Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
BioMed Research International
Volume 2017 (2017), Article ID 6895730, 13 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/6895730
Research Article

Extracellular Signal-Regulated Kinase 5 is Required for Low-Concentration H2O2-Induced Angiogenesis of Human Umbilical Vein Endothelial Cells

1Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China
2Medicine School of Chinese PLA, Beijing 100853, China
3Department of General Surgery, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100730, China
4Institute of Basic Medicine, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China
5Medicine School of Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China

Correspondence should be addressed to Yan Han; moc.361@53368002731 and Weidong Han; moc.oohay@96wsrdwnah

Received 23 November 2016; Revised 22 February 2017; Accepted 9 March 2017; Published 30 April 2017

Academic Editor: Arianna Scuteri

Copyright © 2017 Shan Jiang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Background. The aim of this study was to assess the effects of low concentrations of H2O2 on angiogenesis of human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) in vitro and explore the underlying mechanisms. Methods. HUVECs were cultured and stimulated with different concentrations of H2O2. Flow cytometric analysis was used to select an optimal concentration of H2O2 for the following experiments. Cell proliferation, migration, and tubule formation were evaluated by Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8) assays, scratch wound assays, and Matrigel tubule formation assays, respectively. For gain and loss of function studies, constitutively active MEK5 (CA-MEK5) and ERK5 shRNA lentiviruses were used to activate or knock down extracellular signal-regulated kinase 5 (ERK5). Results. We found that low concentrations of H2O2 promoted HUVECs proliferation, migration, and tubule formation. ERK5 in HUVECs was significantly activated by H2O2. Enhanced ERK5 activity significantly amplified the proangiogenic effects of H2O2; in contrast, ERK5 knock-down abrogated the effects of H2O2. Conclusions. Our results confirmed that low concentrations of H2O2 promoted HUVECs angiogenesis in vitro, and ERK5 is an essential mediator of this process. Therefore, ERK5 may be a potential therapeutic target for promoting angiogenesis and improving graft survival.

1. Introduction

Tissue transplantation is commonly used in plastic and reconstructive surgery. Timely and effective revascularization is important in ensuring graft survival, and angiogenesis plays an essential role in this process. Angiogenesis, the formation of new blood vessels from existing vasculature, involves many cellular components and signaling pathways, including reactive oxygen species (ROS), which play an important role in this process [1].

ROS, including hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), superoxide radicals (O2−), and hydroxyl radicals (OH), are important signaling molecules that regulate multiple biological responses, including angiogenesis [2]. ROS, H2O2 in particular, have biphasic effects on angiogenesis; ROS at physiological levels mediate endothelial cell proliferation, migration, tubular formation, and enhanced angiogenesis, but ROS at pathological levels result in detrimental effects, including cell apoptosis, death, and impaired angiogenesis [35]. Low concentrations of ROS induce angiogenesis, but the signaling cascades linked to this outcome are unclear.

Among various ROS downstream signaling molecules, mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs) have a crucial role [6]. The MAPK signaling pathway is highly conserved and involved in many different cellular functions, such as cell survival, proliferation, migration, and differentiation. To date, four different MAPK family members have been identified: p38, c-Jun-amino-terminal kinase (JUN), extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 (ERK1/2), and ERK5 [7]. Among them, ERK5, which is also known as big MAP kinase 1 (BMK1), is the most recently identified family member [8]. ERK5 can be activated to a large extent by H2O2, suggesting that, compared with other MAPK family members, ERK5 is a redox-sensitive kinase [9]. Targeted deletion of ERK5 in mice revealed its crucial functions in angiogenesis [10].

Since both H2O2 and ERK5 play important roles in angiogenesis and ERK5 is redox-sensitive, we hypothesized that low-concentration H2O2 promotes endothelial cell angiogenesis through the ERK5 pathway. To verify this hypothesis, we investigated the role of ERK5 in H2O2-induced human umbilical vein endothelial cell (HUVECs) proliferation, migration, and tubule formation.

In this study, we found that ERK5 activation by H2O2 was critical for its proangiogenic function; downregulation of p-ERK5 by shERK5 inhibited H2O2 proangiogenic activity in vitro, whereas upregulation of p-ERK5 by CA-MEK5 facilitated H2O2 proangiogenic action. The concentration of H2O2 (50 μmol/L) used in our study was in the range of that reached under pathophysiological conditions in vivo (from 0.2 nmol/L in red blood cells to 200 μmol/L in wound fluid) [11, 12]; therefore, the findings of the present study may be applicable to clinical settings.

2. Methods

2.1. Cell Culture

HUVECs were acquired from China Infrastructure of Cell Line Resources (Beijing, China). Cells were grown in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM, HyClone, USA) containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, HyClone, USA) and 1% penicillin-streptomycin (Gibco, USA). The cell cultures were incubated at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO2. Cells were used for experiments at 80–90% confluency after 2-3 days of culture. In some cases, 5 U/ml catalase (Sigma, USA) was added 5 min before H2O2 was administered.

2.2. Gain and Loss of Function Studies

For gain of function studies, a constitutively active MEK5 (CA-MEK5) lentivirus was used to activate ERK5. A nonspecific green fluorescent protein (GFP) lentivirus with the same multiplicity of infection (MOI, 20) was used as a negative control. For loss of function studies, ERK5 shRNA (shERK5) lentivirus was used to reduce ERK5 expression in endothelial cells. A nonsilencing shRNA lentivirus with the same MOI was used as a negative control (control siRNA). Cells were seeded in 6-well plates, cultured overnight, and then incubated with lentivirus for 48 h for infection. All the plasmids and lentiviruses used were constructed by the Shanghai Obio Technology Company (Shanghai, China).

2.3. Detection of Apoptosis

After a 30 min incubation with different concentrations of H2O2, cells were labeled with phycoerythrin- (PE-) conjugated annexin V and 7-amino-actinomycin (7-AAD) (BD Pharmingen, USA) following the kit instructions. Approximately 5,000 cells were counted from each sample using flow cytometry (BD Biosciences, USA), and early apoptotic cells were defined as annexin V positive/7-AAD negative.

2.4. Western Blot Analysis

Cells were lysed in RIPA buffer (50 mmol/L Tris-HCl, 150 mmol/L NaCl, 1% NP-40, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, and 0.1% SDS) containing a protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche, USA). The protein concentration was measured using a BCA kit, and 30 μg of protein per sample was used for polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and then transferred to nitrocellulose membranes. The membranes were blocked with fat-free milk or 5% BSA for 1 h at room temperature and then incubated with various antibodies: ERK5 (#3372, Cell Signaling Technology, 1 : 1000), phosphorylated-ERK5 (#07-507, Millipore, 1 : 1000), MEF2C (#5030T, Cell Signaling Technology, 1 : 1000), phosphorylated-MEF2C (sc-377535, Santa Cruz, 1 : 200), ERK1/2 (#9102, Cell Signaling Technology, 1 : 1000), p-ERK1/2 (#9101, Cell Signaling Technology, 1 : 1000), and β-actin (ab8226, Abcam, 1 : 1000) overnight at 4°C. After the membranes were washed with TBST, they were incubated with HRP-linked secondary antibodies: goat anti-rabbit IgG (#7074, Cell Signaling Technology, 1 : 2000) or goat anti-mouse IgG (ab6728, Abcam, 1 : 2000) for 1 h at room temperature. The density of the protein bands was determined by ImageJ software. Densitometric values of the ERK5, MEF2C, and ERK1/2 bands were normalized to that of -actin. Phosphorylated protein levels were normalized to the respective total protein levels.

2.5. Detection of Cell Proliferation

Cell proliferation was assessed using a Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8, Dojindo, Japan) assay. Following the manufacturer’s instructions, HUVECs were seeded in 96-well plates at a density of 1 × 103 cells per well. After the cells were cultured in a standard environment for 24 h, they were analyzed using CCK-8 assays. Following treatment with PBS, H2O2 (50 μmol/L), or catalase (5 U/ml) and H2O2 (50 μmol/L) for 30 min, the culture media were changed to normal medium. Then, 10 μl CCK-8 was added, and cells were further cultured for 2.5 h. The optical density (OD) at 450 nm was measured using a microplate reader (Beijing Xinfeng Mechanical and Electrical Technology Co., China).

2.6. Cell Migration Assay

Cell migration was assessed using scratch wound assays. HUVECs were seeded in 6-well plates at a density of 1 × 106 cells per well (confluence) and cultured overnight. Following treatment with PBS, H2O2 (50 μmol/L), or catalase (5 U/ml) and H2O2 (50 μmol/L) for 30 min, a scratch was made by a sterile 200 μl pipette tip in the center of each well and washed twice with PBS. The wounded HUVECs monolayers were then incubated with medium containing 2% FBS for 12 h or 24 h. Photographs were taken at 0 h and 12 h or 24 h at fixed locations along the scratch with an Olympus microscope, and the closure of the wound area was quantified using ImageJ software.

2.7. Tubule Formation Assay

In vitro tubule formation of HUVECs was assayed on Matrigel (Corning, USA). Briefly, Matrigel (400 μl per well) was coated on 6-well plates and incubated at 37°C for 30 min to form a solid gel. Cells were pretreated with PBS, H2O2 (50 μmol/L), or catalase (5 U/ml) and H2O2 (50 μmol/L) for 30 min and then trypsinized, collected, and seeded onto Matrigel-coated wells (1 × 104 cells per well) in complete medium (DMEM containing 10% FBS and 1% penicillin-streptomycin) and cultured for 4 to 8 h. Tubule formation was observed with an Olympus microscope and analyzed by measuring branch length and counting tubule number with ImageJ software.

2.8. Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA)

Cells were seeded in 60 mm tissue culture dishes at a density of 1 × 106 cells per well and cultured overnight in normal medium. Following treatment with PBS or 50 μmol/L H2O2 for 30 min, the medium was changed to fresh normal medium. After 12 h or 24 h culture, the cell supernatant was collected, and the concentration of human vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) protein was determined by a human VEGF ELISA kit (R&D Systems, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

2.9. Statistical Analysis

All data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation (SD). Comparison among multiple groups was performed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by the SNK post hoc test. The results were considered statistically significant when the value was less than 0.05 (). Each experiment included triplicate measurements for each condition tested, and the experiment was repeated at least three times.

3. Results

3.1. Effects of Different Concentrations of H2O2 on HUVEC Viability

To determine the optimal concentration of H2O2, we assessed the effects of five different concentrations. The results showed that 0–50 μmol/L H2O2 did not induce significant apoptosis of HUVECs. However, 100 μmol/L H2O2 increased the apoptotic rate of the cells, and 200 μmol/L H2O2 induced significant cell apoptosis (Figure 1). Based on these results and proangiogenic preexperiment results that proangiogenic effect was more significant with 50 umol/L H2O2 (versus control group) than with 25 umol/L H2O2, we used 50 μmol/L H2O2 in the following experiments.

Figure 1: Effects of different concentrations of H2O2 on HUVEC viability. (a–e) Scatter plots of flow cytometric results with annexin V (horizontal axis) and 7-AAD (vertical axis). Cells were labeled with annexin V and 7-AAD after a 30 min incubation with different concentrations of H2O2. The conditions were as follows: (a) 0 μmol/L H2O2 (control), (b) 25 μmol/L H2O2, (c) 50 μmol/L H2O2, (d) 100 μmol/L H2O2, and (e) 200 μmol/L H2O2. Early apoptotic cells were defined as annexin V positive/7-AAD negative. (f) Quantitative analysis of cell apoptosis with different concentrations of H2O2 (mean ± SD of six separate experiments, versus control, and one-way ANOVA followed by SNK post hoc test).
3.2. Low Levels of H2O2 Promote HUVEC Proliferation, Migration, and Tubule Formation

Stimulation of endothelial cell proliferation is essential for angiogenesis. As shown in Figure 2(a), treatment with 50 μmol/L H2O2 significantly increased HUVECs proliferation, and this effect was completely abrogated by catalase, an enzyme that eliminates H2O2. Additionally, cell migration is an important step in angiogenesis. Scratch wound assays were performed; the area recovered represents endothelial cell migration (Figure 2(b)). Control cells recovered ()% after 24 h. Cells treated with 50 μmol/L H2O2 increased migration to 100%. The cells treated with 50 μmol/L H2O2 and catalase (5 U/ml) did not differ from the control cells [()%, Figure 2(c)]. Furthermore, tubule formation is one of the hallmarks of angiogenesis, along with cell proliferation and migration. To assess the effect of low-concentration H2O2 on endothelial cell angiogenesis, we performed a Matrigel tubule formation assay (Figure 2(d)). After the cells were plated on Matrigel, control cells formed few capillary-like tubes, while cells treated with 50 μmol/L H2O2 formed more capillary-like tube structures (branch length: 2.9-fold increase; tubule number: 1.5-fold increase). As observed previously, cells treated with 50 μmol/L H2O2 and 5 U/ml catalase did not differ from those of the control. Overall, low-concentration H2O2 promoted HUVECs angiogenesis; however, catalase eliminated all H2O2 proangiogenic effects.

Figure 2: Low concentrations of H2O2 promote HUVEC proliferation, migration, and tubule formation. (a) Cell proliferation assessed by CCK-8 assays. HUVECs were treated with PBS, H2O2 (50 μmol/L), or catalase (5 U/ml) and H2O2 (50 μmol/L) for 30 min. Then, 10 μl CCK-8 was added. The OD at 450 nm was measured 2.5 h later (mean ± SD of six separate experiments, versus control, and one-way ANOVA followed by SNK post hoc test). (b, c) Cell migration assessed by scratch wound assays. HUVECs were seeded at confluence and cultured overnight. Following treatment with PBS, H2O2 (50 μmol/L), or catalase (5 U/ml) and H2O2 (50 μmol/L) for 30 min, a scratch was made. The wounded HUVECs monolayers were then incubated with medium containing 2% FBS for 24 h. Photographs were taken at 0 h and 24 h at fixed locations along the scratch, and the closure of the wound area was quantified (mean ± SD of six separate experiments, versus control, and one-way ANOVA followed by SNK post hoc test). (d, e, f) In vitro tubule formation. Tubule formation was assayed on Matrigel. Cells were pretreated with PBS, H2O2 (50 μmol/L), or catalase (5 U/ml) and H2O2 (50 μmol/L) for 30 min and then seeded onto Matrigel-coated wells in normal medium and cultured for 4 to 8 h. Tubule formation was analyzed by measuring branch length and counting tubule number (mean ± SD of six separate experiments, versus control, and one-way ANOVA followed by SNK post hoc test).
3.3. Low Concentrations of H2O2 Induce ERK5 Activation in HUVECs

We examined whether ERK5 was activated by low-concentration H2O2 in HUVECs. Endogenous ERK5 activity was measured by assessing phosphorylation of ERK5 and its substrate, MEF2C. H2O2 treatment of the cells resulted in activation of ERK5 without changes in total ERK5. Pretreatment of the cells with 5 U/ml catalase inhibited ERK5 activation by H2O2. ERK1/2 and p-ERK1/2 protein levels did not change significantly among the experimental groups (Figure 3).

Figure 3: Low-concentration H2O2 induced ERK5 activation in HUVECs. (a) ERK5, p-ERK5, MEF2C, p-MEF2C, ERK1/2, and p-ERK1/2 protein levels were measured by western blotting. Following treatment with PBS, H2O2 (50 μmol/L), or catalase (5 U/ml) and H2O2 (50 μmol/L) for 30 min, cells were lysed, and the lysates were resolved by 10% or 6% SDS-PAGE. (b, c, d, e, f, g) Densitometric quantification of ERK5, p-ERK5, MEF2C, p-MEF2C, ERK1/2, and p-ERK1/2 expression (mean ± SD of three separate experiments, versus control, and one-way ANOVA followed by SNK post hoc test).
3.4. ERK5 Mediates Low-Concentration H2O2-Induced HUVEC Angiogenesis In Vitro

To determine whether ERK5 was essential for H2O2-induced angiogenesis, we generated HUVECs populations with CA-MEK5 expression or Erk5 knock-down and their respective control populations. Lentiviral transfection efficiency was greater than 90%, as assessed by GFP expression (Figure 4(a)), and therefore, cell sorting or selection was not necessary. As shown in Figures 4(b)4(f), transfection with CA-MEK5 strongly activated ERK5, and the ERK5 knock-down efficiency by a specific shRNA was 80%. No significant change of ERK1/2 and p-ERK1/2 protein levels was seen in all cell populations (Figures 4(g)4(h)). The resulting cells were tested in the following in vitro angiogenesis assays.

Figure 4: Construction of high or low p-ERK5 HUVEC populations. (a) Images of lentivirus-transfected HUVECs. (b) ERK5, p-ERK5, MEF2C, p-MEF2C, ERK1/2, and p-ERK1/2 protein levels were determined by western blotting. Different cell populations were lysed, and the lysates were resolved by 10% or 6% SDS-PAGE. (c, d, e, f, g, h) Densitometric quantification of ERK5, p-ERK5, MEF2C, p-MEF2C, ERK1/2, and p-ERK1/2 expression (mean ± SD of three separate experiments, , and one-way ANOVA followed by SNK post hoc test).

In HUVECs transfected with CA-MEK5, cell proliferation (Figure 5(a)), migration (Figures 5(b) and 5(c)), and tubule formation (Figures 5(d), 5(e), and 5(f)) by H2O2 were significantly amplified. In contrast, ERK5 knock-down abrogated the proangiogenic effects of low concentrations of H2O2. Furthermore, VEGF secretion stimulated by H2O2 was also significantly amplified in HUVECs transfected with CA-MEK5, while VEGF level decreased in HUVECs transfected with ERK5 shRNA (Figure 5(g)), These results suggest that low concentrations of H2O2 induced HUVEC angiogenesis through the ERK5 signaling pathway.

Figure 5: Activated ERK5 is essential for low-concentration H2O2-induced HUVEC angiogenesis. (a) Cell proliferation assessed by CCK-8 assays. Cells were treated with PBS or H2O2 (50 μmol/L) for 30 min. Then, 10 μl CCK-8 was added. The OD value at 450 nm was measured 2.5 h later (mean ± SD of six separate experiments, , and one-way ANOVA followed by SNK post hoc test). (b, c) Cell migration assessed by scratch wound assays. Cells were seeded at confluence and cultured overnight. Following treatment with PBS or H2O2 (50 μmol/L) for 30 min, a scratch was made. The wounded cell monolayers were then incubated with medium containing 2% FBS for 12 h. Photographs were taken at 0 h and 12 h at fixed locations along the scratch, and closure of the wound was quantified (mean ± SD of six separate experiments, , and one-way ANOVA followed by SNK post hoc test). (d, e, f) In vitro tubule formation. Tubule formation was assayed on Matrigel. Cells were pretreated with PBS or H2O2 (50 μmol/L) for 30 min and then seeded onto Matrigel-coated wells in normal medium and cultured for 4 to 8 h. Tubule formation was analyzed by measuring branch length and counting tubule number (mean ± SD of six separate experiments, , and one-way ANOVA followed by SNK post hoc test). (g) VEGF secretion assessed by ELISA. Cells were treated with PBS or H2O2 (50 μmol/L) for 30 min; then the medium was changed to fresh normal medium. After 12 h or 24 h culture, the cell supernatant was collected, and the concentration of VEGF was determined by a human VEGF ELISA kit (mean ± SD of six separate experiments, , and one-way ANOVA followed by SNK post hoc test).

4. Discussion

Angiogenesis is a complex, multifaceted process that requires the coordinated proliferation, migration, and ultimate differentiation of endothelial cells as well as other cells to form a lumen-containing vessel capable of allowing blood flow. This study is the first to reveal that ERK5 is specifically required for low-concentration H2O2-induced angiogenesis in HUVECs. H2O2 (50 μmol/L) promoted HUVEC proliferation, migration, and tubule formation (Figure 2); furthermore, gain/loss of function studies revealed that ERK5 mediated these processes (Figure 5). A series of studies of transgenic ERK5 mice showed that ERK5 plays a critical role in endothelial cell function. ERK5-null mice died of cardiovascular defects and impaired angiogenesis on embryonic day 10.5 [1315]. Additionally, the conditional ERK5 knock-out adult mouse died within 2-3 weeks due to endothelial failure [16]. Furthermore, ERK5 was shown to be essential in protecting endothelial cells from apoptosis induced by serum deprivation and tumor necrosis factor [17]. The present study further supports the key role of ERK5 in endothelial cell function.

ROS, especially H2O2, have been reported to have biphasic effects on angiogenesis—at physiological levels, they promote angiogenesis, but excess levels impair angiogenesis. The tolerance of cells to H2O2 depends on the cell type and cellular context [1820]. As shown by our results, 50 μmol/L H2O2 was not toxic to HUVECs and did not cause significant apoptosis. However, 200 μmol/L H2O2 induced significant cell apoptosis (Figure 1). High levels of H2O2 may trigger other signaling pathways that lead to cell apoptosis or death, and ERK5 activation could not overcome these oxidative insults.

Previous studies have shown that a wide variety of mitogens, including stress stimuli such as H2O2, can activate the ERK5 signaling pathway, as well as the other MAP kinases. The present findings that H2O2 stimulated significant activation of ERK5 (Figure 3) are consistent with a previous report showing that H2O2 activated ERK5 in vascular smooth muscle cells [21]. In addition, H2O2-induced activation of ERK5 in cultured fibroblasts was also observed [22]. Therefore, activation of ERK5 by H2O2 may be common in many cell types. The intracellular signaling mechanisms that lead to ERK5 activation have been investigated. A specific ERK5 upstream kinase, MEK5, and c-Src tyrosine kinase have both been shown to mediate ERK5 activation in response to oxidative stress. However, whether low concentrations of H2O2 activate ERK5 through the same pathway requires further investigation.

The expression of ERK5 in different tissues appears to be ubiquitous. Among several tissue-specific ERK5-knock-out mouse models, the endothelial ERK5-knock-out mouse showed an abnormal phenotype, indicating that ERK5 is critical for endothelial cell physiology [23]. ERK5 gain and loss of function experiments showed that ERK5 is required for low-concentration H2O2-induced angiogenesis.

shRNA-mediated knock-down of ERK5 or overexpression of CA-MEK5 significantly affected H2O2-mediated HUVECs proliferation. These findings are consistent with previous studies showing that ERK5 plays an important role in regulating cell cycle entry [24, 25]. The role of ERK5 in regulating cell proliferation remains unclear. Although previous studies have shown that proliferation of hematopoietic cells mediated by granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) [26], proliferation of vascular smooth muscle cells mediated by platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) [27], and proliferation of neural stem/progenitor cells mediated by epidermal growth factor (EGF) [28] are all ERK5-dependent, many other studies using cells from Erk5−/− and Mek5−/− mice have shown that ERK5 and MEK5 are not required for cell cycle progression [16, 29]. Notably, Roberts et al. [30] found that ERK5 is dispensable for cellular proliferation in primary human microvascular endothelial cells seeded on a gelatin matrix. These contrasting results indicate that the effect of ERK5 on cell proliferation may depend on the stimuli, the cell type, and even the cellular context [31].

The finding that ERK5 activation also promoted endothelial cell migration suggests that ERK5 may be particularly important in the initiation of angiogenesis. Our results are consistent with those of previous reports [3234]. In contrast, Spiering et al. [35] found that enhanced ERK5 signaling strongly inhibits endothelial cell migration and results in substantial morphological changes due to decreased focal contact turnover. Another recent report implicated ERK5 in Kruppel-like transcription factor (KLF2)/p21-activated kinase 1- (PAK1-) mediated inhibition of cell migration [36]. The explanation for these different findings is not clear. Various sources of cells and culture conditions may in part be responsible for this discrepancy.

Activation of ERK5 has previously been shown to regulate myoblast differentiation [37] by controlling the promyogenic actions of insulin-like growth factor 2 (IGF-2) [38]. Together with our results showing that ERK5 also mediates HUVECs tubule formation, these findings indicate that ERK5 regulates the differentiation of multiple cell types.

VEGF is a potent proangiogenic factor and activates ERK5 in both human and mouse endothelial cells [16]. However, whether ERK5 affects VEGF expression is unclear. A recent study indicated that the ERK5 pathway alters circulating VEGF level [39]. Our findings that 50 μmol/L H2O2 stimulation significantly elevated VEGF secretion in cells transfected with CA-MEK5 and VEGF level decreased in ERK5 knock-down cells (Figure 5(g)) add further support to this statement and our conclusion.

Based on the results of the present study and several published studies, we hypothesize that ERK5 may be essential in the initial sprouting stages until the final differentiation stages of angiogenesis.

Low concentrations of H2O2 stimulate angiogenesis, indicating that pharmacologically regulating cellular ROS (H2O2 in particular) levels rationally may be an angiogenic strategy.

Furthermore, elucidating the in-depth mechanisms underlying H2O2-induced angiogenesis would help develop novel treatment strategies for promoting revascularization of grafts and improving their survival. The finding that ERK5 activity regulates low-concentration H2O2-induced angiogenesis suggests that ERK5 is a potential target for therapies that modulate graft survival. Many drugs have been developed to promote angiogenesis and improve graft survival after tissue transplantation. However, most of these drugs target growth factors (e.g., VEGF; fibroblast growth factor, FGF), endothelial-specific receptor tyrosine kinases, and other extracellular molecules [40]. Drugs that target intracellular signaling pathways, which are important for endothelial cell growth, migration, and differentiation, are very rare. The major reason may be that these pathways are critical in both endothelial cells and other types of cells. Notably, specific knock-down or knock-out of ERK5 in mice in several different cell types, such as cardiomyocytes, neurons, and mammary epithelial cells, all resulted in normal phenotypes without any obvious adverse effects. The lifespan of the aforementioned genetically modified mice was the same as that of their control littermates [23]. Therefore, endothelial cells may be the primary cell type affected by the loss of ERK5. Based on the above findings, pharmacological activators targeting the ERK5 pathway in vivo would predominantly affect endothelial cells, especially during angiogenesis, with little effect on other types of cells [41]. Additionally, it will be important in the future to identify the ERK5 substrates that mediate the proangiogenic effects of low concentrations of H2O2 in endothelial cells.

5. Conclusions

Here, we demonstrated a novel mechanism of H2O2-induced angiogenesis in HUVECs. We showed that low concentrations of H2O2 activated ERK5 in the HUVECs. Enhanced activity of ERK5 amplified the proangiogenic effects of H2O2. In contrast, reduced activity of ERK5 abolished the effects of H2O2. However, further experiments are needed to clarify the mechanisms involved. Nevertheless, we believe that the present study provides helpful insights into the role of ERK5 in angiogenesis and thus provides a theoretical basis for developing new treatment strategies to promote revascularization of grafts and improve their survival.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

This research project was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China Grant 81272123.

References

  1. A. Kurzyk, “Angiogenesis—possibilities, problems and perspectives,” Postepy Biochemii, vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 25–34, 2015. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. E. Panieri and M. M. Santoro, “ROS signaling and redox biology in endothelial cells,” Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, vol. 72, no. 17, pp. 3281–3303, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. J. Oshikawa, S.-J. Kim, E. Furuta et al., “Novel role of p66shc in ROS-dependent VEGF signaling and angiogenesis in endothelial cells,” American Journal of Physiology—Heart and Circulatory Physiology, vol. 302, no. 3, pp. H724–H732, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. N. García-Quintans, C. Sánchez-Ramos, A. Tierrez et al., “Control of endothelial function and angiogenesis by PGC-1α relies on ROS control of vascular stability,” Free Radical Biology and Medicine, vol. 75, no. 1, p. S5, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. G. D. Kim, J. Oh, H.-J. Park, K. Bae, and S. K. Lee, “Magnolol inhibits angiogenesis by regulating ROS-mediated apoptosis and the PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway in mES/EB-derived endothelial-like cells,” International Journal of Oncology, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 600–610, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. Y. Son, Y. K. Cheong, N. H. Kim, H. T. Chung, D. G. Kang, and H. O. Pae, “Mitogen-activated protein kinases and reactive oxygen species: how can ROS activate MAPK pathways?” Journal of Signal Transduction, vol. 2011, Article ID 792639, 6 pages, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  7. Y. Sun, W. Z. Liu, T. Liu, X. Feng, N. Yang, and H. F. Zhou, “Signaling pathway of MAPK/ERK in cell proliferation, differentiation, migration, senescence and apoptosis,” Journal of Receptors and Signal Transduction, vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 600–604, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  8. X. Wang and C. Tournier, “Regulation of cellular functions by the ERK5 signalling pathway,” Cellular Signalling, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 753–760, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. G. Ulrich-Merzenich, H. Zeitler, D. Panek, D. Bokemeyer, and H. Vetter, “Vitamin C promotes human endothelial cell growth via the ERK-signaling pathway,” European Journal of Nutrition, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 87–94, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. G. N. Nithianandarajah-Jones, B. Wilm, C. E. P. Goldring, J. Müller, and M. J. Cross, “The role of ERK5 in endothelial cell function,” Biochemical Society Transactions, vol. 42, no. 6, pp. 1584–1589, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. C. Giulivi, P. Hochstein, and K. J. A. Davies, “Hydrogen peroxide production by red blood cells,” Free Radical Biology and Medicine, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 123–129, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. S. Roy, S. Khanna, K. Nallu, T. K. Hunt, and C. K. Sen, “Dermal wound healing is subject to redox control,” Molecular Therapy, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 211–220, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. C. P. Regan, W. Li, D. M. Boucher, S. Spatz, M. S. Su, and K. Kuida, “Erk5 null mice display multiple extraembryonic vascular and embryonic cardiovascular defects,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 99, no. 14, pp. 9248–9253, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. S. J. Sohn, B. K. Sarvis, D. Cado, and A. Winoto, “ERK5 MAPK regulates embryonic angiogenesis and acts as a hypoxia-sensitive repressor of vascular endothelial growth factor expression,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 277, no. 45, pp. 43344–43351, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. L. Yan, J. Carr, P. R. Ashby, V. Murry-Tait, C. Thompson, and J. S. C. Arthur, “Knockout of ERK5 causes multiple defects in placental and embryonic development,” BMC Developmental Biology, vol. 3, p. 11, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. M. Hayashi, S.-W. Kim, K. Imanaka-Yoshida et al., “Targeted deletion of BMK1/ERK5 in adult mice perturbs vascular integrity and leads to endothelial failure,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 113, no. 8, pp. 1138–1148, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. X. Pi, C. Yan, and B. C. Berk, “Big mitogen-activated protein kinase (BMK1)/ERK5 protects endothelial cells from apoptosis,” Circulation Research, vol. 94, no. 3, pp. 362–369, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. R. Chis, P. Sharma, N. Bousette et al., “α-crystallin B prevents apoptosis after H2O2 exposure in mouse neonatal cardiomyocytes,” American Journal of Physiology—Heart and Circulatory Physiology, vol. 303, no. 8, pp. H967–H978, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. E. De Marinis, M. Fiocchetti, F. Acconcia, P. Ascenzi, and M. Marino, “Neuroglobin upregulation induced by 17β-estradiol sequesters cytocrome c in the mitochondria preventing H2O2-induced apoptosis of neuroblastoma cells,” Cell Death and Disease, vol. 4, no. 2, p. e508, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. Y. Shimizug, R. Miyakura, and Y. Otsuka, “Nuclear receptor subfamily 4, group A, member 1 inhibits extrinsic apoptosis and reduces caspase-8 activity in H2O2-induced human HUC-F2 fibroblasts,” Redox Report, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 81–88, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. J.-I. Abe, M. Kusuhara, R. J. Ulevitch, B. C. Berk, and J.-D. Lee, “Big mitogen-activated protein kinase 1 (BMK1) is a redox-sensitive kinase,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 271, no. 28, pp. 16586–16590, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. J.-I. Abe, M. Takahashi, M. Ishida, J.-D. Lee, and B. C. Berk, “c-Src is required for oxidative stress-mediated activation of big mitogen-activated protein kinase 1 (BMK1),” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 272, no. 33, pp. 20389–20394, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. M. Hayashi and J.-D. Lee, “Role of the BMK1/ERK5 signaling pathway: lessons from knockout mice,” Journal of Molecular Medicine, vol. 82, no. 12, pp. 800–808, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. V. K. Lai, M. Ashraf, S. Jiang, and K. H. Haider, “MicroRNA-143 is a critical regulator of cell cycle activity in stem cells with co-overexpression of Akt and angiopoietin-1 via transcriptional regulation of Erk5/cyclin D1 signaling,” Cell Cycle, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 767–777, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. J. Wang, Q. Li, C. Wang et al., “Knock-down of CIAPIN1 sensitizes K562 chronic myeloid leukemia cells to imatinib by regulation of cell cycle and apoptosis-associated members via NF-κB and ERK5 signaling pathway,” Biochemical Pharmacology, vol. 99, pp. 132–145, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. F. Dong, J. S. Gutkind, and A. C. Larner, “Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor induces Erk5 activation, which is differentially regulated by protein-tyrosine kinases and protein kinase C: regulation of cell proliferation and survival,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 276, no. 14, pp. 10811–10816, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. G. Sharma and M. L. Goalstone, “Regulation of ERK5 by insulin and angiotensin-II in vascular smooth muscle cells,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 354, no. 4, pp. 1078–1083, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. T. Li, W. Wang, Y.-W. Pan, L. Xu, and Z. Xia, “A hydroxylated metabolite of flame-retardant PBDE-47 decreases the survival, proliferation, and neuronal differentiation of primary cultured adult neural stem cells and interferes with signaling of ERK5 map kinase and neurotrophin 3,” Toxicological Sciences, vol. 134, no. 1, pp. 111–124, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. X. Wang, A. J. Merritt, J. Seyfried et al., “Targeted deletion of mek5 causes early embryonic death and defects in the extracellular signal-regulated kinase 5/myocyte enhancer factor 2 cell survival pathway,” Molecular and Cellular Biology, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 336–345, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. O. L. Roberts, K. Holmes, J. Müller, D. A. E. Cross, and M. J. Cross, “ERK5 is required for VEGF-mediated survival and tubular morphogenesis of primary human microvascular endothelial cells,” Journal of Cell Science, vol. 123, no. 18, pp. 3189–3200, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. N. Gomez, T. Erazo, and J. M. Lizcano, “ERK5 and cell proliferation: nuclear localization is what matters,” Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology, vol. 4, p. 105, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  32. T. Li, Y. W. Pan, W. Wang et al., “Targeted deletion of the ERK5 MAP kinase impairs neuronal differentiation, migration, and survival during adult neurogenesis in the olfactory bulb,” PLoS ONE, vol. 8, no. 4, Article ID e61948, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. Y. Zuo, Y. Wu, B. Wehrli, S. Chakrabarti, and C. Chakraborty, “Modulation of ERK5 is a novel mechanism by which Cdc42 regulates migration of breast cancer cells,” Journal of Cellular Biochemistry, vol. 116, no. 1, pp. 124–132, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. Y. Huang, J. Yao, B. Zhu, J. Zhang, and T. Sun, “Mitogen-activated protein kinase 7 promotes cell proliferation, migration and invasion in SOSP-M human osteosarcoma cell line,” Tumori Journal, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  35. D. Spiering, M. Schmolke, N. Ohnesorge et al., “MEK5/ERK5 signaling modulates endothelial cell migration and focal contact turnover,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 284, no. 37, pp. 24972–24980, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. R. K. Komaravolu, C. Adam, J.-R. A. J. Moonen, M. C. Harmsen, M. Goebeler, and M. Schmidt, “Erk5 inhibits endothelialmigration via KLF2-dependent down-regulation of PAK1,” Cardiovascular Research, vol. 105, no. 1, pp. 86–95, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. D. Dinev, B. W. M. Jordan, B. Neufeld et al., “Extracellular signal regulated kinase 5 (ERK5) is required for the differentiation of muscle cells,” EMBO Reports, vol. 2, no. 9, pp. 829–834, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. E. J. Carter, R. A. Cosgrove, I. Gonzalez et al., “MEK5 and ERK5 are mediators of the pro-myogenic actions of IGF-2,” Journal of Cell Science, vol. 122, no. 17, pp. 3104–3112, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. S. H. Choi, D. Ruggiero, R. Sorice et al., “Six novel loci associated with circulating vegf levels identified by a meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies,” PLoS Genetics, vol. 12, no. 2, Article ID e1005874, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. R. Kerbel and J. Folkman, “Clinical translation of angiogenesis inhibitors,” Nature Reviews Cancer, vol. 2, no. 10, pp. 727–739, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. M. Hayashi, C. Fearns, B. Eliceiri, Y. Yang, and J.-D. Lee, “Big mitogen-activated protein kinase 1/extracellular signal-regulated kinase 5 signaling pathway is essential for tumor-associated angiogenesis,” Cancer Research, vol. 65, no. 17, pp. 7699–7706, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus