Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Education Research International
Volume 2013, Article ID 457250, 8 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/457250
Research Article

Metacognitive Instruction: Global and Local Shifts in Considering Listening Input

1Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
2Department of English, Qaemshahr Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qaemshahr, Iran

Received 28 January 2013; Accepted 13 April 2013

Academic Editor: Gwo-Jen Hwang

Copyright © 2013 Hossein Bozorgian and Ebrahim Fakhri Alamdari. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. H. Bozorgian, “Metacognitive instruction does improve listening comprehension,” ISRN Education, vol. 2012, Article ID 734085, 6 pages, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  2. J. Cross, “Metacognitive instruction for helping less-skilled students,” English Language Teachers Journal, vol. 65, no. 4, pp. 408–416, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  3. J. Field, “Skills and strategies: towards a new methodology for listening,” English Language Teachers Journal, vol. 52, no. 2, p. 110, 1998. View at Google Scholar
  4. C. Goh and Y. Taib, “Metacognitive instruction in listening for young learners,” English Language Teachers Journal, vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 222–232, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. S. Graham, “Listening comprehension: the learners' perspective,” System, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 165–182, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. T. Lynch, “Theoretical perspectives on listening,” Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, vol. 18, pp. 3–19, 1998. View at Google Scholar
  7. D. Mendelsohn, “Listening comprehension: we've come a long way, but…,” Contact, vol. 27, pp. 33–40, 2001. View at Google Scholar
  8. L. Vandergrift and M. H. Tafaghodtari, “Teaching L2 learners how to listen does make a difference: an empirical study,” Language Learning, vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 470–497, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. M. C. Wang, G. D. Haertel, and H. J. Walberg, “What helps students learn?” Educational Leadership, vol. 51, pp. 74–79, 1994. View at Google Scholar
  10. J. Provo, Teaching World Issues, Daily Yomiuri Newspaper, Tokyo, Japan, 1993.
  11. A. C. Kip, “Teaching for a better world: Global issues and language education,” Human Rights Education in Asian Schools, pp. 41–52, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  12. C. Goh, “Metacognitive awareness and second language students,” English Language Teachers Journal, vol. 51, pp. 361–369, 1997. View at Google Scholar
  13. A. U. Chamot, “Cognitive instruction in the second language classroom,” in Linguistics, Language Teaching and Language Acquisition: The Interdependence of Theory, Practice and Research, J. E. Alatis, Ed., pp. 496–513, Georgetown University Press, Washington, DC, USA, 1990. View at Google Scholar
  14. C. Goh, “A cognitive perspective on language learners' listening comprehension problems,” System, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 55–75, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. J. R. Anderson, Cognitive Psychology and Its Implications, Freeman, New York, NY, USA, 4th edition, 1995.
  16. K. Carrier, “Improving high school English language learners' second language listening through strategy instruction,” Bilingual Research Journal, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 383–408, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  17. L. Vandergrift, “Recent development in second and foreign language listening comprehension research,” Language Teaching, vol. 40, pp. 191–210, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  18. J. Field, “Promoting perception: lexical segmentation in second language listening,” English Language Teachers Journal, vol. 57, pp. 325–334, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  19. Iran Language Institute, “Internet + English = Netglish,” 2009, http://www.ili.ir/. View at Google Scholar
  20. J. Field, “Guest editor's introduction Emergent and divergent: a view of second language listening research,” System, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 2–9, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. C. Goh, “Metacognitive instruction for second language listening development: theory, practice and research implications,” RELC Journal, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 188–213, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. H. Bozorgian and H. Pillay, “Enhancing foreign language learning through listening strategy delivered in L1: an experimental study,” International Journal of Instruction, vol. 6, pp. 105–122, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  23. E. Macaro, Learning Strategies in Second and Foreign Language Classrooms, Continuum, London, UK, 2001.
  24. A. C. S. Chang and J. Read, “The effects of listening support on the listening performance of EFL learners,” TESOL Quarterly, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 375–397, 2006. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. A. S. Hasan, “Learners' perceptions of listening comprehension problems,” Language, Culture and Curriculum, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 137–153, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  26. J. H. Flavell, “Metacognitive aspects of problem solving,” in The Nature of Intelligence, L. B. Resnick, Ed., pp. 231–236, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, USA, 1976. View at Google Scholar
  27. J. H. Flavell, “Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: a new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry,” American Psychologist, vol. 34, no. 10, pp. 906–911, 1979. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. L. Vandergrift, “Listening to learn or learning to listen?” Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, vol. 24, pp. 3–25, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  29. L. Vandergrift and C. Goh, Teaching and Learning Second Language Listening: Metacognition in Action, Tylor & Frances Group. New York, NY, USA; Rutledge, Oxon, UK, 2012.
  30. M. V. J. Veenman, B. H. A. M. van Hout-Wolters, and P. Afflerbach, “Metacognition and learning: conceptual and methodological considerations,” Metacognition and Learning, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 3–14, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. S. Kvale, Interviews, Sage, London, UK, 1996.
  32. L. Cohen, L. Manion, and K. Morrison, Research Methods in Education, Routledge, London, UK, 6th edition, 2007.
  33. V. Braun and V. Clarke, “Using thematic analysis in psychology,” Qualitative Research in Psychology, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 77–101, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus