Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Canadian Journal of Infectious Diseases and Medical Microbiology
Volume 2018, Article ID 8402839, 6 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/8402839
Research Article

Identification of Functional Domain(s) of Fibrillarin Interacted with p2 of Rice stripe virus

1Key Laboratory of Biopesticide and Chemical Biology, Ministry of Education, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China
2College of Plant Protection, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China

Correspondence should be addressed to Luping Zheng; moc.621@zgnipul

Received 4 October 2017; Accepted 6 December 2017; Published 15 March 2018

Academic Editor: Jialiang Yang

Copyright © 2018 Luping Zheng et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

p2 of Rice stripe virus may promote virus systemic infection by interacting with the full length of fibrillarin from Nicotiana benthamiana (NbFib2) in the nucleolus and cajal body (CB). NbFib2 contains three functional domains. We used yeast two-hybrid, colocalization, and bimolecular fluorescence complementation (BiFC) assays to study the interactions between p2 and the three domains of NbFib2, namely, the N-terminal fragment containing a glycine and arginine-rich (GAR) domain, the central RNA-binding domain, and the C-terminal fragment containing an α-helical domain. The results show that the N-terminal domain is indispensable for NbFib2 to localize in the nucleolus and cajal body. p2 binds all three regions of NbFib2, and they target to the nucleus but fail to the nucleolus and cajal bodies (CBs).

1. Introduction

Rice stripe virus (RSV), an economically significant pathogen of rice, is the member of the genus Tenuivirus. It is transmitted by the small brown planthopper (Laodelphax striatellus) in a persistent, circulative-propagative manner, affected by global warming [1, 2]. Nicotiana benthamiana (N. benthamiana) can be infected by RSV through mechanical sap inoculation [3].

The genome of RSV comprises four single-stranded RNAs, denoted as RNA1, RNA2, RNA3, and RNA4 in the decreasing order of their molecular weights [4]. Exception is RNA1 that is negative sense and encodes only one protein responsible for viral replication; all the other three RNA segments employ an unusual ambisense coding strategy and encode two proteins: one in the viral-sense RNA (vRNA) and the other in the viral complementary-sense RNA (vcRNA) [5, 6]. RNA2 encodes two nonstructural proteins p2 and pc2; p2 is a viral RNA-silencing suppressor and is involved in systemic viral movement by interacting with fibrillarin [7, 8], and pc2 shares many characteristics common to the glycoproteins [9, 10]. RNA3 encodes a nonstructural protein p3, another suppressor of gene silencing [11], and a structural protein pc3, which is a nucleocapsid protein connected with resistance to RSV [12, 13]. The nonstructural disease-specific protein (SP) and the movement protein pc4 are encoded by RNA4 [14, 15].

Many different viruses bind to the nucleolus to manipulate host-cell functions and recruit nucleoprotein to aid in virus infection. Fibrillarin, an important nucleolus protein, was reported to interact with viral proteins and regulate virus replication, movement, and so on. Fibrillarin from Nicotiana benthamiana (NbFib2) mediates assembly of Umbravirus ribonucleoprotein particles (RNPs), which are capable of long-distance movement and causing systemic viral infection [16]. Protein 1 (NS1) in Influenza A H3N2 subtype virus binds to the fibrillarin via the C-terminal nuclear localization signal 2 (NLS2) [17]. There is also a close relationship between fibrillarin and suppressors of gene silencing. For example, fibrillarin interacted with viral genome-linked protein (VPg) in Potato virus A (PVA) and the 2b silencing suppressor protein in Cucumber mosaic virus (CMV), respectively [18, 19]. In our previous works, we found that p2 of RSV targeted to NbFib2 to promote virus systemic movement [8]. NbFib2 is an evolutionarily conserved protein, it is usually consisted of three domains, a glycine and arginine-rich domain (GAR), an RNA-binding domain, and an α-helical domain [20], but how p2 interacted with those motifs of NbFib2 is still unknown.

In this study, the interactions between p2 and the three domains of NbFib2 are identified using yeast two-hybrid, colocalization, and BiFC methods. The results reveal that p2 binds to the three domains of NbFib2 in the nucleus but fails to target to the nucleolus and cajal bodies (CBs), and the GAR domain is necessary for NbFib2 to localize in the nucleolus and CBs.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. p2 Interacts with Three Domains of NbFib2 in Yeast Two-Hybrid Assay

NbFib2 is composed of three functional domains: N-terminal fragment, containing a glycine and arginine-rich (GAR) domain (NbFib2-1), the central RNA-binding domain (NbFib2-2), and C-terminal fragment, containing an α-helical domain (NbFib2-3) (Figure 1). As shown in Figure 2, yeast cells cotransformed with pGADT7 (pGAD)-p2 and pGBKT7 (pGBK)-NbFib2 grew and turned blue on SD medium containing X-α-gal but lacking adenine (Ade), histidine (His), leucine (Leu), and tryptophan (Trp) (SD/Trp−Leu−His−Ade−/X-α-gal+), and the cotransformants of pGAD-T/pGBK-53 and pGAD-T/pGBK-Lam were individually used as positive control and negative control. However, the cotransformants of pGBK/pGAD, pGBK-NbFib2s/pGAD, pGBK/pGAD-NbFib2s, pGBK-p2/pGAD, or pGBK/pGAD-p2 failed to grow on SD/Leu−Trp−His−, although they grew well on SD/Trp−Leu− (Supplementary Figure S1). These results indicated that p2 of RSV interacts with the three domains of NbFib2 in yeast.

Figure 1: Three functional domains of NbFib2. NbFib2-1: N-terminal fragment from 1 aa to 130 aa, containing a GAR region and a glycine- and arginine-rich domain. RBS means RNA binding sites. NbFib2-2: the central RNA-binding domain from 131 aa to 221 aa. NbFib2-3: the C-terminal fragment from 222 aa to 314 aa, containing an α-helical domain.
Figure 2: Interactions between p2 and the three functional domains of NbFib2 as examined by yeast two-hybrid assay. An X-α-gal assay shows that p2 interacts with the three domains of NbFib2, respectively. pGAD-T + pGB-Lam is a negative control, and pGAD-T + pGBK-53 is a positive control.
2.2. p2 Fails to Target to the Nucleus and Cajal Body in Colocation Assays

Colocalization result shows that only NbFib2-1 (GAR domain) can form bright spots in the nucleolus and cajal body (CB) (Figure 3(a)). The other two domains of NbFib2 (NbFib2-2 and NbFib2-3) also localize in nucleus, but they cannot agglomerate into small spots (Figures 3(b) and 3(c)). p2 can colocalize with NbFib2-1, NbFib2-2, and NbFib2-3 in the nucleus but fail to form into granules in the nucleus and CB or in the cytoplasm (Figure 3).

Figure 3: p2 colocalizes with the three functional domains of NbFib2 in the leaves of N. benthamiana. (a) p2-CFP was coexpressed with NbFib2-1-YFP. (b) p2-CFP was coexpressed with NbFib2-2-YFP. (c) p2-CFP was coexpressed with NbFib2-3-YFP. The nucleus was stained with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI). Possible nucleolus and cajal body described in the text are designated with red and blue arrows, respectively. Fluorescence was observed at 48 h postinfiltration. Scale bars, 10 μm.
2.3. p2 Binds Three Domains of NbFib2 in BiFC Assay

In BiFC assay, p2 binds NbFib2-1, NbFib2-2, and NbFib2-3 individually, and they almost localize in the nucleus but not in the nucleus and CB in the shape of spots (Figure 4).

Figure 4: p2 interacts with the three functional domains of NbFib2 in BiFC assay. (a) YC-p2 was coexpressed with YN-NbFib2-1. (b) YC-p2 was coexpressed with YN-NbFib2-2. and (c) YC-p2 was coexpressed with YN-NbFib2-3. The nucleus was stained with 4,6-diaminophenylindole (DAPI). Fluorescence was observed at 48 h postinfiltration. Scale bars, 10 μm.

In summary, we found that (i) GAR domain was essential for NbFib2 to target to the nucleolus and CB, (ii) p2 interacted with the three functional regions of NbFib2, and (iii) these interactions occurred in the nucleus but failed to form bright spots targeting to the nucleolus and CBs.

NbFib2 is divided into three functional domains in our study; those domains localize in the nucleus, but only the N-terminal (GAR) domain targets to the nucleolus and CB as same as the full length of NbFib2. The GAR domain might be important for fibrillarin accumulation in the nucleolus [21]. It was reported that the GAR region was necessary and sufficient to target fibrillarin 1 from Arabidopsis and human cell to the nucleolus and CBs [22, 23]. Some findings demonstrate that the C-terminal region of fibrillarin targets it to CBs [23, 24]. However, our colocalization result shows that YFP of C-terminal region fails to accumulate and forms multiple spots in CBs. Thus, GAR domain is significant and indispensable for NbFib2 to target to the nucleolus or CB.

In this study, p2 binds to the three functional regions of NbFib2 in the nucleus but not in the nucleolus, CBs, or cytoplasm. These results are consistent with our previous studies, which show that p2 interacts with the full length of NbFib2, and NbFib2 plays a role in both the nucleolar localization and the appropriate cytoplasmic distribution of p2 [8]. The N-terminal fragment of fibrillarin, containing the glycine- and arginine-rich (GAR) domain, is supposed to be responsible for the interaction with various cellular and viral proteins, such as survival motor neuron (SMN), nucleocapsid protein of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV), and ORF3 of groundnut rosette virus (GRV) [2527]. Our assays demonstrate that the GAR domain of NbFib2 is the region interactive with p2. p2 is an RNA-silencing suppressor (RRS); it may like other RRSs (p19 and HC-Pro) inhibit the intermediate step of RNA silencing via binding siRNA or the effector protein. Some indicate that fibrillarin is involved in the process of gene silencing induced by viruses, and fibrillarin interacts with long viral RNAs, rRNA, or siRNA [18, 28]. Fibrillarin 2 from Arabidopsis (AtFib2) has two RNA-binding regions, one located in the central region and the other located in the C-terminal region, while the GAR domain is incapable of RNA binding [28]. Fibrillarin is a highly conserved protein, and NbFib2 is highly homologous to AtFib2; thus, these two same domains of NbFib2 are capable of RNA binding. NbFib2-2 and NbFib2-3 may aid p2 to target to the siRNA or in other ways play a role in RNA silencing in plants.

In short, the results of this study are consistent with the previous study that the full length of NbFib2 is essential for p2 to target to the nucleolus and CBs. In addition, p2 interacts with the three functional regions of NbFib2, respectively; the mechanisms of these interactions will be studied in the future.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Plant Growth Conditions

The N. benthamiana plants were grown and maintained in a greenhouse at 25°C.

3.2. Plasmid Construction

cDNAs encoding the three domains of NbFib2 and RSV-p2 were amplified, respectively, by PCR using primers in Table 1, designed from N. benthamiana and RSV sequences (GenBank accession nos.: AM269909 and EF493228) downloaded from the GenBank. The three domains of NbFib2 were first inserted into the entry vector pDonr221 and then the destination vectors pEarleyGate101 (YFP), pEarleyGate201-YN (YN), and pEarleyGate201-YC (YC), using the Gateway recombination system [29]. pEarleyGate102-p2 (CFP-p2), YN-p2, and YC-p2 constructs were obtained by the same methods.

Table 1: The sequences, homologous recombination, and restriction sites of PCR primers.

For yeast two-hybrid experiments, PCR products of RSV-p2 and the three domains of NbFib2 were digested with suitable restriction enzymes individually and then ligated to the vector pGADT7 or pGBKT7 digested with the same enzymes.

These constructs were confirmed by capillary sequencing conducted by Takara (Dalian, China).

3.3. Yeast Two-Hybrid Assay

pGBKT7-NbFib2s (three domains of NbFib2) were introduced together with pGADT7-p2 into the yeast strain AH109 by cotransformation. The cotransformants grew on different SD mediums: medium lacking tryptophan (Trp) and leucine (Leu) (SD/Trp−Leu−); medium lacking histidine (His), Trp, and Leu (SD/Trp−Leu−His−); and medium lacking adenine (Ade−), His, Trp, and Leu but containing X-α-gal (SD/Trp−Leu−His−Ade−/X-α-gal+). The cotransformation of pGADT7-NbFib2s and pGBKT7-p2 was also done the same way.

3.4. Agrobacterium-Mediated Transient Expression

Agrobacterium tumefaciens (A. tumefaciens) strain EHA105 were grown separately to OD600 = 0.8 at 28°C on the Luria–Bertani liquid medium supplemented with 50 μg/μL of rifampicin and 50 μg/μL of kanamycin. The resulting cultures were centrifuged at 12,000 for 1 min and then resuspended in induction media (10 mM MES, pH 5.6, 10 mM MgCl2, and 150 μM acetosyringone). In colocalization and BiFC assays, A. tumefaciens containing NbFib2s were separately mixed with p2 in equal volumes. The mixtures of the bacterial cultures were incubated at room temperature for 3 h and then infiltrated onto fully-grown upper leaves. Six-week-old N. benthamiana was used for the experiment.

3.5. Confocal Imaging Analysis

Subcellular localizations of proteins were monitored at 48 h after infiltration under a confocal microscope (Leica TCS SP5, Leica Microsystems CMS GmbH). The fluorophores in CFP and YFP were excited at 458 and 514 nm, and images were taken using BA480–495 and BA535–565 nm emission filters, respectively.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Science Foundation of China (Grant no. 31401715) and the Fujian Province Scholarship for overseas studies (Grant no. [2016]29).

Supplementary Materials

Figure S1: the cotransformants of yeast cells on SD/Trp−Leu−. (Supplementary Materials)

References

  1. B. W. Falk and J. H. Tsai, “Biology and molecular biology of viruses in the genus Tenuivirus,” Annual Review of Phytopathology, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 139–163, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. K. Yamamura and M. Yokozawa, “Prediction of a geographical shift in the prevalence of Rice stripe virus disease transmitted by the small brown planthopper, Laodelphax striatellus (Fallén) (Hemipitera: Delphacidae), under global warming,” Applied Entomology and Zoology, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 181–190, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  3. C. Zhang, X. Pei, Z. Wang et al., “The Rice stripe virus pc4 functions in movement and foliar necrosis expression in Nicotiana benthamiana,” Virology, vol. 425, no. 2, pp. 113–121, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. S. Toriyama and Y. Watanabe, “Characterization of single-and double-stranded RNAs in particles of Rice stripe virus,” Journal of General Virology, vol. 70, no. 3, pp. 505–511, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. M. Yao, T. Zhang, T. Zhou et al., “Repetitive prime-and-realign mechanism converts short capped RNA leaders into longer ones that may be more suitable for elongation during rice stripe virus transcription initiation,” Journal of General Virology, vol. 93, no. 1, pp. 194–202, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. S. Toriyama, M. Takahashi, Y. Sano, T. Shimizu, and A. Ishihama, “Nucleotide sequence of RNA 1, the largest genomic segment of Rice stripe virus, the prototype of the Tenuiviruses,” Journal of General Virology, vol. 75, no. 12, pp. 3569–3580, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  7. Z. Du, D. Xiao, J. Wu et al., “p2 of Rice stripe virus (RSV) interacts with OsSGS3 and is a silencing suppressor,” Molecular Plant Pathology, vol. 12, no. 8, pp. 808–814, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. L. Zheng, Z. Du, C. Lin et al., “Tenuivirus may recruit or manipulate nucleolar functions through an interaction with fibrillarin to promote virus systemic movement,” Molecular Plant Pathology, vol. 16, no. 9, pp. 921–930, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. S. L. Zhao, X. J. Dai, J. S. Liang, and C. Y. Liang, “Surface display of Rice stripe virus NSvc2 and analysis of its membrane fusion activity,” Virologica Sinica, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 100–108, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. M. Yao, X. Liu, S. Li et al., “Rice stripe tenuivirus NSvc2 glycoproteins targeted to golgi body by N-terminal transmembrane domain and adjacent cytosolic 24 amino-acids via COP I-and COP II-dependent secretion pathway,” Journal of Virology, vol. 88, no. 6, pp. 3223–3234, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. R. Xiong, J. Wu, Y. Zhou, and X. Zhou, “Characterization and subcellular localization of an RNA silencing suppressor encoded by Rice stripe tenuivirus,” Virology, vol. 387, no. 1, pp. 29–40, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. Y. Zhu, T. Hayakawa, S. Toriyama, and M. Takahashi, “Complete nucleotide sequence of RNA 3 of Rice stripe virus: an ambisense coding strategy,” Journal of General Virology, vol. 72, no. 4, pp. 763–767, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. T. Hayakawa, Y. Zhu, K. Itoh et al., “Genetically engineered rice resistant to Rice stripe virus, an insect-transmitted virus,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 89, no. 20, pp. 9865–9869, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. Y. Zhu, T. Hayakawa, and S. Toriyama, “Complete nucleotide sequence of RNA 4 of Rice stripe virus isolate T, and comparison with another isolate and with Maize stripe virus,” Journal of General Virology, vol. 73, no. 5, pp. 1309–1321, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. R. Xiong, J. Wu, Y. Zhou, and X. Zhou, “Identification of a movement protein of the Tenuivirus Rice stripe virus,” Journal of Virology, vol. 82, no. 24, pp. 12304–12311, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. S. H. Kim, S. MacFarlane, N. O. Kalinina et al., “Interaction of a plant virus-encoded protein with the major nucleolar protein fibrillarin is required for systemic virus infection,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 104, no. 26, pp. 11115–11120, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. K. Melén, J. Tynell, R. Fagerlund, P. Roussel, D. Hernandez-Verdun, and I. Julkunen, “Influenza A H3N2 subtype virus NS1 protein targets into the nucleus and binds primarily via its C-terminal NLS2/NoLS to nucleolin and fibrillarin,” Virology Journal, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. M. L. Rajamäki and J. P. Valkonen, “Control of nuclear and nucleolar localization of nuclear inclusion protein a of picorna-like Potato virus A in Nicotiana species,” Plant Cell Online, vol. 21, no. 8, pp. 2485–2502, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. I. González, L. Martínez, D. V. Rakitina et al., “Cucumber mosaic virus 2b protein subcellular targets and interactions: their significance to RNA silencing suppressor activity,” Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 294–303, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. L. Zheng, J. Yao, F. Gao et al., “The subcellular localization and functional analysis of fibrillarin2, a nucleolar protein in Nicotiana benthamiana,” BioMed Research International, vol. 2016, Article ID 2831287, 9 pages, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. M. Y. Shubian, Y. R. Musinova, and E. V. Sheval, “Nucleolar methyltransferase fibrillarin: evolution of structure and functions,” Biochemistry, vol. 81, no. 9, pp. 941–950, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. K. T. Pih, M. J. Yi, Y. S. Liang et al., “Molecular cloning and targeting of a fibrillarin homolog from Arabidopsis,” Plant Physiology, vol. 123, no. 1, pp. 51–58, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. S. A. Levitskii, K. S. Mukhariamova, V. P. Veiko, and O. V. Zatsepina, “Identification of signal sequences determining the specific nucleolar localization of fibrillarin in HeLa cells,” Molecular Biology, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 405–413, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. S. Snaar, K. Wiesmeijer, A. G. Jochemsen, H. J. Tanke, and R. W. Dirks, “Mutational analysis of fibrillarin and its mobility in living human cells,” Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 151, no. 3, pp. 653–662, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. R. L. Nicol, N. Frey, and E. N. Olson, “From the sarcomere to the nucleus: role of genetics and signaling in structural heart disease,” Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 179–223, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  26. K. W. Jones, K. Gorzynski, C. M. Hales et al., “Direct interaction of the spinal muscular atrophy disease protein SMN with the small nucleolar RNA-associated protein fibrillarin,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 276, no. 42, pp. 38645–38651, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. D. Yoo, S. K. Wootton, G. Li, C. Song, and R. R. Rowland, “Colocalization and interaction of the Porcine arterivirus nucleocapsid protein with the small nucleolar RNA-associated protein fibrillarin,” Journal of Virology, vol. 77, no. 22, pp. 12173–12183, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. D. V. Rakitina, M. Taliansky, J. W. S. Brown, and N. O. Kalinina, “Two RNA-binding sites in plant fibrillarin provide interactions with various RNA substrates,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 39, no. 20, pp. 8869–8880, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. M. Karimi, D. Inzé, and A. Depicker, “GATEWAY™ vectors for Agrobacterium-mediated plant transformation,” Trends in Plant Science, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 193–195, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus