International Journal of Genomics

International Journal of Genomics / 2020 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2020 |Article ID 3781791 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/3781791

Maurizio Ricci, Rita Compagna, Bruno Amato, Sercan Kenanoglu, Dominika Veselenyiova, Danjela Kurti, Mirko Baglivo, Syed Hussain Basha, Roberta Serrani, Giacinto Abele Donato Miggiano, Barbara Aquilanti, Giuseppina Matera, Giuseppe Marceddu, Valeria Velluti, Lucilla Gagliardi, Munis Dundar, Juraj Krajcovic, Matteo Bertelli, "Mutations in the ARAP3 Gene in Three Families with Primary Lymphedema Negative for Mutations in Known Lymphedema-Associated Genes", International Journal of Genomics, vol. 2020, Article ID 3781791, 9 pages, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/3781791

Mutations in the ARAP3 Gene in Three Families with Primary Lymphedema Negative for Mutations in Known Lymphedema-Associated Genes

Academic Editor: Atsushi Kurabayashi
Received15 Apr 2020
Revised07 Jul 2020
Accepted01 Aug 2020
Published25 Aug 2020

Abstract

Background. ARAP3 is a small GTPase-activating protein regulator, which has important functions in lymphatic vessel organogenesis and modulation of cell adhesion and migration. Mutations in the ARAP3 gene are associated with impaired lymphatic vessel formation. Objective. The aim of our study was to determine the genotypes of lymphedema patients in relation to variants in the ARAP3 gene in order to explore its role in the development of lymphedema. Methods and Results. We applied next-generation sequencing to DNA samples of a cohort of 246 Italian patients with lymphatic malformations. When we tested probands for known lymphedema genes, 235 out of 246 were negative. Retrospectively, we tested the DNA of these 235 patients for new candidate lymphedema-associated genes, including ARAP3. Three out of 235 probands proved to carry rare missense heterozygous variants in ARAP3. In the case of two families, other family members were also tested and proved negative for the ARAP3 variant, besides being unaffected by lymphedema. According to in silico analysis, alterations due to these variants have a significant impact on the overall structure and stability of the resulting proteins. Conclusions. Based on our results, we propose that variants in ARAP3 could be included in genetic testing for lymphedema.

1. Introduction

ARAP3, also known as CENTD3 or DRAG1, is a GTPase-activating protein (GAP) encoded by the ARAP3 gene, which consists of 35 exons and maps to 5q31.3. ARAP3 has a multidomain structure, containing ArfGAP and RhoGAP domains, ankyrin repeats, and the pleckstrin homology domain 3 (PH3), and is therefore capable of phosphoinositide binding [1]. While the ArfGAP and RhoGAP domains work together to shape the cell cytoskeleton, PH3 facilitates cell signaling by binding to specific phosphoinositides [2].

ARAP3 was first identified for its capacity to bind phosphatidylinositol (3,4,5)-triphosphate (PIP3) in porcine leukocytes [3]. Its activity is controlled by PI3K (phosphoinositide 3-OH kinase), which regulates its catalytic activity and its localization in the cell, and by RAP-GTP, which controls its RhoGAP activity [3]. After activation by PI3K, ARAP3 undergoes translocation to the cell membrane, where its substrates RhoA-GTP and ARF6-GTP are located. ARAP3 depletion prevents its substrate GTPases from activating. In endothelial cells, this leads to changes in cell shape [4, 5].

The expression and function of ARAP3 have been studied in mice and zebrafish models [6] (Table 1). ARAP3 is irreplaceable in lymphatic vascular development, where it acts as a regulator of lymphatic vessel organogenesis and also modulates cell adhesion and migration. During embryo development, lymphatic vessels are formed by lymphangiogenesis from preexisting veins. Several molecular factors are crucial for the differentiation of endothelial cells into lymphatic endothelial cells (LECs) [7, 8]. The best known of these factors is VEGFR3 (vascular endothelial growth factor 3), which is important for the sprouting of precursor LECs that later become adult LECs [9]. ARAP3 seems to act downstream of VEGFR3 during lymphangiogenesis [6]. Depletion of ARAP3 in zebrafish leads to fewer precursor LECs sprouting from the cardinal vein, resulting in impaired lymphatic vessel formation. Despite the close link between lymphatic and blood vessel development, ARAP3-deficient zebrafish shows a normal blood vascular phenotype.


OrganismGeneFunctionLethalityLymphatic phenotype

MouseArap3Protein codingConditional Arap3 knockout lethal during gestation, impaired vascular development [10]Lymphatic anomalies, dysregulation of Arap3 in a mouse model of lymphatic disease [6]
Zebrafisharap3Protein coding/arap3 fewer precursor lymphatic endothelial cells sprout from the cardinal vein [6]

However, ARAP3-null mice show impaired blood vessel development as well as lymphatic system malformations and die prematurely [10]. ARAP3 dysregulation has also been reported in a mouse model of lymphatic diseases [6]. These findings provide evidence that ARAP3 is necessary for normal lymphangiogenesis during embryo development in mouse and zebrafish models.

The ARAP3 gene has not yet been associated with any pathological phenotype in OMIM, although its function is implicated in the lymphatic system. Several genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have been done to associate ARAP3 polymorphisms with different traits. Cerhan et al. investigated SNPs in multiple genes in the context of B-cell lymphoma. They performed a comprehensive meta-analysis and reported a single nucleotide ARAP3 variant rs79464052 associated with susceptibility for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma [11]. This type of lymphoma affects the lymphatic system and is characterized by fast growing lymph nodes deep in the body or in the peripheral lymph nodes. ARAP3 polymorphism is suspected to indicate susceptibility to this disease.

Lymphedema is a lymphatic system disorder that manifests as edema, usually affecting the extremities. Other symptoms involve inflammation, fat accumulation, and fibrosis [12]. Lymphedema is a progressive disease that develops due to impaired fluid flow caused by lymphatic system malformations. Lymphedema patients typically show excessive lymphangiogenesis, lymphatic vessel defects, and lymph node hypoplasia/hyperplasia [13].

The available data provides evidence that the ARAP3 gene is necessary for normal lymphatic system development. Although the details of its function are still uncertain and more studies are needed, the importance of its role in lymphangiogenesis is apparent.

We tested 235 Italian lymphedema patients, who had previously proved to be negative for variants in known lymphedema genes, for variants in ARAP3 [14]. We studied the genotype-phenotype relationship in patients carrying variants in ARAP3 in order to investigate whether ARAP3 could qualify as a candidate gene for lymphedema.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Clinical Evaluation

We retrospectively analyzed samples from 246 Caucasian patients diagnosed with primary lymphedema in hospitals across Italy. No consanguinity was reported in their families. Clinical diagnosis of lymphedema was according to generally approved clinical criteria. Genetic testing was performed on germline DNA extracted from the saliva or blood of probands.

2.2. Genetic Analysis

A custom-made oligonucleotide probe library was designed to capture all coding exons and flanking exon/intron boundaries (±15 bp) of 29 genes known to be associated with lymphedema. We added the candidate gene ARAP3 to our panel. Variants with likely clinical significance identified in DNA of probands were confirmed by bidirectional Sanger sequencing on a CEQ8800 Sequencer (Beckman Coulter).

We searched the international databases dbSNP (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/SNP/) and Human Gene Mutation Database professional (HGMD; http://www.biobase-international.com/product/hgmd) for all nucleotide changes. In silico evaluation of the pathogenicity of nucleotide changes in exons was performed using the Variant Effect Predictor tool (http://www.ensembl.org/Tools/VEP) and Varsome (http://www.varsome.com). Minor allele frequencies (MAF) were checked in the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD) (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/). All variants were evaluated according to the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics guidelines [15]. Detailed pretest genetic counseling was provided to all subjects, who were then invited to sign specific informed consent to use their anonymized genetic results for research.

2.3. In Silico Analysis

The primary amino acid sequence of ARAP3 in FASTA format (Figure 1) was used to search the Swiss-Model template library (SMTL) version 2019-10-24 and Protein Data Bank (PDB) released 2019-10-18 [16] with BLAST (Basic Local Alignment Search Tool) [17] and HHBlits [18] for evolution-related structures matching the given ARAP3 sequence. Models based on target-template alignment were built using ProMod3 of the Swiss-Model server [19]. Coordinates conserved between target and template were copied from the template to the model. Insertions and deletions were remodeled using a fragment library. Side chains were then rebuilt. Finally, the geometry of the resulting model was regularized using the CHARMM27 force field [20]. If loop modeling with ProMod3 failed, an alternative model was built with PROMOD-II [21]. Global and per-residue model quality was assessed using the QMEAN scoring function [22]. The BioVia Discovery Studio Visualizer v17.2 [23] was used to visualize the modeled protein, to mutate the targeted amino acids, and to analyze molecular level interactions.

3. Results

3.1. Clinical and Genetic Evaluation

In this study, we analyzed 235 patients for variants in the ARAP3 gene. These patients, diagnosed with lymphedema, were negative to genetic testing for variants in known lymphedema genes [14]. Three different heterozygous variants in ARAP3 were found in three probands. All cases were sporadic with no family history of lymphedema. In families 1 and 2, family members were also tested, but with a negative result. The ARAP3 variants we identified therefore do not segregate in the families. The clinical features of the probands are summarized in Table 2.


SexAgeClinical featuresAge of onsetFamily historyComputational predictionVariant nomenclature

M32Left lower limb and scrotal lymphedema25NoPathogenic predictions from FATHMM-MKL, MutationAssessor, and MutationTasterNM_022481.5:c.2054G>A
NP_071926.4:p.Cys685Tyr
F58Left lower limb lymphedema39NoPathogenic predictions from DANN and SIFTNM_022481.5:c.301G>A
NP_071926.4:p.Val101Met
M59Right lower limb edema, foot edema49NoNo pathogenic predictionsNM_022481.5:c.4433G>A
NP_071926.4:p.Arg1478Gln

The first proband is a male diagnosed with primary lymphedema at 25 years of age. The patient undergoes a clinical examination after an episode of lymphangitis in the left limb accompanied by fever. One week after the resolution of this episode, edema occurred in the left lower limb and scrotum. The proband carries a missense variant NP_071926.4:p.Cys685Tyr, not identified in dbSNP and with unknown allele frequency. Three unaffected family members were also tested, and they were all negative for the variant (Figure 2(a)), suggesting a de novo mutation.

The second proband is a female with left lower limb lymphedema, diagnosed at 39 years. The patient noticed heaviness and swelling of the left lower limb over the last 2 months. The left lower limb is swollen and shows the presence of pitting edema extending from the thigh down to the foot. She carries a missense variant NP_071926.4:p.Val101Met. This single nucleotide variant is known in dbSNP (rs200702800), and gnomAD lists its frequency as 0.00004. Three unaffected family members were tested and do not carry the variant (Figure 2(b)).

The third proband is a male with right lower limb and foot edema diagnosed at 49 years. The patient complains of progressive swelling of his right leg over the last 6 months. An episode of lymphangitis has been successfully cured. A missense single nucleotide variant was identified: NP_071926.4:p.Arg1478Gln, listed in dbSNP as rs147992246 with a reported frequency of 0.00202.

All the variants were confirmed by Sanger sequencing (Figure 3). Conservative analysis shows that the residues affected by the variants are preserved in the main mammalian models (Figure 4).

3.2. Template Selection and Model Building

Template search with BLAST and HHBlits was performed against the Swiss-Model template library (SMTL, last update: 2019-10-24, last included PDB release: 2019-10-18). The target sequence was sought with BLAST against the primary amino acid sequence (Figure 1) in the SMTL. A total of 697 templates were found that matched with various sequence identity and quality percentages. Details of the top 10 templates are shown in Table 3.


TemplateSeq identityOligo-stateQSQEFound byMethodResolutionSeq similarityCoverageDescription

3lju.1.A22.05MonomerHHblitsX-ray1.70 Å0.300.21ArfGAP with dual PH-domain-containing protein 1
3mdb.2.B21.82MonomerHHblitsX-ray2.95 Å0.300.21ArfGAP with dual PH-domain-containing protein 1
3feh.1.A22.05MonomerHHblitsX-ray1.90 Å0.300.21Centaurin-alpha-1
5jd0.1.A100.00MonomerBLASTX-ray2.30 Å0.600.13ArfGAP with RhoGAP domain, ANK repeat, and PH-domain-containing protein 3
3mdb.1.B21.82MonomerHHblitsX-ray2.95 Å0.300.21ArfGAP with dual PH-domain-containing protein 1
5jcp.1.A100.00MonomerBLASTX-ray2.10 Å0.600.13ArfGAP with RhoGAP domain, ANK repeat, and PH-domain-containing protein 3, linker, transforming protein RhoA
5jd0.1.A100.00MonomerHHblitsX-ray2.30 Å0.600.13ArfGAP with RhoGAP domain, ANK repeat, and PH-domain-containing protein 3
5jcp.1.A100.00MonomerHHblitsX-ray2.10 Å0.600.13ArfGAP with RhoGAP domain, ANK repeat, and PH-domain-containing protein 3, linker, transforming protein RhoA
5c5s.1.A27.41MonomerHHblitsX-ray2.20 Å0.340.13Unconventional myosin-IXb
5c5s.2.A27.41MonomerHHblitsX-ray2.20 Å0.340.13Unconventional myosin-IXb

3.3. In Silico Analysis

In silico analysis showed that the ARAP3 gene coded structure with Cys685 showed significant differences in interactions with Tyr685. This amino acid change causes a gain in interaction strength. While Cys685 formed two interactions with Ile682 and Arg690, Tyr685 shows five interactions: two direct hydrogen bonds with Trp662, Ile682, and Arg690 along with pi interactions with Leu658 and Ile682.

Based on the percentage of sequence identity, similarity, and best quality square, the 5jd0.1.A chain was selected to align the template and query sequences for model building. The model is shown in Figure 5. We then used the Discovery Studio Visualizer to generate the Cys685Tyr mutated version of the modeled structure. For lack of a template, the Arg1478Gln region was not modeled. The modeling of Val101Met was not possible due to limitation in the template region. Molecular level interactions between native/mutated residues and interacting residues are shown as snapshots in Figure 6. Details of the residues involved in interactions, the type of bonds they formed, and bond lengths in angstrom units are shown in Table 4.


S. no.MutationAmino acidMolecular interactions observedBond length in angstromsBond type

1Cys685TyrCys685Cys685:N-Ile682:O3.09H-bond
2Arg690:N-Cys685:O2.88H-bond
3Cys685-Arg6904.88Hydrophobic
4Tyr685Trp662:N-Tyr685:O2.14H-bond
5Trp662:C-Tyr685:O2.10H-bond
6Trp662:C-Tyr685:O1.80H-bond
7Tyr685:N-Ile682:O3.09H-bond
8Arg690:N-Tyr685:O2.88H-bond
9Tyr685-Leu6585.19Pi interaction
10Tyr685-Ile6825.37Pi interaction

4. Discussion and Conclusions

Lymphedema is a chronic disease caused by the accumulation of protein-rich interstitial fluid due to lymphatic system insufficiency associated with swelling, weight gain, tightness, and pain in the extremities [24]. It is a difficult condition to treat. Early diagnosis and treatment are important for disease management and to prevent complications. Correct diagnosis is crucial: identifying candidate genes can help patients and determine predisposition for lymphatic system malformations in the healthy population and family members of lymphedema patients.

In the study, we genotyped 246 Caucasian patients for variants in known genes associated with lymphedema; 235 tested negative, and their samples were further tested for variants in candidate genes including ARAP3.

We found three probands (3/235; 1.28%) with three different heterozygous missense single nucleotide variants in ARAP3. In family 1, the parents and a brother of the proband were also tested, but none of them carried the variant, suggesting that the variant arose de novo. In family 2, we tested the son, sister, and nephew of the proband. The variant was not identified in these family members; the parents of the proband were not tested. No family members of the third proband are available for analysis.

In silico analysis allows us to speculate that overall protein conformation is somehow altered by differences in interactions with nearby residues, leading to functional defects in the protein.

To the best of our knowledge, ARAP3 has never previously been implicated in the development of lymphedema in humans. Known associations between ARAP3 and the human phenotype are limited, coming only from GWAS focused on traits like birth weight, carcinogenesis, and neural development [11, 25, 26]. These studies have been inconclusive regarding ARAP3 function in these processes.

Studies on animal models have been more fruitful. As demonstrated in a mouse model of lymphatic diseases (HLT model: hypotrichosis-lymphedema-telangiectasia), ARAP3 is dysregulated in these disorders. This suggests that the normal function of ARAP3 is important in preventing lymphatic diseases. More evidence has been found in zebrafish, where ARAP3 is necessary for normal development of lymphatic vessels. Loss of ARAP3 function leads to a restricted number of LEC precursors that give rise to mature LECs. These findings strongly implicate ARAP3 in the correct development of the lymphatic system during embryogenesis. The work on animal models done by Kartopawiro et al. [6] is to our knowledge the only study directly connecting ARAP3 function with the anomalies of lymphatic system, so far. This shows how limited the information is about the role of ARAP3 in the development of lymphatics in experimental models as well as in humans. Our work implies that ARAP3 variants discussed here can cause anomalies of the lymphatics, and therefore, this work provides new evidence for the involvement of the ARAP3 gene in lymphatic system development.

This review of the literature and our results lead us to propose that ARAP3 may be important in normal lymphatic vascular formation in humans and can therefore determine a predisposition for lymphedema caused by lymphatic system malformations. We suggest including ARAP3 in the genetic testing for patients affected by lymphedema negative for known genes associated to the disease to confirm our results.

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are included within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

No competing financial interests exist.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Helen Ampt for English language editing. This work was supported by funding from the Provincia Autonoma di Trento within the initiative LP 6/99 (dgp 1045/2017).

References

  1. Y. Song, J. Jiang, S. Vermeren, and W. Tong, “ARAP3 functions in hematopoietic stem cells,” PLoS One, vol. 9, no. 12, pp. 1–21, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. M. A. Lemmon and K. M. Ferguson, “Signal-dependent membrane targeting by pleckstrin homology (PH) domains,” The Biochemical Journal, vol. 350, no. 1, pp. 1–18, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. S. Krugmann, K. E. Anderson, S. H. Ridley et al., “Identification of ARAP3, a novel PI3K effector regulating both Arf and Rho GTPases, by selective capture on phosphoinositide affinity matrices,” Molecular Cell, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 95–108, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. T. T. I. Stacey, Z. Nie, A. Stewart et al., “ARAP3 is transiently tyrosine phosphorylated in cells attaching to fibronectin and inhibits cell spreading in a RhoGAP-dependent manner,” Journal of Cell Science, vol. 117, no. 25, pp. 6071–6084, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. S. Krugmann, S. Andrews, L. Stephens, and P. T. Hawkins, “ARAP3 is essential for formation of lamellipodia after growth factor stimulation,” Journal of Cell Science, vol. 119, no. 3, pp. 425–432, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. J. Kartopawiro, N. I. Bower, T. Karnezis et al., “Arap3 is dysregulated in a mouse model of hypotrichosis-lymphedema-telangiectasia and regulates lymphatic vascular development,” Human Molecular Genetics, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 1286–1297, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. F. Stillo, V. Baraldini, P. Dalmonte et al., “Vascular anomalies guidelines by the Italian Society for the Study of Vascular Anomalies (SISAV),” International Angiology, vol. 34, Supplement 1, no. 2, p. 1, 2015. View at: Google Scholar
  8. G. Oliver and R. S. Srinivasan, “Endothelial cell plasticity: how to become and remain a lymphatic endothelial cell,” Development, vol. 137, no. 3, pp. 363–372, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. D. J. Dumont, L. Jussila, J. Taipale et al., “Cardiovascular failure in mouse embryos deficient in VEGF receptor-3,” Science, vol. 282, no. 5390, pp. 946–949, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. L. Gambardella, K. E. Anderson, C. Nussbaum et al., “The GTPase-activating protein ARAP3 regulates chemotaxis and adhesion-dependent processes in neutrophils,” Blood, vol. 118, no. 4, pp. 1087–1098, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. J. R. Cerhan, S. I. Berndt, J. Vijai et al., “Genome-wide association study identifies multiple susceptibility loci for diffuse large B cell lymphoma,” Nature Genetics, vol. 46, no. 11, pp. 1233–1238, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. S. Michelini, M. Cardone, P. Maltese, A. Bruson, A. Fiorentino, and M. Bertelli, “Primary lymphedema and genetic implications,” The EuroBiotech Journal, vol. 1, no. s2, pp. 144–146, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. N. Liu, “Truncular lymphatic malformation (LM): primary lymphedema,” in Congenital Vascular Malformations, Y.-W. Kim, B.-B. Lee, W. F. Yakes, and Y.-S. Do, Eds., pp. 121–128, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. S. Michelini, S. Paolacci, E. Manara et al., “Genetic tests in lymphatic vascular malformations and lymphedema,” Journal of Medical Genetics, vol. 55, no. 4, pp. 222–232, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. S. Richards, N. Aziz, S. Bale et al., “Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology,” Genetics in Medicine, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 405–423, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. H. M. Berman, J. Westbrook, Z. Feng et al., “The Protein Data Bank,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 235–242, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. C. Camacho, G. Coulouris, V. Avagyan et al., “BLAST+: architecture and applications,” BMC Bioinformatics, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 421–429, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. M. Remmert, A. Biegert, A. Hauser, and J. Söding, “HHblits: lightning-fast iterative protein sequence searching by HMM-HMM alignment,” Nature Methods, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 173–175, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. A. Waterhouse, M. Bertoni, S. Bienert et al., “SWISS-MODEL: homology modelling of protein structures and complexes,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 46, no. W1, pp. W296–W303, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. A. D. Mackerell, M. Feig, and C. L. Brooks, “Extending the treatment of backbone energetics in protein force fields: limitations of gas-phase quantum mechanics in reproducing protein conformational distributions in molecular dynamics simulations,” Journal of Computational Chemistry, vol. 25, no. 11, pp. 1400–1415, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. N. Guex, M. C. Peitsch, and T. Schwede, “Automated comparative protein structure modeling with SWISS-MODEL and Swiss-PdbViewer: a historical perspective,” Electrophoresis, vol. 30, SUPPL. 1, pp. S162–S173, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. P. Benkert, M. Biasini, and T. Schwede, “Toward the estimation of the absolute quality of individual protein structure models,” Bioinformatics, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 343–350, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. B. D. Studio, Dassault Systèmes BIOVIA. Discovery Studio Modeling Environment, 2016.
  24. Y. Yuan, V. Arcucci, S. M. Levy, and M. G. Achen, “Modulation of immunity by lymphatic dysfunction in lymphedema,” Frontiers in Immunology, vol. 10, pp. 1–6, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. N. M. Warrington, R. N. Beaumont, M. Horikoshi et al., “Maternal and fetal genetic effects on birth weight and their relevance to cardio-metabolic risk factors,” Nature Genetics, vol. 51, no. 5, pp. 804–814, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. C. Liu, A. T. Kraja, J. A. Smith et al., “Meta-analysis identifies common and rare variants influencing blood pressure and overlapping with metabolic trait loci,” Nature Genetics, vol. 48, no. 10, pp. 1162–1170, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2020 Maurizio Ricci et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder
Views377
Downloads338
Citations

Related articles

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.