Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
International Journal of Dentistry
Volume 2012 (2012), Article ID 307024, 8 pages
Review Article

Current Status and Future Development of Cell Transplantation Therapy for Periodontal Tissue Regeneration

Institute of Advanced Biomedical Engineering and Science, Tokyo Women's Medical University, 8-1 Kawata-cho, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 162-8666, Japan

Received 3 August 2011; Accepted 6 October 2011

Academic Editor: Kazuo Tanne

Copyright © 2012 Toshiyuki Yoshida et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


It has been shown that stem cell transplantation can regenerate periodontal tissue, and several clinical trials involving transplantation of stem cells into human patients have already begun or are in preparation. However, stem cell transplantation therapy is a new technology, and the events following transplantation are poorly understood. Several studies have reported side effects and potential risks associated with stem cell transplantation therapy. To protect patients from such risks, governments have placed regulations on stem cell transplantation therapies. It is important for the clinicians to understand the relevant risks and governmental regulations. This paper describes the ongoing clinical studies, basic research, risks, and governmental controls related to stem cell transplantation therapy. Then, one clinical study is introduced as an example of a government-approved periodontal cell transplantation therapy.

1. Introduction

Since the 1980s, periodontal ligament cells have been considered a reliable source for periodontal regeneration. Nyman et al. reported that periodontal ligament (PDL) tissue possesses periodontal regenerative properties [1]. Based on this regenerative concept, several procedures have been introduced for the selective proliferation of PDL stem cells, such as guided tissue regeneration and enamel matrix derivative [2]. However, the desired regenerative outcomes have not been attained, especially for patients with severe periodontal defects. Experimental approaches to overcome the limitations of existing therapies have included the ex vivo expansion of stem cells derived from PDL, bone marrow, adipose tissue, and alveolar periosteum for transplantation as stem cell replacement therapy in animal studies. These studies have indicated that the transplantation of stem cells can be an effective treatment for periodontal defects [2]. As a consequence of these successful animal studies, the clinical application of stem cells for the regeneration of periodontal tissue has begun. However, the efficacy and safety of such cell-based therapies have not been fully evaluated, and the risks of stem cell therapies have been underscored by several clinicians and researchers. In this paper, we first review the current research targeting cell-based therapies for periodontal regeneration and then discuss the risks and governmental controls of stem cell transplantation therapy. Last, we will introduce our ongoing clinical study that was approved by the regulatory authority of the Japanese government.

2. Current Progress in Periodontal Cell Transplantation Therapy

2.1. Periodontal Ligament-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells (PDL-MSCs)

Previous studies that reported the regenerative properties of PDL using animal models indicated the existence of stem cells in PDL tissue [3, 4]. Liu et al. reported that autologous PDL-MSCs enhanced regeneration of periodontal tissue, including alveolar bone, cementum and PDL in a minipig [5]. Feng et al. transplanted autologous PDL progenitors to three patients who suffered from periodontal disease. The results showed periodontal regeneration with no adverse effect [6]. Tissue engineering techniques have been applied to improve these cell-based therapies. Okano et al. developed a temperature-responsive cell culture technique to permit the harvest of adherent cultured cells by simply lowering the temperature [7, 8]. Our group produced PDL-derived cell sheets using this temperature-responsive culture dish and found that the cell sheets had a potential to promote regeneration of periodontal tissue, which was composed of bone, cementum, and PDL, in vivo (Figure 1) [912].

Figure 1: Periodontal tissue regeneration using PDL cell sheets. (a) Sheets of polyglycolic acid (arrowhead) with or without the cell sheets were applied onto the root surfaces of canine mandibular premolars. (b) Bone defects were filled with -TCP. (c, e) Thick, newly formed cementum (arrow) and dense collagen fibres were observed in the PDL of the PDL sheet-transplanted group. (d, f) The immunohistochemical detection of neurofilament protein revealed that newly formed nerve fibres were only observed in the group given the PDL sheets (arrow). Scale bars: 100 μm in (c) and (e); 50 μm in (d) and (f). B: newly formed bone, P: periodontal ligament, and D: root dentin. Modified from [13] with permission.

Allogeneic transplantation of PDL-MSCs into bone defects in minipigs has been shown to result in periodontal regeneration without significant immunological rejection [5]. It has also been shown that porcine PDL-MSCs possess a low immunogenicity and immunosuppressive function [14]. These data could shed light on the potential of allogeneic transplantations using PDL-MSCs at the clinical level and, thus, broaden the range of opportunities for cell transplantation therapy.

2.2. Periosteal Cells

Periosteal cells have been reported to be a potential source of cells for the regeneration of periodontal tissue [15, 16]. Recently, Mizuno et al. reported that cultured autologous periosteal cell membranes induced regeneration of periodontal tissues including bone, cementum, and periodontal ligament in a canine model of a class III furcation defect [17]. Following the results of these studies, clinical trials for cell transplantation therapy using periosteal cells were conducted. Human periosteal cell sheets with platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and hydroxyapatite (HA) were transplanted into 30 patients who suffered from chronic periodontitis, and this treatment was found to enhance periodontal regeneration [18].

2.3. Bone-Marrow-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells (BM-MSCs)

Bone-marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (BM-MSCs) have the potential to differentiate into various types of tissue, including bone, cartilage, adipose, muscle, and periodontal tissue [1922]. Recent in vivo studies have shown that BM-MSCs could induce periodontal regeneration [21, 23]. Clinical trials using BM-MSCs with PRP have also been conducted, and the results indicated that periodontal regeneration could be induced by this approach as well [24].

2.4. Adipose-Derived Stem Cells (ADSCs)

Adipose-derived stem cells (ADSCs) are a useful source for cell transplantation therapy because this tissue is abundant and easy to obtain compared with other sources. ADSCs have been shown to be capable of differentiating into various tissue types [2629]. It is reported that ADSCs mixed with PRP had the potential to regenerate periodontal defects in vivo [3032], which supports the use of ADSCs in cell transplantation therapy for periodontal regeneration.

2.5. Gingival Fibroblast

To recover gingival recession, a cell transplantation therapy using gingival fibroblasts has been developed. For this technique, gingival fibroblast sheets were obtained by culturing gingival fibroblasts on collagen sponges [33]. The autologous gingival fibroblast sheets were then transplanted to 14 sites in 4 patients suffering from periodontal disease in order to achieve root coverage. The results demonstrated regeneration of gingival tissue and suggested that gingival fibroblasts could be readily harvested and prepared for transplantation [34].

2.6. ES/iPS Cells

Because embryonic stem (ES) cells and induced pluripotent (iPS) cells can differentiate into all types of somatic cells, so-called pluripotency, they are thought to be the ultimate cellular source for regenerative therapies. Recently, clinical trials using ES cells have begun in the United States. However, tumorigenesis is a common concern with this application of ES/iPS cells. Thus, it is highly desired to achieve commitment of the ES/iPS cells to a differentiated state prior to transfer. Tada et al. demonstrated the differentiation of ES/iPS cells into a mesodermal lineage [35] and Duann et al. demonstrated alveolar bone regeneration by iPS cells in an animal model [36]. Furthermore, recent reports have indicated the sparse existence of pluripotent cells among MSCs [37, 38], which expands the possibilities for the use of pluripotent cells in cell transplantation therapy. However, little is known about the mechanisms and pathways that control the differentiation. Further studies are therefore needed in regard to periodontal regenerative therapy.

3. Characteristics and Future of MSC

Because the PDL, bone marrow, adipose, and periosteal tissues are thought to contain MSCs, cells from these tissues can be used to regenerate mesenchymal tissue, including alveolar bone and periodontal ligament. MSCs were first identified from bone marrow as plastic-adherent fibroblastic cells and shown to possess a multipotency to differentiate into multiple mesenchymal lineages, such as osteocytes, chondrocytes, and adipocytes [39, 40]. As early as 1995, MSCs from multiple sources were transplanted into patients because of their proliferative property, immunomodulatory, and trophic effects [41].

Cells extracted enzymatically from tissue tend to possess proliferative capacities and multipotency. In the dental field, the multipotency of dental pulp cells was first described by Gronthos et al. [42]. This group introduced a method for digesting tissue with enzymes that dramatically expanded stem cell research in the dental field. Compared to conventional outgrowth methods, enzyme treatment allows for the harvest of a variety of cell types, such as fibroblastic cells, vascular cells, and nerve cells, among others [42]. Furthermore, the characteristics of these cells have been shown to become homogenised during cultivation.

For clinical considerations, each type of MSC has advantages and disadvantages. PDL-MSCs have been shown to exhibit a greater regenerative capacity for PDL tissue compared to BM-MSCs and periosteal cells in canine one wall defect, model for severe periodontal defect [13]. Because clinicians routinely extract teeth, autologous PDL-MSCs can easily be obtained from patients. However, PDL-MSCs cannot be applied to patients who lack teeth to be extracted. Periosteal cells are more easily and abundantly harvested than PDL-MSCs and BM-MSCs, although periosteal cells require a longer culture period to obtain a sufficient number of cells for transplantation as compared to PDL-MSCs [17, 43]. BM-MSCs have been transplanted into many patients in various clinical studies and are thought to be suitable for cell transplantation therapy due to their multipotency and high cellular proliferation rate. However, the collection of bone marrow requires patients hospitalised. Although there are many data from animals and cells study, there is not enough clinical data to compare the efficacy of each type of MSC and the efficacy on severe periodontal defect including horizontal defect. Thus, it is currently difficult to draw conclusions about which MSC is most suitable for human periodontal regenerative therapy.

Recent studies have revealed that MSCs can be extracted from other tissues. One group of researchers demonstrated that MSCs are localised in the perivascular compartment [44]. Park et al. reported that PDL-MSCs could also be obtained from inflamed PDL tissue [45]. Because inflamed PDL tissue can be collected during periodontal treatment, it is possible that this technology will broaden the range of indications for cell transplantation therapy using PDL-MSCs.

4. Guarantees of Safety and Efficacy for Stem Cell Transplantation Therapy

Stem cell transplantation therapy is a promising technology that can regenerate periodontal tissue. However, the efficacy and safety of cell transplantation therapies are not well understood. There have been several clinical reports and reviews published that describe the risks and side effects of stem cell therapies. To protect patients from such risks, regulatory bodies in several countries have begun to establish guidelines and regulations for the control of stem cell therapies. Therefore, it is imperative that clinicians who aim to undertake stem cell therapies understand the associated risks and regulations. In the following section, we provide an overview of the risks related to stem cell therapies and then describe our work on a clinical study that was approved by the regulatory authorities of the Japanese government.

5. Risks of Stem Cell Transplantation Therapy

Many scientists suppose and indicate the risks of stem cell transplantation [4648]. Indeed, severe side effects from stem cell therapies have been reported. One major concern about stem cell transplantation therapy is the tumorigenic property of the stem cells themselves. Notably, the formation of a transplanted cell-derived brain tumour in a patient who received neural stem cell transplantation was reported [49], although the precise mechanisms responsible for the formation of this tumour remain unclear. For MSC-based transplantation, no tumour formation has been reported during the course of clinical studies involving periodontal cell therapies [46, 50]. However, because the tumorigenic potentials of cells are thought to vary by cell type and application site, the risk of tumour formation must be investigated in the context of each type of cell transplantation therapy.

Other risks associated with stem cell transplantation therapy have been suggested, including those associated with cell harvesting, cell culture, the site of administration, and the interaction between the transplanted cells and the recipient’s immune system [48, 51]. Because stem cell transplantation therapy is a new type of treatment, there are few published data on the fate of stem cells after transplantation. Therefore, it is important to confirm the safety of these approaches before applying them to patients, and all data related to the clinical course of each cell transplantation therapy should be recorded. As a result, these strategies should help to reduce patient risk.

6. Governmental Control over Cell Transplantation Therapy

In recent years, many new cell therapies have been developed, and their numbers continue to grow. However, there are many cell therapies that are inadequately designed, lacking evidences of efficacy, safety, and patient protection. For the protection of patients from such cell therapies, the governing bodies of Japan, the European Union, and the United States have been establishing regulations over the control of the quality of cell transplantation therapies based on Good Clinical Practice (GCP) and Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP).

GCP is an international ethical and scientific quality standard that applies to clinical studies and governs their design and patient protection [52]. According to GCP, data and plans, including the evidence, potential risks and benefits of the cell transplantation therapy, the protection of patients’ rights, the scientific propriety of the protocol, and data management, must be approved by the institutional review board and independent ethics committee. GMP governs the cell culture processes for cell transplantation therapy [53]. GMP requires that the materials, protocols, tools, and environments used for cell transplantation therapy are guaranteed as safe and effective. GMP also requires a record of all cell culture procedures to be kept in the laboratory for traceability.

Conforming to these regulations requires significant amounts of work and carries a high cost [54]. Cell transplantation therapy under such regulations are often too expensive and too late for patients who are in critical need. Therefore, existing mainstream regulations are sometimes criticised as overly strict and repressive. Indeed, patients who wish to receive cell transplantation therapy have been known to travel to countries where little or no regulation of these procedures is required to receive the therapy; this is referred to as “stem cell tourism” [5456]. However, the safety and efficacy of many of these therapies have either been questioned or entirely invalidated. Several such cell therapies have been shown to exhibit no effect, and several patients have died from diseases or complications resulting from the cell transplantations [55, 5761]. It is therefore important for clinicians to implement cell transplantation therapies only after their efficacy and safety have been validated.

7. Preparation for Clinical Trial

Our clinical study of periodontal regenerative therapy using cell sheet technology has been prepared according to the guidelines of the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare. As we previously demonstrated that PDL cell sheets were effective for periodontal tissue regeneration in animal models [9, 11, 62], we have prepared for clinical trial with this transfer approach. The methods of autologous cell transplantation and cell culture with autologous serum were selected to avoid potential infections from animals or other people. To reduce the risk of tumour formation and to enhance hard tissue formation, the cells were cultured in medium that promoted osteoblastic differentiation after they had been seeded onto temperature-responsive culture dishes.

We optimised a protocol for harvesting human PDL cells that would retain their proliferative, osteogenic, and multipotency [43]. Regarding the validation of the quality of the cell sheets, we found that periostin and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) could be used as quality-control markers of PDL and osteoblast differentiation, respectively [43]. Next, using a canine model for a preclinical study, we investigated the periodontal regenerative capacity of cell sheets that were prepared according to this protocol. The results indicated that the combined use of autologous PDL cell sheets and -tricalcium phosphate was able to regenerate alveolar bone and periodontal ligament tissue at defective sites [12].

We also established a culture protocol for the preparation of cell sheets that can be applied to patients. PDL cell culture was performed in a clean suite known as the Cell Processing Center (CPC). The CPC is composed of several rooms with controlled air flow in addition to separated personnel and material line of flow to maintain the cleanliness of the room and to prevent any possible contamination between personnel and cells [63]. All of the work in the CPC was carried out according to the Standard Operating Procedure (SOP), a cell culture working protocol that ensures the quality of the cell sheets. The work in the CPC was always performed by 2 individuals; one performed the culture procedures and the other directed the procedures to avoid human error and to keep a record of all of the procedures (Figure 2) [63].

Figure 2: CPC of Tokyo Women’s Medical University. (a) Individuals who work in the CPC wear sterile clothing, gloves, caps, and masks to avoid releasing possible contaminants. (b) All tubes and dishes were labelled to avoid misidentification.

After establishing this SOP, we investigated the safety of the cell sheets that were prepared in this manner. We demonstrated that the cell sheets were free of contamination by bacteria or mycoplasma [25]. Because several studies had indicated that transformation of cells occurred during culture [64, 65], both in vitro and in vivo tumorigenicity tests were carried out [25]. Karyotype testing revealed that no chromosomal abnormalities related to tumorigenicity or other diseases had occurred in the cultured human PDL cells (Figure 3). By the soft agar test, cells from the PDL cell sheets exhibited no evidence of tumorigenic potential in vitro. Furthermore, the injection of cells isolated from PDL cell sheets into immunodeficient mice caused no tumour formation, whereas the injection of cancer cells reliably caused tumours to form (Figure 4) [25].

Figure 3: Karyotype of cultured human PDL cells. (a) G-banding staining revealed that the number, banding, and shape of the chromosomes were normal. (b) Multiplex fluorescence in situ hybridization (M-FISH) that visualises each chromosome in a different colour showed that no chromosomal aberrations, including translocation, had occurred.
Figure 4: Tumorigenic and regenerative properties of human PDL cell sheets. (a)–(c) Tumorigenesis in vivo. Immunodeficient mice were injected with medium only (negative control), human PDL cells, or HeLa S3 cells (positive control). Mice injected with human PDL cells or the medium control did not form tumour-like tissue (a, b), whereas mice injected with HeLa S3 cells exhibited tumour formation (c). (d)–(f) Histology and immunohistochemistry of implanted human PDL cell sheets with dentin blocks. Newly formed cementum- (arrow) and PDL-like tissue (arrowheads) were observed around the dentin blocks (d, e). Immunostaining with an antibody against human vimentin revealed the presence of human PDL cells around the dentin block (f). Scale bars: 500 μm in (a) and (b); 1 mm in (c); 50 μm in (d)–(f). Modified from [25] with permission.

Next, we confirmed the in vivo and in vitro regenerative properties of the cell sheets that had been prepared according the SOP. For in vitro analysis, the cell sheets were found to be composed of adequate numbers of living cells that expressed periostin and ALP [25]. We then transplanted cell sheets with dentin blocks into immunodeficient mice and confirmed the formation of PDL- and cementum-like tissue around the dentin block (Figure 4) [25]. We also prepared a document that contained a full record of these procedures and the resulting data for submission to the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare. This clinical study of PDL cell sheet transplantation was approved in January 2011.

As previously mentioned, the generation of cell transplantation materials according to the specified regulations is an enormously expensive and time-consuming process. For example, the CPC cost 2 million US dollars to build and 15,000 US dollars per year to maintain [63]. The performance of the safety and efficacy tests and the preparation of the necessary paperwork also represent significant burdens for the clinicians and associated university staff. Nevertheless, we believe that governmentally regulated cell transplantation therapy remains the best option for patients. One clinical solution may be the formation of collaborations between academic medical centres with existing CPCs. In this way, the outside clinician would collect tissue from a patient and send it to the university, where the cells could be harvested and cultured in a CPC and then sent back to the clinician for the cell transplantation therapy. For this purpose, Nozaki et al. developed a special container capable of maintaining an internal temperature of 37°C for more than 30 hours without a power supply. Using this container, cell sheets could be harvested without losing viability after 8 hours of transportation [66]. Another solution may be the use of closed or automated cell culture systems. There are several GMP-compliant automated cell culture systems currently available. Although the necessary equipment is expensive, the total cost would probably be far less than that of building and maintaining a CPC.

8. Conclusion

In this paper, we have provided an overview of the state of periodontal regenerative therapy using stem cells. Many patients suffer from periodontitis, and clinicians have struggled to regenerate the lost alveolar bone. Stem cell therapy is a promising nascent therapy that may allow the regeneration of lost periodontal tissue. Although there are many issues that need to be resolved before stem cell therapies become common, clinicians should continue to keep a watchful eye on the progression.


The authors thank Professor Norio Ueno at the Tokyo Women’s Medical University for his assistance. This study was partially funded by the Formation of Innovation Center for Fusion of Advanced Technologies and the Special Coordination Funds for Promoting Science and Technology from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology (MEXT), Japan.


  1. S. Nyman, J. Lindhe, T. Karring, and H. Rylander, “New attachment following surgical treatment of human periodontal disease,” Journal of Clinical Periodontology, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 290–296, 1982. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. I. Ishikawa, T. Iwata, K. Washio et al., “Cell sheet engineering and other novel cell-based approaches to periodontal regeneration,” Periodontology 2000, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 220–238, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. A. Dogan, A. Özdemir, A. Kubar, and T. Oygür, “Healing of artificial fenestration defects by seeding of fibroblast-like cells derived from regenerated periodontal ligament in a dog: a preliminary study,” Tissue Engineering, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 1189–1196, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. T. Nakahara, T. Nakamura, E. Kobayashi et al., “In situ tissue engineering of periodontal tissues by seeding with periodontal ligament-derived cells,” Tissue Engineering, vol. 10, no. 3-4, pp. 537–544, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. Y. Liu, Y. Zheng, G. Ding et al., “Periodontal ligament stem cell-mediated treatment for periodontitis in miniature swine,” Stem Cells, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 1065–1073, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. F. Feng, K. Akiyama, Y. Liu et al., “Utility of PDL progenitors for in vivo tissue regeneration: a report of 3 cases,” Oral Diseases, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 20–28, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. T. Okano, Y. H. Bae, H. Jacobs, and S. W. Kim, “Thermally on-off switching polymers for drug permeation and release,” Journal of Controlled Release, vol. 11, no. 1-3, pp. 255–265, 1990. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. T. Okano, N. Yamada, H. Sakai, and Y. Sakurai, “A novel recovery system for cultured cells using plasma-treated polystyrene dishes grafted with poly(N-isopropylacrylamide),” Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, vol. 27, no. 10, pp. 1243–1251, 1993. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. T. Akizuki, S. Oda, M. Komaki et al., “Application of periodontal ligament cell sheet for periodontal regeneration: a pilot study in beagle dogs,” Journal of Periodontal Research, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 245–251, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. M. G. Flores, R. Yashiro, K. Washio, M. Yamato, T. Okano, and I. Ishikawa, “Periodontal ligament cell sheet promotes periodontal regeneration in athymic rats,” Journal of Clinical Periodontology, vol. 35, no. 12, pp. 1066–1072, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. M. Hasegawa, M. Yamato, A. Kikuchi, T. Okano, and I. Ishikawa, “Human periodontal ligament cell sheets can regenerate periodontal ligament tissue in an athymic rat model,” Tissue Engineering, vol. 11, no. 3-4, pp. 469–478, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. T. Iwata, M. Yamato, H. Tsuchioka et al., “Periodontal regeneration with multi-layered periodontal ligament-derived cell sheets in a canine model,” Biomaterials, vol. 30, no. 14, pp. 2716–2723, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. Y. Tsumanuma, T. Iwata, K. Washio et al., “Comparison of different tissue-derived stem cell sheets for periodontal regeneration in a canine 1-wall defect model,” Biomaterials, vol. 32, no. 25, pp. 5819–5825, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  14. G. Ding, Y. Liu, W. Wang et al., “Allogeneic periodontal ligament stem cell therapy for periodontitis in swine,” Stem Cells, vol. 28, no. 10, pp. 1829–1838, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. A. S. Breitbart, D. A. Grande, R. Kessler, J. T. Ryaby, R. J. Fitzsimmons, and R. T. Grant, “Tissue engineered bone repair of calvarial defects using cultured periosteal cells,” Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, vol. 101, no. 3, pp. 567–574, discussion 575-276, 1998. View at Google Scholar
  16. K. Horiuchi, N. Amizuka, S. Takeshita et al., “Identification and characterization of a novel protein, periostin, with restricted expression to periosteum and periodontal ligament and increased expression by transforming growth factor β,” Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, vol. 14, no. 7, pp. 1239–1249, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. H. Mizuno, K. I. Hata, K. Kojima, L. J. Bonassar, C. A. Vacanti, and M. Ueda, “A novel approach to regenerating periodontal tissue by grafting autologous cultured periosteum,” Tissue Engineering, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 1227–1235, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. K. Yamamiya, K. Okuda, T. Kawase, K. I. Hata, L. F. Wolff, and H. Yoshie, “Tissue-engineered cultured periosteum used with platelet-rich plasma and hydroxyapatite in treating human osseous defects,” Journal of Periodontology, vol. 79, no. 5, pp. 811–818, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. P. Bossolasco, S. Corti, S. Strazzer et al., “Skeletal muscle differentiation potential of human adult bone marrow cells,” Experimental Cell Research, vol. 295, no. 1, pp. 66–78, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. P. A. Conget and J. J. Minguell, “Phenotypical and functional properties of human bone marrow mesenchymal progenitor cells,” Journal of Cellular Physiology, vol. 181, no. 1, pp. 67–73, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. H. Kawaguchi, A. Hirachi, N. Hasegawa et al., “Enhancement of periodontal tissue regeneration by transplantation of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells,” Journal of Periodontology, vol. 75, no. 9, pp. 1281–1287, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. M. F. Pittenger, A. M. Mackay, S. C. Beck et al., “Multilineage potential of adult human mesenchymal stem cells,” Science, vol. 284, no. 5411, pp. 143–147, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. N. Hasegawa, H. Kawaguchi, A. Hirachi et al., “Behavior of transplanted bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells in periodontal defects,” Journal of Periodontology, vol. 77, no. 6, pp. 1003–1007, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. Y. Yamada, M. Ueda, H. Hibi, and S. Baba, “A novel approach to periodontal tissue regeneration with mesenchymal stem cells and platelet-rich plasma using tissue engineering technology: a clinical case report,” International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 363–369, 2006. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. K. Washio, T. Iwata, M. Mizutani et al., “Assessment of cell sheets derived from human periodontal ligament cells: a pre-clinical study,” Cell and Tissue Research, pp. 1–8, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. D. A. De Ugarte, P. H. Ashjian, A. Elbarbary, and M. H. Hedrick, “Future of fat as raw material for tissue regeneration,” Annals of Plastic Surgery, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 215–219, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. B. T. Mischen, K. E. Follmar, K. E. Moyer et al., “Metabolic and functional characterization of human adipose-derived stem cells in tissue engineering?” Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, vol. 122, no. 3, pp. 725–738, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. Y. Zhu, T. Liu, K. Song, X. Fan, X. Ma, and Z. Cui, “Adipose-derived stem cell: a better stem cell than BMSC,” Cell Biochemistry and Function, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 664–675, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. P. A. Zuk, M. Zhu, H. Mizuno et al., “Multilineage cells from human adipose tissue: implications for cell-based therapies,” Tissue Engineering, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 211–228, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. T. Hashikawa, “Periodontal regeneration by transplantation of adipose tissue-derived stem cells,” in Proceedings of the 8th Asian Pacific Society of Periodontology Meeting, p. 168, 2009.
  31. S. Murakami, “Periodontal tissue regeneration by signaling molecule(s): what role does basic fibroblast growth factor (FGF-2) have in periodontal therapy?” Periodontology 2000, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 188–208, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  32. M. Tobita, A. C. Uysal, R. Ogawa, H. Hyakusoku, and H. Mizuno, “Periodontal tissue regeneration with adipose-derived stem cells,” Tissue Engineering, Part A, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 945–953, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. K. Yamada, J. Yamaura, M. Katoh, K. I. Hata, K. Okuda, and H. Yoshie, “Fabrication of cultured oral gingiva by tissue engineering techniques without materials of animal origin,” Journal of Periodontology, vol. 77, no. 4, pp. 672–677, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. M. Murata, K. Okuda, M. Momose et al., “Root coverage with cultured gingival dermal substitute composed of gingival fibroblasts and matrix: a case series,” International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 461–467, 2008. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. S. Tada, T. Era, C. Furusawa et al., “Characterization of mesendoderm: a diverging point of the definitive endoderm and mesoderm in embryonic stem cell differentiation culture,” Development, vol. 132, no. 19, pp. 4363–4374, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. X. Duan, Q. Tu, J. Zhang et al., “Application of induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells in periodontal tissue regeneration,” Journal of Cellular Physiology, vol. 226, no. 1, pp. 150–157, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. Y. Kuroda, M. Kitada, S. Wakao et al., “Unique multipotent cells in adult human mesenchymal cell populations,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 107, no. 19, pp. 8639–8643, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. H. Obokata, K. Kojima, K. Westerman et al., “The potential of stem cells in adult tissues representative of the three germ layers,” Tissue engineering, Part A, vol. 17, no. 5-6, pp. 607–615, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  39. A. I. Caplan, “Mesenchymal stem cells,” Journal of Orthopaedic Research, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 641–650, 1991. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. A. J. Friedenstein, U. F. Gorskaja, and N. N. Kulagina, “Fibroblast precursors in normal and irradiated mouse hematopoietic organs,” Experimental Hematology, vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 267–274, 1976. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. A. I. Caplan and D. Correa, “The MSC: an injury drugstore,” Cell Stem Cell, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 11–15, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  42. S. Gronthos, M. Mankani, J. Brahim, P. G. Robey, and S. Shi, “Postnatal human dental pulp stem cells (DPSCs) in vitro and in vivo,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 97, no. 25, pp. 13625–13630, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. T. Iwata, M. Yamato, Z. Zhang et al., “Validation of human periodontal ligament-derived cells as a reliable source for cytotherapeutic use,” Journal of Clinical Periodontology, vol. 37, no. 12, pp. 1088–1099, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. M. Crisan, S. Yap, L. Casteilla et al., “A perivascular origin for mesenchymal stem cells in multiple human organs,” Cell Stem Cell, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 301–313, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. J. C. Park, J.-M. Kim, I.-H. Jung et al., “Isolation and characterization of human periodontal ligament (PDL) stem cells (PDLSCs) from the inflamed PDL tissue: in vitro and in vivo evaluations,” Journal of Clinical Periodontology, vol. 38, no. 8, pp. 721–731, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  46. A. Giordano, U. Galderisi, and I. R. Marino, “From the laboratory bench to the patient's bedside: an update on clinical trials with Mesenchymal Stem Cells,” Journal of Cellular Physiology, vol. 211, no. 1, pp. 27–35, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. P. S. Knoepfler, “Deconstructing stem cell tumorigenicity: a roadmap to safe regenerative medicine,” Stem Cells, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 1050–1056, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. J. M. Wilson, “A history lesson for stem cells,” Science, vol. 324, no. 5928, pp. 727–728, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. N. Amariglio, A. Hirshberg, B. W. Scheithauer et al., “Donor-derived brain tumor following neural stem cell transplantation in an ataxia telangiectasia patient,” PLoS Medicine, vol. 6, no. 2, Article ID e1000029, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. “Clinical trials of regeneration for periodontal tissue,” 2009,
  51. C. A. Herberts, M. S. Kwa, and H.P Hermsen, “Risk factors in the development of stem cell therapy,” Journal of Translational Medicine, vol. 9, p. 29, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  52. “FDA regulations relating to good clinical practice and clinical trials,”
  53. “Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) guidelines/inspection checklist,”
  54. M. Henderson, “Patients warned over dangers of untested stem-cell wonder cures,” The Times.
  55. “Danger, stem cell tourists: patient in Thailand dies from treatment,”
  56. K. Kelland, “Health experts warn of “stem cell tourism” dangers,” 2010, View at Google Scholar
  57. “Stem-cell society condemns medical tourism,” Nature, vol. 453, p. 969, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  58. D. Cyranoski, “Strange lesions after stem-cell therapy,” Nature, vol. 465, no. 7301, p. 997, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  59. D. Cyranoski, “Korean deaths spark inquiry,” Nature, vol. 468, no. 7323, p. 485, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  60. H. Ledford, “Stem-cell scientists grapple with clinics,” Nature, vol. 474, no. 7353, p. 550, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  61. D. Thirabanjasak, K. Tantiwongse, and P. S. Thorner, “Angiomyeloproliferative lesions following autologous stem cell therapy,” Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, vol. 21, no. 7, pp. 1218–1222, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  62. M. G. Flores, M. Hasegawa, M. Yamato, R. Takagi, T. Okano, and I. Ishikawa, “Cementum-periodontal ligament complex regeneration using the cell sheet technique,” Journal of Periodontal Research, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 364–371, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  63. I. E. Hannachi, M. Yamato, and T. Okano, “Cell sheet technology and cell patterning for biofabrication,” Biofabrication, vol. 1, no. 2, Article ID 022002, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  64. D. Rubio, J. Garcia-Castro, M. C. Martín et al., “Spontaneous human adult stem cell transformation,” Cancer Research, vol. 65, no. 8, pp. 3035–3039, 2005. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  65. E. L. Spaeth, J. L. Dembinski, A. K. Sasser et al., “Mesenchymal stem cell transition to tumor-associated fibroblasts contributes to fibrovascular network expansion and tumor progression,” PLoS One, vol. 4, no. 4, Article ID e4992, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  66. T. Nozaki, M. Yamato, T. Inuma, K. Nishida, and T. Okano, “Transportation of transplantable cell sheets fabricated with temperature-responsive culture surfaces for regenerative medicine,” Journal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 190–195, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus