Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Magnetic Resonance Elastography to Evaluate the Early Effects of Bariatric Surgery on Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

Tan, Hong Chang; Shumbayawonda, Elizabeth; Beyer, Cayden; Cheng, Lionel Tim-Ee; Low, Albert; Lim, Chin Hong; Eng, Alvin; Chan, Weng Hoong; Lee, Phong Ching; Tay, Mei Fang; Kin, Stella; Chang, Jason Pik Eu; Bee, Yong Mong; Goh, George Boon Bee

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/4228321

International Journal of Biomedical Imaging

On this page

Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion Data Availability Ethical Approval Conflicts of Interest Acknowledgments Supplementary Materials References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2023 | Article ID 4228321 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/4228321

Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Magnetic Resonance Elastography to Evaluate the Early Effects of Bariatric Surgery on Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

Hong Chang Tan,¹Elizabeth Shumbayawonda,²Cayden Beyer,²Lionel Tim-Ee Cheng,¹Albert Low,¹Chin Hong Lim,¹Alvin Eng,¹Weng Hoong Chan,¹Phong Ching Lee,¹Mei Fang Tay,¹Stella Kin,²and Jason Pik Eu Chang¹ et al.

Academic Editor: Jun Zhao

Received21 Apr 2023

Revised05 Jul 2023

Accepted08 Jul 2023

Published19 Jul 2023

Abstract

Background. Bariatric surgery is the most effective treatment for morbid obesity and reduces the severity of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) in the long term. Less is known about the effects of bariatric surgery on liver fat, inflammation, and fibrosis during the early stages following bariatric surgery. Aims. This exploratory study utilises advanced imaging methods to investigate NAFLD and fibrosis changes during the early metabolic transitional period following bariatric surgery. Methods. Nine participants with morbid obesity underwent sleeve gastrectomy. Multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) and magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) were performed at baseline, during the immediate (1 month), and late (6 months) postsurgery period. Liver fat was measured using proton density fat fraction (PDFF), disease activity using iron-correct T1 (cT1), and liver stiffness using MRE. Repeated measured ANOVA was used to assess longitudinal changes and Dunnett’s method for multiple comparisons. Results. All participants (Age years, BMI ) had elevated hepatic steatosis at baseline (PDFF >5%). In the immediate postsurgery period, PDFF decreased significantly from to 8 () and cT1 from to (). These improvements continued to the later postsurgery period. Bariatric surgery did not reduce liver stiffness measurements. Conclusion. Our findings support using MRI as a noninvasive tool to monitor NAFLD in patient with morbid obesity during the early stages following bariatric surgery.

1. Introduction

Obesity is associated with significantly lower health-related quality of life and a higher risk of developing chronic medical conditions such as coronary artery disease, heart failure, stroke [1], and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) [2, 3]. NALFD is considered the hepatic manifestation of metabolic syndrome and is often underdiagnosed. It affects 30% of the global population and up to 95% of those with morbid obesity [2]. As well as being an independent risk factor for adverse cardiometabolic events [4, 5], NAFLD has become the leading reason for liver cancer and liver transplant in the developed world [6].

Effective treatment for NAFLD is urgently needed, but there are no approved pharmacologic treatments for NAFLD. Weight loss remains the cornerstone for disease management [7]. Among weight management treatments, bariatric surgery is the most effective with long-term studies showing its effects on the reduction in liver fat and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) [7]. However, bariatric surgery has been associated with worsening liver fibrosis, cirrhosis, and even liver failure [8]. The reasons for worsening liver health are unclear [9]. Moreover, although long-term studies have shown regression of NAFLD/NASH, few studies have investigated the transient changes in the disease during the early metabolic transitional period following bariatric surgery. Current understanding of the natural history of NAFLD postbariatric surgery has been limited by the need to examine liver tissue histology to diagnose NALFD and stage the severity of hepatic inflammation and fibrosis. Liver biopsy, though useful, is invasive, risky, and not routinely performed during the immediate postsurgery period. Fortunately, new advanced imaging tools have allowed the noninvasive evaluation of NAFLD, disease activity (hepatic fibroinflammation), and fibrosis.

Noninvasive tools have been developed to diagnose, evaluate, and monitor patients with NAFLD for NASH and fibrosis. For instance, iron-corrected T1 (cT1) is a multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) marker of disease activity that can predict clinical outcome [10, 11], treatment response [12], characterize disease [13], and support patient monitoring [14]. Magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) outperforms vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE) in the assessment of liver fibrosis [15] and is considered the best biomarker to assess advanced fibrosis [16] and cirrhosis [17]. MRE also outperforms other fibrosis markers in predicting clinical outcomes [18]. In the context of bariatric surgery, MRI technologies could serve as alternatives to liver biopsy for NASH diagnosis and monitoring [19, 20].

In this study, we used MRI markers (cT1, PDFF, and MRE) to examine the natural history of NAFLD in patients with morbid obesity during the early metabolic transitional period following bariatric surgery. Our aim was to noninvasively monitor early changes in NAFLD/NASH and fibrosis following the intervention.

2. Methods

2.1. Participant Recruitment

Nine individuals with morbid obesity who were scheduled for laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy were recruited and provided written informed consent. All participants were under the care of a multidisciplinary weight management team and did not undergo liver biopsy before or during their surgery. The principles identified in the 1975 Declaration of Helsinki and GCP principles were observed throughout the study. All participant-identifiable information was kept securely and encrypted within the servers at the study site.

Participants were eligible if they were aged between 21 and 65 years and had a with obesity-related complications. They were excluded if they consumed excessive alcohol (>1 unit/day for females and >2 units/day for males), suffer chronic liver disorders other than NAFLD, treated with medications that may induce hepatic steatosis (e.g., methotrexate, amiodarone, and corticosteroids), or have contraindications to MRI. All participants underwent a multiparametric MRI scan and MRE before their surgery (baseline) and postsurgery during the immediate- (1 month) and later-stage (6 months) periods. Participants were asked to fast overnight before their study visits. MRI scans were performed alongside clinical and laboratory assessment (including biochemistry assessment, body composition, and anthropometric measurements (Supplementary Figure 1).

2.2. Laboratory Testing

Biochemical analyses were measured using immunoassay methods. Creatinine, liver panel, lipid profile, glucose, and insulin with Abbott Architect i200, Abbott Diagnostics, and HbA1c with Roche Cobas c501 analyzer, Roche Diagnostics. HOMA-IR was calculated to estimate insulin resistance using fasting glucose and insulin concentrations [21].

2.3. Multiparametric MRI

Noncontrast T1, T2, and PDFF were acquired using the LiverMultiScan® protocol (Perspectum Ltd., Oxford, UK) described elsewhere [22, 23]. Four transverse slices positioned at the porta hepatis were captured using a shortened modified look-locker inversion (shMOLLI) and a multiecho-spoiled gradient-echo sequence to quantify liver T1 and iron (T2) fat (PDFF), respectively. During image analysis, cT1 and PDFF maps of the liver were delineated into whole liver segmentation maps using a semiautomatic method. Three 15 mm diameter circular regions of interest were placed on the transverse T2 maps for each slice, covering a representative sample of the liver, to calculate average T2 values for T1 correction. Nonparenchyma structures such as bile ducts and large blood vessels as well as image artifacts were excluded from image analysis.

2.4. Magnetic Resonance Elastography

MRE examinations were performed using a 2-dimensional MRE protocol [24] with the interpretation of MRE images to obtain stiffness values performed by abdominal radiologists following accepted protocols [25].

2.5. Body Composition: Adipose Tissue Volumes and Muscle Mass

Lean body mass (LBM), fat-free mass (FFM), and fat mass (FM) were measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (Hologic Discovery Wi densitometer, Hologic, Inc., Massachusetts, USA). For delineation of visceral (VAT) and subcutaneous (SAT) adipose tissue, as well as skeletal muscle index (SMI), a single 2D slice positioned at the 3^rd lumbar (L3) vertebrae was extracted from whole-body DIXON MR images. The L3 slice was selected as this region has shown to be strongly associated with whole-body skeletal muscle distribution and accurately estimates total SAT and VAT volumes [26–28]. Cross-sectional areas of SAT, VAT, and skeletal muscle were manually segmented using ITK-SNAP software (version 3.8.0) [29] and are reported as cm². SMI was calculated by indexing the cm² values of lean muscle to the squared height of the participant (cm²/m²).

All scans were performed on 1.5 T Siemens Avanto systems (Siemens Healthineers, Germany) in the same acquisition. Apart from MRE, all images were analysed by trained analysts blinded to the clinical data. In this study, no additional incidental findings were identified following the addition of the MRI scan.

2.6. Statistical Analysis

Descriptive statistics were used to summarise participant characteristics. Categorical variables were reported as the frequency and percentage while continuous variables were reported as mean standard deviation. Changes in the investigated parameters were reported as relative percentages.

Repeated measure ANOVA was used to test changes in the measured outcomes between visits. Postsurgery values in the immediate and late postsurgery period were also compared to the baseline using Dunnett’s test for multiple comparisons.

All statistical analyses were performed in STATA version 17 (StataCorp) and Prism version 9 (GraphPad Software Inc.), and a value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. Baseline Assessment

The participants (5 males and 4 females, aged 31-58 years) had morbid obesity with an average BMI of and a body fat percentage of (Table 1). Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and hyperlipidaemia were the most common comorbidity with a prevalence of 67%, while a third of the participants had hypertension.

3.2. Effect of Bariatric Surgery on Clinical Parameters

All participants underwent laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and returned for their postsurgery follow-up visits at weeks and weeks. At the immediate postop follow-up period, total body weight, BMI, fat mass, fat mass %, and waist circumference decreased significantly from baseline (Table 1). Serum ALP, GGT, HbA1C, insulin, and HOMA-IR were also significantly lower (Table 1). These metabolic and anthropometric parameters continued to improve in the late postsurgery period (Table 1). Fat-free mass did not decrease significantly following bariatric surgery.

3.3. Effect of Bariatric Surgery on Liver Fat, Liver Fibroinflammation, and Liver Stiffness

All participants had hepatic steatosis (PDFF ≥5%), and in the first month following bariatric surgery, liver fat was reduced by 36.9% (Figure 1, Supplementary table 1). By the late postsurgery period, hepatic steatosis decreased by 65.2% and resolved in all but three participants (Table 2, Figure 1). Similarly, cT1 also decreased significantly during the immediate postsurgery period with a relative reduction of 4.8% compared to baseline. However, further decrease in cT1 in the later postsurgery period did not reach statistical significance (Table 2, Figure 1). Figure 2 illustrates cT1 and PDFF maps across all three study visits. An illustration of T2 maps across all three study visits is shown in Supplementary Figure 2. At baseline, the average MRE liver stiffness was , and LSM did not show any statistically significant changes throughout the 6-month postsurgery period (Table 2, Figure 1).

(a)

(b)

(c)

(a)

(b)

4. Discussion

This study describes the ability of mpMRI and MRE to monitor NAFLD and fibrosis in individuals with morbid obesity during the early metabolic transitional period following bariatric surgery. We found significant reductions in hepatic fat (PDFF) and disease activity (cT1) throughout the evaluation period. By contrast, liver stiffness (fibrosis) did not decrease.

The diagnosis and staging of NALFD conventionally rely on histological examination of liver tissue obtained from liver biopsy. This procedure is invasive and makes it more difficult for clinicians to diagnose, stage, and monitor NAFLD, especially in obese patients [30]. Advanced imaging techniques (such as MRE, VCTE, and cT1) have been developed as noninvasive alternatives to liver biopsy [31]. Our study used mpMRI and MRE to diagnose and monitor the evolution of NAFLD following bariatric surgery. Body imaging can be technically challenging in patients with very high BMI, and we believe that our approach has several advantages in the population with morbid obesity compared to other existing techniques. For instance, MRI is less affected by body habitus than other technologies (including sonography, transient elastography, shear-wave elastography, and computed tomography) [32]. Ultrasound is often used as a first-line screening tool. However, in addition to the penetration limit, ultrasound lacks the specificity and sensitivity required to diagnose NAFLD severity and monitor disease activity [32]. In addition, although conventional unenhanced CT can detect and quantify advanced steatosis, it is inaccurate at diagnosing milder stages of steatosis and involves the use of radiation [32].

MRI PDFF is the gold standard for noninvasive assessment of hepatic steatosis and its response to intervention [33, 34]. This is predominantly driven by its continuous assessment of the whole liver (compared to the categorical assessment provided by liver biopsy steatosis grading) [35]. Moreover, MRI PDFF outperforms other techniques such as CAP [35] and ultrasound [35] in the assessment of liver fat. However, PDFF is not a reliable method to differentiate simple hepatic steatosis from NASH and NASH fibrosis as liver fat often decreases when liver fibrosis worsens. By contrast, cT1 assesses liver tissue for both fibrosis and inflammation, correlates well with hepatocyte ballooning, and is a reliable predictor of liver disease progression [33, 36, 37]. The assessment of liver inflammation (particularly with the NASH CRN grading system) is known to have very low inter and intrareader agreement [38]. Characterisation of inflammation plays a key role in the evaluation of disease progression/regression, and thus, correctly quantifying the inflammatory disease burden in the organ under investigation is of paramount importance. cT1 has been shown to have good utility in the evaluation of liver inflammation and disease regression/progression in inflammatory diseases such as autoimmune hepatitis [11]. Therefore, in addition to supporting NASH disease activity, cT1 also provides useful information on changes in liver inflammation [11, 39].

Despite the advantages of cT1, this measurement is not a pure marker of liver fibrosis; thus, additional markers to assess liver fibrosis should be used in conjunction. Our study used MRE to measure liver fibrosis. MRE outperforms vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE) in diagnosing advanced fibrosis and, compared to other fibrosis markers such as enhanced liver fibrosis (ELF) score, fibrosis-4 (FIB-4), and shear wave elastography (SWE), predicts clinical outcomes in cirrhotic populations more accurately [33]. Therefore, by combining mpMRI (measuring PDFF and cT1) and MRE, we could understand NAFLD disease progression in the early stages following bariatric surgery better. Furthermore, the imaging was performed in a single scanning session, making it logistically convenient.

In addition to hepatic imaging, we performed a longitudinal assessment of body composition and adipose tissue (VAT, SAT, and SMI). Like earlier studies [40], we found that fat loss was the greatest and most rapid in the liver, followed by the visceral and subcutaneous tissue. By contrast, fat-free mass was preserved. A relative reduction in liver fat by 30% or 80 ms reduction in cT1 is related to a histological treatment response (2-point change in the NALFD activity score (NAS) with no worsening in fibrosis or 1-point change in fibrosis with no worsening of NASH), while a 46 ms change is indicated as clinically meaningful [41]. Our results reaffirm these findings and show that the improvements in PDFF and cT1 indicate clinically meaningful improvements in participants’ liver health following bariatric surgery. With the significant reduction in liver fat and fibroinflammation, it would be reasonable to expect similar improvements in liver stiffness. However, MRE-measured LSM values did not show any significant changes following surgery. This discrepancy may be because hepatic fibrosis changes are slower [42] than improvements in hepatic steatosis and inflammation [43]. Thus, a longer period may be needed to detect any significant improvement in liver stiffness. Furthermore, none of our patients had significant liver fibrosis at baseline.

There are concerns regarding the worsening of NASH or fibrosis following bariatric surgery [5]. Our imaging method provides clinicians with a comprehensive and temporally accurate method to characterize the liver health of individuals undergoing bariatric surgery. In addition, none of our participants experienced a deterioration in liver health following the bariatric intervention. Hence, our findings support the adoption of bariatric surgery as a primary treatment for NAFLD in patients with morbid obesity, especially in those with NASH and hepatic fibrosis, and the use of mpMRI markers for monitoring.

Our study had some limitations. Although our sample size was small and should be confirmed in larger studies, our results are consistent with those presented in the literature. None of the participants had advanced liver fibrosis, and thus, the potential impact of bariatric surgery and subsequent changes in mpMRI and MRE in participants with more advanced disease will need to be evaluated in future studies. Future work should evaluate the utility of such MRI technologies over longer follow-up periods. All participants in this study underwent sleeve gastrectomy, and it remains uncertain whether other procedures such as Roux-en-Y gastric bypass would produce similar changes.

In conclusion, our findings support using MRI biomarkers as a noninvasive tool to monitor NAFLD in patient with morbid obesity during the early stages following bariatric surgery.

Data Availability

The data and analytic methods used in this study remain the property of the individual study sponsors. All deidentified participant data may be made available to other researchers upon request following permission, investigator support, and following a signed data access agreement.

Ethical Approval

This study received approval from the SingHealth Centralized Institutional Review Board (CIRB Ref: 2019/2179).

Conflicts of Interest

ES, SK, and CB are employees of Perspectum Ltd., the developer of LiverMultiScan®, and are involved in the analysis of the work and the preparation of the manuscript. HCT, LC, AL, CHL, AE, WHC, PCL, MFT, JPEC, and GBBG have no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this article.

Acknowledgments

This paper presents independent research funded by the National Medical Research Council Center Grant (grant: NMRC/CG/M011/2017 SGH) and the ASTAR Industry Alignment Fund (Pre-Positioning), titled “Diabetes Clinic of the Future” (grant ref: H19/01/a01/023). We would like to thank the patients recruited into this study for their participation. We would also like to acknowledge Vieon Wu and Sabina Au Yong for coordinating this study.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Table 1: relative changes in body composition, anthropometric measures, biochemical markers, and MRI markers in the 6 months following bariatric surgery. All reductions are indicated by negative percentages while all increases (▲) are indicated in blue. Supplementary Figure 1: consort diagram showing the identification, recruitment, and active study procedures followed in this study. VAT: visceral adipose tissue; SAT: subcutaneous adipose tissue; SMI: skeletal muscle index; MRE: magnetic resonance elastography; PDFF: proton density fat fraction; cT1: iron-corrected T1. Supplementary Figure 2: changes in T2 maps across the three monitoring (baseline, immediate, and late postsurgery) visits. (Supplementary Materials)

References

F. X. Pi-Sunyer, “Comorbidities of overweight and obesity: current evidence and research issues,” Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, vol. 31, Supplement 1, pp. S602–S608, 1999, PMID: 10593535.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. F. Godoy-Matos, W. S. Silva Júnior, and C. M. Valerio, “NAFLD as a continuum: from obesity to metabolic syndrome and diabetes,” Diabetology and Metabolic Syndrome, vol. 12, no. 1, p. 60, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Stephenson, C. M. Smith, B. Kearns, A. Haywood, and P. Bissell, “The association between obesity and quality of life: a retrospective analysis of a large-scale population-based cohort study,” BMC Public Health, vol. 21, no. 1, p. 1990, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. G. Cotter and M. Rinella, “Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease 2020: the state of the disease,” Gastroenterology, vol. 158, no. 7, pp. 1851–1864, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Lassailly, R. Caiazzo, L. C. Ntandja-Wandji et al., “Bariatric surgery provides long-term resolution of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis and regression of fibrosis,” Gastroenterology, vol. 159, no. 4, pp. 1290–1301.e5, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Pais, A. S. Barritt 4th, Y. Calmus et al., “NAFLD and liver transplantation: current burden and expected challenges,” Journal of Hepatology, vol. 65, no. 6, pp. 1245–1257, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Slomski, “Bariatric surgery approaches reduce fatty liver disease,” Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 327, no. 8, p. 710, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Cerreto, F. Santopaolo, A. Gasbarrini, M. Pompili, and F. R. Ponziani, “Bariatric surgery and liver disease: general considerations and role of the gut-liver axis,” Nutrients, vol. 13, no. 8, p. 2649, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, Obesity: Clinical Assessment and Management, The National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE), 2016.
L. S. Jimenez, F. H. Mendonça Chaim, F. D. Mendonça Chaim et al., “Impact of weight regain on the evolution of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a 3-year follow-up,” Obesity Surgery, vol. 28, no. 10, pp. 3131–3135, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Arndtz, E. Shumbayawonda, J. Hodson et al., “Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging, autoimmune hepatitis, and prediction of disease activity,” Hepatology Communications, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 1009–1020, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Eilenberg, F. B. Langer, A. Beer, M. Trauner, G. Prager, and K. Staufer, “Significant liver-related morbidity after bariatric surgery and its reversal-a case series,” Obesity Surgery, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 812–819, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. H. Harrison, Q. M. Anstee, and R. Loomba, “Noninvasive tests (NITs) in the management of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH),” Gastroenterology and Hepatology, vol. 16, no. 8, p. S1, 2020.
View at: Google Scholar
C. Levick, J. Phillips-Hughes, J. Collier et al., “Non-invasive assessment of portal hypertension by multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging of the spleen: a proof of concept study,” PLoS One, vol. 14, no. 8, article e0221066, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. A. Harrison, S. J. Rossi, A. H. Paredes et al., “NGM282 improves liver fibrosis and histology in 12 weeks in patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis,” Hepatology, vol. 71, no. 4, pp. 1198–1212, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Pavlides, R. Banerjee, E. M. Tunnicliffe et al., “Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for the assessment of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease severity,” Liver International, vol. 37, no. 7, pp. 1065–1073, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. J. Eddowes, N. McDonald, N. Davies et al., “Utility and cost evaluation of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for the assessment of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease,” Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics, vol. 47, no. 5, pp. 631–644, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. McDonald, P. J. Eddowes, J. Hodson et al., “Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for quantitation of liver disease: a two-centre cross-sectional observational study,” Scientific Reports, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 9189, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. M. Allen, V. H. Shah, T. M. Therneau et al., “The role of three-dimensional magnetic resonance elastography in the diagnosis of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis in obese patients undergoing bariatric surgery,” Hepatology, vol. 71, no. 2, pp. 510–521, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. M. Allen, V. H. Shah, T. M. Therneau et al., “Multiparametric magnetic resonance elastography improves the detection of NASH regression following bariatric surgery,” Hepatology Communications, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 185–192, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. R. Matthews, J. P. Hosker, A. S. Rudenski, B. A. Naylor, D. F. Treacher, and R. C. Turner, “Homeostasis model assessment: insulin resistance and beta-cell function from fasting plasma glucose and insulin concentrations in man,” Diabetologia, vol. 28, no. 7, pp. 412–419, 1985.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Mojtahed, C. J. Kelly, A. H. Herlihy et al., “Reference range of liver corrected T1 values in a population at low risk for fatty liver disease-a UK Biobank sub-study, with an appendix of interesting cases,” Abdominal Radiology, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 72–84, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. Bachtiar, M. D. Kelly, H. R. Wilman et al., “Repeatability and reproducibility of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging of the liver,” PLoS One, vol. 14, no. 4, article e0214921, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Yin, J. A. Talwalkar, K. J. Glaser et al., “Assessment of hepatic fibrosis with magnetic resonance elastography,” Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, vol. 5, no. 10, pp. 1207–1213.e2, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Chen, J. A. Talwalkar, M. Yin, K. J. Glaser, S. O. Sanderson, and R. L. Ehman, “Early detection of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease by using MR elastography,” Radiology, vol. 259, no. 3, pp. 749–756, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. W. Demerath, W. Shen, M. Lee et al., “Approximation of total visceral adipose tissue with a single magnetic resonance image,” The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 85, no. 2, pp. 362–368, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Shen, M. Punyanitya, Z. Wang et al., “Total body skeletal muscle and adipose tissue volumes: estimation from a single abdominal cross-sectional image,” Journal of Applied Physiology, vol. 97, no. 6, pp. 2333–2338, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Schweitzer, C. Geisler, M. Pourhassan et al., “What is the best reference site for a single MRI slice to assess whole-body skeletal muscle and adipose tissue volumes in healthy adults?” The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 102, no. 1, pp. 58–65, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. A. Yushkevich, J. Piven, H. C. Hazlett et al., “User-guided 3D active contour segmentation of anatomical structures: significantly improved efficiency and reliability,” NeuroImage, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 1116–1128, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Neuberger, J. Patel, H. Caldwell et al., “Guidelines on the use of liver biopsy in clinical practice from the British Society of Gastroenterology, the Royal College of Radiologists and the Royal College of Pathology,” Gut, vol. 69, no. 8, pp. 1382–1403, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Kugelmas, M. Noureddin, N. Gunn et al., “The use of current knowledge and non-invasive testing modalities for predicting at-risk non-alcoholic steatohepatitis and assessing fibrosis,” Liver International, vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 964–974, 2023.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. N. Zhang, K. J. Fowler, G. Hamilton et al., “Liver fat imaging-a clinical overview of ultrasound, CT, and MR imaging,” The British Journal of Radiology, vol. 91, no. 1089, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Imajo, L. Tetlow, A. Dennis et al., “Quantitative multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging can aid non-alcoholic steatohepatitis diagnosis in a Japanese cohort,” World Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 27, no. 7, pp. 609–623, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. S. Middleton, E. R. Heba, C. A. Hooker et al., “Agreement between magnetic resonance imaging proton density fat fraction measurements and pathologist-assigned steatosis grades of liver biopsies from adults with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis,” Gastroenterology, vol. 153, no. 3, pp. 753–761, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Imajo, T. Kessoku, Y. Honda et al., “Magnetic resonance imaging more accurately classifies steatosis and fibrosis in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease than transient elastography,” Gastroenterology, vol. 150, no. 3, pp. 626–637.e7, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. N. A. Jayaswal, C. Levick, E. A. Selvaraj et al., “Prognostic value of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging, transient elastography and blood-based fibrosis markers in patients with chronic liver disease,” Liver International, vol. 40, no. 12, pp. 3071–3082, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Andersson, M. Kelly, K. Imajo et al., “Clinical utility of magnetic resonance imaging biomarkers for identifying nonalcoholic steatohepatitis patients at high risk of progression: a multicenter pooled data and meta-analysis,” Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, vol. 20, pp. 2451–2461.e3, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. A. Davison, S. A. Harrison, G. Cotter et al., “Suboptimal reliability of liver biopsy evaluation has implications for randomized clinical trials,” Journal of Hepatology, vol. 73, no. 6, pp. 1322–1332, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Muratori, A. W. Lohse, and M. Lenzi, “Diagnosis and management of autoimmune hepatitis,” BMJ, vol. 380, article e070201, 2023.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. C. Meyer-Gerspach, R. Peterli, M. Moor et al., “Quantification of liver, subcutaneous, and visceral adipose tissues by MRI before and after bariatric surgery,” Obesity Surgery, vol. 29, no. 9, pp. 2795–2805, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Dennis, M. D. Kelly, C. Fernandes et al., “Correlations between MRI biomarkers PDFF and cT1 with histopathological features of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis,” Frontiers in Endocrinology, vol. 11, article 575843, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Eslam, S. K. Sarin, V. W. Wong et al., “The Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of metabolic associated fatty liver disease,” Hepatology International, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 889–919, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. J. M. Heyens, D. Busschots, G. H. Koek, G. Robaeys, and S. Francque, “Liver fibrosis in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: from liver biopsy to non-invasive biomarkers in diagnosis and treatment,” Frontiers in Medicine, vol. 8, no. 8, article 615978, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2023 Hong Chang Tan et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

716

Downloads

556

Citations