature of hyperthyroidism in rats, and reduced their plasma thyroid hormone levels.

All of the above data indicate that PPAR activation can have important protective effects on cardiovascular function and interfere with the prohypertensive effects of increased saline intake, but the precise mechanisms involved have not been elucidated. In this study, we analyzed the putative role of several factors, focusing the investigation on the antithyroid effects of clofibrate.

2. Methods

2.1. Animals

Thirty-two male Wistar rats born and raised in the experimental animal service of the University of Granada were used. The experiment was performed according to European Union guidelines for the ethical care of animals. Rats initially weighing  g were randomly assigned to the different groups. Each experimental group comprised eight animals. All rats had free access to food and tap water. Clofibrate (240 mg/kg/day) was given by gavage because of the low solubility of this compound. The dose of clofibrate was in accordance with previously published protocols used in experimental hypertension in rats [3, 13].

2.2. Experimental Protocol

The groups were: control, clofibrate-treated, salt-loaded (2% NaCl via drinking water), and clofibrate plus salt-treated rats. Treatments were administered for five weeks. Body weight (BW), tail systolic BP (SBP), and heart rate (HR) were measured once a week. Tail SBP and HR were measured with the use of tail-cuff plethysmography in unanesthetized rats (LE 5001-Pressure Meter, Letica SA, Barcelona, Spain).

When the experimental period was completed, all rats were then housed in metabolic cages (Panlab, Barcelona, Spain) with free access to food and water for a four-day period (two days for adaptation two experimental days), during which food and water intakes were measured, and urine samples were collected. Twenty-four-hour urine volume, proteinuria, creatinine, isoprostanes, nitrate-nitrites, endothelin (ET), vasopressin (VP), and total sodium, potassium, and calcium excretion were measured. Mean values of all intake and urinary variables obtained during the two experimental days were used for statistical analyses among groups.

After completion of the metabolic study, the rats were anesthetized with ethyl ether. A polyethylene catheter (PE-50) containing 100 units of heparin in isotonic sterile NaCl solution was inserted into the femoral artery to measure intra-arterial BP and HR and pulse pressure (PP) in conscious rats and to extract blood samples. Intra-arterial BP was measured at 24 h after implantation of femoral catheter. Direct BP and HR were recorded continuously for 60 min with a sampling frequency of 400/s (McLab, AD Instruments, Hastings, UK); BP and HR values obtained during the last 30 min were averaged for intergroup comparisons. Subsequently, blood samples taken with the femoral catheter were used to determine plasma variables. The plasma variables measured were: urea, creatinine, total proteins, electrolytes (sodium and potassium), thyroid hormones ( and ), and thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH).

Finally, the rats were killed by exsanguination, and the thyroid, liver, kidneys, and ventricles were removed and weighed. The heart was divided into right ventricle and left ventricle plus septum and the kidney was dissected to separate cortex and medulla. Tissue and levels were measured in liver and renal cortex and medulla.

2.3. Analytical Procedures

Proteinuria was measured by the method of Bradford [20]. Plasma and urinary electrolytes and creatinine were measured in an autoanalyzer (Hitachi-912, Roche, Spain). Plasma and tissue levels of thyroid hormones (free circulating and ) were determined using rat radioimmunoassay kits according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Diagnostic Products Corporation, Los Angeles, CA, USA). An enzyme immunoassay kit (8-isoprostane EIA Kit, Cayman Ann Arbor, MI, USA) was used to measure urinary 8-isoprostane levels, and samples were previously purified using the Affinity purification kit (Cayman). Immunoreactive urinary ET and VP levels were measured with a radioimmunoassay kit purchased from Assay designs, (Ann Arbor, MI, USA). Urine and (NOx) concentrations were measured using nitrate reductase and Griess reaction [21]. Rat plasma TSH was measured by a solid phase competitive chemiluminiscent enzyme immunoassay using the IMMULITE 2000 Analyzer (EURO/DPC, Llanberis, Gwynedd, UK).

2.4. Preparation of the Tissue Homogenates

For thyroid hormone measurements, the liver and the dissected renal cortex and medulla were homogenized with a glass homogenizer in ice-cold HEPES buffer containing (mmol/L) sodium HEPES 25, EDTA 1, phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride 0.1, and PBS. After centrifugation of the homogenate at 6000 g for 5 min at C, the supernatant containing membrane and cytosolic components, termed homogenate, was separated into aliquots, frozen in liquid , and stored at until use.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

One-way ANOVA was used to compare each variable at the end of the experiment. When the overall ANOVA was significant, pairwise comparisons were performed using Bonferroni's methods. was considered significant.

3. Results

3.1. Blood Pressure and Heart Rate

BP and HR values are summarized in Figure 1. The left-hand graph in Figure 1 shows the final SBP and the right-hand graph shows the final HR measured by direct recording in the experimental groups. Saline loading produced an increase in SBP and HR and PP in comparison to control rats. Clofibrate administration to normal rats at the dose and time used in this experiment produced a modest but significant decrease in BP (  mmHg) and HR (  beats/min). Clofibrate administration to saline-loaded rats reduced SBP, HR (  mmHg and  beats/min, respectively, versus saline-drinking rats for both variables), and PP values. Hence, the salt + clofibrate group showed similar final SBP, HR, and PP values to those of control rats. PP values in the groups were: control, ; clofibrate, ; salt, ; salt+clofibrate, ( versus controls; versus saline group).

Figure 1: Final systolic blood pressure (SBP) and heart rate (HR) measured by direct recording (femoral artery) in conscious rats at the end of the experimental period (five weeks). Data are . ; compared with controls; compared with the salt group.
3.2. Morphological Variables

Body weight at the end of the five-week study period was significantly lower in the salt and clofibrate + salt groups than in controls. Absolute kidney weight was significantly increased and the absolute left ventricular weight was reduced in the salt + clofibrate group. Kidney-to-body weight ratio was significantly increased in the clofibrate and salt groups and was markedly increased in the clofibrate + salt group. Left ventricular-to-body weight and left ventricular-to-right ventricular ratios, both indexes of cardiac hypertrophy, were not significantly modified by the treatments. The thyroid weight-to-body weight ratio was not significantly modified in the groups. The liver-to-body weight ratio was significantly increased in the clofibrate group but showed only a nonsignificant increase in the salt   clofibrate group (Table 1).

Table 1: Morphologic variables in the experimental groups.
3.3. Plasma Variables and Thyroid Hormone Levels

Plasma sodium and potassium levels were similar among the control, clofibrate, and salt groups, but plasma sodium was higher and potassium lower in the clofibrate + salt group. Plasma urea and creatinine were similar in all groups, and plasma protein, an index of plasma volume, was also similar in all groups (Table 2).

Table 2: Plasma variables in the experimental groups.

values were significantly decreased in the clofibrate + salt group but did not differ among the other groups. However, levels were significantly reduced in the clofibrate and salt groups, especially in the salt + clofibrate group. TSH values were increased and decreased in the clofibrate and salt groups, respectively, and were not significantly modified in the salt + clofibrate group (Table 2).

3.3.1. Metabolic and Urinary Variables

Metabolic studies at the end of treatment showed increased food and fluid intake (g/100 g body weight) in the salt-treated group in comparison with controls. Clofibrate treatment did not affect food and fluid intake in normal rats but reduced the food intake in saline-loaded rats (Table 3). Water and sodium balances were increased in the salt group. Clofibrate reduced water and sodium balances in saline-loaded rats (Table 3).

Table 3: Metabolic variables in the experimental groups.

Table 4 lists the results for the urinary variables. The salt group showed increased diuresis, natriuresis, kaliuresis, and calciuresis. Clofibrate did not significantly modify these variables in control rats but increased the diuresis, natriuresis, and kaliuresis and reduced the calciuresis in saline-loaded rats. Total creatinine excretion and creatinine clearance were similar in all groups.

Table 4: Urinary variables in experimental groups.

Proteinuria was increased in the salt group, and clofibrate reduced this variable in control and saline-drinking rats. Total isoprostane and NOx excretion were increased in the salt group, and clofibrate did not significantly modify these variables in control or salt-loaded rats. Total immunoreactive ET and VP excretion were increased in the salt group, and clofibrate did not modify these variables in control and salt-loaded rats.

3.4. Tissue Thyroid Hormone Levels

These results are summarized in Figure 2. Except for in the clofibrate group, and values were significantly reduced in the liver in all experimental groups with respect to controls, observing the greatest reduction in the salt + clofibrate group. In the renal cortex, a significant reduction in was only observed in the salt + clofibrate group, while was decreased in all groups, especially in the salt + clofibrate group. In the renal medulla, and were reduced in the salt-loaded group and more markedly reduced in the salt + clofibrate group. The salt + clofibrate and salt groups significantly differed in and values in all tissues.

Figure 2: Tissue levels of free and free ( and ) in the experimental groups after five weeks of treatment. Data are . compared with controls. compared with the salt group.

4. Discussion

The main findings of this study were that chronic clofibrate administration to salt-loaded rats prevented the BP increase in these animals and that this effect may be mediated by the antithyroid action of fibrates. Clofibrate treatment markedly reduced plasma and tissue thyroid hormone levels in saline-treated rats. These findings are in agreement with previous observations by our group in hyperthyroid rats [13]. A fibrate-induced reduction in thyroid hormone levels may be protective against hypertension in saline-loaded rats, since antithyroid drugs are known to prevent the development of hypertension in rats [19]. We also found that clofibrate reduced the water and sodium balance in saline-loaded rats with respect to saline-drinking rats, which may also contribute to its antihypertensive effect. However, clofibrate did not significantly change nitrite/nitrate, isoprostane, ET, or VP levels, suggesting that these variables do not play a role in the prevention of saline load hypertension induced by this agent.

An increase in BP in response to dietary sodium (salt sensitivity) is considered an important factor in the pathogenesis of hypertension in humans [22]. In the present study, chronic 2% NaCl loading via drinking water produced a moderate BP increase (15 mmHg) in male Wistar rats, in agreement with several reports in Sprague-Dawley rats [3, 1824]. However, other studies found no significant change in BP with salt loading in Sprague-Dawley rats [25, 26]. These discrepancies may reflect differences in the duration of saline loading or in the administration route (with food or fluid intake).

The antihypertensive effect of clofibrate in the saline-loaded rats is consistent with previous reports of the attenuation by fibrates of BP elevation in genetic models of hypertension [5] and in nitric oxide-deficient and DOCA salt-treated hypertensive mice and rats [3].

In this study, clofibrate produced a modest but significant BP reduction in untreated rats, which was also associated with a reduction in plasma levels and a significant decrease in tissue thyroid hormone levels. These data contrast with the normal BP and plasma thyroid hormone levels observed in normal rats treated with clofibrate at the same dose for three weeks [13] but are in agreement with previous reports that fibrates reduce thyroid hormone levels in several species [10, 27, 28]. The discrepancy with our previous results suggests that more than three weeks may be required to observe the antithyroid effects of clofibrate at the dose used in our study.

The saline-treated rats showed reduced plasma and tissue levels of thyroid hormones, consonant with the decrease in thyroid hormone levels reported in saline models of hypertension [29, 30]. This reduced thyroid activity reported in low-renin hypertension is believed to be mediated by the action of an unidentified substance referred to as the “thyroid-depressing factor” by Threatte et al. [31]. This substance reduces the uptake and binding of 131I by the thyroid gland and blocks the 131I uptake stimulated by TSH [32], and it was found to be increased in the blood of hypertensive versus normotensive rats [32]. More recently, several authors reported that low plasma thyroid hormone levels are the expression of an inflammatory state in patients with chronic renal disease [33] and that plasma and liver thyroid hormone levels are reduced in uremic rats with reduced renal mass [34]. This thyroid abnormality is referred to as “the euthyroid sick syndrome”, which can also be produced by elevated saline intake, as indicated by the present data.

Nitric oxide (NO) plays an important role in renal function and sodium excretion and regulates the homeostatic response to an increased sodium intake [16]. Thus, Shultz and Tolins [16] showed that high salt intake in rats for 2 weeks resulted in increased serum concentration and urinary excretion of the NO decomposition products (NOx) and more recently, salt loading has been used even as an activator of NO production [15]. In consonance with this, the present study confirms that increase renal NOx production is seen following high dietary salt intake. Clofibrate has also been reported to increase renal NO production as measured by the urinary excretion of nitrite [15]. In the present study, however, clofibrate alone did not increase NOx production, and the increase in nitrite excretion found with the combination of clofibrate and NaCl was not greater than that produced by salt alone, while Na excretion was further increased in comparison to the NaCl group. The markedly increased natriuresis of the clofibrate-salt group is consistent with the decreased sodium and water balance of these rats and can be produced by clofibrate-stimulated 20-hydroxyeicosatrienoic acid (20-HETE) and epoxyeicosatrienoic acids (EETs) with natriuretic properties [35]. This is because fibrates act as inducers of cytochrome P-450 enzymes [35], which catalyze arachidonic acid for the formation of 20-HETE and 5- and 6-EET, among others.

Interestingly, the salt + clofibrate-treated rats showed increased natriuresis and kaliuresis and reduced water and sodium balance, with higher plasma sodium and lower potassium levels. All of these observations resemble the “exaggerated natriuresis” and electrolytic plasma abnormalities observed in DOCA-salt treated rats, suggesting that clofibrate may produce a positive cross-talk pattern between mineralcorticoid receptors and PPARs at renal level. Thus, PPARs belong to a large superfamily of nuclear hormone receptors that include retinoic acid (RXR), steroids, thyroid hormones, and vitamin D receptors [7, 8]. Steroid and other nuclear hormone receptors can modulate each other’s transcriptional activities. This cross-talk may result in inhibition of mineralcorticoid activity, as observed with thyroid hormones, or in its potentiation, as suggested by the alterations in the clofibrate salt-treated rats.

Our finding of increased urinary excretion of isoprostanes in the saline-loaded group is in agreement with reports that a higher saline intake increases NAD(P)H oxidase activity [17]. Moreover, experimental studies have demonstrated a PPAR activator-mediated reduction in oxidative stress [3]. Thus, bezafibrate reduced l-NAME-induced increases in plasma 8-isoprostane levels, and clofibrate diminished the increased NAD(P)H oxidase activity in DOCA-salt rats [3]. However, clofibrate treatment was unable to reduce the isoprostane levels in our saline-loaded rats, suggesting that clofibrate lacks antioxidant properties under these conditions, probably because the oxidative stress is lower than observed in L-NAME or DOCA-salt hypertension.

Our data show that saline-loaded rats have increased levels of immunoreactive ET and VP. It has been suggested that ET and VP are stimulated in a compensatory manner when the renin-angiotensin system is blunted [36]. Moreover, a role has been proposed for both ET and VP in the development and maintenance of high blood pressure and renal damage in low-renin models of hypertension [37], and a positive interaction between them has also been reported [38]. Evidence of the involvement of renal ET in salt excretion regulation includes findings of a positive correlation between changes in natriuresis and urine ET produced by a salt load [39]. Our data and these observations support participation of this peptide in the regulation of salt balance. Moreover, Newaz et al. [3] reported that clofibrate reduced plasma ET in DOCA/salt hypertensive rats [3]. However, our data show that PPAR activation was unable to modify the urinary levels of ET and of VP in saline load hypertension.

In summary, the present study shows that chronic clofibrate treatment prevents the increased blood pressure of saline-loaded rats. This effect was associated with a marked reduction in plasma and tissue thyroid hormone levels and with a reduced water and sodium balance. However, clofibrate treatment did not affect variables related to nitric oxide, oxidative stress, or ET or VP production. Moreover, clofibrate did not modify the cardiac mass but reduced the proteinuria of these animals.


The authors are grateful to R. Davies for help with the English version. This study was supported by a Grant (CTS-1659) from the Department of Innovation, Science, and Business of the Andalusian Regional Government, and from the Carlos III Health Institute of the Spanish Ministry of Health and Consumer Affairs (Red de Investigación Renal, REDinREN RD06/0016/0017). FEDER “Una manera de hacer Europa.”


  1. S. Mandard, M. Müller, and S. Kersten, “Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α target genes,” Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, vol. 61, no. 4, pp. 393–416, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  2. D. Bishop-Bailey, “Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors in the cardiovascular system,” British Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 129, no. 5, pp. 823–833, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. M. Newaz, A. Blanton, P. Fidelis, and A. Oyekan, “NAD(P)H oxidase/nitric oxide interactions in peroxisome proliferator activated receptor (PPAR)α-mediated cardiovascular effects,” Mutation Research, vol. 579, no. 1-2, pp. 163–171, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  4. M. A. Sánchez-Mendoza, S. O. Martínez-Ayala, J. A. Hernández-Hernández, L. Zúñiga-Sosa, G. Pastelín-Hernández, and B. A. Escalante-Acosta, “Participation of nitric oxide and arachidonic acid metabolites via cytochrome-P450 in the regulation of arterial blood pressure,” Archivos de Cardiologia de Mexico, vol. 73, no. 2, pp. 98–104, 2003. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. R. K. Shatara, D. W. Quest, and T. W. Wilson, “Fenofibrate lowers blood pressure in two genetic models of hypertension,” Canadian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology, vol. 78, no. 5, pp. 367–371, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. S. Bonilla, A. Redonnet, C. Noël-Suberville, R. Groubet, V. Pallet, and P. Higueret, “Effect of a pharmacological activation of PPAR on the expression of RAR and TR in rat liver,” Journal of Physiology and Biochemistry, vol. 57, no. 2, pp. 1–8, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. R. Chu, L. D. Madison, Y. Lin et al., “Thyroid hormone (T3) inhibits ciprofibrate-induced transcription of genes encoding β-oxidation enzymes: cross talk between peroxisome proliferator and T3 signaling pathways,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 92, no. 25, pp. 11593–11597, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. O. M. Hyyti and M. A. Portman, “Molecular mechanisms of cross-talk between thyroid hormone and peroxisome proliferator activated receptors: focus on the heart,” Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 463–469, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  9. K. Jemnitz, Z. Veres, K. Monostory, and L. Vereczkey, “Glucuronidation of thyroxine in primary monolayer cultures of rat hepatocytes: in vitro induction of UDP-glucuronosyltranferases by methylcholanthrene, clofibrate, and dexamethasone alone and in combination,” Drug Metabolism and Disposition, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 34–37, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. S. Luci, H. Kluge, F. Hirche, and K. Eder, “Clofibrate increases hepatic triiodothyronine (T3)- and thyroxine (T4)-glucuronosyltransferase activities and lowers plasma T3 and T4 concentrations in pigs,” Drug Metabolism and Disposition, vol. 34, no. 11, pp. 1887–1892, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  11. K. Motojima, S. Goto, and T. Imanaka, “Specific repression of transthyretin gene expression in rat liver by a peroxisome proliferator clofibrate,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 188, no. 2, pp. 799–806, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. K. Motojima, J. M. Peters, and F. J. Gonzalez, “PPARα mediates peroxisome proliferator-induced transcriptional repression of nonperoxisomal gene expression in mouse,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 230, no. 1, pp. 155–158, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  13. I. Rodríguez-Gómez, A. Cruz, J. M. Moreno, A. Soler, A. Osuna, and F. Vargas, “Clofibrate prevents and reverses the hemodynamic manifestations of hyperthyroidism in rats,” American Journal of Hypertension, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 341–347, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  14. Q. N. Diep, F. Amiri, R. M. Touyz et al., “PPARα activator effects on Ang II-induced vascular oxidative stress and inflammation,” Hypertension, vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 866–871, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. M. A. Newaz, K. Ranganna, and A. O. Oyekan, “Relationship between PPARα activation and NO on proximal tubular Na+ transport in the rat,” BMC Pharmacology, vol. 4, article 1, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  16. P. J. Shultz and J. P. Tolins, “Adaptation to increased dietary salt intake in the rat. Role of endogenous nitric oxide,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 91, no. 2, pp. 642–650, 1993. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. D. M. Lenda, B. A. Sauls, and M. A. Boegehold, “Reactive oxygen species may contribute to reduced endothelium-dependent dilation in rats fed high salt,” American Journal of Physiology, vol. 279, no. 1, pp. H7–H14, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. E. Miyajima and R. D. Buñag, “Dietary salt loading produces baroreflex impairment and mild hypertension in rats,” American Journal of Physiology, vol. 249, no. 2, pp. H278–284, 1985. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. F. Vargas, J. M. Moreno, I. Rodríguez-Gómez et al., “Vascular and renal function in experimental thyroid disorders,” European Journal of Endocrinology, vol. 154, no. 2, pp. 197–212, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  20. M. M. Bradford, “A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein dye binding,” Analytical Biochemistry, vol. 72, no. 1-2, pp. 248–254, 1976. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. D. L. Granger, R. R. Taintor, K. S. Boockvar, and J. B. Hibbs Jr., “Measurement of nitrate and nitrite in biological samples using nitrate reductase and Griess reaction,” Methods in Enzymology, vol. 268, pp. 142–151, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. V. M. Campese, “Salt sensitivity in hypertension: renal and cardiovascular implications,” Hypertension, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 531–550, 1994. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. Z. Ni and N. D. Vaziri, “Effect of salt loading on nitric oxide synthase expression in normotensive rats,” American Journal of Hypertension, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 155–163, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. C. Wang, C. Chao, L.-M. Chen, L. Chao, and J. Chao, “High-salt diet upregulates kininogen and downregulates tissue kallikrein expression in Dahl-SS and SHR rats,” American Journal of Physiology, vol. 271, no. 4, pp. F824–F830, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. W. Debinski, O. Kuchel, N. T. Buu, M. Nemer, J. Tremblay, and P. Hamet, “Effect of prolonged high salt diet on atrial natriuretic factor in rats,” Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine, vol. 194, no. 3, pp. 251–257, 1990. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. J. W. Osborn and B. J. Hornfeldt, “Arterial baroreceptor denervation impairs long-term regulation of arterial pressure during dietary salt loading,” American Journal of Physiology, vol. 275, no. 5, pp. H1558–H1566, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. C. Viollon-Abadie, D. Lassere, E. Debruyne, L. Nicod, N. Carmichael, and L. Richert, “Phenobarbital, β-naphthoflavone, clofibrate, and pregnenolone-16α- carbonitrile do not affect hepatic thyroid hormone UDP-glucuronosyl transferase activity, and thyroid gland function in mice,” Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, vol. 155, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  28. T. J. Visser, E. Kaptein, H. van Toor et al., “Glucuronidation of thyroid hormone in rat liver: effects of in vivo treatment with microsomal enzyme inducers and in vitro assay conditions,” Endocrinology, vol. 133, no. 5, pp. 2177–2186, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. R. P. McPartland and J. P. Rapp, “(Na+,K+)-activated adenosinetriphosphatase and hypertension in Dahl salt-sensitive and -resistant rats,” Clinical and Experimental Hypertension, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 379–391, 1982. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. F. Vargas, C. García del Rio, J. D. Luna, J. M. Haro, and C. Osorio, “Studies on thyroid activity in deoxycorticosterone-salt and Goldblatt two-kidney, one-clip hypertensive rats,” Acta Endocrinologica, vol. 118, no. 1, pp. 22–30, 1988. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. R. M. Threatte, M. J. Fregly, and F. P. Field, “Interrelationships among blood pressure, renal function, thyroid activity and renal thyroid depressing factor in renal hypertensive rats,” Pharmacology, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 201–210, 1982. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. M. J. Fregly and R. M. Threatte, “Renal-thyroid interrelationship in normotensive and hypertensive rats,” Life Sciences, vol. 30, no. 7-8, pp. 589–599, 1982. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. C. Zoccali, G. Tripepi, S. Cutrupi, P. Pizzini, and F. Mallamaci, “Low triiodothyronine: a new facet of inflammation in end-stage renal disease,” Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, vol. 16, no. 9, pp. 2789–2795, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  34. V. S. Lim, C. Henriquez, H. Seo, S. Refetoff, and E. Martino, “Thyroid function in a uremic rat model. Evidence suggesting tissue hypothyroidism,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 66, no. 5, pp. 946–954, 1980. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. R. J. Roman, “P-450 metabolites of arachidonic acid in the control of cardiovascular function,” Physiological Reviews, vol. 82, no. 1, pp. 131–185, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. C. Letizia, S. Cerci, G. De Toma et al., “High plasma endothelin-1 levels in hypertensive patients with low-renin essential hypertension,” Journal of Human Hypertension, vol. 11, no. 7, pp. 447–451, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. E. L. Schiffrin, “Role of endothelin-1 in hypertension and vascular disease,” American Journal of Hypertension, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 83S–89S, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. T. Imai, Y. Hirata, T. Emori, M. Yanagisawa, T. Masaki, and F. Marumo, “Induction of endothelin-1 gene by angiotensin and vasopressin in endothelial cells,” Hypertension, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 753–757, 1992. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. F. Cuzzola, F. Mallamaci, G. Tripepi et al., “Urinary adrenomedullin is related to ET-1 and salt intake in patients with mild essential hypertension,” American Journal of Hypertension, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 224–230, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus