Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Education Research International
Volume 2016, Article ID 8506251, 10 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/8506251
Research Article

Digital Cadavers: Online 2D Learning Resources Enhance Student Learning in Practical Head and Neck Anatomy within Dental Programs

1School of Dentistry and Oral Health, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD 4222, Australia
2School of Medical Science, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD 4222, Australia

Received 19 April 2016; Accepted 26 May 2016

Academic Editor: Gwo-Jen Hwang

Copyright © 2016 Mahmoud M. Bakr et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. M. L. Barbeau, M. Johnson, C. Gibson, and K. A. Rogers, “The development and assessment of an online microscopic anatomy laboratory course,” Anatomical Sciences Education, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 246–256, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. R. M. Bernard, P. C. Abrami, Y. Lou et al., “How does distance education compare with classroom instruction? A meta-analysis of the empirical literature,” Review of Educational Research, vol. 74, no. 3, pp. 379–439, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. J. G. Ruiz, M. J. Mintzer, and R. M. Leipzig, “The impact of e-learning in medical education,” Academic Medicine, vol. 81, no. 3, pp. 207–212, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. H. Rosenberg, J. Kermalli, E. Freeman, H. Tenenbaum, D. Locker, and H. Cohen, “Effectiveness of an electronic histology tutorial for first-year dental students and improvement in ‘normalized’ test scores,” Journal of Dental Education, vol. 70, no. 12, pp. 1339–1345, 2006. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. J. A. McNulty, B. Sonntag, and J. M. Sinacore, “Evaluation of computer-aided instruction in a gross anatomy course: a six-year study,” Anatomical Sciences Education, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 2–8, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. B. S. Bryner, D. Saddawi-Konefka, and T. R. Gest, “The impact of interactive, computerized educational modules on preclinical medical education,” Anatomical Sciences Education, vol. 1, no. 6, pp. 247–251, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. A. M. Dantas and R. E. Kemm, “A blended approach to active learning in a physiology laboratory-based subject facilitated by an e-learning component,” American Journal of Physiology—Advances in Physiology Education, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 65–75, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. A. H. Mahnken, M. Baumann, M. Meister, V. Schmitt, and M. R. Fischer, “Blended learning in radiology: is self-determined learning really more effective?” European Journal of Radiology, vol. 78, no. 3, pp. 384–387, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. Y. H. Sung, I. G. Kwon, and E. Ryu, “Blended learning on medication administration for new nurses: integration of e-learning and face-to-face instruction in the classroom,” Nurse Education Today, vol. 28, no. 8, pp. 943–952, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. T. A. Stuckey-Mickell and B. D. Stuckey-Danner, “Virtual labs in the online biology course: student perceptions of effectiveness and usability,” MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 105–111, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  11. L. S. Hale, E. A. Mirakian, and D. B. Day, “Online vs. classroom instruction: student satisfaction and learning outcomes in an undergraduate allied health pharmacology course,” Journal of Allied Health, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. e36–e42, 2009. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. W. Strauss and N. Howe, Generations: The History of America's Future, 1584 to 2069, William Morrow and Company, New York, NY, USA, 1st edition, 1991.
  13. K. Mangold, “Educating a new generation: teaching baby boomer faculty about millennial students,” Nurse Educator, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 21–23, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. C. Dilullo, P. Mcgee, and R. M. Kriebel, “Demystifying the Millennial student: a reassessment in measures of character and engagement in professional education,” Anatomical Sciences Education, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 214–226, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. K. Sugand, P. Abrahams, and A. Khurana, “The anatomy of anatomy: a review for its modernization,” Anatomical Sciences Education, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 83–93, 2010. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. M. Hall, L.-A. Hanna, and G. Huey, “Use and views on social networking sites of pharmacy students in the United kingdom,” American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, vol. 77, no. 1, article 9, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. N. M. Foley, B. M. Maher, and M. A. Corrigan, “Social media and tomorrow's medical students—how do they fit?” Journal of Surgical Education, vol. 71, no. 3, pp. 385–390, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. D. M. Darda, “Observations by a university anatomy teacher and a suggestion for curricular change: integrative anatomy for undergraduates,” Anatomical Sciences Education, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 73–76, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. R. L. Drake, J. M. McBride, N. Lachman, and W. Pawlina, “Medical education in the anatomical sciences: the winds of change continue to blow,” Anatomical Sciences Education, vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 253–259, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. N. A. Granger, D. C. Calleson, O. W. Henson et al., “Use of web-based materials to enhance anatomy instruction in the health sciences,” The Anatomical Record Part B: The New Anatomist, vol. 289, no. 4, pp. 121–127, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. L. I. Rizzolo and W. B. Stewart, “Should we continue teaching anatomy by dissection when ...?” Anatomical Record B: New Anatomist, vol. 289, no. 6, pp. 215–218, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  22. P. J. O'Byrne, A. Patry, and J. A. Carnegie, “The development of interactive online learning tools for the study of anatomy,” Medical Teacher, vol. 30, no. 8, pp. e260–e271, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. K. Ahmed, S. Rowland, V. Patel et al., “Is the structure of anatomy curriculum adequate for safe medical practice?” Surgeon, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 318–324, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. K. J. A. H. Prince, A. J. A. A. Scherpbier, H. van Mameren, J. Drukker, and C. P. M. van der Vleuten, “Do students have sufficient knowledge of clinical anatomy?” Medical Education, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 326–332, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. Y. Gupta, M. Morgan, A. Singh, and H. Ellis, “Junior doctors' knowledge of applied clinical anatomy,” Clinical Anatomy, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 334–338, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. C. H. Bagley, E. Gillott, and A. Gunasekera, “Undergraduate anatomy teaching: are we failing a generation of future surgeons?” The Bulletin of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, vol. 93, no. 1, pp. S26–S28, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  27. E. R. Hall, R. C. Davis, R. Weller, S. Powney, and S. B. Williams, “Doing dissections differently: a structured, peer-assisted learning approach to maximizing learning in dissections,” Anatomical Sciences Education, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 56–66, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  28. S. K. Ghosh, “Evolution of illustrations in anatomy: a study from the classical period in Europe to modern times,” Anatomical Sciences Education, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 175–188, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. F. M. Corl, M. R. Garland, and E. K. Fishman, “Role of computer technology in medical illustration,” American Journal of Roentgenology, vol. 175, no. 6, pp. 1519–1524, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. R. B. Trelease, “Anatomical informatics: millennial perspectives on a newer frontier,” Anatomical Record, vol. 269, no. 5, pp. 224–235, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. R. B. Trelease and A. Rosset, “Transforming clinical imaging data for virtual reality learning objects,” Anatomical Sciences Education, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 50–55, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. S. M. Attardi and K. A. Rogers, “Design and implementation of an online systemic human anatomy course with laboratory,” Anatomical Sciences Education, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 53–62, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. S. E. Van Nuland and K. A. Rogers, “The anatomy of E-learning tools: does software usability influence learning outcomes?” Anatomical Sciences Education, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  34. M. M. Bakr, W. L. Massey, and H. Alexander, “Evaluation of Simodont haptic 3D virtual reality dental training simulator,” International Journal of Dental Clinics, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 1–6, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  35. M. M. Bakr, W. L. Massey, and H. Alexander, “Students' evaluation of a 3DVR haptic device (Simodont®). Does early exposure to haptic feedback during preclinical dental education enhance the development of psychomotor skills?” International Journal of Dental Clinics, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 1–7, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  36. A. Stirling and J. Birt, “An enriched multimedia eBook application to facilitate learning of anatomy,” Anatomical Sciences Education, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 19–27, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. I. P. Johnson, E. Palmer, J. Burton, and M. Brockhouse, “Online learning resources in anatomy: what do students think?” Clinical Anatomy, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 556–563, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. M. Shachar and Y. Neumann, “Twenty years of research on the academic performance differences between traditional and distance learning: summative meta-analysis and trend examination,” MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 318–334, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  39. I. Rolfe and J. McPherson, “Formative assessment: how am I doing?” The Lancet, vol. 345, no. 8953, pp. 837–839, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. P. Black and D. Wiliam, “Assessment and classroom learning,” Assessment in Education, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 7–74, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  41. S. B. Bierer, E. F. Dannefer, C. Taylor, P. Hall, and A. L. Hull, “Methods to assess students' acquisition, application and integration of basic science knowledge in an innovative competency-based curriculum,” Medical Teacher, vol. 30, no. 7, pp. e171–e177, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. M. T. Carrillo-de-la-Peña, E. Baillès, X. Caseras, À. Martínez, G. Ortet, and J. Pérez, “Formative assessment and academic achievement in pre-graduate students of health sciences,” Advances in Health Sciences Education: Theory and Practice, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 61–67, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. D. J. R. Evans, P. Zeun, and R. A. Stanier, “Motivating student learning using a formative assessment journey,” Journal of Anatomy, vol. 224, no. 3, pp. 296–303, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. A. L. O. Webb and S. Choi, “Interactive radiological anatomy eLearning solution for first year medical students: development, integration, and impact on learning,” Anatomical Sciences Education, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 350–360, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. E. G. Beale, P. M. Tarwater, and V. H. Lee, “A retrospective look at replacing face-to-face embryology instruction with online lectures in a human anatomy course,” Anatomical Sciences Education, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 234–241, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. J. A. Carnegie, “The use of limericks to engage student interest and promote active learning in an undergraduate course in functional anatomy,” Anatomical Sciences Education, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 90–97, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. D. S. Shin, D. H. Kim, J. S. Park, H. G. Jang, and M. S. Chung, “Evaluation of anatomy comic strips for further production and applications,” Anatomy and Cell Biology, vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 210–216, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  48. W. C. McGaghie, S. B. Issenberg, E. R. Petrusa, and R. J. Scalese, “Effect of practice on standardised learning outcomes in simulation-based medical education,” Medical Education, vol. 40, no. 8, pp. 792–797, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. A. J. Azzi, C. J. Ramnanan, J. Smith, É. Dionne, and A. Jalali, “To quiz or not to quiz: formative tests help detect students at risk of failing the clinical anatomy course,” Anatomical Sciences Education, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 413–420, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. I. M. Inuwa, V. Taranikanti, M. Al-Rawahy, and O. Habbal, “Anatomy practical examinations: how does student performance on computerized evaluation compare with the traditional format?” Anatomical Sciences Education, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 27–32, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. M. Prensky, Digital Game-Based Learning, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, USA, 2nd edition, 2004.
  52. W. B. Kennedy, P. R. Kelley, and M. Saffran, “Use of NBME examinations to assess retention of basic science knowledge,” Journal of Medical Education, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 167–173, 1981. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. G. Norman, “The essential role of basic science in medical education: the perspective from psychology,” Clinical and Investigative Medicine, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 47–51, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. Y. Ling, D. B. Swanson, K. Holtzman, and S. D. Bucak, “Retention of basic science information by senior medical students,” Academic Medicine, vol. 83, no. 10, supplement, pp. S82–S85, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. E. J. F. M. Custers and O. T. J. ten Cate, “Very long-term retention of basic science knowledge in doctors after graduation,” Medical Education, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 422–430, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  56. M. D. Lazarus, V. M. Chinchilli, S. L. Leong, and G. L. Kauffman Jr., “Perceptions of anatomy: critical components in the clinical setting,” Anatomical Sciences Education, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 187–199, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  57. H. Jenkins, “From youtube to you niversity,” The Chronicle of Higher Education, vol. 53, no. 24, pp. B9–B10, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  58. A. A. Jaffar, “YouTube: an emerging tool in anatomy education,” Anatomical Sciences Education, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 158–164, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  59. A. A. Jaffar, “Exploring the use of a facebook page in anatomy education,” Anatomical Sciences Education, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 199–208, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  60. H. Schmidt, “Integrating the teaching of basic sciences, clinical sciences, and biopsychosocial issues,” Academic Medicine, vol. 73, no. 9, pp. S24–S31, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  61. J. H. Muller, S. Jain, H. Loeser, and D. M. Irby, “Lessons learned about integrating a medical school curriculum: perceptions of students, faculty and curriculum leaders,” Medical Education, vol. 42, no. 8, pp. 778–785, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  62. M. Cook, D. M. Irby, and B. C. O'Brien, Educating Physicians: A Call for Reform of Medical School and Residency, JosseyBass, San Franscisco, Calif, USA, 1st edition, 2010.
  63. M. M. Cuddy, D. B. Swanson, R. L. Drake, and W. Pawlina, “Changes in anatomy instruction and USMLE performance: empirical evidence on the absence of a relationship,” Anatomical Sciences Education, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 3–10, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  64. R. A. Green and D. L. Hughes, “Student outcomes associated with use of asynchronous online discussion forums in gross anatomy teaching,” Anatomical Sciences Education, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 101–106, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  65. O. P. Gobée, D. Jansma, and M. C. Deruiter, “AnatomicalTerms.info: heading for an online solution to the anatomical synonym problem hurdles in data-reuse from the Terminologia Anatomica and the foundational model of anatomy and potentials for future development,” Clinical Anatomy, vol. 24, no. 7, pp. 817–830, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus