Research Article

Test Accessibility: Item Reviews and Lessons Learned from Four State Assessments

Table 4

Accessibility ratings for science items by state.

GradeNumber of itemsItem analysis rubric ratingsOverall analysis rubric ratings
PassageItem stimulusItem stemVisualsAnswer choicesPage/Item layout
M (SD)M (SD)M (SD)M (SD)M (SD)M (SD)M (SD)

State A21ā€”2.9 (0.8)3.0 (0.8)3.7 (0.5)3.1 (0.8)3.6 (0.7)2.8 (0.6)
State B603.4 (0.5)3.0 (0.7)3.2 (0.7)3.0 (0.9)2.8 (0.8)3.5 (0.6)2.7 (0.7)
State C1013.4 (0.6)3.0 (0.6)3.1 (0.7)3.0 (1.1)3.0 (0.7)3.3 (0.6)2.7 (0.5)
State D1002.5 (0.6)3.6 (0.6)3.0 (0.7)2.8 (1.0)2.7 (0.7)3.0 (0.7)2.5 (0.5)

Accessibility ratings should be interpreted as follows: 4 = maximally accessible for nearly all test takers; 3 = maximally accessible for most test takers; 2 = maximally accessible for some test takers; 1 = inaccessible for many test takers.