BioMed Research International

BioMed Research International / 2014 / Article
Special Issue

Familial Parkinson’s Disease/Parkinsonism

View this Special Issue

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2014 |Article ID 718732 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/718732

Anelya Kh. Alieva, Maria I. Shadrina, Elena V. Filatova, Aleksey V. Karabanov, Sergey N. Illarioshkin, Svetlana A. Limborska, Petr A. Slominsky, "Involvement of Endocytosis and Alternative Splicing in the Formation of the Pathological Process in the Early Stages of Parkinson’s Disease", BioMed Research International, vol. 2014, Article ID 718732, 6 pages, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/718732

Involvement of Endocytosis and Alternative Splicing in the Formation of the Pathological Process in the Early Stages of Parkinson’s Disease

Academic Editor: Eng-King Tan
Received04 Feb 2014
Revised05 Mar 2014
Accepted13 Mar 2014
Published03 Apr 2014

Abstract

Parkinson’s disease (PD) is the one of most widespread neurodegenerative pathologies. Because of the impossibility of studying the endogenous processes that occur in the brain of patients with PD in the presymptomatic stage, the mechanisms that trigger the disease remain unknown. Thus, the identification of the processes that play an important role in the early stages of the disease in these patients is extremely difficult. In this context, we performed a whole-transcriptome analysis of the peripheral blood of untreated patients with stage 1 PD (Hoehn-Yahr scale). We demonstrated a significant change in the levels of transcripts included in the large groups of processes associated with the functioning of the immune system and cellular transport. Moreover, a significant change in the splicing of genes involved in cellular-transport processes was shown in our study.

1. Introduction

Parkinson’s disease (PD) is one of the most widespread neurodegenerative pathologies [1]. A key component of the pathogenesis of PD is the death of nigrostriatal neurons in the midbrain of patients [2], which in turn leads to a decrease in the concentration of dopamine (DA) and a disturbance in signal transmission between brain parts [3].

Genetic mutations that lead to the development of monogenic forms of PD, such as those located in the SNCA, LRRK2, PARK2, PINK1, PARK7, and ATP13A2 genes, have been identified. A large number of candidate genes that may also contribute to the development of the pathogenesis of PD have been described [4, 5]. Investigations of the functions of these genes have shown that the disturbance of cell processes related to mitochondrial dysfunction, oxidative stress, proteolysis, and immune response may play an important role in the pathogenesis of PD. Despite the many years dedicated to identifying the molecular-genetic factors that underlie the development of the PD pathogenesis, the full picture of the etiopathogenesis of PD has not been elucidated. Accordingly, the mutations that are known currently as being causative of monogenic forms of PD are only responsible for about 5–10% of all cases of familial PD [6]. Therefore, it is necessary to continue searching for new genes that are associated with the development of the pathological process in PD. One of the potential approaches that can be used to address this problem is the study of transcriptome changes in PD. To date, a large number of studies of the transcriptome profile of the brains of patients with PD have been performed. However, the patients who were analyzed in those reports were in the final and most severe stages of the disorder and underwent active medical treatments [710]; therefore, the data on gene-expression changes obtained in those studies do not represent the processes of initiation of the development of the disorder.

Because of the impossibility of studying the endogenous processes that occur in the brain of patients with PD in the presymptomatic stage, the mechanisms that trigger the disease remain unknown. To date, several studies of transcriptome changes in the peripheral blood of patients with PD have been reported [1113]. Although the results of those studies are of great interest, the patients analyzed by those authors were in the progressive stages of PD and were under active drug treatment. In this context, we performed a whole-transcriptome analysis of the peripheral blood of untreated patients with stage 1 PD (Hoehn-Yahr scale).

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Patients

All patients (Slavs residing in the European part of Russia) were diagnosed with PD at the Research Center of Neurology, Russian Academy of Medical Sciences. All patients with PD were selected and studied according to the International Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) and Hoehn-Yahr scores [14, 15]. The diagnosis of PD was based on the UK PD Brain Bank Criteria [16]. In this work, four untreated patients with stage 1 PD were studied. The mean age SD at the disease onset was 55.0 ± 5.0 years (range: 50–60 years), and the mean age at enrollment was 55.0 ± 5.0 years (range: 50–60 years). Four neurologically normal age-matched individuals from the same population were studied as controls.

All participants were examined using the MLPA procedure [17, 18], which revealed an absence of mutations. All blood samples were collected with the informed consent of the investigated persons. The study was approved by The Ethics Committee of the Research Centre of Neurology, RAMS.

2.2. RNA Preparation

All blood samples were collected at 8:00 a.m. while fasting and then stored for less than 2 h at +4°C before isolation of RNA. The isolation of total RNA from whole blood was performed using the ZR Whole-Blood Total RNA Kit (Zymo Research Corp., Irvine, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s recommendations. RNA concentration was determined using the fluorometric Qubit 1.0 by Quant-iT RNA BR Assay Kit (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, California, USA).

2.3. Whole-Transcriptome Analysis

The analysis of large-scale transcriptome changes was carried out both in individual pairs (PD patient/healthy control) and in RNA pools (pool of the RNAs from all patients with PD/pool of the RNAs of healthy controls). Two hundred nanograms of total RNA derived from each sample of the peripheral blood of patients or controls was included in each corresponding pool. Hybridization was performed using the HumanHT-12 v4 Expression BeadChip Kit (Illumina, San Diego, California, USA). Ten independent hybridizations were carried out, and the expression levels of all genes were determined for each “sample/control” pair and for pool pairs.

The data obtained were compared among pairs and pools. Averaged data regarding transcript levels in pools and pairs were compared with the averaged data in the other pairs and pools using the Genome Studio software (Illumina, San Diego, California, USA). Our data are available as gene expression omnibus (GEO) datasets (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE54536) [19, 20].

2.4. Statistical Analysis

A volcano plot was used to identify differentially expressed genes (using -fold 1.5 and value as the threshold of statistical significance). For further investigations, we selected transcripts that were common among all the pairs and pools. The software package Genome Studio (Illumina, San Diego, California, USA) and the DAVID Bioinformatics Resources 6.7 database (http://david.abcc.ncifcrf.gov/home.jsp) were used for the statistical processing of the data regarding the gene-expression levels obtained from microchips [21, 22].

2.5. Analysis of Obtained Data

We carried out a transcriptome analysis in samples of the peripheral blood of four untreated patients with stage 1 PD, according to the Hoehn-Yahr scale [15], and four healthy volunteers using the HumanHT-12 v4 Expression BeadChip Kit. The relative levels of 47,000 transcripts were evaluated using this chip. In a first stage, five pairs of total RNA samples were used for whole-transcriptome analysis: four pairs that each consisted of the RNA from a patient with PD and the RNA from a healthy volunteer with matching age and sex and one pool pair that consisted of a pool of the total RNA from all patients investigated and a pool of the total RNA from the healthy controls. First, differentially represented transcripts (DRT), that is, those with levels that were altered by more than 1.5 times value , were selected for each pair. Subsequently, the pairs were compared with each other, and the DRTs that were common to all five pairs were taken into consideration for further analysis (Table 1). In total, 1429 DRTs were selected as a result of the analysis performed using the Genome Studio software (Illumina, San Diego, California, USA) (-fold 1.5 and value ). The removal of individual differences between pairs yielded the most probable and significant results.


PairAmount of DRTs
( -fold > 1.5 and value < 0.01)
Amount of common DRTs

126761429
22458
32774
42667
Pool1993

A cluster analysis of these DRTs was performed using the DAVID Bioinformatics Resources 6.7 database [21, 22]. DAVID was used for further analysis of a panel of differentially expressing genes, which allowed us to perform a fast annotation of genes of interest and to combine them into functional groups. Two hundred eighty-eight transcripts for which there were no descriptions in the available databases were excluded from further analysis. Processes showing statistical significance, as evaluated based on the indicators of an enrichment score 1.0, value   0.01, and FDR 0.05, were selected from the total amount of data during the cluster analysis.

It is worth mentioning that the calculation of the false-discovery rate (FDR) or the correction of values using the Benjamini-Hochberg method is applied in situations where it is necessary to make a common decision on any matter in the presence of information regarding many parameters [23]. Currently, there is no established system of the application of this correction, and results with an FDR 0.1 were taken into consideration in some studies [24] whereas an FDR 0.05 was used in other studies [25]. In our work, we adhered to the more stringent version of this correction and took into account values with an FDR 0.05.

3. Results and Discussion

The results of the functional clustering of differentially expressed genes are presented in Table 2. Table 2 shows summarized data after clustering by DAVID. Data on the expression changes of the individual genes are available as GEO datasets (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE54536).


ClusterGene ontology terms and annotationsCount*Enrichment score** valueFDR***

Processes related to functioning of immune system
Immune system processGO:00023761006.21
Defense responseGO:0006952 683.72
Response to cytokine stimulusGO:0034097172.92
Positive regulation of I-kappaB kinase/NF-kappaB signalingGO:0043123192.82

Processes related to cellular transport
EndosomeGO:0005768414.12
Vesicle-mediated transportGO:0016192633.52
Protein kinase cascade (intracellular signal transduction)GO:0035556483.04
Membrane-enclosed lumenGO:00319741412.3
Intracellular transportGO:0046907661.55
Endoplasmic reticulum lumenGO:0005788141.50

Other processes
Alternative splicingGO:00083805149.31
LysosomeGO:0005764212.64
Regulation of catalytic activityGO:0050790772.23
Regulation of molecular functionGO:0065009852.23
Regulation of catalytic activityGO:0050790771.49

Count is number of genes in a cluster.
**Enrichment score ranks the biological significance of gene groups based on overall EASE scores of all enriched annotation terms.
***False-discovery rate (FDR) or the correction of values using the Benjamini-Hochberg method.

The data presented in Table 2 revealed that two clusters of metabolic processes associated with the functioning of the immune system and the processes of cellular transport and a cluster of genes actively undergoing alternative splicing were identified as a result of a bioinformatics analysis of DRTs. The high statistical significance of the clusters detected suggests that the biological processes included in these clusters may play an important role in the initiation of the pathological process in the early stages of PD.

At present, it is known that chronic inflammation is a characteristic of many neurodegenerative diseases [26] including PD. Moreover, the activation of microglia in the midbrain is positively correlated with the manifestation of the motor symptoms of PD [27, 28]. Experiments performed in vitro showed that misfolded synuclein activates microglia, which in turn leads to the secretion of cytokines, such as TNF- [29] and IL-1 [30], and to the production of ROS, which damage DA neurons [31]. After several GWASs and meta-analyses of the data obtained in these studies, the association between loci located within the gene clusters of histocompatibility (HLA-DRA and HLA-DRB) and PD was demonstrated [32, 33]. We identified four processes related to the immune system in our work, with a high degree of significance ( value and ): immune system process, defense response, response to cytokine stimulus, and positive regulation of IB kinase/NF-B signaling. The statistical significance of the results of the functional-validation analysis suggests that the processes associated with the functioning of the immune system may play an important role in the development of PD. Furthermore, a change in the expression pattern of genes associated with histocompatibility gene clusters, such as HLA-A, HLA-C, HLA-DRB4, HLA-DRB1, HLA-DRB6, HLA-DQA1, and HLA-DQB1, also indicates a similar role for these genes. Concomitantly, the HLA-DRB4, HLA-DRB1, and HLA-DRB6 genes are located in the genomic region that was shown to be associated with PD in GWASs [32, 33].

Another group of processes that yielded results with a high degree of significance includes those related to transport (Table 2). Data accumulated in numerous studies suggest that abnormalities related to the functioning of vesicular transport play an important role in neurodegeneration. Thus, disturbance of vesicular transport and, consequently, synaptic transmission is a common feature of diseases such as PD, Alzheimer’s disease, and several other disorders, although abnormalities at the synapse either precede or accompany the onset of symptoms [3438]. The processes associated with the functioning of the endosome ( value and ) and vesicular transport ( value , ) exhibited the highest reliability in this group. These data also indicate that abnormalities of vesicular transport may be involved in PD.

The third cluster that drew our attention was a cluster of genes with alternative splicing, which exhibited the highest statistical significance ( value and ). This cluster included mainly genes actively undergoing alternative splicing. Currently, it is known that alternative splicing may affect processes that are directly related to the functioning of the nervous system, such as synapse formation [39] and migration of nerve cells [40]. According to some studies that were performed using the brains of humans and chimpanzees, the intensity of the alternative splicing varies according to age [41]. In addition, relationships between changes in the intensity of alternative splicing and neurodegenerative diseases, such as Alzheimer’s disease [42] and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis [43], were demonstrated.

Therefore, we decided to examine in greater detail the genes included in the cluster of alternative splicing; reclustering of this group of genes was performed using DAVID. The results listed in Table 3 revealed that alternative splicing occurred mainly in genes that are involved in the functioning of the cellular transport.


ClustersPathwaysEnrichment scoreCount valueFDR

Membrane-bounded organelleGO:0043227 4.08260
EndosomeGO:00057682.2820
Microtubule cytoskeletonGO:00444222.2731

As can be seen from Table 3, genes, involved in the functioning of cellular transport, are mainly alternatively spliced.

It should be noted that, for the majority of the genes, a decrease in the level of their respective mRNAs compared with the control was observed. Concomitantly, the chip allows us to analyze only the level of the basic transcripts of most of the genes. Thus, the decrease in mRNA levels observed in our work may be associated with the intensification of alternative splicing in the peripheral blood of patients, leading to a reduction of the primary transcript. This points indirectly at elevated levels of alternative transcripts and, consequently, at the accumulation of proteins with altered functions. For example, a 1.5-fold decrease in the level of the primary transcript of the SNCA gene compared with the control was found here. These data may indicate an intensification of the alternative splicing of SNCA, which may lead to the accumulation of alternative transcripts and an increased synthesis of protein entities with a modified structure. It is known that an increased proportion of alternatively spliced transcripts lacking either exon 4, exon 6, or both leads to the formation of unstable heterotetramers that dissociate easily, thus resulting in the accumulation of toxic oligomers [44].

Moreover, genes that are directly involved in vesicle-mediated transport, such as dynamin 2 (DNM2), adaptor-related protein complex 2 (AP2), syntaxin-2 (STX2), syntaxin-10 (STX10), VAMP-associated protein A (VAPA), vesicle-associated membrane protein 4 (VAMP4), and VAMP8, were also included in this cluster. The level of their respective transcripts in the peripheral blood of patients with PD was reduced, on average, by 1.5 times compared with the control. This indicates that there is a change in the intensity of the transport of synaptic vesicles in PD. In addition, a reduction of endocytosis activity was observed. This type of effect has been observed in model organisms with induced PD [45]; however, our data were generated using samples of the peripheral blood of patients with PD, which represents the first report of this kind.

4. Conclusion

In this study, we demonstrated a significant change in the levels of transcripts included in the large groups of processes associated with the functioning of the immune system and cellular transport. Moreover, a significant change in the splicing of genes involved in cellular-transport processes was shown in our study. Alternative splicing should be considered as another pathway of regulation of gene expression [46]. In most cases, changes in the alternative splicing of genes lead to a decrease in the levels of basic transcripts and are likely to increase the levels of alternative transcripts. It is possible that disturbances in the functioning of the vesicular transport are associated with changes in the alternative splicing of genes that encode proteins that are directly involved in endocytosis and exocytosis. In general, it seems that several independent events that occur in nerve cells, such as the disturbance of processes of vesicular transport and of the immune system and possibly even several currently unknown processes, affect the development of PD simultaneously.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (Projects no. 12-04-01183-a and no. 13-04-40376-H) and the programs of the Russian Academy of Sciences (Molecular and Cellular Biology, Fundamental Sciences for Medicine).

References

  1. L. M. de Lau and M. M. Breteler, “Epidemiology of Parkinson's disease,” Lancet Neurology, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 525–535, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. H. Ehringer and O. Hornykiewicz, “Distribution of noradrenaline and dopamine (3-hydroxytyramine) in the human brain and their behavior in diseases of the extrapyramidal system,” Klinische Wochenschrift, vol. 38, pp. 1236–1239, 1960. View at: Google Scholar
  3. R. L. Albin, A. B. Young, and J. B. Penney, “The functional anatomy of basal ganglia disorders,” Trends in Neurosciences, vol. 12, no. 10, pp. 366–375, 1989. View at: Google Scholar
  4. S. Saiki, S. Sato, and N. Hattori, “Molecular pathogenesis of Parkinson's disease: update,” Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, vol. 83, no. 4, pp. 430–436, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. M. I. Shadrina, P. A. Slominsky, and S. A. Limborska, “Molecular mechanisms of pathogenesis of Parkinson's disease,” International Review of Cell and Molecular Biology, vol. 281, pp. 229–266, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. M. R. Cookson, G. Xiromerisiou, and A. Singleton, “How genetics research in Parkinson's disease is enhancing understanding of the common idiopathic forms of the disease,” Current Opinion in Neurology, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 706–711, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  7. F. Simunovic, M. Yi, Y. Wang et al., “Gene expression profiling of substantia nigra dopamine neurons: further insights into Parkinson's disease pathology,” Brain, vol. 132, part 7, pp. 1795–1809, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. E. Grünblatt, S. Mandel, J. Jacob-Hirsch et al., “Gene expression profiling of parkinsonian substantia nigra pars compacta; alterations in ubiquitin-proteasome, heat shock protein, iron and oxidative stress regulated proteins, cell adhesion/cellular matrix and vesicle trafficking genes,” Journal of Neural Transmission, vol. 111, no. 12, pp. 1543–1573, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. K. Bossers, G. Meerhoff, R. Balesar et al., “Analysis of gene expression in Parkinson's disease: possible involvement of neurotrophic support and axon guidance in dopaminergic cell death,” Brain Pathology, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 91–107, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. M. A. Hauser, Y.-J. Li, H. Xu et al., “Expression profiling of substantia nigra in Parkinson disease, progressive supranuclear palsy, and frontotemporal dementia with parkinsonism,” Archives of Neurology, vol. 62, no. 6, pp. 917–921, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. E. Mutez, L. Larvor, F. Leprêtre et al., “Transcriptional profile of Parkinson blood mononuclear cells with LRRK2 mutation,” Neurobiology of Aging, vol. 32, no. 10, pp. 1839–1848, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. C. R. Scherzer, A. C. Eklund, L. J. Morse et al., “Molecular markers of early Parkinson's disease based on gene expression in blood,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 104, no. 3, pp. 955–960, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. L. Soreq, Z. Israel, H. Bergman, and H. Soreq, “Advanced microarray analysis highlights modified neuro-immune signaling in nucleated blood cells from Parkinson's disease patients,” Journal of Neuroimmunology, vol. 201-202, pp. 227–236, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. B. S. Fahn and R. Elton, “Committee MotUD: unified Parkinson's disease rating scale,” in Recent Developments in Parkinson's Disease, vol. 2, pp. 153–164, Macmillan Health Care Information, Florham Park, NY, USA, 1987. View at: Google Scholar
  15. C. G. Goetz, W. Poewe, O. Rascol et al., “Movement Disorder Society Task Force report on the Hoehn and Yahr staging scale: status and recommendations,” Movement Disorders, vol. 19, no. 9, pp. 1020–1028, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. A. J. Hughes, S. E. Daniel, L. Kilford, and A. J. Lees, “Accuracy of clinical diagnosis of idiopathic Parkinson's disease: a clinico-pathological study of 100 cases,” Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 181–184, 1992. View at: Google Scholar
  17. R. J. Keyser, D. Lombard, R. Veikondis, J. Carr, and S. Bardien, “Analysis of exon dosage using MLPA in South African Parkinson's disease patients,” Neurogenetics, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 305–312, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. O. Scarciolla, F. Brancati, E. M. Valente et al., “Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification assay for simultaneous detection of Parkinson's disease gene rearrangements,” Movement Disorders, vol. 22, no. 15, pp. 2274–2278, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. T. Barrett, D. B. Troup, S. E. Wilhite et al., “NCBI GEO: archive for functional genomics data sets-10 years on,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. D1005–D1010, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. R. Edgar, M. Domrachev, and A. E. Lash, “Gene Expression Omnibus: NCBI gene expression and hybridization array data repository,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 207–210, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  21. D. W. Huang, B. T. Sherman, and R. A. Lempicki, “Bioinformatics enrichment tools: paths toward the comprehensive functional analysis of large gene lists,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. D. W. Huang, B. T. Sherman, and R. A. Lempicki, “Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources,” Nature Protocols, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 44–57, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. Y. Hochberg and Y. Benjamini, “More powerful procedures for multiple significance testing,” Statistics in Medicine, vol. 9, no. 7, pp. 811–818, 1990. View at: Google Scholar
  24. S. J. Kiddle, M. Sattlecker, P. Proitsi et al., “Candidate blood proteome markers of Alzheimer's disease onset and progression: a systematic review and replication study,” Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 515–531, 2014. View at: Google Scholar
  25. S. Mukherjee, S. Kim, V. K. Ramanan et al., “Gene-based GWAS and biological pathway analysis of the resilience of executive functioning,” Brain Imaging and Behavior, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 110–118, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. C. K. Glass, K. Saijo, B. Winner, M. C. Marchetto, and F. H. Gage, “Mechanisms underlying inflammation in neurodegeneration,” Cell, vol. 140, no. 6, pp. 918–934, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. P. L. McGeer, S. Itagaki, B. E. Boyes, and E. G. McGeer, “Reactive microglia are positive for HLA-DR in the substantia nigra of Parkinson's and Alzheimer's disease brains,” Neurology, vol. 38, no. 8, pp. 1285–1291, 1988. View at: Google Scholar
  28. Y. Ouchi, E. Yoshikawa, Y. Sekine et al., “Microglial activation and dopamine terminal loss in early Parkinson's disease,” Annals of Neurology, vol. 57, no. 2, pp. 168–175, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. X. Su, K. A. Maguire-Zeiss, R. Giuliano, L. Prifti, K. Venkatesh, and H. J. Federoff, “Synuclein activates microglia in a model of Parkinson's disease,” Neurobiology of Aging, vol. 29, no. 11, pp. 1690–1701, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. A. Klegeris, S. Pelech, B. I. Giasson et al., “α-Synuclein activates stress signaling protein kinases in THP-1 cells and microglia,” Neurobiology of Aging, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 739–752, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. W. Zhang, T. Wang, Z. Pei et al., “Aggregated α-synuclein activates microglia: a process leading to disease progression in Parkinson's disease,” FASEB Journal, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 533–542, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. I. Ahmed, R. Tamouza, M. Delord et al., “Association between Parkinson's disease and the HLA-DRB1 locus,” Movement Disorders, vol. 27, no. 9, pp. 1104–1110, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. T. H. Hamza, C. P. Zabetian, A. Tenesa et al., “Common genetic variation in the HLA region is associated with late-onset sporadic Parkinson's disease,” Nature Genetics, vol. 42, no. 9, pp. 781–785, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. A. Auffret, J. Mariani, and C. Rovira, “Age-related progressive synaptic dysfunction: the critical role of presenilin 1,” Reviews in the Neurosciences, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 239–250, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  35. A. J. Milnerwood and L. A. Raymond, “Early synaptic pathophysiology in neurodegeneration: insights from Huntington's disease,” Trends in Neurosciences, vol. 33, no. 11, pp. 513–523, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. J. J. Palop and L. Mucke, “Amyloid-Β-induced neuronal dysfunction in Alzheimer's disease: from synapses toward neural networks,” Nature Neuroscience, vol. 13, no. 7, pp. 812–818, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. E. D. Plowey and C. T. Chu, “Synaptic dysfunction in genetic models of Parkinson's disease: a role for autophagy?” Neurobiology of Disease, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 60–67, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. D. A. Scott, I. Tabarean, Y. Tang, A. Cartier, E. Masliah, and S. Roy, “A pathologic cascade leading to synaptic dysfunction in α-synuclein-induced neurodegeneration,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 30, no. 24, pp. 8083–8095, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. J. Ule, A. Ule, J. Spencer et al., “Nova regulates brain-specific splicing to shape the synapse,” Nature Genetics, vol. 37, no. 8, pp. 844–852, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. B. J. Blencowe, “Alternative splicing: new insights from global analyses,” Cell, vol. 126, no. 1, pp. 37–47, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. P. Mazin, J. Xiong, X. Liu et al., “Widespread splicing changes in human brain development and aging,” Molecular Systems Biology, vol. 9, article 633, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. L. Buée, T. Bussière, V. Buée-Scherrer, A. Delacourte, and P. R. Hof, “Tau protein isoforms, phosphorylation and role in neurodegenerative disorders,” Brain Research Reviews, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 95–130, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. B. K. Dredge, A. D. Polydorides, and R. B. Darnell, “The splice of life: alternative splicing and neurological disease,” Nature Reviews Neuroscience, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 43–50, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. K. Beyer and A. Ariza, “Alpha-synuclein posttranslational modification and alternative splicing as a trigger for neurodegeneration,” Molecular Neurobiology, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 509–524, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. J. Burré, M. Sharma, T. Tsetsenis, V. Buchman, M. R. Etherton, and T. C. Südhof, “α-Synuclein promotes SNARE-complex assembly in vivo and in vitro,” Science, vol. 329, no. 5999, pp. 1663–1667, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. N. J. Maragakis, M. Dykes-Hoberg, and J. D. Rothstein, “Altered expression of the glutamate transporter EAAT2b in neurological disease,” Annals of Neurology, vol. 55, no. 4, pp. 469–477, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2014 Anelya Kh. Alieva et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder
Views1312
Downloads519
Citations

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted research articles as well as case reports and case series related to COVID-19. Review articles are excluded from this waiver policy. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.