Ultrasound-Guided Thoracic Paravertebral Nerve Block on Postoperative Pain, Quality of Life, and Recovery in Patients with Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Zheng, Cuijuan; Wang, Jiayu; Xie, Shouxiang

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6692815

BioMed Research International

On this page

Abstract Introduction Results Discussion Conclusion Data Availability Ethical Approval Consent Conflicts of Interest Authors’ Contributions Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2021 | Article ID 6692815 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6692815

Ultrasound-Guided Thoracic Paravertebral Nerve Block on Postoperative Pain, Quality of Life, and Recovery in Patients with Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Cuijuan Zheng,¹Jiayu Wang,¹and Shouxiang Xie²

Academic Editor: Christina Pabelick

Received03 Oct 2020

Revised08 Dec 2020

Accepted09 Jan 2021

Published11 Feb 2021

Abstract

Objectives. Our study will investigate the effect of ultrasound-guided thoracic paravertebral block (UG-TPVB) on postoperative pain, quality of life, and enhanced recovery in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) undergoing lobectomy surgery. Methods. Our study included 100 patients aged 52 to 75 years who underwent lobectomy surgery with pathological diagnosis of NSCLC. Patients received ultrasound-guided thoracic paravertebral block or general anesthesia with tracheal intubation. Patients’ pain score was recorded on a numeric rating scale (NRS) 24 hours post operation. The total postoperative dosage of tramadol hydrochloride, length of hospitalization, quality of life (QoL), and inflammation levels were recorded. Results. Compared with patients who received general anesthesia with tracheal intubation, patients in the UG-TPVB group had lower postoperative NRS scores at 24 h (1.8 vs. 3.5, ); the average 24 h postoperative NRS score of the UG-TPVB group is lower than that of the general anesthesia with tracheal intubation (4.6 vs. 5.3, ), thus receiving less dosage of tramadol hydrochloride ( vs. mg, ). Patients in the UG-TPVB group had better EORTC QLQ-C30 scores compared with patients in the general anesthesia with tracheal intubation group. The difference of length of hospitalization, hs-CRP, and IL-6 between two groups did not reach statistical difference (length of hospitalization 6.2 vs. 6.9 days, ; hs-CRP: vs. , ; and IL-6: vs. , ). Discussion. NSCLC patients undergoing lobectomy surgery who received UG-TPVB had less postoperative pain, used less dosage of tramadol hydrochloride, and had better QoL.

1. Introduction

Lung cancer is among the leading cause of cancer death among both genders, taking up 25% of all cancer death according to the American Cancer Society’s estimates for lung cancer in the United States for 2020 [1]. In general, around 13% of all lung cancers are small-cell lung cancer (SCLC), and around 84% are NSCLC. Surgery proves the best chance to recover from NSCLC. For most NSCLC patients undergoing surgery, the most commonly performed lung cancer surgery is lobectomy, which is the removal of the lobe of the lung that is affected by the tumor. Although general anesthesia with tracheal intubation is the most commonly used anesthetic method for NSCLC surgery, it has higher levels of inflammation and worse postoperative quality of life (QoL) compared with regional anesthesia [2]. Nerve block anesthesia such as thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) has the advantages of reducing postoperative anesthetic consumption and reducing the inflammatory response and better postoperative survival rate for NSCLC patients [3]. TPVB has been widely used for decades, which is the technique of injecting local anesthetic adjacent to the thoracic vertebra near the spinal nerves emerging from the intervertebral foramina [4]. Traditional TPVB utilizes thoracic spine and disappearance of penetration as landmarks of the puncture site. Ultrasound-guided TPVB (UG-TPVB) has more advantages, such as pleural and lung tissue visualization and real-time visualization of puncture needle and catheter placement, which is safer to perform and provides excellent prolonged analgesic effect.

Surgery provides the best chance for NSCLC patients to recover; however, lobectomy is a complex operation. In this surgery, the entire lobe including the tumors is removed. Surgery can cause serious consequences, such as pain and lower QoL. In a study of operable, stage I, NSCLC patients undergoing lobectomy, nearly half of the patients had grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events. 15% patients had grade 3 chest pain 15% and 7% had lung infections [5]. A clinical trial of 90 patients with resected NSCLC proved that UG-TPVB provided comparable levels of adequate analgesia for 24 hours after surgery and better analgesia after 12 hours. The UG-TPVB procedure could reduce the intraoperative fentanyl and postoperative morphine consumption [6]. The majority group of UG-TPVB did not need rescue morphine. Another study including 300 patients undergoing lung cancer resection using thoracotomy proved the opposite results. They concluded that using TPVB did not decrease the postoperative pain syndrome frequency [7]. Inconsistency about using UG-TPVB for NSCLC undergoing lobectomy still existed, and previous studies published no data about advantages of UG-TPVB on longitudinal postoperative pain in 24 hours, dosage of tramadol hydrochloride, inflammation, and QoL. Thus, our study is aimed at investigating the impact of UG-TPVB on postoperative pain using the numeric rating scale (NRS) score, dosage of tramadol hydrochloride 24 hours after surgery, postoperative inflammation levels using high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and QoL using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30).

2. Patients and Method

2.1. Study Design and Patients

In our study, we recruited patients aged between 52 and 75 years who were pathologically diagnosed of NSCLC at the Department of Anesthesiology, the Affiliated Huaian No.1 People’s Hospital of Nanjing Medical University. Patients in the UG-TPVB group received 20 ml 0.25% adjunctive with anesthesia bupivacaine, and patients in the control group received general anesthesia with tracheal intubation (each group has 50 patients). Patients got no postoperative analgesic device. The patients’ inclusion criterion was adult patients with pathological diagnosis of NSCLC undergoing lobectomy. Exclusion criteria were (1) patients diagnosed with another primary tumor within 2 years of recruitment, (2) patients with severe heart disease, uncontrolled cardiac arrhythmias, or hypertension, and (3) patients with cognitive impairment that make patients unlikely to be able to complete all study requirements. Patients’ baseline clinical characteristics including age, gender, type of pathology, primary tumor, regional lymph nodes, body mass index, albumin, and hs-CRP were taken at recruitment. Patient postoperative pain, dosage of tramadol hydrochloride, levels of inflammation, and QoL were recorded.

2.2. Postoperative Pain Record and Management

Patients’ postoperative pain scores were recorded using NRS. NRS is a pain scale that measures a patient’s pain intensity. It is an 11-point scale for patient-recorded pain. It is based on patients’ abilities to perform activities of daily living and can be used for adults and children more than 10 years old [8]. A rating 0 means no pain, 1-3 means mild pain, 4-6 means moderate pain, and 7-10 means severe pain. Patients were asked to give their NRS score 2 hours, 4 hours, 6 hours, 12 hours, and 24 hours postoperatively. When their score is ≥4, 50 mg tramadol hydrochloride was given intravenously for analgesia after patients’ permission. We recorded the amount of tramadol hydrochloride in 24 hours after surgery.

2.3. QoL Assessment

Patients’ QoL was assessed within 24 hours after surgery using the EORTC QLQ-C30. It is a patient-reported questionnaire developed for cancer clinical trials, clinical practice, and academic research. Patients need in average 10 minutes for finishing the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire. The questionnaire has 30 questions in three scales, functional scale, symptom scale, and global health status. Most items use a four-item scale, namely, “not at all,” “a little,” “quite a bit,” and “very much.” Raw scores are transformed to a 0-100 scale. A high scale score represents a higher response level [9].

2.4. High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein and IL-6 Level

All of the blood samples were collected into the standard tubes in the same room at a temperature range of 22 to 24°C. Hs-CRP and IL-6 were measured by an immunoturbidimetric assay following standard laboratory procedures at the Department of Clinical Chemistry, the Affiliated Huaian No.1 People’s Hospital of Nanjing Medical University.

2.5. Statistics

Descriptive statistical analyses of baseline characteristics were conducted for all continuous variables by mean values and standard deviations and categorical variables by counts (percentages). Comparisons of EORTC QLQ-C30 scores, NRS scores at 2 hours, 4 hours, 6 hours, 12 hours, and 24 hours after surgery, amount of tramadol hydrochloride dosage, hs-CRP, and IL-6 between UG-TPVB and general anesthesia with tracheal intubation subgroups were compared using Students’ -test. Longitudinal NRS scores were illustrated using a line chart. All analysis was performed using SPSS, version 16.0 (IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA), and was considered statistically significant.

3. Results

In total, 100 patients, all with unresectable NSCLC, consented to participate in the study from July 2017 to January 2019: 50 patients underwent UG-TPVB and 50 patients underwent general anesthesia with tracheal intubation. Baseline characteristics, such as gender, age, type of pathology, primary tumor (T stage), and regional lymph nodes (N stage), of the 100 patients are summarized in Table 1. Preoperative body mass index, albumin, and hs-CRP and IL-6 levels did not reach statistical difference between the two groups.

The postoperative NRS scores at 2 hours, 4 hours, 6 hours, 12 hours, and 24 hours were illustrated using a line chart in Figure 1. Patients in the UG-TPVB group has better NRS scores compared with the general anesthesia with tracheal intubation group. Although the patients’ NRS score at 2 hours, 4 hours, 6 hours, and 12 hours did not reach statistical difference, patients in the UG-TPVB group had lower postoperative NRS scores at 24 h (1.8 vs. 3.5, ). The average 24 h postoperative NRS score of the UG-TPVB group is lower than that of the general anesthesia with tracheal intubation (4.6 vs. 5.3, ). Patients in the UG-TPVB group received lower dosage of tramadol hydrochloride compared with patients in the general anesthesia with tracheal intubation group ( vs. mg, , Figure 2).

Figure 1

Patients’ postoperative numeric rating scale (NRS) score in 24 hours. Patients in the UG-TPVB group has better NRS scores compared with the general anesthesia with tracheal intubation group. Although patients’ NRS score at 2 hours, 4 hours, 6 hours, and 12 hours did not reach statistical difference, patients in the UG-TPVB group had lower postoperative NRS scores at 24 h (1.8 vs. 3.5, ). The average 24 h postoperative NRS score of the UG-TPVB group is lower than that of the general anesthesia with tracheal intubation (4.6 vs. 5.3, ).

Table 2 shows the EORTC QLQ-C30 scores after surgery for NSCLC patients in two groups. Patients in the UG-TPVB group had a better emotional functional scale ( vs. , ), less pain ( vs. , ), and less insomnia ( vs. , ). The other functional scales, symptom scales, and global health status between the two groups did not reach statistical difference.

The difference of length of hospitalization, hs-CRP, and IL-6 between two groups did not reach statistical difference (length of hospitalization 6.2 vs. 6.9 days, ; hs-CRP: vs. , ; and IL-6: vs. , ). However, patients in the UG-TPVB group had the tendency of shorter length of hospitalization and a lower level of hs-CRP level.

Thus, our data proved that in patients with NSCLC receiving UG-TPVB during lobectomy, the patient postoperative pain scores are decreased; patients had better QoL and had lower dosage of tramadol hydrochloride 24 hours after surgery. Patients receiving UG-TPVB tend to have shorter length of hospitalization and less inflammation compared with patients receiving general anesthesia with tracheal intubation.

4. Discussion

UG-TPVB is a safe analgesia procedure since ultrasound guidance is a recent technique that may offer several advantages. With the use of ultrasound (US), nerve block techniques are much safer, and a smaller dosage of local anesthesia is required [10]. Recent studies warrant the benefit of UG-TPVB [11]. TPVB is a technique which is easy to learn with a high success rate and a relatively low rate of serious complications like pneumothorax (0.5%) [12]. Previous study shows that paravertebral block has some benefits beyond providing analgesia [13]. Ultrasound-guided single injection TPVB gives effective postoperative analgesia in 24 hours after surgery [14]. In a study of 60 patients with the American Society of Anesthesiologists, status I and II undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy, the dose of intraoperative fentanyl, postoperative pethidine consumption, and the number of patients receiving pethidine were significantly lower in UG-TPVB groups compared to general anesthesia alone without any local anesthetic group (). Postoperative serum cortisol and blood glucose level showed a significant decrease in the UG-TPVB group compared with the general anesthesia group at 6 and 24 h postoperative (). The pain score by the visual analog scale and number of patients who experienced postoperative nausea and vomiting were significantly lower in the UG-TPVB group than patients in the general anesthesia group. Several studies proved that the postoperative pain score was significantly decreased in the TPVB group, and there was statistical significantly lower consumption of analgesic requirements compared with the general anesthesia group [15, 16]. Our study is in accordance with previous studies and provided further evidence that NSCLC patients undergoing lobectomy in the UG-TPVB group had less postoperative pain at 24 hours and received less tramadol hydrochloride dosage compared with patients receiving general anesthesia with tracheal intubation.

Our study is the first to evaluate the impact of UG-TPVB on postoperative QoL using the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire. Our study confirmed that NSCLC patients undergoing lobectomy in the UG-TPVB group had a better emotional functional scale, less pain, and less insomnia compared with patients in the general anesthesia with tracheal intubation group. Sleep disorders had a high degree of coexistence with pain. Actually, the majority of patients with postoperative pain suffers sleeping impairment, including insomnia [17, 18]. Interestingly, some studies proved that insomnia may not only cause pain but also enhance chronic pain [17–19]. Thus, insomnia and postoperative pain promote and alter the processing of each other. Not surprisingly, there is overlap between pain and sleep disorder. NSCLC patients undergoing lobectomy in the UG-TPVB also had higher chances of a better emotional functional scale, which includes anxiety, depression, and impulsivity. Many patients experienced depression after surgery. Ongoing health problems, worry about future relapse, discomfort, and change in routine all can contribute to emotional health issues. Research shows that mental health issues can negatively affect patients’ recovery after surgery [20]. Depression is a frequent cause of general morbidity in postoperative patients suffering from a wide range of complications. Also, depression after surgery can increase the perception or experience of postoperative pain [21]. Symptoms of emotional disorders include difficulty to make decisions, problems with memory, eating less or more than usual, sleeping disorders, loss of interest in activities, or feeling of despair or hopelessness with no specific reasons. Thus, contribution of UG-TPVB to pain, emotional scale, and insomnia may help recovery and needs to be further studied in larger clinical trials.

Patients in the UG-TPVB group had the tendency of shorter length of hospitalization and less inflammation. Severe inflammation is a condition that makes NSCLC patient recovery after surgery difficult. CRP is an acute phase protein that is regarded as one of the most commonly used clinical inflammatory marker used in routine practice [22]. Increased baseline or postoperative CRP levels could be used to test candidates of anti-inflammatory drugs. A hs-CRP test, which is more sensitive than a standard test, is a blood test that finds lower levels of CRP. A meta-analysis published in 2016 suggested that an increased baseline CRP level is associated with a statistically significant worse prognosis in lung cancer patients undergoing lobectomy [23]. A series of 1750 operable lung cancer patients who underwent complete resection proved that CRP levels at baseline and 3 days after surgery predict mortality [24]. IL-6 has been proved to be an inflammatory marker that predict poor survival for postoperative NSCLC patients [25]. We also tested the postoperative IL-6 level and found no statistical difference between two groups. Our results confirm the tendency of lower inflammation levels for NSCLC patients who underwent lobectomy in the UG-TPVB group. UG-TPVB has the tendency of reducing the length of hospital stay in NSCLC patients undergoing lobectomy.

Our study had several limitations. First, our study has a limited number of sample size, recruiting 100 patients. Second, patients were not blinded when they received UG-TPVB and needed to write informed consent. However, our study is the first to evaluate impact of UG-TPVB on longitudinal postoperative pain, QoL, inflammation, dosage of tramadol hydrochloride, and length of hospitalization in patients with NSCLC who underwent lobectomy. Further studies are needed in the field and trainings.

5. Conclusion

Use of UG-TPVB in NSCLC patients receiving lobectomy provided good postoperative analgesia and decreased the dose of tramadol hydrochloride used, with great safety and better QoL.

Data Availability

Data are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Ethical Approval

The studies involving human subjects were reviewed and approved by the Medical Ethics Review Committee of the Affiliated Huaian No.1 People’s Hospital of Nanjing Medical University.

All patients who participated in this study provided written informed consent during the study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Authors’ Contributions

Shouxiang Xie designed the study, Cuijuan Zheng collected data and did the analysis, and Cuijuan Zheng and Jiayu Wang drafted the manuscript. All authors read and agreed to the final manuscript.

Acknowledgments

We thank all doctors and nurses who took part in the study in the Department of Emergency and Department of Anesthesiology of the Affiliated Huaian No.1 People’s Hospital of Nanjing Medical University.

References

R. L. Siegel, K. D. Miller, and A. Jemal, “Cancer statistics, 2020,” CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, vol. 70, no. 1, pp. 7–30, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
O. Perez-Gonzalez, L. F. Cuellar-Guzman, J. Soliz, and J. P. Cata, “Impact of regional anesthesia on recurrence, metastasis, and immune response in breast cancer surgery: a systematic review of the literature,” Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, vol. 42, no. 6, pp. 751–756, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. K. Lee, H. J. Ahn, J. I. Zo, K. Kim, D. M. Jung, and J. H. Park, “Paravertebral block does not reduce cancer recurrence, but is related to higher overall survival in lung cancer surgery: a retrospective cohort study,” Anesthesia and Analgesia, vol. 125, no. 4, pp. 1322–1328, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. D’Ercole, H. Arora, and P. A. Kumar, “Paravertebral block for thoracic surgery,” Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 915–927, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Y. Chang, S. Senan, M. A. Paul et al., “Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy versus lobectomy for operable stage I non- small-cell lung cancer: a pooled analysis of two randomised trials,” The Lancet Oncology, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 630–637, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. S. Saad, S. Y. El Baradie, M. A. W. Abdel Aliem, M. M. Ali, and T. A. M. Kotb, “Ultrasound-guided serratus anterior plane block versus thoracic paravertebral block for perioperative analgesia in thoracotomy,” Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 565–570, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. Khoronenko, D. Baskakov, M. Leone et al., “Influence of regional anesthesia on the rate of chronic postthoracotomy pain syndrome in lung cancer patients,” Annals of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 180–186, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. M. Alfonsin, R. Chapon, C. A. B. de Souza, V. K. Genro, M. M. C. Mattia, and J. S. Cunha-Filho, “Correlations among algometry, the visual analogue scale, and the numeric rating scale to assess chronic pelvic pain in women,” European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology: X, vol. 3, article 100037, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. M. Hassen, G. Taye, M. Gizaw, and F. M. Hussien, “Quality of life and associated factors among patients with breast cancer under chemotherapy at Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia,” PLoS One, vol. 14, no. 9, article e0222629, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Blichfeldt-Lauridsen and B. D. Hansen, “Anesthesia and myasthenia gravis,” Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 17–22, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. N. Tavare, N. J. Perry, L. L. Benzonana, M. Takata, and D. Ma, “Cancer recurrence after surgery: direct and indirect effects of anesthetic agents,” International Journal of Cancer, vol. 130, no. 6, pp. 1237–1250, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Naja and P. A. Lonnqvist, “Somatic paravertebral nerve blockade Incidence of failed block and complications,” Anaesthesia, vol. 56, no. 12, pp. 1181–1201, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Kuş, U. H. Yörükoğlu, C. Aksu, S. Çınar, N. Z. Cantürk, and Y. Gürkan, “The effect of thoracic paravertebral block on seroma reduction in breast surgery - a randomized controlled trial,” Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology, vol. 70, no. 3, pp. 215–219, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Kuş, Y. Gürkan, Z. Arslan et al., “Our ultrasound-guided paravertebral block experiences in thoracic surgery,” Ağrı - The Journal of The Turkish Society of Algology, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 139–142, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. E. Chelly, T. Ploskanych, F. Dai, and J. B. Nelson, “Multimodal analgesic approach incorporating paravertebral blocks for open radical retropubic prostatectomy: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study,” Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, vol. 58, no. 4, pp. 371–378, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Paleczny, P. Zipser, and M. Pysz, “Paravertebral block for open cholecystectomy,” Anestezjologia Intensywna Terapia, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 89–93, 2009.
View at: Google Scholar
P. J. Quartana, E. M. Wickwire, B. Klick, E. Grace, and M. T. Smith, “Naturalistic changes in insomnia symptoms and pain in temporomandibular joint disorder: a cross-lagged panel analysis,” Pain, vol. 149, no. 2, pp. 325–331, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. V. Vitiello, B. Rybarczyk, M. Von Korff, and E. J. Stepanski, “Cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia improves sleep and decreases pain in older adults with co-morbid insomnia and osteoarthritis,” Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 355–362, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. Raymond, T. A. Nielsen, G. Lavigne, C. Manzini, and M. Choiniere, “Quality of sleep and its daily relationship to pain intensity in hospitalized adult burn patients,” Pain, vol. 92, no. 3, pp. 381–388, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. M. Ghoneim and M. W. O’Hara, “Depression and postoperative complications: an overview,” BMC Surgery, vol. 16, no. 1, p. 5, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Suffeda, W. Meissner, J. Rosendahl, and O. Guntinas-Lichius, “Influence of depression, catastrophizing, anxiety, and resilience on postoperative pain at the first day after otolaryngological surgery: a prospective single center cohort observational study,” Medicine, vol. 95, no. 28, article e4256, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Shrotriya, D. Walsh, N. Bennani-Baiti, S. Thomas, and C. Lorton, “C-reactive protein is an important biomarker for prognosis tumor recurrence and treatment response in adult solid tumors: a systematic review,” PLoS One, vol. 10, no. 12, article e0143080, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Leuzzi, C. Galeone, M. Gisabella et al., “Baseline C-reactive protein level predicts survival of early-stage lung cancer: evidence from a systematic review and meta-analysis,” Tumori, vol. 102, no. 5, pp. 441–449, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
U. Pastorino, D. Morelli, G. Leuzzi et al., “Baseline and postoperative C-reactive protein levels predict mortality in operable lung cancer,” European Journal of Cancer, vol. 79, pp. 90–97, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Qu, F. Sun, J. Zhou, L. Li, S. D. Shapiro, and G. Xiao, “Interleukin-6 prevents the initiation but enhances the progression of lung cancer,” Cancer Research, vol. 75, no. 16, pp. 3209–3215, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2021 Cuijuan Zheng et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

445

Downloads

1124

Citations