BioMed Research International

BioMed Research International / 2015 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2015 |Article ID 320280 |

Birgit Weyand, Meir Israelowitz, James Kramer, Christian Bodmer, Mariel Noehre, Sarah Strauss, Elmar Schmälzlin, Christoph Gille, Herbert P. von Schroeder, Kerstin Reimers, Peter M. Vogt, "Three-Dimensional Modelling inside a Differential Pressure Laminar Flow Bioreactor Filled with Porous Media", BioMed Research International, vol. 2015, Article ID 320280, 9 pages, 2015.

Three-Dimensional Modelling inside a Differential Pressure Laminar Flow Bioreactor Filled with Porous Media

Academic Editor: Ali I. Abdalla
Received21 Feb 2015
Accepted05 Jul 2015
Published02 Aug 2015


A three-dimensional computational fluid dynamics- (CFD-) model based on a differential pressure laminar flow bioreactor prototype was developed to further examine performance under changing culture conditions. Cell growth inside scaffolds was simulated by decreasing intrinsic permeability values and led to pressure build-up in the upper culture chamber. Pressure release by an integrated bypass system allowed continuation of culture. The specific shape of the bioreactor culture vessel supported a homogenous flow profile and mass flux at the scaffold level at various scaffold permeabilities. Experimental data showed an increase in oxygen concentration measured inside a collagen scaffold seeded with human mesenchymal stem cells when cultured in the perfusion bioreactor after 24 h compared to static culture in a Petri dish (dynamic: 11% O2 versus static: 3% O2). Computational fluid simulation can support design of bioreactor systems for tissue engineering application.

1. Introduction

Bioreactor designs for bone tissue engineering applications often use perfusion models where fluid shear stresses through porous scaffolds activate biological processes such as cell proliferation and differentiation [15]. The shear stresses acting on the cultivated cells depend not just on the geometry and internal structural shape of the scaffolds, but also on the whole reactor vessel design, the position of the scaffold within, and the way and mode of perfusion [57]. Most applications use cylindrical-shaped scaffolds made from various materials such as ceramic, polyester, collagen, or silk matrices, which can be perfused either through their circular or through their lateral surface area [713]. Uniform perfusion is desirable for sufficient nutrient and oxygen transport to cells seeded inside the scaffolds. Increase in cell number during tissue growth leads to changes in scaffold permeability and also changes in flow and pressure distribution [5, 14]. In addition to cell growth, morphological changes, cell migration, and continuous perfusion can lead to changes in matrix fiber arrangement and remodelling that also influence the physical properties of the internal scaffold [15].

Besides external forces such as shear stresses, pressure, and gravity, the concentration of oxygen is an important factor of the physiologic environment during bone growth and repair. Dissolved oxygen concentration has the unit mmol/L or mg/L, but, in the physiologic context, the unit is often expressed as % where 21% means that a solution is air-saturated, which corresponds to 6,7 mg/L oxygen at 37°C and 1013 hPa [16]. Low oxygen concentrations are found in the stem cell reservoir in the bone marrow (2–7%), in avascular tissues such as cartilage (1–6%), or at sites of infections or acute injury such as fractures (1%) [17, 18]. Higher oxygen concentrations (5–10%) are required during the mineralization process in bone formation and repair, when small vessels start to sprout into the cartilaginous ground substance or nonmineralized callus. The direct interaction between vascular endothelial cells and bone-forming osteoblasts leads to deposition of osteoid and begin of the mineralization process [19]. In cell culture experiments in vitro, a reduced oxygen tension has been accompanied by an increased proliferation rate and a decreased differentiation capacity of stem and osteoprogenitor cells compared to normoxic culture conditions [2026]. Therefore, it is of great importance to monitor oxygen concentration inside bioreactors and even more inside scaffolds during the cultivation process.

We have recently designed a differential pressure laminar flow bioreactor based on a two-dimensional CFD (computational fluid dynamics) model for flow and pressure control to support cell survival and tissue growth by prevention of high shear forces and pressure peaks [2729]. Biological testing revealed beneficial conditions for stem cell growth and differentiation into bone tissue when cultured inside the bioreactor system [15, 30]. A further system upgrade was achieved by implementation of an oxygen sensor system for real-time, noninvasive monitoring of oxygen concentration within a tissue-engineered scaffold during culture in the bioreactor [31]. The aim of the present study was to focus our simulation on the reactor vessel itself and apply a three-dimensional CFD model to our system and evaluate flow and pressure distribution and oxygen content during experimental conditions.

2. Materials and Methods

Star-CCM+ program (version 8.04) from CD-Adapco was used for three-dimensional flow simulation. CAD data set from the bioreactor model was imported and converted, and a polyhedral prism mesh with 1.2° million cells and 6.9° million faces was created by the program-innate surface wrapper. To describe the flow inside the bioreactor, Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes equations were applied for liquid media. The inlet of the bioreactor was set as velocity with  m/s which corresponds to a pump rate of 1 mL/min used experimentally, the outlet as pressure, and the flow as steady, segregated flow with water density. The culture medium was treated as incompressible Newtonian fluid with the viscosity of water at 37°C. Scaffold properties used for simulation are stated below. Convergence criterion was set at 0.001 for continuity, -velocity, -velocity, and -velocity. The number of iterations was set at 500.

2.1. Scaffold Properties

The scaffold was simulated with a constant porous medium model using hybrid LSQ (least squares) Green-Gauss model. Parameters for modelling flow through porous media are summarized in Table 1 which were derived from previous work [29] and were converted to units used by the Star-CCM+ program.

ScaffoldDarcian permeability [m2]Porous viscous resistance [kg/m3s]Porous inertial resistance [kg/m4]


For unit conversion, the porous viscous resistance [m−2] was multiplied by the viscosity of the fluid (water at 37°C, which is 6.915 10−4 Pas = 6.915 10−4 kgm−1s−2) to get the unit [kgm−3s−1]. The porous inertial resistance [m−1] was divided by 2 and multiplied with the fluid density (for water, which is 992.2 kgm−3) to convert to the unit [kgm−4].

The different permeabilities represent a collagen matrix (reported permeability in literature up to ) with decreasing permeability during cell growth [32, 33].

For experimental testing in the bioreactor, we used MatriDerm (MedSkin Solution Suwelack, Billerbeck, Germany), which is a collagen-elastin matrix with a dense inner fiber structure and porous sizes between 20 and 50 and up to 100 and 150°μm.

2.2. Model

The momentum equations considered for the porous medium are described by Batchelor [34]: where is the static pressure, is the stress tensor, is the product of density and gravitational constant vector ( is the density and is the gravitational constant), and are the gravitational body force and external body forces (e.g., that arise from interaction with the dispersed phase).

The stress tensor is given by where is the molecular viscosity, is the unit tensor, and the second term on the right hand side is the effect of volume dilation.

For 3D geometries, conservation equations are given by where

The porous media term is composed of two parts: Darcy’s, which contains the first part of the right-side equation, and a viscous loss term, which is defined by the second part of the right-side equation: where is the source term for the th () momentum equation, is the magnitude of the velocity, and and are prescribed matrices. This momentum sink contributes to the pressure gradient in the porous cell, creating a pressure drop that is proportional to the fluid velocity (or velocity squared) in the cell.

In Star-CCM+, the porous jump conditions are used to model a thin membrane that has known velocity (pressure drop) characteristics. It is essentially a 1D simplification of the porous media model available for cell zones.

The thin porous medium has a finite thickness over which the pressure change is defined as a combination of Darcy’s law and an additional inertial loss term: where is the laminar fluid viscosity, is the permeability of the medium, is the pressure-jump coefficient, is the velocity normal to the porous face, and is the thickness of the medium.

2.3. Mass Flux

The mass flux is the rate of mass flow per unit area [kgs−1m−2] and is given bywhere is the density of the fluid, is the area, and velocity of the flow (as a component of magnitude).

2.4. Bioreactor Cultivation and Oxygen Monitoring

For biological experiments, human adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells were derived from fat tissue donors undergoing abdominoplasty after informed consent and in accordance with the guidelines of the Ethical Committee of Hannover Medical School. The full procedure followed standard protocols and has been described elsewhere [35]. Mesenchymal stem cells were cultivated in a cell culture incubator at 37°C and 5% CO2 and expanded in standard culture medium (DMEM-F12 (PAA laboratories, US)), supplemented with 5% fetal calf serum, antibiotics, sodium pyruvate, and nonessential amino acids (all Biochrom, USA). Stem cells were continuously tested for multipotency and stem cell surface markers [36].

The bioreactor was equipped with a laser-based oxygen measurement system called “OPAL,” which measures oxygen-dependent phosphorescence lifetime of microbeads (50 μm diameter), and uses a two-frequency modulation technique to eliminate interference by background fluorescence [37]. The system, which actually is intended to be used with fluorescence microscopes, has been described in detail previously [3739]. In order to detect the signal of the spherical oxygen microsensors, the photomultiplier unit was linked to a camera objective and placed in front of a window, which had been integrated in the bioreactor wall (see Figure 1).

For experiments, cylindrical collagen scaffolds were prepared with phosphorescent microbeads which were placed centrally inside the scaffolds and fixated with 20 μL of fibrin glue. Scaffolds were seeded with 1.3 107 adipose mesenchymal stem cells of which 5% were glued together with the microbeads in the center of the scaffold, and the remaining 95% were injected randomly into the cylinder. Wetted collagen scaffolds had a diameter of 10 mm and a height of 15 mm. Cell-seeded scaffolds were then transferred inside glass Petri dishes with a diameter of 8 cm and a height of 3 cm and cultured statically in a standard incubator at 37°C and 5% CO2. For dynamic cultivation, scaffolds were placed inside the bioreactor and cultivated at 37°C under continuous perfusion with addition of HEPES buffer solution (PAA laboratories, US) to the culture medium in order to maintain a stable pH. At the end of experiments, scaffolds were fixed in formalin-based solution and processed for microscopy analysis (conventional staining, fluorescence staining, and scanning electron microscopy).

3. Results

The laminar flow bioreactor and the oxygen sensor system are being presented in Figure 1. Figure 1(a) shows a schematic view of the whole setup, Figure 1(b) shows the bioreactor during an experimental course, and Figure 1(c) demonstrates the scaffold holder device suitable for simultaneous cultivation of up to seven cylindrical scaffolds with a diameter of 10 mm. The lateral positioned bypass system, which can be seen in Figure 1(a) number 4, was designed to release pressure build-up and prevent high shear forces inside the scaffolds during cell growth inside the porous matrices. For CFD simulation, a mesh of the bioreactor was created with the surface wrapper and polyhedral volume mesher of the Star-CCM+ program which is presented in Figure 2; here the open bypass systems are marked by an arrow. For the closed bypass model, bypasses were blocked by an interface layer which was integrated in the mesh.

CFD simulations were performed for closed and open bypass systems and scaffolds with different permeability values representing different states of cell growth inside the scaffold as stated in Table 1. There was no convergence at a scaffold permeability of 5 10−13 and 5 10−12 when the bypasses in the bioreactor were closed. All other configuration variants showed a solution which converged.

Results of the CFD simulation are presented in Figures 36. Figure 3 shows the pressure distribution in the bioreactor system simulated with various scaffold permeability. With the bypass system of the bioreactor closed, the pressure difference between the upper and lower parts of the culture chamber separated by the scaffold increases with decreasing intrinsic scaffold permeability as seen in Figures 3(a)3(c). The “pressure drop” accounts for 6.5 Pa for a permeability of 5 10−11 and 63 Pa for a permeability of 5 10−12 and increases up to 360 Pa when permeability decreases to 5 10−13. Opening the bypass system results in pressure release, and pressure values in the upper and lower part of the culture chamber adjust to a pressure difference of about 3.3 Pa, as seen here in Figure 3(d) for the simulation with the lowest scaffold permeability 5 10−13.

Results of flow velocity analysis are shown in Figure 4 for different configurations. Uniform flow streamlines in the whole bioreactor vessel (Figures 4(a) and 4(b)) and at the level of the scaffold holder (Figures 4(c) and 4(d)) are seen for both the closed bypass and open bypass operations at various scaffold permeability. The flow velocity at scaffold level obtained by CFD modelling was in the range of 10−10 down to  m/s for closed or open bypass configuration and represents global values and not velocities in single pores of the scaffold.

Figure 5 shows the results of mass flux (kg m−2 s−1) simulation in the bioreactor for closed (a) and open (b) bypass configuration. The results show a homogenous distribution and were in the range between 0.05 and 0.15 kg m−2 s−1 for the various permeability values used for the porous media in the model.

Figure 6 demonstrates a scanning electron microscopy picture of the collagen scaffold cultured for 10 days in the bioreactor with adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells, which can be seen with their cellular extensions inside the dense fibrous network (a + b). Mesenchymal stem cells stayed viable inside the collagen scaffold and aligned in direction of the perfusion stream as seen in fluorescence microscopy in Figures 6(c) and 6(d).

Oxygen measurement centrally inside the cell-seeded collagen scaffolds demonstrated a significant difference between statically cultured scaffolds in a Petri dish compared to dynamically cultured scaffolds in the bioreactor as demonstrated in Figure 7. Scaffolds in the bioreactor had a mean central oxygen concentration of 11% after 24 h of perfusion culture, whereas in statically cultured scaffolds an oxygen concentration of 3% was measured (mean results of 8 experiments).

4. Discussion

In recent years, computational fluid dynamics has gained more and more interest in the development and optimization of systems for biotechnology such as bioreactors [5, 11, 40, 41]. Our perfusion bioreactor model had been originally developed based on 2D CFD fluid modelling [5] and the resulting prototype [30] was now further analyzed by means of 3D simulation. Star-CCM+ software (version 8.06) from CD-Adapco computed porous media model for single-phase flow and multiphase flow using the superficial velocity porous formulation. The program calculated the superficial phase or mixture velocities based on the volumetric flow rate in the porous region. As stated above, our intention was not to describe the flow through the porous scaffold itself, which would require a different approach, but to examine the flow and pressure characteristics of the bioreactor during operational mode in more detail. Three-dimensional flow characterization of the differential pressure laminar flow bioreactor was feasible for idealized porous media.

Results from our simulation underline the importance of pressure control in the system during cell growth inside the porous scaffold causing decrease in permeability. In our current operating prototype, the pressure control system is set up that a change in differential pressure of 1 mbar = 100 Pa activates the opening of the bypasses [30]. The specific shape of the cultivation vessel and scaffold holder of the bioreactor promotes uniform flow streamlines and prevents turbulences at scaffold levels in a range of settings simulating various states of scaffold architecture and cell and extracellular matrix growth. Observation during bioreactor culture of the collagen scaffold showed changes of the internal structure with alignment of collagen fibers and cells along the flow path-lines during the first ten days of culture and disintegration of the internal scaffold architecture when culture was prolonged for up to four weeks [42]. For simulation of flow in the porous scaffold itself during cell growth, a stable internal architecture would be essential which is, for example, given by ceramic materials or nondissoluble polymers.

Our oxygen measurement data from the interior of the cell-seeded scaffold suggest an improvement of oxygen supply towards the cells during perfusion culture in the bioreactor. Further work is necessary in order to study oxygen distribution inside scaffolds during long-term perfusion cultures and determine its influence on cell growth and differentiation inside tissue-engineered constructs.

5. Conclusion

A three-dimensional computational model is presented to characterize flow and pressure distribution inside a perfusion bioreactor prototype. Simulation results underscore the importance of pressure control during changes in porous media permeability caused during cell growth and changes in internal scaffold architecture, which was solved by an internal bypass system for pressure release. Oxygen measurement data suggest an improved oxygen supply for the tissue-engineered constructs in the bioreactor during perfusion culture compared to static cultivation in a Petri dish.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Authors’ Contribution

Birgit Weyand and Meir Israelowitz contributed equally to this work.


The authors thank Professor C. Kasper, BOKU, Vienna, for MatriDerm scaffold supplies, J. Zwicker, Zerspanung, and Metallbau Hannover for help with bioreactor modification, and G. Preiss, A. Lazarides, and S. Braun for technical support. This work was supported by a grant of Hannover Impuls Excellence Initiative, a State doctorate grant for female scientists for Birgit Weyand through Hannover Medical School and a medical student doctoral grant through the “Struc Med” program of Hannover Biomedical Research School for Mariel Noehre. In addition, this project received funding from the investment bank of the German federal state of Brandenburg, Grant no. 80149436 (FeLas3D).


  1. R. J. McCoy and F. J. O'Brien, “Influence of shear stress in perfusion bioreactor cultures for the development of three-dimensional bone tissue constructs: a review,” Tissue Engineering Part B: Reviews, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 587–601, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. D. Li, T. Tang, J. Lu, and K. Dai, “Effects of flow shear stress and mass transport on the construction of a large-scale tissue-engineered bone in a perfusion bioreactor,” Tissue Engineering—Part A, vol. 15, no. 10, pp. 2773–2783, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. J. Rauh, F. Milan, K.-P. Günther, and M. Stiehler, “Bioreactor systems for bone tissue engineering,” Tissue Engineering Part B: Reviews, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 263–280, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. H. Singh and D. W. Hutmacher, “Bioreactor studies and computational fluid dynamics,” Advances in Biochemical Engineering/Biotechnology, vol. 112, pp. 231–249, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. B. Weyand, M. Israelowitz, H. P. von Schroeder, and P. M. Vogt, “Fluid dynamics in bioreactor design: considerations for the theoretical and practical approach,” Advances in Biochemical Engineering/Biotechnology, vol. 112, pp. 251–268, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. B. Bilgen and G. A. Barabino, “Location of scaffolds in bioreactors modulates the hydrodynamic environment experienced by engineered tissues,” Biotechnology and Bioengineering, vol. 98, no. 1, pp. 282–294, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. F. Zhao, R. Chella, and T. Ma, “Effects of shear stress on 3-D human mesenchymal stem cell construct development in a perfusion bioreactor system: experiments and hydrodynamic modeling,” Biotechnology and Bioengineering, vol. 96, no. 3, pp. 584–595, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. G. N. Bancroft, V. I. Sikavitsas, and A. G. Mikos, “Design of a flow perfusion bioreactor system for bone tissue-engineering applications,” Tissue Engineering, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 549–554, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. L. Bjerre, C. E. Bünger, M. Kassem, and T. Mygind, “Flow perfusion culture of human mesenchymal stem cells on silicate-substituted tricalcium phosphate scaffolds,” Biomaterials, vol. 29, no. 17, pp. 2616–2627, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. T. Dvir, N. Benishti, M. Shachar, and S. Cohen, “A novel perfusion bioreactor providing a homogenous milieu for tissue regeneration,” Tissue Engineering, vol. 12, no. 10, pp. 2843–2852, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. D. W. Hutmacher and H. Singh, “Computational fluid dynamics for improved bioreactor design and 3D culture,” Trends in Biotechnology, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 166–172, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. C. Sandino, J. A. Planell, and D. Lacroix, “A finite element study of mechanical stimuli in scaffolds for bone tissue engineering,” Journal of Biomechanics, vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 1005–1014, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. A. B. Yeatts and J. P. Fisher, “Bone tissue engineering bioreactors: dynamic culture and the influence of shear stress,” Bone, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 171–181, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. P. Vossenberg, G. A. Higuera, G. van Straten, C. A. van Blitterswijk, and A. J. B. van Boxtel, “Darcian permeability constant as indicator for shear stresses in regular scaffold systems for tissue engineering,” Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 499–507, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. B. Weyand, K. Reimers, and P. M. Vogt, “Influences of extracellular matrix properties and flow shear stresses on stem cell shape in a three-dimensional dynamic environment,” in Proceedings of the International Federation for Medical and Biological Engineering Conference, A. El Haj, D. Bader, and R. Magrajevic, Eds., vol. 30, pp. 47–50, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  16. B. B. Benson and D. Krause, “The concentration and isotopic fractionation of gases dissolved in freshwater in equilibrium with the atmosphere. 1. Oxygen,” Limnology and Oceanography, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 662–671, 1980. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. R. N. Pittman, “Oxygen gradients in the microcirculation,” Acta Physiologica, vol. 202, no. 3, pp. 311–322, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. J. Malda, T. J. Klein, and Z. Upton, “The roles of hypoxia in the in vitro engineering of tissues,” Tissue Engineering, vol. 13, no. 9, pp. 2153–2162, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. B. Weyand and H. P. von Schroeder, “Bone challenges for the hand surgeon: from basic bone biology to future clinical applications,” Clinics in Plastic Surgery, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 537–547, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. W. L. Grayson, F. Zhao, R. Izadpanah, B. Bunnell, and T. Ma, “Effects of hypoxia on human mesenchymal stem cell expansion and plasticity in 3D constructs,” Journal of Cellular Physiology, vol. 207, no. 2, pp. 331–339, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. O. S. Grinakovskaya, E. R. Andreeva, L. B. Buravkova, Y. V. Rylova, and G. Y. Kosovsky, “Low level of O2 inhibits commitment of cultured mesenchymal stromal precursor cells from the adipose tissue in response to osteogenic stimuli,” Bulletin of Experimental Biology and Medicine, vol. 147, no. 6, pp. 760–763, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. R. Gruber, B. Kandler, H. Agis, M. B. Fischer, and G. Watzek, “Bone cell responsiveness to growth and differentiation factors under hypoxia in vitro,” International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 417–426, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  23. J. He, D. C. Genetos, C. E. Yellowley, and J. Kent Leach, “Oxygen tension differentially influences osteogenic differentiation of human adipose stem cells in 2D and 3D cultures,” Journal of Cellular Biochemistry, vol. 110, no. 1, pp. 87–96, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. Q. Lin, Y.-J. Lee, and Z. Yun, “Differentiation arrest by hypoxia,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 281, no. 41, pp. 30678–30683, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. P. Malladi, Y. Xu, M. Chiou, A. J. Giaccia, and M. T. Longaker, “Effect of reduced oxygen tension on chondrogenesis and osteogenesis in adipose-derived mesenchymal cells,” The American Journal of Physiology—Cell Physiology, vol. 290, no. 4, pp. C1139–C1146, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. L. F. Raheja, D. C. Genetos, and C. E. Yellowley, “The effect of oxygen tension on the long-term osteogenic differentiation and MMP/TIMP expression of human mesenchymal stem cells,” Cells Tissues Organs, vol. 191, no. 3, pp. 175–184, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. M. Israelowitz, S. Rizvi, C. Holmes, C. Gille, and H. P. von Schroder, “Laminar Flow Reactor,” patent, 2015. View at: Google Scholar
  28. M. Israelowitz, S. Rizvi, C. Holmes, C. Gille, and H. P. von Schroder, “Apparatus for culture and growth of cells to a three-dimensional tissue,” patent, 2015. View at: Google Scholar
  29. M. Israelowitz, B. Weyand, S. Rizvi, P. M. Vogt, and H. P. von Schroeder, “Development of a laminar flow bioreactor by computational fluid dynamics,” Journal of Healthcare Engineering, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 455–476, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. B. Weyand, C. Kasper, M. Israelowitz et al., “A differential pressure laminar flow reactor supports osteogenic differentiation and extracellular matrix formation from adipose mesenchymal stem cells in a macroporous ceramic scaffold,” BioResearch Open Access, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 145–156, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. B. Weyand, E. Schmälzlin, M. Stolz et al., “Application of a laser-based sensor for real-time oxygen monitoring in three-dimensional tissue cultures,” Journal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine, vol. 6, supplement s1, article 343, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  32. F. Pennella, G. Cerino, D. Massai et al., “A survey of methods for the evaluation of tissue engineering scaffold permeability,” Annals of Biomedical Engineering, vol. 41, no. 10, pp. 2027–2041, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. E. J. Lee and L. E. Niklason, “A novel flow bioreactor for in vitro microvascularization,” Tissue Engineering Part C: Methods, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 1191–1200, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. G. K. Batchelor, An Introduction to Fluid Dynamics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2002.
  35. J. W. Kuhbier, B. Weyand, C. Radtke, P. M. Vogt, C. Kasper, and K. Reimers, “Isolation, characterization, differentiation, and application of adipose-derived stem cells,” Advances in Biochemical Engineering/Biotechnology, vol. 123, pp. 55–105, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. M. Dominici, K. Le Blanc, I. Mueller et al., “Minimal criteria for defining multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells. The International Society for Cellular Therapy position statement,” Cytotherapy, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 315–317, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. E. Schmälzlin, J. T. van Dongen, I. Klimant et al., “An optical multifrequency phase-modulation method using microbeads for measuring intracellular oxygen concentrations in plants,” Biophysical Journal, vol. 89, no. 2, pp. 1339–1345, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. E. Schmälzlin, L. Friedmann, E. Horn, and R. Zantl, “Spatially-resolved oxygen measurements in biological samples,” Metrology, pp. 70–73, 2015. View at: Google Scholar
  39. S. Elmar, F. Lena, H. Elias, and Z. Roman, “Ortsaufgelöste Sauerstoffmessungen in biologischen Proben,” BioPhotonik, vol. 2, pp. 34–37, 2014. View at: Google Scholar
  40. F. Consolo, G. B. Fiore, S. Truscello et al., “A computational model for the optimization of transport phenomena in a rotating hollow-fiber bioreactor for artificial liver,” Tissue Engineering Part C: Methods, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 41–55, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. L. A. Hidalgo-Bastida, S. Thirunavukkarasu, S. Griffiths, S. H. Cartmell, and S. Naire, “Modeling and design of optimal flow perfusion bioreactors for tissue engineering applications,” Biotechnology and Bioengineering, vol. 109, no. 4, pp. 1095–1099, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. B. Weyand, M. Nöhre, E. Schmälzlin et al., “Noninvasive oxygen monitoring in three-dimensional tissue cultures under static and dynamic culture conditions,” BioResearch Open Access, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 266–277, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2015 Birgit Weyand et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles