Gastroenterology Research and Practice

Gastroenterology Research and Practice / 2013 / Article

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2013 |Article ID 256145 | 7 pages |

Nutrition Care for Patients with Weight Regain after Bariatric Surgery

Academic Editor: Christopher J. de Gara
Received29 Jul 2013
Accepted02 Oct 2013
Published19 Nov 2013


Achieving optimal weight outcomes for patients with obesity is important to the management of their chronic disease. All interventions present risks for weight regain. Bariatric surgery is the most efficacious treatment, producing greater weight losses that are sustained over more time compared to lifestyle interventions. However, approximately 20–30% of patients do not achieve successful weight outcomes, and patients may experience a regain of 20–25% of their lost weight. This paper reviews several factors that influence weight regain after bariatric surgery, including type of surgery, food tolerance, energy requirements, drivers to eat, errors in estimating intake, adherence, food and beverage choices, and patient knowledge. A comprehensive multidisciplinary approach can provide the best care for patients with weight regain. Nutrition care by a registered dietitian is recommended for all bariatric surgery patients. Nutrition diagnoses and interventions are discussed. Regular monitoring of weight status and early intervention may help prevent significant weight regain.

1. Introduction

Obesity is a chronic disease that presents significant challenges for treatment long term. For lifestyle interventions, only 20% of people attempting weight loss are able to achieve and maintain 5% weight loss over a year [1]. Factors that predict weight regain after weight loss include a loss of >15–30% of initial weight, early weight regain, and not responding to early regain [2]. Interventions and strategies for weight regain that have been found effective in the nonsurgical literature include self monitoring, continued patient-provider contact, and increased physical activity [3].

In order to determine weight regain, it is important to understand the definition of weight stability. A stable weight is not just one number on the scale; it is normal to see some small fluctuations in weight. Weight stability has been defined as ±5 kg for both surgical and nonsurgical patients [4, 5]. Weight regain could then be identified when the weight has increased beyond the weight stable range.

Weight outcomes are better with surgical interventions. “Success” in terms of weight outcomes in the surgical literature has been described as 50–75% excess weight loss (% EWL), 20–30% loss of initial weight, and achieving a BMI less than 35 kg/m2 [612]. Weight regain is a risk for all patients after bariatric surgery. Approximately 20–30% of patients with bariatric surgery do not achieve successful weight outcomes [7, 8]. Regain of 20–25% of the lost weight after bariatric surgery can occur over a period of 10 years [8]. “Failure” in terms of weight outcomes can then be described as <50% EWL, <20% loss of initial weight, and a BMI ≥ 35 kg/m2. It is challenging to accurately determine the incidences of weight regain in the postbariatric surgery population due to the loss of patients to follow up over the long term and differences in reporting weight trends.

There are several factors that influence weight outcomes, including weight regain after bariatric surgery. The purpose of this paper is to review some of the key factors and their nutrition implications.

1.1. Type of Surgery

Weight outcomes differ by surgical procedure. In one meta-analysis they found that the sleeve gastrectomy (SG), compared to the laparoscopic adjustable gastric band (LAGB), achieved higher % EWL and greater improvement with diabetes [13].

Compared to malabsorptive procedures, restrictive procedures tend to have higher rates of weight loss failure and weight regain [12, 1416]. In the study by Romy et al. [9], surgical failure was defined as EWL < 25% or BMI > 35 kg/m2 or a need for reversal/conversion procedure. The outcomes from this study indicated that LAGB had a higher failure rate compared to roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) (see Table 1). Both maximum weight lost and rate of weight loss were better with RYGB.

EWL < 25% or need for reversal/conversion procedure BMI > 35 kg/m2 or need for reversal/conversion procedure

Three years18.2%0%31.7%6.9%
Six years38.9%2.5%48.3%12.3%

1.2. Food Tolerance

There is a lower food tolerance in bariatric surgery patients compared to nonsurgical obese patients [17]. Food tolerance results from a quality of eating questionnaire indicated that all bariatric surgery patients, regardless of procedure, reported problems with food tolerance in the short term (3–6 months), indicating the need for nutrition monitoring and evaluation. For RYGB patients, food tolerance is reduced after 3 months but then becomes comparable to non-surgical obese population at one year. However, for LAGB patients at 6 months they had a lower food tolerance compared to all other procedures, and this tolerance worsened over 5 years [17, 18]. In another study it was found that on top of more food intolerances, LAGB patients also have more frequent vomiting [9]. Since LAGB patients have more food tolerance issues that persist overtime (>12 months), they may require more monitoring [18].

It is possible to regain weight even with food intolerances, as energy intake can exceed needs. Foods that improve satiety (protein and fibre) and have lower caloric density (raw fruits and vegetables) may not be well tolerated after bariatric surgery. For example, a patient may not tolerate a whole raw apple (1 medium = 72 calories) but may tolerate apple juice (1 cup 250 mL = 118 calories) easier [19]. By switching from a solid texture to a liquid texture, a larger portion can be consumed which may increase caloric intake and contribute to weight gain over time.

Signs and symptoms that a patient is experiencing low food tolerance may include food selection that is limited to liquid or pureed texture, limited food variety, vomiting after intake of solid foods, swallowing difficulty (feeling of food “getting stuck”), consumption of liquids with solids, nausea, abdominal pain and cramping, and heartburn/reflux.

Depending upon the amount of tolerance and food selection, nutritional status can be compromised. There is a risk of protein malnutrition due to low food tolerance related to the texture of some high protein foods, such as red meat or well cooked/dry meats or poultry. Low intake of fruits and vegetables can contribute to low fibre intake and vitamin/mineral intake. A registered dietitian can assess nutritional status and help with management of food tolerances.

1.3. Energy Requirements

Nutrition prescription is an important component of nutrition intervention of weight management. It can be quite challenging to determine energy (calorie) requirements. Predictive equations are commonly used; however, the accuracy can vary and do not account for body composition which can impact energy requirements [20, 21]. There are reductions in energy requirements during and shortly after weight loss [4]. With the significant changes of both fat mass and fat free mass after bariatric surgery, it puts into question how much reduction in energy requirements occur with weight loss.

Adaptive thermogenesis is a decrease in energy expenditure (EE) after weight loss beyond what can be predicted from changes in fat mass and fat free mass [22]. In a study with nonsurgical, obese subjects, those with larger weight loss showed a greater reduction in measured resting metabolic rate (RMR) compared to predicted values [23]. Several studies have assessed metabolic rate in bariatric surgery patients, and they have found a decrease in RMR after surgery [23]. In patients with vertical banded gastroplasty, a reduction in sleeping metabolic rate persisted after adjustment for body composition, at both 12 months and 98 months as long as weight loss was maintained [24]. In RYGB patients who experience weight regain, it has been seen that their RMR is lower than the weight stable group and that predictive formulas overestimate their RMR [25]. Reduction in energy requirement is sustained as long as weight loss is maintained in both surgical and nonsurgical patients; for those who regain weight to or above their starting weight, adaptive thermogenesis is no longer observed [4, 24].

An important component of total daily energy requirements is energy expenditure. Physical activity is important for both weight and other health related outcomes; however, most Canadians do not meet the recommended levels of activity, regardless of BMI. In one particular study, only 1/3 of the surgical group reported engaging in a level of physical activity consistent with recommendations for prevention of weight regain, compared with 60% of the non-surgical group [5]. Regular activity after surgery is related to better % EWL, maintenance of loss and fat-free mass [25, 26]. The increase in total amount of activity from presurgery to postsurgery has been found to be more important than the intensity [26]. Overall, more physical activity is associated with better postoperative weight loss maintenance [27, 28].

A sustained adaptive thermogenesis favors positive energy balance and may predispose to weight regain [4]. Measurement of resting energy requirements would improve accuracy of nutrition prescriptions, and optimization of energy expenditure may be helpful to achieve energy balance to help prevent further weight regain

1.4. Drivers to Eat

There are multiple drivers that effect hunger, appetite, satiety, and reward; these drivers influence our eating behaviours. Susceptibility to cues that trigger overeating can increase weight regain regardless of initial weight loss method (surgical versus nonsurgical) [5].

Chapman et al. [29] identified television watching, alcohol intake, and sleep deprivation as drivers to eat in healthy individuals. Each behaviour was linked to disinhibition resulting in less restrictive food consumption and weight gain. When all 3 behaviors were present, the effect was stronger. Consistent and long term exposure to these drivers develops a conditioned effect and decreases ones capacity or tendency to exhibit inhibitory control. Higher levels of disinhibition and increases in disinhibition over 1 year are significant predictors of weight regain in both surgical and nonsurgical participants. At both National Weight Control Registry entry and 1-year followup, surgical participants reported lower dietary restraint than non-surgical participants [5].

In one study RYGB patients (>18 months post op) with weight regain reported a return of problematic presurgical eating behaviours, such as increased hunger, difficulty coping with the return of food cravings, and grazing on energy dense foods [30]. Odom et al. [31] identified independent predictors of significant weight regain after gastric bypass; these predictors were increased food urges, decreased well being, and concerns of alcohol or drug use.

Changes in energy intake may be also affected by alterations in gut and adipocyte hormones, including ghrelin, PYY, GLP-1, and leptin [3235].

1.5. Errors in Estimating Intake

Self monitoring of intake is a key health behaviour to help support patients with self management. Dietitians use this information collected by the patients as part of their assessment. Self reported intake, on average, will underestimate actual intake by 20 to 50%. Underreporting impacts estimates of calories, macronutrients and micronutrients. Some studies have shown a greater underreporting for calories than protein [36, 37]. Problems with accuracy of self reported intake have been documented across all BMI categories, genders, and age groups [3840]. In a study with 1551 adults, underreporting occurred in 75–88% of the adults [41]. In the NHANES 11 study ( ), 31% of adults underreported dietary intake [42].

In the group of non-surgical, obese patients, although estimations of portion sizes were accurate, they recalled eating 20% less than they actually ate, resulting in underreporting of 40% of their calories. Higher degree of underreporting occurred with patients who reported less hunger and disinhibition [43]. Females, people with a higher BMI (>30 kg/m2), those with a high need for social desirability, and people with dietary restraint, tend to have higher rates of underreporting [40, 42, 4447].

Influences on under-reporting of intake include both intentional and unintentional factors. Intentional underreporting may include not reporting foods usually consumed but avoided at the time of recording, not reporting foods consumed that are not consistent with their diet plan, or not reporting foods that the patient considers “hostile” or “bad” (i.e., sweets). Unintentional factors may include a lack of recording foods due to infrequency of intake or having a genuine lack of recall (i.e., forgetting snacks, beverages) [36, 48].

It is important to discuss with patient the inherent errors with self reported intake. Patients express great frustration when they review their food records and the calories are within target but the expected weight change does not occur. Calculations of the reported intake need to be discussed in context of these errors. To improve accuracy, dietitians can work with patients to find self monitoring tools that best suits their needs, improve estimation of portions, teach patients how to accurately measure food portions, and help patients access accurate sources for nutrition information.

1.6. Adherence

Adherence to recommendations is important for any intervention to be successful. The frequency of followup will depend on the type of procedure and comorbid conditions. Nutrition care by a registered dietitian is recommended for all bariatric surgery patients.

Adherence with follow-up visits after bariatric surgery improves weight outcomes. In particular to the LAGB, frequent followup for nutrition and band adjustments are important; missing <25% of appointments was associated with greater loss of excess body weight [10, 49, 50]. Dixon et al. [51] found that a follow-up frequency less of than 13 times in 2 years especially males was associated with less weight loss, and Weichman et al. [52] found that less than 7 follow-up visits per year was associated with less loss of excess body weight (both studies looked at LAGB patients). Frequency of post-surgery visits is also inversely related to weight regain after gastric bypass [31].

Although followup is recommended, adherence to post-surgery visits is low. In one study, 782 RYGB patients were followed over 5 years. At 4 years, data was available for 60% of these patients of which 64% experienced weight regain. Of those patients that experienced weight regain, 60% never had nutritional follow up and 80% never underwent psychological followup [53].

Adherence with self monitoring behaviours decreases likelihood of weight regain [31]. In the study by Stewart et al. [30], RYGB patients with weight regain were able to identify a number of behaviour change strategies that worked initially after surgery, but overtime relaxed their use of these strategies, including self monitoring (i.e., journaling, measuring weight) and attending follow-up appointments.

Bariatric surgery can present many challenges impacting a patient’s nutrition-related behaviours and oral intake. It can be difficult to comprehend and adhere to all recommendations and optimize nutritional status. Over time, there is a trend for increase in energy intake: 1500, 1700, 1800, 1900, and 2000 kcal/day, at 6 months and 1, 2, 3, and 4–10 years after surgery [4]. Adherence to nutrition appointments and recommendations improves outcomes. Nutrition counseling was effective in reducing the total body weight and body fat of RYGB patients (2 years post-op) with weight regain as per a study done by Faria et al. [56]. Del Corral et al. [57] investigated weight regain in non-surgical obese patients and found that higher adherence to a low energy diet predicted lower weight regain over 2 years; the high adherence group regained 50% of their weight loss compared with 99% in the low adherence group.

1.7. Food and Beverage Choices

Although bariatric surgery provides restriction to help limit food portions, energy intake can be high if foods with high caloric density are consumed. Caloric dense foods such as ice cream, nuts and nut butters, oils, high-fat condiments (mayonnaise, gravy), chocolate, and alcohol can contribute to excess calories even when consumed in smaller portions.

Consumption of caloric beverages contributes to total energy intake. Some patients have low awareness of caloric content of beverages or may not record caloric beverages as part of daily intake. The calories consumed in beverages do not provide the same satiety/fullness cues as solid food; therefore, compensation at the next meal does not occur [58]. In one study, replacement of caloric beverages with water or calorie-free beverages resulted in a weight loss of 2–2.5% in obese subjects [59].

In general, patients are recommended to eat 3 small meals plus 1 or two snacks each day. Some patients eat frequently or present with grazing pattern, which can contribute to exceeding caloric requirements. A greater percentage of surgical participants (compared to nonsurgical) reported night eating at least one time per week at both National Weight Control Registry entry and 1 year followup, and this may contribute to weight regain [5].

1.8. Patient Knowledge

Knowledge base of patients around bariatric surgery is quite variable. Multiple sources of information (i.e., health care provider, friend/family, colleague, media, and internet) vary in accuracy and applicability to that individual. Patients may not be aware that weight regain can occur. Their expectations for weight outcomes may be high and not consistent with outcomes in the published literature.

Use an open and inquisitive approach. It is important to not assume a patient is “noncompliant” with recommendations as they may have not received appropriate and current evidenced-based information. Patients presenting with weight regain likely had their surgery a few years ago, and it is important to assess and update them with current evidence-based information.

2. Nutrition Care

Assessment by a registered dietitian is recommended for all bariatric surgery patients [10, 60]. A comprehensive nutrition assessment should include a detailed food and nutrition-related history, measurements of height and weight, a detailed weight history (see Box 1), review of biochemical data, and a review of medical tests and procedures. Assessment of energy intake and adequacy of both macronutrient and micronutrient intake will determine the nutrition status of the patient. Energy requirements can be estimated with a predictive equation (i.e., Mifflin St. Jeor); however, a measured RMR is recommended.

Nutrition diagnoses that could be appropriate for patients presenting with weight regain after bariatric surgery include Excessive Energy Intake (NI-1.3), Limited Food Acceptance (NI-2.9), Unintended Weight Gain (NC-3.4), Food-and-Nutrition Related Knowledge Deficit (NB-1.1), Self Monitoring Deficit (NB-1.4), and Undesirable Food Choices (NB-1.7) [61].

The nutrition recommendations after bariatric surgery are discussed within the published literature [3, 10, 54]. A summary of key points is provided in Box 2. A nutrition prescription includes total energy recommended to achieve weight loss and prevention of further weight gain, as indicated. Nutrition education is important to address any knowledge deficits and to provide strategies to achieve goals of care. Self monitoring of intake, activity, and weight is recommended. Records can include not just the foods consumed but also time and location of eating, and any triggers for eating (i.e., emotions or feelings). Counseling and support can help build self monitoring skills and strategies to overcome barriers and improve accuracy.

2.1. Coordination of Care

A comprehensive team approach can provide the best care for patients with chronic diseases, including patient with obesity and postbariatric surgery. Interventions for weight regain should include a multidisciplinary approach, including nutrition, physical activity, behavioural modification with frequent followup. Coordinate care with a physician to assess for medical reasons for weight gain (i.e., thyroid, medication). Mental health assessment and support may be indicated for significant problematic eating behaviours. Coordinate care with a surgeon to assess for mechanical or surgery-related complications (i.e., band slippage, LAGB fill volume, and stomal dilation) or a need for surgical revision [3, 10].

3. Conclusion

Weight regain after bariatric surgery demonstrates the chronic and progressive nature of obesity. It is a complex disease requiring expertise from many health care providers. Monitoring of weight by both patient and health care providers can identify when weight regain occurs. Weight gain of more than 5 kg can be used as indicator for early assessment and intervention. Early intervention for weight regain may help prevent excessive regain and obesity-related health concerns. Registered dietitians have an important role to optimize care for patients with weight regain by improving self management skills, prevention/treatment of nutritional deficiencies, and optimizing nutritional status [10, 54].

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there are no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.


  1. M. T. McGuire, R. R. Wing, M. L. Klem, W. Lang, and J. O. Hill, “What predicts weight regain in a group of successful weight losers?” Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, vol. 67, no. 2, pp. 177–185, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. C. G. Ulen, M. M. Huizinga, B. Beech, and T. A. Elasy, “Weight regain prevention,” Clinical Diabetes, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 100–113, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. D. B. Sarwer, R. J. Dilks, and L. West-Smith, “Dietary intake and eating behavior after bariatric surgery: threats to weight loss maintenance and strategies for success,” Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 644–651, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. S. G. Camps, S. P. Verhoef, and K. R. Westerterp, “Weight loss, weight maintenance, and adaptive thermogenesis,” American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 97, no. 5, pp. 990–994, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. D. S. Bond, S. Phelan, T. M. Leahey, J. O. Hill, and R. R. Wing, “Weight-loss maintenance in successful weight losers: surgical versus non-surgical methods,” International Journal of Obesity, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 173–180, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. L. Sjöström, A. K. Lindroos, M. Peltonen et al., “Lifestyle, diabetes, and cardiovascular risk factors 10 years after bariatric surgery,” New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 351, no. 26, pp. 2683–2693, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. L. Sjöström, K. Napbro, D. Sjöström et al., “Effects of bariatric surgery on mortality in Swedish obesity subjects,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 357, no. 8, pp. 753–761, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  8. D. Heber, F. L. Greenway, L. M. Kaplan, E. Livingston, J. Salvador, and C. Still, “Endocrine and nutritional management of the post-bariatric surgery patient: an endocrine society clinical practice guideline,” Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 95, no. 11, pp. 4823–4843, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. S. Romy, A. Donadini, V. Giusti, and M. Suter, “Roux-en-Y gastric bypass versus gastric banding for morbid obesity,” Archives of Surgery, vol. 147, no. 5, pp. 460–466, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. J. I. Mechanick, R. F. Kushner, H. J. Sugerman et al., “AACE/TOS/ASMBS guidelines: American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, the Obesity Society, and American Society for Metabolic & Bariatric Surgery Medical guidelines for clinical practice for the perioperative nutritional, metabolic, and nonsurgical support of the bariatric surgery patient,” Obesity, vol. 17, supplement 1, pp. S1–S70, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. N. V. Christou, M. Lieberman, F. Sampalis, and J. S. Sampalis, “Bariatric surgery reduces cancer risk in morbidly obese patients,” Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases, vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 691–695, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. M. A. Maggard, L. R. Shugarman, M. Suttorp et al., “Meta-analysis: Surgical treatment of obesity,” Annals of Internal Medicine, vol. 142, no. 6, pp. 547–559, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  13. S. Wang, L. Ping, X. F. Sun, N. Y. Ye, Z. K. Xu, and D. Wang, “Comparison between laproscopic sleeve gastrectomy and laproscopic adjustable gastric banding for morbid obesity: a meta-analysis,” Obesity Surgery, vol. 23, no. 7, pp. 980–986, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. W. W. Te Riele, J. M. Vogten, D. Boerma, M. J. Wiezer, and B. Van Ramshorst, “Comparison of weight loss and morbidity after gastric bypass and gastric banding. A single center european experience,” Obesity Surgery, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 11–16, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. V. N. Prachand, R. T. DaVee, and J. C. Alverdy, “Duodenal switch provides superior weight loss in the super-obese (BMI ≥ 50 kg/m2) compared with gastric bypass,” Annals of Surgery, vol. 244, no. 4, pp. 611–617, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. J. A. Tice, L. Karliner, J. Walsh, A. J. Petersen, and M. D. Feldman, “Gastric banding or bypass? A systematic review comparing the two most popular bariatric procedures,” American Journal of Medicine, vol. 121, no. 10, pp. 885–893, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. M. Suter, J. M. Calmes, A. Paroz, and V. Giusti, “A new questionnaire for quick assessment of food tolerance after bariatric surgery,” Obesity Surgery, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 2–8, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. C. Schweiger, R. Weiss, and A. Keidar, “Effect of different bariatric operations on food tolerance and quality of eating,” Obesity Surgery, vol. 20, no. 10, pp. 1393–1399, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. Health Canada, “Nutrient value of some common foods,” 2008, View at: Google Scholar
  20. D. Frankenfield, L. Roth-Yousey, and C. Compher, “Comparison of predictive equations for resting metabolic rate in healthy nonobese and obese adults: a systematic review,” Journal of the American Dietetic Association, vol. 105, no. 5, pp. 775–789, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. F. Oliveria, R. Moreira, C. Zuconi, A. Ribeiro, and J. Bressan, “Agreement between different methods and predictive equations for resting energy expenditure in overweight and obese Brazilian men,” Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, vol. 112, pp. 1415–1420, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. G. C. Major, E. Doucet, P. Trayhurn, A. Astrup, and A. Tremblay, “Clinical significance of adaptive thermogenesis,” International Journal of Obesity, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 204–212, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. M. Shah, V. Simha, and A. Garg, “Review: long-term impact of bariatric surgery on body weight, comorbidities, and nutritional status,” Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 91, no. 11, pp. 4223–4231, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. W. G. Van Gemert, K. R. Westerterp, J. W. M. Greve, and P. B. Soeters, “Reduction of sleeping metabolic rate after vertical banded gastroplasty,” International Journal of Obesity, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 343–348, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  25. S. L. Faria, E. Kelly, and O. P. Faria, “Energy expenditure and weight regain in patients submitted to roux-en-Y gastric bypass,” Obesity Surgery, vol. 19, no. 7, pp. 856–859, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. D. S. Bond, S. Phelan, L. G. Wolfe et al., “Becoming physically active after bariatric surgery is associated with improved weight loss and health-related quality of life,” Obesity, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 78–83, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. K. Egberts, W. A. Brown, L. Brennan, and P. E. O'Brien, “Does exercise improve weight loss after bariatric surgery? A systematic review,” Obesity Surgery, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 335–341, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. H. J. Silver, A. Torquati, G. L. Jensen, and W. O. Richards, “Weight, dietary and physical activity behaviors two years after gastric bypass,” Obesity Surgery, vol. 16, no. 7, pp. 859–864, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. C. Chapman, C. Benedict, S. Brooks, and H. Schioth, “Lifestyle determinants of the drive to eat: a meta-analysis,” American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 96, no. 3, pp. 492–497, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. K. E. Stewart, M. E. Olbrisch, and M. K. Bean, “Back on track: confronting post-surgical weight gain,” Bariatric Nursing and Surgical Patient Care, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 179–185, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. J. Odom, K. C. Zalesin, T. L. Washington et al., “Behavioral predictors of weight regain after bariatric surgery,” Obesity Surgery, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 349–356, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. M. M. Meguid, M. J. Glade, and F. A. Middleton, “Weight regain after Roux-en-Y: a significant 20% complication related to PYY,” Nutrition, vol. 24, no. 9, pp. 832–842, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. K. Michalakis and C. le Roux, “Gut hormones and leptin: impact on energy control and changes after bariatric surgery—what the future holds,” Obesity Surgery, vol. 22, pp. 1648–1657, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. M. Rosenbaum, R. Goldsmith, D. Bloomfield et al., “Low-dose leptin reverses skeletal muscle, autonomic, and neuroendocrine adaptations to maintenance of reduced weight,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 115, no. 12, pp. 3579–3586, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. H. R. Kissileff, J. C. Thornton, M. I. Torres et al., “Leptin reverses declines in satiation in weight-reduced obese humans,” American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 95, no. 2, pp. 309–317, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. B. L. Heitmann and L. Lissner, “Dietary underreporting by obese individuals—is it specific or non-specific?” British Medical Journal, vol. 311, no. 7011, pp. 986–989, 1995. View at: Google Scholar
  37. A. E. Black, S. A. Bingham, G. Johansson, and W. A. Coward, “Validation of dietary intakes of protein and energy against 24 hour urinary N and DLW energy expenditure in middle-aged women, retired men and post-obese subjects: comparisons with validation against presumed energy requirements,” European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 51, no. 6, pp. 405–413, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  38. D. A. Schoeller, “How accurate is self-reported dietary energy intake?” Nutrition Reviews, vol. 48, no. 10, pp. 373–379, 1990. View at: Google Scholar
  39. D. A. Schoeller, “Limitations in the assessment of dietary energy intake by self-report,” Metabolism: Clinical and Experimental, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 18–22, 1995. View at: Google Scholar
  40. D. A. Schoeller, L. G. Bandini, and W. H. Dietz, “Inaccuracies in self-reported intake identified by comparison with the doubly labelled water method,” Canadian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology, vol. 68, no. 7, pp. 941–949, 1990. View at: Google Scholar
  41. K. L. Rennie, A. Coward, and S. A. Jebb, “Estimating under-reporting of energy intake in dietary surveys using an individualised method,” British Journal of Nutrition, vol. 97, no. 6, pp. 1169–1176, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. R. C. Klesges, L. H. Eck, and J. W. Ray, “Who underreports dietary intake in a dietary recall? Evidence from the Second National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey,” Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, vol. 63, no. 3, pp. 438–444, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. S. W. Lichtman, K. Pisarska, E. R. Berman et al., “Discrepancy between self-reported and actual caloric intake and exercise in obese subjects,” New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 327, no. 27, pp. 1893–1898, 1992. View at: Google Scholar
  44. A. H. C. Goris, M. S. Westerterp-Plantenga, and K. R. Westerterp, “Undereating and underrecording of habitual food intake in obese men: selective underreporting of fat intake,” American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 71, no. 1, pp. 130–134, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  45. M. A. Mendez, B. M. Popkin, G. Buckland et al., “Alternative methods of accounting for underreporting and overreporting when measuring dietary intake-obesity relations,” American Journal of Epidemiology, vol. 173, no. 4, pp. 448–458, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. M. J. Kretsch, A. K. H. Fong, and M. W. Green, “Behavioral and body size correlates of energy intake underreporting by obese and normal-weight women,” Journal of the American Dietetic Association, vol. 99, no. 3, pp. 300–306, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. J. D. Ard, R. A. Desmond, D. B. Allison, and J. M. Conway, “Dietary restraint and disinhibition do not affect accuracy of 24-hour recall in a multiethnic population,” Journal of the American Dietetic Association, vol. 106, no. 3, pp. 434–437, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. J. Macdiarmid and J. Blundell, “Assessing dietary intake: who, what and why of under-reporting,” Nutrition Research Reviews, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 231–253, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  49. M. El Chaar, K. McDeavitt, S. Richardson, K. S. Gersin, T. S. Kuwada, and D. Stefanidis, “Does patient compliance with preoperative bariatric office visits affect postoperative excess weight loss?” Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 743–748, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. R. Shen, G. Dugay, K. Rajaram, I. Cabrera, N. Siegel, and C. J. Ren, “Impact of patient follow-up on weight loss after bariatric surgery,” Obesity Surgery, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 514–519, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. J. B. Dixon, C. P. Laurie, M. L. Anderson, M. J. Hayden, M. E. Dixon, and P. E. O'Brien, “Motivation, readiness to change, and weight loss following adjustable gastric band surgery,” Obesity, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 698–705, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. K. Weichman, C. Ren, M. Kurian et al., “The effectiveness of adjustable gastric banding: a retrospective 6-year U.S. follow-up study,” Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 397–403, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. D. O. Magro, B. Geloneze, R. Delfini, B. C. Pareja, F. Callejas, and J. C. Pareja, “Long-term weight regain after gastric bypass: a 5-year prospective study,” Obesity Surgery, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 648–651, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  54. L. Aills, J. Blankenship, C. Buffington, M. Furtado, and J. Parrott, “ASMBS Allied Health Nutritional Guidelines for the Surgical Weight Loss Patient,” Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases, vol. 4, no. 5, pp. S73–S108, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  55. American Dietetic Association, ADA Pocket Guide to Bariatric Surgery, American Dietetic Association, Chicago, Ill, USA, 2009.
  56. S. L. Faria, E. De Oliveira Kelly, R. D. Lins, and O. P. Faria, “Nutritional management of weight regain after bariatric surgery,” Obesity Surgery, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 135–139, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  57. P. Del Corral, D. R. Bryan, W. T. Garvey, B. A. Gower, and G. R. Hunter, “Dietary adherence during weight loss predicts weight regain,” Obesity, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 1177–1181, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  58. A. Kant, B. Graubard, and R. Mattes, “Association of food form with self-reported 24-h energy intake and meal patterns in US adults: NHANES 2003–2008,” American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 96, pp. 1369–1378, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  59. D. F. Tate, G. Turner-McGrievy, E. Lyons et al., “Replacing caloric beverages with water or diet beverages for weight loss in adults: main results of the Choose Healthy Options Consciously Everyday (CHOICE) randomized clinical trial,” American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 95, no. 3, pp. 555–563, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  60. D. Kulick, L. Hark, and D. Deen, “The bariatric surgery patient: a growing role for registered dietitians,” Journal of the American Dietetic Association, vol. 110, no. 4, pp. 593–599, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  61. Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, Pocket Guide for International Dietetics and Nutrition Terminology (IDNT) Reference Manual: Standardized Language for the Nutrition Care Process, Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, Chicago, Ill, USA, 2013.

Copyright © 2013 Carlene Johnson Stoklossa and Suneet Atwal. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

8850 Views | 2064 Downloads | 26 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder
 Sign up for content alertsSign up