Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Education Research International
Volume 2015 (2015), Article ID 826734, 11 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/826734
Research Article

Effects of Students’ Effort Scores in a Structured Inquiry Unit on Long-Term Recall Abilities of Content Knowledge

Z-MNU (Centre of Math & Science Education), Institute of Biology Didactics, University of Bayreuth, University Campus, NWI, 95447 Bayreuth, Germany

Received 1 October 2014; Revised 13 January 2015; Accepted 22 January 2015

Academic Editor: Eddie Denessen

Copyright © 2015 Sarah Schmid and Franz X. Bogner. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. H. W. Marsh and R. G. Craven, “Reciprocal effects of self-concept and performance from a multidimensional perspective: beyond seductive pleasure and unidimensional perspectives,” Perspectives on Psychological Science, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 133–163, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  2. B. A. Greene, T. K. DeBacker, B. Ravindran, and A. J. Krows, “Goals, values, and beliefs as predictors of achievement and effort in high school mathematics classes,” Sex Roles, vol. 40, no. 5-6, pp. 421–458, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. R. Garner, “When children and adults do not use learning strategies: toward a theory of settings,” Review of Educational Research, vol. 60, no. 4, pp. 517–529, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  4. C. Ames and J. Archer, “Achievement goals in the classroom: Students' learning strategies and motivation processe,” Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 80, no. 3, pp. 260–267, 1988. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. R. E. Yager, “The constructivist learning model: towards real reform in science education,” The Science Teacher, vol. 58, no. 6, pp. 52–57, 1991. View at Google Scholar
  6. J. S. Eccles, A. Wigfield, and U. Schiefele, “Motivation to succeed,” in Handbook of Child Psychology, N. Eisenberg and W. Damon, Eds., John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 5th edition, 1998. View at Google Scholar
  7. J. D. Nichols, “Empowerment and relationships: a classroom model to enhance student motivation,” Learning Environments Research, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 149–161, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. S. Schmid and F. X. Bogner, “Does inquiry-learning support long-term memory?” in Proceedings of the 10th Conference of European Researchers in Didactics of Biology (ERIDOB '14), Haifa, Israel, 2014.
  9. M. C. Linn, E. A. Davis, and P. Bell, Eds., Internet Environments for Science Education, Routledge, London, UK, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2004.
  10. M. R. Blanchard, S. A. Southerland, J. W. Osborne, V. D. Sampson, L. A. Annetta, and E. M. Granger, “Is inquiry possible in light of accountability?: a quantitative comparison of the relative effectiveness of guided inquiry and verification laboratory instruction,” Science Education, vol. 94, no. 4, pp. 577–616, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. P. A. Kirschner, J. Sweller, and R. E. Clark, “Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: an analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching,” Educational Psychologist, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 75–86, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. C. E. Hmelo-Silver, R. G. Duncan, and C. A. Chinn, “Scaffolding and achievement in problem-based and inquiry learning: a response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006),” Educational Psychologist, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 99–107, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. R. E. Mayer, “Should there be a three-strikes rule against pure discovery learning?” American Psychologist, vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 14–19, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. J. R. Staver and M. Bay, “Analysis of the project synthesis goal cluster orientation and inquiry emphasis of elementary science textbooks,” Journal of Research in Science Teaching, vol. 24, no. 7, pp. 629–643, 1987. View at Google Scholar
  15. American Association for the Advancement of Science, Benchmarks for Science Literacy, Oxford University Press, 1993.
  16. S. M. Glynn, P. Brickman, N. Armstrong, and G. Taasoobshirazi, “Science motivation questionnaire II: validation with science majors and nonscience majors,” Journal of Research in Science Teaching, vol. 48, no. 10, pp. 1159–1176, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. Oxford University Press, Effort, 2015, http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/.
  18. H. L. Gibson and C. Chase, “Longitudinal impact of an inquiry-based science program on middle school students' attitudes toward science,” Science Education, vol. 86, no. 5, pp. 693–705, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. H.-L. Tuan, C.-C. Chin, C.-C. Tsai, and S.-F. Cheng, “Investigating the effectiveness of inquiry instruction on the motivation of different learning styles students,” International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 541–566, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. H. Ertepmar and O. Geban, “Effect of instruction supplied with the investigative-oriented laboratory approach on achievement in a science course,” Educational Research, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 333–341, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. M. Nieswandt, “Student affect and conceptual understanding in learning chemistry,” Journal of Research in Science Teaching, vol. 44, no. 7, pp. 908–937, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. S. Lau and R. W. Roeser, “Cognitive abilities and motivational processes in high school students' situational engagement and achievement in science,” Educational Assessment, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 139–162, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  23. S. W. Tyler, P. T. Hertel, M. C. McCallum, and H. C. Ellis, “Cognitive effort and memory,” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 607–617, 1979. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. D. M. Mertens, Research Methods in Education and Psychology. Integrating Diversity with Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches, Sage, Thousand Oaks, Calif, USA, 2010.
  25. J. P. Stevens, Applied Multivariate Statistics for the Social Sciences, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, USA, 1986.
  26. E. L. Deci and R. M. Ryan, “The general causality orientations scale: self-determination in personality,” Journal of Research in Personality, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 109–134, 1985. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. G. C. Williams and E. L. Deci, “Internalization of biopsychosocial values by medical students: a test of self-determination theory,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 70, no. 4, pp. 767–779, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. P. Zöfel, Statistik verstehen: ein Begleitbuch zur computergestützten Anwendung, Pearson Deutschland GmbH, Munich, Germany, 2002.
  29. J. P. Keeves, “Methods and processes in research in science,” in International Handbook of Science Education, Part Two, B. J. Fraser and K. G. Tobin, Eds., Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Netherlands, 1998. View at Google Scholar
  30. A. Field, Discovering Statistics Using SPSS Statistics, Sage, London, UK, 2005.
  31. S. Graham and S. Golan, “Motivational influences on cognition: task involvement, ego involvement, and depth of information processing,” Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 83, no. 2, pp. 187–194, 1991. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. P. C. Blumenfeld, E. Soloway, R. W. Marx, J. S. Krajcik, M. Guzdial, and A. Palincsar, “Motivating project-based learning: sustaining the doing, supporting the learning,” Educational Psychologist, vol. 26, no. 3-4, pp. 369–398, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  33. D. P. Shepardson and E. L. Pizzini, “Gender, achievement, and perception toward science activities,” School Science and Mathematics, vol. 94, no. 4, pp. 188–193, 1914. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  34. A. Wigfield, J. S. Eccles, and U. Schiefele, Development of Achievement Motivation, Academic Press, San Diego, Calif, USA, 2002.
  35. R. Geier, P. C. Blumenfeld, R. W. Marx et al., “Standardized test outcomes for students engaged in inquiry-based science curricula in the context of urban reform,” Journal of Research in Science Teaching, vol. 45, no. 8, pp. 922–939, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. M. Bong and E. M. Skaalvik, “Academic self-concept and self-efficacy: how different are they really?” Educational Psychology Review, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 1–40, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. R. D. Simpson and J. S. Oliver, “A summary of major influences on attitude toward and achievement in science among adolescent students,” Science Education, vol. 74, no. 1, pp. 1–18, 1990. View at Google Scholar
  38. H. Patrick, P. Mantzicopoulos, and A. Samarapungavan, “Motivation for learning science in kindergarten: is there a gender gap and does integrated inquiry and literacy instruction make a difference,” Journal of Research in Science Teaching, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 166–191, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. R. A. Beghetto, “Factors associated with middle and secondary students' perceived science competence,” Journal of Research in Science Teaching, vol. 44, no. 6, pp. 800–814, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. E. L. Deci, R. J. Vallerand, L. G. Pelletier, and R. M. Ryan, “Motivation and education: the self-determination perspective,” Educational Psychologist, vol. 26, no. 3-4, pp. 325–346, 1991. View at Google Scholar
  41. W. W. Welch, H. J. Walberg, and B. J. Fraser, “Predicting elementary science learning using national assessment data,” Journal of Research in Science Teaching, vol. 23, no. 8, pp. 699–706, 1986. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar