Bioactive Compounds from Agricultural Residues, Their Obtaining Techniques, and the Antimicrobial Effect as Postharvest Additives

Gomes-Araújo, Rafael; Martínez-Vázquez, Dolores Gabriela; Charles-Rodríguez, Ana Verónica; Rangel-Ortega, Sarahi; Robledo-Olivo, Armando

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/9936722

International Journal of Food Science

On this page

Abstract Introduction Conclusions Data Availability Conflicts of Interest References Copyright Related Articles

Special Issue

Postharvest Management Approaches for Maintaining Quality of Fresh Horticultural Produce

View this Special Issue

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2021 | Article ID 9936722 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/9936722

Bioactive Compounds from Agricultural Residues, Their Obtaining Techniques, and the Antimicrobial Effect as Postharvest Additives

Rafael Gomes-Araújo,¹Dolores Gabriela Martínez-Vázquez,¹Ana Verónica Charles-Rodríguez,¹Sarahi Rangel-Ortega,¹and Armando Robledo-Olivo¹

Academic Editor: Giuseppe Sortino

Received12 Mar 2021

Revised25 Aug 2021

Accepted02 Sept 2021

Published17 Sept 2021

Abstract

Agricultural vegetable products always seek to meet the growing demands of the population; however, today, there are great losses in supply chains and in the sales stage. Looking for a longer shelf life of fruits and vegetables, postharvest technologies have been developed that allow an adequate transfer from the field to the point of sale and a longer shelf life. One of the most attractive methods to improve quality and nutritional content and extend shelf life of fruits and vegetables is the incorporation of bioactive compounds with postharvest technologies. These compounds are substances that can prevent food spoilage and the proliferation of harmful microorganisms and, in some cases, act as a dietary supplement or provide health benefits. This review presents an updated overview of the knowledge about bioactive compounds derived from plant residues, the techniques most used for obtaining them, their incorporation in edible films and coatings, and the methods of microbial inhibition.

1. Introduction

At present, agricultural problems are based on the adequate food production to satisfy global consumers. However, such production must focus on sustainable processes, thus avoiding generating pollution and waste derived from the agricultural process. It is useless to implement intensive and organic production technologies, if there are postharvest losses within the supply chain during transport, at the sales stage, or during the storage process. Much of the food waste occurs during the postharvest stage, when the product of interest is removed from the soil or separated from the mother plant and its deterioration begins. The routes of products from the countryside to urban areas, complex marketing systems, and the international trade are the main points of attention for the implementation of postharvest techniques, in order to preserve the quality of the products for as long as possible. The plant tissues when exposed to air, accompanied with changes in temperature, solar radiation, and some cuts or blows, begin a process of physiological deterioration. Some crops are even affected at the preharvest stage, where the limitation of nutrients or the impact of some conditions of the crop in its final phase limits the shelf life of the product in its postharvest stage [1].

The global agenda established by the United Nations towards 2030 has determined various objectives for sustainable development. In its objective number 12-Responsible Consumption and Production, it seeks a joint effort among nations to reduce food loss and the generation of food waste. Food losses are quantified from production to the retail level, while food waste comprises the retail and consumption levels [2]. In a study carried out by FAO et al. [2] during 2016, the percentage of food losses by region was analyzed, generating an average global loss of 13.80%, representing losses above 400 billion USD per year.

The significance of postharvest processes does not only lie in the conservation of agricultural products but also in the nutritional quality provided by having food in good condition or even with the addition of beneficial compounds for health. As is well known, fresh fruits and vegetables are a source of vitamins and minerals that can benefit human health. Postharvest deterioration decreases the benevolent capacity of these compounds, in addition to the generation of substances harmful to health.

Due to the importance of the application of postharvest technologies, the obtaining of quality food and enough quantity arises. Postharvest technologies are mainly based on controlling the storage environment or handling conditions, including temperature and humidity. Bioactive compounds are substances that can interfere with cell senescence; the reason why is they have been incorporated into postharvest technologies allowing to extend the shelf life of storage and transport stages. These bioactive compounds are generally found in the same foods or plants from where they are extracted by various techniques [3]. Bioactive compounds mainly exhibit antioxidant and antimicrobial properties [4], which make them attractive for incorporation into minimally processed and horticultural product preservation technologies.

2. Main Bioactive Compounds Present in Plant Waste

The circular economy is a system for the use of resources where the reduction of elements prevails, which applies different mechanisms with the aim of minimizing the generation of waste, thus releasing the economic growth of natural resources. Every year, it is estimated that a third of all food produced is wasted [5], whereof 20.4 million tons is wasted in Mexico [6]. In the fruit and vegetable sector, 45% of the total produced is lost in the production chains (postharvest, processing, and distribution) and consumption [7, 8]. Currently, world postharvest losses of fruits and vegetables caused by microorganisms are of the order of 5 to 25% in developed countries and between 20 and 50% in developing countries. This waste represents the origin of contamination of the soil, air, and water sources, affecting both the environment and public health [9].

In Mexico, the fruit processing industries (lemon, pears, tomato, apple, papaya, pineapple, banana, and oranges), cereals (corn), and vegetables (beans, cabbage, carrots, lettuce, and potatoes) generate around 76 million tons of annual waste [10]. Therefore, it is necessary to find new technological and environmentally friendly solutions, to use fruit and vegetable waste as new raw materials, in order to develop and expand the production of bioproducts with high added value.

Agroindustrial waste has a great potential to generate food additives that can be beneficial to ensure global food sustainability [11]. Considering their high removal rates, by-products of plant sources can be used to obtain commercially valuable bioactive products [12]. A bioactive compound is a substance that has biological activity. In a broader sense, it is a substance that has an effect or can trigger a physiological response in a living organism. As they come from plant sources, bioactive compounds are phytoconstituents that are part of the food chain and are responsible for numerous beneficial changes in health. For example, antioxidant, anticancer, anti-inflammatory, antiallergic, antiatherogenic, and antiproliferative properties are the main bioactivities of the bioactive compounds [13].

Bioactive compounds are synthesized from some plant primary metabolites (e.g., amino acids) or from intermediate compounds obtained by primary metabolism in specialized cell types only during a particular growth stage, or under specific conditions, making their extraction and purification difficult [14]. Commercially useful bioactive compounds (secondary metabolites) are terpenoids, polyphenols, vitamins, alkaloids, etc. [15], which have been used to prevent the risk of diseases and in the treatment of a wide range of illness. In plants, they have a protective role against biotic and abiotic stress [16]. Given that bioactive compounds are present in different amounts, it is important to develop their production, in order to obtain as much as possible, and find new sources cheaper and alternative [17, 18]. Therefore, the materials considered waste can be a valuable source of bioactive compounds, able to be extracted and implemented in new processes and products for the replacement of chemical food additives.

The by-products of the fruit processing industry such as bark, peel, seeds, and pomace represent the largest amount of waste, which is made up of a wide variety of bioactive compounds with multiple biological properties. The exploitation of residues for the development of food products with added value could allow the generation of additional benefits. It is currently known that the cost of technologies for the purification of bioactive compounds exceeds the cost of reprocessing, so that the full use of waste with functional properties as additives could lead the food industry to reduce waste and increase its profitability [14].

Fruit and vegetable waste is mainly composed of lignocellulosic biomass, which is made up of cellulose (30–50%), hemicellulose (15–35%), and lignin (10–20%) [19], being a viable source of sugars and phenolic compounds. Phenolic compounds are classified as primary antioxidants that are free radical scavengers that inhibit lipid oxidation, reducing the formation of volatile compounds (aldehydes and ketones) that cause rancidity [20]. Phenolic compounds are important for their antioxidant properties and their protection against degenerative diseases such as cancer and heart disease [21]. Phenolic acids are a group of derivatives of benzoic and cinnamic acids such as capsaicin, ellagic, salicylic, tannic, vanillin, gallic, syringic, p-coumaric, o-coumaric, m-coumaric, caffeic, ferulic, sinapinic, and chlorogenic acids occurring in both forms, free and bound [9]. Flavonoids are compounds that consist of two aromatic rings joined by a three-carbon bond. Furthermore, flavonoids belong to different subclasses such as anthocyanins, flavonols, flavanones, flavones, and isoflavones. The structure of stilbenes is represented by two phenyl rings linked together by a bridge of two carbon atoms such as resveratrol and viniferine [20]. On the other hand, lignans are a complex, heterogeneous polymer, formed mainly by phenylpropanoid derivatives that correspond to the so-called monolignols (p-coumarilic, coniferyl, and sinapyllic alcohols) [16]. Coumarins are also simple phenolic compounds that have their chain side forming a cyclic structure (lactones or phenylpropanoids). Finally, tannins are grouped into two main classes: hydrolysable tannins, which are characterized by having a glycoside structure, and condensed tannins, which are polymers whose structures are related to flavonoid compounds (also called proanthocyanins, proanthocyanidins, or leucoanthocyanidins). Table 1 presents the main bioactive compounds in various plant residues with antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, anticancer, antiallergic, antithrombotic, cardioprotective, and vasodilator activities.

3. Overview of the Methods for Obtaining Bioactive Compounds Derived from Plant Residues

The discovery of the extraction of bioactive compounds and their applications as active principles for the treatment of diseases has led to an accentuated development of human society. Natural bioactive compounds play an important role in daily activities, associated with many health benefits and low toxicity or negative effects. In recent years, a high demand for natural bioactive compounds has been generated, creating the need to develop suitable methods, equipment, or strategies for the extraction of such compounds from natural sources [50–52].

The selection of the extraction method and the operational parameters of the process is always based on the overall performance of bioactive compounds. However, it is necessary to determine the family of compounds or the specific compound to be extracted, in order to optimize the operating conditions [51].

The strategy for the extraction of bioactive compounds from agroindustrial waste should aim to maximize the removal performance of bioactive compounds and create the minimum residue. The selected method should be adapted to satisfy the demands of industrial processing, such as bioactive compound purity and its conservation conditions to avoid deterioration and oxidation of the compounds, as well as ensure the quality characteristics of the final product and the sustainability of the process [53].

The bioactive compounds from agroindustrial residues such as fruits, vegetables, and plants can be extracted by different methodologies, which are described below. The extraction processes can be influenced by many factors including the solvent and matrix properties, particle size, process pressure, time, temperature, and the solvent-matrix ratio [54].

3.1. Solid-Liquid Extraction

The solid-liquid extraction, commonly called maceration, is the oldest technique to obtain nonvolatile compounds from plants, by using different solvents in contact with the vegetal matrix. This removal technique is the basis for many other new technologies to enhance extraction yields of bioactive molecules and reduce the time of separation, inducing to solvent and energy saving [53–55]. The yield of a solid-liquid extraction depends on the type of the polarities of the solvents, the mixture pH, the extraction time, and temperature, as well as on the chemical composition of the sample and the particle size [51].

The new technologies are based in solid-liquid extraction and are named “assisted” technologies such as microwave, ultrasonic, pressure, electrical technologies (ohmic heating), enzymatic, and mechanical (pressurized hot water extraction and subcritical fluid extraction) treatments. These new technologies are suitable for improving the recovery of valuable compounds, with different properties and bioactivities, since they use green solvents and allow plant cell disruption with better compound extraction, while minimize the impact on bioactive compounds [55].

3.2. Microwave-Assisted Extraction

Microwave-assisted extraction (MAE) is a solid-liquid extraction with microwave heating. The microwaves are electromagnetic waves whose frequency varies between 300 MHz and 300 GHz. The microwave heating is produced by the capacity of the samples to absorb the microwave energy and convert it into heat. The conversion of microwave energy into heat occurs due to dipolar and ionic mechanisms. The presence of polar molecules is the cause of microwave heating due the dipolar nature of water. Microwave generates an oscillating electric field, and the permanently polarized dipolar molecules try to realign in the direction of the electric field, causing internal friction of the molecules resulting in the heating of the material [56–58].

The principal advantages of MAE are the high yields of extraction, compatibility with the environment, short extraction time, rapid temperature increase, high efficiency, better monitoring of the process, and low energy consumption and cost [59]. MAE efficiency for bioactive compounds extraction depends on particle size, irradiation time, power, and solid-to-liquid ratio. MAE has been applied to extract many natural compounds from agroindustrial residues from vegetables and fruits to obtain bioactive compounds, mainly antioxidants, polysaccharides, and oils rich in carotenoids and polyphenolic compounds [60].

3.3. Ultrasonic-Assisted Extraction

Ultrasonic-assisted extraction is a widely used technology to extract bioactive compounds from many agroindustrial wastes. The principle is based on the effects of cavitation, which intensify the mass transfer between the solvent and the matrix. The collapse of cavitation bubbles near tissue surfaces produces microjet impingement, resulting in tissue disruption and deep penetration of the solvent into the tissue matrix, increasing the extraction yield. Ultrasonic extraction offers an advantage in terms of shorter processing time and enhanced quality, and it is considered an environmentally friendly technology [46, 61].

3.4. Subcritical Water Extraction

Extraction with subcritical water is a recent method to extract bioactive compounds that uses solvents under high temperature (100-374°C) and critical pressure (1–22.1 MPa), to dissolve active substances from the raw materials. Due to these extreme conditions, the solubility of the compounds of interest is increased, making it possible to use water instead of organic solvents. The addition of ethanol helps reducing the extraction temperature and the concentration of toxic compounds, generated by the Maillard reaction in agroindustrial waste. Subcritical extraction has the advantages of obtaining high extraction yields, with an extremely low number of solvents and short operating times. However, there are some disadvantages: the need to raise the temperature, and for the extraction of several heat-sensitive compounds, high temperatures are not suitable and they result degraded [51, 62, 63].

3.5. Supercritical Fluid Extraction

Supercritical fluid extraction is a green extraction method that has been widely used to obtain bioactive compounds from different raw materials, with the application of carbon dioxide as a renewable and green solvent. The low price of extraction, low temperature of extraction, and no toxicity of carbon dioxide make this method of great option to extract bioactive compounds from agroindustrial residues [64, 65].

3.6. Membrane Technology

The final disposal of agroindustrial aqueous waste has become a major challenge for food processing industries, due to its negative impact on the environment. Pressure-driven membrane processes such as micro-, nano-, and ultrafiltration have several benefits in the treatment of wastewaters: high separation efficiency, low energy requirements, easy scale-up, simple operation, high productivity, and the absence of phase transition. Many bioactive compounds have been recovered from agroindustrial wastes using membrane technology, such as antioxidant compounds, carbohydrates, pectin, proteins, sugars, and phenolic compounds [66].

3.7. Fermentation and Enzymatic Process

The production or biotransformation of bioactive compounds through fermentation or enzymatic processes from agroindustrial residues has increased in recent years. Solid-state fermentation (SSF) is a bioprocess where the enzymes released by a microorganism (bacteria, fungi, or yeast) act as biocatalysts and allow better release and extraction of bioactive compounds from different substrates. SSF is an economical biotechnological process, easy to implement as it requires small equipment and low capital investment. The enzymatic processes are more complex, are expensive, and have some limitations such as low stability, recovery, and temperature sensitivity that can be reduced using enzyme immobilization [55]. Most microorganisms used are filamentous fungi such as Trichoderma and Aspergillus, due to its high production of secondary metabolites, and enzymes that can be used to metabolize agroindustrial residues to produce different bioactive compounds [67].

4. Edible Films and Coatings as Postharvest Techniques

To avoid or reduce the adverse postharvest effects, different technologies have been implemented. Between the most used methods are storage at low temperatures, the application of gamma and ultraviolet radiation, conservation in controlled atmosphere, and use of plastic packaging, among others [68, 69]. Seeking for the improvement in the nutritional quality and commercial value of horticultural products, there is research focused on the development of edible films and coatings. They provide the possibility of enhancing the safety of the product by acting as a barrier against the transport of water vapor, oxygen, and compounds responsible for flavor, color, and aroma [70–73].

An edible film (EF) is a preformed matrix, obtained by molding, while an edible coating (EC) is a transparent, continuous, edible, and thin matrix, which is placed on the surface of the food by immersing or spraying the coating-forming solution, whose thickness is always less than that of EFs [74]. Both the EF and EC have the purpose of preserving the quality of the product, serving as packaging, and extending its useful life.

The EF and EC forming solutions are setup of components that are divided into three main categories, as indicated in Table 2. However, the formulation of both the films and the coatings will depend on the function that they will carry out. Additionally, both can act as supports that contain bioactive compounds such as antimicrobials, antioxidants, pigments, and compounds that provide flavor and aroma, preservatives, vitamins, and minerals, among others (Figure 1). Within the compounds that are usually used to provide stability to EF and EC are emulsifiers, surfactants, and plasticizers. The emulsifier holds the components together in the forming solution; the surfactant reduces the surface tension of the formulation, achieving greater uniformity; the plasticizer modifies its mechanical properties [75].

The use of edible films and coatings has proven to be an effective method of food preservation. However, when coating a fruit or vegetable, it is necessary that there should be a certain permeability to oxygen and carbon dioxide, in order to avoid anaerobic respiration. This anaerobic respiration could induce physiological disorders and a rapid loss of the quality and shelf life in food [77]. For this reason, the proper selection of the formulation is of utmost importance. Table 3 shows various studies of the components used as EC and/or EF, as well as their effects on fruit and vegetable products.

5. Microbial Inhibition Methods by Bioactive Compounds When Incorporated in the Postharvest Stage

The postharvest decomposition of fruits and vegetables by the action of pathogenic microorganisms represents significant levels in the losses of these products [99]. The incorporation of bioactive compounds in the postharvest of fruit and vegetable products has resulted in controlling the incidence of pathogenic microorganisms [100]. Table 4 shows some examples of antimicrobial activity of bioactive compounds recovered from plant residues and applied on plant products in the postharvest stage.

The exploration of natural plant products as a source of bioactive compounds for the protection of postharvest loss of fruits and vegetables is in its early stages. The information available on the mechanisms of action of plant extracts is scarce; its antimicrobial activity is probably attributable to more than one mode of action [101]. However, there are different sources that have cited the mechanisms by which these compounds exert their antimicrobial effects, mainly inhibiting deteriorating fungi and pathogenic bacteria.

Anibal et al. [102] reported that the antifungal effects of extracts of the pericarp and pomegranate peel with high amounts of punicalagin and tannins are attributed to changes in the structure and cell morphology of the Candida genus. When observed by electron microscopy, the treated cells presented irregular cell walls, with viscous material on the surface as well as hyphal rupture and desquamation.

It has also been described that aldehyde, a group of volatile compounds, interferes in fungal cell division by reacting and inactivating sulfhydryl, a functional group involved in the division of fungal cells. Compounds such as cinnamaldehyde (extracted from cinnamon), citral (extracted from lemon grass), and perillaldehyde (extracted from the perilla plant) are good electron acceptors. These compounds act by disrupting fungal metabolism by forming a charge transfer complex with electron donors present in fungal cells [103].

Besides, the polyphenols of green tea (Camelia sinensis) have been studied for their antifungal capacity against the fungus that affects rice. The study showed a change in the permeability of the membrane of the rice fungus when presenting an increase in the percentage of electrolyte leakage. Since phenolic hydroxyl groups can bind the hydrophilic end of the lipid bilayer to agglomerate the lipid of the membrane, thus, these damage the cell membrane and promote electrolyte leakage. Furthermore, green tea polyphenols have shown antimicrobial activity at high doses of epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG), damaging the liposome membrane in E. coli and S. aureus, leaking intramembrane materials and consequently the aggregation of liposomes. In addition, these polyphenols have been shown to strongly inhibit the biofilm formation of pathogenic E. coli strains, by reducing the expression of the regulatory protein “CsgD,” a crucial activator in cellulose biosynthesis [104].

The antimicrobial capacity of some phenolic compounds extracted from mango residues, such as galangin, is attributed to the inhibition of cellular DNA gyrase in bacteria. The inhibition of the enzyme topoisomerase IV, as well as the anti-beta-lactamase activity (bind metals and proteins, affecting their bioavailability), generates nonspecific effects that trigger antioxidant and antimicrobial phenomena [105].

Organic acids have presented a mechanism of action in the inhibition of microorganisms that are related to acid-base balance, proton donation, and cell energy production. The cell of microorganisms in a normal state maintains equilibrium by establishing an internal pH close to neutrality. Cell homeostasis was defined as the establishment of a chemical balance in the face of environmental changes, damage to microbial cells, causing their alteration. When a change in pH occurs, proteins, nucleic acids, and phospholipids of the microbial cell can be structurally altered [106].

Various publications suggest that the main mechanism of the antimicrobial effects of volatile compounds extracted from different fruits indicates potential damage to the bacterial membrane, generating changes in permeability, polarization, and interruption of flow activity. Phenolic compounds have shown the ability to modify the regulation of genes associated with certain virulence attributes in bacteria, including hydrophobicity, adherence, motility, invasion, and biofilm generation. The above indicates the potential of phenolic compounds extracted from fruits as antimicrobials [107].

Other authors have described the mechanisms of action that some bioactive compounds generally present. Lauzardo et al. [108] mention that the toxicity effect of phenols on microorganisms can be attributed to enzymatic inhibition of compound oxidation. Terpenes and essential oils, although not fully studied, can cause membrane rupture by lipophilic compounds. The alkaloids are embedded in the DNA, while lecithins and polypeptides form ion channels in the cell membranes of microorganisms or, by competitive inhibition, cause adhesion of microbial proteins to the host’s receptor polysaccharides.

6. Conclusions

Bioactive compounds are lined up to help revolutionize postharvest technologies and achieve improved increases in the shelf life of fruits and vegetables. The different protection mechanisms they provide make them versatile to the various forms of application of current postharvest technologies. Phenolic compounds and their derivatives are to date the substances with the greatest protection properties against oxidative stress, as well as against the attack of microorganisms.

The use of residues of plant origin follows the ideology of circular bioeconomy, seeking sustainable processes that allow to earn an added value. Plant-based waste is a rich source for obtaining bioactive compounds. The challenge lies in the improvement of the current technologies or looking for new ones that allow a higher percentage of obtaining bioactive compounds, as well as methods for incorporation into fruit and horticultural products. Further research should be made focused on the exploration of novel sources of bioactive compounds from vegetal wastes, their green extraction methods, and the evaluation of microbial inhibition mechanisms. The literature indicates that the main mechanism of action for the compounds extracted from plant sources as antimicrobial agents is damage to the cellular structure. Although there is information that allows to explain these effects, more studies are necessary for a complete understanding of the different mechanisms of action by bioactive compounds on the presence of spoilage and pathogenic microorganisms in the postharvest stages.

Data Availability

The data supporting this systematic review are from previously reported studies and datasets, which have been cited.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

A. K. Thompson, R. K. Prange, R. Bancroft, and T. Puttongsiri, Controlled Atmosphere Storage of Fruit and Vegetables, CABI, 2018.
C. F. FAO and D. K. Navarro, Food Loss Index from Post-Harvest to Distribution, 2016, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 2016.
M. Pateiro, P. E. S. Munekata, C. Tsatsanis et al., “Chapter four-evaluation of the protein and bioactive compound bioaccessibility/bioavailability and cytotoxicity of the extracts obtained from aquaculture and fisheries by-products,” in Advances in Food and Nutrition Research, J. M. Lorenzo and F. J. Barba, Eds., pp. 97–125, Academic Press, 2020.
View at: Google Scholar
A. Hamzalıoğlu and V. Gökmen, “Chapter 18-interaction between bioactive carbonyl compounds and asparagine and impact on acrylamide,” in Acrylamide in Food, V. Gökmen, Ed., pp. 355–376, Academic Press, 2016.
View at: Google Scholar
M. Fidelis, C. de Moura, T. Kabbas Junior et al., “Fruit seeds as sources of bioactive compounds: sustainable production of high value-added ingredients from by-products within circular economy,” Molecules, vol. 24, no. 21, p. 3854, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. B. Fao, Food Loss and Waste Database, FAO, 2017.
M. A. García, Películas y cubiertas de quitosana en la conservación de vegetales, AquaDocs-Ciencia y Tecnologia de los alimentos, 2008.
A. A. Castro, J. D. R. Pimentel, D. S. Souza, T. V. D. Oliveira, and M. D. C. Oliveira, Estudio de la conservación de la papaya (Carica papaya L.) asociado a la aplicación de películas comestibles, Revista Venezolana de Ciencia y Tecnología de Alimentos, 2011.
N. Leyva-López, C. E. Lizárraga-Velázquez, C. Hernández, and E. Y. Sánchez-Gutiérrez, “Exploitation of agro-industrial waste as potential source of bioactive compounds for aquaculture,” Foods, vol. 9, no. 7, p. 843, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. E. González-Sánchez, S. Pérez-Fabiel, A. Wong-Villarreal, R. Bello-Mendoza, and G. Yañez-Ocampo, “Agroindustrial wastes methanization and bacterial composition in anaerobic digestion,” Revista Argentina de Microbiología, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 229–235, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Görgüç, E. Gençdağ, and F. M. Yılmaz, “Bioactive peptides derived from plant origin by-products: biological activities and techno-functional utilizations in food developments–a review,” Food Research International, vol. 136, no. article 109504, 2020.
View at: Google Scholar
S. A. Salami, G. Luciano, M. N. O'Grady et al., “Sustainability of feeding plant by-products: a review of the implications for ruminant meat production,” Animal Feed Science and Technology, vol. 251, pp. 37–55, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Guaadaoui, S. Benaicha, N. Elmajdoub, M. Bellaoui, and A. Hamal, “What is a bioactive compound? A combined definition for a preliminary consensus,” International Journal of Nutrition and Food Sciences, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 174–179, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Ayala-Zavala, V. Vega-Vega, C. Rosas-Domínguez et al., “Agro-industrial potential of exotic fruit byproducts as a source of food additives,” Food Research International, vol. 44, no. 7, pp. 1866–1874, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. F. Gemede and N. Ratta, “Antinutritional factors in plant foods: potential health benefits and adverse effects,” International Journal of Nutrition and Food Sciences, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 284–289, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Z. Viña and A. R. Chaves, “Effect of heat treatment and refrigerated storage on antioxidant properties of pre-cut celery (Apium graveolens L.),” International Journal of Food Science & Technology, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 44–51, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Azmir, I. S. M. Zaidul, M. Rahman et al., “Techniques for extraction of bioactive compounds from plant materials: a review,” Journal of Food Engineering, vol. 117, no. 4, pp. 426–436, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Cvjetko Bubalo, S. Vidović, I. Radojčić Redovniković, and S. Jokić, “New perspective in extraction of plant biologically active compounds by green solvents,” Food and Bioproducts Processing, vol. 109, pp. 52–73, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Aguirre-Fierro, M. S. Pino, E. Zanuso et al., “Biochemical and thermochemical platforms for bioproducts and biofuels in terms of biorefinery,” in Advances in Food Bioproducts and Bioprocessing Technologies, pp. 145–192, CRC Press, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Shahidi and P. Ambigaipalan, “Phenolics and polyphenolics in foods, beverages and spices: antioxidant activity and health effects - a review,” Journal of Functional Foods, vol. 18, pp. 820–897, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. H. Nour-Eldin, S. R. Madsen, S. Engelen et al., “Reduction of antinutritional glucosinolates in Brassica oilseeds by mutation of genes encoding transporters,” Nature Biotechnology, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 377–382, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. C. Rossi, S. R. da Rosa, P. Weimer, J. G. Lisbôa Moura, V. R. de Oliveira, and J. de Castilhos, “Assessment of compounds and cytotoxicity of Citrus deliciosa Tenore essential oils: from an underexploited by-product to a rich source of high-value bioactive compounds,” Food Bioscience, vol. 38, article 100779, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Saini, D. Panwar, P. Panesar, and M. B. Bera, “Bioactive compounds from cereal and pulse processing byproducts and their potential health benefits,” Austin Journal of Nutrition & Metabolism, vol. 6, no. 2, p. 1068, 2019.
View at: Google Scholar
Y. Chen, J. Wen, Z. Deng, X. Pan, X. Xie, and C. Peng, “Effective utilization of food wastes: bioactivity of grape seed extraction and its application in food industry,” Journal of Functional Foods, vol. 73, article 104113, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Ghafoor, Y. H. Choi, J. Y. Jeon, and I. H. Jo, “Optimization of ultrasound-assisted extraction of phenolic compounds, antioxidants, and anthocyanins from grape (Vitis vinifera) seeds,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 57, no. 11, pp. 4988–4994, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. V. Ruales Salcedo, A. F. Rojas González, and C. A. Cardona Alzate, “Obtención de compuestos fenólicos a partir de residuos de uva isabella (Vitis labrusca),” Biotecnología en el Sector Agropecuario y Agroindustrial, vol. 15, no. Edición Especial 2, pp. 72–72, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Corrales, S. Toepfl, P. Butz, D. Knorr, and B. Tauscher, “Extraction of anthocyanins from grape by-products assisted by ultrasonics, high hydrostatic pressure or pulsed electric fields: a comparison,” Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 85–91, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. M. Garcia-Castello, A. D. Rodriguez-Lopez, L. Mayor, R. Ballesteros, C. Conidi, and A. Cassano, “Optimization of conventional and ultrasound assisted extraction of flavonoids from grapefruit (Citrus paradisi L.) solid wastes,” LWT, vol. 64, no. 2, pp. 1114–1122, 2015.
View at: Google Scholar
N. H. Alias and Z. Abbas, “Preliminary investigation on the total phenolic content and antioxidant activity of pineapple wastes via microwave-assisted extraction at fixed microwave power,” Chemical Engineering Transactions, vol. 56, pp. 1675–1680, 2017.
View at: Google Scholar
Y. R. R. S. Rezende, J. P. Nogueira, and N. Narain, “Comparison and optimization of conventional and ultrasound assisted extraction for bioactive compounds and antioxidant activity from agro-industrial acerola (Malpighia emarginata DC) residue,” LWT, vol. 85, pp. 158–169, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. Briones-Labarca, M. Plaza-Morales, C. Giovagnoli-Vicuña, and F. Jamett, “High hydrostatic pressure and ultrasound extractions of antioxidant compounds, sulforaphane and fatty acids from Chilean papaya (Vasconcellea pubescens) seeds: effects of extraction conditions and methods,” LWT, vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 525–534, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. J. Salazar-López, J. A. Domínguez-Avila, E. M. Yahia et al., “Avocado fruit and by-products as potential sources of bioactive compounds,” Food Research International, vol. 138, article 109774, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Vázquez-González, Á. Fernández-Prior, A. Bermúdez Oria et al., “Utilization of strawberry and raspberry waste for the extraction of bioactive compounds by deep eutectic solvents,” LWT, vol. 130, article 109645, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. C. Barreira, A. A. Arraibi, and I. C. Ferreira, “Bioactive and functional compounds in apple pomace from juice and cider manufacturing: potential use in dermal formulations,” Trends in Food Science & Technology, vol. 90, pp. 76–87, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. C. Vodnar, L. F. Călinoiu, F. V. Dulf, B. E. Ştefănescu, G. Crişan, and C. Socaciu, “Identification of the bioactive compounds and antioxidant, antimutagenic and antimicrobial activities of thermally processed agro-industrial waste,” Food Chemistry, vol. 231, pp. 131–140, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Wang, L. Li, H. Liu et al., “Bioactive compounds andin vitroantioxidant activities of peel, flesh and seed powder of kiwi fruit,” International Journal of Food Science & Technology, vol. 53, no. 9, pp. 2239–2245, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. H. Okino Delgado and L. F. Fleuri, “Orange and mango by-products: agro-industrial waste as source of bioactive compounds and botanical versus commercial description—a review,” Food Reviews International, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 1–14, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Ferarsa, W. Zhang, N. Moulai-Mostefa, L. Ding, M. Y. Jaffrin, and N. Grimi, “Recovery of anthocyanins and other phenolic compounds from purple eggplant peels and pulps using ultrasonic-assisted extraction,” Food and Bioproducts Processing, vol. 109, pp. 19–28, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Benvenutti, A. . P. Sanchez-Camargo, A. A. F. Zielinski, and S. R. S. Ferreira, “NADES as potential solvents for anthocyanin and pectin extraction from Myrciaria cauliflora fruit by-product: in silico and experimental approaches for solvent selection,” Journal of Molecular Liquids, vol. 315, p. 113761, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Rodrigues, F. A. Fernandes, E. S. de Brito, A. D. Sousa, and N. Narain, “Ultrasound extraction of phenolics and anthocyanins from jabuticaba peel,” Industrial Crops and Products, vol. 69, pp. 400–407, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Pan, W. Qu, H. Ma, G. G. Atungulu, and T. H. McHugh, “Continuous and pulsed ultrasound-assisted extractions of antioxidants from pomegranate peel,” Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 365–372, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Viganó, A. C. Aguiar, D. R. Moraes et al., “Sequential high pressure extractions applied to recover piceatannol and scirpusin B from passion fruit bagasse,” Food Research International, vol. 85, pp. 51–58, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Chihoub, M. I. Dias, L. Barros et al., “Valorisation of the green waste parts from turnip, radish and wild cardoon: nutritional value, phenolic profile and bioactivity evaluation,” Food Research International, vol. 126, article 108651, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Melgar, M. I. Dias, A. Ciric et al., “By-product recovery of Opuntia spp. peels: betalainic and phenolic profiles and bioactive properties,” Industrial Crops and Products, vol. 107, pp. 353–359, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Plazzotta, M. Cottes, P. Simeoni, and L. Manzocco, “Evaluating the environmental and economic impact of fruit and vegetable waste valorisation: the lettuce waste study-case,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 262, article 121435, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Banožić, J. Babić, and S. Jokić, “Recent advances in extraction of bioactive compounds from tobacco industrial waste-a review,” Industrial Crops and Products, vol. 144, article 112009, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Kalogeropoulos, A. Chiou, V. Pyriochou, A. Peristeraki, and V. T. Karathanos, “Bioactive phytochemicals in industrial tomatoes and their processing byproducts,” LWT, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 213–216, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. F. Battistella Lasta, L. Lentz, L. G. Gonçalves Rodrigues, N. Mezzomo, L. Vitali, and S. R. Salvador Ferreira, “Pressurized liquid extraction applied for the recovery of phenolic compounds from beetroot waste,” Biocatalysis and Agricultural Biotechnology, vol. 21, article 101353, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. B. Gonzales, K. Raes, H. Vanhoutte, S. Coelus, G. Smagghe, and J. van Camp, “Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry coupled with multivariate analysis for the characterization and discrimination of extractable and nonextractable polyphenols and glucosinolates from red cabbage and Brussels sprout waste streams,” Journal of Chromatography A, vol. 1402, pp. 60–70, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Gullón, B. Gullón, A. Romaní, G. Rocchetti, and J. M. Lorenzo, “Smart advanced solvents for bioactive compounds recovery from agri-food by-products: a review,” Trends in Food Science & Technology, vol. 101, pp. 182–197, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Zhang, C. Wen, H. Zhang, Y. Duan, and H. Ma, “Recent advances in the extraction of bioactive compounds with subcritical water: a review,” Trends in Food Science & Technology, vol. 95, pp. 183–195, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Uribe, A. Delgadillo, C. Giovagnoli-Vicuña, I. Quispe-Fuentes, and L. Zura-Bravo, “Extraction techniques for bioactive compounds and antioxidant capacity determination of Chilean papaya (Vasconcellea pubescens) fruit,” Journal of Chemistry, vol. 2015, Article ID 347532, 8 pages, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. C. Coelho, R. N. Pereira, A. S. Rodrigues, J. A. Teixeira, and M. E. Pintado, “The use of emergent technologies to extract added value compounds from grape by-products,” Trends in Food Science & Technology, vol. 106, pp. 182–197, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Lefebvre, E. Destandau, and E. Lesellier, “Selective extraction of bioactive compounds from plants using recent extraction techniques: a review,” Journal of Chromatography A, vol. 1635, pp. 461770–461770, 2021.
View at: Google Scholar
P. Sharma, V. K. Gaur, R. Sirohi, S. Varjani, S. Hyoun Kim, and J. W. C. Wong, “Sustainable processing of food waste for production of bio-based products for circular bioeconomy,” Bioresource Technology, vol. 325, pp. 124684–124684, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Q. Guo, D.-W. Sun, J.-H. Cheng, and Z. Han, “Microwave processing techniques and their recent applications in the food industry,” Trends in Food Science & Technology, vol. 67, pp. 236–247, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. G. Araújo, R. M. Rodríguez-Jasso, H. A. Ruiz et al., “Hydrothermal–microwave processing for starch extraction from Mexican avocado seeds: operational conditions and characterization,” Processes, vol. 8, no. 7, p. 759, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Sarfarazi, S. M. Jafari, G. Rajabzadeh, and C. M. Galanakis, “Evaluation of microwave-assisted extraction technology for separation of bioactive components of saffron (Crocus sativus L.),” Industrial Crops & Products, vol. 145, article 111978, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. G. Araújo, R. M. Rodriguez-Jasso, H. A. Ruiz, M. Govea-Salas, M. E. Pintado, and C. N. Aguilar, “Process optimization of microwave-assisted extraction of bioactive molecules from avocado seeds,” Industrial Crops and Products, vol. 154, article 112623, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. G. Araujo, R. M. Rodríguez-Jasso, H. A. Ruíz, M. Govea-Salas, M. Pintado, and C. N. Aguilar, “Recovery of bioactive components from avocado peels using microwave-assisted extraction,” Food and Bioproducts Processing, vol. 127, pp. 152–161, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. O. Perera and M. A. J. Alzahrani, “Ultrasound as a pre-treatment for extraction of bioactive compounds and food safety: a review,” LWT, vol. 142, article 111114, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. G. Gonçalves Rodrigues, S. Mazzutti, L. Vitali, G. A. Micke, and S. R. S. Ferreira, “Recovery of bioactive phenolic compounds from papaya seeds agroindustrial residue using subcritical water extraction,” Biocatalysis and Agricultural Biotechnology, vol. 22, article 101367, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Xu, D. Fang, X. Tian et al., “Subcritical water extraction of bioactive compounds from waste cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) flowers,” Industrial Crops and Products, vol. 164, article 113369, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Ahangari, J. W. King, A. Ehsani, and M. Yousefi, “Supercritical fluid extraction of seed oils - a short review of current trends,” Trends in Food Science & Technology, vol. 111, pp. 249–260, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Tita, A. Navarrete, Á. Martín, and M. J. Cocero, “Model assisted supercritical fluid extraction and fractionation of added-value products from tobacco scrap,” The Journal of Supercritical Fluids, vol. 167, article 105046, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Castro-Muñoz, J. Yáñez-Fernández, and V. Fíla, “Phenolic compounds recovered from agro-food by-products using membrane technologies: an overview,” Food Chemistry, vol. 213, pp. 753–762, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. R. B. Feitosa, T. R. J. Santos, N. C. Gualberto, N. Narain, and L. C. L. de Aquino Santana, “Solid-state fermentation with Aspergillus niger for the bio-enrichment of bioactive compounds in Moringa oleifera (moringa) leaves,” Biocatalysis and Agricultural Biotechnology, vol. 27, article 101709, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Núñez-Castellano, G. Castellano, R. Ramírez-Méndez, M. Sindoni, and C. Marin, “Efecto del cloruro de calcio y una cubierta plástica sobre la conservación de las propiedades organolépticas de la fresa (Fragaria X Ananassa Duch),” Revista Iberoamericana de Tecnología Postcosecha, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 21–30, 2012.
View at: Google Scholar
J. Aguilar, Métodos de conservación de alimentos (E. L. Buendía, Ed.). Red Tercer Milenio., 2012.
M. Vargas, C. González-Martínez, A. Chiralt, and M. Cháfer, “Estudio preliminar del uso de recubrimientos de quitosano y de microorganismos eficaces en el control postcosecha de la podredumbre azul de naranjas,” V Congreso Iberoamericano de Tecnología Postcosecha y Agroexportaciones, Universidad Católica del Maule, pp. 1416–1423, 2007.
View at: Google Scholar
M. B. Vásconez, S. K. Flores, C. A. Campos, J. Alvarado, and L. N. Gerschenson, “Antimicrobial activity and physical properties of chitosan-tapioca starch based edible films and coatings,” Food Research International, vol. 42, no. 7, pp. 762–769, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. C. Díaz Narváez, L. E. Pérez Cabrera, L. C. Hernández Lozano, and M. M. Ramírez Gómez, “Desarrollo de un recubrimiento comestible a base de mucílago de linaza y quitosano y su aplicación para extender la vida útil de fresas,” XII Congreso Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología de Alimentos, Universidad Autónoma de Aguascalientes, pp. 1341–1346, 2010.
View at: Google Scholar
J. I. Restrepo and I. D. Aristizábal, “Conservación de fresa (fragaria x ananassa duch cv. camarosa) mediante la aplicación de recubrimientos comestibles de gel mucilaginoso de penca sábila (aloe barbadensis miller) y cera de carnaúba,” Vitae, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 252–263, 2010.
View at: Google Scholar
V. del-Valle, P. Hernández-Muñoz, A. Guarda, and M. J. Galotto, “Development of a cactus-mucilage edible coating (Opuntia ficus indica) and its application to extend strawberry (Fragaria ananassa) shelf-life,” Food Chemistry, vol. 91, no. 4, pp. 751–756, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. J. P. Espitia, R. J. Avena-Bustillos, W. X. du, R. F. Teófilo, N. F. F. Soares, and T. H. McHugh, “Optimal antimicrobial formulation and physical-mechanical properties of edible films based on açai and pectin for food preservation,” Food Packaging and Shelf Life, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 38–49, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. Falguera, J. Quintero, A. Jiménez, J. A. Muñoz, and A. Ibarz, “Edible films and coatings: structures, active functions and trends in their use,” Trends in Food Science & Technology, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 292–303, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Ribeiro, A. A. Vicente, J. A. Teixeira, and C. Miranda, “Optimization of edible coating composition to retard strawberry fruit senescence,” Postharvest Biology and Technology, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 63–70, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. I. Olivas, J. J. Rodriguez, and G. V. Barbosa-Cánovas, “Edible coatings composed of methylcellulose, stearic acid, and additives to preserve quality of pear wedges,” Journal of Food Processing and Preservation, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 299–320, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P.-J. Chien, F. Sheu, and F.-H. Yang, “Effects of edible chitosan coating on quality and shelf life of sliced mango fruit,” Journal of Food Engineering, vol. 78, no. 1, pp. 225–229, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Rojas-Graü, M. Tapia, F. Rodríguez, A. J. Carmona, and O. Martin-Belloso, “Alginate and gellan-based edible coatings as carriers of antibrowning agents applied on fresh-cut Fuji apples,” Food Hydrocolloids, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 118–127, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Ávila-Sosa and A. López-Malo, “Aplicación de sustancias antimicrobianas a películas y recubrimientos comestibles,” Temas selectos de ingeniería de alimentos, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 4–13, 2008.
View at: Google Scholar
M. Aider, “Chitosan application for active bio-based films production and potential in the food industry: review,” LWT, vol. 43, no. 6, pp. 837–842, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Maqbool, A. Ali, S. Ramachandran, D. R. Smith, and P. G. Alderson, “Control of postharvest anthracnose of banana using a new edible composite coating,” Crop Protection, vol. 29, no. 10, pp. 1136–1141, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Sánchez-González, C. Pastor, M. Vargas, A. Chiralt, C. González-Martínez, and M. Cháfer, “Effect of hydroxypropylmethylcellulose and chitosan coatings with and without bergamot essential oil on quality and safety of cold-stored grapes,” Postharvest Biology and Technology, vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 57–63, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. T. Navarro, J. Pérez, and D. Durán, “Empleo de recubrimientos comestibles con base en almidón de papa y yuca en la conservación del mango cv. Zapote,” limentech, Ciencia y Tecnología Alimentaria, vol. 10, no. 1, 2011.
View at: Google Scholar
P. L. Barco Hernández, A. C. Burbano Delgado, S. A. Mosquera Sánchez, H. S. Villada Castillo, and D. P. Navia Porras, “Efecto del recubrimiento a base de almidón de yuca modificado sobre la maduración del tomate,” Revista Lasallista de Investigación, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 96–103, 2011.
View at: Google Scholar
M. A. López-Mata, S. Ruiz-Cruz, C. Navarro-Preciado et al., “Efecto de recubrimientos comestibles de quitosano en la reducción microbiana y conservación de la calidad de fresas,” Biotecnia, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 33–43, 2015.
View at: Google Scholar
F. Rico, “Efecto de recubrimientos comestibles de quitosano y aceites esenciales en la calidad microbiológica de mango (Mangifera indica L.) mínimamente procesado,” Vitae, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. S117–S119, 2012.
View at: Google Scholar
E. Ochoa-Reyes, G. Martínez-Vazquez, S. Saucedo-Pompa et al., “Improvement of shelf life quality of green bell peppers using edible coating formulations,” Journal of Microbiology, Biotechnology and Food Sciences, vol. 2021, pp. 2448–2451, 2021.
View at: Google Scholar
D. R. Moreno, Efecto de dos gomas y tintura de propóleo en el desarrollo de un recubrimiento evaluado en zanahoria (Daucus carota) Escuela Agrícola Panamericana, 2013, https://bdigital.zamorano.edu/bitstream/11036/1672/1/AGI-2013-T031.pdf.
J. Andrade, D. Acosta, M. Bucheli, and G. C. Luna, “Elaboración y evaluación de un recubrimiento comestible para la conservación postcosecha del tomate de árbol Cyphomandra betacea Cav. Sendt,” Revista de Ciencias Agrícolas, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 60–72, 2013.
View at: Google Scholar
A. Escobar Hernández, C. J. Márquez Cardozo, C. E. Restrepo Flores, J. A. Cano Salazar, and J. H. Patiño Gómez, “Aplicación de tratamiento térmico, recubrimiento comestible y baño químico como tratamientos poscosecha para la conservación de hortalizas mínimamente procesadas,” Acta Agronómica, vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. Cruz, R. Rojas, S. Saucedo-Pompa et al., “Improvement of shelf life and sensory quality of pears using a specialized edible coating,” Journal of Chemistry, vol. 2015, Article ID 138707, 7 pages, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. M. Estrada Mesa, F. Padilla Reyes, and C. J. Márquez Cardozo, “Efecto de recubrimientos protectores sobre la calidad del mango (Mangifera indica L.) en poscosecha,” Revista UDCA Actualidad & Divulgación Científica, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 181–188, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Pavón-Vargas and S. Valencia-Chamorro, “Efecto de recubrimientos comestibles compuestos a base de goma tara en la calidad poscosecha de frutilla (Fragaria ananassa),” Revista Iberoamericana de Tecnología Postcosecha, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 65–70, 2016.
View at: Google Scholar
R. E. González, Y. C. Cervantes, and L. D. C. Caraballo, “Conservación de la guayaba (Psidium guajava L.) en postcosecha mediante un recubrimiento comestible binario,” Revista Temas Agrarios, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 54–64, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Garcia-Figueroa, A. Ayala-Aponte, and M. I. Sánchez-Tamayo, “Efecto de recubrimientos comestibles de Aloe vera y alginato de sodio sobre la calidad poscosecha de fresa,” Revista U.D.C.A Actualidad & Divulgación Científica, vol. 22, no. 2, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. A. Martínez-Mendoza, O. F. Mora, J. R. Sánchez-Pale et al., “Evaluación de recubrimiento comestible a base de pectina de tejocote en postcosecha de tihuixocote (Ximenia americana L., olacaceae),,” Acta Agrícola y Pecuaria, vol. 6, no. 1, 2020.
View at: Google Scholar
R. Sharma, D. Singh, and R. Singh, “Biological control of postharvest diseases of fruits and vegetables by microbial antagonists: a review,” Biological Control, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 205–221, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. D. L. Ramos-García, S. Bautista-Baños, L. L. Barrera-Necha, E. Bosquez-Molina, I. Alia-Tejacal, and M. Estrada-Carrillo, “Compuestos antimicrobianos adicionados en recubrimientos comestibles para uso en productos hortofrutícolas,” Revista mexicana de fitopatología, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 44–57, 2010.
View at: Google Scholar
I. Talibi, H. Boubaker, E. Boudyach, and A. Ait Ben Aoumar, “Alternative methods for the control of postharvest citrus diseases,” Journal of Applied Microbiology, vol. 117, no. 1, pp. 1–17, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. C. Anibal, I. T. A. Peixoto, M. A. Foglio, and J. F. Höfling, “Antifungal activity of the ethanolic extracts of Punica granatum L. and evaluation of the morphological and structural modifications of its compounds upon the cells of Candida spp,” Brazilian Journal of Microbiology, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 839–848, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Taghavi, C. Kim, and A. Rahemi, “Role of natural volatiles and essential oils in extending shelf life and controlling postharvest microorganisms of small fruits,” Microorganisms, vol. 6, no. 4, p. 104, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Yang and T. Zhang, “Antimicrobial activities of tea polyphenol on phytopathogens: a review,” Molecules, vol. 24, no. 4, p. 816, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Siller-Sánchez, O. B. Alvarez-Pérez, C. N. Aguilar et al., “Polifenoles de Cáscara de mango (Mangifera caesia var. Ataulfo): Una Alternativa Antioxidante y Antimicrobiana Antioxidante y Antimicrobiana polyphenols from mango peels (Mangifera Mangifera caesia var. Ataulfo): an antioxidant: an antioxidant and antimicrobial alternative and antimicrobial alternative,” Revista Científica de la Universidad Autónoma de Coahuila, vol. 5, no. 10, 2013.
View at: Google Scholar
E. Rodríguez-Sauceda and R. Ximhai, “Uso de agentes antimicrobianos naturales en la conservación de frutas y hortalizas,” Ra Ximhai, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 153–170, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Lima, C. Paiva de Sousa, C. Fernandez-Prada, J. Harel, J. D. Dubreuil, and E. L. de Souza, “A review of the current evidence of fruit phenolic compounds as potential antimicrobials against pathogenic bacteria,” Microbial Pathogenesis, vol. 130, pp. 259–270, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. N. H. Lauzardo, S. B. Baños, and M. G. V. del Valle, “Prospectiva de extractos vegetales para controlar enfermedades postcosecha hortofrutícolas,” Revista Fitotecnia Mexicana, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 119–123, 2007.
View at: Google Scholar
W. G. Sganzerla, G. B. Rosa, A. L. A. Ferreira et al., “Bioactive food packaging based on starch, citric pectin and functionalized with Acca sellowiana waste by-product: characterization and application in the postharvest conservation of apple,” International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, vol. 147, pp. 295–303, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. C. F. Ramírez and M. E. G. Robles, “Estudio De La Actividad Antimicrobiana De Extractos Vegetales Obtenidos A Partir De Hojas De Brássicas,” Jóvenes en La Ciencia, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 1933–1937, 2017.
View at: Google Scholar
S. Kharchoufi, L. Parafati, F. Licciardello et al., “Edible coatings incorporating pomegranate peel extract and biocontrol yeast to reduce Penicillium digitatum postharvest decay of oranges,” Food Microbiology, vol. 74, pp. 107–112, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. V. Vega, Enriquecimiento de la capacidad antioxidante y protección antimicrobiana del mango fresco cortado aplicando compuestos fenólicos de sus subproductos, Centro de investigación en alimentos y desarrollo, Tecnología de alimentos de origen vegetal, 2011.
A. Solís-Silva, A. Reyes-Munguía, G. Madariaga-Navarrete, R. G. Medina-Pérez, A. J. Campos-Montiel, and J. Cenobio-Galindo, “Evaluación de la actividad antifúngica y antioxidante de una nanoemulsión W/O de Opuntia oligacantha y aceite esencial de Citrus X sinensis,” Investigación y Desarrollo en Ciencia Y Tecnología de Alimentos, vol. 3, pp. 182–187, 2018.
View at: Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2021 Rafael Gomes-Araújo et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

1944

Downloads

1283

Citations