Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Case Reports in Hematology
Volume 2018, Article ID 3890361, 16 pages
Case Report

KIT D816V Positive Acute Mast Cell Leukemia Associated with Normal Karyotype Acute Myeloid Leukemia

1Serviço de Hematologia Clínica, Hospital de Santo António (HSA), Centro Hospitalar do Porto (CHP), Porto, Portugal
2Laboratório de Citometria, Serviço de Hematologia Clínica, Hospital de Santo António (HSA), Centro Hospitalar do Porto (CHP), Porto, Portugal
3Unidade Multidisciplinar de Investigação Biomédicas, Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas Abel Salazar da Universidade do Porto (UMIB/ICBAS/UP), Porto, Portugal
4Serviço de Anatomia Patológica, Hospital de Santo António (HSA), Centro Hospitalar do Porto (CHP), Porto, Portugal
5Laboratório de Genética Molecular, Serviço de Hematologia Clínica, Centro Hospitalar do Porto (CHP), Porto, Portugal
6Unidade de Biologia Molecular, Hospital de Santo António (HSA), Centro Hospitalar do Porto (CHP), Porto, Portugal
7Sequencing Service (NUCLEUS), University of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain
8Institute of Biomedical Research of Salamanca (IBSAL), Salamanca, Spain
9Biomedical Research Networking Centre Consortium (CIBER-CIBERONC), Madrid, Spain
10Serviço de Hematologia Laboratorial, Hospital de Santo António (HSA), Centro Hospitalar do Porto (CHP), Porto, Portugal
11Cytometry Service (NUCLEUS), University of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain
12Cancer Research Centre (IBMCC, USAL-CSIC), University of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain
13Department of Medicine, University of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain

Correspondence should be addressed to Margarida Lima; tp.xilc@amil.cmm

Received 22 October 2017; Accepted 6 December 2017; Published 18 February 2018

Academic Editor: Stephen Langabeer

Copyright © 2018 Marta Lopes et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


Introduction. Mast cell (MC) leukemia (MCL) is extremely rare. We present a case of MCL diagnosed concomitantly with acute myeloblastic leukemia (AML). Case Report. A 41-year-old woman presented with asthenia, anorexia, fever, epigastralgia, and diarrhea. She had a maculopapular skin rash, hepatosplenomegaly, retroperitoneal adenopathies, pancytopenia, 6% blast cells (BC) and 20% MC in the peripheral blood, elevated lactate dehydrogenase, cholestasis, hypoalbuminemia, hypogammaglobulinemia, and increased serum tryptase (184 μg/L). The bone marrow (BM) smears showed 24% myeloblasts, 17% promyelocytes, and 16% abnormal toluidine blue positive MC, and flow cytometry revealed 12% myeloid BC, 34% aberrant promyelocytes, a maturation blockage at the myeloblast/promyelocyte level, and 16% abnormal CD2−CD25+ MC. The BM karyotype was normal, and the KIT D816V mutation was positive in BM cells. The diagnosis of MCL associated with AML was assumed. The patient received corticosteroids, disodium cromoglycate, cladribine, idarubicin and cytosine arabinoside, high-dose cytosine arabinoside, and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). The outcome was favorable, with complete hematological remission two years after diagnosis and one year after HSCT. Conclusions. This case emphasizes the need of an exhaustive laboratory evaluation for the concomitant diagnosis of MCL and AML, and the therapeutic options.

1. Introduction

Mastocytoses are rare neoplasms defined by an abnormal expansion/accumulation of clonal mast cells (MC) in one or more organs or tissues [1, 2]. The 2016 revision to the “World Health Organization (WHO) Classification of Tumors of the Hematopoietic and Lymphoid Tissues” divides the disease into cutaneous mastocytosis (CM), systemic mastocytosis (SM), and localized mast cell tumors [1, 2]. Cutaneous mastocytosis includes maculopapular CM, also known as urticaria pigmentosa, diffuse CM, and mastocytoma of skin. Systemic mastocytosis is further divided into indolent SM (ISM), smoldering SM (SSM), and advanced SM variants; the latter includes aggressive SM (ASM), mast cell leukemia (MCL), and SM with associated hematological neoplasm (SM-AHN), previously known as SM with associated clonal hematological non-MC lineage disease (SM-AHNMD), and mast cell leukemia (MCL) [1, 2]. Associated hematological neoplasms may consist of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN), myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms (MDS/MPN), and also acute myeloid leukemia (AML).

In the last years, serum tryptase levels [3], immunophenotypic characterization of BM mast cells by flow cytometry (FCM) [4, 5] and KIT mutation analysis [6], have proved to be useful for establishing the diagnosis, subclassifying and evaluating the prognosis of SM, adding important information to conventional cytomorphology and histopathology. Mast cells, and often other BM cells, from most patients with SM usually harbor the activating KIT D816V mutation. In addition, they regularly have abnormal morphology, from atypical MC type I, usually observed in ISM, to more immature atypical MC type II and metachromatic blasts, more frequently found in ASM and MCL, and they exhibit abnormal phenotypic features, from which the most frequent and more extensively studied are positivity for CD25 and/or CD2.

Mast cell leukemia accounts for <1% of all mastocytosis, it may appear de novo or secondary to a previously diagnosed MC disorder (usually ASM or SM-AHN), and it may associate with other hematological neoplasms (MCL-AHN) [7, 8]. Diagnosis is based on the presence of ≥20% atypical MC in the bone marrow (BM) and/or ≥10% in the peripheral blood (PB); an aleukemic variant with less than 10% of MC in the PB also exists. The European/American Consensus Group on Mastocytosis (EU/US-CGM) proposed a subclassification that distinguishes acute from chronic MCL based on the presence or absence of organ damage, respectively [9]. The neoplastic MC usually have an immature morphology and an abnormal immature and/or activated phenotype, although they often fail to have the abnormal CD2+CD25+ pattern encountered in most forms of SM; in addition, the KIT D816V mutation is detected in less than 50% of cases, and most patients have a normal karyotype. Symptoms of MC activation and involvement of the liver, spleen, peritoneum, digestive tract, and bones are relatively frequent, and skin lesions occur in only 1/3 of the cases. Treatment usually fails, and the median survival time is short. Due in part to the rarity, no standard therapy exists, and the role of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) needs further investigation.

Distinguishing MCL from SM associated with AML and from myelomastocytic leukemia (MML) is a challenge and requires a detailed laboratory investigation using cytology, cytochemistry, histopathology, immunohistochemistry, immunophenotypic, and genetic approaches [916]. The EU/US-CGM and the European Competence Network on Mastocytosis (ECNM) have recently proposed the criteria to establish the differential diagnosis between these entities [9].

We present a case of MCL diagnosed concomitantly to AML, given emphasis on the role of the laboratory exams, specially immunophenotyping and genetic testing, in establishing the differential diagnosis with MML. In addition, we compare the clinical and laboratory features of our patient with those described in previously published series of patients with MCL, ISM, ASM, and SM-ANH. Finally, we describe the success of the therapeutic strategy used in this patient, which included cladribine, anthracycline in combination with cytosine arabinoside, and HSCT.

2. Case Report

A 41-year-old Caucasian woman was admitted at the hospital with one-month history of asthenia, anorexia, fever, abdominal pain, early postprandial surfeit, and diarrhea. She had past history of an intermittent migratory pruritic maculopapular rash and mild episodes of flushing that had never been investigated, hypothyroidism, an anxiety disorder, and emotional instability, and she had smoked 20 cigarettes a day since the age of 13. There was no history of allergies or other pathologies.

When first observed at the hospital, she had a fever, a dark spot on the tongue, a slightly pruritic brownish erythematous maculopapular skin rash predominantly in the upper limbs, hepatomegaly (the left lobe of liver was enlarged and extended to epigastric region and the right lobe was four fingers below the right costal margin in the midclavicular line), and splenomegaly (5 fingers below the left costal margin). There was no peripheral lymphadenopathy.

Peripheral blood counts revealed pancytopenia: hemoglobin (Hg) 11.0 g/dl (normal range 12.0–15.0), platelets 16 × 109/L (normal range 150–400), and white blood cells (WBC) 4.25 × 109/L (normal range 4.0–11.0) with 7.0% neutrophils (0.3 × 109/L) (normal range 2.0–7.5), 6% blast cells (BC), and 20% of cells with metachromatic cytoplasmic granules that were initially classified as basophils by morphology (Figure 1), but whose immunophenotypic study subsequently revealed them to be an abnormal immature MC.

Figure 1: Peripheral blood smears showing different types of morphologically abnormal mast cells. Leishman’s stain (a, 40x; b, 100x). Circulating mast cells (MC) had variable morphological features, from metachromatic blasts of medium to large cell size, round to oval shape, fine/immature nuclear chromatin, high nuclear : cytoplasmic ratio, and cytoplasmic metachromatic granules, to atypical MC type 2 with variable, sometimes spindle, cell shape, bilobated nucleus with fine to moderately condensed chromatin, variable nuclear : cytoplasmic ratio, and hypogranulated cytoplasm. Please note that in spite of these heterogeneous morphological features, all the MC present in the peripheral blood had an aberrant immature phenotype, corresponding to abnormal MC precursors (Figure 4).

Serum biochemistry showed elevated lactate dehydrogenase (369 U/L, normal range 135–214 U/L) and abnormal hepatic tests with a cholestatic pattern: total bilirubin 1.2 mg/dl (normal range: 0.2–1.0), direct bilirubin 1.1 mg/dl (normal range: 0.0–0.2), indirect bilirubin 1.14 mg/dl (normal range: 0.0–1.0), alanine transaminase 90 U/L (normal range: 10–30), aspartate transaminase 36 U/L (normal range: 10–30), alkaline phosphatase 731 U/L (normal range: 32–104), and gamma-glutamyl transferase 638 U/L (normal range: 6–39). There was also hypoalbuminemia (serum albumin 32 g/L, normal range: 35–50) and hypogammaglobulinemia (serum IgG 522 mg/dl, normal range: 793–1590; IgA 127 mg/dl, normal range: 114–457; IgM 170 mg/dl, normal range: 29–226). Serum tryptase levels were markedly increased (184 μg/L, normal range < 13 μg/L). Calcium and phosphate serum levels were normal, as did renal function tests. Coagulation tests, including prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time, and fibrinogen levels, were within the normal range. Serological tests for hepatitis B and C viruses and human immunodeficiency virus type 1 and 2 were negative.

Bone marrow smears showed 24% myeloperoxidase (MPO) positive BC, 17% promyelocytes, 4% myelocytes, 3% metamyelocytes + neutrophils (AML-M2 classification by cytomorphology), 30% erythroid lineage, and 16% morphologically abnormal toluidine blue positive MC (Figure 2). These cells had variable morphological features, from atypical MC type I and II to metachromatic blasts. There was no BM eosinophilia, or evidence of myelodysplasia. Flow cytometry of the BM aspirate revealed 12% of CD45+ (low), CD117+, CD34+ myeloid precursor cells (MPC) also expressing CD123, HLA-DR (high), CD13, CD33, CD65 (low), and CD25 (low, in part of the cells) but lacking CD10, CD15, CD16, CD2, CD30, and FcεRI/IgE; 5% of CD45+ (low), CD117+, CD34− MC precursors (MCP), also being positive for CD123 (high), CD13, CD33, CD65 (low), CD25, CD30, FcεRI/IgE, and HLA-DR (high), and lacking CD10, CD15, CD16, and CD2; 34% promyelocytes with an aberrant phenotype (CD45+, CD34−, CD117+, CD13+low, CD33+, CD65+; CD15+, MPO+, and CD2, CD10, CD11b, CD16, CD25, CD30, FcεRI/IgE, and HLA-DR negative); a maturation blockage at the promyelocyte level, as revealed by an abnormal CD11b/CD13/CD16 maturation pattern, with <1% of CD16+CD10+ mature neutrophils; and 13% of abnormal CD45+, CD34−, CD117+high MC with a relatively immature (CD123+high, FcεRI/IgE+ low, and HLA-DR+high), activated (CD63+, CD69+), and aberrant (CD2−, CD25+, and CD30+) immunophenotype (Figure 3). Cytoplasmic carboxypeptidase and surface CD203 were also positive (data not shown). In addition, FCM performed in PB, showed 3% CD45+low, CD117+, CD34+ MPC, and 21% of CD45+low, CD117+, CD34− MCP, which were phenotypically similar to the correspondent BM cell populations, at least for the cell surface markers tested, but not CD45+, CD34−, and CD117+ high MC (Figure 4).

Figure 2: Bone marrow smears showing myeloperoxidase positive blast cells and promyelocytes, and morphologically abnormal toluidine blue positive mast cells. (a) Leishman. (b) Myeloperoxidase. (c) Toluidine blue staining.
Figure 3: Bone marrow dot plots obtained by flow cytometry revealing 12% CD117+ CD34+ myeloid precursor cells (black dots), 5% CD117+CD34-mast cell precursors (orange dots), 13% of abnormal CD2− CD25+ mast cells (red dots), and 49% granulocytic cells with a maturation blockage at the promyelocyte level (purple dots). Myeloid precursor cells (black): CD117+, CD34+, CD2−, CD25−/+, CD13+, CD15−, CD16−, CD30−, CD33+, CD63+, CD65+low, CD69+low, CD123+, HLA-DR+high, and FcεRI/IgE−. Mast cell precursors (orange): CD117+, CD34−, CD2−, CD25+, CD13+, CD15−, CD16−, CD30+, CD33+, CD63+, CD65+low, CD69−, CD123+ high, HLA-DR−/+low, and FcεRI/IgE+. Mast cells (red): CD117+ high, CD34−, CD2−, CD25+ high, CD13+, CD15−, CD16−, CD30+, CD33+, CD63+, CD65+low, CD69+, CD123+ high, HLA-DR+high, and FcεRI/IgE+low.
Figure 4: Peripheral blood dot plots obtained by flow cytometry showing 3% of CD117+ CD34+ myeloid precursor cells (black dots) and 49% of CD117+ CD34-mast cells precursors (orange dots). Please note that circulating myeloid precursor cells (black dots) and mast cells precursor (orange dots) had an immunophenotype like that observed in bone marrow (BM) myeloid precursor cells and BM mast cell precursors, respectively (please cf. Figure 3, same color code). Please also note that the relatively mature mast cells observed in BM (red dots, Figure 3) were not present in the peripheral blood.

Bone marrow trephine biopsy revealed a hypercellular marrow with increased proportions of immature MPO+ myeloid cells and morphologically atypical CD117+ fusiform MC forming perivascular dense aggregates, and grade 2 fibrosis (Figure 5). Skin biopsy was not performed.

Figure 5: Bone marrow trephine biopsy showing a hypercellular marrow (a) with grade 2 fibrosis (b), and a preponderance of myeloid precursors with a diffuse proliferation of myeloperoxidase+ blast cells (c and d) and CD117+ mast cells (e and f). (a) Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stain, original amplification ×40. (b) Reticulin stain, original magnification ×100. (c) H&E stain, original amplification ×100. (d) MPO stain, original amplification ×100. (e) H&E stain, original amplification ×100. (f) CD117 stain, original amplification ×100.

Cytogenetic analyses of at least 20 Giemsa-banded BM cell metaphases obtained from unstimulated 24 hour cultures disclosed a 46,XX karyotype, without numerical or structural abnormalities. Genetic studies using probes for relevant targets, including t(15;17) PML-RARA, t(8;21) RUNX1-RUNX1T1, inv(16) CBFB-MYH11, and t(9,22) BCR-ABL, gave negative results. Tests for FLT3 (FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3) and NPM-1 (Nucleophosmin-1) gene mutations were also negative. KIT mutation at the codon 816 (D816V) (A7176T) was detected in all sorted BM cell populations, except in T cells; BM cells harboring the KIT D816V mutation included MC, CD34+ cells, CD34-HLA-DR-, CD34-HLA-DR+, and CD34-HLA-DR++ cells.

Abdominopelvic computerized tomography scan affirmed hepatomegaly (18.5 cm) and mild splenomegaly (13 cm) with small hypodense nodules (maximum diameter 10 mm) and revealed retroperitoneal adenopathies forming a conglomerate extending from the lesser gastric curvature and involving the large vessels; the largest adenopathy was in the hepatic-duodenal ligament and had 2.4 cm of major diameter. There was also a lamina of peritoneal liquid in pelvic cavitation.

Digestive endoscopy revealed slight reduced distensibility of the gastric body, which had a congestive mucosa with foci of erythema, and the duodenum had a congestive and micronodular mucosa. Biopsies were not performed due to severe thrombocytopenia. Skeleton radiography did not reveal osteolytic lesions. Thorax radiography had no evidence of mediastinal enlargement, lung consolidations, or pleural effusions.

According to the WHO criteria [1, 2], and to the consensus recommendations of the EU/US-CGM and the ECNM [9], the patient was diagnosed with KIT D816V+ MCL associated with AML with normal karyotype. She was immediately started with oral corticosteroids (prednisolone, 60 mg/day for one week, tapered to 20 mg/day over 1 month, and then maintaining 20 mg/day) and disodium cromoglycate (200 mg capsules, 4 times daily), and H1 (cetirizine, 10 mg/day, orally) and H2 (ranitidine, 150 mg twice a day, orally) antihistamines, which ameliorate the symptomatology. Then, she received two cycles of cladribine (0.14 mg/kg/day, administered over a 2-hour infusion for 5 days) with one month of interval, and the serum tryptase levels transiently decreased to 41 μg/L (Figure 6).

Figure 6: Serum tryptase levels from diagnosis of MCL-AML to date. Serum tryptase levels were markedly increased at the diagnosis (184 μg/L, October 2015) and decreased transiently to 41 μg/L after two cycles of cladribine (5 days, with one month of interval: December 2015; January 2016). However, one month later (February 2016), the serum tryptase levels increased again to 123 μg/L, and the BM aspirate showed 47% myeloblasts. At that time, the patient received two cycles of combined therapy with idarubicin and cytosine arabinoside (3 + 7 days) (February 2016; April 2016) followed by two cycles of high-dose cytosine arabinoside (June 2016; July 2016). At day  +32 of reinduction chemotherapy (May 2016), the patient achieved complete hematological remission, and the serum tryptase levels decreased to 8 mg/L, remaining normal to date. At the end of August 2016, the patient received allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) from her sister. By the time of this report (November 2017, 24 months after the diagnosis, 15 months after HSCT), she maintains a complete hematological remission and a complete chimerism in peripheral blood.

One month after, she maintained constitutional symptoms, hepatomegaly, and pancytopenia, and she developed cutaneous and mucosal hemorrhage (petechial rash, epistaxis, and spontaneous oral cavity bleeding), myalgia, and bone pain. By that time, the serum tryptase serum levels had increased to 123 μg/L (Figure 6), and the BM aspirate showed 47.0% myeloblasts, 8% promyelocytes, and 7.0% MC. Bone marrow FCM revealed 3% MPC (CD45+low, CD34+, CD117+, FcεRI/IgE−, CD2−, and CD25−/+), 7% MCP (CD45+ low, CD34−, CD117+, FcεRI/IgE+low, CD2−, and CD25+), 46% of immature granulocytic cells (almost complete maturational arrest at the promyelocyte stage), and 7% of CD45+, CD34−, CD117+ high, CD2−, and CD25+ MC. Peripheral blood counts were WBC 2.07 × 109/L, neutrophils 4.0% (0.08 × 109/L), MC 41.0%, BC 9.0%; Hg 8.8 g/dl; and platelets 28 × 109/L. Flow cytometry studies performed in the PB showed 48% CD45+ low, CD117+, CD34−, FcεRI/IgE+low, CD25+, CD2− MCP, 4% CD45+low, CD34+, CD117+, FcεRI/IgE−, CD25−/+, CD2− MPC; once again, circulating CD45+, CD34−, CD117+high, CD2−, CD25+ MC were not observed. By that time, she received induction therapy for AML consisting of two cycles of idarubicin (12 mg/m2/day, intravenous, for 3 days) and cytosine arabinoside (AraC) (100 mg/m2/day, intravenous, for 7 days), achieving hematological remission and normal tryptase levels after the second induction course (Figure 6). At that time, the BM smears were slightly hypocellular with 1.3% of BC and no MC. Bone marrow FCM studies detected 1.5% of CD117+ CD34+ MPC, 54% maturing granulocytic cells, from which 26% were promyelocytes, 53% were metamyelocytes and myelocytes, and 21% were mature neutrophils, and 0.03% were phenotypically abnormal MC (0.02% CD117+ CD34− CD2− CD25−/+low, FcεRI/IgE+ MCP, and 0.01% CD117+high CD34−, CD2−, CD25+, FcεRI/IgE+low MC). Consolidation therapy performed in the subsequent 2 months consisted of two courses of high-dose AraC (2 g/m2, intravenous).

As complication of treatment she had bartholinite, treated with piperacillin plus tazobactam, and metronidazole; oral mucositis grade II controlled with tramadol; febrile neutropenia with bacteremia by Escherichia Coli treated with piperacillin plus tazobactam; pneumonia without respiratory insufficiency, which was responsive to imipenem plus vancomycin, and pseudomembranous colitis by Clostridium difficile, treated with metronidazole.

Two months after the second course of consolidation chemotherapy, the patient received isogroup HLA-identical related allogeneic HSCT from her sister (10/10 match) (5.09 × 106/kg nonmanipulated peripheral blood CD34+ cells, totalizing 322 × 106 CD34+ cells). The reduced-intensity conditioning regimen included fludarabine (30 mg/m2/day for 5 days) and busulfan (4 mg/kg/day for 2 days). As acute complication, she had febrile neutropenia treated with meropenem. On day 30 after HSCT, she had recovery of the hematological counts, and no myeloblasts or MC were seen in the PB. Unfortunately, the BM aspirate was hypocellular and results from BM studies were unevaluable. Abdominal echography revealed stable hepatomegaly (17.5 cm), without splenomegaly, or adenomegalies. Three months after HSCT a complete chimerism was documented in PB and BM neutrophils, monocytes, and lymphocytes. She developed a chronic graft versus host disease with cutaneous manifestations, controlled with cyclosporine A and mycophenolate mofetil. By the time of this report (24 months after the diagnosis, 15 months after HSCT), she maintains normal serum tryptase levels, complete hematological remission, and complete chimerism in PB (Figure 6).

3. Discussion

According to the WHO classification, this complex case fulfils the criteria for the diagnosis of SM-AHN, more precisely, KIT D816V+ MCL associated with normal karyotype AML [1, 2]. Criteria for MCL include not only the conditions for SM, such as BM infiltration by morphologically and phenotypically abnormal MC forming dense aggregates (>15 MC), increased serum tryptase levels (>20 ng/ml), and the KIT (D816V) mutation in BM cells, but also 16% MC in the BM and 20% MC in the PB; criteria for AML were more than 20% MPO+ myeloblasts in the BM by cytomorphology. Curiously, FCM studies showed that the cells of the MC lineage were phenotypically heterogeneous, with both aberrant MCP and more mature MC being identified in the BM, and only the former being present in the PB. Interestingly, FCM studies also revealed that the granulocytic cells had an almost complete blockage at the promyelocyte stage, despite the fact that t(15;17) was negative. Thus, the MC and the granulocytic cell lineages were both compromised by the leukemic process. In accordance to this multilineage involvement, the KIT D816V mutation was found in all BM cell populations tested, except in T cells. These findings are in line with previous studies, indicating that the occurrence of KIT mutations in an early progenitor cell results multilineage involvement, MC maturation blockade, immature MC phenotype, and aggressive disease [1719]. The possibility of a secondary MCL arising in the context of a previously undiagnosed ISM is plausible, as the patient had a chronic maculopapular rash that had never been investigated. Unfortunately, skin biopsies were not performed, and thus, cutaneous infiltration by MC was not formally documented. It should however be mentioned, that secondary MCL usually occurs in patients with SM-AHN or ASM, and direct evolution from ISM to MCL is exceptionally rare [2022].

The clinical and laboratory findings in patients with systemic MC neoplasms are diverse, depending on the disease subset and on the individual variability, and they are related to the release of MC mediators and/or to the infiltration of organs and tissues by the abnormal MC, which ultimately result in organ damage/failure (C-symptoms) [8, 2022]. Except for a lower time from symptoms to diagnosis and a more severe neutropenia and thrombocytopenia, the clinical features observed in our patient with MCL + AML did not differ substantially from those usually found in patients with other advanced MC neoplasms, such as ASM and SM-AHN, as described in the largest series of patients with SM (342 cases), published by Lim et al. in 2009 (Table 1) [20]. In this series, ISM was the predominant SM subtype (46%), followed by SM-AHN (40%, subtype not specified) and ASM (12%), and only 4 cases were MCL (1%).

Table 1: Clinical and laboratory features observed in our patient with MCL + AML, as compared to those described in a series of 342 patients with SM, including ISM, ASM, and SM-AHN, published by Lim et al. in 2009 [20].

The clinical and laboratory features of our patient were those expected to occur in cases of MCL, as previously described in the literature (Table 2). In 2013, Georgin-Lavialle et al. revised all the MCL cases that had been published in scientific journals indexed in the MedLine [8]. In total, they provided data from 51 cases, including a series of 10 cases of MCL, published by Valentini et al. in 2008 [21], several cases reported individually from 1950 to 2012, and 4 personal unpublished cases; in 41 cases, they had enough data to classify them as de novo MCL (n = 30) or as secondary MCL (n = 11), and to compare the clinical and biological features of these entities (Table 2) [8]. Very recently, in 2017, Jawhar et al. reported on the clinical and laboratorial characteristics of 28 patients with MCL, from which 12 (43%) had secondary MCL and 20 (71%) had associated hematological neoplasms (MCL-AHN), other than AML [22] (Table 2). To the best of our knowledge, data available in the literature are not enough to establish if MCL-AHN has worse outcome than SM- (other than MCL) AHN, or if the type of AHN is more important for prognosis.

Table 2: Clinical and laboratory features observed in our patient with MCL + AML, as compared to those described in a review of 51 cases of MCL performed by Georgin-Lavialle et al. in 2013 [8], and in a series of 28 patients with MCL published by Jawhar et al. in 2017 [22].

Rare cases of MCL have been diagnosed previously, subsequently or concomitantly to AML, as occurring in this patient [2325]. Mast cell leukemia-AML cases exhibit a substantial increase (>20%) in myeloblasts in the BM, and they must be distinguished from MML where an AML may also be diagnosed, but criteria for SM are not met (Table 3).

Table 3: Clinical and laboratory features in our patient as compared to those observed in patients with MCL or MML, as schematized by Valent et al. in 2014 [9].

Myelomastocytic leukemia is a very rare type of leukemia that is not yet incorporated in the WHO classification of the tumors of lymphoid and hematopoietic tissues [9, 16]. It is characterized by an expansion (>10%) of atypical MC together with BC with metachromatic granules (identified as MC precursors by immunophenotyping) in the BM and/or PB, concomitantly with criteria for an advanced myeloid neoplasm, which may have features of AML, MDS with excess of blast cells, or accelerated/blast phase of a MPN or a MDS/MPN. By definition, MML carries no specific (recurrent) molecular and immunophenotypic markers for SM. Specifically, activating point mutations at codon 816 of KIT are not found, and the aberrant CD2+/CD25+ MC immunophenotype, which is typically found in the majority of SM cases, is rare in MML. In addition, in patients with MML, the karyotype usually reflects the underlying disease (e.g., MDS, MPN, MDS/MPN, and AML) and chromosomal aberrations are frequently complex; in contrast, no recurrent chromosome abnormalities are known for patients with MCL [9, 16]. In addition, the neoplastic MC in MCL usually express CD117, low tryptase, and low FcεRI, and are often CD25+, whereas in MML, MC also express CD117 and tryptase, but they habitually stain negative for CD25. CD2 is usually negative in both cases, being frequently detected in MC from patients with indolent or smoldering SM (Table 4). Some other markers, including HLA-DR, CD30, and CD123, may also be positive in MCL cells, as observed in our patient. Thus, the clinical and laboratory findings observed in this case would favor the diagnosis of MCL associated to AML, instead of MML.

Table 4: Cell molecules expressed in MC from our patient as compared to those usually expressed in the MC from patients with MCL or MML, as schematized by Valent et al. in 2014 [9].

Management of patients with AML relies on genetic tests that allows for the diagnosis, informs about prognosis, and predicts response to therapy, and the value of genetics is reinforced in the WHO classification scheme for AML. For instance, cytogenetic aberrations have long been recognized as important prognostic variables in AML patients [26]. However, patients with AML and normal karyotype have had a very heterogeneous outcome, and previous studies have indicated that many other molecular aberrations do influence the response to treatment as well as in the risk of relapse [27]. For example, AML with normal cytogenetics may carry poor prognostic genetic lesions, such as FLT3 mutations, overexpression of BAALC (brain and acute leukemia cytoplasmic), ERG (ETS/E26 transformation-specific-related gene), or MN1 (meningioma 1) genes, or they may have aberrations that predict better prognosis as are cases with isolated NPM-1 or CEBPA (CCAAT/enhancer binding protein alpha) mutations [27]. Among them, FLT3 and NPM-1 mutations were found to be absent in this patient. Also negative were studies for other relevant targets including t(15;17) PML-RARA, t(8;21) RUNX1-RUNX1T1, inv(16) CBFB-MYH11, and t(9,22) BCR-ABL. As mentioned before, SRSF2, ASXL1, and RUNX1 mutations, described to be present in around 50% of MCL patients and found to affect adversely response to treatment and to predict lower OS [22], were not examined in this case.

Due fundamentally to the extreme rarity of MCL, no standard treatment exists, and therapies frequently consist on those commonly used in aggressive SM, such as cladribine (2-chloro-deoxy-adenosine, 2-CDA), interferon alpha 2a (IFN-α2a), and tyrosine kinase (TK) inhibitors (TKI). As MCL is presumably a clonal disorder of hematopoietic myeloid stem cells, chemotherapy with drugs proven successful in AML, such as anthracyclines in combination with AraC, have also been used to treat patients with MCL. If hematological remission is achieved, additional therapy with curative intent involving HSCT might be attempted, as in this patient [7, 8].

The rationale behind the use of cladribine, which was the first therapy tried in our patient, is based on the value of this drug in the treatment of aggressive SM, which has been confirmed in several studies [28, 29]. However, 2-CDA had no or little activity in this case, as in most previously reported cases of MCL treated with this purine analogue [22, 30], although in rare cases transient or prolonged partial response has been observed [21, 31, 32]. Reports on the use of IFN-α2a in MCL are scarce, and the results obtained were also not encouraging [21, 31].

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors have been actively investigated for the treatment of patients with mastocytosis because KIT mutations often cause constitutive activation of TK activity of the KIT receptor [33]. Imatinib is effective in patients with increased mast cells and eosinophils associated with FIP1L1/PDGFRA (Factor Interacting with PAPOLA and CPSF/Platelet-derived growth factor receptor A) fusion gene (e.g., myeloid neoplasm with eosinophilia and rearrangement of PDGFRA) [34] or rare patients with SM associated with KIT mutations outside of exon 17 [30]. However, the results from imatinib and other TKI, such as masitinib and dasatinib, in MCL and other D816V+ SM have been disappointing [21, 3537].

Midostaurin (PKC412), a multitarget TKI, is a promising agent for patients with advanced SM, as it inhibits the growth of neoplastic MC exhibiting various mutant forms of KIT, including KIT D816V [38]. In contrast to other KIT-targeting drugs, midostaurin also impedes IgE-dependent release of histamine [39, 40]. Midostaurin has been reported to be efficacious in patients with advanced SM, including ASM and MCL [22, 41, 42]. Data from a Phase 2 single-arm open-label trial (CPKC412D2201), which included 89 with mastocytosis-related organ damage (16 with aggressive SM, 57 with SM-AHN, and 16 MCL), revealed that treatment with midostaurin 100 mg twice daily resulted in an overall response rate of 60% with a median duration of response of 24 months and a median overall survival of 29 months [42]. Unfortunately, midostaurin was not yet approved for patients with advanced SM, including MCL, and the drug was not available for compassionate use at the time the MCL was diagnosed in our patient. Brentuximab vedotin has also been considered for the treatment of patients with advanced SM. The results obtained in a small series of 4 patients with SM have suggested that this anti-CD30 monoclonal antibody-drug conjugate can induce durable responses with a manageable toxicity profile [43], and a clinical trial in patients with CD30 positive ASM and MCL is currently going on in the United States (NCT01807598). Thus, midostaurin and brentuximab vedotin may be considered alternative adjuvant therapies in case of disease relapse in our patient.

Induction chemotherapy has been used in some patients with MCL. According to the review performed by Georgin-Lavialle et al., AML-type chemotherapy was used in 6 of 51 MCL patients reported till 2013; the median survival time was 7 months, and all patients died between 2 and 29 months, because of disease progression or multiorgan failure [8]. A few cases of patients with MCL who received HSCT have also been reported, but sustained remission was not achieved in any of them [21, 4446]. Ustun et al. have reported on a retrospective series of 57 patients with SM, including SM-AHN (n = 38), ASM (n = 7) and MCL (n = 12), who received allogeneic HSCT either after myeloablative (n = 36) or nonmyeloablative reduced-intensity (n = 21) conditioning regimens [47]. Responses were observed in 70% of the patients, with complete remission in 28%. Twenty-one percent of patients had stable disease, and 9% had primary refractory disease. The best responses were obtained in SM-AHN (AML/MDS), and the worst were obtained in MCL patients. Overall survival at 3 years was 57% for all patients, 74% for patients with SM-AHN, 43% for those with ASM, and 17% for those with MCL, and the strongest risk factor for poor overall survival was MCL. Survival was also lower in patients receiving nonmyeloablative compared with myeloablative conditioning regimens and in patients having progression compared with patients having stable disease or response. Although allogeneic HSCT may be considered a potentially curative treatment for advanced SM, including MCL, its definitive role needs to be determined by prospective clinical trials. Our patient maintains hematological remission of both diseases (MCL and AML) with complete chimerism, 15 months after HLA-identical HSCT.

In summary, we described an extremely rare case of an adult female with KIT D816V+ MCL associated with normal karyotype AML without FLT3 and NPM-1 mutations, who was refractive to cladribine and who achieved complete hematological remission after receiving induction chemotherapy with idarubicin and AraC, followed by allogeneic HLA-identical sibling HSCT preceded by a reduced-intensity conditioning regimen.

Ethical Approval

The patient gave informed consent for publication of this case report and the accompanying images. Off-label prescription of cladribine was performed after obtaining authorization of the Ethical Committee and the Pharmaceutical Committee of the Hospital.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Authors’ Contributions

Marta Lopes collected data and contributed to manuscript writing. Patrícia Seabra, Vanessa Mesquita, Cláudia Casais, Renata Cabral, and Jorge Coutinho provided clinical support and were responsible for the therapeutic decisions. José-Palla Garcia and José Ramón Vizcaíno performed analysis of bone marrow trephine biopsy and immunohistochemical staining. Maria dos Anjos Teixeira contributed to flow cytometry data analysis and interpretation, and case discussion. Catarina Lau participated in flow cytometry data interpretation. Inês Freitas performed analysis of the bone marrow smears, cytomorphology, and cytochemical staining. João Rodrigues performed cytogenetic and molecular genetic studies. Maria Jara-Acevedo performed cell sorting and KIT mutation analysis. Luís Escribano was involved in data interpretation and case discussion. Alberto Orfao was involved in flow cytometry data analysis and interpretation, and in case discussion. Margarida Lima participated in flow cytometry data analysis, data interpretation and case discussion, and gave major contributions to manuscript writing. All authors read, discussed, and approved the final version of the manuscript.


  1. H. Horny, C. Akin, D. Arber et al., “Mastocytosis,” in World Health Organization Classification of Tumours Pathology & Genetics Tumours of Haematopoietic and Lymphoid Tissues, S. Swerdlow, E. Campo, N. Harris et al., Eds., International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) Press, Lyon, France, 2016. View at Google Scholar
  2. P. Valent, C. Akin, K. Hartmann et al., “Advances in the classification and treatment of mastocytosis: current status and outlook toward the future,” Cancer Research, vol. 77, no. 6, pp. 1261–1270, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. A. Matito, J. M. Morgado, I. Álvarez-Twose et al., “Serum tryptase monitoring in indolent systemic mastocytosis: association with disease features and patient outcome,” PLoS One, vol. 8, no. 10, Article ID e76116, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. J. M. Morgado, L. Sánchez-Muñoz, C. Teodósio, and L. Escribano, “Identification and immunophenotypic characterization of normal and pathological mast cells,” Methods in Molecular Biology, vol. 1192, pp. 205–226, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. C. Teodosio, A. Mayado, L. Sánchez-Muñoz et al., “The immunophenotype of mast cells and its utility in the diagnostic work-up of systemic mastocytosis,” Journal of Leukocyte Biology, vol. 97, no. 1, pp. 49–59, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. M. Arock, K. Sotlar, C. Akin et al., “KIT mutation analysis in mast cell neoplasms: recommendations of the European Competence Network on Mastocytosis,” Leukemia, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 1223–1232, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. R. Stone and S. Bernstein, “Mast cell leukemia and other mast cell neoplasms,” in Holland-Frei Cancer Medicine, D. Kufe, R. Pollock, R. Weichselbaum et al., Eds., BC Decker, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, 6th edition, 2003, View at Google Scholar
  8. S. Georgin-Lavialle, L. Lhermitte, P. Dubreuil, M.-O. Chandesris, O. Hermine, and G. Damaj, “Mast cell leukemia,” Blood, vol. 121, no. 8, pp. 1285–1295, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. P. Valent, K. Sotlar, W. R. Sperr et al., “Refined diagnostic criteria and classification of mast cell leukemia (MCL) and myelomastocytic leukemia (MML): a consensus proposal,” Annals of Oncology, vol. 25, no. 9, pp. 1691–1700, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. P. Valent, W. R. Sperr, P. Samorapoompichit et al., “Myelomastocytic overlap syndromes: biology, criteria, and relationship to mastocytosis,” Leukemia Research, vol. 25, no. 7, pp. 595–602, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. P. Valent, P. Samorapoompichit, W. R. Sperr, H.-P. Horny, and K. Lechner, “Myelomastocytic leukemia: myeloid neoplasm characterized by partial differentiation of mast cell-lineage cells,” Hematology, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 90–94, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. W. R. Sperr, J. Drach, A. W. Hauswirth et al., “Myelomastocytic leukemia: evidence for the origin of mast cells from the leukemic clone and eradication by allogeneic stem cell transplantation,” Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 11, no. 19, pp. 6787–6792, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. A. R. Arredondo, J. Gotlib, L. Shier et al., “Myelomastocytic leukemia versus mast cell leukemia versus systemic mastocytosis associated with acute myeloid leukemia: a diagnostic challenge,” American Journal of Hematology, vol. 85, no. 8, pp. 600–606, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. S. Intzes, S. Wiersma, and H. J. Meyerson, “Myelomastocytic leukemia with t(8;21) in a 3-year-old child,” Journal of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, vol. 33, no. 8, pp. e372–e375, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. A. Rich, J. Sun, A. S. Aldayel et al., “Myelomastocytic leukemia with aberrant CD25 expression: case report and review of the literature,” Clinical Lymphoma Myeloma and Leukemia, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. e173–e177, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. H.-P. Horny, K. Sotlar, A. Reiter et al., “Myelomastocytic leukemia: histopathological features, diagnostic criteria and differential diagnosis,” Expert Review of Hematology, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 431–437, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. A. C. Garcia-Montero, M. Jara-Acevedo, C. Teodosio et al., “KIT mutation in mast cells and other bone marrow hematopoietic cell lineages in systemic mast cell disorders: a prospective study of the Spanish Network on Mastocytosis (REMA) in a series of 113 patients,” Blood, vol. 108, no. 7, pp. 2366–2372, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. C. Teodosio, A. C. Garcia-Montero, M. Jara-Acevedo et al., “Mast cells from different molecular and prognostic subtypes of systemic mastocytosis display distinct immunophenotypes,” Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, vol. 125, no. 3, pp. 719.e4–726.e4, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. C. Teodosio, A. C. Garcia-Montero, M. Jara-Acevedo et al., “An immature immunophenotype of bone marrow mast cells predicts for multilineage D816V KIT mutation in systemic mastocytosis,” Leukemia, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 951–958, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. K. H. Lim, A. Tefferi, T. L. Lasho et al., “Systemic mastocytosis in 342 consecutive adults: survival studies and prognostic factors,” Blood, vol. 113, no. 23, pp. 5727–5736, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. C. G. Valentini, M. Rondoni, E. M. Pogliani et al., “Mast cell leukemia: a report of ten cases,” Annals of Hematology, vol. 87, no. 6, pp. 505–508, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. M. Jawhar, J. Schwaab, M. Meggendorfer et al., “The clinical and molecular diversity of mast cell leukemia with or without associated hematologic neoplasm,” Haematologica, vol. 102, no. 6, pp. 1035–1043, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. A. Beghini, R. Cairoli, E. Morra, and L. Larizza, “In vivo differentiation of mast cells from acute myeloid leukemia blasts carrying a novel activating ligand-independent C-kit mutation,” Blood Cells Molecules and Diseases, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 262–270, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. J. Gotlib, C. Berubé, J. D. Growney et al., “Activity of the tyrosine kinase inhibitor PKC412 in a patient with mast cell leukemia with the D816V KIT mutation,” Blood, vol. 106, no. 8, pp. 2865–2870, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. M. H. Bae, H.-K. Kim, C.-J. Park et al., “A case of systemic mastocytosis associated with acute myeloid leukemia terminating as aleukemic mast cell leukemia after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation,” Annals of Laboratory Medicine, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 125–129, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. M. L. Gulley, T. C. Shea, and Y. Fedoriw, “Genetic tests to evaluate prognosis and predict therapeutic response in acute myeloid leukemia,” Journal of Molecular Diagnostics, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 3–16, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. S. Z. Zaidi, T. Owaidah, F. Al Sharif, S. Y. Ahmed, N. Chaudhri, and M. Aljurf, “The challenge of risk stratification in acute myeloid leukemia with normal karyotype,” Hematology/Oncology and Stem Cell Therapy, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 141–158, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  28. H. C. Kluin-Nelemans, J. M. Oldhoff, J. J. van Doormaal et al., “Cladribine therapy for systemic mastocytosis,” Blood, vol. 102, no. 13, pp. 4270–4276, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. A. Pardanani, A. V. Hoffbrand, J. H. Butterfield et al., “Treatment of systemic mast cell disease with 2-chlorodeoxyadenosine,” Leukemia Research, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 127–131, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. A. Mital, A. Piskorz, K. Lewandowski et al., “A case of mast cell leukaemia with exon 9 KIT mutation and good response to imatinib,” European Journal of Haematology, vol. 86, no. 6, pp. 531–535, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. O. Penack, K. Sotlar, F. Noack et al., “Cladribine therapy in a patient with an aleukemic subvariant of mast cell leukemia,” Annals of Hematology, vol. 84, no. 10, pp. 692-693, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. F. Noack, K. Sotlar, M. Notter, E. Thiel, P. Valent, and H.-P. Horny, “Aleukemic mast cell leukemia with abnormal immunophenotype and c-kit mutation D816V,” Leukemia and Lymphoma, vol. 45, no. 11, pp. 2295–2302, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. C. Ustun, D. L. DeRemer, and C. Akin, “Tyrosine kinase inhibitors in the treatment of systemic mastocytosis,” Leukemia Research, vol. 35, no. 9, pp. 1143–1152, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. Y. Yamada and J. A. Cancelas, “FIP1L1/PDGFR alpha-associated systemic mastocytosis,” International Archives of Allergy and Immunology, vol. 152, no. 1, pp. 101–105, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. S. Georgin-Lavialle, L. Lhermitte, F. Suarez et al., “Mast cell leukemia: identification of a new c-Kit mutation, dup(501-502), and response to masitinib, a c-Kit tyrosine kinase inhibitor,” European Journal of Haematology, vol. 89, no. 1, pp. 47–52, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. K. J. Aichberger, W. R. Sperr, K. V. Gleixner et al., “Treatment responses to cladribine and dasatinib in rapidly progressing aggressive mastocytosis,” European Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 38, no. 11, pp. 869–873, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. M. S. Spector, I. Iossifov, A. Kritharis et al., “Mast-cell leukemia exome sequencing reveals a mutation in the IgE mast-cell receptor β chain and KIT V654A,” Leukemia, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 1422–1425, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. K. V. Gleixner, M. Mayerhofer, K. J. Aichberger et al., “PKC412 inhibits in vitro growth of neoplastic human mast cells expressing the D816V-mutated variant of KIT: comparison with AMN107, imatinib, and cladribine (2CdA) and evaluation of cooperative drug effects,” Blood, vol. 107, no. 2, pp. 752–759, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. M.-T. Krauth, I. Mirkina, H. Herrmann et al., “Midostaurin (PKC412) inhibits immunoglobulin E-dependent activation and mediator release in human blood basophils and mast cells,” Clinical and Experimental Allergy, vol. 39, no. 11, pp. 1711–1720, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. B. Peter, G. E. Winter, K. Blatt et al., “Target interaction profiling of midostaurin and its metabolites in neoplastic mast cells predicts distinct effects on activation and growth,” Leukemia, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 464–472, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. M. O. Chandesris, G. Damaj, D. Canioni et al., “Midostaurin in advanced systemic mastocytosis,” New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 374, no. 26, pp. 2605–2607, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. J. Gotlib, H. C. Kluin-Nelemans, T. I. George et al., “Efficacy and safety of midostaurin in advanced systemic mastocytosis,” New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 374, no. 26, pp. 2530–2541, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. U. Borate, A. Mehta, V. Reddy, M. Tsai, N. Josephson, and I. Schnadig, “Treatment of CD30-positive systemic mastocytosis with brentuximab vedotin,” Leukemia Research, vol. 44, pp. 25–31, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. T.-Y. Chen, J.-S. Chen, W.-T. Huang, W.-C. Su, and C.-J. Tsao, “Rapid engraftment of mast cells of donor origin in a case of acute myeloid leukemia with mast cell leukemia after allogeneic stem cell transplantation,” Bone Marrow Transplantation, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 111–114, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. R. Nakamura, S. Chakrabarti, C. Akin et al., “A pilot study of nonmyeloablative allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant for advanced systemic mastocytosis,” Bone Marrow Transplantation, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 353–358, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. R. Chantorn and T. Shwayder, “Death from mast cell leukemia: a young patient with longstanding cutaneous mastocytosis evolving into fatal mast cell leukemia,” Pediatric Dermatology, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 605–609, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. C. Ustun, A. Reiter, B. L. Scott et al., “Hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation for advanced systemic mastocytosis,” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 32, no. 29, pp. 3264–3274, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus