BioMed Research International

BioMed Research International / 2014 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2014 |Article ID 930907 |

Shi Yu, Shu Diao, Jinsong Wang, Gang Ding, Dongmei Yang, Zhipeng Fan, "Comparative Analysis of Proliferation and Differentiation Potentials of Stem Cells from Inflamed Pulp of Deciduous Teeth and Stem Cells from Exfoliated Deciduous Teeth", BioMed Research International, vol. 2014, Article ID 930907, 12 pages, 2014.

Comparative Analysis of Proliferation and Differentiation Potentials of Stem Cells from Inflamed Pulp of Deciduous Teeth and Stem Cells from Exfoliated Deciduous Teeth

Academic Editor: Yihong Gong
Received02 Mar 2014
Revised23 May 2014
Accepted28 May 2014
Published22 Jun 2014


Stem cells isolated from exfoliated deciduous teeth (SHEDs) are highly capable of proliferation and differentiation, and they represent good cell sources for mesenchymal stem cell- (MSC-) mediated dental tissue regeneration, but the supply of SHEDs is limited. A previous study found that stem cells could be isolated from inflamed tissues, but it is unknown whether primary dental pulp diagnosed with irreversible pulpitis might contain stem cells with appropriate tissue regeneration capacity. In this study, we aimed to isolate stem cells from both inflamed pulps of deciduous teeth (SCIDs) and SHEDs from Chinese children and to compare their proliferation and differentiation potentials. Our results showed that SCIDs were positive for cell surface markers, including CD105, CD90, and CD146, and they had high proliferation ability and osteogenic, adipogenic, and chondrogenic differentiation potentials. There was no significant difference in proliferation and differentiation potentials between SCIDs and SHEDs. The mRNA of inflammatory factors, including IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α, was expressed at similar levels in SCIDs and SHEDs, but SCIDs secreted more TNF-α protein. In conclusion, our in vitro results showed that SCIDs have proliferation and differentiation potentials similar to those of SHEDs. Thus, SCIDs represent a new potentially applicable source for MSC mediated tissue regeneration.

1. Introduction

Emerging tissue engineering and stem cell-based therapies hold promise for great advances in regenerative medicine. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are considered a good cell source for tissue regeneration. MSC populations have been isolated from dental tissues, including the dental pulp, periodontal ligament, and dental follicle [13]. These cells are multipotent, show osteo-/dentinogenic differentiation, and are capable of self-renewal. Recently, MSCs have been identified in inflamed dental pulp, inflamed periodontal ligament, and inflamed periapical tissues [49]. Studies have shown that MSCs isolated from inflamed dental tissues retained their regeneration potential, but they exhibited a marked reduction in differentiation potential, particularly for mineralized tissue [4, 7]. Alongi et al. reported that inflamed pulp tissues contained a population of MSCs with diminished stem cell properties, including reduced osteo-/dentinogenic differentiation [4]. Similarly, Park et al. showed that inflamed human periodontal ligament stem cells possessed significantly reduced potential for forming cementum-like tissues, compared to stem cells from healthy periodontal tissue [7]. Compared to MSCs from noninflamed dental pulp and dental follicles, MSCs from periapical lesions showed lower clonogenicity and self-renewal rates [8]. However, other researchers have reported different findings [5, 6]. Wang et al. found that MSCs derived from tissues with irreversible pulpitis demonstrated low colony formation capacity and a slightly low cell proliferation rate, but their STRO-1 expression, their ex vivo osteogenic induction, and their dentin sialophosphoprotein expression were similar to those of STRO-1-enriched pulp cells [5]. Pereira et al. also isolated stem cells from dental pulp (DPSCs) and found that DPSCs derived from inflamed and normal tissues were similar in morphology, proliferation rates, and differentiation potentials. Thus, they demonstrated that the inflammatory process did not affect the stem cell properties assessed [6].

Stem cells from human exfoliated deciduous teeth (SHEDs) are a population of highly proliferative, clonogenic cells capable of differentiating into a variety of cell types, including neural cells, adipocytes, and odontoblasts [1016]. The proliferation rate of SHEDs was significantly higher than that of DPSCs and bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (BMMSCs) [1012]. Studies showed that SHEDs were capable of generating robust amounts of bone and pulp/dentin complexes in vivo, and they could alleviate Parkinson’s disease [1316]. However, due to the physiological absorption of roots in deciduous teeth, only a small amount of dental pulp remains in exfoliated deciduous teeth; thus, the supply of SHEDs is limited.

In clinical settings, a diagnosis of irreversible pulpitis is treated by removing the entire pulp tissue from primary teeth with a pulpectomy. In primary teeth, a large portion of pulp may be viable tissue that contains stem cells. Recent studies have reported that viable stem cells are present in inflamed pulp deciduous tissue. However, those cells had highly dysfunctional MSC characteristics, stemness, and immunomodulatory properties [17]. Another study elucidated that in vitro characteristics of MSCs, including growth, proliferation, and viability, were associated with in vivo functions of MSCs that are important for therapeutic use [18]. In the present study, we isolated stem cells from inflamed pulp of deciduous teeth (SCIDs) from Chinese children and then examined proliferation, differentiation potentials, and the expression of inflammatory factors. We compared these characteristics to those of SHEDs to investigate the regenerative potential of SCIDs.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sample Collection and Cell Culture

Pulp tissues were obtained from primary teeth of patients (3–10 years of age) under approved guidelines set by Beijing Stomatological Hospital, Capital Medical University. All parents provided informed consent.

Exfoliated deciduous teeth were collected from 5 patients; all teeth were free of carious lesions. The pulps were separated from remnant crowns. Inflamed pulp of deciduous teeth was obtained by pulpectomy from 6 patients diagnosed with irreversible pulpitis. A portion of each inflamed pulp was fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS (pH 7.2) and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (HE) for pathological diagnosis.

All pulp samples were washed and digested in a solution of 3 mg/mL collagenase type I and 4 mg/mL dispase for 30–60 min at 37°C. Single cell suspensions were isolated and cultured as previously described [13]. Cells were grown in a humidified 5% CO2 incubator at 37°C in alpha modified Eagle’s medium (MEM, Invitrogen, California, USA) supplemented with 15% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Invitrogen), 2 mmol/L glutamine, 100 U/mL penicillin, and 100 μg/mL streptomycin (Invitrogen). The culture medium was changed every 3 days. SCIDs and SHEDs were used at passages 3–5 in subsequent experiments.

2.2. Characterization of SCIDs and SHEDs

SCIDs and SHEDs were labeled with fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated or phycoerythrin-conjugated antibodies and analyzed with flow cytometry. Cells from different individuals were mixed in equal proportions, and SCIDs and SHEDs were cultured separately. SCIDs and SHEDs were harvested with 0.25% trypsin, and cell aliquots (1.0 × 106 cells) were incubated for 1 h at room temperature with monoclonal antibodies specific for CD90, CD105, or CD146 (BD Biosciences, USA) [13, 10, 17, 19]. Expression profiles were analyzed by flow cytometry (Calibur; BD Biosciences).

2.3. Cell Growth Curves and Population Doubling Time

MSCs were seeded at a density of 5.0 × 104 cells/well into 6-well plates. Cells were counted at 3, 5, and 7 days after seeding. The results shown represent the mean values (±s.e.m.) of three separate experiments. To assess the population doubling time, cells were counted at 70–80% confluency. Population doubling time was calculated with the formula , where is the doubling time, is the time between cell counts, and C0 and Ct (in hours) are the initial cell count and the cell count after time , respectively.

2.4. Cell Counting Assay

MSCs were seeded at a density of 1.0 × 103 cells/well into 96-well plates. Cells were grown in 96-well plates for 24 h or 48 h after seeding. Then, a cell counting kit solution (Cell Counting kit-8, Dojindo, Japan) was added to each well of the plate, and absorbance was measured at 450 nm, according to the manufacturer’s protocol (Dojindo, Japan).

2.5. Alkaline Phosphatase Activity and Alizarin Red Staining

MSCs were seeded at a density of 2.0 × 105 cells/well into 6-well plates with routine medium. When cells reached 80–90% confluence, the medium was changed, and cells were grown in mineralization-inducing medium with the STEMPRO osteogenesis differentiation Kit (Invitrogen). After induction, cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde and stained with a solution of 0.25% naphthol AS-BI phosphate and 0.75% Fast red FRV with an alkaline phosphatase (ALP) staining kit, according to the manufacturer’s protocol (Sigma-Aldrich). Then, ALP activity was measured with an ALP activity kit, according to the manufacturer’s protocol (Sigma-Aldrich), and normalized to the protein concentrations. To detect mineralization, cells remained in the inducing medium for 2 weeks, and then they were fixed with 70% ethanol and stained with 2% Alizarin red (Sigma-Aldrich). To quantitatively measure calcium, Alizarin Red was destained with 10% cetylpyridinium chloride in 10 mM sodium phosphate for 60 min at room temperature. The calcium concentration was determined by measuring absorbance at 562 nm on a multiplate reader and comparing to a standard calcium curve prepared in the same solution. The final calcium level in each group was normalized to the total protein concentration, measured in a duplicate plate [19].

2.6. Oil Red O Staining

Adipogenic differentiation was induced with the STEMPRO Adipogenesis differentiation Kit (Invitrogen). MSCs were grown in the adipose-inducing media for 3 weeks. Next, cells were fixed with 10% formalin for at least 1 h at room temperature. Then, cells were stained with the Oil Red O working solution for 10 min. The proportion of Oil Red O-positive cells was determined by counting cells under a light microscope [20].

2.7. Alcian Blue Staining

Chondrogenic differentiation was induced with the STEMPRO chondrogenesis differentiation kit (Invitrogen). MSCs were grown in chondrogenic medium for 3 weeks. Then, cells were rinsed once with Dulbecco’s PBS and fixed with 4% formaldehyde solution for 30 min. After fixation, cells were rinsed with Dulbecco’s PBS, and then stained with 1% Alcian blue solution (prepared in 0.1 N HCl) for 30 min. Next, the cells were rinsed three times with 0.1 N HCl, and distilled water was added to neutralize the acidity. Cells were visualized under a light microscope, and images were captured for analysis. Blue staining indicated synthesis of proteoglycans by chondrocytes [20].

2.8. Real-Time Reverse Transcription-PCR

For real-time reverse transcription (RT)-PCR, 2 μg aliquots of RNA were synthesized with random hexamers and reverse transcriptase, according to the manufacturer’s protocol (Invitrogen). Real-time PCR was performed with the SYBR Green PCR kit (Qiagen, Germany) and an Icycler iQ Multi-color, Real-time PCR Detection System. The gene-specific primer sequences are shown in Supplementary Table 1 (in Supplementary Material available online at

2.9. Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA)

MSCs were seeded at a density of 2.0 × 105 cells/well into 6-well plates. At 48 h after seeding, the cells were spun down in a centrifuge, and the supernatant was collected to measure the cytokines. Expression levels of the cytokines TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6 were analyzed with separate ELISA kits for human TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6 cytokines (Dakewe Biotech Co., Ltd), according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Each sample, standard, and blank was assayed in triplicate. First, 100 μL of diluted Cytokine standard was added to standard wells, 100 μL of sample into sample wells, and 100 μL of blank solution into the blank wells. Then, 50 μL of diluted biotinylated antibody was added into all wells. The plate was covered with a plate cover and incubated according to instructions. Next, 100 μL of diluted streptavidin-HRP was added to all wells. After washing, 100 μL of TMB substrate solution was pipetted into all wells, including the blank wells, and incubated in the dark for 30 min at 37°C. The enzyme-substrate reaction was stopped by quickly pipetting 100 μL of Stop solution into each well. The OD values were measured at 450 nm within 15 min, with a multiplate reader. The results were calculated by comparing to the standards and blanks.

2.10. Statistical Analysis

All statistical calculations were performed with SPSSv.13.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) statistical software. Statistical significance was determined with the Student -test. A value ≤ 0.05 was considered significant.

3. Results

3.1. SCIDs Formed Colonies and Expressed CD90, CD105, and CD146

The SCIDs were derived from patients aged years and the SHEDs were derived from patients aged years. The primary pulps from irreversible pulpitis showed lymphocyte cell infiltration and angiotelectasis with HE staining (Figure 1(a)), which confirmed that these pulps were in an inflammatory state. Cells derived from the inflamed pulp could form colonies and showed typical fibroblast-like morphology (Figure 1(b)), similar to SHED cells (Figure 1(c)). SCIDs and SHEDs were both positive for CD90, CD105, and CD146 (Figure 1(d)).

3.2. Similar Cell Proliferation and Multidifferentiation Potentials for SCIDs and SHEDs

Cell proliferation was monitored over a period of 7 days after seeding. Cell growth curves showed that cell growth rates were similar for SCIDs and SHEDs at 1, 3, 5 and 7 days (Figure 1(e)). The cell counting assay showed no significant differences between SCIDs and SHEDs at 24 and 48 h (Figure 1(f)). Moreover, the average doubling times were not significantly different for SCIDs ( h) and SHEDs ( h). These results indicated that proliferation capacity was not significantly different between SCIDs and SHEDs.

Next, osteo-/dentinogenic differentiation potential was investigated by culturing SCIDs and SHEDs in osteogenic-inducing medium. ALP activity, an early marker for osteo-/dentinogenic differentiation, was similarly increased in SCIDs and SHEDs (Figures 2(a) and 2(c)). Two weeks after culturing the cells in osteogenic-inducing medium, alizarin red staining and quantitative calcium measurements revealed that mineralization was similarly enhanced in SCIDs and SHEDs after osteogenic induction (Figures 2(b) and 2(d)). Furthermore, real-time RT-PCR results showed that the expression levels of DSPP, DMP-1, BSP, and OCN were enhanced after 2 weeks of osteogenic induction (Figures 2(e)2(h)); in contrast, OPN expression did not significantly change after 2 weeks of induction, for both SCIDs and SHEDs (Figure 2(i)). These real-time RT-PCR results on cell makers were consistent with our other findings in undifferentiated and differentiated SCIDs and SHEDs.

After induction with adipogenic medium for 3 weeks, oil red O staining revealed similar lipid deposits in SCIDs and SHEDs (Figure 3(a)). Real-time RT-PCR results showed that PPARG, CEBPA, and LPL expression could be induced after culturing in adipogenic medium for 3 weeks. SCIDs and SHEDs showed no significant difference in expression before (time = 0) and after 3 weeks of induction (Figures 3(c)3(e)). However, after adipogenic induction, CD36 expression was increased in SCIDs, but not in SHEDs; nevertheless, the difference was not significant (Figure 3(b)).

After induction with chondrogenic medium for 3 weeks, Alcian blue staining revealed increased proteoglycan production in SCIDs and SHEDs (Figures 4(a) and 4(b)). Real-time RT-PCR showed that COL2 expression was induced after culturing in chondrogenic medium for 2 weeks, and the expression of these makers was not significantly different between SCIDs and SHEDs (Figure 4(c)). The expression of SOX9 was increased in SHEDs, but not in SCIDs, after chondrogenic induction. However, SOX9 expression levels were similar between SCIDs and SHEDs, both before and after differentiation (Figure 4(d)).

3.3. SCIDs Secreted More TNF-α Protein Than SHEDs

We monitored inflammatory cytokines, both at the mRNA level with real-time RT-PCR and at the protein level with ELISA. The results showed no significant differences between SCIDs and SHEDs in mRNA expression levels of IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α (Figure 4(e)). However, TNF-α protein secretion was significantly enhanced in SCIDs compared to SHEDs (Figure 4(f)); in contrast, SCIDs and SHEDs showed no significant difference in the secretion of IL-6 (Figure 4(f)). IL-1β secretion was undetectable in SCIDs and SHEDs in the ELISA assay (data not shown).

4. Discussion

Primary teeth that undergo pulpectomy are nearly free of root absorption, and the pulp tissues are nearly integrated. In contrast, exfoliated deciduous teeth typically have absorbed roots, and the remaining pulp tissues are limited. Thus, inflamed primary dental pulp may possess a large portion of viable pulp, but it remained unclear whether they contained stem cells with appropriate capacity for tissue regeneration.

In the present study, we isolated SCIDs and SHEDs and demonstrated that they both had the ability to form colonies, and they both could differentiate into osteo-/dentinoblasts, adipocytes, and chondrocytes. Previous studies have shown that MSCs in vitro showed growth, proliferation, and viability characteristics that accurately predicted MSC functions in vivo [18]. MSCs with good growth, proliferation, and viability were able to create vascularized, granulated tissues, and they supported long-term MSC engraftments. These discoveries strongly suggested that enhancing growth, proliferation, and viability in MSCs could enhance their potential for vascular and tissue regeneration. Our results showed that SCIDs and SHEDs possessed similar cell proliferation rates.

Considering the robust osteogenic ability of SHEDs and their successful application in dental and craniofacial regeneration, we focused on comparing osteo-/dentinogenic ability between SCIDs and SHEDs. We found that ALP activity and in vitro mineralization were not different between SCIDs and SHEDs.

Next, we compared the RNA expression levels of DSPP, DMP-1, BSP, OPN, and OCN in SCIDs and SHEDs. DSPP is secreted by odontoblasts throughout dentin formation, and it is cleaved into dentin sialoprotein and dentin phosphoprotein [21, 22]. It is considered a specific marker of odontogenic differentiation [22]. DMP1 is a noncollagenous protein expressed in mineralized tissues [23]. It is an early gene, expressed during the commitment of neural crest-derived cells into odontoblasts [24]. BSP is a major structural protein of the bone matrix, and OCN is the most abundant noncollagenous bone matrix protein. OPN is a major cell- and hydroxyapatite-binding protein synthesized by osteoblasts; it is involved in anchoring osteoclasts to the mineral of bone matrix, and it plays a critical role in bone remodeling [25, 26]. OPN is an essential factor in causing osteoporosis in postmenopausal women, because high OPN expression prevents osteogenesis; the counteraction of OPN may prove effective in activating osteoclasts [27]. Interestingly, our results showed that expression levels of DSPP, DMP-1, BSP, OPN, and OCN were not different between SCIDs and SHEDs.

In addition, compared to SHEDs, we found that SCIDs exhibited similar adipogenic differentiation potential, based on Oil red O staining and the expression of differentiation markers, including PPARG, CEBPA, LPL, and CD36. SCIDs and SHEDs also showed similar chondrogenic differentiation potential, based on Alcian blue staining and expression of differentiation markers, SOX9 and COL2. Taken together, our results indicated that SCIDs and SHEDs possessed similar cell proliferation and multidifferentiation potentials.

Previous studies have shown upregulation of various cytokines in inflamed pulp, including IL-1β, IL-2, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, TNF-α, and INF-γ [2830]. Root resorption in primary teeth and inflammatory propagation were both shown to be initiated and regulated by the secretion of stimulatory molecules, including cytokines and transcription factors. However, based on our real-time PCR results, we found that SCIDs and SHEDs expressed similar mRNA levels of IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α. ELISA results showed that SCIDs and SHEDs secreted similar amounts of IL-6 protein into the culture medium, but SCIDs secreted more TNF-α protein compared to SHEDs. TNF-α is involved in a wide spectrum of biological processes, including cell proliferation, differentiation, apoptosis, lipid metabolism, and coagulation. Several studies have reported that TNF-α promoted odontogenic/osteogenic differentiation in DPSCs [3133]. TNF-α activated the NF-κB pathway during osteogenic differentiation and increased mineralization; in addition, it upregulated the expression levels of bone morphogenetic protein 2, ALP, runt-related transcription factor 2, and collagen type I [33]. However, earlier reports had suggested that TNF-α was a negative regulator of osteoblast differentiation [3436] and that long-term treatment with TNF-α could inhibit tooth mineralization. It is possible that TNF-α has different short-term and long-term effects on MSCs and/or different effects at different developmental stages of MSCs; thus, the effect of TNF-α on SCIDs may be difficult to predict. These issues will require further study for elucidation.

Recently, it was controversial whether MSCs isolated from inflamed dental tissues would retain the regeneration potential observed in MSCs from normal dental tissues [48]. Yazid et al. reported that MSCs derived from inflamed pulp deciduous tissues were highly dysfunctional in MSC characteristics, stemness, and immunomodulatory properties [17]. In contrast, our results showed that there were no significant differences between SCIDs and SHEDs in their in vitro proliferation and multidifferentiation potentials. In the Yazid study, patient ages were similar in groups with healthy and inflamed deciduous pulp tissues [17]. However, in general, patients diagnosed with irreversible pulpitis in primary teeth are typically younger than those with exfoliated deciduous teeth. Therefore, in the present study, the mean age of the SHED group was significantly older than that of the SCID group. Previous studies have shown that there is an age-related decline in cell functions [3740]. Several reports have indicated that a reduction in proliferative ability was strongly correlated with increasing age. For example, DPSCs derived from younger individuals showed faster doubling times than those from senior individuals [39]. In addition, with increasing age, dental stem cells underwent a decline in their capacity to perform neurogenic differentiation but an increase in their capacity to perform osteogenic differentiation in vitro [40, 41]. Nevertheless, compared to DPSCs from young donors, aged DPSCs showed retarded pulp regeneration after autologous transplantation in vivo [42]. The aging microenvironment was demonstrated to have an inhibitory effect on adult stem cells [4144]. Indeed, conditioned medium derived from MSCs showed a decline, with increasing age, in its abilities to enhance proliferation, differentiation, and migration [41, 42, 44]. However, there is a lack of information about age-related changes in stem cells from deciduous teeth, particularly when the aging period of interest is relatively short, compared to age-related changes in stem cells from permanent teeth.

In conclusion, our study verified that SCIDs showed high proliferative capacity and osteogenic, adipogenic, and chondrogenic differentiation potential. There were no significant differences between SCIDs and SHEDs in their proliferation and multidifferentiation potentials in vitro. Our results suggested that SCIDs might represent a new, viable source of cells for MSC-mediated tissue regeneration applications.


MSCs:Mesenchymal stem cells
SHEDs:Stem cells from human exfoliated deciduous teeth
SCIDs:Stem cells from human inflamed pulp of deciduous teeth
DPSCs:Dental pulp stem cells
BMMSCs:Bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells
ALP:Alkaline phosphatase
GAPDH:Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase
BSP:Bone sialoprotein
DSPP:Dentin sialophosphoprotein
DMP-1:Dentin matrix protein 1
CD36:CD36 molecule
CEBPA:CCAAT/enhancer binding protein (C/EBP), alpha
LPL:Lipoprotein lipase
PPARG:Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma
SOX9:Sex determining region Y-box 9
COL2:COL2A1 collagen, type II, alpha 1
IL-1β:Interleukin 1β
IL-6:Interleukin 6
TNF-α:Tumor necrosis factor α
CD90 (THY-1):Thy-1 cell surface antigen
CD105 (ENG):Endoglin
CD146 (NCAM):Melanoma cell adhesion molecule.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.


This work was supported by Grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81271101 to Zhipeng Fan), the Beijing Natural Science Foundation (5132011 to Zhipeng Fan), the Program for New Century excellent Talents in University (NCET-12-0611 to Zhipeng Fan), the Subject Construction Funding Project in Capital Medical University School of Stomatology (13-09-07 to Dongmei Yang), and the High-level Talents of Beijing Health System (2013-3-035 to Zhipeng Fan).

Supplementary Materials

GAPDH was used as an internal control. BSP, OPN, OCN, DSPP and DMP-1 were osteo-/dentinogenic-related makers. CD36, LPL, PPARG and CEBPA were adipogenic-related markers. COL2 and SOX9 were markers of chondrogenic differentiation. IL1B, IL6 and TNFA were inflammatory cytokines.

  1. Supplementary Material


  1. S. Gronthos, M. Mankani, J. Brahim, P. G. Robey, and S. Shi, “Postnatal human dental pulp stem cells (DPSCs) in vitro and in vivo,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 97, no. 25, pp. 13625–13630, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. B.-M. Seo, “Investigation of multipotent postnatal stem cells from human periodontal ligament,” The Lancet, vol. 364, pp. 149–155, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. W. Sonoyama, Y. Liu, D. Fang et al., “Mesenchymal stem cell-mediated functional tooth regeneration in Swine,” PLoS ONE, vol. 1, no. 1, article e79, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. D. J. Alongi, T. Yamaza, Y. Song et al., “Stem/progenitor cells from inflamed human dental pulp retain tissue regeneration potential,” Regenerative Medicine, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 617–631, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. Z. Wang, J. Pan, J. T. Wright et al., “Putative stem cells in human dental pulp with irreversible pulpitis: an exploratory study,” Journal of Endodontics, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 820–825, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. L. O. Pereira, M. R. Rubini, J. R. Silva et al., “Comparison of stem cell properties of cells isolated from normal and inflamed dental pulps,” International Endodontic Journal, vol. 45, no. 12, pp. 1080–1090, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. J.-C. Park, J.-M. Kim, I.-H. Jung et al., “Isolation and characterization of human periodontal ligament (PDL) stem cells (PDLSCs) from the inflamed PDL tissue: in vitro and in vivo evaluations,” Journal of Clinical Periodontology, vol. 38, no. 8, pp. 721–731, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. J. Dokić, S. Tomić, S. Cerović, V. Todorović, R. Rudolf R, and M. Colić, “Characterization and immunosuppressive properties of mesenchymal stem cells from periapical lesions,” Journal of Clinical Periodontology, vol. 39, no. 9, pp. 807–816, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  9. J. Liao, M. Al Shahrani, M. Al-Habib, T. Tanaka, and G. T.-J. Huang, “Cells isolated from inflamed periapical tissue express mesenchymal stem cell markers and are highly osteogenic,” Journal of Endodontics, vol. 37, no. 9, pp. 1217–1224, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. M. Miura, S. Gronthos, M. Zhao et al., “SHED: stem cells from human exfoliated deciduous teeth,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 100, no. 10, pp. 5807–5812, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. A. Pivoriuūnas, A. Surovas, V. Borutinskaitë et al., “Proteomic analysis of stromal cells derived from the dental pulp of human exfoliated deciduous teeth,” Stem Cells and Development, vol. 19, no. 7, pp. 1081–1093, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  12. S. Nakamura, Y. Yamada, W. Katagiri, T. Sugito, K. Ito, and M. Ueda, “Stem cell proliferation pathways comparison between human exfoliated deciduous teeth and dental pulp stem cells by gene expression profile from promising dental pulp,” Journal of Endodontics, vol. 35, no. 11, pp. 1536–1542, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. B. M. Seo, W. Sonoyama, T. Yamaza et al., “SHED repair critical-size calvarial defects in mice,” Oral Diseases, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 428–434, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. Y. Zheng, Y. Liu, C. M. Zhang et al., “Stem cells from deciduous tooth repair mandibular defect in swine,” Journal of Dental Research, vol. 88, no. 3, pp. 249–254, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. V. T. Sakai, Z. Zhang, Z. Dong et al., “SHED differentiate into functional odontoblasts and endothelium,” Journal of Dental Research, vol. 89, no. 8, pp. 791–796, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. J. Wang, X. Wang, Z. Sun et al., “Stem cells from human-exfoliated deciduous teeth can differentiate into dopaminergic neuron-like cells,” Stem Cells and Development, vol. 19, no. 9, pp. 1375–1383, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. F. B. Yazid, N. Gnanasegaran, W. Kunasekaran, V. Govindasamy, and S. Musa, “Comparison of immunodulatory properties of dental pulp stem cells derived from healthy and inflamed teeth,” Clinical Oral Investigations. In press. View at: Google Scholar
  18. D. L. Deskins, D. Bastakoty, S. Saraswati, A. Shinar, G. E. Holt, and P. P. Younga, “Human mesenchymal stromal cells: identifying assays to predict potency for therapeutic selection,” Stem Cells Translational Medicine, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 151–158, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. Z. Fan, T. Yamaza, J. S. Lee et al., “BCOR regulates mesenchymal stem cell function by epigenetic mechanisms,” Nature Cell Biology, vol. 11, no. 8, pp. 1002–1009, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. S. Yu, J. Long, J. Yu et al., “Analysis of differentiation potentials and gene expression profiles of mesenchymal stem cells derived from periodontal ligament and wharton's jelly of the umbilical cord,” Cells Tissues Organs, vol. 197, no. 3, pp. 209–223, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. C. Bègue-Kirn, P. H. Krebsbach, J. D. Bartlett, and W. T. Butler, “Dentin sialoprotein, dentin phosphoprotein, enamelysin and ameloblastin: tooth-specific molecules that are distinctively expressed during murine dental differentiation,” European Journal of Oral Sciences, vol. 106, no. 5, pp. 963–970, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  22. M. MacDougall, D. Simmons, X. Luan, J. Nydegger, J. Feng, and T. T. Gu, “Dentin phosphoprotein and dentin sialoprotein are cleavage products expressed from a single transcript coded by a gene on human chromosome 4: dentin phosphoprotein DNA sequence determination,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 272, no. 2, pp. 835–842, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. A. George, B. Sabsay, P. A. L. Simonian, and A. Veis, “Characterization of a novel dentin matrix acidic phosphoprotein. Implications for induction of biomineralization,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 268, no. 17, pp. 12624–12630, 1993. View at: Google Scholar
  24. K. Narayanan, S. Gajjeraman, A. Ramachandran, J. Hao, and A. George, “Dentin matrix protein 1 regulates dentin sialophosphoprotein gene transcription during early odontoblast differentiation,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 281, no. 28, pp. 19064–19071, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. F. P. Reinholt, K. Hultenby, A. Oldberg, and D. Heinegard, “Osteopontin: a possible anchor of osteoclasts to bone,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 87, no. 12, pp. 4473–4475, 1990. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. S. Ohshima, H. Kobayashi, N. Yamaguchi et al., “Expression of osteopontin at sites of bone erosion in a murine experimental arthritis model of collagen-induced arthritis: Possible involvement of osteopontin in bone destruction in arthritis,” Arthritis and Rheumatism, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 1094–1101, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. H. Yoshitake, S. R. Rittling, D. T. Denhardt, and M. Noda, “Osteopontin-deficient mice are resistant to ovariectomy-induced bone resorption,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 96, no. 14, pp. 8156–8160, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. M. Elsalhy, F. Azizieh, and R. Raghupathy, “Cytokines as diagnostic markers of pulpal inflammation,” International Endodontic Journal, vol. 46, no. 6, pp. 573–580, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. A. C. O. Silva, M. R. Faria, A. Fontes, M. S. Campos, and B. N. Cavalcanti, “Interleukin-1 beta and interleukin-8 in healthy and inflamed dental pulps,” Journal of Applied Oral Science, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 527–532, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  30. T. Nakashima, Y. Kobayashi, S. Yamasaki et al., “Protein expression and functional difference of membrane-bound and soluble receptor activator of NF-κB ligand: modulation of the expression by osteotropic factors and cytokines,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 275, no. 3, pp. 768–775, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. F. W. G. Paula-Silva, A. Ghosh, L. A. B. Silva, and Y. L. Kapila, “TNF-α promotes an odontoblastic phenotype in dental pulp cells,” Journal of Dental Research, vol. 88, no. 4, pp. 339–344, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. X. Yang, S. Zhang, X. Pang, and M. Fan, “Pro-inflammatory cytokines induce odontogenic differentiation of dental pulp-derived stem cells,” Journal of Cellular Biochemistry, vol. 113, no. 2, pp. 669–677, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. X. Feng, G. Feng, J. Xing et al., “TNF-alpha triggers osteogenic differentiation of human dental pulp stem cells via the NF-kappaB signalling pathway,” Cell Biology International, vol. 37, no. 12, pp. 1267–1275, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  34. K.-S. Min, Y.-Y. Kwon, H.-J. Lee et al., “Effects of proinflammatory cytokines on the expression of mineralization markers and heme oxygenase-1 in human pulp cells,” Journal of Endodontics, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 39–43, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. S. Abbas, Y.-H. Zhang, J. C. Clohisy, and Y. Abu-Amer, “Tumor necrosis factor-α inhibits pre-osteoblast differentiation through its type-1 receptor,” Cytokine, vol. 22, no. 1-2, pp. 33–41, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. L. Gilbert, X. He, P. Farmer et al., “Inhibition of osteoblast differentiation by tumor necrosis factor-α,” Endocrinology, vol. 141, no. 11, pp. 3956–3964, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  37. J. Zhang, Y. An, L.-N. Gao, Y.-J. Zhang, Y. Jin, and F.-M. Chen, “The effect of aging on the pluripotential capacity and regenerative potential of human periodontal ligament stem cells,” Biomaterials, vol. 33, no. 29, pp. 6974–6986, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. E. Bressan, L. Ferroni, C. Gardin et al., “Donor age-related biological properties of human dental pulp stem cells change in nanostructured scaffolds,” PLoS ONE, vol. 7, no. 11, Article ID e49146, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. M. Kellner, M. M. Steindorff, J. F. Strempel, A. Winkel, M. P. Kühnel, and M. Stiesch, “Differences of isolated dental stem cells dependent on donor age and consequences for autologous tooth replacement,” Archives of Oral Biology, vol. 59, no. 6, pp. 559–567, 2014. View at: Google Scholar
  40. X. Feng, J. Xing, G. Feng et al., “Age-dependent impaired neurogenic differentiation capacity of dental stem cell is associated with Wnt/beta-catenin signaling,” Celluar and Molecular Neurobiology, vol. 33, no. 8, pp. 1023–1031, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  41. D. Ma, Z. Ma, X. Zhang et al., “Effect of age and extrinsic microenvironment on the proliferation and osteogenic differentiation of rat dental pulp stem cells in vitro,” Journal of Endodontics, vol. 35, no. 11, pp. 1546–1553, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. K. Iohara, M. Murakami, K. Nakata, and M. Nakashima, “Age-dependent decline in dental pulp regeneration after pulpectomy in dogs,” Experimental Gerontology, vol. 52, pp. 39–45, 2014. View at: Google Scholar
  43. J. Choi and S. Artandi, “Stem cell aging and aberrant differentiation within the niche,” Cell Stem Cell, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 6–8, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. W. Zheng, S. Wang, D. Ma, L. Tang, Y. Duan, and Y. Jin, “Loss of proliferation and differentiation capacity of aged human periodontal ligament stem cells and rejuvenation by exposure to the young extrinsic environment,” Tissue Engineering A, vol. 15, no. 9, pp. 2363–2371, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2014 Shi Yu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.
 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.