Antifibrotic Activity of Acylated and Unacylated Ghrelin

Angelino, Elia; Reano, Simone; Ferrara, Michele; Agosti, Emanuela; Graziani, Andrea; Filigheddu, Nicoletta

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/385682

International Journal of Endocrinology

On this page

Abstract Introduction Conclusions Abbreviations Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2015 | Article ID 385682 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/385682

Antifibrotic Activity of Acylated and Unacylated Ghrelin

Elia Angelino,¹Simone Reano,¹Michele Ferrara,¹Emanuela Agosti,¹Andrea Graziani,¹and Nicoletta Filigheddu¹

Academic Editor: Ludwik K. Malendowicz

Received16 Dec 2014

Accepted01 Apr 2015

Published16 Apr 2015

Abstract

Fibrosis can affect almost all tissues and organs, it often represents the terminal stage of chronic diseases, and it is regarded as a major health issue for which efficient therapies are needed. Tissue injury, by inducing necrosis/apoptosis, triggers inflammatory response that, in turn, promotes fibroblast activation and pathological deposition of extracellular matrix. Acylated and unacylated ghrelin are the main products of the ghrelin gene. The acylated form, through its receptor GHSR-1a, stimulates appetite and growth hormone (GH) release. Although unacylated ghrelin does not bind or activate GHSR-1a, it shares with the acylated form several biological activities. Ghrelin peptides exhibit anti-inflammatory, antioxidative, and antiapoptotic activities, suggesting that they might represent an efficient approach to prevent or reduce fibrosis. The aim of this review is to summarize the available evidence regarding the effects of acylated and unacylated ghrelin on different pathologies and experimental models in which fibrosis is a predominant characteristic.

1. Introduction

Repair of damaged tissues is a complex physiological process that results in the deposition of extracellular matrix (ECM) components by resident fibroblasts [1]. Although the deposition of ECM proteins is normally a transient event, repeated tissue injuries in chronic pathologies or dysregulation of this process can lead to fibrosis and, eventually, to organ dysfunction [2]. Fibrosis can affect almost all tissues and organs, including heart, liver, kidney, lungs, and skin, therefore representing a major health issue for which efficient therapies are needed.

Regardless of the specific fibrotic disease and organs affected, the mechanisms involved in the progression of this pathology are very similar. Indeed, damaged tissue repair can be recapitulated in four overlapping phases, hemostasis, inflammation, proliferation, and remodeling in which several cell types, closely interconnected to each other, play an important role [3]. During the phases of hemostasis and inflammation, platelets secrete cytokines, including platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) and transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) that, in turn, recruit macrophages, neutrophils, and natural-killer cells to the site of injury. These cells, besides removing dead cells, debris, and pathogens, release cytokines that trigger activation and proliferation of resident fibroblasts, thus affecting ECM production [4]. For example, macrophages release TGF-β1 that controls a wide spectrum of activities, such as promoting fibroblast differentiation into active myofibroblasts, inducing ECM protein expression [5, 6], and repressing the expression of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), key proteins able to degrade several ECM components [7]. In addition, macrophages release tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and interleukin-1β (IL-1β) that promote fibroblast activation and fibrotic tissue deposition [2]. Tissue damage and inflammation increase reactive oxygen species (ROS) production, which, in turn, contributes to fibrosis, enhancing the secretion of fibrogenic factors [8].

Acylated and unacylated ghrelin are circulating peptide hormones encoded by the ghrelin gene which are mainly released from the stomach during fasting [9]. The 117-amino acid preproghrelin undergoes proteolytic cleavages leading to the mature ghrelin peptides and to another biological active peptide named obestatin [10]. The acylated form, through high affinity binding to the growth hormone secretagogue receptor type 1a (GHSR-1a), induces GH release and promotes food intake, adiposity, and positive energy balance [11–13]. Alongside its role in feeding and energy homeostasis, ghrelin exerts also many other biological activities, including cardioprotection and enhancement of cardiac function [14], a strong anti-inflammatory activity [15], antioxidant activity on several cell types and tissues such as liver, heart, and lung [16–19], and neuroprotective activities [20]. The acylated ghrelin anti-inflammatory function mainly depends on its direct effect on T lymphocytes and monocytes, in which it inhibits the expression of proinflammatory cytokines such as IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α [21].

Acylation of ghrelin is essential for its binding to GHSR-1a, since the unacylated form does not activate this receptor, unless administered at very high concentrations, in which case it acts as a functional agonist [22–25]. However, both acylated and unacylated ghrelin share high affinity binding sites in a number of cell lines and tissues, where they mediate several activities, such as protection from apoptosis and oxidative injury [26–32], stimulation of cell differentiation [33–36], induction of proliferation [30, 37–39], and protection of skeletal muscles from wasting [40–42]. These effects suggest the presence of a not yet identified common receptor of both acylated and unacylated ghrelin. In addition, some biological activities are elicited only by the unacylated but not the acylated form of ghrelin, suggesting the existence of a specific receptor for unacylated ghrelin [39, 43–45].

Circulating levels of acylated and unacylated ghrelin are often altered in pathological states associated with fibrosis and this suggests a role for these hormones in tissue homeostasis and/or in etiology of these conditions ([46–52], Table 1).

2. Acylated and Unacylated Ghrelin as Antifibrotic Factors

2.1. Heart

The massive deposition of collagen in the heart that occurs upon several stimuli, such as cardiomyocyte death, inflammation, hypertension-induced enhanced workload, hypertrophy, or chemotherapy with doxorubicin, plays a crucial role in cardiac remodeling after heart injury and may contribute to ventricular arrhythmias, left ventricular dysfunction, heart failure, and sudden cardiac death [53].

Together with inflammation, cardiac fibroblasts, the most abundant cells in the heart, are the main players in cardiac remodeling: upon injury they undergo proliferation and synthesize collagen to replace the necrotic or apoptotic cardiomyocytes [53].

Due to the antiapoptotic and anti-inflammatory activity of ghrelin, several researchers investigated the antifibrotic effect of acylated and unacylated ghrelin in different models of cardiac injury. Doxorubicin, an antibiotic used in chemotherapy, alters cardiomyocytes energy metabolism and induces their apoptosis, thus determining myocardial fibrosis, which eventually results in cardiomyopathy and congestive heart failure [54]. Accordingly with the in vitro data on the cardioprotective effect of acylated and unacylated ghrelin against doxorubicin-induced apoptosis of cardiomyocytes [26], it has been recently demonstrated that both peptides are effective in inhibiting the cardiotoxicity of this drug also in vivo [55, 56]. Unacylated ghrelin displays antiapoptotic effects on cardiomyocytes through the activation of the prosurvival ERK1/2 and PI3K/Akt signaling pathways ([26, 55], Figure 1). Acylated ghrelin seems to play an important role in the regulation of autophagy, a cellular pathway involved in protein and organelle degradation. Although this cellular pathway is normally a protective mechanism, excessive autophagy can destroy essential cellular components and eventually induce apoptosis [57]. Doxorubicin treatment induces oxidative stress, autophagy, apoptosis, and, finally, cardiac dysfunction and collagen deposition in the heart [56, 57]. In this experimental model of cardiac injury, acylated ghrelin inhibits ROS-induced autophagy and cardiomyocyte death through the inhibition of AMPK and activation of p38-MAPK pathway ([56], Figure 1), thus leading to a decrease of doxorubicin-induced fibrosis and cardiac dysfunction. The antifibrotic effects of acylated and unacylated ghrelin have been demonstrated in other experimental models of cardiac injury, such as isoproterenol administration, myocardial infarction (MI), and spontaneous or diabetes-associated hypertension [58–62]. The subacute injection in rats of the β-adrenergic agonist isoproterenol induces myocardial injury and fibrosis and increases myocardial ghrelin expression and plasmatic acylated ghrelin levels [58, 59]. In this model, acylated ghrelin treatment ameliorates myocardial function and reduces fibrosis, although the mechanisms of such a protection have not been elucidated [59]. The unacylated form of the peptide displays similar effects, suggesting that the antifibrotic activity of ghrelin is mediated by both GHSR-dependent and GHSR-independent pathways [59].

Ghrelin has a positive effect on cardiac remodeling and cardiac function also in rats undergoing MI by coronary artery ligation. MI induces a strong increase in tissutal IL-1β and TNF-α that is inhibited by the chronic administration of ghrelin [60]. Ghrelin also blunts the induction of MMP-2 and MMP-9 that could be viewed as an inhibition of overall fibroblasts activity [60]. However, in spontaneously hypertensive rats, the synthetic GH-secretagogue hexarelin prevents cardiac fibrosis by inducing, rather than by inhibiting, MMP-2 and MMP-9 activity [61]. Notably, unacylated ghrelin, despite reducing cardiac fibrosis in diabetic mice, has no effect on other MMPs involved in cardiac fibrosis development such as MMP-8 and MMP-13 [62]. The effect of unacylated ghrelin treatment was in fact investigated also in db/db diabetic mice compared to nondiabetic mice [62], since cardiac fibrosis is also observed in diabetic patients without hypertension [63]. In this model of diabetic mice, unacylated ghrelin impairs collagen accumulation by upregulating adiponectin cardiac expression [62], which is known to prevent myocardial hypertrophy and fibrosis [64, 65].

2.2. Liver

In liver, hepatitis C or B viral infections, autoimmune diseases, alcohol abuse, and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) can progress to a severe fibrotic disease in which parenchymal tissue is replaced by nonfunctional fibrotic tissue, a condition defined as cirrhosis [66]. Removal of the causative agent, such as viral infections, could revert liver fibrosis, but in the case of autoimmune diseases and NAFLD the causative agent is not clearly defined and the identification of new agents that could modulate this process is of pivotal importance [67].

In patients with alcoholic hepatitis and chronic hepatitis C, plasmatic ghrelin levels are lower than in healthy subjects and negatively correlate with the severity of fibrosis ([48], Table 1). Circulating ghrelin levels also correlate with other hepatic fibrotic diseases; however, in the case of patients with NAFLD, a worsening of the fibrotic stage is associated with high plasmatic concentration of both acylated and unacylated ghrelin ([50], Table 1). Interestingly, a screening of miRNAs expression in visceral adipose tissue of NAFLD patients revealed that miR-132, of which the ghrelin gene is a predicted target, is downregulated in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) compared to non-NASH patients [68], although a biological validation of this relationship still needs to be performed.

Although the causative relationship between ghrelin circulating levels and NAFLD is not defined, ghrelin might have a therapeutic potential in this and other hepatic pathologies, as demonstrated in several experimental models. The most used models to induce hepatic fibrosis include CCl₄ or thioacetamide (TAA) administration to rodents, which lead to oxidative stress-mediated liver cirrhosis [69]. Another model to induce liver fibrosis consists in bile duct ligation (BDL), which causes accumulation of hydrophobic bile acids in the liver, leading to ROS formation, oxidative damage, inflammatory cell accumulation, and the increase of serum proinflammatory cytokines [70]. In addition, NAFLD may be reproduced in rats by feeding animals with a high-fat diet, thus inducing liver fat accumulation, inflammation, and cellular necrosis [71]. In this model, ghrelin treatment blunts the induction of TNF-α and IL-6 expression, counteracts hepatic oxidative stress, and inhibits hepatic cell apoptosis [72]. The beneficial effects of ghrelin on liver injury and fibrosis have been pointed out by other studies as well. Indeed, in rats with chronic hepatic fibrosis caused by BDL, ghrelin administration prevents hepatic damage by blunting the BDL-induced increase of TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6 plasma levels [73]. Moreover, ghrelin treatment impairs neutrophil infiltration and diminishes the amount of myofibroblast accumulation in the injured liver [48, 73]. Accordingly, ghrelin downregulates the expression of collagen-α1 and TGF-β1 in primary hepatic stellate cells (HSC), the main hepatic fibrogenic cells [48], resulting in a diminished collagen deposition [48, 73]. Ghrelin features anti-inflammatory and antifibrotic effects also in TAA-induced hepatic injury in rats where it attenuates liver injury and collagen deposition through inhibition of hepatic cell apoptosis and antioxidative activity, in a way partially mediated by the induction of nitric oxide (NO) [49].

Finally, the physiological role of the ghrelin gene in the establishment of liver fibrosis was investigated exploiting ghrelin knock-out mice that display much more severe CCl₄-induced liver injury and fibrosis compared to wild type animals, suggesting that endogenous ghrelin is required for a proper response to liver damage [48].

2.3. Kidneys

Ghrelin is expressed in kidneys and its expression is altered in pathological conditions such as glomerulopathies, in particular in the proliferative form, in which the immunoexpression of ghrelin is abated [74]. Moreover, the expression of ghrelin negatively correlates with the profibrotic protein endothelin-1 and interstitial inflammatory cell infiltration, suggesting that the loss of ghrelin could contribute to the development of renal interstitial fibrosis, which is the common feature of different end-stage renal diseases [74].

The renin-angiotensin system (RAS) is a well-known regulator of blood pressure and contributes to the development of target organ damage due to hypertension. Angiotensin-II (AngII) is the main mediator of RAS-induced chronic kidney damage through multiple mechanisms, including promotion of inflammation, fibrosis, oxidative stress, and senescence [75]. Indeed, in the experimental model of chronic kidney disease induced by AngII infusion, the kidneys display increased ROS and an accelerated tissue senescence [76, 77]. In addition, treated mice express higher levels of TGF-β and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) than saline-infused animals [78]. In this model, ghrelin impairs renal tubular damage, fibrosis development, and senescence by both reducing the oxidative stress and maintaining the redox state. This is mediated by the induction of UCP2 and PGC1α that affect ROS production and mitochondriogenesis, respectively ([78], Figure 1).

The antifibrogenic activity of ghrelin was demonstrated also in a rat model of renal damage obtained by unilateral ureteral obstruction (UUO), which results in tubular injury and cell death, with interstitial macrophage infiltration [79]. In this model, ghrelin protects renal tubular cells from apoptosis, impairs macrophage infiltration, and reduces the induction of the proinflammatory cytokines IL-1β, TNF-α, and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) [80]. Moreover, this work demonstrates that ghrelin attenuates renal fibrosis by inhibiting fibroblast differentiation and by blocking epithelial mesenchymal transition (EMT), thus stabilizing the epithelial phenotype [80]. The mechanisms through which ghrelin elicits its antifibrotic activity involve the reduction of collagen I/III, fibronectin, and α-SMA expression via inhibition of the TGF-β1/Smad3 signaling pathway [80].

2.4. Lungs

Lung fibrosis occurs as a consequence of acute lung injury leading to persistent respiratory failure. Lung fibrosis is usually differentiated into distinct types, including diffuse fibrosing alveolitis, diffuse interstitial fibrosis, and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, which is considered the most common and severe form of pulmonary fibrosis [81]. Currently, there are no therapies to counteract acute lung injury progression and lung transplantation remains the only possible intervention in end-stage disease [81].

Acute lung injury is characterized by the damage of the alveolar capillary barrier, neutrophil accumulation, and the induction of proinflammatory cytokines, followed by devastating lung fibrosis [82, 83]. In particular, the exfoliation of alveolar epithelial cells from alveolar septa leads to the activation of fibroblasts and the subsequent massive ECM deposition [82].

Cecal ligation and puncture (CLP), the most used technique to induce peritonitis and sepsis, also induces lung injury and fibrosis as direct consequence of hypoxemia, neutrophilic inflammation, and alveolar edema [83].

In CLP-treated rats, ghrelin attenuates acute lung injury and mortality through inhibition of nuclear factor- (NF-) B activity ([84], Figure 1). NF-B is a transcription factor that regulates gene expression of several cytokines, including TNF-α, IL-6, IL-1, and IL-8 [85]. Accordingly, treatment with ghrelin reduces pulmonary levels of TNF-α and IL-6 in CLP-treated rats [84].

Another experimental model used to induce acute lung injury in rodents is the intratracheal injection of bleomycin that promotes massive cell death, neutrophil and lymphocyte infiltration, cytokine production, and fibrosis [83, 86]. In bleomycin-treated mice, ghrelin administration improves animal survival in a dose-dependent manner and maintains lung architecture by reducing fibrosis [86]. This antifibrotic activity is due to the impairment of neutrophil infiltration and accumulation in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid and through the inhibition of proinflammatory cytokines and of IGF-1 release, which promotes collagen production by fibroblasts [86]. In addition, the inhibition of alveolar epithelial cell death, observed in ghrelin-treated mice, represents another mechanism that contributes to ghrelin antifibrotic effects, since the prevention of the denudation of alveolar membranes impairs the subsequent fibrosis establishment [86].

In the same model of lung fibrosis, the traditional Japanese herbal medicine rikkunshito, known to stimulate a strong secretion of ghrelin, reduces lung fibrosis and ameliorates the systemic cachectic condition [87]. However, rikkunshito effects are only partially due to the associated ghrelin increase, since it maintains its protective effects also in mice devoid of the ghrelin gene [88].

2.5. Systemic Sclerosis

Systemic sclerosis, or scleroderma, is an autoimmune chronic connective tissue disease characterized by extensive fibrosis of the skin and internal organs, including lungs, gastrointestinal tract, kidneys, and heart [52]. Plasmatic levels of acylated and unacylated ghrelin are lower in systemic sclerosis patients than in healthy controls and even lower in patients with interstitial lung disease, suggesting that acylated ghrelin levels inversely correlate with tissue fibrosis ([52], Table 1). Consistently, acylated ghrelin treatment of fibroblasts isolated from systemic sclerosis patients reduces TGF-β1 expression and collagen production [52].

Skin scleroderma might be experimentally induced in mice by subcutaneous injections of bleomycin that result in increased dermal thickness, a higher number of α-SMA-positive myofibroblasts, and greater infiltration of inflammatory cells. All these effects are prevented by both acylated and unacylated ghrelin [89]. Taken together, these data suggest that restoring normal circulating acylated and unacylated levels might efficiently contrast the fibrosis induced by systemic sclerosis.

3. Conclusions

Fibrosis is an intrinsic response to chronic injury, maintaining organ integrity when extensive necrosis or apoptosis occurs. With protracted damage, fibrosis can progress towards excessive scarring and organ failure. To date, no satisfactory treatments are available. Anti-inflammation strategies are one of the possible therapeutic approaches to fibrosis. Acylated ghrelin has a potent anti-inflammatory activity and its ability to inhibit proinflammatory cytokines expression and release has been demonstrated by a large number of studies, both in vitro and in vivo [15]. Most of the studies on the antifibrotic effects of acylated and unacylated ghrelin agree that the mechanism of action includes the reduction of inflammation. However, also their effect on oxidative stress reduction plays a crucial role in repressing the formation of fibrosis, and their broad antiapoptotic activity surely contributes in maintaining organ structure and function. This has, however, raised a doubt that if they inhibit apoptosis also in myofibroblasts, this could help, instead of hinder, fibrosis [67].

Circulating levels of ghrelin are often altered in pathologies characterized by the presence of fibrosis; however, it is difficult to discern a causative effect between ghrelin levels and fibrosis, as it is plausible that alterations in ghrelin levels reflect body mass and/or body energy metabolism. This is particularly possible in pathologies co-occurring with cachexia, such as heart and renal failure, in which the increase of ghrelin may represent a compensatory mechanism of the organism in the attempt at re-establishing optimal energetic balance or the establishment of ghrelin resistance [42]. However, in pathologies such as scleroderma, in which fibrosis affects the gastrointestinal tract, it cannot be excluded that the altered levels of ghrelin are a direct consequence of the altered gut condition.

Based on the studies reviewed herein, ghrelin, both in its acylated and unacylated forms, acts at least at two different levels. On one side, ghrelin peptides reduce the infiltration of inflammatory cells in the injured tissue and the subsequent release of cytokines responsible for fibroblast activation. On the other side, they directly affect fibroblast activity by reducing collagen production through the inhibition of TGF-β signaling pathway.

In conclusion, ghrelin peptides and their analogues appear to be promising in the treatment of fibrosis, although their safety and efficacy in long-term use still need to be elucidated.

Abbreviations

AMPK:	Adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase
AngII:	Angiotensin-II
BDL:	Bile duct ligation
CLP:	Cecal ligation and puncture
CTGF:	Connective tissue growth factor
ECM:	Extracellular matrix
EMT:	Epithelial mesenchymal transition
ERK1/2:	Extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2
GH:	Growth hormone
GHSR-1a:	Growth hormone secretagogue receptor type 1a
HSC:	Hepatic stellate cells
IGF-1:	Insulin-like growth factor 1
IL-1β:	Interleukin-1 beta
IL-6:	Interleukin-6
MCP-1:	Monocyte chemoattractant protein-1
MI:	Myocardial infarction
MMPs:	Matrix metalloproteinases
NAFLD:	Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease
NASH:	Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis
NO:	Nitric oxide
PAI-1:	Plasminogen activator inhibitor-1
PDGF:	Platelet-derived growth factor
PGC1α:	Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma coactivator 1-alpha
PI3K:	Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase
RAS:	Renin-angiotensin system
ROS:	Reactive oxygen species
TAA:	Thioacetamide
TGF-β:	Transforming growth factor beta
TNF-α:	Tumor necrosis factor-alpha
UCP2:	Uncoupling protein 2
UUO:	Unilateral ureteral obstruction
α-SMA:	Alpha smooth muscle actin.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that no conflict of interests exists.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Dr. Gillian Walker for her careful English editing. Nicoletta Filigheddu is recipient of a Muscular Dystrophy Association Grant (no. MDA294617).

References

A. Meneghin and C. M. Hogaboam, “Infectious disease, the innate immune response, and fibrosis,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 117, no. 3, pp. 530–538, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. A. Wynn and T. R. Ramalingam, “Mechanisms of fibrosis: therapeutic translation for fibrotic disease,” Nature Medicine, vol. 18, no. 7, pp. 1028–1040, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Guo and L. A. DiPietro, “Factors affecting wound healing,” Journal of Dental Research, vol. 89, no. 3, pp. 219–229, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. J. Koh and L. A. DiPietro, “Inflammation and wound healing: the role of the macrophage,” Expert Reviews in Molecular Medicine, vol. 13, article e23, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. C. Midgley, M. Rogers, M. B. Hallett et al., “Transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1)-stimulated fibroblast to myofibroblast differentiation is mediated by hyaluronan (HA)-facilitated epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and CD44 co-localization in lipid rafts,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 288, no. 21, pp. 14824–14838, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. V. Petrov, R. H. Fagard, and P. J. Lijnen, “Stimulation of collagen production by transforming growth factor-β1 during differentiation of cardiac fibroblasts to myofibroblasts,” Hypertension, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 258–263, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M.-C. Hall, D. A. Young, J. G. Waters et al., “The comparative role of activator protein 1 and Smad factors in the regulation of Timp-1 and MMP-1 gene expression by transforming growth factor-β1,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 278, no. 12, pp. 10304–10313, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Shroff, A. Mamalis, and J. Jagdeo, “Oxidative stress and skin fibrosis,” Current Pathobiology Reports, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 257–267, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Kojima, H. Hosoda, Y. Date, M. Nakazato, H. Matsuo, and K. Kangawa, “Ghrelin is a growth-hormone-releasing acylated peptide from stomach,” Nature, vol. 402, no. 6762, pp. 656–660, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. V. Zhang, P.-G. Ren, O. Avsian-Kretchmer et al., “Obestatin, a peptide encoded by the ghrelin gene, opposes ghrelin's effects on food intake,” Science, vol. 310, no. 5750, pp. 996–999, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Tschöp, D. L. Smiley, and M. L. Heiman, “Ghrelin induces adiposity in rodents,” Nature, vol. 407, no. 6806, pp. 908–913, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Ariyasu, K. Takaya, T. Tagami et al., “Stomach is a major source of circulating ghrelin, and feeding state determines plasma ghrelin-like immunoreactivity levels in humans,” Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 86, no. 10, pp. 4753–4758, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. M. Wren, L. J. Seal, M. A. Cohen et al., “Ghrelin enhances appetite and increases food intake in humans,” The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, vol. 86, no. 12, pp. 5992–5995, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Tokudome, I. Kishimoto, M. Miyazato, and K. Kangawa, “Ghrelin and the cardiovascular system,” Frontiers of Hormone Research, vol. 43, pp. 125–133, 2014.
View at: Google Scholar
F. Prodam and N. Filigheddu, “Ghrelin gene products in acute and chronic inflammation,” Archivum Immunologiae et Therapiae Experimentalis, vol. 62, no. 5, pp. 369–384, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Dobutovic, E. Sudar, S. Tepavcevic et al., “Experimental research Effects of ghrelin on protein expression of antioxidative enzymes and iNOS in the rat liver,” Archives of Medical Science, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 806–816, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Barazzoni, A. Semolic, M. R. Cattin, M. Zanetti, and G. Guarnieri, “Acylated ghrelin limits fat accumulation and improves redox state and inflammation markers in the liver of high-fat-fed rats,” Obesity, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 170–177, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X.-X. Tong, D. Wu, X. Wang et al., “Ghrelin protects against cobalt chloride-induced hypoxic injury in cardiac H9c2 cells by inhibiting oxidative stress and inducing autophagy,” Peptides, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 217–227, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Yang, Z. Liu, H. Zhang, and Q. Luo, “Ghrelin protects human pulmonary artery endothelial cells against hypoxia-induced injury via PI3-kinase/Akt,” Peptides, vol. 42, pp. 112–117, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Raimondo, G. Ronchi, S. Geuna et al., “Ghrelin: a novel neuromuscular recovery promoting factor?” International Review of Neurobiology, vol. 108, pp. 207–221, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. D. Dixit, E. M. Schaffer, R. S. Pyle et al., “Ghrelin inhibits leptin- and activation-induced proinflammatory cytokine expression by human monocytes and T cells,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 114, no. 1, pp. 57–66, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. A. Bednarek, S. D. Feighner, S.-S. Pong et al., “Structure—function studies on the new growth hormone-releasing peptide, ghrelin: minimal sequence of ghrelin necessary for activation of growth hormone secretagogue receptor 1a,” Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 43, no. 23, pp. 4370–4376, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Matsumoto, H. Hosoda, Y. Kitajima et al., “Structure-activity relationship of ghrelin: pharmacological study of ghrelin peptides,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 287, no. 1, pp. 142–146, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Gauna, B. van de Zande, A. van Kerkwijk, A. P. N. Themmen, A. J. van der Lely, and P. J. D. Delhanty, “Unacylated ghrelin is not a functional antagonist but a full agonist of the type 1a growth hormone secretagogue receptor (GHS-R),” Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology, vol. 274, no. 1-2, pp. 30–34, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. M. Heppner, C. L. Piechowski, A. Müller et al., “Both acyl and des-acyl ghrelin regulate adiposity and glucose metabolism via central nervous system ghrelin receptors,” Diabetes, vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 122–131, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Baldanzi, N. Filigheddu, S. Cutrupi et al., “Ghrelin and des-acyl ghrelin inhibit cell death in cardiomyocytes and endothelial cells through ERK1/2 and PI 3-kinase/AKT,” Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 159, no. 6, pp. 1029–1037, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Shimada, H. Furuta, A. Doi et al., “Des-acyl ghrelin protects microvascular endothelial cells from oxidative stress-induced apoptosis through sirtuin 1 signaling pathway,” Metabolism: Clinical and Experimental, vol. 63, no. 4, pp. 469–474, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Granata, F. Settanni, L. Trovato et al., “Unacylated as well as acylated ghrelin promotes cell survival and inhibit apoptosis in HIT-T15 pancretic β-cells,” Journal of Endocrinological Investigation, vol. 29, no. 9, pp. RC19–RC22, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Chung, S. Seo, M. Moon, and S. Park, “Phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase/Akt/glycogen synthase kinase-3 beta and ERK1/2 pathways mediate protective effects of acylated and unacylated ghrelin against oxygen-glucose deprivation-induced apoptosis in primary rat cortical neuronal cells,” Journal of Endocrinology, vol. 198, no. 3, pp. 511–521, 2008.
View at: Google Scholar
P. J. D. Delhanty, P. M. van Koetsveld, C. Gauna et al., “Ghrelin and its unacylated isoform stimulate the growth of adrenocortical tumor cells via an anti-apoptotic pathway,” American Journal of Physiology—Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 293, no. 1, pp. E302–E309, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. P. Yu, X. M. Pei, T. K. Sin et al., “Acylated and unacylated ghrelin inhibit doxorubicin-induced apoptosis in skeletal muscle,” Acta Physiologica, vol. 211, no. 1, pp. 201–213, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Dieci, L. Casati, F. Pagani, F. Celotti, and V. Sibilia, “Acylated and unacylated ghrelin protect MC3T3-E1 cells against tert-butyl hydroperoxide-induced oxidative injury: pharmacological characterization of ghrelin receptor and possible epigenetic involvement,” Amino Acids, vol. 46, no. 7, pp. 1715–1725, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Filigheddu, V. F. Gnocchi, M. Coscia et al., “Ghrelin and des-acyl ghrelin promote differentiation and fusion of C2C12 skeletal muscle cells,” Molecular Biology of the Cell, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 986–994, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Giovambattista, R. C. Gaillard, and E. Spinedi, “Ghrelin gene-related peptides modulate rat white adiposity,” Vitamins and Hormones, vol. 77, pp. 171–205, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Miegueu, D. St Pierre, F. Broglio, and K. Cianflone, “Effect of desacyl ghrelin, obestatin and related peptides on triglyceride storage, metabolism and GHSR signaling in 3T3-L1 adipocytes,” Journal of Cellular Biochemistry, vol. 112, no. 2, pp. 704–714, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Gao, J. Yang, R. Wei et al., “Ghrelin induces cardiac lineage differentiation of human embryonic stem cells through ERK1/2 pathway,” International Journal of Cardiology, vol. 167, no. 6, pp. 2724–2733, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. J. Delhanty, B. C. van der Eerden, M. van der Velde et al., “Ghrelin and unacylated ghrelin stimulate human osteoblast growth via mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK)/phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) pathways in the absence of GHS-R1a,” Journal of Endocrinology, vol. 188, no. 1, pp. 37–47, 2006.
View at: Google Scholar
R. Granata, F. Settanni, L. Biancone et al., “Acylated and unacylated ghrelin promote proliferation and inhibit apoptosis of pancreatic β-cells and human islets: Involvement of 3′,5′-cyclic adenosine monophosphate/protein kinase A, extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2, and phosphatidyl inositol 3-kinase/Akt signaling,” Endocrinology, vol. 148, no. 2, pp. 512–529, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Togliatto, A. Trombetta, P. Dentelli et al., “Unacylated ghrelin promotes skeletal muscle regeneration following hindlimb ischemia via SOD-2-mediated miR-221/222 expression,” Journal of the American Heart Association, vol. 2, no. 6, Article ID e000376, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Sheriff, N. Kadeer, R. Joshi, L. A. Friend, J. H. James, and A. Balasubramaniam, “Des-acyl ghrelin exhibits pro-anabolic and anti-catabolic effects on C2C12 myotubes exposed to cytokines and reduces burn-induced muscle proteolysis in rats,” Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology, vol. 351, no. 2, pp. 286–295, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. E. Porporato, N. Filigheddu, S. Reano et al., “Acylated and unacylated ghrelin impair skeletal muscle atrophy in mice,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 123, no. 2, pp. 611–622, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Reano, A. Graziani, and N. Filigheddu, “Acylated and unacylated ghrelin administration to blunt muscle wasting,” Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition and Metabolic Care, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 236–240, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Gauna, P. J. D. Delhanty, L. J. Hofland et al., “Ghrelin stimulates, whereas des-octanoyl ghrelin inhibits, glucose output by primary hepatocytes,” Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 90, no. 2, pp. 1055–1060, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Togliatto, A. Trombetta, P. Dentelli et al., “Unacylated ghrelin rescues endothelial progenitor cell function in individuals with type 2 diabetes,” Diabetes, vol. 59, no. 4, pp. 1016–1025, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Benso, D. H. St-Pierre, F. Prodam et al., “Metabolic effects of overnight continuous infusion of unacylated ghrelin in humans,” European Journal of Endocrinology, vol. 166, no. 5, pp. 911–916, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Nagaya, M. Uematsu, M. Kojima et al., “Elevated circulating level of ghrelin in cachexia associated with chronic heart failure: relationships between ghrelin and anabolic/catabolic factors,” Circulation, vol. 104, no. 17, pp. 2034–2038, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Chen, X.-W. Ji, A.-Y. Zhang, J.-C. Lv, J.-G. Zhang, and C.-H. Zhao, “Prognostic value of plasma ghrelin in predicting the outcome of patients with chronic heart failure,” Archives of Medical Research, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 263–269, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Moreno, J. F. Chaves, P. Sancho-Bru et al., “Ghrelin attenuates hepatocellular injury and liver fibrogenesis in rodents and influences fibrosis progression in humans,” Hepatology, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 974–985, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. N. Kabil, H. A. Seddiek, N. A. Yassin, and M. M. Gamal-Eldin, “Effect of ghrelin on chronic liver injury and fibrogenesis in male rats: possible role of nitric oxide,” Peptides, vol. 52, pp. 90–97, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Estep, M. Abawi, M. Jarrar et al., “Association of obestatin, ghrelin, and inflammatory cytokines in obese patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease,” Obesity Surgery, vol. 21, no. 11, pp. 1750–1757, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Itoh, N. Nagaya, M. Yoshikawa et al., “Elevated plasma ghrelin level in underweight patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease,” American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, vol. 170, no. 8, pp. 879–882, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Ota, Y. Kawaguchi, K. Takagi et al., “Ghrelin attenuates collagen production in lesional fibroblasts from patients with systemic sclerosis,” Clinical Immunology, vol. 147, no. 2, pp. 71–78, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Fan, A. Takawale, J. Lee, and Z. Kassiri, “Cardiac fibroblasts, fibrosis and extracellular matrix remodeling in heart disease,” Fibrogenesis and Tissue Repair, vol. 5, no. 1, article 15, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Octavia, C. G. Tocchetti, K. L. Gabrielson, S. Janssens, H. J. Crijns, and A. L. Moens, “Doxorubicin-induced cardiomyopathy: from molecular mechanisms to therapeutic strategies,” Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology, vol. 52, no. 6, pp. 1213–1225, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. M. Pei, B. Y. Yung, S. P. Yip, M. Ying, I. F. Benzie, and P. M. Siu, “Desacyl ghrelin prevents doxorubicin-induced myocardial fibrosis and apoptosis via the GHSR-independent pathway,” The American Journal of Physiology—Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 306, no. 3, pp. E311–E323, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Wang, X.-L. Wang, H.-L. Chen et al., “Ghrelin inhibits doxorubicin cardiotoxicity by inhibiting excessive autophagy through AMPK and p38-MAPK,” Biochemical Pharmacology, vol. 88, no. 3, pp. 334–350, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y.-W. Zhang, J. Shi, Y.-J. Li, and L. Wei, “Cardiomyocyte death in doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity,” Archivum Immunologiae et Therapiae Experimentalis, vol. 57, no. 6, pp. 435–445, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Nichtova, M. Novotova, E. Kralova, and T. Stankovicova, “Morphological and functional characteristics of models of experimental myocardial injury induced by isoproterenol,” General Physiology and Biophysics, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 141–151, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Li, L.-K. Zhang, Y.-Z. Pang et al., “Cardioprotective effects of ghrelin and des-octanoyl ghrelin on myocardial injury induced by isoproterenol in rats,” Acta Pharmacologica Sinica, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 527–535, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. X. Huang, M. J. Yuan, H. Huang et al., “Ghrelin inhibits post-infarct myocardial remodeling and improves cardiac function through anti-inflammation effect,” Peptides, vol. 30, no. 12, pp. 2286–2291, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Xu, F. Ding, J. Pang et al., “Chronic administration of hexarelin attenuates cardiac fibrosis in the spontaneously hypertensive rat,” American Journal of Physiology—Heart and Circulatory Physiology, vol. 303, no. 6, pp. H703–H711, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. M. Pei, B. Y. Yung, S. P. Yip et al., “Protective effects of desacyl ghrelin on diabetic cardiomyopathy,” Acta Diabetologica, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 293–306, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Voulgari, D. Papadogiannis, and N. Tentolouris, “Diabetic cardiomyopathy: From the pathophysiology of the cardiac myocytes to current diagnosis and management strategies,” Vascular Health and Risk Management, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 883–903, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. E. Essick, N. Ouchi, R. M. Wilson et al., “Adiponectin mediates cardioprotection in oxidative stress-induced cardiac myocyte remodeling,” The American Journal of Physiology—Heart and Circulatory Physiology, vol. 301, no. 3, pp. H984–H993, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Shibata, N. Ouchi, M. Ito et al., “Adiponectin-mediated modulation of hypertrophic signals in the heart,” Nature Medicine, vol. 10, no. 12, pp. 1384–1389, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Schuppan and Y. O. Kim, “Evolving therapies for liver fibrosis,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 123, no. 5, pp. 1887–1901, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. L. Friedman, D. Sheppard, J. S. Duffield, and S. Violette, “Therapy for fibrotic diseases: nearing the starting line,” Science Translational Medicine, vol. 5, no. 167, Article ID 167sr1, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Estep, D. Armistead, N. Hossain et al., “Differential expression of miRNAs in the visceral adipose tissue of patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease,” Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 487–497, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. K. Natarajan, S. Thomas, P. Ramamoorthy et al., “Oxidative stress in the development of liver cirrhosis: a comparison of two different experimental models,” Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 947–957, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Takahashi, Y. Soejima, and T. Fukusato, “Animal models of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease/nonalcoholic steatohepatitis,” World Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 18, no. 19, pp. 2300–2308, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Nakamura and Y. Terauchi, “Lessons from mouse models of high-fat diet-induced NAFLD,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 14, no. 11, pp. 21240–21257, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Li, J. Hai, L. Li et al., “Administration of ghrelin improves inflammation, oxidative stress, and apoptosis during and after non-alcoholic fatty liver disease development,” Endocrine, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 376–386, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Ö. Işeri, G. Şener, B. Saglam, F. Ercan, N. Gedik, and B. Ç. Yeǧen, “Ghrelin alleviates biliary obstruction-induced chronic hepatic injury in rats,” Regulatory Peptides, vol. 146, no. 1–3, pp. 73–79, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Danilewicz and M. Wagrowska-Danilewicz, “Renal immunoexpression of ghrelin is attenuated in human proliferative glomerulopathies,” Nefrologia, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 633–638, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. M. Harrison-Bernard, “The renal renin-angiotensin system,” Advances in Physiology Education, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 270–274, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Benigni, P. Cassis, and G. Remuzzi, “Angiotensin II revisited: new roles in inflammation, immunology and aging,” EMBO Molecular Medicine, vol. 2, no. 7, pp. 247–257, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K.-H. Krause, “Aging: a revisited theory based on free radicals generated by NOX family NADPH oxidases,” Experimental Gerontology, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 256–262, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Fujimura, S. Wakino, H. Minakuchi et al., “Ghrelin protects against renal damages induced by angiotensin-II via an antioxidative stress mechanism in mice,” PLoS ONE, vol. 9, no. 4, Article ID e94373, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. L. Chevalier, M. S. Forbes, and B. A. Thornhill, “Ureteral obstruction as a model of renal interstitial fibrosis and obstructive nephropathy,” Kidney International, vol. 75, no. 11, pp. 1145–1152, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. X. Sun, R. Ding, M. Li et al., “Ghrelin attenuates renal fibrosis and inflammation of obstructive nephropathy,” The Journal of Urology, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Raghu, H. R. Collard, J. J. Egan et al., “An Official ATS/ERS/JRS/ALAT Statement: idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: evidence-based guidelines for diagnosis and management,” The American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, vol. 183, no. 6, pp. 788–824, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. B. Ware and M. A. Matthay, “The acute respiratory distress syndrome,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 342, no. 18, pp. 1334–1349, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Matute-Bello, C. W. Frevert, and T. R. Martin, “Animal models of acute lung injury,” The American Journal of Physiology—Lung Cellular and Molecular Physiology, vol. 295, no. 3, pp. L379–L399, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Wu, W. Dong, M. Zhou et al., “Ghrelin attenuates sepsis-induced acute lung injury and mortality in rats,” The American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, vol. 176, no. 8, pp. 805–813, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. S. Blackwell and J. W. Christman, “The role of nuclear factor- $κ$ B in cytokine gene regulation,” American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 3–9, 1997.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Imazu, S. Yanagi, K. Miyoshi et al., “Ghrelin ameliorates bleomycin-induced acute lung injury by protecting alveolar epithelial cells and suppressing lung inflammation,” European Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 672, no. 1–3, pp. 153–158, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Tsubouchi, S. Yanagi, A. Miura et al., “Rikkunshito ameliorates cachexia associated with bleomycin-induced lung fibrosis in mice by stimulating ghrelin secretion,” Nutrition Research, vol. 34, no. 10, pp. 876–885, 2014.
View at: Google Scholar
H. Tsubouchi, S. Yanagi, A. Miura et al., “Rikkunshito ameliorates bleomycin-induced acute lung injury in a ghrelin-independent manner,” The American Journal of Physiology—Lung Cellular and Molecular Physiology, vol. 306, no. 3, pp. L233–L245, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. S. Koca, M. Ozgen, M. Sarikaya, F. Dagli, B. Ustundag, and A. Isik, “Ghrelin prevents the development of dermal fibrosis in bleomycin-induced scleroderma,” Clinical and Experimental Dermatology, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 176–181, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Aktas, Y. Yilmaz, F. Eren et al., “Serum levels of vaspin, obestatin, and apelin-36 in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease,” Metabolism, vol. 60, no. 4, pp. 544–549, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2015 Elia Angelino et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

1772

Downloads

1271

Citations