BioMed Research International

BioMed Research International / 2019 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2019 |Article ID 1575468 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/1575468

Zhi-yao Zhang, Yan-chen Li, Chuan-ying Geng, Hui-juan Wang, Wen-ming Chen, "Potential Relationship between Clinical Significance and Serum Exosomal miRNAs in Patients with Multiple Myeloma", BioMed Research International, vol. 2019, Article ID 1575468, 8 pages, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/1575468

Potential Relationship between Clinical Significance and Serum Exosomal miRNAs in Patients with Multiple Myeloma

Academic Editor: Junya Kuroda
Received08 Oct 2019
Accepted24 Oct 2019
Published14 Dec 2019

Abstract

This study evaluated the potential relationship between exosomal miRNAs and clinical symptoms in patients with multiple myeloma (MM). Forty-eight newly diagnosed myeloma patients and sixteen normal donors were enrolled in the study. The results showed that the relative expression levels of let-7c-5p, let-7d-5p, miR-140-3p, miR-185-5p, and miR-425-5p in the exosomes of MM patients were significantly lower than those of healthy controls. Furthermore, there were significant differences in the clinical characteristics of myeloma, such as kidney damage, while the expression levels of the same miRNA in exosomes and serum are not correlated. The expression of exosomal miRNA is related to the expression levels of clinical feature-related factors, such as creatinine, β2-microglobulin, β-CTX, and IL-6 in serum. Establishing this relationship could contribute to understanding the pathogenesis of MM.

1. Introduction

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a malignant tumor characterized by the expansion and proliferation of abnormal monoclonal plasma cells. The clinical features of MM mainly involve bone destruction, renal damage, anemia, and immune changes, which are usually attributed to the excessive production of monoclonal immunoglobulins from tumor cells [1].

miRNAs are a small class of noncoding RNA molecules that inactivate genes by degrading or translating specific proteins [2]. miRNAs are involved in a variety of health issues and abnormal metabolic reactions such as cell proliferation, tumor invasion, angiogenesis, apoptosis, and cancer immunity. Peripheral miRNAs have been extensively studied using a noninvasive method to predict a variety of malignancies due to the simplicity and reproducibility of sample collection. miRNA has been reported to perform well in the diagnosis and treatment of multiple myeloma since it is a potential predictor of MM patients’ sensitivity and resistance to myeloma-targeted drugs [3].

Exosomes are small membrane vesicle structures derived from various body fluids, such as plasma and urine, which contain a variety of information factors, including mRNA and miRNA, and small molecular proteins. Exosomal miRNA is relatively stable since exosomes can block RNase degradation due to the vesicle structure to protect genetic factors inside [4, 5]. Studies have shown that exosomal miRNA can be used as a diagnostic factor for a variety of malignancies including MM [6, 7]. The role of exosomal miRNAs in MM has also become a highly researched topic.

The aim of this study was to explore the differential expression of serum exosomal miRNAs in multiple myeloma (MM) patients and healthy control (HC) individuals as well as their relevance to the clinical symptoms of MM to explore its underlying mechanisms. In addition, serum miRNAs, which may reflect different aspects from exosome, may also suggest microenvironmental changes. Considering the complexity and high cost of the extraction of exosomal miRNA, whether the detection of exosome miRNA could be replaced by serum miRNA is also a problem that needs to be explored in this study.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Patient Samples

Forty-eight newly diagnosed myeloma patients from Beijing Chao-yang Hospital from April 2018 to October 2018 were enrolled in the study. All patients met the diagnostic criteria for multiple myeloma by IMWG. Myeloma patients and healthy donors were not exposed to any known cytotoxic treatment at the time of sample collection. Both myeloma patients and healthy donors signed informed consent forms.

2.2. Sample Preparation

Peripheral blood (2 ml) from each subject was collected in EDTA-treated tubes and stored at 4°C for no more than 1 hour. Peripheral blood was centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 15 min and then stored at −80°C until use.

2.3. Isolation of Exosomes and Extraction/Purification of Exosomal RNAs

The extraction and identification of exosomes and the extraction of RNA from exosomes and serum have been detailed in our previous studies [8]. ExoQuick Exosome Precipitation Solution (System Biosciences, Mountain View, CA, USA) was used to separate exosomes from serum. Twenty-five fmol synthetic C. elegans miRNA (Cel-miR-39, Ambion, Austin, TX, USA) was added to each sample as an internal control [9]. The miRNeasy Micro Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) was used to extract exosome samples. During the extraction and purification of RNA, the extraction step was strictly based on the protocol. The concentration and purity of RNA was detected by NanoDrop (NanoDrop Technologies, Wilmington, DE, USA).

2.4. Western Blotting Analysis

Separation of exosomes was identified by TS101-W in Western blot analysis. Separated exosome pellets from serum were treated with RIPA lysis buffer. The serum exosomal preparation was incubated with rabbit polyclonal anti-human TS101 IgG, followed by goat anti-rabbit horseradish peroxidase (System Biosciences).

2.5. Microarray Profiling

130 ng of the total RNA in each sample was enrolled in this study and hybridized for 16 h at 45°C on GeneChip following fragmentation. GeneChips were washed and stained in the Affymetrix Fluidics Station 450 and then scanned by Affymetrix® GeneChip Command Console installed on GeneChip® Scanner 3000 7G.

2.6. Identification of Differentially Expressed miRNAs

Data were analyzed with Robust Multichip Analysis (RMA) algorithm and values presented are log2 RMA signal intensity. and fold change >1.5 were considered as differential expression genes. The data had been transferred to GEO (GSE124489).

2.7. Isolation of Serum RNA

According to the manufacturer’s protocol, miRNeasy Serum/Plasma Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) was used to extract the total RNA. Twenty-five fmol of synthetic Cel-miR-39 (Ambion) was then spiked into the mixture. RNA extraction was performed following the manufacturer’s protocol. NanoDrop was used to measure RNA concentration and purity.

2.8. Measurement of Serum Exosomal miRNA Levels and Serum Circulating miRNA Levels

Serum exosomal miRNA levels and serum circulating miRNA levels were examined by real-time quantitative PCR. Preamplification was performed after the reverse transcription of 10 ng of the total RNA with a TaqMan miRNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Applied Biosystems, Carlsbad, CA, USA) with a miRNA specific stem loop primer (TaqMan miRNA Assay Kit; Applied Biosystems). Target miRNAs were selected based on previous microarray studies (GSE124489). According to the TaqMan miRNA Assay Protocol, amplification was performed using a 7500 real-time PCR system (Applied Biosystems), and the results were analyzed using RQ Manager software (Applied Biosystems). Amplification results were tested by threshold cycle (Ct) value, and the value of each sample was calculated after the PCR was repeated twice. The spiked Cel-miR-39 was used as an internal control. The relative gene expression values of the target miRNA were normalized to Cel-miR-39 and calculated using the 2-ΔΔCT method [10, 11].

2.9. Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA)

Secretion of IL-6, IL-6R, VEGF, 25-OH-VD, BAP, and β-CTX was assessed in peripheral blood plasma using ELISA quantification kits (IL-6 and IL-6R from Diaclone Biotechnology Ltd., France; VEGF and β-CTX from PHIDA Biotechnology Ltd., China; 25-OH-VD and BAP from IDS Biotechnology Ltd., UK). The assay was performed according to the protocol provided by the manufacturer.

2.10. Statistical Analysis

miRNA values are described as the mean ± SD. Differences between the two groups were analyzed by the Mann–Whitney U test, and Dunn’s comparative test was used as a posttest. Spearman assessed the correlation (r) of miRNA expression between serum exosomes and circulating miRNAs. All data were statistically analyzed by 24.0 SPSS (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Statistical significance was considered positive when the value was <5%.

3. Results

3.1. Selected miRNA Profiling Based on Previous Investigation and Exosomes Verified by Electron Microscope and Western Blotting

miRNA profiling results, as shown in Table 1, were analyzed based on the results of the microarray, where let-7c-5p, let-7d-5p, miR-140-3p, miR-185-3p, and miR-425-5p were significantly decreased compared with those of healthy controls (Figure 1(a)). Exosomes with a diameter of approximately 50–60 nm were observed by electron microscope (Figure 1(b)). TS101 was used to identify serum exosomes. We test the expression of TSG101 in isolated exosomes derived from the patient serum (Figure 1(c)).


MicroRNA valueRegulationFC

hsa-miR-47410.0011101Down−1.335895
hsa-miR-185-5p0.0016654Down−2.822401
hsa-mir-60900.0027411Down−1.383277
hsa-let-7d-5p0.0045661Down−2.445867
hsa-miR-45050.0080223Down−1.421201
hsa-miR-19b-3p0.008502Down−1.478023
hsa-let-7c-5p0.0101621Down−1.993793
hsa-miR-425-5p0.0101974Down−1.464822
hsa-miR-6849-5p0.0104978Down−1.34703
hsa-miR-3162-5p0.011158Down−1.300645
hsa-miR-6891-5p0.0116116Down−1.452478
hsa-miR-140-3p0.0127439Down−1.359699
hsa-miR-4632-5p0.0131308Down−1.455522
hsa-miR-103a-3p0.0146007Down−1.997548
hsa-let-7i-5p0.0149937Down−1.387171
hsa-miR-6749-5p0.0166741Down−1.559853
hsa-miR-885-3p0.0177255Down−1.3652
hsa-miR-6750-5p0.0198816Down−1.54725
hsa-miR-937-5p0.0199458Down−1.450515
hsa-miR-20a-5p0.020742Down−1.65547
hsa-miR-6824-5p0.0208769Down−1.489712
hsa-miR-361-5p0.0210404Down−1.361168
hsa-miR-1233-5p0.0248246Down−1.36092
hsa-miR-1909-3p0.0279793Down−1.42102
hsa-miR-451a0.0282091Down−1.641756
hsa-miR-328-5p0.0292033Down−1.645904
hsa-miR-6775-5p0.0306503Down−1.51946
hsa-miR-31410.0314553Down−1.403586
hsa-miR-1343-5p0.0317415Down−1.419553
hsa-miR-503-5p0.0342952Down−1.352801
hsa-miR-44590.0346482Down−1.356296
hsa-miR-6743-5p0.0347592Down−1.449548
hsa-miR-44290.036453Down−1.416416
hsa-miR-4701-3p0.0387719Down−1.390077
hsa-miR-47060.0404707Down−1.330192
hsa-miR-12460.0430674Down−2.145079
hsa-miR-4433-3p0.0464502Down−1.303152
hsa-mir-42810.0481501Down−1.309318
hsa-miR-5189-3p0.0019957Up3.319253
hsa-miR-45320.003398Up4.3523215
hsa-miR-1273g-3p0.0095161Up2.0281869
hsa-miR-2115-5p0.0215373Up2.0663002
hsa-miR-36650.0420994Up1.7028116

3.2. miRNA Expression in Patients with Different Clinical Features of MM

We further analyzed the expression profile of miRNA and the clinical features of myeloma patients. First, we tested the expression levels of exosomes and serum miRNAs in 48 newly diagnosed myeloma patients. The results showed that exosomal miRNA decreased at different levels while, on the contrary, serum miRNAs expression increased (Figure 2). Among them, the expression levels of let-7d-5p, miR-140-3p, and miR-425-5p were significantly decreased in exosomes compared with those of healthy controls (, , and , respectively), while the expression levels of let-7c-5p, miR-140-3p, and miR-425-5p were increased in serum (, , and , respectively). Correlation analysis showed no significant correlation between exosome and serum let-7c-5p, let-7d-5p, miR-140-3p, miR-185-5p, and miR-425-5p expression levels (; ; ; ; , respectively) (Table 2). Second, in the analysis of miRNAs with clinical symptoms, exosomes and miRNAs showed no significance in sex, age, heavy/light chain, and DS stage of the patients (Figure 3, Table 3). The expression levels of let-7d-5p and miR-425a-5p were significantly lower in ISS stage III and stage II compared with stage I. Compared with patients without kidney injury, the expressions of let-7c-5p, let-7d-5p, miR-140-3p, miR-185-5p, and miR-425-5p were decreased in patients with kidney damage. The cohort with high IL-6 levels showed increased expression of let-7c-5p, miR-140-3p, miR-185-5p, and miR-425-5p. These results indicate that the decline in exosomal miRNA expression may be associated with the development of clinical symptoms of myeloma and the progression of the disease.


miRNAsr value

Serum and exosomal let-7c-5p0.0660.725
Serum and exosomal let-7d-5p−0.1530.360
Serum and exosomal miR-140-3p0.2390.160
Serum and exosomal miR-185-5p−0.0090.955
Serum and exosomal miR-425-5p−0.0090.957

r” indicates the correlation coefficient between serum exosomal and circulating microRNAs.

CharacteristicsN (%)let-7c-5plet-7d-5pmiR-140-3pmiR-185-5pmiR-425-5p
(n = 48)Mean ± SDMean ± SDMean ± SDMean ± SDMean ± SD

Age0.4870.6160.7560.3210.435
≥6515 (31%)1.32 ± 0.911.22 ± 1.111.09 ± 1.041.56 ± 2.011.94 ± 1.11
<6533 (69%)1.12 ± 0.841.06 ± 0.991.08 ± 0.960.98 ± 0.911.69 ± 0.58

Sex0.4560.6050.1690.9560.404
Male22 (46%)1.32 ± 1.011.23 ± 1.220.86 ± 0.911.34 ± 1.730.67 ± 0.67
Female26 (54%)1.06 ± 0.711.00 ± 0.821.15 ± 1.020.99 ± 0.920.86 ± 0.86

Heavy chain0.4790.5050.2660.5010.101
No expression15 (31%)1.02 ± 0.621.29 ± 0.671.03 ± 0.660.81 ± 0.720.59 ± 0.67
IgG16 (34%)1.27 ± 0.871.29 ± 1.231.04 ± 0.681.11 ± 0.880.66 ± 0.39
IgA13 (27%)1.37 ± 0.951.16 ± 1.121.34 ± 1.381.81 ± 2.211.26 ± 1.14
IgD4 (8%)0.83 ± 0.480.83 ± 0.470.50 ± 0.450.64 ± 0.860.46 ± 0.64

Light chain0.8050.8460.3660.5680.595
Nonsecretion1 (2%)
Κ27 (56%)1.10 ± 0.720.97 ± 0.680.96 ± 0.680.96 ± 0.750.75 ± 0.75
Λ20 (42%)1.24 ± 1.021.26 ± 0.1.360.99 ± 1.211.36 ± 0.1.810.73 ± 0.74

D-S stage0.8400.8520.4440.9400.882
I7 (15%)1.19 ± 0.791.06 ± 0.740.93 ± 0.630.83 ± 0.671.10 ± 1.30
II2 (4%)1.11 ± 0.070.89 ± 0.031.31 ± 0.000.79 ± 0.250.60 ± 0.19
III39 (81%)1.19 ± 0.901.13 ± 1.091.02 ± 1.051.12 ± 1.450.78 ± 0.68

ISS stage0.0470.0550.0830.0720.027
I7 (15%)1.91 ± 0.921.69 ± 0.791.61 ± 1.001.55 ± 1.021.63 ± 1.25
II11 (23%)1.03 ± 0.760.92 ± 0.750.81 ± 0.581.43 ± 0.980.67 ± 0.47
III30 (62%)1.07 ± 0.821.04 ± 1.120.94 ± 1.050.98 ± 1.430.60 ± 0.60

Renal damage0.0660.0110.0020.0260.010
Yes12 (25%)0.79 ± 0.740.64 ± 0.490.28 ± 0.270.37 ± 0.420.26 ± 0.19
No36 (75%)1.32 ± 0.861.27 ± 0.1.101.27 ± 1.001.40 ± 1.450.93 ± 0.84

ISS, International Staging System; .
3.3. Correlation between miRNA Expression and Different Clinical Features of MM

The results show that the expression levels of miRNAs are related to the clinical characteristics of myeloma (Table 4). Among them, miR-185-5p had positive correlation with hemoglobin, and let-7c-5p, miR-140-3p, miR-185-5p, and miR-425-5p showed negative correlation with increasing creatinine and IL-6 levels. β-CTX, which is an indicator reflecting the activity of osteoclasts, showed negative correlation with detected exosomal miRNAs. All detected miRNAs showed strong negative correlations in disease progression and tumor burden indicators such as β2-microglobulin and myeloma plasma cell load.


Characteristicslet-7c-5plet-7d-5pmiR-140-3pmiR-185-5pmiR-425-5p
rrrrr

Hemoglobin0.1070.4690.2220.1290.3060.0340.3250.0270.2790.058
Neutrophil0.0380.8020.0200.892−0.0770.6090.0440.7730.0000.998
Platelet0.1150.4400.1060.4770.2560.0830.2590.0860.2960.046
Creatinine−0.3090.033−0.2270.120−0.5270.000−0.5000.000−0.5240.000
Ca−0.1400.341−0.0760.6080.0340.821−0.0130.9300.0760.609
β2-Microglobulin−0.3110.031−0.4120.004−0.4370.002−0.4830.001−0.4530.001
ALP−0.0970.513−0.0880.5510.0960.5150.0780.6060.0440.771
LDH−0.0320.8280.0170.907−0.2010.172−0.1400.354−0.1970.185
VEGF−0.0010.996−0.1470.377−0.1060.526−0.1520.370−0.1050.529
IL-6−0.4260.009−0.2440.146−0.3930.016−0.4200.011−0.5180.001
IL-6R−0.2060.215−0.0910.585−0.0380.823−0.0260.877−0.0960.568
TRAP5B−0.0700.6810.0750.661−0.0570.7380.0380.8280.0220.897
β-CTX−0.3260.047−0.3340.044−0.3460.036−0.3490.037−0.4150.011
25-OH-VD0.1240.4650.1280.4500.1770.2960.2480.1440.2370.158
BAP0.0100.9540.0750.660−0.0580.7310.0580.7370.0900.596
BM PC (%)−0.3110.031−0.4120.004−0.4370.002−0.4830.001−0.4530.001

; ; r, correlation; IL-6, interleukin-6; ALP, alkaline phosphatase; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor; IL-6R, interleukin-6 receptor; TRAP5B, tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase; β-CTX, Β-type I collagen carboxy-terminal peptide; 25-OH-VD, 25-hydroxyvitamin D; BAP, bone alkaline phosphatase; BM PC, bone marrow plasma cells.

4. Discussion

MM is a type of B-cell malignancy that is currently incurable. Myeloma cells originate from cells that mediate body fluid immunity. Myeloma is mainly characterized by abnormal secretion of cytokines, abnormal activation of oncogenes, and molecular genetic abnormalities, which play an important role in the occurrence and development of myeloma diseases. In this study, we examined miRNA profiles in MM serum exosomes and calculated uniquely expressed miRNAs. The expression level of specific miRNAs was verified in patients with multiple myeloma. The expression level of miRNA in exosomes in serum was analyzed with the clinical manifestations of the disease.

The expression levels of miRNAs in exosomes and serum were observed to be inconsistent in this study, and no significant correlation was found. Sources of serum RNA include serum circulating RNA, circulating tumor cells, circulating tumor DNA, and exosomes. Exosomes can transfer small molecules from cells to cells to transmit genetic information, which can then be integrated into other cells. Serum and exosomal miRNAs represent different aspects of microenvironmental changes, respectively. Our results show that there is no significant correlation between serum miRNA and exosomal miRNA expression levels, so these two different assays cannot be substituted for each other. Furthermore, due to the presence of RNase, detection of serum miRNAs may result in unstable assays, and specific structures of exosomes may protect RNA from degradation. In conclusion, exosomal miRNAs may be candidates for improved multiple myeloma tumor markers.

Our results showed that the expression levels of let-7d-5p, miR-140-3p, and miR-425-5p in serum exosome of patients with multiple myeloma were significantly lower than those of healthy controls. This result is consistent with the results of miRNA microarrays that are considered to be tumor suppressor genes in a variety of tumor studies. Based on previous studies, the let-7 family miRNAs are lower expressed in both human cancers and stem cells [12, 13]. The let-7 family of miRNAs can regulate the cell cycle, proliferation, and apoptosis by inhibiting pluripotency promoter LIN28, targeting many of the metabolites that regulate tumorigenesis [14]. In the present study, decreased expression of the let-7 family of miRNAs in peripheral blood exosomes of myeloma patients suggests that it may play a role in the pathogenesis of myeloma. Studies have indicated that the overexpression of miR-140-3p enhanced the antitumor effect and the low miR-140-3p level is associated with osteoporosis, which could lead to an increased risk of fractures and could work as a potential biomarker candidate for osteoporosis in postmenopausal women [15]. The expression of miR-425 was revealed to be low in NPC tissues and cell lines. Resumption of miR-425 expression suppressed cell viability and invasion in nasopharyngeal carcinoma [16]. Studies have indicated that miR-185 inhibits proliferation, survival, and invasion of colorectal cancer (CRC), while upregulation of miR-185 enhances the sensitivity of CRC cells to ionizing radiation [17]. All of the above miRNAs may be present as tumor suppressor genes in a variety of tumors.

Myeloma-specific clinical symptoms mainly include kidney damage, bone marrow destruction, and bone destruction. The correlation analysis found that the above abnormally expressed miRNAs have a significant correlation with IL-6, creatinine, and osteoclast-associated factor βCTX expression, suggesting that abnormal miRNA may be related to not only myeloma cell growth but also the characteristics of myeloma. A certain relationship between the occurrence of clinical symptoms might exist. Interleukin 6 (IL-6) is an important growth factor in MM cells [18], and IL-6-related signaling pathway has been shown to regulate MM cell proliferation and programmed cell death in myeloma [19]. Previous studies have shown that elevated serum IL-6 levels are closely related to poor prognosis and short survival time [20]. Studies have shown that stromal cells in the microenvironment of myeloma may inhibit the expression of miRNA in myeloma cells by secreting high levels of IL-6, thereby inhibiting cell proliferation, reducing the sensitivity of myeloma cells to chemotherapeutic drugs, and participating in the occurrence of MM resistance [2123]. There may be a complex regulatory network between miRNA and IL-6 in MM that promotes the progression of myeloma. A previous study had found that IL-6 is a direct target gene for let-7 miRNA, which was downregulated in cancer-associated MSCs. Downregulation of let-7 by cancer-associated MSCs upregulates IL-6 expression [23, 24]. Our correlation analysis suggests that dysregulation of miRNA may affect the level of IL-6 and contribute to the pathogenesis and progression of MM.

In addition, the expression level of exosomal miRNA is negatively correlated with creatinine level, bone marrow plasma cell load, and expression levels of serum factors such as β2-microglobulin and β-CTX (β-type I collagen carboxy-terminal peptide) in myeloma patients, suggesting that the expression level of miRNA in multiple myeloma exosomes is correlated with clinical manifestations of myeloma. It is worth mentioning that β2-microglobulin is associated with both tumor load and kidney injury in myeloma. In this study, there was no obvious significant correlation between kidney injury and β2-microglobulin levels (r = 0.153, ). Therefore, we believe that the significant differences in β2-microglobulin in this study are mainly related to tumor load in myeloma patients. Establishing this relationship helps to understand the pathogenesis of MM, and further study is needed.

Our studies indicate that changes in MM exosomal miRNA expression levels are closely related to the development and progression of myeloma disease. Due to the limited number of subjects involved in this study, further research is needed to elucidate the role of exosomal miRNA in the MM signaling pathway so that it may be an effective biomarker for disease prediction in MM patients.

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Authors’ Contributions

Z. Z. designed the research, analyzed the data, and wrote the paper. Y. L., C. G., and H. W. collected the clinical samples. W. C. is the principal investigator, designed the research, and wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Youth Program, Grant no. 81500164).

References

  1. D. S. Ritchie, H. Quach, K. Fielding, and P. Neeson, “Drug-mediated and cellular immunotherapy in multiple myeloma,” Immunotherapy, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 243–255, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. I. Berindan-Neagoe, P. d. C. Monroig, B. Pasculli, and G. A. Calin, “MicroRNAome genome: a treasure for cancer diagnosis and therapy,” CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, vol. 64, no. 5, pp. 311–336, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. Y. Qin, S. Zhang, S. Deng et al., “Epigenetic silencing of miR-137 induces drug resistance and chromosomal instability by targeting AURKA in multiple myeloma,” Leukemia, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 1123–1135, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. L. G. Lima, R. Chammas, R. Q. Monteiro, M. E. C. Moreira, and M. A. Barcinski, “Tumor-derived microvesicles modulate the establishment of metastatic melanoma in a phosphatidylserine-dependent manner,” Cancer Letters, vol. 283, no. 2, pp. 168–175, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. H. Valadi, K. Ekström, A. Bossios, M. Sjöstrand, J. J. Lee, and J. O. Lötvall, “Exosome-mediated transfer of mRNAs and microRNAs is a novel mechanism of genetic exchange between cells,” Nature Cell Biology, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 654–659, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. S. Manier, C.-J. Liu, H. Avet-Loiseau et al., “Prognostic role of circulating exosomal miRNAs in multiple myeloma,” Blood, vol. 129, no. 17, pp. 2429–2436, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. D. D. Taylor and C. Gercel-Taylor, “MicroRNA signatures of tumor-derived exosomes as diagnostic biomarkers of ovarian cancer,” Gynecologic Oncology, vol. 110, no. 1, pp. 13–21, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. Z. Y. Zhang, Y. C. Li, C. Y. Geng, H. X. Zhou, W. Gao, and W. M. Chen, “Serum exosomal microRNAs as novel biomarkers for multiple myeloma,” Hematological Oncology, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 409–417, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. P. S. Mitchell, R. K. Parkin, E. M. Kroh et al., “Circulating microRNAs as stable blood-based markers for cancer detection,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 105, no. 30, pp. 10513–10518, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. K. J. Livak and T. D. Schmittgen, “Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT method,” Methods, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 402–408, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. T. D. Schmittgen and K. J. Livak, “Analyzing real-time PCR data by the comparative CT method,” Nature Protocols, vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 1101–1108, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. Z. Zuo, G. A. Calin, H. M. de Paula et al., “Circulating microRNAs let-7a and miR-16 predict progression-free survival and overall survival in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome,” Blood, vol. 118, no. 2, pp. 413–415, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. A. Esquela-Kerscher and F. J. Slack, “Oncomirs—microRNAs with a role in cancer,” Nature Reviews Cancer, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 259–269, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. I. Büssing, F. J. Slack, and H. Grosshans, “let-7 microRNAs in development, stem cells and cancer,” Trends in Molecular Medicine, vol. 14, no. 9, pp. 400–409, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. E. G. Ramírez-Salazar, S. Carrillo-Patiño, A. Hidalgo-Bravo et al., “Serum miRNAs miR-140-3p and miR-23b-3p as potential biomarkers for osteoporosis and osteoporotic fracture in postmenopausal Mexican-Mestizo women,” Gene, vol. 679, pp. 19–27, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. W. Zhu, Y. Ma, X. Zhuang, and X. Jin, “MicroRNA-425 is downregulated in nasopharyngeal carcinoma and regulates tumor cell viability and invasion by targeting hepatoma-derived growth factor,” Oncology Letters, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 6345–6351, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. Y. B. Wei, J. J. Liu, J. C. Villaescusa et al., “Elevation of IL6 is associated with disturbed let-7 biogenesis in a genetic model of depression,” Translational Psychiatry, vol. 6, no. 8, p. e869, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. R. A. Kyle and S. V. Rajkumar, “Multiple myeloma,” New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 351, no. 18, pp. 1860–1873, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. X.-N. Song, J.-Z. Yang, L.-X. Sun et al., “Expression levels of IL-27 and IL-17 in multiple myeloma patients: a higher ratio of IL-27:IL-17 in bone marrow was associated with a superior progression-free survival,” Leukemia Research, vol. 37, no. 9, pp. 1094–1099, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. M. Bhutani, Z. Shahid, A. Schnebelen, D. Alapat, and S. Z. Usmani, “Cutaneous manifestations of multiple myeloma and other plasma cell proliferative disorders,” Seminars in Oncology, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 395–400, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. F. Sanz-Rodrı́guez, A. Hidalgo, and J. Teixidó, “Chemokine stromal cell-derived factor-1α modulates VLA-4 integrin-mediated multiple myeloma cell adhesion to CS-1/fibronectin and VCAM-1,” Blood, vol. 97, no. 2, pp. 346–351, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. A. K. Azab, J. M. Runnels, C. Pitsillides et al., “CXCR4 inhibitor AMD3100 disrupts the interaction of multiple myeloma cells with the bone marrow microenvironment and enhances their sensitivity to therapy,” Blood, vol. 113, no. 18, pp. 4341–4351, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. P. M. Voorhees, R. F. Manges, P. Sonneveld et al., “A phase 2 multicentre study of siltuximab, an anti-interleukin-6 monoclonal antibody, in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma,” British Journal of Haematology, vol. 161, no. 3, pp. 357–366, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. S. Y. Sung, C. H. Liao, H. P. Wu et al., “Loss of let-7 microRNA upregulates IL-6 in bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells triggering a reactive stromal response to prostate cancer,” PLoS One, vol. 8, no. 8, Article ID e71637, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2019 Zhi-yao Zhang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder
Views424
Downloads336
Citations

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted research articles as well as case reports and case series related to COVID-19. Review articles are excluded from this waiver policy. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.