BioMed Research International

BioMed Research International / 2013 / Article
Special Issue

Translational Neuroimaging of the Mood and Anxiety Disorders

View this Special Issue

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2013 |Article ID 635131 | 8 pages | https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/635131

GRIN2B Gene and Associated Brain Cortical White Matter Changes in Bipolar Disorder: A Preliminary Combined Platform Investigation

Academic Editor: Qiyong Gong
Received09 Oct 2013
Revised04 Dec 2013
Accepted05 Dec 2013
Published30 Dec 2013

Abstract

Abnormalities in glutamate signaling and glutamate toxicity are thought to be important in the pathophysiology of bipolar disorder (BD). Whilst previous studies have found brain white matter changes in BD, there is paucity of data about how glutamatergic genes affect brain white matter integrity in BD. Based on extant neuroimaging data, we hypothesized that GRIN2B risk allele is associated with reductions of brain white matter integrity in the frontal, parietal, temporal, and occipital regions and cingulate gyrus in BD. Fourteen patients with BD and 22 healthy controls matched in terms of age, gender and handedness were genotyped using blood samples and underwent diffusion tensor imaging. Compared to G allele, brain FA values were significantly lower in BD patients with risk T allele in left frontal region ( ), right frontal region ( ), left parietal region ( ), left occipital region ( ), right occipital region ( ), and left cingulate gyrus ( ). Further elucidation of the interactions between different glutamate genes and their relationships with such structural, functional brain substrates will enhance our understanding of the link between dysregulated glutamatergic neurotransmission and neuroimaging endophenotypes in BD.

1. Introduction

Glutamate (Glu) is an excitatory neurotransmitter that is involved in important neural processes such as synaptic plasticity, neuronal development, and toxicity [1, 2]. Several studies have suggested that the abnormalities in glutamatergic function and signaling pathways through the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors are involved in the pathophysiology of bipolar disorder (BD), a debilitating psychiatric illness characterized by alternating and often recurring episodes of mania or hypomania and depression [1, 36]. It was previously thought that mood stabilisers such as lithium and valproate exert their neuroprotective effects through reducing NMDA receptor-induced excitotoxicity [46]. Within the glutamatergic receptor, the NR2B subunit is a critical structural and functional component of the NMDA receptor. Encoded by the GRIN2B gene, which is located at 12p12 and 419 kb in size, this subunit is expressed in the cortical and medial temporal parts of the brain, striatum, and olfactory bulb [7, 8]. Earlier studies have explored the relationship between GRIN2B gene and BD [912]. A genetic study of Italian patients with BD found linkage to marker D12S364 at locus 12p12 within the GRIN2B gene [9]. Another study of 440 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) from 64 candidate genes among Ashkenazi Jewish case-parent trios with bipolar I disorder noted the aforementioned association of GRIN2B with BD [10], and this was confirmed by a follow up study [11]. Genetic association studies have shown significant association between the 3′UTR region of GRIN2B and BD with psychotic symptoms [13] and number of hospitalization due to mania [14]. Recently, a positive association between GRIN2B gene and BD was also reported in Han Chinese patients with BD [12].

Understanding the impact of specific glutamatergic pathways on brain substrates in BD are important for several reasons. First, it can determine particular brain regions associated with and affected by the glutamatergic genetic signals. Second, multiplatform approaches such as genetic-imaging paradigms can clarify and highlight pathophysiological mechanisms underlying BD [15]. Third, this can subsequently foster targeted multimodality investigations involving structural, functional, and chemical neuroimaging tools. Fourth, there is also suggestion that glutamatergic genes including GRIN2B are involved in oligodendrocyte survival through common stress related signaling pathways [16]. Furthermore, previous diffusion tensor imaging studies had implicated abnormalities in brain white matter regions including frontal, parietal brain regions and cingulum in BD [17].

In the context of scant extant studies examining the impact of glutamatergic genetic signals on brain structural abnormalities in BD, we aimed to investigate the relationship of GRIN2B gene and brain white matter (WM) changes in patients with BD using diffusion tensor imaging. Based on extant neuroimaging data, we hypothesized that GRIN2B risk allele is associated with brain cortical white matter abnormalities involving reductions of white matter integrity in the frontal, parietal and temporal, and occipital regions and cingulate gyrus in BD.

2. Method

2.1. Participants

All subjects gave written informed consent to participate in the study after a detailed explanation of the study procedures. Fourteen patients suffering from BD were recruited from the Institute of Mental Health, Singapore. All diagnoses were made by a psychiatrist (K.S.) using information obtained from the existing medical records, clinical history, mental status examination, interviews with the patients, and their significant spouses or relatives as well as the administration of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV disorders-Patient Version (SCID-I/P) [18]. Participants with a history of significant neurological illness such as seizure disorder, head trauma, and cerebrovascular accidents were excluded. Furthermore, no subject met DSM-IV criteria for alcohol or other substance abuse in the preceding 3 months. The patients were maintained on a stable dose of antipsychotic medication for at least two weeks prior to the recruitment and did not have their medication withdrawn for the purpose of the study. Another twenty two age- and gender-matched healthy controls (HC) were screened using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV disorders—Nonpatient Version (SCID-I/NP)—[19] and deemed not to suffer from any Axis 1 psychiatric disorder and had no history of any major neurological, medical illnesses, substance abuse or psychotropic medication use. They were recruited from the staff population at the hospital as well as from the community by advertisements. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Boards of the Institute of Mental Health, Singapore, as well as the National Neuroscience Institute, Singapore.

2.2. Genotyping Procedure

PCR was performed according to Ohtsuki et al. [20] with slight modifications. Isolated genomic DNA was amplified in 25 μL amplification mixture: 2 ng genomic DNA, 0.2 μM of each primer, 0.5 mM of dNTPs, 0.625 U GoTaq DNA polymerase (Promega, USA), 5 μL GoTaq PCR buffer, and sterile milliQ water. The cycling conditions were initial denaturation at 95 degree celsius for 2 min followed by 40 cycles with a profile of 95 degree celsius for 1 min, 59 degree celsius for 1 min, 72 degree celsius for 1 min, and a final extension at 72 degree celsius for 5 min. Amplicons (rs890G/T) were separated by electrophoresis on 1.7% agarose gel, excised, purified (Qiagen Gel Extraction Kit) and sequenced.

2.3. Brain Imaging Acquisition

Brain imaging was performed using a 3-Tesla whole body scanner (Philips Achieva, Philips Medical System, Eindhoven, The Netherlands) with a SENSE head coil at the National Neuroscience Institute, Singapore. High-resolution T1-weighted Magnetization Prepared Rapid Gradient Recalled Echo (MPRAGE) was required (TR = 7.2 s; TE = 3.3 ms; flip angle = 8°). Each T1-weighted volume consisted of 180 axial slices of 0.9 mm thickness with no gap (field of view, 230 mm × 230 mm; acquisition matrix, 256 × 256 pixels). For DTI, single-shot echo-planar diffusion tensor images were obtained (TR = 3725 ms; TE = 56 ms; flip angle = 90°,   = 800 s/mm²) with 15 different nonparallel directions (   = 800 sec/mm2) and the baseline image without diffusion weighting (   = 0 sec/mm2). The acquisition matrix was 112 × 109 pixels with a field of view of 230 mm × 230 mm, which was zero-filled to 256 × 256 pixels. A total of 42 axial slices of 3.0 mm thickness were acquired parallel to anterior-posterior commissure line. The T1-weighted and DTI data were sequentially acquired in a single session scan time without position change. Stability of a high signal to noise ratio was assured through a regular automated quality control procedure.

2.4. Image Processing

The structural MRI images were converted from the scanned images into the Analyze format, which were further processed using the Free Surfer software package (Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard University, http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/). The software reformats each brain volume image into a volume image with 1 mm3 isovoxels, from which relevant brain structures can be delineated [2126]. This automated method has been shown to be statistically indistinguishable from manual raters and reduces random errors, rater error, and intersubject variability typical of manual techniques [24]. Fractional Anisotropy (FA) maps were acquired from the DTI images from the software DTI Studio [27] and were then coregistered automatically to the MP-RAGE images using a mutual information cost function and a 12 parameter affine transformation. Eddy current correction was performed prior to registration. As the DTI images are co-registered to the subjects’ structural images, FA images were also automatically delineated for the separate brain structures using the same delineation parameters in the structural images and FA parameters of relevant brain structures were obtained.

The test-retest (intrarater) reliability of the measurement technique of the cortical FAs were assessed by repeated measurement of eight randomly selected subjects (4 from controls and 4 from patients) over a minimum interval of 2 weeks. On the basis of a two-factor random effects model for intraclass correlation coefficient calculation, alpha values were all greater than 0.90 for the all the cortical FA indices. Inter-rater reliability evaluation performed on a separate subset of eight subjects (4 from controls and 4 from patients) revealed alpha values of greater than 0.90 for the cortical FA indices.

2.5. Statistical Analyses

Demographic variables between BD and HC were compared using two sample student -test and chi-square test for continuous and categorical variables, respectively. For quality control, the samples were in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE ). The HWE -value was obtained using the Haploview v4.2 [28], and the rests of the statistical analyses were performed using PASW 18. The genotype effect, diagnosis effect, and genotype-diagnosis interactions were further analyzed using the two-way analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) to control for covariates such as age, gender, education, handedness, and intracranial volume. Post hoc tests were performed for white matter regions with significant genotype-diagnosis interactions within HC and BD patient groups. The significance level for statistical tests was set at at two tailed .

3. Results

3.1. Sociodemographic and Clinical Characteristics

In the whole sample, there was no significant difference between BD and HC groups in age and gender. Significant difference between the groups was only found in years of education, whereby the BD group had less years of education compared to the HC group. In the BD group, the mean age of onset of the illness was 32.3 (SD 13.5) years. Overall, the mean duration of illness in BD patients was 4.07 years (SD 5.62) and the duration of untreated illness was 0.25 years (SD 0.34) (Table 1).


CharacteristicsBD
( )
HC
( )
Test statisticP

Agea, years36.9 (12.2)32.7 (12.3) .331
Genderb
 Males
 Females
10 (71.4)
4 (28.6)
11 (50.0)
11 (50.0)
.204
Educationa, years11.4 (2.3)14.1 (2.3) <0.05
Age at onseta, years32.3 (13.5)
Duration of psychiatric illnessa, years4.07 (5.62)
Duration of untreated illnessa, years0.25 (0.34)
Medication
 Lithium
 Valproate
7
7

Mean (S.D.).
Mean (%).
BD: patients with bipolar disorder; HC: healthy controls.

3.2. The Effect of GRIN2B Gene on White Matter Integrity in Bipolar Disorder

Overall, the T allele frequency for the GRIN2B risk variant amongst patients in the present study was 85.7%. The genotype frequencies of the GRIN2B risk variant are shown in Table 2. There were significant effects of diagnosis by genotype effect interactions observed in the bilateral frontal region (left: , ; right: , ), left parietal region ( , ), bilateral occipital region (left: , ; right: , ), and left cingulate gyrus (left: , ). These interactions remained significant after controlling for covariates (left frontal region: adjusted , ; right frontal region: adjusted , ; left parietal lobe: adjusted , ; left occipital region: adjusted , ; right occipital region: adjusted , ; left cingulate gyrus: adjusted , ). (Table 3).


LocusSNPChromosome positionGenotype frequency (%)HWE P
BD ( )HC ( )
GGGTTTGGGTTT

GRIN2Brs890137153081 (7.1)2 (14.3)11 (78.6)3 (13.6)5 (22.7)14 (63.6)0.05

BD: patients with bipolar disorder; HC: healthy controls; HWE P: Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium P value.

HC ( )BD ( )ANOVA (unadjusted)ANCOVAa (adjusted)
GG
( )
T carriers
( )
GG
( )
T carriers
( )
Diagnosis
effect
Genotype
effect
Interactions
effect
Diagnosis
effect
Genotype
effect
Interactions
effect
MeanSDMeanSDMeanSDMeanSD

Left occipital lobe0.1500.0270.1370.0160.2070.1310.0126.99.01321.4<.00110.8.0027.06.01216.2<.0018.93.006
Right occipital lobe0.1470.0310.1490.0160.2540.1450.01624.9<.00126.4<.00128.1<.00125.4<.00120.7<.00124.8<.001
Left parietal lobe0.1770.0050.1740.0140.2480.1720.01813.7.00118.2<.00115.8<.00113.7.00114.2.00113.0.001
Right parietal lobe0.1770.0200.1740.1530.2180.1750.0213.78.0614.34.0453.41.0743.58.0682.53.1222.68.112
Left temporal lobe0.1640.0040.1630.0090.1630.1610.0080.09.7640.11.7430.01.9340.08.7830.13.7190.00.956
Right temporal lobe0.1570.0050.1600.0120.1560.1550.0090.17.6850.05.8320.09.7710.17.6860.02.8980.17.682
Left frontal lobe0.1730.0200.1770.0140.2490.1590.0169.96.00321.4<.00125.5<.0019.62.00419.0<.00122.4<.001
Right frontal lobe0.1740.0290.1710.0140.2490.1610.01710.9.00221.6<.00118.7<.00110.8.00320.9<.00117.4<.001
Left cingulate gyrus0.2170.0210.2170.0140.2800.2080.01210.9.00218.6<.00118.6<.00112.6.00124.2<.00120.9<.001
Right cingulate gyrus0.2000.0170.1960.0170.2500.1930.0175.06.0328.82.0066.47.0166.86.01413.6.0017.16.012

Adjusted for age, gender, education, handedness, and intracranial volume.
BD: patients with bipolar disorder; HC: healthy controls.

As the diagnosis-genotype interactions were found to be significant for bilateral frontal, bilateral occipital, left parietal regions and left cingulate gyrus, we analyzed the genotype effects on these brain regions within patient and control groups (Figure 1). There was no significant difference within the HC group; however, brain FA values were significantly lower in BD patients with risk T genotypes compared to those with G/G genotype (left frontal region: , ; right frontal region: , ; left parietal region: , ; left occipital region: , ; right occipital region: ; ; left cingulate gyrus: , ).

4. Discussion

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first DTI study investigating the interrelationship between the GRIN2B risk gene variant and brain white matter abnormalities in patients with BD. We found specific significant associations between GRIN2B rs890 risk allele and brain FA reductions involving bilateral frontal regions, left parietal region, bilateral occipital regions, and left cingulate gyrus within BD patients but not in healthy controls suggesting disorder specific genetic effect on brain white matter.

Our findings are consistent with those from previous neuroimaging studies which found widespread brain white matter abnormalities in BD involving the cortical regions such as frontal, parietal, and occipital regions, as well as altered association and projection fibers although not in the context of imaging-genetic examination [17, 2936]. A neurobiological model of affective disorders includes cortical and subcortical neural systems and can be divided into two neural networks [37]. The first is the ventral limbic network which comprises the amygdala, insula, orbitofrontal cortex, and the striatum and is responsible for identifying emotional valence of a stimulus and production of automatic affective states. The second is the dorsal cognitive network which includes the frontal cortices, anterior and posterior cingulate cortices, precuneus, and cuneus, which is involved in attention, executive and cognitive functioning [3741]. Earlier data suggest that BD is associated with decreased activity in the dorsal network and hyperactivity in the ventral limbic network [37, 41], which can manifest as impaired performance on cognitive tasks, attention, and working memory deficits, dysregulation of mood, and abnormal emotional processing [39, 40]. Our current findings indicate GRIN2B risk allele associated reductions of white mater integrity in brain cortical regions within the dorsal network. Furthermore, the cingulate region has been hypothesized to facilitate the communication between the dorsal and the ventral systems and contribute to the regulation and integration of mood, cognitive, somatic, and autonomic responses [37]. The cingulate cortex has connections with the ventral network anatomy such as the limbic structures and facilitates top-down process of voluntary suppression/inhibition of an immediate response towards external stimuli [35, 4245]. Disruption of white mater integrity in the cingulate gyrus may underlie increased biases towards negative and emotional stimuli or faces and diminished prefrontal modulation of affect exhibited in BD patients [37, 39].

Our study found an association between GRIN2B risk allele and lower FA in the parietal and occipital regions in BD. This is consistent with earlier DTI findings, although limited, of white matter abnormalities in the parietal and occipital regions in BD [34, 36, 46] as well as functional neuroimaging studies which have suggested abnormalities in similar parietal and occipital regions in BD [42, 43, 47]. Malhi et al. [42] performed a functional MRI (fMRI) study involving 10 euthymic BD patients and 10 matched healthy controls with the subjects engaged in a modified word-based memory task designed to implicitly invoke negative, positive or neutral affect. Compared to healthy subjects, BD patients exhibited reduced activations in the left inferior parietal lobule, right posterior cingulate gyrus, bilateral anterior cingulate gyrus, thalamus, and other cortical regions when presented with words with negative affect. Likewise, when presented with words with positive affect, BD patients showed decreased activations in the bilateral frontal gyri, right anterior cingulate gyrus, left posterior cingulate gyrus, and bilateral occipital regions compared to healthy subjects. The same research group found that poor performance during a Theory of Mind (ToM) task by euthymic BD patients was associated with less cortical activations and higher activations in the anterior cingulate gyrus and bilateral occipital regions [43]. Furthermore, a structural MRI study noted reduced gray matter density in the right parietal lobule which was associated with higher interference during the Stroop color word task in remitted patients with bipolar disorder I [47].

It was slightly surprising that no significant genotype-diagnosis interaction was noted in the temporal region despite the abundance of NR2B receptors in these regions. It is unclear how treatment with mood stabilisers such as valproate and lithium may have stabilized extant dysregulated glutamatergic neurotransmission in this region. For instance, chronic exposure to lithium was found to indirectly inhibit NMDA-receptor-mediated Ca2+ influx and decrease NR2B phosphorylation in temporal brain region [46]. Valproate induces neuroprotective proteins such as heat-shock protein (HSP70) by directly targeting histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibition in the cortical including temporal and striatal brain regions [48].

There are several limitations to the study. First, due to the small sample of subjects our findings need to be replicated with bigger sample size. Second, analyses of other brain structural measures including cortical thickness, subcortical structures, and specific white matter tracts will complement our understanding of the impact of GRIN2B on brain white matter integrity in BD. Third, we did not correlate the structural findings with neurocognitive data which would provide better insight into the cognitive impact of GRIN2B gene in BD.

In conclusion, we found that GRIN2B was associated with reductions of brain white matter integrity within the fronto-parietal-occipital cortical regions in patients with BD. Further elucidation of the interactions between different glutamate genes and their relationships with these structural, functional, and chemical brain substrates will enhance our understanding of dysregulated glutamatergic neurotransmission and its relation to neuroimaging endophenotypes in BD. This has the potential to shed light on neurobiological mechanisms that underlie BD and provide targets for future intervention.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the National Healthcare Group, Singapore (SIG/05004, SIG/05028), and the Singapore Bioimaging Consortium (RP C-009/2006) research grants awarded to Dr. Kang Sim. The authors would like to thank all participants, their families, and our hospital staff for their support of this study.

References

  1. S. Y. T. Cherlyn, P. S. Woon, J. J. Liu, W. Y. Ong, G. C. Tsai, and K. Sim, “Genetic association studies of glutamate, GABA and related genes in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder: a decade of advance,” Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 958–977, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. D. C. Goff and J. T. Coyle, “The emerging role of glutamate in the pathophysiology and treatment of schizophrenia,” The American Journal of Psychiatry, vol. 158, no. 9, pp. 1367–1377, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. S. M. Clinton and J. H. Meadow-Woodruff, “Abnormalities of the NMDA receptor and associated intracellular molecules in the thalamus in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder,” Neuropsychopharmacology, vol. 29, no. 7, pp. 1353–1362, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. R. Hashimoto, C. Hough, T. Nakazawa, T. Yamamoto, and D. Chuang, “Lithium protection against glutamate excitotoxicity in rat cerebral cortical neurons: involvement of NMDA receptor inhibition possibly by decreasing NR2B tyrosine phosphorylation,” Journal of Neurochemistry, vol. 80, no. 4, pp. 589–597, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. L. E. Hokin, J. F. Dixon, and G. V. Los, “A novel action of lithium: stimulation of glutamate release and inositol 1,4,5 trisphosphate accumulation via activation of the N-methyl D-aspartate receptor in monkey and mouse cerebral cortex slices,” Advances in Enzyme Regulation, vol. 36, pp. 229–244, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. S. Nonaka, C. J. Hough, and D. Chuang, “Chronic lithium treatment robustly protects neurons in the central nervous system against excitotoxicity by inhibiting N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor-mediated calcium influx,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 95, no. 5, pp. 2642–2647, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. D. J. Laurie, I. Bartke, R. Schoepfer, K. Naujoks, and P. H. Seeburg, “Regional, developmental and interspecies expression of the four NMDAR2 subunits, examined using monoclonal antibodies,” Molecular Brain Research, vol. 51, no. 1-2, pp. 23–32, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. A. M. Schito, A. Pizzuti, E. Di Maria et al., “mRNA distribution in adult human brain of GRIN2B, a N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor subunit,” Neuroscience Letters, vol. 239, no. 1, pp. 49–53, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. C. Lorenzi, D. Delmonte, A. Pirovano et al., “Searching susceptibility loci for bipolar disorder: a sib pair study on chromosome 12,” Neuropsychobiology, vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 10–18, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. M. D. Fallin, V. K. Lasseter, D. Avramopoulos et al., “Bipolar I disorder and schizophrenia: a 440-single-nucleotide polymorphism screen of 64 candidate genes among Ashkenazi Jewish case-parent trios,” The American Journal of Human Genetics, vol. 77, no. 6, pp. 918–936, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. D. Avramopoulos, V. K. Lasseter, M. D. Fallin et al., “Stage II follow-up on a linkage scan for bipolar disorder in the Ashkenazim provides suggestive evidence for chromosome 12p and the GRIN2B gene,” Genetics in Medicine, vol. 9, no. 11, pp. 745–751, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. Q. Zhao, R. Che, Z. Zhang et al., “Positive association between GRIN2B gene and bipolar disorder in the Chinese Han Population,” Psychiatry Research, vol. 185, no. 1-2, pp. 290–292, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. L. Martucci, A. H. C. Wong, V. de Luca et al., “N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor NR2B subunit gene GRIN2B in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder: polymorphisms and mRNA levels,” Schizophrenia Research, vol. 84, no. 2-3, pp. 214–221, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. S. Dalvie, N. Horn, C. Nossek, L. van der Merwe, D. Stein, and R. Ramesar, “Psychosis and relapse in bipolar disorder are related to GRM3, DAOA, and GRIN2B genotype,” African Journal of Psychiatry, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 297–301, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  15. Y. A. Kurnianingsih, C. N. Kuswanto, R. S. McIntyre, A. Qiu, B. C. Ho, and K. Sim, “Neurocognitive-genetic and neuroimaging-genetic research paradigms in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder,” Journal of Neural Transmission, vol. 118, no. 11, pp. 1621–1639, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. C. J. Carter, “eIF2B and oligodendrocyte survival: where nature and nurture meet in bipolar disorder and schizophrenia?” Schizophrenia Bulletin, vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 1343–1353, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. S. Heng, A. W. Song, and K. Sim, “White matter abnormalities in bipolar disorder: insights from diffusion tensor imaging studies,” Journal of Neural Transmission, vol. 117, no. 5, pp. 639–654, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. M. B. First, R. L. Spitzer, M. Gibbon, and J. B. W. Williams, Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders-Patient Version (SCID-P), American Psychiatric Press, Washington, DC, USA, 1994.
  19. M. B. First, R. L. Spitzer, M. Gibbon, and J. B. W. Williams, Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders-Non-Patient Version (SCID-NP), American Psychiatric Press, Washington, DC, USA, 2002.
  20. T. Ohtsuki, K. Sakurai, H. Dou, M. Toru, K. Yamakawa-Kobayashi, and T. Arinami, “Mutation analysis of the NMDAR2B (GRIN2B) gene in schizophrenia,” Molecular Psychiatry, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 211–216, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. A. M. Dale, B. Fischl, and M. I. Sereno, “Cortical surface-based analysis: I. Segmentation and surface reconstruction,” NeuroImage, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 179–194, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. B. Fischl, M. I. Sereno, and A. M. Dale, “Cortical surface-based analysis: II. Inflation, flattening, and a surface-based coordinate system,” NeuroImage, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 195–207, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. B. Fischl, M. I. Sereno, R. B. Tootell, and A. M. Dale, “High-resolution intersubject averaging and a coordinate system for the cortical surface,” Human Brain Mapping, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 272–284, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. B. Fischl, D. H. Salat, E. Busa et al., “Whole brain segmentation: automated labeling of neuroanatomical structures in the human brain,” Neuron, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 341–355, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. B. Fischl, D. H. Salat, A. J. W. van der Kouwe et al., “Sequence-independent segmentation of magnetic resonance images,” NeuroImage, vol. 23, supplement 1, pp. S69–S84, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. B. Fischl, A. van der Kouwe, C. Destrieux et al., “Automatically parcellating the human cerebral cortex,” Cerebral Cortex, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 11–22, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. H. Jiang, P. C. M. van Zijl, J. Kim, G. D. Pearlson, and S. Mori, “DtiStudio: resource program for diffusion tensor computation and fiber bundle tracking,” Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, vol. 81, no. 2, pp. 106–116, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. J. C. Barrett, B. Fry, J. Maller, and M. J. Daly, “Haploview: analysis and visualization of LD and haplotype maps,” Bioinformatics, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 263–265, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. C. M. Adler, J. Adams, M. P. DelBello et al., “Evidence of white matter pathology in bipolar disorder adolescents experiencing their first episode of mania: a diffusion tensor imaging study,” The American Journal of Psychiatry, vol. 163, no. 2, pp. 322–324, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. C. M. Adler, S. K. Holland, V. Schmithorst et al., “Abnormal frontal white matter tracts in bipolar disorder: a diffusion tensor imaging study,” Bipolar Disorders, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 197–203, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. S. Bruno, M. Cercignani, and M. A. Ron, “White matter abnormalities in bipolar disorder: a voxel-based diffusion tensor imaging study,” Bipolar Disorders, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 460–468, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. W. Y. Chan, G. L. Yang, M. Y. Chia et al., “Cortical and subcortical white matter abnormalities in adults with remitted first-episode mania revealed by tract-based spatial statistics,” Bipolar Disorders, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 383–389, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. F. Lin, S. Weng, B. Xie, G. Wu, and H. Lei, “Abnormal frontal cortex white matter connections in bipolar disorder: a DTI tractography study,” Journal of Affective Disorders, vol. 131, no. 1–3, pp. 299–306, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. W. T. Regenold, C. A. D'Agostino, N. Ramesh, M. Hasnain, S. Roys, and R. P. Gullapalli, “Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of white matter in bipolar disorder: a pilot study,” Bipolar Disorders, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 188–195, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. F. Vederine, M. Wessa, M. Leboyer, and J. Houenou, “A meta-analysis of whole-brain diffusion tensor imaging studies in bipolar disorder,” Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry, vol. 35, no. 8, pp. 1820–1826, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. A. Versace, J. R. C. Almeida, S. Hassel et al., “Elevated left and reduced right orbitomedial prefrontal fractional anisotropy in adults with bipolar disorder revealed by tract-based spatial statistics,” Archives of General Psychiatry, vol. 65, no. 9, pp. 1041–1052, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. H. S. Mayberg, “Limbic-cortical dysregulation: a proposed model of depression,” Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 471–481, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  38. M. L. Phillips, W. C. Drevets, S. L. Rauch, and R. Lane, “Neurobiology of emotion perception I: the neural basis of normal emotion perception,” Biological Psychiatry, vol. 54, no. 5, pp. 504–514, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. M. L. Phillips, W. C. Drevets, S. L. Rauch, and R. Lane, “Neurobiology of emotion perception II: implications for major psychiatric disorders,” Biological Psychiatry, vol. 54, no. 5, pp. 515–528, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. S. M. Strakowski, M. P. DelBello, and C. M. Adler, “The functional neuroanatomy of bipolar disorder: a review of neuroimaging findings,” Molecular Psychiatry, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 105–116, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. M. Wessa, J. Houenou, M. Leboyer et al., “Microstructural white matter changes in euthymic bipolar patients: a whole-brain diffusion tensor imaging study,” Bipolar Disorders, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 504–514, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. G. S. Malhi, J. Lagopoulos, A. M. Owen, B. Ivanovski, R. Shnier, and P. Sachdev, “Reduced activation to implicit affect induction in euthymic bipolar patients: an fMRI study,” Journal of Affective Disorders, vol. 97, no. 1–3, pp. 109–122, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. G. S. Malhi, J. Lagopoulos, P. Das, K. Moss, M. Berk, and C. M. Coulston, “A functional MRI study of theory of mind in euthymic bipolar disorder patients,” Bipolar Disorders, vol. 10, no. 8, pp. 943–956, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. M. N. Pavuluri, A. M. Passarotti, E. M. Harral, and J. A. Sweeney, “An fMRI study of the neural correlates of incidental versus directed emotion processing in pediatric bipolar disorder,” Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 308–319, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. F. Wang, J. H. Kalmar, Y. He et al., “Functional and structural connectivity between the perigenual anterior cingulate and amygdala in bipolar disorder,” Biological Psychiatry, vol. 66, no. 5, pp. 516–521, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. N. Barnea-Goraly, K. D. Chang, A. Karchemskiy, M. E. Howe, and A. L. Reiss, “Limbic and corpus callosum aberrations in adolescents with bipolar disorder: a tract-based spatial statistics analysis,” Biological Psychiatry, vol. 66, no. 3, pp. 238–244, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. M. Haldane, G. Cunningham, C. Androutsos, and S. Frangou, “Structural brain correlates of response inhibition in bipolar disorder I,” Journal of Psychopharmacology, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 138–143, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. D. Chuang, “The antiapoptotic actions of mood stabilizers: molecular mechanisms and therapeutic potentials,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 1053, pp. 195–204, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2013 Carissa Nadia Kuswanto et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

1144 Views | 460 Downloads | 4 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder