Case Reports in Pathology

Case Reports in Pathology / 2020 / Article

Case Report | Open Access

Volume 2020 |Article ID 9242305 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/9242305

Kazumori Arai, Tomohiro Iwasaki, Chinatsu Tsuchiya, Akihiro Sonoda, "Involvement of Annexin A2 Expression and Apoptosis in Reverse Polarization of Invasive Micropapillary Carcinoma of the Breast", Case Reports in Pathology, vol. 2020, Article ID 9242305, 10 pages, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/9242305

Involvement of Annexin A2 Expression and Apoptosis in Reverse Polarization of Invasive Micropapillary Carcinoma of the Breast

Academic Editor: Dimosthenis Miliaras
Received06 Mar 2020
Revised17 Jun 2020
Accepted30 Jun 2020
Published10 Jul 2020

Abstract

Invasive micropapillary carcinoma (IMPC) is characterized by pseudopapillary tumor-cell clusters with a reverse polarity (RP) floating in lacunar spaces, with aggressive biological characteristics. The RP prevention is considered to inhibit IMPC, but its pathogenic mechanisms remain unclear. Annexin A2 (ANX A2), a cell-polarity protein, is known to be involved in lumenogenesis. ANX A2 expression is immunohistochemically examined, as well as both epithelial membrane antigen (EMA) and mucin-1 glycoprotein (MUC-1), the gold-standard markers for luminal differentiation, in the background tumor components of a case of IMPC. The following findings were noticed: (1) Apoptosis was scattered with peripheral apoptotic vacuolar change; (2) EMA and MUC-1 expressions were found, rimming the peripheral apoptotic vacuoles (including the contact surface with neighboring tumor cells), and these positions corresponded to the ones with a distinct ANX A2 positivity; and (3) partially detached tumor cells showed distinct positivity of three proteins at the stroma-facing surface, which is consistent with a RP. Taken together, frequent apoptosis in tumor cells with membranous accumulation of ANX A2 is considered to be indispensable for the reverse polarization of IMPC, and that secondary necrosis following apoptosis induces the cell-polarity disorder and creates detached tumor cells with a RP.

1. Introduction

Invasive micropapillary carcinoma (IMPC) is characterized by tumor-cell clusters devoid of fibrovascular cores, floating in lacunar spaces [1, 2]. This unique breast tumor was first defined as having an “exfoliative appearance” by Fisher et al. [3] and first proposed as “invasive micropapillary carcinoma” by Siriaunkgul and Tavassoli [1]. Since then, IMPC has been reported in various organs and known to have aggressive biological characteristics, such as lymphovascular invasion and node metastasis [4]. Furthermore, the immunohistochemical analysis has demonstrated that IMPC cells show a reverse polarity (RP), i.e., an inside-out growth pattern [2, 4, 5]. The RP is a major characteristic of IMPC, whereby the luminal surface of the tumor cells faces the stroma [2, 4, 5].

In the breast, pure IMPC is rare, accounting for approximately 0.9%–2% of invasive breast cancers [2], whereas IMPC is found as one of the tumor components associated with invasive carcinoma of no special type (IC-NST) [1, 2, 6, 7]. The intrinsic type of IMPC widely varies; however, approximately half of them are luminal A type (hormone receptor-positive and HER2/neu-negative) [8]. Generally, the prognosis of IC-NST of luminal A type is known to be better than that of other intrinsic types [2]. Nevertheless, the IMPC component has been reported to adversely affect the prognosis of breast cancer even if it is not dominant [7]. Whether a micropapillary (MP) phenotype of the breast is an independent prognostic factor remains debatable [2, 710]. However, IMPC also has been known to have a high proclivity to locoregional recurrence [9, 10]. The RP prevention is considered to inhibit the occurrence of MP component in breast cancer, but its pathogenic mechanisms remain unclear [6]. The MP morphological formation has been shown to occur in tumor cells with both high apoptosis and low proliferation in the ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast [11]. We believe that IMPC will be inhibited depending on an understanding of the protein(s) involved in the reverse polarization.

Annexins (ANXs) are a multigene family of calcium-related and membrane-binding proteins that show cell-specific expression [12]. Twelve human ANX subtypes (A1–A11 and A13) have been described, and each ANX is distributed differentially and has varied functions in cellular processes, such as calcium signaling, cytoskeletal organization, growth regulation, cell division, and apoptosis [12]. Annexin A2 (ANX A2), a 36 kDa protein, is involved in diverse cellular functions, such as cell motility/invasion, cell polarity, cell adhesion, and apoptosis, within the cytoplasm and plasma membranes [13]. Moreover, in glandular epithelial cells, this protein is involved in lumenogenesis, that is, the establishment of apical polarity [14, 15]. We hypothesized that ANX A2 may also be involved in a RP and encountered a case of IMPC that helped elucidate the reverse polarization in IC-NST. In this case report, we immunohistochemically examined the localization of ANX A2 and also investigated the expressions of both epithelial membrane antigen (EMA) and mucin-1 glycoprotein (MUC-1), the gold-standard markers for luminal differentiation [4, 5].

2. Case Presentation

A 56-year-old woman presented with a dimpling breast lump for 6 months. She had no family history of breast and other cancers. Physical examination revealed a discrete mass at the middle inner quadrant of the right breast. Mammography showed a high-density mass of 2.3 cm in diameter with segmental microcalcifications and specular borders that caused slight skin retraction (Figure 1(a)). Ultrasound demonstrated an ill-circumscribed and hypoechoic mass of in size with decreased posterior echo (Figure 1(b)). Enhanced computed tomography suggested multiple metastases to the right axillary lymph nodes. No metastasis to the other organs was noted. Core needle biopsy revealed an IC-NST with IMPC components. Furthermore, fine needle aspiration cytology from the right axillary lymph node detected adenocarcinoma, indicating metastasis. Radical mastectomy with lymph node dissection was performed about 1.5 months after her first visit. Postoperatively, the patient received various chemotherapy treatment for 9 months, such as 4 cycles of epirubicin and cyclophosphamide, 4 cycles of docetaxel, and 25 cycles of radiation. Then, antihormonal therapy with letrozole has been administered to date, without signs of recurrence during the follow-up period of 14 months.

To examine reverse polarization, the histopathology of the background IC-NST that is regarded as the origin of IMPC components was examined. Immunohistochemistry was performed with serial tissue sections, using Leica Bond-Max (Leica Biosystems, Australia). The characterization and staining protocol of each antibody for ANX A2 (catalogue number, 610068) and MUC-1 (catalogue number, NCL-MUC-1) have been described previously [16, 17]. Mouse anti-human EMA antibody (clone, GP 1.4; catalogue number, NCL-EMA; Leica Microsystems, UK) was used at a dilution ratio of 1 : 500, after a 10 min heat antigen retrieval with a citrate-based solution (pH 6.0). To detect apoptosis, the mouse monoclonal antibody M30 CytoDEATH (clone, M30; catalogue number, 12 140 322 001; Roche Diagnostics, Germany) was used at a 1 : 100 dilution ratio, after a 20 min heat antigen retrieval with an EDTA-based solution (pH 9.0). This antibody detects caspase cleavage products of cytokeratin subtype 18 in apoptotic glandular epithelial cells, including adenocarcinoma cells, and is considered to be more specific and reliable than the TUNEL assay [18].

3. Pathological Findings

Macroscopic examination showed that the tumor was a solid mass of in size, with an irregular margin (Figure 2(a)). Microscopic findings also revealed that majority of the tumor exhibited IC-NST with tubular formation (Figure 2(b)), and IMPC components were mixed during the transition in histology (Figures 2(b) and 2(c)). The total amount of tumor-cell clusters with typical MP morphology was approximately 20% of the tumor components. The tumor showed a histological grade of 2 (tubular formation, 2; nuclear atypia, 3; and mitosis, 1) [2]. Immunohistochemically, over 90% of the tumor cells tested positive for estrogen and progesterone receptors (estrogen receptor: clone, 6F11; catalogue number, NCL-L-ER-6F11; progesterone receptor: clone, 16; catalogue number, NCL-L-PGR-312; Leica Microsystems), respectively (Figures 3(a) and 3(b)), but negative at score 0 for HercepTest™ (catalogue number, SK001; DakoCytomation, Denmark) (Figure 3(c)). Based on these immunohistochemical results, the intrinsic type of the tumor under study corresponded to luminal A type [2]. The Ki-67 (clone, MIB-1; catalogue number, M 7240; DAKO) index was relatively low, approximately 30% (Figure 3(d)) [10]. The tumor revealed lymphatic invasion, and a total of 9 node metastases were detected during the level I axillary dissection.

3.1. Histopathological Findings of the Background IC-NST

Concentrated vacuoles were partially or circumferentially found at the periphery of each tumor component (Figure 4(a)). In some vacuoles, apoptotic bodies and cells were found (Figure 4(b)). Regarding immunohistochemistry for M30 CytoDEATH, positive reactions were widespread mainly at the periphery of the background tumor components (Figure 4(c)) and corresponded to apoptotic bodies and cells (Figure 4(d)). Furthermore, the positive reactions were observed at the rim of the peripheral vacuoles (Figure 4(d)). Apoptotic bodies and cells were also observed inside the tumor-cell nests, and pseudolumens were scattered (Figure 5(a)). In some tumor components, clear spaces without septa were found, considering partial tumor-cell detachment from the stroma (Figure 5(b)). Moreover, some of the detached tumor cells showed serrated peripheral borders (Figure 5(c)). Inflammatory cell infiltration was inconspicuous in the tumor components (Figures 4 and 5).

3.2. Immunohistochemical Findings of the Background IC-NST

Luminal surface constantly showed a distinct positivity for all three antigens: ANX A2, EMA, and MUC-1 (Figures 69). In contrast, several contact surface membranes represented a weak positivity for ANX A2 but were negative for EMA and MUC-1 (Figure 6). On the contrary, the immunoreactivity of peripheral vacuoles was significant, regardless of the size and numbers of vacuoles. In vacuoles with weak positivity for ANX A2, the distinct positivity for neither EMA nor MUC-1 could be detected (Figure 6). Conversely, in vacuoles with clear positivity for ANX A2, the distinct positivity for both EMA and MUC-1 was detected at the corresponding positions to the ANX A2 positivity. Furthermore, positive reactions for three antigens were found, rimming the individual vacuoles, including the contact surface with neighboring tumor cells (Figures 7 and 8). These reactions represented a shadow-like appearance of the cells leaving only the surface membrane, suggesting that the vacuoles are derived from apoptotic tumor cells. The ANX A2 positivity was also faintly observed even at the rims of the vacuoles in the sites without distinct positivity for both EMA and MUC-1 (Figure 6). The above clear positivity for ANX A2 was also observed in the intercellular membranes between tumor cells neighboring the vacuoles; however, the distinct positivity for neither EMA nor MUC-1 could be detected at the corresponding positions (Figure 8). In partially detached tumor cells, positive reactions for three antigens were found at the stroma-facing surface, representing a partial RP (Figure 9). In IMPC, the rims of the tumor-cell clusters showed the circumferential staining for three antigens (Figure 10).

4. Discussion

To our knowledge, apoptosis has been reported to be associated with completed MP components [1921], whereas no reports have demonstrated the involvement of apoptosis in the process of MP morphology formation in invasive breast cancer. In the tumor under study, the background IC-NST showed histological findings consistent with those suggested in a previous report on DCIS [11]. The immunopositivity for M30 CytoDEATH at the rim of the vacuoles suggests that these vacuoles are shadows of apoptotic tumor cells. We consider that frequent apoptosis is also the initial step of MP morphology formation in the IMPC of the breast [11].

ANX A2 has been known to be deposited in the cell membranes that become a lumen in the future and accumulated in the luminal surface, being combined with apical polarity protein complex [14, 15]. In the present tumor, ANX A2 immunolocalization in the background IC-NST was consistent with the above ANX A2 dynamics [14, 15, 22]. Generally, lumenogenesis occurs between cells that contact each other [14, 15, 23]. Therefore, the distinct positivity for ANX A2 at the contact surface between peripheral vacuoles and neighboring tumor cells indicates ANX A2 accumulation on the surface membranes of both apoptotic and neighboring tumor cells [14, 15, 2325]. In other words, the vacuoles are considered as the remaining cell membranes of the former tumor cells that were supposed to form the lumen in collaboration with the neighboring tumor cells [14, 15, 2325]. Frequent apoptosis in the tumor cells with membranous ANX A2 accumulation is considered to be indispensable for reverse polarization [11, 14, 15, 2325].

In some cancers, ANX A2 has been reported to inhibit tumor-cell apoptosis [26]. In the tumor under study, the cause of widespread apoptosis in tumor cells expressing ANX A2 remains unclear. In IMPC, the inhibitory function of ANX A2 on apoptosis may be impaired.

Secondary necrosis following apoptosis disappears even in the remaining cell membranes [24, 25]. Secondary necrosis of the apoptotic tumor cells with luminal differentiation is considered to partially create detached tumor cells with a RP [11, 14, 15, 2325]. The partial RP is suggested to be a part of the IMPC spectrum in breast cancer [27, 28], and serrated peripheral borders shown in detached tumor cells are known as one of the characteristics of IMPC [29]. The MP morphology is assumed to be a unique tumor-cell condition in which those with an apical polarity could form the luminal surface facing the stroma [14, 15, 24, 25, 27, 28]. Whether lacunar space of IMPC is a shrinkage artifact or not remains controversial [1, 2, 27, 28]. However, several investigators have suggested that the space is not just an artifact but is intrinsically related to the biological features of IMPC [27, 28]. The lacunar space is also considered to significantly originate from secondary necrosis [24, 25, 27, 28].

Cell-stroma adhesion is known to be involved in both creation and maintenance of an apical–basal polarity of the cell in cooperation with cell–cell contacts [14, 15, 23]. Accordingly, both frequent apoptosis and secondary necrosis are considered to disturb the apical–basal polarity of the tumor cells everywhere, resulting in a condition resembling to partially polarized structures with dysplastic features [2325]. In other words, a focal RP is likely to occur everywhere at the background IC-NST due to frequent apoptosis [14, 15, 2325, 27, 28]. In detached tumor cells, the basal polarity is supposed to be impaired by loss of cell-stroma adhesion [23, 30]. Therefore, even detached tumor cells without luminal differentiation might acquire an apical polarity on the stroma-facing surface, under the effects of cell–cell contacts with the neighboring tumor cells with an apical polarity [23].

At the intercellular membranes between the tumor cells and neighboring peripheral vacuoles, a discrepancy in immunoreactivity was observed between ANX A2 and both EMA and MUC-1. If findings at those sites suggest the preluminal stage, that is, a preapical patch or a stage before its formation [14, 15, 23], neither EMA nor MUC-1 may possibly be detected in cell membranes with distinct ANX A2 positivity. Further examinations are needed to confirm this consideration.

Some investigators have reported that MUC-1 might promote tumor-cell detachment and MP morphology formation in IMAC [4, 28, 31]. However, in this tumor, the apoptotic peripheral vacuoles, as tumor-cell detachment preparations, were scattered, regardless of MUC-1 immunoreactivity. We consider that the MUC-1 involvement in the initial step of the MP morphology formation is lower than that of frequent apoptosis. Rather, MUC-1 might contribute to preventing the surface membrane of detached tumor cells from reattaching to the stroma [32].

In conclusion, the following findings were notable for reverse polarization in IMPC: (1) frequent apoptosis in the lumenogenic tumor cells with a membranous accumulation of ANX A2; (2) partially detached tumor cells with a RP, which are derived from secondary necrosis of apoptotic tumor cells with luminal differentiation. This study had some limitations because only one case was examined. Further investigations are needed to confirm our suppositions.

Ethical Approval

Ethical approval for this study was provided by the ethics committee of Shizuoka General Hospital.

Written informed consent to publish the case details was obtained from the patient.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Enago (http://www.enago.jp/) for providing the English language review.

References

  1. S. Siriaunkgul and F. A. Tavassoli, “Invasive micropapillary carcinoma of the breast,” Modern Pathology, vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 660–662, 1993. View at: Google Scholar
  2. WHO Classification of Tumours Editorial Board, WHO Classification of Tumours: Breast Tumours, International Agency for Research on Cancer Press, Lyon, France, 5th edition, 2019.
  3. E. R. Fisher, A. S. Palekar, C. Redmond, B. Barton, and B. Fisher, “Pathologic findings from the national surgical adjuvant breast project (protocol no. 4). Vi. Invasive papillary cancer,” American Journal of Clinical Pathology, vol. 73, no. 3, pp. 313–322, 1980. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. H. Nassar, V. Pansare, H. Zhang et al., “Pathogenesis of invasive micropapillary carcinoma: role of MUC1 glycoprotein,” Modern Pathology, vol. 17, no. 9, pp. 1045–1050, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. G. Cserni, “Reversed polarity of the glandular epithelial cells in micropapillary carcinoma of the large intestine and the EMA/MUC1 immunostain,” Pathology, vol. 46, no. 6, pp. 527–532, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. Y. L. Yang, B. B. Liu, X. Zhang, and L. Fu, “Invasive micropapillary carcinoma of the breast: an update,” Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, vol. 140, no. 8, pp. 799–805, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. L. Chen, Y. Fan, R.-g. Lang et al., “Breast carcinoma with micropapillary features: clinicopathologic study and long-term follow-up of 100 cases,” International Journal of Surgical Pathology, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 155–163, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. G. D. Lewis, Y. Xing, W. Haque et al., “Prognosis of lymphotropic invasive micropapillary breast carcinoma analyzed by using data from the National Cancer Database,” Cancer Communications, vol. 39, no. 1, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. Y. Wu, N. Zhang, and Q. Yang, “The prognosis of invasive micropapillary carcinoma compared with invasive ductal carcinoma in the breast: a meta-analysis,” BMC Cancer, vol. 17, no. 1, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. S. L. Tang, J. Q. Yang, Z. G. Du et al., “Clinicopathologic study of invasive micropapillary carcinoma of the breast,” Oncotarget, vol. 8, no. 26, pp. 42455–42465, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. E. Boghaert, D. C. Radisky, and C. M. Nelson, “Lattice-based model of ductal carcinoma in situ suggests rules for breast cancer progression to an invasive state,” PLoS Computational Biology, vol. 10, no. 12, article e1003997, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. V. Gerke, C. E. Creutz, and S. E. Moss, “Annexins: linking Ca2+ signalling to membrane dynamics,” Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 449–461, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. A. K. Grindheim, J. Saraste, and A. Vedeler, “Protein phosphorylation and its role in the regulation of annexin A2 function,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 1861, no. 11, pp. 2515–2529, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. A. Datta, D. M. Bryant, and K. E. Mostov, “Molecular regulation of lumen morphogenesis,” Current Biology, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. R126–R136, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. A. Roman-Fernandez and D. M. Bryant, “Complex polarity: building multicellular tissues through apical membrane traffic,” Traffic, vol. 17, no. 12, pp. 1244–1261, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. T. Domoto, Y. Miyama, H. Suzuki et al., “Evaluation of S100A10, annexin II and B-FABP expression as markers for renal cell carcinoma,” Cancer Science, vol. 98, no. 1, pp. 77–82, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. K. Arai and M. Hirose, “Annexin A2 expression in aerogenous metastasis of pulmonary invasive mucinous adenocarcinoma: a case report including immunohistochemical analysis,” Case Reports in Oncological Medicine, vol. 2019, Article ID 5064852, 7 pages, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. W. R. Duan, D. S. Garner, S. D. Williams, C. L. Funckes-Shippy, I. S. Spath, and E. A. G. Blomme, “Comparison of immunohistochemistry for activated caspase-3 and cleaved cytokeratin 18 with the TUNEL method for quantification of apoptosis in histological sections of PC-3 subcutaneous xenografts,” The Journal of Pathology, vol. 199, no. 2, pp. 221–228, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. V. Barresi, G. Branca, A. Ieni, L. Rigoli, G. Tuccari, and R. A. Caruso, “Phagocytosis (cannibalism) of apoptotic neutrophils by tumor cells in gastric micropapillary carcinomas,” World Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 21, no. 18, pp. 5548–5554, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. M. Patankar, S. Väyrynen, A. Tuomisto, M. Mäkinen, S. Eskelinen, and T. J. Karttunen, “Micropapillary structures in colorectal cancer: an anoikis-resistant subpopulation,” Anticancer Research, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 2915–2921, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. L. Huang, H. Ji, L. Yin et al., “High expression of plakoglobin promotes metastasis in invasive micropapillary carcinoma of the breast via tumor cluster formation,” Journal of Cancer, vol. 10, no. 12, pp. 2800–2810, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. K. Arai, T. Iwasaki, A. Sonoda, and A. Endo, “Membranous overexpression of S100A10 is associated with a high-grade cellular status of breast carcinoma,” Medical Molecular Morphology, vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 104–114, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. A. Manninen, “Epithelial polarity - Generating and integrating signals from the ECM with integrins,” Experimental Cell Research, vol. 334, no. 2, pp. 337–349, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. U. Ziegler and P. Groscurth, “Morphological features of cell death,” Physiology, vol. 19, pp. 124–128, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. Y. Zhang, X. Chen, C. Gueydan, and J. Han, “Plasma membrane changes during programmed cell deaths,” Cell Research, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 9–21, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. C. Y. Wang, Y. S. Lin, W. C. Su, C. L. Chen, and C. F. Lin, “Glycogen synthase kinase-3 and Omi/HtrA2 induce annexin a2 cleavage followed by cell cycle inhibition and apoptosis,” Molecular Biology of the Cell, vol. 20, no. 19, pp. 4153–4161, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. G. Acs, G. Paragh, S. T. Chuang, C. Laronga, and P. J. Zhang, “The presence of micropapillary features and retraction artifact in core needle biopsy material predicts lymph node metastasis in breast carcinoma,” The American Journal of Surgical Pathology, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 202–210, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. G. Acs, N. N. Esposito, Z. Rakosy, C. Laronga, and P. J. Zhang, “Invasive ductal carcinomas of the breast showing partial reversed cell polarity are associated with lymphatic tumor spread and may represent part of a spectrum of invasive micropapillary carcinoma,” The American Journal of Surgical Pathology, vol. 34, no. 11, pp. 1637–1646, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. M. Paterakos, W. G. Watkin, S. M. Edgerton, D. H. Moore II, and A. D. Thor, “Invasive micropapillary carcinoma of the breast: a prognostic study,” Human Pathology, vol. 30, no. 12, pp. 1459–1463, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. K. Kamiya, Y. Hayashi, J. Douguchi et al., “Histopathological features and prognostic significance of the micropapillary pattern in lung adenocarcinoma,” Modern Pathology, vol. 21, no. 8, pp. 992–1001, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. M. Verdu, R. Roman, M. Calvo et al., “Clinicopathological and molecular characterization of colorectal micropapillary carcinoma,” Modern Pathology, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 729–738, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. J. Wesseling, S. W. Van der Valk, H. L. Vos, A. Sonnenberg, and J. Hilkens, “Episialin (MUC1) overexpression inhibits integrin-mediated cell adhesion to extracellular matrix components,” The Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 129, no. 1, pp. 255–265, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2020 Kazumori Arai et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder
Views899
Downloads392
Citations

Related articles

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.