BioMed Research International

BioMed Research International / 2020 / Article
Special Issue

Prevention and Early Detection of Gastrointestinal Cancers

View this Special Issue

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2020 |Article ID 5958272 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/5958272

Hongtu Zheng, Yuchen Wu, Tianan Guo, Fangqi Liu, Ye Xu, Sanjun Cai, "Hypoxia Induces Growth Differentiation Factor 15 to Promote the Metastasis of Colorectal Cancer via PERK-eIF2α Signaling", BioMed Research International, vol. 2020, Article ID 5958272, 12 pages, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/5958272

Hypoxia Induces Growth Differentiation Factor 15 to Promote the Metastasis of Colorectal Cancer via PERK-eIF2α Signaling

Academic Editor: Guoku Hu
Received18 Apr 2019
Revised06 Jul 2019
Accepted08 Aug 2019
Published29 Jan 2020

Abstract

Hypoxia plays an essential role in orchestrating Epithelial-mesenchymal transition and promoting metastasis of colorectal cancer. However, the underlying mechanisms are still not well elucidated. Here, we present that hypoxic exposure causes endoplasmic reticulum stress and activates the unfolded protein response pathways, which drives GDF15 expression in colorectal cancer cells. Mechanistically, upregulated CHOP led by activated PERK-eIF2α signaling promotes GDF15 transcription via directly binding to its promoter. Further study implicates that hypoxia-induced GDF15 is required for the EMT and invasion of colorectal cancer cells; enforced expression of GDF15 promotes the mitochondrial oxidation of fatty acids in colorectal cancer cells. Moreover, the abrogation of GDF15 results in smaller xenograft tumors in size and impaired metastasis. GDF15 is expressed much more in tumor tissues of CRC patients and displays positive correlations with CHOP and HIF1α in mRNA levels. Our study demonstrates a novel molecular mechanism underlying hypoxia-promoted metastasis of CRC and provides PERK signaling-regulated GDF15 as a new and promising therapeutic target for clinical treatment and drug discovery.

1. Introduction

As one of the most malignant cancers, colorectal carcinoma (CRC) is the second most prevalent cause of death from cancer in the western world. About one-third of the 147,000 patients of CRC will succumb to the disease each year in the USA [1].

With the rapid and progressive growth of malignant tumors (e.g., CRC), tumor cells in the ischemic/hypoxic condition are prone to transform to the metastatic phenotype with reduced intercellular adhesion as well as increased cell motility and invasiveness [25]. Hypoxia or the overexpression of Hypoxia-induced factor (HIF) could sufficiently induce epithelial-mesenchyme transition (EMT) and invasion in multiple cell types, including CRC [57]. Through regulating distinct signal transduction pathways, hypoxia orchestrates EMT of various cancers in direct or indirect manners [79]. However, the detailed molecular mechanisms underlying hypoxia-mediating metastasis remain obscure.

The unfolded protein response (UPR) acts as a cytoprotective response to ER stress led by the accumulation of unfolded or misfolded proteins inside of this organelle [1012]. In mammalian cells, three core UPR-associated signaling pathways orchestrate the adaptive responses to alleviate ER stress, including the expansion of the ER capacity, promotion of ER-associated degradation and chaperone functions, and apoptosis if unabated [13]. Sustained ER stress and activation of UPR pathways have been observed in many cancers and are crucial in tumor progression [1418]. Hypoxic cells in a tumor mass accumulate free radicals resulted from shift cellular metabolism and also stress the ER to accumulate misfolded proteins, which could activate the UPR pathways [19]. However, it is still uncertain whether hypoxic condition induces the activation of UPR in CRC cells. Growing studies have reported that ER stress could promote EMT and invasion in types of cancers [2022]. PERK-eIF2α branch is revealed as critical signaling in regulating EMT of tumor cells [21]. However, it remains unclear that the downstream molecular of PERK-eIF2α branch is involved in the regulation of EMT. New mediators are needed to be characterized to clarify the molecular mechanism underlying UPR-associated tumor metastasis.

Growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF15), also known as macrophage inhibitor cytokine (MIC-1), is a member of the transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β)/bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) superfamily and a secreted protein circulating in plasma as a 25 kDa homodimer [23, 24]. GDF15 has been reported to have multiple functions in various pathologies, including inflammation, cancer, cardiovascular diseases, and obesity [25]. Moreover, the circulating levels of GDF15 are elevated in several cancers, including endometrial cancer, prostate cancer, pancreatic cancer, and colorectal cancer [2629]. However, the exact role of GDF15 in tumor progression still needs to be well elucidated.

Previous studies uncovered that CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein homologous protein (CHOP), a critical transcription factor in the downstream of PERK-eIF2α signaling, drives the transcription of GDF15 in murine skeletal muscle upon metabolic stress [30]. In this study, we present that ER stress is dramatically induced by hypoxia exposure and subsequently activated PERK-eIF2α signaling promotes the metastasis via regulating GDF15 expression in CRC cells.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Cell Culture and Human Tissue Samples

Human colorectal cancer cell lines, HT29 and SW480, were obtained from Cell Bank of Shanghai, Shanghai Institutes of Biological Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences. HT29 cells were P141 when purchased and SW480 were P108. The cells used in this study were passaged within 10 generations. HT29 cells were cultured in high-glucose Dulbecco’s modified Eagle medium (DMEM; Corning, #MT10013CV) supplemented with 10% v/v fetal bovine serum (Gibico, Thermo Fisher, #26140). SW480 cells were cultured in Leibovitz’s L-15 medium (Invitrogen, #11415064) supplemented with 10% v/v FBS (Gibico, Thermo Fisher, #26140). For cell experiments, the cells were resuspended in the medium for 1 × 105/ml and seeded in the plate according to the assay. For TUDCA treatment, sodium TUDCA (Sigma, #T0266) with the purity (TC) of >95% was dissolved in ethanol for a stock concentration of 40 mmol/L. Ethanol was added into the medium for vehicle control.

For the normoxia group, cells were grown at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 (∼20% O2) as previously described [31]. For hypoxia exposure (1% O2), cells were cultured in the hypoxia chamber (5% CO2/94% N2, Forma Scientific, Marietta, OH, USA) for the indicated time.

Tissue samples of 21 CRC patients were collected from Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center (Shanghai, China) between December 2009 and June 2016. The study is approved by the ethics committee of Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center and carried out in accordance with Ethical Principles for Medical Research involving Human Subjects (World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki). The experiments were undertaken with the understanding and written consent of each subject.

2.2. Quantitative Real-Time PCR

qRT-PCR was conducted as previously described [32]. Briefly, cell or tissue samples were fixed and lysed by TRizol (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and then prepared for total RNA extraction. Total RNA was then used for cDNA synthesis by using M-MLV reverse transcriptase following the manufacturer’s instructions. Indicated mRNA levels were determined by quantitative real-time PCR using SYBR Premix Ex Taq (ABI) and GAPDH of humans and mice as internal control, respectively.

2.3. Immunoblotting

Immunoblotting was performed as previously described [33]. Briefly, cell or tissue samples were homogenized for dissecting in RIPA lysis buffer. The supernatant was collected after centrifuging and then incubated in 100°C for 10 min following the addition of loading buffer. After being separated by using SDS-PAGE, proteins in the gel were transferred to the polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membrane. Following the incubation of the membrane with 10% fat-free milk for 1 hr membranes were respectively subjected to overnight incubation with the primary antibodies at 4°C and then incubated in horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies. Proteins were detected by enhanced chemiluminescence assay (Thermo Fisher Scientific).

2.4. Luciferase Reporter Assay

The potential promoter region of human GDF15 was inserted into the pGL3 basic plasmid, corresponding to the region of −2000 to +100 with respect to the putative transcription start site (denoted nucleotide +1). The constructed plasmids were transfected into HT29 cells to determine luciferase activities by using Dual-luciferase Assay Kit (Promega) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

2.5. Seahorse Analysis

FAO assays were conducted by using Seahorse XF24e extracellular flux analyzer (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) according to the instruction. In brief, CRC cells were plated in XF cell culture microplates and cultured in normal medium for 4 hours which were then replaced with a substrate-limited medium for 16 hours. FAO assay medium was added before the assay followed with the addition of XF palmitate-BSA FAO substrate. The oxygen consumption rate (OCR) was detected by Mito stress test protocols of seahorse XF24e extracellular flux analyzer.

2.6. Tumor Cell Invasion Assay

Invasion assays were performed using the cell invasion chamber (BD) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Briefly, HT29 and SW480 cells in serum-free medium were added to the upper chamber and medium supplemented with 2% FBS was added to the lower chamber to be subsequently subjected to normoxia or 1% O2 for 48 hours. The invasive tumor cells were subsequently fixed by methanol and then subjected to crystal violet staining. For quantification, the cells were counted under a microscope in randomly selected five predetermined fields (200x).

2.7. Establishment of GDF15 Knockdown Cells and Tumor Xenograft Mouse Model

For knockdown endogenous GDF15, shRNA designed to target human GDF15 mRNA (shGDF15) was purchased from Invitrogen and negative control shRNA (NC) was from Genepharma. For the selection of GDF15 stable knockdown cells, the oligoduplexes synthesized based on the sequence of shGDF15 or negative control shRNA were cloned into the pRetroSuper vector (Origene). HT29 cells were transfected with shGDF15 vector (shGDF15) or control vector (NC) and then selected for 2 weeks with 2 μg/ml puromycin (Sigma). For tumor xenograft mouse, HT29 cells of NC or shGDF15 were injected into the dorsal flank of female athymic nude mice (4-5 weeks old) in a laminar flow cabinet. Tumor formation in nude mice was monitored and the tumors were excised 12 days after the injection. All experiments in this study were performed in accordance with protocols approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Fudan University.

2.8. Statistical Analysis

All experiments presented in this paper have been repeated more than 3 times. Data are presented as the mean ± standard error of means (s.e.m.). Statistical analysis (GraphPad Prism 5.0) was performed using the two-tailed independent Student’s t-test after a demonstration of homogeneity of variance with the F test or one-way or two-way ANOVA for more than two groups. Statistical significance was set as .

3. Results

3.1. Hypoxia-Induced ER Stress Enhances Metastasis of CRC Cells

To explore whether hypoxia could induce ER stress, CRC cells (HT29 and SW480) were subjected to hypoxic exposure (1% O2). Compared to normoxia-incubated cells, both HT29 and SW480 cells exhibited extremely higher expression levels of UPR-associated genes, including spliced XBP1 (XBP1s/XBP1t), BIP, CHOP, and ATF4 (Figures 1(a) and 1(b)). Meanwhile, hypoxic exposure also exacerbated the phosphorylation levels of IRE1α and eIF2α, as well as protein levels of CHOP in both HT29 and SW480 cells, respectively (Figure 1(c)). These in vitro results revealed that hypoxia led by low oxygen supply causes ER stress and subsequently activates the UPR pathways in CRC cells.

To explore the physiological role of hypoxia-activated UPR pathways, tauroursodeoxycholic acid (TUDCA) was utilized to alleviate cellular ER stress in CRC cells [34]. As expected, the addition of TUDCA efficiently reduced XBP1 splicing (Figure S1A) and mRNA levels of UPR genes, including CHOP, ATF4, and BIP (Figure S1B). As hypoxia could promote EMT and invasion of CRC cells [35], we postulated that ER stress is also involved in the metastasis of CRC cells upon hypoxic exposure. In consistency with previous studies, hypoxic treatment significantly gave rise to the protein levels of N-Cadherin and Vimentin while reduced E-cadherin in HT29 cells (Figure 1(d)) and consequently accelerated the migration and invasion of HT-29 cells (Figures 1(e) and 1(f)). Intriguing, the addition of TUDCA almost abolished the impacts on EMT-associated genes which were induced by hypoxia in HT29 cells (Figure 1(d)) and efficiently attenuated cell migration which was exacerbated by hypoxic exposure (Figures 1(e) and 1(f)). These results indicate that hypoxia-induced ER stress and UPR pathway activation are essential for CRC cell metastasis.

3.2. Hypoxia Gives Rise to GDF15 Expression via CHOP Signaling in CRC Cells

Previous studies demonstrated that GDF15 is implicated as an oxygen-regulated transcript responding to hypoxia and anoxia [36, 37]. To determine whether GDF15 is regulated upon hypoxia exposure, we introduced two ex vivo models to mimic hypoxia, including 1% O2 incubation and CoCl2 treatment. Interestingly, GDF15 mRNA levels and extracellular secreted GDF15 were dramatically heightened in both HT29 and SW480 cells after being incubated in 1% O2 (Figures 2(a) and 2(b); Figures S2A and S2B) or treated with CoCl2 (Figures S2C and S2D), respectively. As ER stress was reported to play an essential role in regulating GDF15 transcription [38, 39], we utilized TUDCA to investigate whether ER stress is required for hypoxia-induced GDF15 expression. Impressively, TUDCA treatment significantly diminished GDF15 mRNA levels and extracellular GDF15 protein levels which were upregulated by hypoxic exposure (Figures 2(a) and 2(b)). Furthermore, luciferase reporter assays also demonstrated that the addition of TUDCA sufficiently repressed the activity of GDF15 promoter which could be highly activated by hypoxic treatment (Figure 2(c)), indicating that the activation of UPR pathways is required for regulating GDF15 transcription in CRC cells. CHOP, the critical downstream transcription factor of PERK-eIF2α pathway, is reported to drive GDF15 expression in skeletal muscle and hepatocytes [30, 38]. Surprisingly, ectopic expression of CHOP extremely amplified the mRNA levels of GDF15 in HT29 cells (Figure 2(d)). In contrast, the abrogation of endogenous CHOP using shRNA targeted at human CHOP mRNA (shCHOP) efficiently reduced GDF15 expression in HT29 cells (Figure 2(e)). Subsequently, we applied the luciferase reporter assay and chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assay to determine whether CHOP directly regulates GDF15 transcription. The loss of CHOP strongly impaired hypoxia-activated activity of luciferase of which expression was driven by GDF15 promoter (Figure 2(f)). Meanwhile, the chromatin of GDF15 promoter was coimmunoprecipitated with the anti-Flag antibodies which target exogenous Flag-tagged CHOP, indicating the direct interaction between CHOP and GDF15 promoter DNA (Figure 2(g)). Together, these results revealed that CHOP drives the transcription of GDF15 via directly binding its promoter in hypoxia-exposed CRC cells.

3.3. GDF15 Is Essential for Hypoxia-Promoting EMT and Invasion of CRC Cells

To explore the physiological functions of upregulated GDF15 in the setting of hypoxia, we investigated the role of GDF15 in tumor cell metastasis, which is highly promoted upon hypoxia. The ectopic expression of GDF15 in HT29 cells dramatically altered protein levels of EMT-associated genes expression, including increased N-cad and Vimentin while decreased E-cad (Figure 3(a)). Moreover, GDF15-overexpressed HT29 cells also exhibited enhanced cell invasion and migration compared to the control group (Figures 3(b) and 3(c)). In accordance with the effects led by the ectopic expression, the loss of endogenous GDF15 resulted in impaired EMT (Figure 3(d)), as well as cell migration and invasion (Figures 3(e) and 3(f)). Therefore, the results showed that hypoxia-induced GDF15 is critical in regulating the metastasis of CRC cells.

3.4. GDF15 Enhances Fat Acid Oxidation of CRC Cells

A growing number of studies implicates that increased GDF15 could promote mitochondrial fat acid β-oxidation (FAO) [35], which is essential for metastasis of cancer cells [6, 40]. To explore whether fatty acid metabolism could be regulated by GDF15 in CRC cells, we assessed the mRNA levels of key genes involved in FAO process. Impressively, all FAO-associated genes were dramatically increased after the overexpression of GDF15 in HT29 cells (Figure 4(a)). To validate that the upregulation of the genes resulted in enhanced FAO activity, FAO assays were performed by using seahorse XF24e extracellular flux analyzer. After being subjected to starvation and then exogenous fatty acid treatment, tumor cells with GDF15 overexpression displayed robustly enhanced maximal respiration and burned much more fatty acids to supply energy (Figures 4(b) and 4(c)). Together, these results demonstrated that GDF15 promotes the usage of fatty acids via β-oxidation and enhances the ATP production in CRC cells.

3.5. Abrogation of GDF15 Represses the Development and Metastasis of Xenograft Tumor

To investigate the role of GDF15 in the growth of CRC cells, CCK8 assays were applied to evaluate cell proliferation levels. Interestingly, enforced GDF15 expression augmented the growth rate of HT29 cells, while the silence of endogenous GDF15 efficiently attenuated the proliferation levels of CRC cells (Figures S3A and S3B), indicating that GDF15 could promote the CRC cell growth. Next, we utilized flow cytometry by Annexin V and PI staining to assess the cell viability. Relative to control groups, the percentages of dead cells (due to both apoptosis and necrosis) were significantly reduced in the HT29 cells with overexpressed GDF15 (∼20% reduction, Figure S3C) or rGDF15 treatment (∼35% reduction, Figure S3D), while the percentage increased ∼9% in GDF15-deficient HT29 cells (Figure S3E).

To further elucidate the role of GDF15 in tumor progression in vivo, we generated HT29 cells with stably expressing shGDF15 to abrogate endogenous GDF15 in cells. Then, HT29 cells were subcutaneously injected into the dorsal flanks of nude mice and typical tumors were observed 2 weeks later. Intriguingly, compared to the NC group, tumors of shGDF15 exhibited much smaller sizes and extreme reduction in growth rate (Figure 5(a)). Furthermore, EMT was dramatically repressed in the shGDF15-expressing tumors, in which expression levels of N-Cadherin and Vimentin were obviously reduced (Figure 5(b)), implicating the repression of tumor metastasis after GDF15 abrogation. Additionally, relative to control tumors, the shGDF15-expressing tumors displayed less Ki67-positive cells (Figure 5(c)), reflecting the impairments of cell proliferation in the shGDF15-expressing tumor. Together, these results revealed that GDF15 is required for the development and metastasis of xenograft tumors in vivo.

3.6. Overexpressed GDF15 in Tumors of Human CRC Displayed High Correlation with CHOP

To investigate the GDF15 expression levels in tumors of CRC patients, we analyzed the pattern of GDF15 expression in both tumor tissues and matched peritumor tissues from 21 CRC patients. The results of IHC staining exhibited that GDF15 levels of tumors were much higher than that of peritumor (Figure 6(a)), and moreover, CHOP levels also significantly increased in tumor tissues (Figure 6(b)), suggesting the positive correlation between GDF15 and CHOP. Linear regression analysis of mRNA levels in CRC tumors revealed a significantly positive correlation between GDF15 and CHOP (Figure 6(c)), as well as between GDF15 and HIF1a (Figure 6(d)). These data demonstrate that GDF15 is highly expressed in tumors of CRC patients and display a positive correlation with both CHOP and HIF1a in mRNA levels.

4. Discussion

The intrinsic properties and microenvironments of a tumor cell are critical in the dissemination and metastasis of cancer cells. In this study, we demonstrate that GDF15 plays an essential role in mediating hypoxia-initiated EMT and metastasis of colorectal cancer cells. In CRC cells, ER stress is induced upon hypoxic exposure and the alleviation of ER stress by TUDCA significantly represses hypoxia-induced EMT and metastasis of tumor cells. Further studies reveal that hypoxia gives rise to the expression of GDF15 which is driven by CHOP in the PERK-eIF2α signaling. Highly expressed GDF15 promotes the metastasis of CRC cells and meanwhile accelerates the growth of tumor cells (Figure 6(e)). The results of the in vivo study also show that GDF15 abrogation dramatically attenuates the development and metastasis of xenograft tumors derived from CRC cells.

In most solid tumors, the metastasis during which cancer cells become prone to be migratory and invasive is frequently accompanying with the hypoxic tumor microenvironment. Due to the properties of high levels of proliferation and metabolism while poor vascularization in tumors, colorectal carcinoma is often subject to many forms of stresses, including glucose deprivation, hypoxia, acidosis, and low pH value [14, 41]. In our current study, we found that hypoxia could trigger the ER stress and activate the UPR pathways, including PERK-eIF2α signaling (Figure 1), which is thought to be definitely implicated in tumor cell EMT [21]. Previous studies indicate that activated PERK-eIF2α signaling could drive the expression of GDF15 [38], which is discovered as an important mediator in promoting cell growth of prostate cancer [42] and EMT of CRC cells in vitro [43], and even acts as a driver in cachexia progression [44, 45]. In consistency with these studies, our current work also reveals the essential roles of hypoxia-induced GDF15 in the metastasis of CRC in vitro (Figure 3) and the progression of xenograft tumors in vivo (Figure 5). In contrary to the study of Li et al. [43], we found that besides promoting EMT of CRC cells, enhanced expression of GDF15 could also give rise to the proliferation of CRC cells (Figure S3) and is required for the growth of xenograft tumor in vivo (Figure 5), suggesting the multiple roles of GDF15 in CRC progression.

It is worth noting that increased GDF15 expression in CRC cells efficiently promotes the mitochondrial fatty acid β-oxidation and increase the production of ATP (Figure 4). Linking to the critical role of fatty acid oxidation in metastasis of tumor cells, we hypothesize that the exacerbated GDF15 regulates the EMT and metastasis of CRC cells via enhancing the utilization of fatty acids to produce more fuels for cell growth and migration. More studies are needed to fully clarify the functions and mechanisms of GDF15 in tumor progression, especially in regulating cellular metabolism of cancers.

The UPR may assist in several aspects of tumor biology, ranging from tumorigenesis, apoptotic evasion, metastasis, angiogenesis, and chemotherapy resistance [46]. Tumor progression is characterized by UPR activation induced by the challenging growth conditions associated with hypoxia [46]. Among the three branches of UPR pathways, the PERK-eIF2α pathway largely contributes to the growth and survival of cancer under hypoxic stress [47]. Interestingly, PERK is reported to be responsible for the activation of many angiogenic genes. However, the molecular mediator(s) underlying PERK-eIF2α regulating tumor cell growth and metastasis is/are not clearly uncovered. We demonstrated that upon hypoxia exposure, induced CHOP could bind to the promoter of GDF15 to activate its transcription (Figure 2), which is consistent with the previous study in skeletal muscle [30]. It is worth noting that CHOP is commonly considered as a driver for inducing cell apoptosis in most tumors including CRC [14, 48]. Our in vitro results, however, indicate that CHOP-activated GDF15 expression is required for the cell survival of CRC cells, suggesting a negative feedback of GDF15 in the activation PERK-eIF2α-CHOP signaling during hypoxia.

5. Conclusions

In summary, our current work reveals a novel molecular mechanism of GDF15 expression regulated by activated UPR pathway in CRC cells upon hypoxia exposure, which might serve as a promising therapeutic target for clinical treatment and drug discovery.

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Authors’ Contributions

H. Zheng, Y. Xu, and S. Cai conceived and designed the studies. H. Zheng and Y. Wu conducted most of the experiments and analyzed the data. T. Guo and F. Liu conducted some animal experiments. H. Zheng and S. Cai wrote the manuscript.

Acknowledgments

This work was partially supported by the Shanghai Charity Cancer Fund (grant no. HYXH1608) and the Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center Fund (grant no. YJ201406).

Supplementary Materials

Figure S1: TUDCA alleviates hypoxia-induced ER stress in CRC cells. Figure S2: hypoxia exacerbates GDF15 expression and secretion in CRC cells. Figure S3: GDF15 accelerates cell growth and reduces cell death of CRC cells. (Supplementary Materials)

References

  1. D. A. Lieberman, “Screening for colorectal cancer,” New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 361, no. 12, pp. 1179–1187, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. G. Bellot, R. Garcia-Medina, P. Gounon et al., “Hypoxia-induced autophagy is mediated through hypoxia-inducible factor induction of BNIP3 and BNIP3L via their BH3 domains,” Molecular and Cellular Biology, vol. 29, no. 10, pp. 2570–2581, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. E. K. Rofstad, J.-V. Gaustad, T. A. M. Egeland, B. Mathiesen, and K. Galappathi, “Tumors exposed to acute cyclic hypoxic stress show enhanced angiogenesis, perfusion and metastatic dissemination,” International Journal of Cancer, vol. 127, no. 7, pp. 1535–1546, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. C. C.-L. Wong, A. P.-W. Tse, Y.-P. Huang et al., “Lysyl oxidase-like 2 is critical to tumor microenvironment and metastatic niche formation in hepatocellular carcinoma,” Hepatology, vol. 60, no. 5, pp. 1645–1658, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. E. B. Rankin and A. J. Giaccia, “Hypoxic control of metastasis,” Science, vol. 352, no. 6282, pp. 175–180, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. U. Harjes, J. Kalucka, and P. Carmeliet, “Targeting fatty acid metabolism in cancer and endothelial cells,” Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology, vol. 97, pp. 15–21, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. T. Vu and P. K. Datta, “Regulation of EMT in colorectal cancer: a culprit in metastasis,” Cancers (Basel), vol. 9, no. 12, p. 171, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. B. J. Choi, S. A. Park, S. Y. Lee, Y. N. Cha, and Y. J. Surh, “Hypoxia induces epithelial-mesenchymal transition in colorectal cancer cells through ubiquitin-specific protease 47-mediated stabilization of Snail: a potential role of Sox9,” Scientific Reports, vol. 7, no. 1, Article ID 15918, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. W. Zhang, X. Shi, Y. Peng et al., “HIF-1α promotes epithelial-mesenchymal transition and metastasis through direct regulation of ZEB1 in colorectal cancer,” PLoS One, vol. 10, no. 6, Article ID e0129603, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. M. Schröder and R. J. Kaufman, “The mammalian unfolded protein response,” Annual Review of Biochemistry, vol. 74, no. 1, pp. 739–789, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. D. J. Todd, A.-H. Lee, and L. H. Glimcher, “The endoplasmic reticulum stress response in immunity and autoimmunity,” Nature Reviews Immunology, vol. 8, no. 9, pp. 663–674, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. P. Walter and D. Ron, “The unfolded protein response: from stress pathway to homeostatic regulation,” Science, vol. 334, no. 6059, pp. 1081–1086, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. A. Kaser and R. S. Blumberg, “Introduction: the unfolded protein response’s role in disease pathophysiology,” Seminars in Immunopathology, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 255–257, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. M. Wang and R. J. Kaufman, “The impact of the endoplasmic reticulum protein-folding environment on cancer development,” Nature Reviews Cancer, vol. 14, no. 9, pp. 581–597, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. S. A. Oakes and F. R. Papa, “The role of endoplasmic reticulum stress in human pathology,” Annual Review of Pathology: Mechanisms of Disease, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 173–194, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. Y. Ma and L. M. Hendershot, “The role of the unfolded protein response in tumour development: friend or foe?” Nature Reviews Cancer, vol. 4, no. 12, pp. 966–977, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. E. Chevet, C. Hetz, and A. Samali, “Endoplasmic reticulum stress-activated cell reprogramming in oncogenesis,” Cancer Discovery, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 586–597, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. Y. Wu, B. Shan, J. Dai et al., “Dual role for inositol-requiring enzyme 1α in promoting the development of hepatocellular carcinoma during diet-induced obesity in mice,” Hepatology, vol. 68, no. 2, pp. 533–546, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. S. Chipurupalli, E. Kannan, V. Tergaonkar, R. D’. Andrea, and N. Robinson, “Hypoxia induced ER stress response as an adaptive mechanism in cancer,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 20, no. 3, p. 749, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. H. Tanjore, D.-S. Cheng, A. L. Degryse et al., “Alveolar epithelial cells undergo epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition in response to endoplasmic reticulum stress,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 286, no. 35, pp. 30972–30980, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. Y.-X. Feng, E. S. Sokol, C. A. Del Vecchio et al., “Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition activates PERK-eIF2 and sensitizes cells to endoplasmic reticulum stress,” Cancer Discovery, vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 702–715, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. H. J. Clarke, J. E. Chambers, E. Liniker, and S. J. Marciniak, “Endoplasmic reticulum stress in malignancy,” Cancer Cell, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 563–573, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. R. Adela and S. K. Banerjee, “GDF-15 as a target and biomarker for diabetes and cardiovascular diseases: a translational prospective,” Journal of Diabetes Research, vol. 2015, Article ID 490842, 14 pages, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. H. Johnen, S. Lin, T. Kuffner et al., “Tumor-induced anorexia and weight loss are mediated by the TGF-β superfamily cytokine MIC-1,” Nature Medicine, vol. 13, no. 11, pp. 1333–1340, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. K. Unsicker, B. Spittau, and K. Krieglstein, “The multiple facets of the TGF-β family cytokine growth/differentiation factor-15/macrophage inhibitory cytokine-1,” Cytokine & Growth Factor Reviews, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 373–384, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. X. Wang, Y. Li, H. Tian et al., “Macrophage inhibitory cytokine 1 (MIC-1/GDF15) as a novel diagnostic serum biomarker in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma,” BMC Cancer, vol. 14, no. 1, p. 578, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. A. C. Staff, J. Trovik, E. A. G. Zahl et al., “Elevated plasma growth differentiation factor-15 correlates with lymph node metastases and poor survival in endometrial cancer,” Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 17, no. 14, pp. 4825–4833, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. D. A. Brown, F. Lindmark, P. Stattin et al., “Macrophage inhibitory cytokine 1: a new prognostic marker in prostate cancer,” Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 15, no. 21, pp. 6658–6664, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. R. S. Mehta, M. Song, N. Bezawada et al., “A prospective study of macrophage inhibitory cytokine-1 (MIC-1/GDF15) and risk of colorectal cancer,” JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute, vol. 106, no. 4, Article ID dju016, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. H. K. Chung, D. Ryu, K. S. Kim et al., “Growth differentiation factor 15 is a myomitokine governing systemic energy homeostasis,” The Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 216, no. 1, pp. 149–165, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. R. Wenger, V. Kurtcuoglu, C. Scholz, H. Marti, and D. Hoogewijs, “Frequently asked questions in hypoxia research,” Hypoxia, vol. 3, pp. 35–43, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. M. Shao, B. Shan, Y. Liu et al., “Hepatic IRE1α regulates fasting-induced metabolic adaptive programs through the XBP1s-PPARα axis signalling,” Nature Communications, vol. 5, p. 3528, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. B. Shan, X. Wang, Y. Wu et al., “The metabolic ER stress sensor IRE1α suppresses alternative activation of macrophages and impairs energy expenditure in obesity,” Nature Immunology, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 519–529, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. J. Ishiyama, R. Taguchi, Y. Akasaka et al., “Unsaturated FAs prevent palmitate-induced LOX-1 induction via inhibition of ER stress in macrophages,” Journal of Lipid Research, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 299–307, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. M. Zhang, W. Sun, J. Qian, and Y. Tang, “Fasting exacerbates hepatic growth differentiation factor 15 to promote fatty acid β-oxidation and ketogenesis via activating XBP1 signaling in liver,” Redox Biology, vol. 16, pp. 87–96, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. M. Albertoni, P. H. Shaw, M. Nozaki et al., “Anoxia induces macrophage inhibitory cytokine-1 (MIC-1) in glioblastoma cells independently of p53 and HIF-1,” Oncogene, vol. 21, no. 27, pp. 4212–4219, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. S. Lakhal, N. P. Talbot, A. Crosby et al., “Regulation of growth differentiation factor 15 expression by intracellular iron,” Blood, vol. 113, no. 7, pp. 1555–1563, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. D. Li, H. Zhang, and Y. Zhong, “Hepatic GDF15 is regulated by CHOP of the unfolded protein response and alleviates NAFLD progression in obese mice,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 498, no. 3, pp. 388–394, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. S.-H. Park, H. J. Choi, H. Yang et al., “Two in-and-out modulation strategies for endoplasmic reticulum stress-linked gene expression of pro-apoptotic macrophage-inhibitory cytokine 1,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 287, no. 24, pp. 19841–19855, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. K. M. Nieman, H. A. Kenny, C. V. Penicka et al., “Adipocytes promote ovarian cancer metastasis and provide energy for rapid tumor growth,” Nature Medicine, vol. 17, no. 11, pp. 1498–1503, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. M. J. Mann and L. M. Hendershot, “UPR activation alters chemosensitivity of tumor cells,” Cancer Biology & Therapy, vol. 5, no. 7, pp. 736–740, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. Y. Husaini, G. P. Lockwood, T. V. Nguyen et al., “Macrophage inhibitory cytokine-1 (MIC-1/GDF15) gene deletion promotes cancer growth in TRAMP prostate cancer prone mice,” PLoS One, vol. 10, no. 2, Article ID e0115189, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. C. Li, J. Wang, J. Kong et al., “GDF15 promotes EMT and metastasis in colorectal cancer,” Oncotarget, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 860–872, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. L. Lerner, J. Tao, Q. Liu et al., “MAP3K11/GDF15 axis is a critical driver of cancer cachexia,” Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 467–482, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. V. W. W. Tsai, Y. Husaini, R. Manandhar et al., “Anorexia/cachexia of chronic diseases: a role for the TGF-β family cytokine MIC-1/GDF15,” Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 239–243, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. C. Giampietri, S. Petrungaro, S. Conti, A. Facchiano, A. Filippini, and E. Ziparoet, “Cancer microenvironment and endoplasmic reticulum stress response,” Mediators of Inflammation, vol. 2015, p. 417281, 2015. View at: Google Scholar
  47. C. Koumenis, “ER stress, hypoxia tolerance and tumor progression,” Current Molecular Medicine, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 55–69, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. M. Lu, D. A. Lawrence, S. Marsters et al., “Opposing unfolded-protein-response signals converge on death receptor 5 to control apoptosis,” Science, vol. 345, no. 6192, pp. 98–101, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2020 Hongtu Zheng et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder
Views365
Downloads332
Citations

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted research articles as well as case reports and case series related to COVID-19. Review articles are excluded from this waiver policy. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.