BioMed Research International

BioMed Research International / 2014 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2014 |Article ID 450814 |

Jia Su, Xiaojing Li, Qinglin Yu, Yahui Liu, Yaqing Wang, Haojun Song, Hanbin Cui, Weiping Du, Xiaohong Fei, Junsong Liu, Shaoyi Lin, Jian Wang, Wenyuan Zheng, Jinyan Zhong, Lulu Zhang, Maoqing Tong, Jin Xu, Xiaomin Chen, "Association of P2Y12 Gene Promoter DNA Methylation with the Risk of Clopidogrel Resistance in Coronary Artery Disease Patients", BioMed Research International, vol. 2014, Article ID 450814, 8 pages, 2014.

Association of P2Y12 Gene Promoter DNA Methylation with the Risk of Clopidogrel Resistance in Coronary Artery Disease Patients

Academic Editor: Shiwei Duan
Received04 Jan 2014
Revised10 Feb 2014
Accepted10 Feb 2014
Published18 Mar 2014


Background. Clopidogrel inhibits the ADP receptor P2Y12 to keep down the platelet aggregation. The goal of our study is to investigate the contribution of P2Y12 promoter DNA methylation to the risk of clopidogrel resistance (CR). Methods. The platelet functions were measured by the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay. Applying the bisulfite pyrosequencing technology, DNA methylation levels of two CpG dinucleotides on P2Y12 promoter were tested among 49 CR cases and 57 non-CR controls. We also investigated the association among P2Y12 DNA methylation, various biochemical characteristics, and CR. Result. Lower methylation of two CpGs indicated the poorer clopidogrel response (CpG1, ; CpG2, ) in alcohol abusing status. Meanwhile CpG1 methylation was inversely correlated with CR in smoking patients () and in subgroup of Albumin < 35 (). We observed that the level of DNA methylation might be affected by some clinical markers, such as TBIL, LEVF, Albumin, AST. The results also showed that the quantity of stent, fasting blood-glucose, and lower HbAC1 were the predictors of CR. Conclusions. The evidence from our study indicates that P2Y12 methylation may bring new hints to elaborate the pathogenesis of CR.

1. Introduction

ADP activates platelets through two G protein-coupled receptors: P2Y1 and P2Y12, and the activation of P2Y12 leads to sustained platelet aggregation [1]. Clopidogrel inhibits the purinergic ADP receptor P2Y12, keeps down the adenosine-diphosphate-induced platelet aggregation, and then prevents the cardiovascular risks in coronary atherosclerotic heart disease (CAD) patients who have been undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) [2]. However, the pharmacodynamic response to clopidogrel varies greatly [3], and patients with lesser degrees of platelet inhibition are more likely to suffer ischemic events [4, 5].

Clopidogrel resistance (CR) has been used to reflect the failure of clopidogrel to achieve its effect of antiplatelet aggregation. The underlying mechanism remains unclear. The extrinsic or intrinsic factors may contribute to the variability of platelet activity, including the role of genetic polymorphisms of transporters and enzymes participating in clopidogrel absorption and metabolic transformation and nongenetic causes, such as drug-drug interactions, comorbidities, and age [6]. Genetic factors, specifically the expression of the gene P2Y12, may play a great role in individual susceptibility to the clopidogrel [7].

DNA methylation is a reliable epigenetic marker and specifically occurs in the context of cytosine-phosphate-guanine (CpG) dinucleotide [8]. Vertebrate CpG islands (CGIs), which are briefly interspersed CpG-rich DNA sequences, are not predominantly methylated in or near the promoters of mammalian genes [9]. CGI hypermethylation is linked to transcriptional silencing of gene expression [10] and thus regulates the level of protein.

The evidence of the association between DNA methylation and the risk of clopidogrel resistance was scarce. Since multiple single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with poor activity to clopidogrel [11] did not appear to directly affect P2Y12 expression, the altered expression of P2Y12 was likely to be modulated by methylations of promoters or other epigenetic changes. Thus, we attempted to assess whether the DNA methylations of selected CpG islands in P2Y12 gene promoter were involved in clopidogrel resistance. Due to the little knowledge so far, this study may help to explore a novel aspect in understanding the mechanism of clopidogrel resistance.

2. Methods

2.1. Study Population

One hundred and six patients with CAD were collected from the Ningbo No. 1 Hospital. All of them were Han Chinese originated from Ningbo city in Eastern China. The inclusion criteria were as follows. (1) Patients for PCI: with drug-eluting stent, PCI was carried out according to current standard guidelines (ACC/AHA guidelines) through the radial route. (2) All the individuals were administrated with a loading dose of aspirin (300 mg) as well as clopidogrel (300 mg) before PCI. followed by 75 mg of clopidogrel and 100 mg of aspirin daily. (3) Patients of age ≥18 years and ≤80 years were included. The exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) the administration of concomitant glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor administration, (2) recent or chronic clopidogrel treatment, (3) sudden death, (4) history of bleeding diathesis, (5) haematocrit < 35% or >50%, and (6) total platelet count <150 000 μL or >500 000 μL.

Written informed consent was obtained from all the subjects. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Ningbo No. 1 Hospital and conformed with the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki.

2.2. Collection of Samples and Clinical Data

Blood samples were obtained overnight fast from the antecubital vein. The serologic markers, such as the concentrations of TG, LDL, ALT, AST, and uric acid in plasma, were measured by the IFCC reference measurement systems. All the tests applied the standard procedures recommended by the manufacturers and then the data were collected and entered into a central database.

2.3. Platelet Function Measurements

As there may be no significant changes of platelet reactivity from days 3 to 5 in AMI patients undergoing PCI [4], we measured the patients’ platelet reactivity at one week to one month after PCI. Blood samples were collected using the double-syringe technique and the first 2 to 4 mL free flowing blood was discarded to avoid spontaneous platelet activation. The platelet functions were measured by the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay (Accumetrics Inc., San Diego, CA).

The VerifyNow P2Y12 Assay is a whole blood, point-of-care system that has been developed to evaluate the responsiveness to P2Y12 antagonists [12]. Blood is drawn into a Greiner Bio-One 3.2% citrate Vacuette tube (Greiner Bio-One, Kremsmünster, Austria). The assay instrument contains fibrinogen-coated polystyrene beads, 20 nmol/L ADP, and 22 nmol/L PGE1. Surveyed by an optical signal, the result was expressed as P2Y12 reaction units (PRU). And a residual platelet reactivity (RPR) cutoff value ≥240 reaction units indicated the existence of clopidogrel resistance [13].

2.4. DNA Methylation Assay

Human genomic DNA was extracted from leucocytes of peripheral blood samples with a commercially available kit (QIAamp DNA Blood Mini Kit, Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). DNA concentrations were quantified by the ultramicronucleic acid ultraviolet tester (NANODROP 1000, Wilmington, USA), and all of them were more than 500 ng/L.

Bisulfite pyrosequencing technology was applied to determine the methylation levels of 2 CpG dinucleotides on the fragment of P2Y12 gene promoter, which combines with sodium bisulfite DNA conversion chemistry (EpiTech Bisulfite Kits; Qiagen), polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification (Pyromark PCR Kit; Qiagen), and sequencing by synthesis assay (Pyromark Gold Q24 Reagents; Qiagen) of the target sequence. We selected PyroMark Assay Design software for planning PCR primers. Sequences of the PCR and pyrosequencing primers were described in Table 1.

GroupDNA sequence


2.5. Statistical Analysis

All data for continuous variables were described as means ± standard deviation and skewed variables as the median with interquartile range (IQR). A series of statistical analyses were performed to investigate the association among P2Y12 DNA methylation, various biochemical characteristics, and clopidogrel resistance.

For analysis of the association between categorical variables, we used either Pearson’s chi-square or Fisher’s exact test when appropriate. -test or Wilcoxon rank sum test for unpaired samples was applied to compare any continuous variables. The multiple linear regression was implemented to determine the correlation between the promoter DNA methylation of P2Y12 gene and metabolic factors. The interaction of P2Y12 methylation and confounding variables was tested by logistic regression.

A two-tailed value less than 0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance. All the statistical analyses above were carried out by PASW Statistics 18.0 software (SPSS, Inc., Somers, NY, USA).

3. Results

From October 2012 to October 2013, a total of 106 CAD patients who met the inclusion criteria were recruited in the current association study. Among them, by the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay, the PRU of 49 patients was more than 240, and they are defined as having poor reactivity to clopidogrel or clopidogrel resistance. As shown in Table 2, the baseline characteristics of the cases and controls in our study were summarized. The clinical characteristics were matching except the Albumin. One with clopidogrel resistance was more likely to have lower Albumin (cases versus controls: versus , ).

Cases ( ) Controls ( ) value

Male gender, (%)35 (71.43)46 (80.70)0.262
Hypertension, (%)36 (73.47)36 (63.16)0.257
Diabetes mellitus, (%)10 (20.41)13 (22.81)0.765
Dyslipidemia, (%)20 (40.82)26 (45.61)0.619
Current smoking, (%)19 (38.78)21 (36.84)0.838
Alcohol abuse9 (18.37)10 (17.54)0.912
Age, y 0.120
BMI, kg/m2, 0.695
Number of stents per patient 0.116
Left ventricular ejection fraction, % 0.115
Total cholesterol, mg/dL 0.382
Triglycerides, mg/dL 0.907
HDL cholesterol, mg/dL 0.608
LDL cholesterol, mg/dL 0.459
GLU, mmol/L 0.284
HbA1c, % 0.972
ALT, umol/L 0.908
AST, umol/L 0.977
TBIL, umol/L 0.464
Albumin (A), g/L 0.026
BUN, mmol/L 0.618
CREA, mmol/L 0.807
UA, umol/L 0.241
hsCRP, mg/L 0.636
PLT, /L 0.248
MPV, fL 0.058
PCT, % 0.375
PDW, % 0.664
P2Y12 CpG1, (%) 0.420
P2Y12 CpG2, (%) 0.821

In this study, we selected a fragment (GRCh37.p13:151103600-151101600) containing 2 CpG dinucleotides. Through bisulfite pyrosequencing assay, we explored the association of P2Y12 gene promoter DNA methylation with clopidogrel resistance. Meanwhile, as shown in Figure 1 and Table 2, our results showed that P2Y12 CpG1 methylation levels were not significantly associated with clopidogrel resistance (cases versus controls (%): versus , ), so as P2Y12 CpG2 (cases versus controls (%): versus , ) too.

We performed a breakdown analysis by clinical characteristics to evaluate whether the methylation levels of P2Y12 gene promoter (including CpG1 and CpG2) were related to clopidogrel poor response. It became clear to us that a significant association existed in the subgroup of Albumin < 35, current smoking, and alcohol abuse in the present study (Tables 3 to 5). We discovered that if patients were tippling, lower CpG1 (Table 3, cases versus controls (%): versus , ) and CpG2 (Table 3, cases versus controls (%): versus , ) methylation levels both indicated the poorer clopidogrel response. Moreover, CpG1 methylation was inversely correlated with CR in smoking patients (Table 4, cases versus controls (%): versus , ). Similarly, lower levels of P2Y12 CpG1 methylation were notably interrelated with increased risk of CR in subgroup of Albumin < 35 (Table 5, cases versus controls (%): versus , ). For the above two effects, no significant interactions were identified in P2Y12 CpG2, and we did not find any other significant association in the rest of the subgroups.

Alcohol abuseNo alcohol abuse
Cases ( )
Mean ± s.e.
Controls ( )
Mean ± s.e.
valueCases ( )
Mean ± s.e.
Controls ( )
Mean ± s.e.

P2Y12 CpG1, (%) 0.009 0.897
P2Y12 CpG2, (%) 0.022 0.469

Current smokingNo current smoking
Cases ( )
Mean ± s.e.
Controls ( )
Mean ± s.e.
valueCases ( )
Mean ± s.e.
Controls ( )
Mean ± s.e.

P2Y12 CpG1, (%) 0.026 0.598
P2Y12 CpG2, (%) 0.112 0.384

Albumin < 35Albumin ≥ 35
Cases ( )
Mean ± s.e.
Controls ( )
Mean ± s.e.
valueCases ( )
Mean ± s.e.
Controls ( )
Mean ± s.e.

P2Y12 CpG1, (%) 0.002 0.963
P2Y12 CpG2, (%) 0.207 0.872

We applied the method of multiple linear regression to explore the effect on DNA methylation from clinical factors. And we observed that the level of DNA methylation might be affected by some clinical marks (Table 6), such as TBIL, LEVF, Albumin, and AST in P2Y12 CpG 1 with alcohol abuse (, = 0.001, square = 0.724); LEVF, Albumin, and AST in P2Y12 CpG 2 with alcohol abuse (, = 0.001, square = 0.667); LEVF and TBIL in P2Y12 CpG 1 with current smoking (, = 0.005, square = 0.251); and LEVF, CRP, BUN, and Triglycerides in P2Y12 CpG 1 with Albumin < 35 (, , square = 0.840).

Model square

P2Y12 CpG1 with alcohol abuse(Constant)33.069 0.012 9.302 0.001 0.724
TBIL−0.362 0.013
LEVF0.690 0.001
Albumin−0.755 0.019
AST0.017 0.050

P2Y12 CpG2 with alcohol abuse(Constant)21.666 0.020 10.033 0.001 0.667
LEVF0.619 0.000a
Albumin−0.668 0.010
AST0.017 0.014

P2Y12 CpG1 with current smoking(Constant)28.035 0.004 6.193 0.005 0.251
LEVF0.318 0.026
TBIL−0.314 0.049

P2Y12 CpG1 with Albumin <35(Constant)−19.001 0.109 14.345 0.000a0.840
LEVF0.643 0.000a
CRP0.129 0.001
BUN2.228 0.006
Triglycerides3.205 0.044

The P value is less than 0.001.

Considering the influence of confounding variables, we carried out logistic regression analysis with nongenetic and genetic factors. The result showed that the quantity of stent and fasting blood-glucose were associated with CR, while the HbAC1 was inversely correlated with it (, Table 7). However, if we applied the logistic regression analysis with these in the above subgroups, it was indicated that the above nongenetic and genetic factors were no longer correlated with the poorer clopidogrel response (, Tables 8, 9, and 10).

Variables valueExp ( )95% C.I.

P2Y12 CpG1−0.141 0.096 0.869 0.74–1.03
P2Y12 CpG20.169 0.142 1.184 0.95–1.49
Age0.047 0.163 1.048 0.98–1.12
Gender (male)−0.591 0.399 0.554 0.14–2.19
Hypertension0.569 0.324 1.767 0.57–5.47
DM−0.979 0.282 0.376 0.06–2.24
Dyslipidemia−0.538 0.395 0.584 0.17–2.02
Current smoking−0.378 0.573 0.685 0.18–2.55
Alcohol abuse1.010 0.214 2.746 0.56–13.51
BMI−0.073 0.514 0.930 0.75–1.16
Stent0.865 0.009 2.374 1.24–4.53
LEVF−0.035 0.368 0.965 0.89–1.04
TC0.093 0.847 1.097 0.43–2.82
Triglycerides0.081 0.770 1.084 0.63–1.86
HDL−1.283 0.308 0.277 0.02–3.27
LDL−0.408 0.481 0.665 0.21–2.07
GLU0.681 0.013 1.976 1.15–3.39
HbAC1−0.907 0.022 0.404 0.19–0.88
ALT−0.009 0.541 0.992 0.97–1.02
AST0.002 0.366 1.002 1.00–1.01
TBIL−0.036 0.357 0.965 0.89–1.04
A−0.091 0.264 0.913 0.78–1.07
BUN−0.161 0.292 0.851 0.63–1.15
CR−0.004 0.825 0.996 0.97–1.03
UA0.002 0.455 1.002 1.00–1.01
CRP−0.007 0.677 0.993 0.96–1.03
PLT0.008 0.712 1.008 0.97–1.05
MPV0.380 0.507 1.462 0.48–4.50
PCT−13.635 0.639 0.000 0.00–6.71
PDW−0.183 0.736 0.832 0.29–2.42
Constant8.480 0.469 4815.697

Variables valueExp ( )95% C.I.

P2Y12 CpG 1−0.3620.242 0.697 0.38–1.28
P2Y12 CpG 20.0870.841 1.091 0.47–2.55
Current smoking−0.5120.845 0.599 0.00–101.18
Albumin−0.0460.799 0.955 0.67–1.36
Stent−0.5490.567 0.578 0.09–3.77
GLU−0.2120.884 0.809 0.05–13.84
HbAC1−0.1340.943 0.875 0.02–34.27

Variables valueExp ( )95% C.I.

P2Y12 CpG 1−0.107 0.056 0.898 0.81–1.00
Alcohol abuse0.291 0.707 1.338 0.29–6.12
Albumin−0.088 0.241 0.916 0.79–1.06
Stent0.430 0.328 1.537 0.65–3.64
GLU0.577 0.150 1.781 0.81–3.91
HbAC1−0.847 0.128 0.429 0.14–1.28
Constant8.942 0.039 7648.274

Variables valueExp ( )95% C.I.

P2Y12 CpG 1−0.414 0.199 0.661 0.35–1.24
Current smoking−9.623 0.922 0.000 0.00–2.95
Alcohol abuse4.505 0.965 90.429 0.00–9.00
Stent0.803 0.711 2.233 0.03–157.51
GLU−2.065 0.340 0.127 0.00–8.79
HbAC11.789 0.573 5.986 0.01–3041.06
Albumin−1.016 0.307 0.362 0.05–2.55
Constant49.113 0.265

4. Discussion

Since various trails had been keen on the single-nucleotide polymorphisms, some had averted their sight to epigenetics, such as miRNA, DNA methylation. Recently, we have found that aberrant methylation is interpreted to take part in the occurrence and development of diseases including colorectal cancer [14, 15], breast cancer [16, 17], coronary artery disease [18], and schizophrenia [19]. For clopidogrel resistance, numerous studies have investigated the underlying mechanism. The single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) within P2Y12 gene have been extensively studied and some research has shown that the H2 haplotype (the P2Y12 T744C polymorphism) influences the platelet aggregation [11]. Though more studies have paid attention to the epigenetic mechanisms in cardiovascular disease, especially clopidogrel resistance, for example, miRNA [20], there is little research focusing on the relationship between DNA methylation and the risk of clopidogrel resistance.

In this study, the relationship between P2Y12 gene promoter DNA methylation and the risk of clopidogrel resistance in CAD patients was investigated. As far as we know, it was the first study on the topic of DNA methylation and clopidogrel resistance. Unfortunately, no correlation in selected CpG islands was detected. However, we found that a significant association existed in the subgroup of Albumin <35, current smoking, and alcohol abuse. The lower the methylation levels of CpG1 in the above subgroup, the higher the platelet activity after standardized antiplatelet treatment, similar to the methylation levels of CpG2 in alcohol abuse group too.

Although no public evidence had shown the value of Albumin and alcohol abuse would influence the clopidogrel responding, a new meta-analysis reported that the clinical benefit of clopidogrel treatment in reducing cardiovascular events (including death, myocardial infarction, and stroke) was discovered primarily in smokers, with little benefit in nonsmokers [21]. Thus, we need to give careful consideration to these factors. However, not every study demonstrated the significant association, especially the smoking status receiving clopidogrel. The basic research of their in-depth mechanism, which did not have a definite conclusion, should continue in order to give us ongoing insights.

Additionally, we have to observe the influence of confounding variables on methylation. In our study, some clinical factors (e.g., TBIL, LEVF, Albumin, AST CRP, BUN, and Triglycerides) may influence the level of methylation in a particular population, though the square in model of P2Y12 CpG 1 with current smoking was lower which indicates a lack of reliability. It was similar to other research that the concentration of AST was inversely correlated with ADD1 CpG2-5 methylation levels in female nonessential hypertension [22], and the level of methylation in gene-specific DNA is associated with serum levels of C-reactive protein [23] as well as the levels of Triglycerides and fatty acids in abdominal adipose tissue [24]. However, of all research above including our study, the sample was limited. Additional and larger studies would enhance reliability.

Furthermore, we should focus on the gene-environment interaction. Increasing evidence manifested that environmental and lifestyle factors could influence epigenetic mechanisms, though few were involved in cardiology. For instance, one recent study, which evaluated global DNA methylation from buccal cells of children exposed to smoking, demonstrated hypomethylation of LINE-1 repetitive elements [25]. Another one pointed out that the acute exposure to ethanol induced high methylation level of specific cell cycle genes in monolayer cultures of neural stem cells [26]. In our study, beside the relationship between P2Y12 gene methylation and the risk of clopidogrel resistance, we could not ignore the gene-environment interaction. Due to such a high interference factor, we wish to apply the multifactor dimensionality reduction (MDR), stratified analysis, and crossover analysis to identify and characterize the effect among the P2Y12 methylation and the nongenetic factors [27]. However, it is too difficult to stratify the level of methylation in accepted standards.

Meanwhile, a large quantity of research indicates that some other extrinsic factors, comorbidities, for instance, might also contribute to clopidogrel resistance. We used the logistic regression analysis with confounding factors. In the total population, the quantity of stent, fasting blood-glucose, and lower HbAC1 were the predictors of CR. However, if we applied the logistic regression analysis in subgroups (Albumin < 35, current smoking, and alcohol abuse), all of them, including genetic and nongenetic causes, association were not found. Comorbidities, such as diabetes mellitus (including the type of diabetes [28] and glycemic control [29]), chronic renal diseases [30] or different renal function grades [31], obesity [31] or elevated body mass index (BMI), heart failure [13], and inflammatory state [32], might be the predictor of poor clopidogrel response. Some of the evidence above was similar to ours. Nevertheless, we observed that lower HbAC1 was the predictor of CR. It was opposite to recent studies of evidence-based medicine [33, 34]. This may be due to the limited samples and the lack of more consistent stratification. Additionally, a larger sample set of the population and more meticulous stratification standards would help us obtain a comprehensive understanding. Furthermore, as coexisting polymorphisms in different genes might lead to persistent platelet activation while on clopidogrel [35], sophisticated gene-gene interaction of DNA methylation, such as the DNA methylation in ABCB1 or CYP2C19 with P2Y12, also needs to be considered carefully. If future research is possible, the observations will likely bring new information to elaborate the pathogenesis of clopidogrel resistance.

Although considerable efforts have been made, there are some limitations inherent in our study. Firstly, the sample size is relatively small. Future investigation with larger samples can be arranged for further assessment. Secondly, for the whole promoter of P2Y12 gene, we only selected one fragment of the CGI, but there might be other fragments related to clopidogrel resistance. Thirdly, P2Y12 gene methylation was measured in DNA from the leucocyte in peripheral blood which contained granulocytes, lymphocytes, and so on. Fourthly, a possibility of unknown confounding factors might exist and affect the expression of P2Y12 gene methylation. The exact interactions among them remain to be explored in future studies.

In summary, our study indicates that lower P2Y12 gene promoter DNA methylation increases the risk of clopidogrel resistance in the patients with Albumin ≤ 35, current smoking, or alcohol abuse. Meanwhile some extrinsic factors might be correlated with DNA methylation, and the quantity of stent, fasting blood-glucose, and lower HbAC1 might be the predictors of clopidogrel resistance. Thus, we would aim for additional, larger studies and a more advanced empirical approach along with standardized stratification to validate our findings in further cases.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Authors’ Contribution

Jia Su, Hanbin Cui, Jin Xu, and Xiaomin Chen contributed to the conception of the study; Jia Su, Xiaojing Li, Weiping Du, Xiaohong Fei, Junsong Liu, Shaoyi Lin, Jian Wang, Wenyuan Zheng, Jinyan Zhong, and Lulu Zhang helped with sample and data collection; Jia Su, Xiaojing Li, Yahui Liu, Yaqing Wang, and Maoqing Tong performed the platelet function measurement and bisulfite pyrosequencing; Jia Su, Qinglin Yu, and Haojun Song carried out the analysis of the data and interpretation of the data. All the authors contributed to the writing, discussion, and approval of the paper.


  1. S. P. Kunapuli, R. T. Dorsam, S. Kim, and T. M. Quinton, “Platelet purinergic receptors,” Current Opinion in Pharmacology, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 175–180, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. R. S. Wright, J. L. Anderson, C. D. Adams et al., “2011 ACCF/AHA focused update of the Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Unstable Angina/Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (updating the 2007 guideline): a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines developed in collaboration with the American College of Emergency Physicians, Society for Cardiovascular,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 57, no. 19, pp. 1920–1959, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  3. P. A. Gurbel, K. P. Bliden, B. L. Hiatt, and C. M. O'Connor, “Clopidogrel for coronary stenting: response variability, drug resistance, and the effect of pretreatment platelet reactivity,” Circulation, vol. 107, no. 23, pp. 2908–2913, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. S. Matetzky, B. Shenkman, V. Guetta et al., “Clopidogrel resistance is associated with increased risk of recurrent atherothrombotic events in patients with acute myocardial infarction,” Circulation, vol. 109, no. 25, pp. 3171–3175, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  5. W. Hochholzer, D. Trenk, H.-P. Bestehorn et al., “Impact of the degree of peri-interventional platelet inhibition after loading with clopidogrel on early clinical outcome of elective coronary stent placement,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 48, no. 9, pp. 1742–1750, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. M. Karaźniewicz-Łada, D. Danielak, and F. Główka, “Genetic and non-genetic factors affecting the response to clopidogrel therapy,” Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 663–683, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. G. Campo, L. Fileti, M. Valgimigli et al., “Poor response to clopidogrel: current and future options for its management,” Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 319–331, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. A. Razin, C. Webb, M. Szyf et al., “Variations in DNA methylation during mouse cell differentiation in vivo and in vitro,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 81, no. 8, pp. 2275–2279, 1984. View at: Google Scholar
  9. M. Fatemi, M. M. Pao, S. Jeong et al., “Footprinting of mammalian promoters: use of a CpG DNA methyltransferase revealing nucleosome positions at a single molecule level,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 33, no. 20, pp. e176.1–e176.9, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. S. Morita, R. U. Takahashi, R. Yamashita et al., “Genome-wide analysis of DNA methylation and expression of microRNAs in breast cancer cells,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 13, no. 7, pp. 8259–8272, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. T. Cuisset, C. Frere, J. Quilici et al., “Role of the T744C polymorphism of the P2Y12 gene on platelet response to a 600-mg loading dose of clopidogrel in 597 patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome,” Thrombosis Research, vol. 120, no. 6, pp. 893–899, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. I.-S. Kim, Y.-H. Jeong, M.-K. Kang et al., “Correlation of high post-treatment platelet reactivity assessed by light transmittance aggregometry and the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay,” Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 486–495, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  13. R. Marcucci, A. M. Gori, R. Paniccia et al., “Cardiovascular death and nonfatal myocardial infarction in acute coronary syndrome patients receiving coronary stenting are predicted by residual platelet reactivity to ADP detected by a point-of-care assay a 12-month follow-up,” Circulation, vol. 119, no. 2, pp. 237–242, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. R. Grützmann, B. Molnar, C. Pilarsky et al., “Sensitive detection of colorectal cancer in peripheral blood by septin 9 DNA methylation assay,” PLoS ONE, vol. 3, no. 11, Article ID e3759, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. T. DeVos, R. Tetzner, F. Model et al., “Circulating methylated SEPT9 DNA in plasma is a biomarker for colorectal cancer,” Clinical Chemistry, vol. 55, no. 7, pp. 1337–1346, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. H. M. Müller, H. Fiegl, A. Widschwendter, and M. Widschwendter, “Prognostic DNA methylation marker in serum of cancer patients,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 1022, pp. 44–49, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. H. M. Müller, A. Widschwendter, H. Fiegl et al., “DNA methylation in serum of breast cancer patients: an independent prognostic marker,” Cancer Research, vol. 63, no. 22, pp. 7641–7645, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  18. S.-P. Guay, D. Brisson, J. Munger, B. Lamarche, D. Gaudet, and L. Bouchard, “ABCA1 gene promoter DNA methylation is associated with HDL particle profile and coronary artery disease in familial hypercholesterolemia,” Epigenetics, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 464–472, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  19. H. Xu, B. Wang, D. Su et al., “The DNA methylation profile of PLA2G4C gene promoter in schizophrenia,” Psychiatry Research, vol. 200, no. 2-3, pp. 1079–1081, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. R. Shi, L. Ge, X. Zhou et al. et al., “Decreased platelet miR-223 expression is associated with high on-clopidogrel platelet reactivity,” Thrombosis Research, vol. 131, no. 6, pp. 508–513, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. J. J. Gagne, K. Bykov, N. K. Choudhry, T. J. Toomey, J. G. Connolly, and J. Avorn, “Effect of smoking on comparative efficacy of antiplatelet agents: systematic review, meta-analysis, and indirect comparison,” British Medical Journal, vol. 347, Article ID f5307, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  22. L. N. Zhang, P. P. Liu, L. Wang et al., “Lower ADD1 gene promoter DNA methylation increases the risk of essential hypertension,” PloS ONE, vol. 8, no. 5, Article ID e63455, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  23. Y. V. Sun, A. Lazarus, J. A. Smith et al., “Gene-specific DNA methylation association with serum levels of C-reactive protein in African Americans,” PloS ONE, vol. 8, no. 8, Article ID e73480, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  24. S. Gehrke, B. Brueckner, A. Schepky et al., “Epigenetic regulation of depot-specific gene expression in adipose tissue,” PloS ONE, vol. 8, no. 12, Article ID e82516, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  25. C. V. Breton, H.-M. Byun, M. Wenten, F. Pan, A. Yang, and F. D. Gilliland, “Prenatal tobacco smoke exposure affects global and gene-specific DNA methylation,” American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, vol. 180, no. 5, pp. 462–467, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. S. D. Hicks, F. A. Middleton, and M. W. Miller, “Ethanol-induced methylation of cell cycle genes in neural stem cells,” Journal of Neurochemistry, vol. 114, no. 6, pp. 1767–1780, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. A. A. Motsinger and M. D. Ritchie, “The effect of reduction in cross-validation intervals on the performance of multifactor dimensionality reduction,” Genetic Epidemiology, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 546–555, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. B. Gaborit, C. FrèRe, T. Cuisset, M.-C. Alessi, and A. Dutour, “Enhanced post-clopidogrel platelet reactivity in diabetic patients is independently related to plasma fibrinogen level but not to glycemic control,” Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis, vol. 7, no. 11, pp. 1939–1941, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. W. Kuliczkowski, M. Gasior, D. Pres et al., “Effect of glycemic control on response to antiplatelet therapy in patients with diabetes mellitus and ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction,” American Journal of Cardiology, vol. 110, no. 3, pp. 331–336, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. S. H. Park, W. Kim, C. S. Park, W. Y. Kang, S. H. Hwang, and W. Kim, “A comparison of clopidogrel responsiveness in patients with versus without chronic renal failure,” American Journal of Cardiology, vol. 104, no. 9, pp. 1292–1295, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. C. Muller, S. Caillard, L. Jesel et al., “Association of estimated GFR with platelet inhibition in patients treated with clopidogrel,” American Journal of Kidney Diseases, vol. 59, no. 6, pp. 777–785, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. D.-W. Park, S.-W. Lee, S.-C. Yun et al., “A point-of-care platelet function assay and C-reactive protein for prediction of major cardiovascular events after drug-eluting stent implantation,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 58, no. 25, pp. 2630–2639, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. T. Geisler, K. Mueller, S. Aichele et al., “Impact of inflammatory state and metabolic control on responsiveness to dual antiplatelet therapy in type 2 diabetics after PCI: prognostic relevance of residual platelet aggregability in diabetics undergoing coronary interventions,” Clinical Research in Cardiology, vol. 99, no. 11, pp. 743–752, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. O. Morel, S. El Ghannudi, S. Hess et al., “The extent of P2Y12 inhibition by clopidogrel in diabetes mellitus patients with acute coronary syndrome is not related to glycaemic control: roles of white blood cell count and body weight,” Thrombosis and Haemostasis, vol. 108, no. 2, pp. 338–348, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. L. A. Malek, B. Kisiel, M. Spiewak et al., “Coexisting polymorphisms of P2Y12 and CYP2C19 genes as a risk factor for persistent platelet activation with clopidogrel,” Circulation Journal, vol. 72, no. 7, pp. 1165–1169, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2014 Jia Su et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.
 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2021, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.