Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Education Research International
Volume 2012 (2012), Article ID 105246, 10 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/105246
Research Article

Developing Self-Regulation by Using Reflective Support in a Video-Digital Microteaching Environment

School of Education, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan 52900, Israel

Received 11 December 2011; Revised 20 March 2012; Accepted 13 April 2012

Academic Editor: Mariel F. Musso

Copyright © 2012 Zehavit Kohen and Bracha Kramarski. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education, Professional Standards for the Accreditation of Schools, Colleges, and Departments of Education, National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education, Washington, DC, USA, 2002.
  2. B. Kramarski and T. Michalsky, “Investigating preservice teachers' professional growth in self-regulated learning environments,” Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 101, no. 1, pp. 161–175, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. B. J. Zimmerman, “Investigating self-regulation and motivation: historical background, methodological developments, and future prospects,” American Educational Research Journal, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 166–183, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. D. L. Butler and S. C. Cartier, “Multiple complementary methods for understanding self-regulated learning as situated in context,” in Proceedings of the AERA Annual Conference, Montreal, Canada, 2005.
  5. P. R. Pintrich, “The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning,” in Handbook of Self-Regulation, M. Boekaerts and P. R. Pintrich, Eds., pp. 13–39, Academic Press, San Diego, Calif, USA, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  6. G. Schraw, K. J. Crippen, and K. Hartley, “Promoting self-regulation in science education: metacognition as part of a broader perspective on learning,” Research in Science Education, vol. 36, no. 1-2, pp. 111–139, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. P. H. Winne and A. F. Hadwin, “Studying as self-regulated learning,” in Metacognition in Educational Theory and Practice, D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, and A. Graesser, Eds., pp. 277–304, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, USA, 1998. View at Google Scholar
  8. M. V. J. Veenman, B. H. A. M. Van Hout-Wolters, and P. Afflerbach, “Metacognition and learning: conceptual and methodological considerations,” Metacognition and Learning, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 3–14, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. M. Boekaerts and E. Cascallar, “How far have we moved toward the integration of theory and practice in self-regulation?” Educational Psychology Review, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 199–210, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. B. J. Zimmerman, “Self-efficacy: an essential motive to learn,” Contemporary Educational Psychology, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 82–91, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. B. Kramarski and T. Michalsky, “Preparing preservice teachers for self-regulated learning in the context of technological pedagogical content knowledge,” Learning and Instruction, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 434–447, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. N. E. Perry, L. Phillips, and L. R. Hutchinson, “Mentoring student teachers to support self-regulated learning,” Elementary School Journal, vol. 106, no. 3, pp. 237–254, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  13. J. Randi and L. Corno, “Teacher innovations in self-regulated learning,” in Handbook of Self-Regulation, M. Boekaerts, P. Pintrich, and M. Zeidner, Eds., pp. 651–685, Academic Press, Orlando, Fla, USA, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  14. A. Zohar, Higher Order Thinking in Science Classrooms: Students' Learning and Teacher' Professional Development, Kluwer Academic, Dodrecht, The Netherlands, 2004.
  15. M. Boekaerts and L. Corno, “Self-regulation in the classroom: a perspective on assessment and intervention,” Applied Psychology, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 199–231, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. B. Kramarski and T. Michalsky, “Preparing preservice teachers for self-regulated learning in the context of technological pedagogical content knowledge,” Learning and Instruction, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 434–447, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. B. Kramarski and Z. R. Mevarech, “Enhancing mathematical reasoning in the classroom: the effects of cooperative learning and metacognitive training,” American Educational Research Journal, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 281–310, 2003. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. R. T. Putnam and H. Borko, “What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning?” Educational Research, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 4–15, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  19. M. Bannert, “Metacognitive prompting: design and effects when learning with hypermedia,” in Proceedings of the AERA Annual Conference, 2008.
  20. M. Boekaerts, “Self-regulated learning: where we are today,” International Journal of Educational Research, vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 445–457, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. M. V. J. Veenman, B. H. A. M. Van Hout-Wolters, and P. Afflerbach, “Metacognition and learning: conceptual and methodological considerations,” Metacognition and Learning, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 3–14, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. D. A. Schön, The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action, Basic Books, New York, NY, USA, 1983.
  23. K. Zeichner, “Changing directions in the practicum: looking ahead to the 1990's,” Journal of Education for Teaching, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 105–131, 1990. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. D. L. Butler, H. N. Lauscher, S. Jarvis-Selinger, and B. Beckingham, “Collaboration and self-regulation in teachers' professional development,” Teaching and Teacher Education, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 435–455, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. L. Corno and J. Randi, “A design theory for classroom instruction,” in Instructional-Design Theories and Models: A New Paradigm of Instructional Theory, C. M. Reigeluth, Ed., vol. 2, chapter 13, Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, USA, 1999. View at Google Scholar
  26. K. Green, “No novice teacher left behind: guiding novice teachers to improve decision-making through structured questioning,” Perspectives on Urban Education, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  27. R. Tanner, D. Longayroux, D. Beijaard, and Verloop N., “Piloting portfolios: using portfolios in pre-service teacher education,” ELT Journal, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 20–30, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. D. Cruickshank, “Uses and benefits of reflective teaching,” The Phi Delta Kappan, vol. 66, no. 10, pp. 704–706, 1985. View at Google Scholar
  29. D. S. McCurry, “Technology for critical pedagogy: beyond self-reflection with video,” in Proceedings of the Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (SITE '00), vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 6–11, San Diego, Calif, USA, 2000.
  30. N. D. Bell, “Microteaching: what is it that is going on here?” Linguistics and Education, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 24–40, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. D. K. Meyer and J. C. Turner, “Using instructional discourse analysis to study the scaffolding of student self-regulation,” Educational Psychologist, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 17–25, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. R. Azevedo, J. G. Cromley, and D. Seibert, “Does adaptive scaffolding facilitate students' ability to regulate their learning with hypermedia?” Contemporary Educational Psychology, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 344–370, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. D. F. Kauffman, R. Zhao, and Y. S. Yang, “Effects of online note taking formats and self-monitoring prompts on learning from online text: using technology to enhance self-regulated learning,” Contemporary Educational Psychology, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 313–322, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. E. A. Davis, “Prompting middle school science students for productive reflection: generic and directed prompts,” Journal of the Learning Sciences, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 91–142, 2003. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. D. F. Kauffman, X. Ge, K. Xie, and C. H. Chen, “Prompting in web-based environments: supporting self-monitoring and problem solving skills in college students,” Journal of Educational Computing Research, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 115–137, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. B. Kramarski and N. Mizrachi, “Online discussion and self-regulated learning: effects of instructional methods on mathematical literacy,” Journal of Educational Research, vol. 99, no. 4, pp. 218–229, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. J. A. Greene and R. Azevedo, “The measurement of learners' self-regulated cognitive and metacognitive processes while using computer-based learning environments,” Educational Psychologist, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 203–209, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. G. Schraw, “Measuring self-regulation in computer-based learning environments,” Educational Psychologist, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 258–266, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. P. H. Winne and N. E. Perry, “Measuring self-regulated learning,” in Handbook of Self-Regulation, M. Boekaerts, P. Pintrich, and M. Zeidner, Eds., pp. 531–566, Academic Press, Orlando, Fla, USA, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  40. P. H. Winne and J. C. Nesbit, “Supporting self-regulated learning with cognitive tools,” in Handbook of Metacognition in Education, D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, and A. C. Graesser, Eds., pp. 259–277, Routledge, New York, NY, USA, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  41. P. R. Pintrich, D. A. F. Smith, T. Garcia, and W. J. McKeachie, “Reliability and predictive validity of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ),” Educational and Psychological Measurement, vol. 53, pp. 801–813, 1993. View at Google Scholar
  42. B. J. Zimmerman and M. Martinez-Pons, “Development of a structured interview for assessing students’ use of self-regulated learning strategies,” American Educational Research Journal, vol. 23, pp. 614–628, 1986. View at Google Scholar
  43. B. J. Zimmerman and M. Martinez Pons, “Construct validation of a strategy model of student self-regulated learning,” Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 80, no. 3, pp. 284–290, 1988. View at Google Scholar
  44. P. H. Winne and D. Jamieson-Noel, “Exploring students’ calibration of self reports about study tactics and achievement,” Contemporary Educational Psychology, vol. 27, pp. 551–572, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  45. B. J. Zimmerman, “Becoming a self-regulated learner: an overview,” Theory into Practice, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 64–70, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. G. Schraw and R. S. Dennison, “Assessing metacognitive awareness,” Contemporary Educational Psychology, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 460–475, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. D. L. Ball, “Content knowledge for teaching, what makes it special?” Journal of Teacher Education, vol. 59, no. 5, pp. 389–407, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  48. L. Shulman, “Those who understand: knowledge growth in teaching,” Educational Researcher, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 4–14, 1986. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  49. D. A. Schön, “The new scholarship requires a new epistemology,” Change, vol. 27, pp. 26–34, 1995. View at Google Scholar
  50. H. J. Hartman, “Teaching metacognitively,” in Metacognition in Learning and Instruction: Theory, Research and Practice, H. J. Hartman, Ed., pp. 33–68, Kluwer, Boston, Mass, USA, 2001. View at Google Scholar
  51. B. Kramarski and M. Gutman, “How can self-regulated learning be supported in mathematical E-learning environments?” Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 24–33, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. N. E. Perry, “Young Children's self-regulated learning and contexts that support it,” Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 90, no. 4, pp. 715–729, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. M. V. J. Veenman, “The assessment and instruction of self-regulation in computer-based environments: a discussion,” Metacognition and Learning, vol. 2, no. 2-3, pp. 177–183, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus