BioMed Research International

BioMed Research International / 2014 / Article
Special Issue

BIODESERT: Exploring and Exploiting the Microbial Resource of Hot and Cold Deserts

View this Special Issue

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2014 |Article ID 924235 |

Imen Nouioui, Faten Ghodhbane-Gtari, Maria P. Fernandez, Abdellatif Boudabous, Philippe Normand, Maher Gtari, "Absence of Cospeciation between the Uncultured Frankia Microsymbionts and the Disjunct Actinorhizal Coriaria Species", BioMed Research International, vol. 2014, Article ID 924235, 9 pages, 2014.

Absence of Cospeciation between the Uncultured Frankia Microsymbionts and the Disjunct Actinorhizal Coriaria Species

Academic Editor: Ameur Cherif
Received04 Mar 2014
Revised25 Mar 2014
Accepted27 Mar 2014
Published22 Apr 2014


Coriaria is an actinorhizal plant that forms root nodules in symbiosis with nitrogen-fixing actinobacteria of the genus Frankia. This symbiotic association has drawn interest because of the disjunct geographical distribution of Coriaria in four separate areas of the world and in the context of evolutionary relationships between host plants and their uncultured microsymbionts. The evolution of Frankia-Coriaria symbioses was examined from a phylogenetic viewpoint using multiple genetic markers in both bacteria and host-plant partners. Total DNA extracted from root nodules collected from five species: C. myrtifolia, C. arborea, C. nepalensis, C. japonica, and C. microphylla, growing in the Mediterranean area (Morocco and France), New Zealand, Pakistan, Japan, and Mexico, respectively, was used to amplify glnA gene (glutamine synthetase), dnaA gene (chromosome replication initiator), and the nif DK IGS (intergenic spacer between nifD and nifK genes) in Frankia and the matK gene (chloroplast-encoded maturase K) and the intergenic transcribed spacers (18S rRNA-ITS1-5.8S rRNA-ITS2-28S rRNA) in Coriaria species. Phylogenetic reconstruction indicated that the radiations of Frankia strains and Coriaria species are not congruent. The lack of cospeciation between the two symbiotic partners may be explained by host shift at high taxonomic rank together with wind dispersal and/or survival in nonhost rhizosphere.

1. Introduction

The genus Frankia comprises nitrogen-fixing actinobacteria that are able to induce perennial root nodules on woody dicotyledonous plants called actinorhizals [1]. The actinorhizal plant families belong to three dicotyledonous orders: Fagales (Betulaceae,Casuarinaceae, and Myricaceae), Rosales (Elaeagnaceae, Rhamnaceae, and Rosaceae), and Cucurbitales (Coriariaceae and Datiscaceae) [2]. Analysis of the molecular phylogeny of members of Frankia genus consistently identifies four main clusters regardless of the typing locus used [3]. Three symbiotic Frankia clusters containing strains able to establish effective nodules and fulfill Koch’s postulates and one atypical with strains unable to establish effective nodulation on their host plants have been defined among Frankia genera. Cluster 1 includes Frankia strains in association with Betulaceae, Myricaceae, and Casuarinaceae. Cluster 2 contains Frankia nodulating species from the Coriariaceae, Datiscaceae, and Rosaceae families as well as Ceanothus of the Rhamnaceae. Frankia strains in cluster 3 form effective root nodules on plants from members of the Myricaceae, Rhamnaceae, Elaeagnaceae, and Gymnostoma of the Casuarinaceae.

Symbiotic Frankia strains have been only isolated from Fagales (Frankia cluster 1) and the families Elaeagnaceae and Rhamnaceae (Frankia cluster 3) of the Rosales, while Frankia of cluster 2 have still not yet been isolated in culture despite repeated attempts [2]. The position in the Frankia phylogenetic tree of cluster 2 relative to the other clusters has varied depending on the marker used. It was proposed at the base using glnA and 16S rRNA genes [4, 5], derived with ITS 16S–23S rRNA genes [6] and concatenated gyrB, nifH and glnII genes [7] and should be clarified by the upcoming whole genome phylogeny. Nevertheless, a position at the base of all symbiotic lineages has been retained in the latest treatment of Bergey’s manual [8].

Cross-inoculation studies using crushed nodules suggest that cluster 2 strains form a separate and unique host specificity group [911], even though provenances from the full geographical range have not yet been tested. Despite the high taxonomic diversity of host plants belonging to the cross-inoculation group of cluster 2 and its disjunct range, uncultured Frankia in root nodules of several host plants have so far shown a low level of diversity regardless of the typing locus used [6, 7, 1116], suggesting a recent emergence, a strong and recent evolutionary bottleneck, or a nonrepresentative sampling. The time of emergence of all Frankia lineages is poorly documented as no convincing fossil remains. An equivalence between 16S rRNA sequences distance and time of emergence has been proposed by Ochman and Wilson [17] where 1% is equivalent to 50 million years, and since 4% divergence exists between Frankia cluster 2 and the other clusters, one would conclude that Frankia emerged 200  million years ago [5], which would mean that there is missing diversity either due to a recent evolutionary bottleneck or due to a lack of sampling [16]. A possibility thus exists that the missing variability in cluster 2 strains is due to the fact that sampling has so far been limited essentially to North American and Mediterranean areas.

Evidence for cospeciation has been found so far only in the case of Casuarina species growing in Australia and their Frankia [18] that are in their immense majority resistant to growth in pure culture. Among actinorhizal plants of the Cucurbitales subclade, the family Coriariaceae, with only one genus, Coriaria, contains about 17 species [19] that occur in four disjunct areas of the world: the Mediterranean, Southeast Asia, Central and South America, and the Pacific islands of New Zealand and Papua New Guinea [2024]. Yokoyama et al. [19] considered that the Eurasian species are basal and have emerged some 60 million years ago. This date is in agreement with the 65 million years proposed by Bell et al. [25] based on multiple genes (rbcL, 18S rDNA, atpB) phylogeny, while the same authors propose an emergence of the Casuarinaceae at about 30 million years.

The present study was aimed at testing the hypothesis of cospeciation between uncultured Frankia microsymbionts and their Coriaria host species sampled from sites covering the full geographical range of the genus: Coriaria myrtifolia (Morocco and France), C. nepalensis (Pakistan), C. arborea (New Zealand), C. japonica (Japan), and C. microphylla (Mexico).

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. DNA Extraction, PCR Amplification, and Sequencing

Root nodules from naturally occurring Coriaria species (Table 1) were kindly provided by Dr. María Valdés (Escuela Nacional de Ciencias Biológicas, México, DF, México), Dr. Sajjad Mirza (National Institute for Biotechnology Genetic Engineering, Faisalabad, Pakistan), Dr. Warwick Silvester (University of Waikato, Waikato, New Zealand), Dr. Kawther Benbrahim (University of Fes, Fes, Morocco), Dr. Takashi Yamanaka (Forest and Forestry Products Research Institute, Ibaraki, Japan), and Dr. Jean-Claude Cleyet-Marel (INRA-IRD, Montpellier, France). Individual lobes were selected, surface-sterilized in 30% (vol/vol) H2O2, and rinsed several times with distilled sterile water. The DNA extraction from single nodule lobes was performed as previously described by Rouvier et al. [26]. Nodule lobes were crushed with sterile plastic mortars and pestles in 300 μL of extraction buffer (100 mM Tris (pH 8), 20 mM EDTA, 1.4 M NaCl, 2% (wt/vol) CTAB (cetyltrimethyl ammonium bromide), and 1% (wt/vol) PVPP (polyvinyl polypyrrolidone)). The homogenates were incubated at 65°C for 60min, extracted with chloroform-isoamyl alcohol (24 : 1, vol/vol) and the resulting DNA was ethanol-precipitated and resolubilized. The extracted DNA was used for PCR amplification of both bacterial and plant DNA regions using the primers listed in Table 2. The amplicons were then cycle-sequenced in both directions using an ABI cycle sequencing kit (Applied Biosystem 3130). The nucleotide sequences obtained in this study were deposited in the NCBI nucleotide sequence database under the accession numbers given in Table 1.

SpeciesLocality coordinates/altitude (asl)Nodule labelsPlant sequence accession numberBacterial sequence accession numberReferences
ITS1-ITS2matKglnAdnaAIGS nifD-K

C. myrtifolia Morocco
Oued El Koub, Ouezzane: 35°01′879N/05°20′565E/140 mCmMs1KC796592KC796601KC796522KC796582KC796555This study
This study
This study
This study
Bab Berred, Chefchaouen: 35°00′979N/04°58′092′′E/1290 mCmM1aKC796590KC796599KC796517KC796578KC796550This study
CmM1bKC796518KC796579KC796551This study
CmM1cKC796519KC796580KC796552This study
CmM2aKC796591KC796600KC796520KC796553This study
CmM2bKC796521KC796581KC796554This study
Nyons, 44°21′46.50′′N/5°08′21.82′′E/259 mCmNy1KC796598KC796603KC796531KC796591KC796564This study

This study
This study
This study
This study
Montpellier, 43°36′51.48′′N/3°52′23.97′′E/41 mCmF1KC796526KC796586KC796559This study
CmF2KC796593KC796602KC796527KC796587KC796560This study

This study
This study
This study
 AF280102Yang et al., unpublished
AB016459(Yokoyama et al., 2000 [19])

C. japonica Japan
Tosa district, +33°45′39.18′′, +133°27′42, 89′′/10 mCjJAKC796605KC796536KC796503KC796576This study
CjJBKC796594KC796537KC796504KC796577This study
This study
This study
This study
AF280101Yang et al., unpublished
AB016456(Yokoyama et al., 2000 [19])

C. nepalensis Pakistan
Murree, +33°54′15′′N 73°23′25′′E/33.9042°N 73.3903°E/2291.2 mCnP1KC796597KC796607KC796544KC796508KC796584This study
CnP2  KC796545KC796509KC796585This study
CnP3KC796546KC796510KC796586This study
AF280103Yang et al., unpublished

C. arborea New Zealand
Hapuku river, North Canterbury, South island: −42°23′42.24′′, +173°41′18.07′′/64 mCaNZ1KC796595KC796604KC796542KC796511KC796581This study
CaNZ2KC796543KC796512KC796582This study
CaNZ3KC796544KC796513KC796583This study
  AB16454(Yokoyama et al., 2000 [19])
EF635457Rotherham et al., unpublished
EF635475Rotherham et al., unpublished
AF277293Yang et al., unpublished

C. microphylla Mexico
Morelos, 99°30′, 19°30′/2400 m CmicMx1KC796596KC796606KC796547KC796514KC796587This study
CmicMx2KC796548KC796515KC796588This study
CmicMx3KC796549KC796516KC796589This study
AY091813Yang et al., unpublished
AB016458(Yokoyama et al., 2000 [19])

C. intermedia AF280100Yang et al., unpublished
  AB016455(Yokoyama et al., 2000 [19])

C. terminalis AY091817Yang et al., unpublished

C. ruscifolia AY091815Yang et al., unpublished
AY091814Yang et al., unpublished
AF280104Yang et al., unpublished
AB016462(Yokoyama et al., 2000 [19])

C. sarmentosa AY091816Yang et al., unpublished
AB016464(Yokoyama et al., 2000 [19])

C. papuana AB016461(Yokoyama et al., 2000 [19])

Datisca glomerata   CP002801CP002801CP002801(Persson et al., 2011 [50])
AY968449  Zhang et al., unpublished
AF485250 Forrest and Hollingsworth

Casuarina equisetifolia CP000249CP000249CP000249(Normand et al., 2007 [51])
AB015462Sogo et al., unpublished
AY864057Herbert et al., unpublished

Gene primersSequence (5′-3′)Amplicons approximate size (bp)References

 DB41 TTCTTCATCCACGACCCG 500 (Clawson et al., 2004 [4])
 F7154_dnaAF GAGGARTTCACCAACGACTTCAT 700Bautista et al. unpublished
IGS nifD-K
 F9372_nifD1 5 GTCATGCTCGCCGTCGGNG 700This study
 F9373_nifD2 5 ACCGGCTACGAGTTCGCNCA 700This study
 ITS1 TCCGTAGGTGAACCTGCGG700 (White et al., 1990 [52])

2.2. Phylogenetic Analysis

Frankia strain CcI3 and Casuarina equisetifolia were used as outgroups in this study because they are physiologically distinct from the group studied yet phylogenetically close. The data sets were completed with homologous sequences present in the databases (Table 1). Alignments of Frankia glnA, dnaA, and IGS nifD-K and Coriaria matK and 18S rRNA-ITS1-5.8S rRNA-ITS2-28S rRNA were generated with ClustalW [27], manually edited with MEGA 5.0 [28]. Bacterial and plant sequences were separately concatenated and then used to examine maximum-likelihood cladogram evolutionary relationships of each symbiotic partner using 1000 bootstraps by following the GTR + G base substitution model. The distance between the sequences was calculated using Kimura’s two-parameter model [29]. Phylogenetic trees were constructed using the Neighbor-Joining method [30] with 1000 bootstraps [31] as implemented in MEGA 5.0. In parallel, a Bayesian inference was realized with MrBayes [32] using the GTR + G model and 1,000,000 generations.

A statistical test for the presence of congruence between Coriaria and Frankia phylogenies was evaluated through global distance-based fitting in ParaFit program [33] as implemented in CopyCat [34] and tests of random association were performed with 9999 permutations globally across both phylogenies for each association.

An additional statistical test for correlation between geographical distances (obtained using and phylogenetic distances was made using Pearson’s r correlation implemented in the R software [35].

3. Results

To avoid taxonomic ambiguities, DNAs from both Coriaria hosts and Frankia microsymbionts were characterized on the same root nodule tissues. The method of DNA isolation from root nodules used in this study yielded PCR-amplifiable DNA for both bacterial and plant PCR target sequences in all cases. However, in several instances it was easier to amplify Frankia than Coriaria DNA, which may have been mostly due to the specificity of the primer sets used. Thus, in this study, new primers were designed (Table 2).

For the bacterial microsymbionts, the average uncorrected p-distances (proportion of differences between sequences) were computed for each region and were found to be relatively small for dnaA (), intermediate for glnA (), and high for IGS nifD-K region (). Blast analyses of the individual genes permitted assigning them all to Frankia cluster 2. Nearly 3000 nucleotides were obtained by concatenating sequences of the three DNA regions.

Sequences variation for Coriaria species was small based on matK gene () compared to ITS1-ITS2 sequences (). By concatenating matK and ITS1- ITS2 region, a composite sequence of 1500 nt was used for phylogenetic inference.

All studied sequences were analyzed independently to test for incongruence between the data sets for each symbiotic partner. Similar topologies have been generally observed between phylogenetic trees inferred from glnA, dnaA, and IGS nifD-K sequences for Frankia and from matK and ITS sequences for Coriaria regardless of the used phylogenetic methods (not shown).

The topologies of the trees obtained for the two symbiotic partners were not congruent (Figure 1). Moreover, global distance-based ParaFit analysis recovered mostly random associations between Frankia and Coriaria host plant species () and rejected cospeciation hypothesis. On the microbial side, the New Zealand microsymbionts were at the root (Group A); then three groups emerged, group B comprising the Pakistani, Mexican, and Mediterranean symbionts from France, group C comprising microsymbionts from Morocco, and then group D comprising French and Japanese microsymbionts as well as the Dg1 reference sequence obtained initially from a Pakistani soil. On the host plant side, group 1 at the root comprises New Zealand and South American sequences, while group 2 comprises the Japanese, Mediterranean, and Pakistani sequences.

On the other hand, no significant correlations were found for Frankia symbionts ( = 0.772; Fgeneticdist = (geogdist × 5.830) + 2.541) nor for the Coriaria host plants ( = 0.883; Fgeneticdist = (geogdist × 2.023) + 6.460) (data not shown).

4. Discussion

Cospeciation has been postulated to have occurred in some Frankia actinorhizal host plants, in particular in the Casuarina-Frankia cluster 1b [18] but not in Alnus-infective and Elaeagnus-infective Frankia strains where many isolates able to fulfill Koch’s postulates have been obtained. To test if cospeciation was general or an exception, it was decided to study uncultured Frankia microsymbionts and representative Coriaria hosts, a lineage where no Frankia isolate exists and where geographic discontinuities may have limited dispersion. DNA sequences were obtained from root nodules collected from New Zealand (C. arborea), Pakistan (C. nepalensis), Japan (C. japonica), Mexico (C. microphylla), and France and Morocco (C. myrtifolia) and multiple molecular markers were analyzed for phylogenetic inference.

Paleontological data based on macrofossils and pollen fossils have brought several authors [3640] to conclude that the Coriariaceae had a Laurasian origin (North America and Eurasia). There have been a few dissenting opinions, in particular those of Croizat [41] and Schuster [42] who considered that Coriaria originated in Gondwana and migrated to the Northern Hemisphere. However, such paleontological studies are not very convincing, as it is recognizably hard to ascribe fossils to a given family and even more so to a given genus. Thus, several authors have been surprised by the results of molecular phylogeny positioning Coriariaceae close to the Datiscaceae. Molecular approaches would thus give support to a Gondwanan origin.

Yokoyama et al. [19] proposed that Coriaria species had emerged 59–63 million years ago, which is coherent with the date of 70 million years proposed by Bell et al. [25], considerably older than that proposed (30 million years) by the same authors for the Casuarinaceae.

Topology and clustering of Coriaria phylogeny obtained in the current study are similar to those obtained by Yokoyama et al. [19], while the position at the base of the host plant species from New Zealand, C. arborea, and the South American C. ruscifolia and C. microphylla species was contrary to that of Yokoyama et al. [19] who found the Eurasian species at the base using rbcL (a large subunit of ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase) and matK (maturase K) genes. The present study suggests that the Coriaria ancestor may have emerged between Asia and NZ and then dispersed worldwide and that the Asian lineage may have given rise relatively recently to the Mediterranean species, while the NZ lineage gave rise to the North American species (Figure 2).

Previous studies had concluded that Frankia cluster 2 had a low genetic diversity [6, 7, 16] but these studies had been focused on only part of the full diversity of the symbiotic Coriaria-Frankia, essentially in North America and Mediterranean. In this work we aimed to expand the scope of the study to the worldwide diversity and phylogeny of microsymbionts of Coriaria species. Four microbial subgroups were identified that did not fit to the geographic range of the host plants, while two host plant subgroups were identified. The position of subgroup A containing microsymbionts of New Zealand C. arborea at the base of Frankia cluster 2 is in agreement with previous study [16]. In view of previously reported data, members of cluster 2 Frankia studied here were found to have relatively higher sequences variation (p-distance = 0.0625) than those reported by Vanden Heuvel et al. [16] () based on the same 460 nt of the glnA gene.

Molecular clock dating suggests that Frankia genus has emerged much earlier, 125 Myr bp before the appearance of angiosperm fossils in the Cretaceous period and the extant actinorhizal plants [4]. Normand et al. [5] using the 4% divergence in the 16S rRNA between cluster 2 and other Frankia lineages as equivalent to 50 MY/1% distance [17] concluded that the genus Frankia had emerged long before the extant dicotyledonous lineages. These authors proposed Frankia cluster 2 as the proto-Frankia as nonsymbiotic ancestor of 62–130 Myr bp [43] and 100–200 Myr bp [5]. Since the distance in the 16S rRNA gene between cluster 1a (Frankia alni) and cluster 1b is less than 1%, the date of emergence of the Casuarina-infective lineage has been proposed to be less than 50 million years [5]. Thus the Casuarina/Frankia 1b lineage is considerably younger than the Coriaria/Frankia lineage and would have had less time to migrate out of its cradle and mingle with other hosts in its new territories and lose the cospeciation signal.

Symbiotic partnership often tends to become obligatory, as in the case of Casuarina host plants, where Frankia is only present in soils close to the host plant [44], which means that the bacterium loses autonomy and becomes dependent on its host. Speciation of the host could then lead to synchronous speciation of its microsymbiont unless dispersal through long-distance carriers such as winds or migratory birds occurred or if there is survival of Frankia cluster 2 in the rhizosphere of nonhosts as was recently demonstrated for Alnus glutinosa in Tunisia [45]. The numerous transitions seen in the Frankia phylogenetic tree from one continent to another would reinforce the idea.

Yokoyama et al. [19] concluded from their study of the Coriaria species phylogeny that the Eurasian species had diverged earlier and are more diverse than other groups, but that nevertheless the origin of the genus could have been in North America, whence the South America and the Pacific species could have originated. Our study brings us to suggest a third possibility, Oceania, which could also be the origin of this actinorhizal symbiosis, which can be concluded from phylogenetic inferences positioning both bacterial and host plant partners as at the base to Frankia-Coriaria symbiosis. Another element that would support this hypothesis is the large number of extant species there; according to Yokoyama et al. [19] New Zealand would be home to 8 of the 17 existing species. A similar argument has often been made to establish Sub-Saharan Africa as the cradle of humankind [46] or Mexico for maize [47].

Comparison of both the plant and the microbe phylogenetic topologies did not show any evidence for cospeciation of Frankia microsymbiontsand their Coriaria host species. The results obtained in this study suggest that Frankia microsymbionts hosted currently by Coriaria species had probably dispersed globally as a proto-Frankia, a free living and nonsymbiotic ancestor. In parallel, the proto-Coriaria then diversified into the extant Coriaria species that appear to have been retreating given their scattered distribution, a trend possibly reinforced recently due to man uprooting because of the toxicity of the fruits for mammals [48, 49]. It can thus be hypothesized that Coriaria appeared in the Pacific Islands more than 70 million years ago and presumably was symbiotic from the start, before dispersing over all continents as they drifted apart. The Coriaria species diversified in their different biotopes, as they saw the appearance of other plants hosting the same microsymbiont of Frankia cluster 2 such as Datiscaceae, Rosaceae, Ceanothus, or even nonhost species such as Alnus glutinosa that was recently found to host Frankia cluster 2 in its rhizosphere [45]. Members of these alternative host plant species cooccur sympatrically with Coriaria such as Ceanothus and Purshia species in Mexico and Datisca cannabina in Pakistan. These Frankia cluster 2 host plant species have more extended geographic distribution and overlap in some instances Coriaria’s disjunct area and as a result can compensate Frankia microsymbionts remoteness, which would thus obscure the cospeciation signal. Cospeciation may also occur but subsequently is lost after bacterial mixing and fitness selection in the presence of “indigenous” and “dispersal” symbionts.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.


This work is supported by CMCU (Comité Mixte Tuniso-Français pour la Coopération Inter-Universitaire No. 10/G0903). The authors are grateful to Dr. María Valdés (Escuela Nacional de Ciencias Biológicas, México, México), Dr. Sajjad Mirza (National Institute for Biotechnology Genetic Engineering, Faisalabad, Pakistan), Dr. Warwick Silvester (University of Waikato, Waikato, New Zealand), Dr. Kawther Benbrahim and Dr. A. Ennabili (University of Fes, Fes, Morocco), Mr. Spick (Montpellier Botanical garden, France), Dr. J. C. Cleyet-Marel (Montpellier INRA, France), Mr. D. Moukouanga (IRD Montpellier, France), and Dr. Takashi Yamanaka (Forest and Forestry Products Research Institute, Ibaraki, Japan) for providing Coriaria nodules.


  1. M. P. Lechevalier, “Taxonomy of the genus Frankia (Actinomycetales),” International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 1994. View at: Google Scholar
  2. D. R. Benson, B. D. Vanden Heuvel, and D. Potter, “Actinorhizal symbioses: diversity and biogeography,” in Plant Microbiology, M. Gillings, Ed., pp. 97–127, BIOS Scientific Publishers, Oxford, UK, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  3. M. Gtari, L. S. Tisa, and P. Normand, “Diversity of Frankia strains, actinobacteria symbionts of actinorhizal plants,” in Symbiotic Endophytes, Soil Biology, R. Aroca, Ed., vol. 37, Chapter 7, pp. 123–148, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  4. M. L. Clawson, A. Bourret, and D. R. Benson, “Assessing the phylogeny of Frankia-actinorhizal plant nitrogen-fixing root nodule symbioses with Frankia 16S rRNA and glutamine synthetase gene sequences,” Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 131–138, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. P. Normand, S. Orso, B. Cournoyer et al., “Molecular phylogeny of the genus Frankia and related genera and emendation of the family Frankiaceae,” International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
  6. F. Ghodhbane-Gtari, I. Nouioui, M. Chair, A. Boudabous, and M. Gtari, “16S-23S rRNA intergenic spacer region variability in the genus Frankia,” Microbial Ecology, vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 487–495, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. I. Nouioui, F. Ghodhbane-Gtari, N. J. Beauchemin, L. S. Tisa, and M. Gtari, “Phylogeny of members of the Frankia genus based on gyrB, nifH and glnII sequences,” Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, vol. 100, no. 4, pp. 579–587, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. P. Normand and D. R. Benson, “Genus I Frankia Brunchorst 1886, 174AL,” in Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, The Actinobacteria, M. Goodfellow, P. Kämpfer, H.-J. Busse et al., Eds., vol. 5 of Bergey's Manual Trust, pp. 512–520, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  9. J. G. Torrey, “Cross-inoculation groups within Frankia and host-endosymbiont associations,” in The Biology of Frankia and Actinorhizal Plants, C. R. Schwintzer and J. D. Tjepkema, Eds., pp. 83–106, Academic Press, San Diego, Calif, USA, 1990. View at: Google Scholar
  10. S. J. Kohls, J. Thimmapuram, C. A. Buschena, M. W. Paschke, and J. O. Dawson, “Nodulation patterns of actinorhizal plants in the family Rosaceae,” Plant and Soil, vol. 162, no. 2, pp. 229–239, 1994. View at: Google Scholar
  11. M. S. Mirza, K. Pawlowski, F. Y. Hafeez, A. H. Chaudhary, and A. D. L. Akkermans, “Ultrastructure of the endophyte and localization of nifH transcripts in root nodules of Coriaria nepalensis Wall. by in situ hybridization,” New Phytologist, vol. 126, no. 1, pp. 131–136, 1994. View at: Google Scholar
  12. G. Nick, E. Paget, P. Simonet, A. Moiroud, and P. Normand, “The nodular endophytes of Coriaria spp. form a distinct lineage within the genus Frankia,” Molecular Ecology, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 175–181, 1992. View at: Google Scholar
  13. M. Bosco, S. Jamann, C. Chapelon, and S. P. Normand, “Frankia microsymbiont in Dryas drummondii nodules is closely related to the microsymbiont of Coriaria and genetically distinct from other characterized Frankia strains,” in Nitrogen Fixation with Non-Legumes, N. A. Hegazi, M. Fayez, and M. Monib, Eds., pp. 173–183, The American University in Cairo Press, 1994. View at: Google Scholar
  14. D. R. Benson, D. W. Stephens, M. L. Clawson, and W. B. Silvester, “Amplification of 16S rRNA genes from Frankia strains in root nodules of Ceanothus griseus, Coriaria arborea, Coriaria plumosa, Discaria toumatou, and Purshia tridentata,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 62, no. 8, pp. 2904–2909, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
  15. D. R. Benson and M. L. Clawson, “Evolution of the actinorhizal plant symbioses,” in Prokaryotic Nitrogen Fixation: A Model System for Analysis of Biological Process, E. W. Triplett, Ed., pp. 207–224, Horizon Scientific Press, Wymondham, UK, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  16. B. D. Vanden Heuvel, D. R. Benson, E. Bortiri, and D. Potter, “Low genetic diversity among Frankia spp. strains nodulating sympatric populations of actinorhizal species of Rosaceae, Ceanothus (Rhamnaceae) and Datisca glomerata (Datiscaceae) west of the Sierra Nevada (California),” Canadian Journal of Microbiology, vol. 50, no. 12, pp. 989–1000, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. H. Ochman and A. C. Wilson, “Evolution in bacteria: evidence for a universal substitution rate in cellular genomes,” Journal of Molecular Evolution, vol. 26, no. 1-2, pp. 74–86, 1987. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. P. Simonet, E. Navarro, C. Rouvier et al., “Co-evolution between Frankia populations and host plants in the family Casuarinaceae and consequent patterns of global dispersal,” Environmental Microbiology, vol. 1, no. 6, pp. 525–533, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  19. J. Yokoyama, M. Suzuki, K. Iwatsuki, and M. Hasebe, “Molecular phylogeny of Coriaria, with special emphasis on the disjunct distribution,” Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 11–19, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. R. D. O. Good, “The geography of the genus Coriaria,” New Phytologist, vol. 29, pp. 170–198, 1930. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. H. H. Allan, “Coriariaceae,” in Flora of New Zealand, L. B. Moore, Ed., pp. 300–305, Government printer, Wellington, New Zealand, 1961. View at: Google Scholar
  22. R. Melville, “Continental drift, mesozoic continents and the migrations of the angiosperms,” Nature, vol. 211, no. 5045, pp. 116–120, 1966. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. L. E. Skog, “The genus Coriaria Coriariaceae in the Western Hemisphere,” Rhodora, vol. 74, pp. 242–253, 1972. View at: Google Scholar
  24. R. Melville, “Vicarious plant distributions and paleogeography of the Pacific region,” in Vicariance Biogeography, G. Nelson and E. D. Rosen, Eds., pp. 413–435, Columbia University Press, New York, NY, USA, 1981. View at: Google Scholar
  25. C. D. Bell, D. E. Soltis, and P. S. Soltis, “The age and diversification of the angiosperms re-revisited,” American Journal of Botany, vol. 97, no. 8, pp. 1296–1303, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. C. Rouvier, J. Schwenke, Y. Prin et al., “Biologie et diversité génétique des souches de Frankia associées aux Casuarinacées,” Acta Botanica Gallica, vol. 143, pp. 567–580, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. J. D. Thompson, D. G. Higgins, and T. J. Gibson, “CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 22, no. 22, pp. 4673–4680, 1994. View at: Google Scholar
  28. K. Tamura, D. Peterson, N. Peterson, G. Stecher, M. Nei, and S. Kumar, “MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods,” Molecular Biology and Evolution, vol. 28, no. 10, pp. 2731–2739, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. M. Kimura, “A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences,” Journal of Molecular Evolution, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 111–120, 1980. View at: Google Scholar
  30. N. Saitou and M. Nei, “The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees,” Molecular Biology and Evolution, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 406–425, 1987. View at: Google Scholar
  31. J. Felsenstein, “Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap,” Evolution, vol. 39, pp. 783–791, 1985. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. F. Ronquist and J. P. Huelsenbeck, “MrBayes 3: bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models,” Bioinformatics, vol. 19, no. 12, pp. 1572–1574, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. P. Legendre, Y. Desdevises, and E. Bazin, “A statistical test for host-parasite coevolution,” Systematic Biology, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 217–234, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. J. P. Meier-Kolthoff, A. F. Auch, D. H. Huson, and M. Göker, “CopyCat: cophylogenetic analysis tool,” Bioinformatics, vol. 23, no. 7, pp. 898–900, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. R. Ihaka and R. Gentleman, “R: a language for data analysis and graphics,” Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 299–314, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
  36. A. N. Gladkova, “Fragments of the history of the Myricaceae family,” Pollen and Spore, vol. 4, p. 345, 1962. View at: Google Scholar
  37. J. A. Doyle, “Cretaceous angiosperm pollen of the Atlantic coastal plain and its evolutionnary significance,” Journal of the Arnold Arboretum, vol. 50, pp. 1–35, 1969. View at: Google Scholar
  38. P. H. Raven and D. I. Axelrod, “Angiosperm biogeography and past continental movements,” Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden, vol. 61, pp. 539–673, 1974. View at: Google Scholar
  39. J. Muller, “Fossil pollen records of extant angiosperms,” The Botanical Review, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 1–142, 1981. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. O. Eriksson and B. Bremer, “Pollination systems, dispersal modes, life forms, and diversification rates in angiosperm families,” Evolution, vol. 46, pp. 258–266, 1992. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. L. Croizat, Manual of Phytogeography: An Account of Plant Dispersal Throughout the World, Junk, The Hague, 1952.
  42. R. M. Schuster, “Plate tectonics and its bearing on the geographical origin and dispersal of angiosperms,” in Origin and Early Evolution of Angiosperms, C. B. Beck, Ed., pp. 48–138, Columbia University Press, New York, 1976. View at: Google Scholar
  43. S.-C. Jeong, A. Liston, and D. D. Myrold, “Molecular phylogeny of the genus Ceanothus (Rhamnaceae) using rbcL and ndhF sequences,” Theoretical and Applied Genetics, vol. 94, no. 6-7, pp. 852–857, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. J. F. Zimpfer, C. A. Smyth, and J. O. Dawson, “The capacity of Jamaican mine spoils, agricultural and forest soils to nodulate Myrica cerifera, Leucaena leucocephala and Casuarina cunninghamiana,” Physiologia Plantarum, vol. 99, no. 4, pp. 664–672, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. I. Nouioui, I. Sbissi, F. Ghodhbane-Gtari, K. Benbrahim, P. Normand, and M. Gtari, “First report on the occurrence of the uncultivated cluster 2 Frankia microsymbionts in soil outside the native actinorhizal host range area,” Journal of Biosciences, vol. 38, pp. 695–698, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. S. Ramachandran, O. Deshpande, C. C. Roseman, N. A. Rosenberg, M. W. Feldman, and L. L. Cavalli-Sforza, “Support from the relationship of genetic and geographic in human populations for a serial founder effect originating in Africa,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 102, no. 44, pp. 15942–15947, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. B. Prasanna, “Diversity in global maize germplasm: characterization and utilization,” Journal of Biosciences, vol. 37, pp. 843–855, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. L. De Haro, P. Pommier, L. Tichadou, M. Hayek-Lanthois, and J. Arditti, “Poisoning by Coriaria myrtifolia Linnaeus: a new case report and review of the literature,” Toxicon, vol. 46, no. 6, pp. 600–603, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. S. F. Belcher and T. R. Morton, “Tutu toxicity: three case reports of Coriaria arborea ingestion, review of literature and recommendations for management,” The New Zealand Medical Journal, vol. 126, pp. 103–109, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  50. T. Persson, D. R. Benson, P. Normand et al., “Genome sequence of “Candidatus Frankia datiscae” Dg1, the uncultured microsymbiont from nitrogen-fixing root nodules of the dicot Datisca glomerata,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 193, no. 24, pp. 7017–7018, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. P. Normand, P. Lapierre, L. S. Tisa et al., “Genome characteristics of facultatively symbiotic Frankia sp. strains reflect host range and host plant biogeography,” Genome Research, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 7–15, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. T. J. White, T. Bruns, S. Lee, and J. Taylor, “Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics,” in PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications, M. A. Innis, D. H. Gelfand, J. J. Sninsky, and T. J. White, Eds., pp. 315–322, Academic Press, San Diego, Calif, USA, 1990. View at: Google Scholar

Copyright © 2014 Imen Nouioui et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles