Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine

Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine / 2016 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2016 |Article ID 5647182 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/5647182

Nathalia N. R. Cardoso, Celuta S. Alviano, Arie F. Blank, Maria Teresa V. Romanos, Beatriz B. Fonseca, Sonia Rozental, Igor A. Rodrigues, Daniela S. Alviano, "Synergism Effect of the Essential Oil from Ocimum basilicum var. Maria Bonita and Its Major Components with Fluconazole and Its Influence on Ergosterol Biosynthesis", Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, vol. 2016, Article ID 5647182, 12 pages, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/5647182

Synergism Effect of the Essential Oil from Ocimum basilicum var. Maria Bonita and Its Major Components with Fluconazole and Its Influence on Ergosterol Biosynthesis

Academic Editor: José L. Ríos
Received21 Dec 2015
Accepted06 Apr 2016
Published05 May 2016


The aim of this study was to evaluate the activity of the EO and its major components of Ocimum basilicum var. Maria Bonita, a genetically improved cultivar, against the fluconazole sensitive and resistant strains of Candida albicans and Cryptococcus neoformans. Geraniol presented better results than the EO, with a low MIC (76 μg/mL against C. neoformans and 152 μg/mL against both Candida strains). The combination of EO, linalool, or geraniol with fluconazole enhanced their antifungal activity, especially against the resistant strain (MIC reduced to 156, 197, and 38 μg/mL, resp.). The ergosterol assay showed that subinhibitory concentrations of the substances were able to reduce the amount of sterol extracted. The substances tested were able to reduce the capsule size which suggests they have an important mechanism of action. Transmission electron microscopy demonstrated cell wall destruction of C. neoformans after treatment with subinhibitory concentrations. In C. albicans ultrastructure alterations such as irregularities in the membrane, presence of vesicles, and cell wall thickening were observed. The biofilm formation was inhibited in both C. albicans strains at MIC and twice MIC. These results provide further support for the use of O. basilicum EO and its major components as a potential source of antifungal agents.

1. Introduction

Candidiasis is a fungal disease that affects a large number of individuals. Skin or mucous membranes are the most common sites of infection, especially the mouth and vagina [1]. However, the disease may evolve from a superficial infection to systemic infection, especially in immunocompromised individuals [2, 3]. The most frequent etiological agent of candidiasis is Candida albicans. This pathogen is an opportunistic fungus able to form biofilms, which are of major clinical concern. Moreover, fungi communities structured in extracellular polysaccharide matrices possess increased resistance to antifungal therapy [3, 4].

C. neoformans is responsible for cryptococcosis, a disease affecting the central nervous system and having high levels of mortality. C. neoformans has several well-characterized virulence factors such as capsular polysaccharide, sialic acids, and the production of mannitol and melanin. The former is considered the most important virulence factor of C. neoformans and therefore the most studied. The capsule contributes to the microorganism virulence through multiple mechanisms, including antiphagocytic properties and adverse effects on the host immune system [5, 6].

Despite current antifungal therapies, cryptococcal and candidal infections show unpleasant high mortality rates in immunocompromised individuals. A study conducted by Park et al. [7] revealed that cryptococcal meningitis was responsible for 624,700 deaths after 3 months of infection. A previous case-control study indicated that mortality attributable to invasive Candida infection was about 19–24% among hospitalized patients [8]. Factors that contribute to this scenario include a limited antifungal arsenal, diverse side effects, and drug resistant strains [1].

Essential oils (EOs) and plant extracts are commonly used in traditional medicine by indigenous populations worldwide [9, 10]. EOs are complex mixtures of volatile (terpenes, aliphatic aldehydes, alcohols, and esters) and nonvolatile components (hydrocarbons, fatty acids, sterols, carotenoids, waxes, coumarins, and flavonoids) produced by aromatic plants as secondary metabolites [11]. Various studies have attributed different biological activities to EOs such as antiviral, antigiardial, antispasmodic, carminative, analgesic, healing, expectorant, antiseptic, respiratory tract, and anti-inflammatory activities [1216].

Ocimum basilicum (Lamiaceae) is found in tropical and subtropical regions of Asia, Africa, Central America, and South America [17]. Popularly known as basil, O. basilicum is a culinary and medicinal herb widely used in folk medicine to combat headaches, coughs, intestinal worms, and kidney disorders and as an antispasmodic agent [18]. The antimicrobial activity of basil EO has been reported to be predominantly associated with its major components, linalool and methyl chavicol [19]. The antimicrobial activity of these components and other monoterpenes has been reported in the literature against various microorganisms, including protozoans, bacteria, and fungi [2023]. The purpose of this study was to investigate the antifungal activity of the essential oil and its major components (linalool and geraniol) from a genetically improved O. basilicum cultivar (O. basilicum var. Maria Bonita) against C. neoformans and fluconazole (FLC) sensitive and resistant C. albicans strains.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Chemicals

Fluconazole (FLC), resazurin, 2,3-bis(2-methoxy-4-nitro-5sulfofenil)-5-[(phenylamino)carbonyl]-2H-tetrazolium hydroxide (XTT), 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT), linalool (97%), and geraniol (98%) standards were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (USA) and stored according to the supplier’s instructions. All solvents used were of spectroscopic grade from Tedia (Fairfield, OH, USA).

2.2. Plant Material and Essential Oil

Ocimum basilicum L. var. “Maria Bonita” is a genetically improved cultivar with a high content of linalool. O. basilicum EO was provided by the Federal University of Sergipe, where a voucher specimen was deposited (register number 13162). EO was extracted from the leaves by hydrodistillation using a Clevenger apparatus. The chemical composition of the EO was analyzed by a GC-MS and previously published by Da Costa et al. [24] and linalool was identified as the major component of the EO (75.22%), followed by geraniol (14.66%).

2.3. Microorganisms

Cryptococcus neoformans T-444 serotype A was provided by Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP). C. albicans FLC resistant strain was isolated from the oral cavity of a pediatric patient infected with HIV and C. albicans (7173 serotype B) and was kindly provided by Hospital Evandro Chagas/FIOCRUZ/RJ. The microorganisms were maintained in Sabouraud dextrose agar for 48 h at room temperature.

2.4. Macrophage Culture

Macrophage cell line RAW 264.7 was purchased from the Rio de Janeiro cell bank. Cells were grown in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) supplemented with 2 mM L-glutamine, 50 μg/mL gentamicin, and 2.5 μg/mL Fungizone, plus 10% of heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS) and maintained at 37°C in an atmosphere of 5% CO2.

2.5. Evaluation of Inhibitory Concentrations

The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) was determined using the microdilution broth method according to CLSI M27-A [25]. First, the O. basilicum EO and linalool and geraniol standards were serially diluted into 96-well plates in duplicates. Then 100 μL of cell suspension (103 yeast/mL) was added to each well and the plate was incubated at room temperature for 24 or 48 h. Positive controls were prepared using yeast inoculated growth medium (untreated cells). Pure medium was used for the negative controls. Growth inhibition was confirmed after the addition of 30 μL of resazurin solution (5 mg/100 mL of phosphate buffer saline, PBS; pH 7.2) and further incubation at 37°C for 3 h. FLC was used as the antimicrobial standard drug. MIC was defined as the lowest concentration of the EO, linalool, and geraniol that completely invalidated the microorganism growth.

2.6. Synergism Assay with the Antifungal Standard Drug FLC

The synergistic effect of the EO, linalool, and geraniol on FLC antifungal activity was performed as previously described by Zore et al. [23], with slight modifications. FLC and O. basilicum EO or its major components (linalool and geraniol) were combined at concentrations lower than their individual MIC values into 96-well microplates. Each plate was inoculated with 103 cells/mL and incubated at room temperature for 24 h or 48 h, according to the requirements of the microorganisms. The results were based on visual growth, which were confirmed with the addition of resazurin as described above. Fractional inhibitory concentrations (FICs) for each substance and in their combination with FLC were calculated as follows:

The was calculated by adding both FIC values. values <0.5 and >4.0 have synergistic and antagonistic interactions, respectively [26].

2.7. Determination of the Amount of Ergosterol

Sterol extraction was performed as previously reported by Arthington-Skaggs et al. [27], with a slight modification. A single C. albicans or C. neoformans colony from an overnight Sabouraud dextrose agar plate culture was inoculated in 50 mL of Sabouraud dextrose broth containing different concentrations of the EO, linalool, and geraniol (625, 395, and 38 μg/mL for C. neoformans and 625, 395, and 76 μg/mL for C. albicans, resp.). C. albicans and C. neoformans cultures were incubated at 37°C for 18 and 24 h, respectively, with shaking. The cells were harvested by centrifugation and washed with sterile water. The wet weight of the cell pellet was determined. Three milliliters of 25% alcoholic potassium hydroxide solution (25 g of KOH and 36 mL of sterile distilled water, brought to 100 mL with 100% ethanol) was added and mixed by vortex for 1 min. Cell suspensions were incubated in a water bath at 85°C for 1 h. After the incubation period, the tubes were cooled at room temperature. The extraction of the sterols was carried out by the addition of 1 mL of sterile distilled water and 3 mL of cyclohexane and then mixing by vortex for 3 min. The cyclohexane layer was transferred to a clean borosilicate glass tube. Then, 200 μL aliquot of sterol extract was diluted fivefold in 100% ethanol and scanned spectrophotometrically between 200 and 300 nm (DU 530 Life Science UV/Visible Spectrophotometer, Beckman Coulter) [27].

Both 24(28)-dehydroergosterol (24(28) DHE, a late sterol pathway intermediate) and ergosterol absorb at 281.5 nm, but only 24(28) DHE shows an absorption spectrum at 230 nm. Ergosterol content was calculated as a percentage of the wet weight of the cells using the following equations: % ergosterol + % 24(28) DHE = []/pellet weight; % 24(28) DHE = []/pellet weight, and % ergosterol = [% ergosterol + % 24(28) DHE]% 24(28) DHE, where is the factor for dilution in ethanol and 290 and 518 are the values determined for crystalline ergosterol and 24(28) DHE, respectively [28].

2.8. Antibiofilm Formation Activity

The effects of the O. basilicum EO, linalool, and geraniol against C. albicans biofilm formation were evaluated. In order to assure better yeast adhesion, 96-well microplates were pretreated with 100 μL of fetal bovine serum (FBS) for 30 minutes at 37°C. The microplates were washed with PBS and then 100 μL of C. albicans suspension (1 × 107 cells/mL) in YNB (yeast nitrogen base) broth, supplemented with 2% glucose, pH 7.0, was inoculated into the wells and incubated at 37°C for 90 min. Nonadherent cells were removed by washing the microplates twice with PBS, and then 100 μL of different concentrations of the EO, linalool, and geraniol was added to the wells (final concentrations at one- and twofold MIC). After 48 h incubation at 35°C, the medium was removed and the biofilm was washed with PBS [29]. The untreated biofilms were used as positive control.

Biofilm quantification was made by the cellular reduction of salt XTT. First, 150 μL of XTT-menadione solution (12.5 μg/mL of XTT + 0.17 μg/mL of menadione) in PBS was added to each well, and then the microplates were incubated for 2 h at 35°C in the dark. After the incubation period, 100 μL from each well was transferred to another 96-well microplate and the optical density was determined at 475 nm (SpectraMax M5, Molecular Devices, USA) [29].

2.9. Transmission Electron Microscopy

C. neoformans, FLC sensitive, and resistant C. albicans strains were treated with subinhibitory concentrations of the EO (625 μg/mL for all microorganisms) and geraniol (38 μg/mL for C. neoformans and 76 μg/mL for both C. albicans strains) for 48 h at 37°C. The yeasts were washed in PBS, pH 7.2, and fixed in a solution of 2.5% glutaraldehyde and 4% formaldehyde in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer, pH 7.2, for 1 h at room temperature. Next, the yeasts were postfixed for 2 h in 1% osmium tetroxide containing 1.25% potassium ferrocyanide and 5 mM CaCl2 in cacodylate buffer, pH 7.2. The yeasts were then washed in the same buffer, dehydrated with increasing ethanol concentrations (30, 50, 70, 90, and 100% and ultradry ethanol), with the cells remaining in each concentration for 30 min, and then embedded in Spurr resin. Ultrathin sections were stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate, and images were obtained using a Zeiss 900 electron microscope equipped with a CCD Camera (mega view III model, Soft Image System, Germany). The images were processed with iTEM software (Soft Image System, Germany).

2.10. C. neoformans Capsule Size

C. neoformans was incubated for 48 h at 35°C in the presence of subinhibitory concentrations of EO, linalool, and geraniol (625, 395, and 38 μg/mL, resp.). After 48 h, an aliquot was removed and fixed with a formaldehyde solution (10% formaldehyde in PBS) to measure capsule sizes. Slides were prepared for measurements with a drop of cells and a drop of India ink dye to enable capsule visualization. The images were obtained using a Zeiss Axioplan microscope. Measurements were performed using ImageJ software considering the distance between the cell wall and the outer edge of the capsule. Each cell was measured in four different regions to obtain the average capsule size. Thirty cells were analyzed for each condition.

2.11. Cytotoxicity

Cytotoxicity was assessed via MTT reduction as previously described [30]. Several concentrations of O. basilicum EO, linalool, and geraniol ranging from 5000 to 310 μg/mL, 3156 to 197 μg/mL, and 612 to 38.3 μg/mL, respectively, were placed in contact with the RAW cell cultures and incubated at 37°C for 24 h. Next, 10 μL of MTT solution was added to cell cultures and incubated for 3 h at 37°C. The formazan crystals formed were solubilized by adding 100 μL of dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO). The absorbance was determined at 490 nm in an automatic spectrophotometer (ELx800TMBio-TeK Instruments, Inc.). The 50% cytotoxic concentration (CC50) was defined as the compound concentration which caused a 50% reduction in the number of viable cells.

3. Results and Discussion

The results of minimum inhibitory concentrations are shown in Table 1. The MIC values found for the EO against C. neoformans, C. albicans sensitive, and C. albicans resistant strain were similar (1250 μg/mL). Geraniol was the most effective compound against all the strains tested (76 μg/mL against C. neoformans and 152 μg/mL against the two C. albicans strains tested). However, different results were observed with linalool. The MIC for linalool was 790 μg/mL against C. neoformans and C. albicans sensitive and 1580 μg/mL against the C. albicans fluconazole resistant strain. Our preliminary results with MIC corroborate with reports in the literature that show antimicrobial properties of extracts and essential oils of other natural products and their major components [3137].

StrainMIC (µg/mL)MIC in combination (µg/mL)

C. neoformans12507907631.254.146250.633
C. albicans resistant125015801525001.011560.127
C. albicans sensitive12507901520.9750.2593120.51

L: linalool; G: geraniol; FLC: fluconazole;  FIC index: fractional inhibitory concentration index; I: indifferent; S: synergist.

These results encouraged us to evaluate the combination of EO, linalool, and geraniol with a standard drug. Previous works have reported that the combination of different antifungal agents or the combination of natural products and standard drugs could reduce their separate MIC values. Liu et al. [38] showed that the combination of FLC and glabridin, an isoflavan isolated from Glycyrrhiza glabra, reduced the MIC values of C. neoformans, indicating a synergistic effect. Faria et al. [39] found a synergistic effect in the combination of 2,5-dihydroxybenzaldehyde and FLC against C. neoformans. In this work, we evaluate the effect of EO and its major components (geraniol and linalool) with the reference drug FLC and the combination of the two major components against C. neoformans. All the combinations tested produced values ranging from 0.3826 to 0.6326. This showed that all these combinations reduced the MIC values. The synergistic effect was observed in the combination of FLC and geraniol, reducing their MIC from 31.25 to 4.14 μg/mL and 76 to 19 μg/mL, respectively, and in the combination of linalool with geraniol, reducing their MIC values from 790 to 111 μg/mL and 76 to 19 μg/mL, respectively. When FLC was combined with 197 μg/mL linalool and 625 μg/mL EO, their MIC values were reduced from 31.25 to 8.054 and 4.14 μg/mL in the respective combinations (Table 1). It is important to note that, in combination, the needed concentrations of the two major components together to completely eradicate C. neoformans were very low. No combination of O. basilicum EO and commercial antifungal agents against C. neoformans was found in the literature consulted.

For the Candida albicans strains all the combinations tested produced values ranging from 0.127 to 0.57. Although all the combinations reduced the MIC values in at least one of the paired substances, we did not observe any synergistic effect in the combinations of natural components with FLC against C. albicans sensitive. However, a synergistic effect was observed in the combination of linalool with geraniol, reducing their MIC values from 790 to 105 μg/mL and 152 to 38 μg/mL, respectively. Furthermore, all combinations tested presented synergistic effect against C. albicans resistant. When FLC was combined with EO 156 μg/mL, its MIC value was reduced from 500 to 1.01 μg/mL. The combination of FLC with 197 μg/mL linalool and 38 μg/mL geraniol reduced its MIC value from 500 to 2.02 μg/mL and to 1.04 μg/mL, respectively. This is a significant result because when the high concentrations of the standard drugs are reduced the collateral effects are also reduced. Moreover, the combination of linalool and geraniol caused complete cellular inhibition at reduced MICs of 4.8 μg/mL and 397 μg/mL for geraniol and linalool, respectively (Table 1). These results corroborate with previously reported results that show the synergistic effect of geraniol and FLC against C. albicans [22]. However, when compared with our study, a higher concentration of geraniol (140 μg/mL) was necessary to reduce the MIC value of FLC from 64 to 2 μg/mL.

In order to investigate the mechanisms of action of EO, linalool, and geraniol, we analyzed the inhibition of ergosterol synthesis. Ergosterol is an important sterol presented in the yeast cell membrane that controls membrane fluidity and integrity, and it is an important target for some antifungals [4042]. The treatment of C. neoformans with EO (625 μg/mL), linalool (395 μg/mL), and geraniol (38 μg/mL) results in an inhibition of 79, 57, and 25% of ergosterol synthesis, respectively (Figure 1(a)). Even in subinhibitory concentrations, the substances tested were able to reduce the ergosterol content. This is an indication that they might act in the ergosterol biosynthesis pathway, especially the EO and linalool.

The treatment of C. albicans sensitive with EO (625 μg/mL), linalool (395 μg/mL), and geraniol (76 μg/mL) resulted in an inhibition of 63, 38, and 38% of ergosterol synthesis, respectively. A similar effect was obtained with C. albicans resistant (Figure 1(b)). These data corroborate with those reported by Khan et al. In that study, the treatment with O. sanctum essential oil and linalool was also able to decrease ergosterol synthesis in C. albicans [43]. However, in another study, geraniol and linalool were not effective in reducing the ergosterol content in C. albicans, even at higher concentrations (4 mg/mL and 8 mg/mL, resp.) [44].

Another mechanism of action analyzed in this study was the ability of the studied components to reduce the capsule size of C. neoformans. The capsule is the major virulence factor of C. neoformans and it is an important target of study [45]. In the sub-MIC concentrations tested, linalool showed the highest activity in reducing the capsule size, followed by EO, and geraniol was the least active (Figure 2). The presence of capsules can alter the susceptibility of antimicrobial drugs; therefore, finding natural products that reduce capsule size is extremely important. The results here suggest that the three substances tested can reduce the capsule size; and therefore they might be used with other antimicrobial drugs to reduce the concentration needed and consequently its collateral effects. Vitale et al. tested the activity of antifungal agents against strains of C. neoformans with different capsule sizes. They showed that the presence of capsules affects the susceptibility of the yeast to the antimicrobial tested [46].

The activity of the EO, linalool, and geraniol against C. albicans biofilm formation was evaluated and the EO was the most effective. At 2x, its MIC value geraniol appears to be more effective against C. albicans sensitive biofilm formation than C. albicans resistant. EO showed the highest biofilm inhibitory activity against both C. albicans strains at MIC followed by linalool and geraniol, respectively (Figure 3). Alviano et al. demonstrated that the essential oil of Croton cajucara and purified linalool were effective against artificial biofilms of C. albicans [47]. A previous study showed that the essential oil of Boesenbergia pandurata, with a high content of geraniol (56.68%) and 2.36% of linalool, was able to interfere in the initial phases of Candida biofilm formation [48]. Another study showed a strong antimicrobial activity of the essential oil of O. americanum L. against the planktonic form of C. albicans but a less pronounced effect on these microorganisms in biofilms [49]. The biofilm inhibitory activities of linalool and geraniol obtained in the present study are consistent with those described by Dalleau et al., who demonstrated that geraniol was the most effective substance against C. albicans biofilm [50].

In order to observe the ultrastructural changes in the C. neoformans strain after treatment with EO, linalool, and geraniol, the treated and untreated cells, grown for 48 h at 37°C, were processed for transmission electron microscopy. Untreated cells (control) showed good preservation of cell walls and membrane and the final of budding (Figures 4(a)–4(c)). The cells treated with 625 μg/mL of EO (Figure 4(d)), 38 μg/mL of geraniol (Figure 4(e)), and 395 μg/mL of linalool (Figure 4(f)) showed a disruption of the fungal capsule structure.

The control (untreated) C. albicans sensitive strain cells showed good preservation of their cell walls and membranes (Figures 5(a) and 5(b)). Cells treated with 625 μg/mL of EO presented cell wall thickening (Figures 5(c) and 5(d)) and the treatment with 76 μg/mL of geraniol led to the appearance of cell membrane invaginations presenting some vesicles and the thickening of the cell walls (Figures 5(e) and 5(f)). The control cells of C. albicans fluconazole resistant strain showed good preservation of the membrane, cell wall, and small vesicles near the membrane (Figures 6(a) and 6(b)). However, yeasts treated with subinhibitory concentrations of EO and geraniol showed cell wall thickening and irregularities in the membrane (Figures 6(c) and 6(d)). Cells treated with a subinhibitory concentration of geraniol presented cell wall thickening and irregularities in the cell membrane, suggesting budding failure (Figures 6(e) and 6(f)).

In Figure 7, the transmission electron microscopy of C. albicans fluconazole resistant strain treated with FLC alone and in combination with geraniol and EO exhibited a synergistic activity with FLC. FLC treated with 1 μg/mL cells has irregularity in the membrane and formation of small vesicles in the proximity (Figures 7(a) and 7(b)). Treated with the combination of essential oil 156 μg/mL and FLU 1 μg/mL cells presented a very thick cell wall and membrane invaginations (Figures 7(c) and 7(d)). Cells treated with the combination of geraniol 38 μg/mL and FLU 1 μg/mL showed large irregularities in the membrane and formation of membrane vesicles in the cytoplasm (Figures 7(e) and 7(f)).

The cytotoxic activities of essential oil, geraniol, and linalool were analyzed on a RAW cell line and showed CC50 at a concentration of 380 μg/mL for geraniol and less than 310 μg/mL and 197 μg/mL (the lowest concentrations evaluated) for essential oil and linalool, respectively. According to this, the MIC values found for geraniol were much lower than the CC50. Using the checkerboard, MIC values of linalool and EO were reduced to 105 and 156 μg/mL, respectively, in some combinations, which can minimize the cytotoxic activity of these components.

4. Conclusions

In this study we showed that geraniol displayed the highest activity against C. neoformans and the strains of C. albicans tested and the lowest cytotoxicity, when compared with linalool and the EO The ergosterol inhibition and the synergism showed the potential activity of this natural product and that its combination with standard drugs can be useful against the microorganisms tested. The anticryptococcal activity described here encourages the search for more effective substances of vegetal origin for the treatment of cryptococcosis.

Besides the antifungal activity described here the results support the use of O. basilicum essential oil as a folk medicine and open perspectives to find more effective substances from vegetal origin for the treatment of fungal diseases.


See Table 1.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.


The present work was supported by Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq), Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES), Financiadora de Estudos e Projetos (FINEP), Fundação de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (FAPERJ), and Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ).


  1. C. G. Pierce and J. L. Lopez-Ribot, “Candidiasis drug discovery and development: new approaches targeting virulence for discovering and identifying new drugs,” Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery, vol. 8, no. 9, pp. 1117–1126, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. S. Biswas, P. V. Dijck, and A. Datta, “Environmental sensing and signal transduction pathways regulating morphopathogenic determinants of Candida albicans,” Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews, vol. 71, no. 2, pp. 348–376, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. S. E. Herwald and C. A. Kumamoto, “Candida albicans niche specialization: features that distinguish biofilm cells from commensal cells,” Current Fungal Infection Reports, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 179–184, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. G. Ramage, R. Rajendran, L. Sherry, and C. Williams, “Fungal biofilm resistance,” International Journal of Microbiology, vol. 2012, Article ID 528521, 14 pages, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. T. L. Doering, “How sweet it is! Cell wall biogenesis and polysaccharide capsule formation in Cryptococcus neoformans,” Annual Review of Microbiology, vol. 63, pp. 223–247, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. O. Zaragoza, M. L. Rodrigues, M. De Jesus, S. Frases, E. Dadachova, and A. Casadevall, “The capsule of the fungal pathogen Cryptococcus neoformans,” Advances in Applied Microbiology, vol. 68, pp. 133–216, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  7. B. J. Park, K. A. Wannemuehler, B. J. Marston, N. Govender, P. G. Pappas, and T. M. Chiller, “Estimation of the current global burden of cryptococcal meningitis among persons living with HIV/AIDS,” AIDS, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 525–530, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. J. Morgan, M. I. Meltzer, B. D. Plikaytis et al., “Excess mortality, hospital stay, and cost due to candidemia: a case-control study using data from population-based candidemia surveillance,” Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 540–547, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. A. Gurib-Fakim, “Medicinal plants: traditions of yesterday and drugs of tomorrow,” Molecular Aspects of Medicine, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 1–93, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. S. Zielińska and A. Matkowski, “Phytochemistry and bioactivity of aromatic and medicinal plants from the genus Agastache (Lamiaceae),” Phytochemistry Reviews, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 391–416, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. M. Jalali-Heravi and H. Parastar, “Recent trends in application of multivariate curve resolution approaches for improving gas chromatography–mass spectrometry analysis of essential oils,” Talanta, vol. 85, no. 2, pp. 835–849, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. J. Bruneton, Pharmacognosy, Phytochemistry and Medicinal Plants, Intercept, Andover, Mass, USA, 2nd edition, 1999.
  13. N. P. Jones, J. T. Arnason, M. Abou-Zaid, K. Akpagana, P. Sanchez-Vindas, and M. L. Smith, “Antifungal activity of extracts from medicinal plants used by first nations peoples of eastern canada,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 73, no. 1-2, pp. 191–198, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. D. Lopes-Lutz, D. S. Alviano, C. S. Alviano, and P. P. Kolodziejczyk, “Screening of chemical composition, antimicrobial and antioxidant activities of Artemisia essential oils,” Phytochemistry, vol. 69, no. 8, pp. 1732–1738, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. G. B. Melo, R. L. Silva, V. A. Melo et al., “Effect of the aqueous extract of Hyptis pectinata on liver mitochondrial respiration,” Phytomedicine, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 359–362, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. J. L. Ríos and M. C. Recio, “Medicinal plants and antimicrobial activity,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 100, no. 1-2, pp. 80–84, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. Z. Zakaria, R. Aziz, Y. L. Lachimanan, S. Sreenivasan, and X. Rathinam, “Antioxidant activity of Coleus blumei, Orthosiphon stamineus, Ocimum basilicum and Mentha arvensis from lamiaceae family,” International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship, vol. 2, pp. 93–95, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  18. S.-J. Lee, K. Umano, T. Shibamoto, and K.-G. Lee, “Identification of volatile components in basil (Ocimum basilicum L.) and thyme leaves (Thymus vulgaris L.) and their antioxidant properties,” Food Chemistry, vol. 91, no. 1, pp. 131–137, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. B. Bozin, N. Mimica-Dukic, N. Simin, and G. Anackov, “Characterization of the volatile composition of essential oils of some Lamiaceae spices and the antimicrobial and antioxidant activities of the entire oils,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 54, no. 5, pp. 1822–1828, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. I. De Almeida, D. S. Alviano, D. P. Vieira et al., “Antigiardial activity of Ocimum basilicum essential oil,” Parasitology Research, vol. 101, no. 2, pp. 443–452, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. R. Kotan, S. Kordali, and A. Cakir, “Screening of antibacterial activities of twenty-one oxygenated monoterpenes,” Zeitschrift für Naturforschung C, vol. 62, no. 7-8, pp. 507–513, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  22. G. B. Zore, A. D. Thakre, V. Rathod, and S. M. Karuppayil, “Evaluation of anti-Candida potential of geranium oil constituents against clinical isolates of Candida albicans differentially sensitive to fluconazole: inhibition of growth, dimorphism and sensitization,” Mycoses, vol. 54, no. 4, pp. e99–e109, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. G. B. Zore, A. D. Thakre, S. Jadhav, and S. M. Karuppayil, “Terpenoids inhibit Candida albicans growth by affecting membrane integrity and arrest of cell cycle,” Phytomedicine, vol. 18, no. 13, pp. 1181–1190, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. A. S. Da Costa, M. F. Arrigoni-Blank, M. A. A. P. Da Silva et al., “The impact of hybridization on the volatile and sensorial profile of Ocimum basilicum L,” The Scientific World Journal, vol. 2014, Article ID 824594, 8 pages, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institutes (CLSI), Methods for Dilution Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests, Approved Standard, Norms M27-A, CLSI, Wayne, Pa, USA, 4th edition, 2008.
  26. F. C. Odds, “Synergy, antagonism, and what the chequerboard puts between them,” Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, vol. 52, article 1, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. B. A. Arthington-Skaggs, H. Jradi, T. Desai, and C. J. Morrison, “Quantitation of ergosterol content: novel method for determination of fluconazole susceptibility of Candida albicans,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 37, no. 10, pp. 3332–3337, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  28. O. N. Breivik and J. L. Owades, “Spectrophotometric semimicrodetermination of ergosterol in yeast,” Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 360–363, 1957. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. B. P. Krom, J. B. Cohen, G. E. McElhaney Feser, and R. L. Cihlar, “Optimized candidal biofilm microtiter assay,” Journal of Microbiological Methods, vol. 68, no. 2, pp. 421–423, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. T. Mosmann, “Rapid colorimetric assay for cellular growth and survival: application to proliferation and cytotoxicity assays,” Journal of Immunological Methods, vol. 65, no. 1-2, pp. 55–63, 1983. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. D. Q. Falcão, E. R. Costa, D. S. Alviano, C. S. Alviano, R. M. Kuster, and F. S. Menezes, “Effect of drying time on the essential oil content of Ocimum basilicum L and its antimicrobial activity,” Pharmacologyonline, vol. 1, pp. 1–6, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  32. R. L. Fabri, E. S. Coimbra, A. C. Almeida et al., “Essential oil of Mitracarpus frigidus as a potent source of bioactive compounds,” Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências, vol. 84, no. 4, pp. 1073–1080, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. Y. Silva-Belmares, C. Rivas-Morales, E. Viveros-Valdez, M. G. de la Cruz-Galicia, and P. Carranza-Rosales, “Antimicrobial and cytotoxic activities from Jatropha dioica roots,” Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 748–750, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. N. Chaftar, M. Girardot, N. Quellard et al., “Activity of six essential oils extracted from Tunisian plants against Legionella pneumophila,” Chemistry and Biodiversity, vol. 12, no. 10, pp. 1565–1574, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. I. C. Marinas, E. Oprea, M. C. Chifiriuc, I. A. Badea, M. Buleandra, and V. Lazar, “Chemical composition and antipathogenic activity of Artemisia annua essential oil from Romania,” Chemistry and Biodiversity, vol. 12, no. 10, pp. 1554–1564, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. E. S. Dezaki, H. Mahmoudvand, F. Sharififar, S. Fallahi, L. Monzote, and F. Ezatkhah, “Chemical composition along with anti-leishmanial and cytotoxic activity of Zataria multiflora,” Pharmaceutical Biology, vol. 54, no. 5, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. P. Satyal, S. Shrestha, and W. N. Setzer, “Composition and bioactivities of an (E)-β-farnesene chemotype of chamomile (Matricaria chamomilla) essential oil from Nepal,” Natural Product Communications, vol. 10, no. 8, pp. 1453–1457, 2015. View at: Google Scholar
  38. W. Liu, L. P. Li, J. D. Zhang et al., “Synergistic antifungal effect of glabridin and fluconazole,” PLoS ONE, vol. 9, no. 7, Article ID e103442, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. N. C. G. Faria, J. H. Kim, L. A. P. Gonçalves, M. D. L. Martins, K. L. Chan, and B. C. Campbell, “Enhanced activity of antifungal drugs using natural phenolics against yeast strains of Candida and Cryptococcus,” Letters in Applied Microbiology, vol. 52, no. 5, pp. 506–513, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. T. C. White, K. A. Marr, and R. A. Bowden, “Clinical, cellular, and molecular factors that contribute to antifungal drug resistance,” Clinical Microbiology Reviews, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 382–402, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  41. V. T. Andriole, “Current and future antifungal therapy: new targets for antifungal agents,” Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 151–162, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. K. S. De Lira Mota, F. De Oliveira Pereira, W. A. De Oliveira, I. O. Lima, and E. De Oliveira Lima, “Antifungal activity of Thymus vulgaris L. essential oil and its constituent phytochemicals against Rhizopus oryzae: interaction with ergosterol,” Molecules, vol. 17, no. 12, pp. 14418–14433, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. A. Khan, A. Ahmad, F. Akhtar et al., “Ocimum sanctum essential oil and its active principles exert their antifungal activity by disrupting ergosterol biosynthesis and membrane integrity,” Research in Microbiology, vol. 161, no. 10, pp. 816–823, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. S. B. Rajput and S. Mohan Karuppayil, “Small molecules inhibit growth, viability and ergosterol biosynthesis in Candida albicans,” SpringerPlus, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–6, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. O. Zaragoza, R. Garcia-Rodas, J. D. Nosanchuk, M. Cuenca-Estrella, J. L. Rodríguez-Tudela, and A. Casadevall, “Fungal cell gigantism during mammalian infection,” PLoS Pathogens, vol. 6, no. 6, Article ID e1000945, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. R. G. Vitale, V. Pascuccelli, and J. Afeltra, “Influence of capsule size on the in vitro activity of antifungal agents against clinical Cryptococcus neoformans var. grubii strains,” Journal of Medical Microbiology, vol. 61, no. 3, pp. 384–388, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. W. S. Alviano, R. R. Mendonça-Filho, D. S. Alviano et al., “Antimicrobial activity of Croton cajucara Benth linalool-rich essential oil on artificial biofilms and planktonic microorganisms,” Oral Microbiology and Immunology, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 101–105, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. S. Taweechaisupapong, S. Singhara, P. Lertsatitthanakorn, and W. Khunkitti, “Antimicrobial effects of Boesenbergia pandurata and Piper sarmentosum leaf extracts on planktonic cells and biofilm of oral pathogens,” Pakistan Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 224–231, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  49. S. Thaweboon and B. Thaweboon, “In vitro antimicrobial activity of Ocimum americanum L. essential oil against oral microorganisms,” Southeast Asian Journal of Tropical Medicine and Public Health, vol. 40, no. 5, pp. 1025–1033, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  50. S. Dalleau, E. Cateau, T. Bergès, J.-M. Berjeaud, and C. Imbert, “In vitro activity of terpenes against Candida biofilms,” International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents, vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 572–576, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2016 Nathalia N. R. Cardoso et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.