Biochemistry Research International

Biochemistry Research International / 2019 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2019 |Article ID 4164576 |

Joseph Nana Gyesi, Rita Opoku, Lawrence Sheringham Borquaye, "Chemical Composition, Total Phenolic Content, and Antioxidant Activities of the Essential Oils of the Leaves and Fruit Pulp of Annona muricata L. (Soursop) from Ghana", Biochemistry Research International, vol. 2019, Article ID 4164576, 9 pages, 2019.

Chemical Composition, Total Phenolic Content, and Antioxidant Activities of the Essential Oils of the Leaves and Fruit Pulp of Annona muricata L. (Soursop) from Ghana

Academic Editor: Gary Lorigan
Received04 Jun 2019
Revised16 Jul 2019
Accepted17 Jul 2019
Published02 Sep 2019


Annona muricata, also called soursop, is widespread in many tropical countries, and various parts of the plant have been shown to possess very good pharmacological properties. This work evaluated the chemical composition and antioxidant activities of essential oils obtained from the fruit pulp and leaves of soursop. Essential oils were obtained via hydrodistillation and characterized by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Antioxidant potential was evaluated via the phosphomolybdenum, hydrogen peroxide scavenging, and 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) free radical scavenging assays. In the leaf essential oil, a total of 31 compounds were identified with δ-cadinene (22.58%) and α-muurolene (10.64%) being the most abundant. Thirty-two compounds were identified in the fruit pulp essential oil with Ç-sitosterol (19.82%) and 2-hydroxy-1-(hydroxymethyl) ethyl ester (13.48%) being present in high amounts. Both essential oils showed very good total antioxidant capacities (49.03 gAAE/100 g and 50.88 gAAE/100 g for fruit pulp and leaf essential oils, respectively). The IC50 values from the DPPH assay were 244.8 ± 3.2 μg/mL for leaf essential oil and 512 ± 5.1 μg/mL for the fruit pulp essential oil. At 1 mg/mL, hydrogen peroxide scavenged was below 50% for both leaf and fruit pulp essential oils, indicating moderate activity. These results suggest possible application of the essential oils of Annona muricata in food preservation and processing.

1. Introduction

Antioxidants have garnered a lot of attention in recent times due to their potential in the prevention and treatment of radical-mediated diseases. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) and reactive nitrogen species (RNS) provide oxidative radicals which interact with and damage macromolecules such as proteins, lipids, and DNA [13]. Oxidative damage to these macromolecules has been implicated in a number of human pathological processes such as diabetes, pulmonary dysfunction, atherosclerosis, and neurological diseases [46]. Lipid oxidation also plays a critical role in the food industry. Reduction in food quality and loss of nutritional value are associated with the oxidative degradation of lipids [7]. To ameliorate the effects of radicals, various compounds have been explored. Compounds such as butylated hydroxyanisole (BHA) or butylhydroxytoluene (BHT) are commonly used in the food industry as antioxidants [8]. These synthetic compounds are, however, suspected to have harmful effects on human health, and their use is therefore discouraged [9, 10]. Some of the synthetic antioxidants (such as α-tocopherol and BHT) exhibit poor activities in complex food systems [11] and foods enriched with long chain omega-3 fatty acids [12]. Natural antioxidants with low toxicities have therefore been the focus of many research works. One class of natural products that have shown promise in this regard is essential oils [13].

Essential oils are aromatic, oily liquids made up of mixtures of volatile compounds obtained usually via hydrodistillation, steam distillation, dry distillation, or a mechanical process without the application of heat from a plant or a plant part. They usually possess a strong odor, are seldom colored, and are generally lower in density relative to water. Essential oils have been isolated from all plant organs such as flowers, buds, seeds, leaves, twigs, bark, herbs, wood, fruits, and root [14, 15]. The use of essential oils for their beneficial human properties has been in existence since antiquity and is documented in primordial literature [16, 17]. Some of these properties of essential oils such as anti-inflammatory, antimicrobial, and antioxidant have been verified in the recent scientific literature [14, 1820]. The oxidative stability of essential oils stems largely from the enormous diversity of compounds that constitute these oils [18]. Several essential oils are known to possess very good antioxidant capabilities, and this can be utilized in the protection of other substances, like food and animal feed preservation. Animal products (egg, meat, and fat) with improved dietary value, better oxidative stability, and longer shelf life may be obtained by using essential oils as additives in feedstuffs for farm animals [21].

Annona muricata L. (Annonaceae), also called soursop, is a tropical plant found in parts of the Americas, Asia, Australia, and Africa. It possesses thick leaves that are shiny on the upper side. The leaves are obovate, oblate, and acuminate to varying degrees. The soursop fruit is dark green, prickly, and ovoid with juicy, acidic, whitish, and aromatic pulp [22, 23]. The use of Annona muricata in traditional medicine is well documented. Ethnobotanical studies have described the plant as being used to treat various disease conditions like bacterial infections, fever, respiratory and skin illness, diabetes, internal and external parasites, hypertension, inflammation, pain, and cancer [22]. Extracts of the plant have been shown to possess antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, antiprotozoan, antioxidant, and antitumor characteristics. In vivo studies of the plant extracts has revealed wound healing, antiulceric, hepatoprotective, anxiolytic, contraceptive, antistress, hypoglycemic, anti-inflammatory, antitumoral, and anti-icteric activities. Over 200 compounds have been isolated from the plant with most being alkaloids, phenols, and acetogenins [22]. Some acetogenins and alkaloids isolated from the plant have shown neurotoxicity [2224].

Essential oils from various parts of Annona muricata have been the subject of a number of investigations. Essential oils have been isolated from different organs of the plant such as fruit pulp, leaves, and fruit peel as well as plants from different locations in Africa, Asia, and the Americas [2537]. Interestingly, for the same plant part, differences in the chemical composition of the essential oils have been observed. This motivated this work on Annona muricata from Ghana. The present work describes the composition of essential oils from the leaves and fruit pulp of Ghanaian cultivars of Annona muricata. In addition, the antioxidant activities of the essential oils were evaluated.

2. Methods

2.1. Plant Material

Fresh fruits of Annona muricata L. were purchased from the local market in Kumasi, Ghana. Fresh leaves were collected from a farm at Ayeduase in Kumasi. Plant identification and authentication were carried out at the Herbarium Section of the Department of Theoretical and Applied Biology, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology (KNUST), Kumasi.

2.2. Isolation of Volatile Compounds

The pulp of the fresh fruit was separated from the peel and seed and 680 g of the pulp placed in a hydrodistillation apparatus. The setup for hydrodistillation consisted of a modified Clavenger glassware, a condenser, a round bottom flask, a heating mantle, and a receiving flask as described elsewhere. After 4 hours of distillation, 780 mg (0.11%) of essential oil was obtained. Similarly, 120 g of fresh leaves was placed in the hydrodistillation apparatus, and after 4 hours of distillation, 800 mg (∼0.67%) of essential oil was obtained.

2.3. Gas Chromatography Analysis

Gas chromatography-mass spectrometer (GC-MS) analysis of the essential oils from fruit pulp and leaves were performed using a gas chromatograph (PerkinElmer GC Clarus 580) interfaced to a PerkinElmer mass spectrometer (Clarus SQ 8 S) equipped with Elite-5MS (5% diphenyl/95% dimethyl poly siloxane) fused capillary column (30 × 0.25 mm ID × 0.25 μm DF). At first, the oven temperature was maintained at 35°C for 2 minutes, and then it was ramped up to 250°C at a rate of 10°C/minute and finally to 320°C at a rate of 20°C/minute where it was held for 23 minutes. For mass spectrometer detection, an electron ionization system was operated in the electron impact mode. Helium was used as a carrier gas at a constant flow rate of 1 mL/minute, and an injection volume of 1 μL was employed. The injector temperature was maintained at 250°C, and the ion-source temperature was kept at 150°C. Mass spectra were taken at 70 eV and a scan interval of 0.5 seconds over a mass range of 50 to 450 Da. The solvent delay was 0 to 4 minutes, and the total GC/MS run time was 50 minutes. Constituents were identified by comparison of their retention indices relative to n-alkanes and fragmentation pattern from mass spectra, which were compared to the mass spectra in the database of National Institute Standard and Technology (NIST) and published literature of spectral data whenever possible. The assigned compound names were made solely by using the similarity indices obtained from the Wiley and NIST libraries for the GC-MS system used and some published literature of spectral data. The relative percentages of the various constituents were expressed as percentages calculated by normalization of the peak area [38, 39].

2.4. Evaluation of Antioxidant Activities

Antioxidant potential of essential oils and hydrosols was evaluated by different in vitro assays; the phosphomolybdenum assay, hydrogen peroxide scavenging assay, and the 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radical scavenging assay. All chemicals used for the antioxidant activity evaluations were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA).

2.4.1. Phosphomolybdenum (PM) Assay

The assay relies on the reduction of Mo (VI) to Mo (V) by the analyte of interest followed by the subsequent formation of a green phosphate/Mo (V) complex at acidic pH [40]. Five milliliters of the PM reagent (0.6 M sulphuric acid, 28 mM sodium phosphate, and 4 mM ammonium molybdate) was added to 0.5 mL of each test sample in a test tube. The test tubes were capped and shaken and then incubated at 95°C for 90 minutes. After samples had cooled to room temperature, absorbance was taken at 695 nm against a blank solution. Blank solution was made by replacing the test sample with solvent in the mixture and incubated under similar conditions. Ascorbic acid was used as the standard. Antioxidant capacity was expressed as equivalents of ascorbic acid with the following equation:where TAC is the total antioxidant capacity in gAAE/100 g of the test sample, C is the concentration of ascorbic acid (μg/mL), V is the volume of the reaction mixture, and M is the mass of the essential oil in the reaction mixture.

2.4.2. Hydrogen Peroxide Scavenging Assay

This method is based on the ability of 1,10-phenanthroline to form an orange complex with ferrous ion and the reduction of ferrous ion to ferric ion by hydrogen peroxide [41]. To 0.5 mL ferrous ammonium sulphate (1 mM) solution was added 3 mL of varying concentrations of essential oil (prepared in 5% DMSO) and 0.13 mL of 5 mM H2O2. The samples were incubated at room temperature away from light for 5 minutes. Thereafter, 3 mL 1,10-phenanthroline (1 mM) was added to each tube, mixed well and incubated again at room temperature for 10 minutes. The absorbance of each reaction mixture was taken at 510 nm using UV-Vis spectrophotometer. Water was used in place of essential oil for the blank solution. Percent hydrogen peroxide scavenged was calculated from the following equationwhere Atest is the absorbance of the test sample and Acontrol is the absorbance of the blank.

2.4.3. DPPH Assay

The DPPH radical scavenging activity of the essential oils was evaluated using slightly modified standard methods. Essential oils of different concentrations were prepared in 5% DMSO. A solution of DPPH (0.1 mM) was prepared in methanol. To 40 μL of essential oil was added 160 μL of DPPH solution. The reaction mixture was thoroughly mixed together and incubated in the dark at room temperature for 30 minutes. Thereafter, the absorbance of the mixture was read at 517 nm. For the reaction blank, methanol was used in the place of essential oils. Ascorbic acid was used as the positive control. The percent DPPH radical scavenged was calculated from the following equation:where Acontrol is the absorbance of blank and Asample is the absorbance of sample mixture [42, 43].

2.4.4. Total Phenolic Content (Folin–Ciocalteu Method)

This method is based on the oxidation of phenolic groups by using Folin–Ciocalteu’s reagent. To 5 mL of 10% Folin–Ciocalteu reagent was added 1 mL of sample solution of varying concentrations. The mixture was thoroughly mixed and allowed to stand for 5 minutes at room temperature. After this, 4 mL of 7% NaHCO3 was added slowly and the reaction mixture was allowed to stand in the dark for 30 minutes at room temperature. Absorbance readings were taken at 765 nm. The same procedure was repeated for all standard gallic acid solutions. The phenolic content was obtained from the gallic acid calibration curve and expressed as grams of gallic acid equivalent per 100 gram of dry weight of sample (gGAE/100 g) [39].

2.4.5. Data Analysis

All experiments were conducted in triplicates and data presented as mean ± standard deviation. Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism 6.0 for Windows (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA). Where necessary, significance was evaluated using analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Sidak’s multiple comparison test at .

3. Results

The essential oils from the leaf and fruit pulp of Annona muricata were obtained by hydrodistillation in a Clavenger-type set up. For the fruit pulp, an amber-colored oil, representing a yield of 0.11%, was obtained after concentration in vacuo. A light yellow oil was obtained from the hydrodistillation of fresh leaves of Annona muricata, with a yield of 0.67%.

The total ion chromatogram (TIC) obtained from the GC-MS analysis of the essential oils are presented in Figure 1 (fruit pulp) and Figure 2 (leaf). For the leaf essential oil, 31 compounds representing 99.98% of the constituents were identified (Table 1), whereas 32 compounds, representing 99.99%, were identified in the fruit pulp essential oil (Table 2). There was marked difference in the chemical composition of the two oils. Whereas the leaf essential oils consisted largely of terpenes and terpenoids, the fruit pulp essential oils were made up of aliphatic compounds (acids, esters, and alcohols). The sesquiterpenes, δ-cadinene (22.58%), and α-muurolene (10.64%) were the most abundant compounds identified in the leaf essential oils. The diterpenoid, andrographolide, was also present in large amounts with a composition of 6.51%. τ-cadinol, ledene oxide (II), α-cardinol, and β-caryophyllene completed the top six most abundant compounds in the leaf essential oils. 3-(Octadecyloxy) propyl ester (5.57%) and octadecane (5.33%) were the most abundant aliphatic compounds present in the leaf essential oil. Gitoxigenin, a phytosterol, was also present. D-limonene and α-pinene, both monoterpenes, were also identified in the leaf essential oil. α-pinene was present in the lowest concentration, making up only 0.04% of the total composition.

No.RTSICompound% composition

17.1687α-Pinene, (D)-0.04
28.8796Limonene, (D)-0.25
311.5998Methyl (9E)-9-octadecen-12-ynoate0.36
1014.8498Ledene oxide (II)6.29
1816.0196Caryophyllene oxide1.15
2116.91942-Hexadecen-1-ol, 3,7,11,15-tetramethyl0.39
2319.3096Methyl 10,12-pentacosadiynoate1.99
2720.149616-Octadecenoic acid, methyl ester0.26
2820.26953-(Octadecyloxy) propyl ester5.57
Oxygenated terpenes (terpenoids)34.24

No., compound number in order of elution; SI, Similarity Index (library search of purity value of a compound); RT, retention time in minutes.

No.RTSICompound% composition

26.9698Hexanoic acid methyl ester1.86
37.74962-Hexenoic acid, methyl ester10.27
48.1194Pentanoic acid, 2-hydroxy-4-methyl-, methyl ester0.03
58.1898Pentanoic acid, 2-hydroxy-3-methyl-, methyl ester0.42
710.02991,6-Octadien-3-ol, 3,7-dimethyl-0.13
811.12942-Octenoic acid, methyl ester, (E)-0.48
1214.31972-Propenoic acid, 3-phenyl-, methyl ester8.67
1720.5494Hexadecanoic acid, methyl ester0.33
1822.2694Glyceryl 2-laurate1.52
1922.31999-Octadecenoic acid, methyl ester, (E)-2.18
2025.07978-Octadecanoic acid2.20
2125.08992-Hydroxy-1-(hydroxymethyl) ethyl ester13.48
2326.44949-Octadecanoic acid4.59
2426.4496Pentadecanoic acid, 13-methyl-, methyl ester0.42
2526.93802,3-Dihydroxypropyl elaidate3.81
2827.2899Oleic acid2.00
3232.4499Oleyl oleate2.53
Carboxylic acid8.79

No., compound number in order of elution; SI, Similarity Index (library search of purity value of a compound); RT, retention time in minutes.

The essential oil from the fruit pulp was made up of mainly aliphatic compounds and phytosterols. The most abundant compound was the phytosterol, ς-sitosterol, which made up 19.82% of the essential oil. Aliphatic compounds like 2-hydroxy-1-(hydroxymethyl) ethyl ester (13.48%), 2-hexenoic acid, methyl ester (10.27%), 2-propenoic acid, 3-phenyl-, methyl ester (8.67%), and 9-octadecanoic acid (4.59%) were also present in high amounts. Terpene compounds identified in the essential oil were squalene (a triterpene) and the sesquiterpenes, 4,5-di-epi-aristolochene and β-guaiene. Other phytosterols present were α-sitosterol (3.04%), γ-sitosterol (4.96%), and campesterol (2.19%). A number of straight-chain alkanes such as nonane, dodecane, and tridecane were also present in varying amounts. Phenylacetaldehyde was the only aldehyde identified in the essential oil from the fruit pulp of Annona muricata.

The antioxidant activities of the essential oils were determined using the phosphomolybdenum assay and DPPH and H2O2 scavenging assays. The total phenolic content of the oils was also determined. The total antioxidant capacity, as determined from the phosphomolybdenum assay, was 49.03 gAAE/100 g and 50.88 gAAE/100 g for fruit pulp and leaf essential oils, respectively (Table 3). There was no significant difference () between the antioxidant capacities of both the leaf and fruit pulp essential oils. The leaf essential oil proved to be a better scavenger of the DPPH radical than the fruit pulp essential oil. The IC50 for the leaf essential oil was 244.8 ± 3.2 μg/mL whereas that for the fruit pulp was 512 ± 5.1 μg/mL (Table 4). At 1.0 mg/mL, the fruit pulp essential oil scavenged about 24% of H2O2 while the leaf essential oil scavenged about 32% of H2O2 at 1 mg/mL (Table 4). The leaf essential oil thus proved to be a better H2O2 scavenger than the fruit pulp essential oil. In terms of phenolic content, there were more phenolic compounds in the leaf essential oil than there was in the fruit pulp essential oil (Table 3).

SampleTAC gAAE/100 gTPC gGAE/100 g

Pulp essential oil49.03 ± 0.48a3.98 ± 0.60b
Leaf essential oil50.88 ± 0.50a4.38 ± 0.42b

Columns with different letters indicate significant difference (, Sidak’s multiple comparison test). TAC expressed in gram ascorbic acid equivalent per 100 g of sample (gAAE/100 g). TPC expressed in gram gallic acid equivalent per 100 g of sample (gGAE/100 g).

SampleIC50 (μg/mL)% H2O2 scavenged

Pulp essential oil512.0 ± 5.124.38 ± 0.21
Leaf essential oil244.8 ± 3.231.80 ± 0.51
Ascorbic acid21.3 ± 3.2ND
Gallic acidND95.00 ± 1.12

IC50, concentration of extract required to scavenge 50% of DPPH radicals. % H2O2 scavenged was determined at 1 mg/mL for essential oils. For gallic acid, % H2O2 scavenged was determined at 50 μg/mL.

4. Discussions

The yield of the essential oils obtained in this work was in a similar range to that obtained from Annona muricata by other researchers. In general, essential oil yields are less than 1%. The fruit pulp produced a slighter higher yield than the leaves in this study. Different plant organs produce different amounts/levels of essential oils, and this usually reflects the function of the oils in that plant organ.

The leaf essential oils were mainly terpenes, whereas the pulp essential oils were made up of aliphatic compounds and sterols, similar to other results in the literature [2830, 33]. The most abundant component of the leaf essential oil was δ-cadinene. This compound has been identified in the leaf essential oils of Annona muricata from other locations as shown in Table 5 [27, 29, 32, 33]. Other works on the leaf essential oils of Annona muricata (Table 5) showed that β-caryophyllene was the major constituent [27, 29, 33]. Even though present in the leaf essential oil from Ghana, β-caryophyllene was not the most abundant constituent. Other sesquiterpenes and terpenoids such α-muurolene, τ-cadinol, α-cadinol, and α-humulene present were common to this study and results from other works (Table 5).

SourceLocationConstituents (% composition)

Present findingsGhanaδ-Cadinene (22.58), α-muurolene (10.64), andrographolide (6.51), τ-cadinol (6.47), ledene oxide (II) (6.29), α-cadinol (5.65), β-caryophyllene (5.57),
[33]Cote d’Ivoireβ-Caryophyllene (31.4), δ-cadinene (6.7), α-muurolene (5.5), (E)-2-hexenol (4.8), τ-cadinol (4.3)
[29]Beninβ-Caryophyllene (13.6), δ-cadinene (9.1), epi-α-cadinol (8.4), α-cadinol (8.3), isocaryophyllene (7.5)
[32]Nigeria(E)-Caryophyllene (38.9), eugenol (30.2), δ-cadinene (6.0), caryophyllene oxide (5.0), α-humulene (4.3)
[35]Vietnamβ-Pinene (20.6), germacrene D (18.1), p-mentha-2,4(8)-diene (9.8), α-pinene (9.4), β-elemene (9.1)
[27]Cameroonβ-Caryophyllene (40), β-elemene (14.4), α-santalene (9.5), (Z)-hex-3-enol (5.2), δ-cardinene (4.8)
[26]EgyptBicycloelemene (23.6), limonene (16.6), β-pinene (14.3), α-fenchene (6.6), α-pinene (5.4)

Fruit pulp
Present findingsGhanaÇ-Sitosterol (19.82), 2-hydroxy-1-(hydroxymethyl) ethyl ester (13.48), 2-hexenoic acid, methyl ester (10.27), 2-propenoic acid, 3-phenyl-, methyl ester (8.67), ϒ-sitosterol (4.96)
[36]MalaysiaMethyl (E)-2-butenoate (19.70), Methyl (E)-2-hexenoate (18.40), (Z)-3-hexenol (9.7), linalool (9.30), methyl 2-hydroxyhexanoate (5.2)
[33]Cote d’IvoireMethyl (E)-2-hexenoate (39.8), 3-pyridinocarbonylhydrazide (7.8) methyl hexanoate (5.4), methyl (E)-2-butenoate (4.8), 2,3-dihydrobenzofuran (4.5)
[34]CubaMethyl 3-phenyl-2-propenoate (10.6), hexadecanoic acid (9.7), methyl (E)-2-hexenoate (8.8), methyl 2-hydroxy-4-methylvalerate (7.2), linalool (2.9)
[30]Sri LankaMethyl hexanoate (30.95), methyl (E)-hex-2-enoate (26.70), trans-β-farnesene (6.45), dichloromethane (5.72), methyl but-2-enoate (4.75)
[28]Cameroon2-Hexenoic acid methyl ester (23.9), β-caryophyllene (12.7), 1,8-cineole (9.9), 2-hexenoic acid ethyl ester (8.6), linalool (7.8)

For the fruit pulp essential oils, Ç-sitosterol, a plant steroidal hormone necessary for some physiological processes such as cell elongation and cellulose biosynthesis [44], was identified as the most abundant component. Campesterol, another phytosterol with similar functions as sitosterol, was also identified in the fruit essential oils. In general, however, majority of the components identified in the fruit essential oils were aliphatic compounds made up of esters, alkanes, alcohols, aldehydes, and fatty acids. 2-Hexenoic acid, methyl ester (or methyl-2-hexenoate) which was present in this study as the 2nd most abundant constituent, was present in the pulp essential oils from other locations [28, 30, 33, 34]. The levels were however different. Variations in essential oil composition from the same plant organ may be due to a variety of factors. Seasonal variations in chemical composition of essential oils have been reported in the literature. This difference in chemical composition due to seasonal variations has been observed to affect the bioactivity of the essential oils as well [45, 46]. Other reasons for differences in the chemical composition of essential oils from the same plant organ include environmental and genetic factors, geographical variations, chemotypic diversity, plant maturation stage, and nutritional status of the plant [4649]. Thus, two plants of the same species but different chemotypes will produce essential oils with variations in chemical composition. The differences in essential oil compositions of Annona muricata leaf and fruit pulp in this and other works may be attributed to one or any combination of these elements.

The antioxidant potential of the leaf and fruit pulp essential oils, as evaluated from the phosphomolybdenum, DPPH scavenging, and hydrogen peroxide assays, revealed promising antioxidant properties (Tables 3 and 4). The mechanism of antioxidant activity includes prevention of the formation of the initiator radical and termination of radicals in the chain propagation stage or via indirect routes such as enhancement of the activities of enzymes that mop up reactive species or induction in the expression of these enzymes [18, 50]. Because essential oils consist of a number of different compounds, the antioxidant activity observed is usually the synergistic effect of the various constituents [18]. In the DPPH radical scavenging assay, a dose-dependent inhibition of the DPPH radical was observed in essential oil and standard ascorbic acid treatments. The IC50 values obtained for the leaf and fruit pulp essential oils indicate a good inhibition of the DPPH radical. In the hydrogen peroxide scavenging assay, the leaf essential oil showed superior activity to the pulp essential oil. The activity of both essential oils could however be described as average as the percent inhibition of hydrogen peroxide was less than 50% for both oils.

Both essential oils, however, displayed very good total antioxidant activity, as seen in Table 3. Both oils had high levels of phenolic content, and this may have contributed to the antioxidant activities observed. It has been postulated that phenolic compounds possess high reactivity towards peroxyl radicals via a formal hydrogen atom transfer, and this is the basis of their antioxidant activity [18, 51]. Phenolic compounds are therefore categorized as chain breaking antioxidants [52]. Many reports on the antioxidant potential of essential oils exist [13], and this report further confirms the importance of essential oils as antioxidative agents. Since reactive oxygen species cause serious damage to nucleic acids, proteins, and lipids, the impressive antioxidant activity of the essential oils from Annona muricata suggests possible use as natural antioxidant source in food additives and animal feed formulation.

5. Conclusion

Sesquiterpenes were the major constituents of the leaf essential oils of Annona muricata from Ghana, whereas the fruit pulp essential oil consisted of aliphatic compounds and sterols. The most abundant compound in leaf essential oil was δ-cadinene. In the fruit pulp essential oil, Ç-sitosterol was most abundant. Both essential oils displayed promising antioxidant activities and suggests potential application in food processing and preservation as well as cosmetic and pharmaceutical industries.

Data Availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

Conflicts of Interest

All authors declare no competing financial, professional, or personal interests that might have influenced the performance or presentation of this work.

Authors’ Contributions

LSB conceived the study. LSB, JNG, and RO designed all experiments. LSB, JNG, and RO collected the samples. JNG and RO carried out all the experiments. LSB, JNG, and RO performed the data analysis. JNG drafted and LSB edited the initial manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. JNG and RO contributed equally to this work.


The authors are grateful to the Department of Chemistry and the KNUST Central Laboratory for the use of their facilities for this study. The authors acknowledge Miss Judith Anane of KNUST for technical support.


  1. Y.-Z. Fang, S. Yang, and G. Wu, “Free radicals, antioxidants, and nutrition,” Nutrition, vol. 18, no. 10, pp. 872–879, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. L. Lyras, N. J. Cairns, A. Jenner, J. Peter, and B. Halliwell, “An assessment of oxidative damage to proteins, lipids, and DNA in brain from patients with Alzheimer’s disease,” Journal of Neurochemistry, vol. 68, no. 5, pp. 2061–2069, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  3. L. J. Machlin and A. Bendich, “Free radical tissue damage: protective role of antioxidant nutrients,” FASEB Journal, vol. 1, no. 6, pp. 441–445, 1987. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. B. Halliwell, “Lipid peroxidation, antioxidants and cardiovascular disease: how should we move forward?” Cardiovascular Research, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 410–418, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. P. Poprac, K. Jomova, M. Simunkova, V. Kollar, C. J. Rhodes, and M. Valko, “Targeting free radicals in oxidative stress-related human diseases,” Trends in Pharmacological Sciences, vol. 38, no. 7, pp. 592–607, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. K. Yagi, “Lipid peroxides and human diseases,” Chemistry and Physics of Lipids, vol. 45, no. 2–4, pp. 337–351, 1987. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. K. H. S. Farvin and C. Jacobsen, “Phenolic compounds and antioxidant activities of selected species of seaweeds from Danish coast,” Food Chemistry, vol. 138, no. 2-3, pp. 1670–1681, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  8. E. R. Sherwin, “Antioxidants,” Food Additives, vol. 139–193, 1990. View at: Google Scholar
  9. R. S. Lanigan and T. A. Yamarik, “Final report on the safety assessment of BHT (1),” International Journal of Toxicology, vol. 21, pp. 19–94, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  10. R. C. Lindenschmidt, A. F. Tryka, M. E. Goad, and H. P. Witschi, “The effects of dietary butylated hydroxytoluene on liver and colon tumor development in mice,” Toxicology, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 151–160, 1986. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. Y. He and F. Shahidi, “Antioxidant activity of green tea and its catechins in a fish meat model system,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 45, no. 11, pp. 4262–4266, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. C. Jacobsen, M. B. Let, N. S. Nielsen, and A. S. Meyer, “Antioxidant strategies for preventing oxidative flavour deterioration of foods enriched with N-3 polyunsaturated lipids: a comparative evaluation,” Trends in Food Science & Technology, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 76–93, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. A. K. Dhakad, V. V. Pandey, S. Beg, J. M. Rawat, and A. Singh, “Biological, medicinal and toxicological significance of Eucalyptus leaf essential oil: a review,” Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, vol. 98, no. 3, pp. 833–848, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. M. G. Miguel, “Antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities of essential oils: a short review,” Molecules, vol. 15, no. 12, pp. 9252–9287, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. P. Rubiolo, B. Sgorbini, E. Liberto, C. Cordero, and C. Bicchi, “Essential oils and volatiles: sample preparation and analysis. A review,” Flavour and Fragrance Journal, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 282–290, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. K. Husnu Can Baser and G. Buchbauer, Handbook of Essential Oils: Science, Technology, and Applications, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2015.
  17. H. S. Elshafie and I. Camele, “An overview of the biological effects of some mediterranean essential oils on human health,” BioMed Research International, vol. 2017, Article ID 9268468, 14 pages, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. R. Amorati, M. C. Foti, and L. Valgimigli, “Antioxidant activity of essential oils,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 61, no. 46, pp. 10835–10847, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. J. R. Calo, P. G. Crandall, C. A. O’Bryan, and S. C. Ricke, “Essential oils as antimicrobials in food systems-a review,” Food Control, vol. 54, pp. 111–119, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. M. K. Swamy, M. S. Akhtar, and U. Rani Sinniah, “Antimicrobial properties of plant essential oils against human pathogens and their mode of action: an updated review,” Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, vol. 2016, Article ID 3012462, 21 pages, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. R. Pérez-Rosés, E. Risco, R. Vila, P. Peñalver, and S. Cañigueral, “Biological and nonbiological antioxidant activity of some essential oils,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 64, no. 23, pp. 4716–4724, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. A. V. Coria-Téllez, E. Montalvo-Gónzalez, E. M. Yahia, and E. N. Obledo-Vázquez, “Annona muricata: a comprehensive review on its traditional medicinal uses, phytochemicals, pharmacological activities, mechanisms of action and toxicity,” Arabian Journal of Chemistry, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 662–691, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. S. Moghadamtousi, M. Fadaeinasab, S. Nikzad, G. Mohan, H. Ali, and H. Kadir, “Annona muricata (Annonaceae): a review of its traditional uses, isolated acetogenins and biological activities,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 16, no. 7, pp. 15625–15658, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. P. Champy, A. Melot, V. Guérineau Eng et al., “Quantification of acetogenins in Annona muricata linked to atypical parkinsonism in guadeloupe,” Movement Disorders, vol. 20, no. 12, pp. 1629–1633, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. K. W. Cheong, C. P. Tan, H. Mirhosseini, N. S. A. Hamid, A. Osman, and M. Basri, “Equilibrium headspace analysis of volatile flavor compounds extracted from soursop (Annona muricata) using solid-phase microextraction,” Food Research International, vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 1267–1276, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. S. S. Elhawary, M. E. E. Tantawy, M. A. Rabeh, and E. F. Noha, “DNA fingerprinting, chemical composition, antitumor and antimicrobial activities of the essential oils and extractives of four Annona species from Egypt,” Journal of Natural Sciences Research, vol. 3, no. 59–68, p. 11, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  27. F. Fekam Boyom, P. H. Amvam Zollo, C. Menut, G. Lamaty, and J. M. Bessière, “Aromatic plants of tropical central Africa. Part XXVII. Comparative study of the volatile constituents of five annonaceae species growing in Cameroon,” Flavour and Fragrance Journal, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 333–338, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. L. Jirovetz, G. Buchbauer, and M. B. Ngassoum, “Essential oil compounds of the Annona muricata fresh fruit pulp from Cameroon,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 46, no. 9, pp. 3719-3720, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. C. Kossouoh, M. Moudachirou, V. Adjakidje, J.-C. Chalchat, and G. Figuérédo, “Essential oil chemical composition of Annona muricata L. Leaves from Benin,” Journal of Essential Oil Research, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 307–309, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. A. J. MacLeod and N. M. Pieris, “Volatile flavor components of soursop (Annona muricata),” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 488–490, 1981. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. C. Márquez, J. Carlos, A. M. Jimenez, C. Osorio, R. José, and V. Cartagena, “Volatile compounds during the ripening of Colombian soursop (Annona muricata L. Cv. Elita),” Vitae, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 245–250, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  32. M. S. Owolabi, A. Lanre Ogundajo, N. S. Dosoky, and W. N. Setzer, “The cytotoxic activity of Annona muricata leaf oil from badagary, Nigeria,” American Journal of Essential Oils and Natural Products, vol. 1, pp. 1–3, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  33. Y. Pélissier, C. Marion, D. Kone, G. Lamaty, C. Menut, and J.-M. Bessière, “Volatile components of Annona muricata L,” Journal of Essential Oil Research, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 411–414, 1994. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. J. A. Pino, J. Agüero, and R. Marbot, “Volatile components of soursop (Annona muricata L.),” Journal of Essential Oil Research, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 140-141, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. T. D. Thang, D. N. Dai, T. M. Hoi, and I. A. Ogunwande, “Study on the volatile oil contents of Annona glabra L., Annona squamosa L., Annona muricata L. and Annona reticulata L., from Vietnam,” Natural Product Research, vol. 27, no. 13, pp. 1232–1236, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. K. C. Wong and K. H. Khoo, “Volatile components of Malaysian annona fruits,” Flavour and Fragrance Journal, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 5–10, 1993. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. A. Wélé, I. Ndoye, and M. Badiane, “Fatty acid and essential oil compositions of the seed oil of five Annona species,” Nigerian Journal of Natural Products and Medicine, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 62–65, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. R. P. Adams, Identification of Essential Oil Components by Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry, vol. 456, Allured Publishing Corporation, Carol Stream, IL, USA, 2007.
  39. J. K. Patra, Se-W. Lee, Y.-S. Kwon, J. Gyu Park, and K.-H. Baek, “Chemical characterization and antioxidant potential of volatile oil from an edible seaweed porphyra tenera (Kjellman, 1897),” Chemistry Central Journal, vol. 11, no. 1, p. 34, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. P. Prieto, M. Pineda, and M. Aguilar, “Spectrophotometric quantitation of antioxidant capacity through the formation of a phosphomolybdenum complex: specific application to the determination of vitamin E,” Analytical Biochemistry, vol. 269, no. 2, pp. 337–341, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. D. Mukhopadhyay, P. Dasgupta, D. S. Roy et al., “A sensitive in vitro spectrophotometric hydrogen peroxide scavenging assay using 1,10-phenanthroline,” Free Radicals & Antioxidants, vol. 6, no. 1, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. L. S. Borquaye, G. Darko, E. Ocansey, and E. Ankomah, “Antimicrobial and antioxidant properties of the crude peptide extracts of Galatea paradoxa and Patella rustica,” SpringerPlus, vol. 4, no. 1, p. 500, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. L. S. Borquaye, G. Darko, N. Oklu, C. Anson-Yevu, and A. Ababio, “Antimicrobial and antioxidant activities of ethyl acetate and methanol extracts of Littorina littorea and Galatea paradoxa,” Cogent Chemistry, vol. 2, no. 1, Article ID 1161865, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. L. Peng, Y. Kawagoe, P. Hogan, and D. Delmer, “Sitosterol-beta- glucoside as primer for cellulose synthesis in plants,” Science, vol. 295, no. 5552, pp. 147–150, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. A. I. Hussain, F. Anwar, S. T. Hussain Sherazi, and R. Przybylski, “Chemical composition, antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of basil (Ocimum basilicum) essential oils depends on seasonal variations,” Food Chemistry, vol. 108, no. 3, pp. 986–995, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. P. C. Santos-Gomes and M. Fernandes-Ferreira, “Organ- and season-dependent variation in the essential oil composition of Salvia officinalis L. Cultivated at two different sites,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 49, no. 6, pp. 2908–2916, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. W. Aidi Wannes, B. Mhamdi, B. Marzouk, and B. Marzouk, “Variations in essential oil and fatty acid composition during Myrtus communis var. italica fruit maturation,” Food Chemistry, vol. 112, no. 3, pp. 621–626, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. M. Hudaib, E. Speroni, A. M. Di Pietra, and V. Cavrini, “GC/MS evaluation of thyme (Thymus vulgaris L.) oil composition and variations during the vegetative cycle,” Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 691–700, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. A. M. Viljoen, S. Subramoney, S. F. v. Vuuren, K. H. C. Başer, and B. Demirci, “The composition, geographical variation and antimicrobial activity of Lippia javanica (verbenaceae) leaf essential oils,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 96, no. 1-2, pp. 271–277, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. C. Demirci and A. Studer, Encyclopedia of Radicals in Chemistry, Biology, and Materials, vol. 2, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK, 2012.
  51. M. C. Foti, “Antioxidant properties of phenols,” Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, vol. 59, no. 12, pp. 1673–1685, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. G. W. Burton, T. Doba, E. Gabe et al., “Autoxidation of biological molecules. 4. Maximizing the antioxidant activity of phenols,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 107, no. 24, pp. 7053–7065, 1985. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2019 Joseph Nana Gyesi et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.
 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2021, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.