International Journal of Polymer Science

International Journal of Polymer Science / 2021 / Article
Special Issue

Natural-Based Nanocomposites and their Biomedical Applications

View this Special Issue

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2021 |Article ID 5214510 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5214510

Quan Vo-An, Thuy Chinh Nguyen, Quang Tung Nguyen, Quoc Trung Vu, Cong Doanh Truong, Thi Len Nguyen, Thi Ngoc Lien Ly, Long Giang Bach, Hoang Thai, "Novel Nanoparticle Biomaterial of Alginate/Chitosan Loading Simultaneously Lovastatin and Ginsenoside RB1: Characteristics, Morphology, and Drug Release Study", International Journal of Polymer Science, vol. 2021, Article ID 5214510, 14 pages, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5214510

Novel Nanoparticle Biomaterial of Alginate/Chitosan Loading Simultaneously Lovastatin and Ginsenoside RB1: Characteristics, Morphology, and Drug Release Study

Academic Editor: Yuting Huang
Received08 Jun 2020
Revised04 Aug 2020
Accepted21 Aug 2020
Published16 Jan 2021

Abstract

Recently, plenty of interesting studies on improvement of bioavailability for poorly soluble drugs were implemented with different approaches such as using of combined biopolymers as a delivery system that allowed to enhancing drug solubility and bioavailability. In this work, alginate and chitosan were blended together in the form of polymeric particles, loaded with both lovastatin and ginsenoside Rb1 to producing the four-component nanoparticles by ionic gelation method. CaCl2 and sodium tripolyphosphate were used as gelation agent and cross-linking agent, respectively. The characteristics of obtained nanoparticles were studied by means of infrared spectra (IR), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), and dynamic light scattering (DLS). In combination, ginsenoside Rb1 and lovastatin both interacted with each other to improve the drug release ability of the polymer particles. The change of initial content of drugs in the nanoparticles has a negligible effect on the functional groups in the structure of the nanoparticles but has a significant impact on drug release process of both lovastatin and ginsenoside Rb1 from the nanoparticles in selective simulated body fluids. In addition, the synergistic interaction of lovastatin and ginsenoside Rb1 could be also observed through the modification of relative crystal degree and drug release efficiency.

1. Introduction

Alginate (AG) and chitosan (CS) are two common natural polymers with very diverse applications in different fields such as medical, pharmaceutical, food, beverage, and arts. AG is found in 265 generals of brown algae’s [1] as an organic acid with molecular weight of 32,000-200000 which was discovered by Stanford in the late 19th century [1, 2]. AG dissolves into water and forms a highly viscosity aqueous solution that is helpful for food preservation to enlarge the storage time while keeping the quality [38]. Moreover, AG has also been used in paper industry [9], biomedical applications [3, 10, 11], wound management [1214], and fiber industry [15] for its convenient-to-use, nontoxic characteristic.

Chitosan (CS), scientific name poly(1,4)-2-amino-2-deoxy-β-D-glucose or poly(1,4)-2-amino-2-deoxy-β-D-glucopyranose, is a deacetylate derivative of chitin—the second abundant polysaccharide in nature (after cellulose). It is also the second most popular biopolymer in the world [16] with large application in food industry [17, 18], agriculture [1921], cosmetic [18], water treatment technology [17, 18, 22], and biomedical materials and pharmaceuticals [2325]. Especially, CS is also a pivotal material in preparation glucosamine [26, 27].

The combination of these two abovementioned materials gives remarkable enhancement in antibacterial properties both for AG bandages as well as AG fibers while coming with CS [15]. Thus, the studies on fabricating and applying AG/CS polymer blend as material for loading drugs are now an attractive research direction.

Lovastatin (Lov) is a naturally occurring fermentation compound that was discovered in 1970. It was found in red yeast rice [28] and oyster mushrooms [29]. Lov inhibits cholesterol biosynthesis, reduces cholesterol in liver cells, and stimulates synthesis of LDL (low-density lipoprotein) receptors, thereby increasing LDL transport from blood to reduce plasma cholesterol levels. Thus, the prevention of cardiovascular diseases and treatment of dyslipidemia are main applications of Lov [30]. However, Lov has an average decomposition half-time approximately 3-4 hours, so patients have to take it several times a day to maintain the minimum drug level. To overcome this limitation, Lov is loaded into polymers that have the ability to control drug release through physical interactions between polymers and drug, decreasing number of drug using times. In the work on potential nanochitosan materials carrying Lov at different concentrations of CS, Shinde has figured out that Lov is absorbed by CS and the ability of drug loading decreases while increasing CS concentration. CS materials loading with Lov had shown its effectiveness in maintaining drug release for a long time [31]. Other studies on different drug-carrier polymer systems have also shown the same advantage in controlling drug release of these polymers [3237]. Our previous studies have been done by preparing and releasing Lov from AG/CS polymers in both film materials [38] and nanoparticles [39], in which, the size of AG/CS/Lov nanoparticles was 50-100 nm. The efficacy of Lov release control was evident in the later stages, and the Lov release process from AG/CS/Lov nanoparticles had the most suitable Korsmeyer-Peppas kinetic model with complex mechanism [39].

Panax notoginseng is a well-known folk medicinal herbal using for the treatment of hemostatic, hemoptysis, and hematoma for centuries in China, Vietnam, and other Asian countries [4044]. Over 200 chemical compounds have been isolated from the plant, but the main constituents are Panax notoginseng saponins (PNS) [39, 45]. Two major saponins as ginsenoside Rb1 and ginsenoside Rg1 have been identified from the PNS harvested in Vietnamese (Vietnamese Panax pseudoginseng). While ginsenoside Rg1 has stimulating effect on nerves system, antifatigue, improves brain work, ginsenoside Rb1 has the effect of inhibiting nerves center for sedation and deep sleep. In our previous study, a composite film combining AG/CS material and ginsenoside Rb1 had been made by solution method, and results that AG, CS, and ginsenoside Rb1 had strongly interacted to each other and created a polyelectrolyte complex [46].

In the recent work, the drug delivery polymer system of AG/CS polymer blend with 5 wt.% ginsenoside Rb1 and different Lov contents in film form was produced and studied. The results showed that Lov and ginsenoside Rb1 had a synergistic effect which affect on the morphology, properties, and drug release ability of these polymer films [45]. In preparation of AG/CS nanocomposites loading with Lov and ginsenoside Rb1 by ionic gelation method, the impact of both calcium chloride as a gel forming substance and sodium tripolyphosphate (STPP) as a cross-linking agent to the properties of blend polymer was also reported [47]; from those, the most suitable concentration of calcium chloride and STPP was found.

Unlike the 3-components of AG/CS nanocomposites loading only with either Lov or ginsenoside Rb1, the synergism between Lov and ginsenoside Rb1 and AG/CS clearly appeared in the 4-component composite while in film form. This synergistic effect improved both of the drug loading ability and the releasing efficiency, overcoming the disadvantages of the 3-component nanocomposite such as limitation of drug release only reach 80-85% [39]. That caused the large amount of used drugs to be wasted.

Combining between the excellent features of each component as well as the results of previous studies, the simultaneous load of ginsenoside Rb1 and Lov into the drug delivery polymer system of AG/CS has proved to give a better result to the drug release process from AG/CS/Lov/ginsenoside Rb1 composite in film form [45, 46].

In order to inherit and promote the before-mentioned advantages and aiming to enhance practical application, a 4-component composite system with small size has been fabricated to facilitating surface interaction between the components, leading improvement of drug loading capacity and drug release efficiency.

In this paper, novel nanoparticle biomaterial of AG/CS loading simultaneously Lov and ginsenoside Rb1 (NPB) is produced by ionic gelation method in favorable condition. The physical characteristics, morphology, drug loading efficiency, and drug release process of obtained NPB have been studied and discussed.

2. Experimental

2.1. Materials

Chitosan (CS) powder with deacetylation degree of 75%, sodium alginate powder (AG) with viscosity 300-500 mPa.s, lovastatin powder (Lov) with purity of 98.0%, and sodium tripolyphosphate (STPP) were commercial chemicals from Sigma-Aldrich. Ginsenoside Rb1 in white powder with the purity of 98% was extracted from Panax pseudoginseng and provided by National Institute of Medicinal Materials, Vietnam. Other analytical grade chemicals and solvents are ethanol, acetic acid 1%, and calcium chloride (CaCl2).

2.2. Preparation of AG/CS/LOV/Ginsenoside Rb1 Nanoparticle Biomaterials (NPB) by Ionic Gelation Method

An ionic gelation method with CaCl2 gelation agent and STPP cross-linking agent has been used for the procedure of nanoscale to microscale polymer granulars. This technique is favorable because of simple preparation in aqueous solution. The gelation process was conducted basing on the polymer characteristic to establishing cross-linking bonds in the presence of ions, resulting in the formation of nanoparticles. In this method, CS has been dissolved in acetic acid solution to obtain CS cation. Afterward, the cation solution has been added slowly under continuous stirring into an AG solution containing STPP. Due to the interaction between the opposite charges, AG/CS undergoes cross-linking and gel-ionization, then precipitates to forming spherical particles. This NPB was remarkably effective to enhance health and immunity and may reduce blood cholesterol concentration and treat cardiovascular disease in patients.

2.3. Preparation of NPB with Varied Lov and Ginsenoside Rb1 Content

The preparation process is similar to the production of 4-component AG/CS/Lov/ginsenoside Rb1 with a selected concentration of CaCl2 of 0.002 M. The Lov content ranges from 0 wt.%, 10 wt.%, 15 wt.%, to 20 wt.% (in comparison to the total mass of AG and CS); AG/CS/ginsenoside Rb1 ratio is 1 : 1 : 5 wt.%, ginsenoside Rb1 content ranging from 0 to 5 wt.%. Table 1 presents the composition and label of the different NPB samples.


Samples label—RxLy (ratio of initial content of ginsenoside Rb1 and Lov in NPB)Lov initial content (wt.%)
05101520

Ginsenoside Rb1 initial content (wt.%)0%R0L10
1%R1L10
3%R3L10
5%R5L0R5L5R5L10R5L15R5L20

The calculated CS, AG, Lov, and ginsenoside Rb1 were dissolved in acetic acid 1% solution, distilled water, and ethanol 99%, respectively. An STPP solution of 0.83 g/L and CaCl2 aqueous 0.002 M solution were also prepared.

After obtaining the above solution, mixing the STTP and CaCl2 solutions and stirring in high speed ultrasonic equipment at 20,000 rpm to increase the dispersion of the substances.

Gradually pour Lov solution to ginsenoside Rb1 and stir with high speed ultrasonic until reaching homogeneous mixture. Next, slowly drop the obtained STTP and CaCl2 solutions into the Lov and ginsenoside Rb1 mixture and keep stirring to produce the mixture of drug.

The loading process of drug into the AG/CS mixture was performed by slowly add the mixture of drug to the mixture of AG and CS solutions, with dripping rate at 3 mL/min and keep stirring on high speed ultrasonic stirrer for 30 min.

The final product was then collected after going through the two stages of solvent removal, centrifugation, and freeze-dry. The FreeZone 2.5 (Labconco, USA) was used as a freeze-dried equipment to evaporate completely the remaining solvent out of the materials. It was then minced into fine powder and stored in a cool, dry place before use.

2.4. Standard Curve of Lov and Ginsenoside Rb1 in Different pH Solutions and in Ethanol
2.4.1. Standard Curve of Lovastatin and Ginsenoside Rb1 in Buffer and in Ethanol

The standard curve and regression coefficients of Lov and ginsenoside Rb1 in different pH solutions (pH 2 and pH 7.4) and in ethanol are established based on the data from the UV-Vis spectra. The Lov or ginsenoside Rb1 was dissolved in buffer or ethanol solution and stirred and measured the UV spectra data of each solution with different concentrations. The standard curve equations and linear regression coefficients (2) were then calculated, in which and according to the optical absorbance (A) and concentration (C) of Lov and ginsenoside Rb1 (Table 2).


DrugsMediumParameters of standard curve equation of drugs
Standard curve equation2 (nm)

LovpH 20.996229.97
pH 7.40.996239.15
Ethanol0.993245.55

Ginsenoside Rb1pH 20.996219.52
pH 7.40.996219.00
Ethanol0.991213.55

The regression coefficients of the standard curve equations presented in Table 2 are about ~1, which should be used to determine the efficiency of the Lov and ginsenoside carrying as well as their content released from the NPB.

2.4.2. Determination of Lov and Ginsenoside Loading Efficiency

As opposed to the Lov and ginsenoside loading process, their release process has been carried out by putting a certain amount of Lov or ginsenoside Rb1 loaded nanoparticle into ethanol solution and stirring well for 24 hours. An exact volume of the solution was filtered and used to determining the optical density of Lov and ginsenoside Rb1. This data was used to comparing and calculating based on the standard curves of Lov and ginsenoside Rb1 in ethanol to obtain the loading efficiency of Lov and ginsenoside Rb1 in NPB samples.

2.4.3. Evaluation of Lov and Ginsenoside Rb1 Release Process from NPB

The experiments of Lov and ginsenoside Rb1 release from NPB were conducted in the buffer solution at pH 2 and pH 7.4. A certain amount of the drug loading nanoparticle was taken into buffer at 37°C while continuously stirred at 20,000 rpm. After every hour, a certain volume of the solution was taken to filter and recorded UV data of Lov and ginsenoside Rb1 concentration. An equivalent amount of fresh buffer solution had been added to maintain the initial volume. Similar procedure was then repeated until finishing 32 testing hours.

The amount of Lov and ginsenoside Rb1 released from NPB was calculated in corresponding to the standard curve equation of Lov and ginsenoside Rb1 in buffer solution at pH 2 and pH 7.4. With each of Lov and ginsenoside Rb1, the percentage of them released at a time () is calculated by the following formula:

where C(0) is the initial amount of loaded Lov or ginsenoside Rb1 and C(t) is the amount of Lov or ginsenoside Rb1 released at a time ().

2.5. Morphology and Characteristics of NPB
2.5.1. FTIR Spectra

Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) spectra of AG, CS, Lov, ginsenoside Rb1, and drug-loading nanoparticles were recorded on a Nicolet iS10 spectrometer (Thermo Scientific, USA) at room temperature by 32 scans with 8 cm-1 resolution and wavenumber ranging from 400 to 4000 cm-1.

2.5.2. Scanning Electron Nanoscopy (SEM)

SEM images of the NPB were taken on a FESEM S4800 device (Hitachi, Japan) with magnification from 1000 times to 200000 times. The samples were coated with Pt to improve the conductivity of materials.

2.6. Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC)

Schematic DSC curves of the NPB were measured on DSC-60 (Shimadzu, Japan) with heating condition from room temperature to 400°C, heat rate at 10°C/min in gaseous nitrogen.

2.6.1. Dynamic Light Scattering (DLS)

The Zetasizer SZ-100 equipment was used to determine particle size of NPB at 25°C, with measuring range from 0.1 to 10000 nm. The NPB was dispersed in distilled water before recording the size distribution diagram.

2.6.2. Ultraviolet–Visible Spectroscopy (UV-VIS)

The UV-Vis spectrometer (Cintra 40, GBC, USA) was used to determine the loading efficiency and concentration of Lov, ginsenoside Rb1 released from the NPB in different pH solutions and in ethanol.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. FTIR Spectra of NPB

The FTIR spectra of AG, CS, Lov, and ginsenoside Rb1 are presented in Figure 1. Characterized bands of functional groups in AG are listed as follows: stretching C-H bonding at 2923.65 cm-1; C=O group at 1626.64 cm-1; C-O-C bending vibration at 1096.95 cm-1 and 1032.1 cm-1; and the saccharide ring vibrations at 947.86 cm-1, 891.80 cm-1, and 824.34 cm-1. A broad band at 3448.16 cm-1 represents the stretching vibrations of -OH group in AG macromolecule.

In the FTIR spectrum of CS, the characteristic peaks of –CH and C-O groups are at 2883.51 cm-1 and 1082.75 cm-1; a broad peak at 3447.62 cm-1 attributed to -OH and -NH2 groups and amide group at 1598.29 cm-1 which is assigned for –NH2 group; other peaks also appear at 895.17 cm-1 for saccharide ring vibration in CS and at 1651.26 cm-1 for C=O stretching.

In the FTIR spectrum of ginsenoside Rb1, the broad band at 3423.35 cm-1 represents for –OH stretching vibration and 2937.96 cm-1 and 2941.92 cm-1 band for CH2 and CH stretching. The stretching vibration of C=C bonding appeared in 1640.73 cm-1 band. The absorption band at 1077.79 cm-1 is for C-O-C stretching and the –OH bending vibration at 1364.06 cm-1 band.

The IR spectrum of pure Lov has characterized groups such as –OH stretching vibration at 3640.99 cm-1; the stretching vibration of C-H bonding in -CH3, -CH2-, and -CH- appeared in three bands at 2966 cm-1, 2929 cm-1, and 2867 cm-1; and –C=O stretching vibration of saturated lactones at 1728.02 cm-1. The absorption band at 1696 cm-1 characterized for the stretching vibration of C=C bonding of Lov, and the 1701.11 cm-1 band is due to C=O group in the Lov structure. The C-O-C stretching is at 1074.50 cm-1.

The similarity has been found in the FTIR spectrum of other NPB-RxLy in comparison with the R5L10 sample (Figures 2 and 3). Thus, only the above characterized peaks of functional groups in the samples have been listed in Table 3.


SampleWavenumber (cm-1)

Alginat (AG)3448.162923.651626.64_1096.95
Chitosan (CS)3447.622883.51_1598.291081
Lovastatin (Lov)3640.992966.061728.11_1077.79
Ginsenoside Rb13423.352941.921077.791451.911070
R5L03451.512928.311627.431414.171089.41
R0L103443.162928.371621.101416.301090.57
R3L103440.532931.391619.981415.551033.70
R5L103426.962931.391616.121415.551091.56
R5L203441.662968.621628.841535.361075.37

The results of FTIR analysis of NPB-RxLy show that the peak position of the characterized groups in AG, CS, Lov, and ginsenoside Rb1 has shifted slightly due to the mutual interaction between the characteristic groups in AG, CS, Lov, and ginsenoside Rb1 (polymer-polymer, polymer-drug, and drug-drug interactions). Following the FTIR spectra, the position of functional groups of 4 components in the NPB was a negligible change as adding or raising Lov’s content while the intensity of these bands had varied. Thus, when using STPP as cross-linking agent, the band of the characterized groups in the NPB is significantly shifted; it might due to the better interaction and mixing of the components in NPB.

3.2. Morphology of NPB

FESEM images of Lov and ginsenoside Rb1 are displayed in Figure 4. Lov structure has a rod-shaped, irregular size about 20 μm–30 μm, and ginsenoside Rb1 has granular type with irregular size about 10 μm-15 μm.

In Figure 5(f), in the NPB-R0L10 sample (without Rb1), the size of the collected particles is relatively large; phase separation appeared; the Lov rod dispersed unevenly with 1.5 μm size and agglomerated into cluster, while the initial size of Lov rod is about 20-30 μm. Thus, just only loading in AG/CS, combined with a fabrication method with STPP as a cross-linking agent and high-speed ultrasonic stirring, the Lov rod sizes have been reshaped into much smaller. With 5% ginsenoside Rb1 (R5Ly), the rod/particle size of Lov in 4-component NPBs has been significantly reduced but still not evenly dispersed into the AG/CS polymer blend, resulting in the size of about 200 nm-1 μm observed. From Figures 5(b)5(e), as the Lov content increases, it seems that the impact of drug-drug interaction exceeds the polymer-drug interaction, and the drug tends to agglomerate to form larger size rods/particles.

Figures 6(a) and 6(b) show the SEM image of R0L10 surface at magnifications of 10,000 times and 30,000 times. The polymer particles appeared with relatively large size and heavy rough surface; the Lov rod was 1.5 μm size and agglomerated together, much smaller in comparison with the size of pure Lov rod (Figure 4) ranging from 20 μm to 30 μm.

Figures 6(c) and 6(d) present SEM image of NPB with 1 wt.% ginsenoside Rb1 (R1L10 sample). The sizes of dispersed Lov rods are from 0.5 to 1 μm, and the particles are observed to be detached with each other. With the presence of ginsenoside Rb1, the Lov tends to have better dispersion in AG/CS polymer particles.

In Figures 6(e) and 6(f), the SEM image of R3L10 using 3 wt.% ginsenoside Rb1, the Lov rods have been covered with a polymer layer (brighter part surrounds the particles). Lov is better dispersed into AG/CS polymer blend in the size of 100-300 nm. With 5 wt.% Rb1 content (Figures 6(g) and 6(h)), the Lov rods tend to agglomerate together and form larger particles, about 200 nm-1 μm.

It is very likely that the increase in ginsenoside Rb1 content also increases the internal molecular linkage between ginsenoside Rb1 molecules, thus, leading to the aggregation of ginsenoside Rb1 particles, reducing their size stability of ginsenoside Rb1, and generating uneven structure in the NPB. Therefore, in addition to its biological activities, ginsenoside Rb1 might act as size stabilizer in NPBs through dipole-dipole interactions and hydrogen bonding [45, 46].

3.3. Thermal Characteristics of AG, CS, Lov, Ginsenoside Rb1, and NPB

DSC diagrams of NPB with 10% Lov (R0L10) and 5% ginsenoside Rb1 (R5L0) are presented in Figure 7. Figure 8(a) presents DSC diagrams of R5Ly group with a fixed content of 5 wt.% ginsenoside Rb1. And Figure 8(b) presents DSC diagrams of RxL10 NPB group with 10% Lov. The endothermic peak temperatures and exothermic peak temperatures of AG, CS, Lov, ginsenoside Rb1, and NPBs are listed in Table 4.


Samples1st endothermic peak temperature (°C)1st exothermic peak temperature (°C)2nd endothermic peak temperature (°C)

AG119.70238.90
CS106.80
Lov174.60264.70
Rb198.90230.40
R5L089.51214.63
R5L5101.14174.81218.65
R5L1077.35173.47219.31
R5L1591.38172.54219.31
R5L2093.04173.89217.58
R0L1073.24172.14221.74
R1L1082.11171.72219.75
R3L1076.51172.05219.67

In Figure 7, the R5L0 sample has its two endothermic peaks at 89.51°C and 214.63°C corresponding to the dehydration and melting of AG and CS in NPB. For the R0L10 sample, two endothermic peaks located at 73.24°C and 221.74°C were also attributed to the dehydration and melting temperature of AG and CS. Moreover, one exothermic peak at 172°C can be assigned to the decomposition of STPP in the sample. Due to the forming a eutectic system between ginsenoside Rb1 or Lov, CS, and AG, the melting temperature of the NPB was decreased significantly as compared to the single component.

In the DSC diagrams of the R5Ly group (Figures 8(a) and 8(b)), the two endothermic peaks appeared because of the dehydration process at the temperature under 100°C and melting process of components in the samples at the temperature around 210°C. Other two exothermic peaks are assigned for the decomposition of STPP cross-linking agent at the temperature about 174°C and the decomposition of AG, Lov, and ginsenoside Rb1 at the temperature above 300°C. For the R5L5 sample, the positions of two endothermic peaks at 101.14°C and 218.65°C and one exothermic peak at 174.81°C are slightly shifted in comparison with provided DSC peaks of AG, CS, Lov, and the 3-components R5L0 and R0L10 (Table 4). This result showed that the changes of initial Lov content or ginsenoside Rb1 content have a significant effect on phase transition of the NPB samples. In this case, due to synergistic effect, all the recorded DSC peaks of 4-component NPBs are broader and more flattened (Figures 8(a) and 8(b)).

3.4. Particle Size, Zeta Potential, and Polydispersity Index of NPBs

Dynamic light scattering (DLS) method has been used to measure particle size of materials with dispersed medium of distilled water. The particle size distribution diagram of NPB-R5Ly samples is shown in Figure 9, and the average particle size of the NPB is displayed in Table 5. Most of the NPB samples have more than 2 particle size ranges; the average particle size of those samples are taken to the peak with highest intensity value.


SampleParticle size range (nm)Major particle sizePeak width () (nm)Polydispersity index (PDI)Average particle size (nm)
Nm ()%

R5L043.82-82528595.1138.20.470
4145-640052724.9426.7

R5L5190.1-396.1270.5100.037.470.460

R5L1060–90.158.431.510.360.346
95–1050333.593.6159.5
3850-55605118.04.9537

R5L1543.82-190.176.867.214.520.595
190.1-1718405.090.5238.5
4801-64395560.02.30.00006

R5L20122.4-396.1204.528.052.360.554
458.7-35801405.072.0559.2

R0L10480-1053586.8100123.70.483

R1L1076-15078.25.79.7830.530
250-800369.194.376.92

R3L1095-950328.597.5136.90.276
4000-650052742.5424.6

R5L1055-9058.41.510.360.346
90-1050333.593.6158.5
4500-850051184.9537

From the collected results, the R5L5 has a smaller and more uniform particle size than others; from 190.1 to 396.1 nm with the average particle size is with an intensity of 100.0%. This result can be explained by the significant role of ginsenoside Rb1 which acts as a particle size stabilizer in the NPB group. With the appropriate Lov content and the presence of Rb1, based on the interaction between ginsenoside Rb1 with AG, CS, and Lov, the Lov rods disperse more evenly into the AG/CS polymer blend.

Figure 10 and Table 5 show the result of particle size distribution diagram of the NPB group with fixed Lov content and altered ginsenoside Rb1 content. The average particle size of samples is reduced from of R0L10, of R1L10, of R3L10, and of R5L10. So, while increasing ginsenoside Rb1 content, the average particle size of NPB reduces.

In terms of NPB’s particle size, in comparison between FESEM and DLS methods, these values differ between the two methods because in DLS, the particles are dispersed in distilled water; thus, obtained results are much smaller than the FESEM method.

The polydispersity index (PI) which indicates the uniformity of nanoparticles is used to evaluate the heterogeneity of a sample based on size. In accordance with ISO standards (ISO 22,412 : 2017), are more common to monodisperse samples, while are common to a broad size (e.g., polydisperse) distribution of particles [48]. With the low PDI value mainly ranges from 0.276 to 0.470, most of the NPBs were found to be stable and monodisperse in nature. The greater PDI values of 0.530-0.595 found in some NPB samples which have broader particle size.

In nano-drug delivery systems, zeta potential/surface charge (ZP) of polymeric particles is an important parameter; it causes major impacts on the various properties of drug delivery polymer particles, for both the stability of the nanoparticles and the rate of drug release. The high absolute value of ZP implies larger repulsive forces between particles, causing difficulty in agglomeration and thus facilitates redispersion of the particles [49]. The ZP values of R0L10, R5L0, R5L10, and R5L20 are -51.3, -23.9, -26.4, and 9.41 mV, respectively. It could be seen that the ZP value of R5L20 is lowest at 9.41 mV. The low ZP value indicates the low resultant repulsion to each other and fast aggregation that consists with the highest particle size of R5L20 sample. In case of the more agglomeration, the higher molecular weight, which steric stabilisation will prevail, a reduction of the measured zeta potential appeared. Hence, despite the low ZP value, the stability of R5L20 is sufficient.

While absolute ZP values above 30 mV provide good stability and above 60 mV excellent stability for nanoparticles, the stability of R0L10 is excellent, and of R5L0 and R5L10 are considered as good. This might be the result of the firm rod-shape structure of Lov while appearing on the surface of the NPB, leading to the bigger size but stable of the nanoparticle; the higher Lov content, the higher the particle size.

With the presence of Rb1 in NPBs, the particle size is reduced due to the involvement of amorphous structure of Rb1 together with Lov, which could be seen while taking into account the R0L10 and R5L10 samples. ZP values of the two samples indicate the R0L10 is the most stable nanoparticle system.

3.5. Loading Efficiency of Lov and Ginsenoside Rb1 by AG/CS Polymer Blend

The loading efficiency of Lov and ginsenoside Rb1 by AG/CS polymer blend with different initial content of Lov and ginsenoside Rb1 is shown in Table 6. It could be seen that the Lov loading efficiency of the R5Ly group is a bit lower than in the RxL10 group. The highest Lov loading efficiency appeared in the R5L20 sample (78.59%). For ginsenoside Rb1 loading efficiency, the RxL10 group has a higher result of 71.22%, 76.8%, and 73.31%, respectively. From both results, the initial content of ginsenoside Rb1 in NPB has a major impact on Lov and ginsenoside Rb1 loading efficiency.


SampleDrug loading efficiency (%)
LOVGinsenoside Rb1

R5L065.47
R5L539.2564.21
R5L1070.6473.31
R5L1557.6361.35
R5L2078.5961.87
R0L1062.81
R1L1061.3871.22
R3L1077.6976.8

3.6. Release of Lov and Ginsenoside Rb1 from NPB Samples in Different pH Solutions
3.6.1. Influence of pH of Solution on Lov and Ginsenoside Rb1 Released Content from R5L10 Samples

Based on the calculated results of drug release percentage, Lov release process from the R5L10 in both pH 2 and pH 7.4 aqueous solutions over experiment time has taken place in 2 stages; the release of Lov content has increased significantly during the first 10 hours (about 80 wt.%) and reached a stable value in later stage. It is reasonable because at the first stage, at the surface of NPB or closely to the surface, Lov is loaded or attached at high content; thus, it is allowed to quickly be released and strongly dispersed into testing medium. In the next stage, Lov rods/particles are trapped deep inside the structure of the NPB and would be harder to access and diffuse outside in different pH solutions. Moreover, the external solutions are also facing more difficulty to penetrate the grain structure of the NPB due to the swelling, hydrolysis of AG and CS. The pH of the testing medium influences significantly on the Lov content released from the R5L10 sample (Figure 11). In more detail, after 32 hours, the Lov content released from the NPB in pH 2 solution is 96.99%, while in pH 7.4 solution, it reaches 99.15%. The released Lov content from NPB in pH 2 solution is lower than in pH 7.4 solution because a portion of hydroxyl group in the released Lov reacts with H+ ions in the acid, thus, reducing solubility of Lov in the acid solution. This is consistent with the previous findings in biomedical that Lov is poorly absorbed in the stomach, where the pH is low. Besides that, the H+ ions also react with the amino groups of CS on the surface of the NPB, preventing Lov to diffuse into the solution [33, 34]. These results demonstrate that the drug-loading polymer particles are more suitable for the neutral environment of the large intestine and rectum mucosa than in acidic environment.

The similar tendency is observed in Figure 11 for the ginsenoside Rb1 released content from NPB. In pH 2 solution, the released content of Rb1 increases and reaches 93.60% for the first 10 hours and remains stable up to 95.36% after 32 hours. In pH 7.4 solution, this value more quickly reaches 96.30% within 8 hours and 99.19% after 32 hours, respectively. In neutral environment, the released rate of Rb1 is higher and more stable than in acid environment because the H+ ions react with the amino group of CS on the surface, reducing diffusion ability of ginsenoside Rb1 into the acid. Thus, it is possible to conclude that the pH of the environment significantly affects the released rate of Rb1.

3.6.2. Influence of Initial Lov Content on Lov Content Released from NPB Samples

Figure 12 presents the percentage of Lov released from the NPB–R5Ly samples over time in pH 2 and pH 7.4 solutions. Better Lov content released results received with lower initial Lov content among the R5Ly group for the whole experiments in pH 2 with the highest Lov released rate appeared in R5L5 and R5L10 (Figure 12). Might the small particle size help to increase the contact of NPB particles with the solution; therefore, the drug is more easily to dissolve into solutions. Moreover, at appropriate initial content, the strong interaction between Rb1 and Lov also causes a synergistic impact in drug release rate.

In pH 7.4 solution, the released rate of Lov content is quite similar in the R5Ly group. The difference appeared mainly from 7 to 12 hours, of which, the R5L10 and R5L20 have a bit higher rate than R5L5 and R5L15. This result may be explained by burst release of drugs located on the surface and near the surface of particles at the high content of the drug in neutral environment.

3.6.3. Influence of Initial Lov Content on Ginsenoside Rb1 Content Released from NPB Samples

The dependence of initial Lov content on the percentage of ginsenoside Rb1 released from the R5Ly group over time in pH 2 and pH 7.4 solutions is shown in Figure 13.

At both pH solutions, contrary to the trend of Lov release rate, the ginsenoside Rb1 released rate is quite similar at pH 2 and much different at pH 7.4 in all of the R5Ly group. At pH 2, the R5L10 sample has the highest release rate for the first 10 testing hours compared with others; for the rest timing, it has kept a slight change from 1 to 2%, also similar to others. Thus, the ginsenoside Rb1 content released from the NPB in pH 2 solution is not significantly affected by initial Lov content. In pH 7.4 solution, the ginsenoside Rb1 released rate takes longer time to reach its maximum value (12 hours of experiment) in most of the R5Ly samples; thus, it was still highly impacted by the initial Lov content. The highest result is obtained in the R5L10 sample. This can be explained by the strong interaction of ginsenoside Rb1 and Lov with polymers which can impact the dispersed phase in polymer matrix and particle size of obtained NPB samples.

This result again reaffirms that ginsenoside Rb1 plays the role as a structural stabilizer, enhancing dispersion and mixing between AG, CS, Lov, and ginsenoside Rb1 as well as itself release ability from the NPB in pH 7.4 solution.

3.6.4. Influence of Initial Ginsenoside Rb1 Content on Lov Content Released from NPB Samples

Figure 14 describes the Lov content released rate from the RxL10 group over time in pH 2 and pH 7.4 solutions. In both cases, during the 8 first hours, Lov content released from the NPB–RxL10 samples is increased sharply (over 90%), then remains in both of the above solutions. According to the shape of the curves and the values of Lov content released rate, similarity has been found for both of pH. In both of pH, the variation of Lov content released from the NPB is quite the same over time. Hence, the change of initial ginsenoside Rb1 content has a small impact on the Lov released rate in the RxL10 group.

3.6.5. Statistical Evaluation within NPB Groups

Statistical calculation result with Student’s -test for data on Figure 12 shows that in the early stage of drug released process, within first 3 hours, the difference of released Lov content between R5Ly samples in pH 2 is highly significant different with those in pH 7.4 in comparing with the chosen level of significance , with value ranges from 0.001 to 0.006, reaching different level at 99-99.8%. In the second stage of Lov released process, from 4 to 8 hours, the different level is decreased with higher value ranges from 0.054 to 0.168, with the confidence level of 70-90%. For the rest period, with , Lov release percentage is quite similar within the R5Ly samples.

For the released Rb1 content (Figure 13), the R5Ly group has shown its very highly significant different level in -student comparison from the period of 6-11 hours of experiments. During that period, the calculated value reached 0.004–0.025, with the reliability of evaluation being in the range of 99.8-99.9%. From the first 1-5 hours, the calculated value is in the range of 0.111–0.293, with the confidence level of 90–98%; the different level is highly significant. The rest timing of experiments is from 12 to 32 hours with , with lower but still being considered as good enough to support a conclusion of Rb1 released content between the two pHs is at significantly different levels, reaching 90-95%.

Hence, Lov released content and Rb1 released content of the R5Ly groups are not similar over the same period of experiment timing in each pH of experiments.

In overall, for every NPB sample, when adding an amount of ginsenoside Rb1 to the AG/CS/Lov particles, the Lov content released from the NPB sample is increased in both pH 2 and pH 7.4 solutions. In acidic environment, the released Lov content is lower than in neutral environment. Following the results, it could be suggested that 4-component NPB is suitable for use in the environment of intestinal and gastric fluid in human.

4. Conclusions

The novel nanoparticle biomaterials (NPB) of alginate/chitosan (AG/CS) polymer blend loading simultaneously lovastatin (Lov) and ginsenoside Rb1 were successfully fabricated by ionic gelation method using CaCl2 and sodium tripolyphosphate as gelation agent and cross-linking agent, respectively. The results of FTIR analysis of NPB samples using different Lov and ginsenoside Rb1 content show that the peak position of the characterized groups in AG, CS, Lov, and ginsenoside Rb1 has shifted slightly due to the mutual interaction such as dipole-dipole interactions and hydrogen bonding between the characteristic groups in AG, CS, Lov, and ginsenoside Rb1. As a particle size stabilizer for AG/CS/Lov particles, ginsenoside Rb1 contributes to dispersing Lov rods more regularly into the AG/CS polymer blend. Among the investigated NPB samples, the NPB with AG/CS ratio of 1/1 (wt./wt.), 5 wt.% Lov and 5 wt.% ginsenoside Rb1 (R5L5) sample has a particle size in the range from 190.1 to 396.1 nm; the average particle size is with an intensity of 100.0%. Zeta potential values indicate the excellent stability of R0L10 and good stability of R5L0 and R5L10 which means the 4-components with 5 wt.% Rb1 and 10 wt.% Lov content is the decent stable nanoparticle system. The Lov release process from the NPB samples in both pH 2 and pH 7.4 solutions according to testing time includes 2 stages, quick release for the first testing 10 hours, then slow release to stable value. Similarly, the ginsenoside Rb1 release process from the NPB samples in both pH 2 and pH 7.4 solutions also includes 2 stages, quick release for the first testing 7 hours, then slow down to a stable value. The release of Lov and ginsenoside Rb1 content from the NPB samples in pH 2 solution is lower than in pH 7.4 solution with the same components of NPB samples and testing time.

Data Availability

Data availability statement is included in the paper content.

Conflicts of Interest

There are no conflicts to declare.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the National Foundation for Science and Technology Development in Vietnam for financial support (subject code 104.02-2017.17, period of 2017–2020).

References

  1. W. Paul and C. P. Sharma, “Alginates: wound dressings,” in Encyclopedia of Biomedical Polymers and Polymeric Biomaterials, 2015. View at: Google Scholar
  2. E. C. Stanford, “Improvements in the manufacture of useful products from seaweeds,” Tech. Rep. 142, British patent, 1881. View at: Google Scholar
  3. K. Y. Lee and D. J. Mooney, “Alginate: properties and biomedical applications,” Progress in Polymer Science, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 106–126, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. W. Sabra and W.-D. Deckwer, Alginate-A Polysaccharide of Industrial Interest and Diverse Biological Functions, in Polysaccharides—Structural Diversity and Functional Versatility, Marcel Dekker, New York, 2nd edition, 2005.
  5. Y. Pranoto, V. M. Salokhe, and S. K. Rakshit, “Physical and antibacte rial properties of alginate-based edible film incorporated with garlic oil,” Food Research International, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 267–272, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. K. Norajit and G. H. Ryu, “Preparation and properties of antibacterial alginate films incorporating extruded white ginseng extract,” Journal of Food Processing and Preservation, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 387–393, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. A. Mohammed Fayaz, “Mycobased synthesis of silver nanoparticles and their incorporation into sodium alginate films for vegetable and fruit preservation,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 57, no. 14, pp. 6246–6252, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. A. Concha-Meyer, R. Schöbitz, C. Brito, and R. Fuentes, “Lactic acid bacteria in an alginate film inhibit Listeria monocytogenes_ growth on smoked salmon,” Food Control, vol. 22, no. 3-4, pp. 485–489, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. M. Joyce, R. Gilbert, and S. Khan, “Effect of Ca++ ions on the water retention of alginate in paper coatings,” Journal of Pulp and Paper Science, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. J126–J130, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
  10. A. Hambleton, F. Debeaufort, A. Bonnotte, and A. Voilley, “Influence of alginate emulsion-based films structure on its barrier properties and on the protection of microencapsulated aroma compound,” Food Hydrocolloids, vol. 23, no. 8, pp. 2116–2124, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. L. P. da Costa, “Alginate in biomedical applications,” in Alginates, p. 81, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. Y. Qin, “The gel swelling properties of alginate fibers and their applications in wound management,” Polymers for Advanced Technologies, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 6–14, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. T. Gilchrist and A. Martin, “Wound treatment with Sorbsan -- an alginate fibre dressing,” Biomaterials, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 317–320, 1983. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. R. Fraser and T. Gilchrist, “Sorbsan calcium alginate fibre dressings in footcare,” Biomaterials, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 222–224, 1983. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. C. Knill, J. Kennedy, J. Mistry et al., “Alginate fibres modified with unhydrolysed and hydrolysed chitosans for wound dressings,” Carbohydrate Polymers, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 65–76, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. P. Yadav, H. Yadav, V. G. Shah, G. Shah, and G. Dhaka, “Biomedical biopolymers, their origin and evolution in biomedical sciences: a systematic review,” Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research: JCDR, vol. 9, no. 9, pp. ZE21–ZE25, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. F. Shahidi, J. K. V. Arachchi, and Y.-J. Jeon, “Food applications of chitin and chitosans,” Trends in Food Science & Technology, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 37–51, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. S. Hirano, “Chitin biotechnology applications,” in Biotechnology annual review, pp. 237–258, Elsevier, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
  19. R. Yadav and M. Chauhan, “Pharmaceutical diversity of chitin and chitosan: a review,” International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research, vol. 2, pp. 6–11, 2017. View at: Google Scholar
  20. L. Ilium, “Chitosan and its use as a pharmaceutical excipient,” Pharmaceutical Research, vol. 15, no. 9, pp. 1326–1331, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. G. W. Gooday, “The ecology of chitin degradation,” in Advances in microbial ecology, pp. 387–430, Springer, 1990. View at: Google Scholar
  22. S. E. Bailey, T. J. Olin, R. M. Bricka, and D. D. Adrian, “A review of potentially low-cost sorbents for heavy metals,” Water Research, vol. 33, no. 11, pp. 2469–2479, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. A. Singla and M. Chawla, “Chitosan: some pharmaceutical and biological aspects-an update,” Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, vol. 53, no. 8, pp. 1047–1067, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. S. Koide, “Chitin-chitosan: properties, benefits and risks,” Nutrition Research, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 1091–1101, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. V. Dodane and V. D. Vilivalam, “Pharmaceutical applications of chitosan,” Pharmaceutical Science & Technology Today, vol. 1, no. 6, pp. 246–253, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. Y. Sun, J. Zhang, S. Wu, and Shujun Wang, “Preparation of D-glucosamine by hydrolysis of chitosan with chitosanase and β-D-glucosaminidase,” International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, vol. 61, pp. 160–163, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. L. Dai Tran, H. V. Tran, T. T. Mai et al., “Biomedical and environmental applications of chitosan-based nanomaterials,” Journal of Chitin chitosan, vol. 16, no. 1, p. 7, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  28. J. Liu, J. Zhang, Y. Shi, S. Grimsgaard, T. Alraek, and V. Fønnebø, “Chinese red yeast rice (Monascus purpureus) for primary hyperlipidemia: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials,” Chinese Medicine, vol. 1, no. 1, p. 4, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. N. Gunde-Cimerman and A. Cimerman, “Pleurotus fruiting bodies contain the inhibitor of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase—lovastatin,” Experimental Mycology, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 1–6, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. R. V. Fugit and N. D. Resch, “Conversion of patients from simvastatin to lovastatin in an outpatient pharmacy clinic,” American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, vol. 57, no. 18, pp. 1703–1708, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. A. J. Shinde and H. N. More, “Lovastatin loaded chitosan nanoparticles: preparation, evaluation and in vitro release studies,” Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology, vol. 4, no. 12, pp. 1869–1876, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  32. C.-Y. Yu, X.-C. Zhang, F. Z. Zhou, X. Z. Zhang, S. X. Cheng, and R. X. Zhuo, “Sustained release of antineoplastic drugs from chitosan-reinforced alginate microparticle drug delivery systems,” International Journal of Pharmaceutics, vol. 357, no. 1-2, pp. 15–21, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. N. S. Rejinold, M. Muthunarayanan, K. Muthuchelian, K. P. Chennazhi, S. V. Nair, and R. Jayakumar, “Saponin-loaded chitosan nanoparticles and their cytotoxicity to cancer cell lines in vitro,” Carbohydrate Polymers, vol. 84, no. 1, pp. 407–416, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. R. Nanda, A. Sasmal, and P. Nayak, “Preparation and characterization of chitosan-polylactide composites blended with Cloisite 30B for control release of the anticancer drug paclitaxel,” Carbohydrate Polymers, vol. 83, no. 2, pp. 988–994, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. P. Li, Y.-N. Dai, J. P. Zhang, A. Q. Wang, and Q. Wei, “Chitosan-alginate nanoparticles as a novel drug delivery system for nifedipine,” International journal of biomedical science: IJBS, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 221–228, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  36. L. Lacerda, A. L. Parize, V. Fávere, M. C. M. Laranjeira, and H. K. Stulzer, “Development and evaluation of pH-sensitive sodium alginate/chitosan microparticles containing the antituberculosis drug rifampicin,” Materials Science and Engineering: C, vol. 39, pp. 161–167, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. A. García-Ceja, E. Mani-López, E. Palou, and A. López-Malo, “Viability during refrigerated storage in selected food products and during simulated gastrointestinal conditions of individual and combined lactobacilli encapsulated in alginate or alginate-chitosan,” LWT - Food Science and Technology, vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 482–489, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. N. T. Chinh, N. T. Ly, T. T. Mai et al., “Characteristic and properties of chitosan/alginate polymer blend carrying lovastatin drug,” Journal of Science and Technology, vol. 54, no. 2B, pp. 118–124, 2016. View at: Google Scholar
  39. H. Thai, C. Thuy Nguyen, L. Thi Thach et al., “Characterization of chitosan/alginate/lovastatin nanoparticles and investigation of their toxic effects _in vitro_ and _in vivo_,” Scientific Reports, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 909–915, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. H. Zhang, Z. Li, Z. Zhou, H. Yang, Z. Zhong, and C. Lou, “Antidepressant-like effects of ginsenosides: a comparison of ginsenoside Rb3 and its four deglycosylated derivatives, Rg3, Rh2, compound K, and 20(_S_)-protopanaxadiol in mice models of despair,” Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior, vol. 140, pp. 17–26, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. W. Xie, X. Meng, Y. Zhai et al., “Panax notoginseng saponins: a review of its mechanisms of antidepressant or anxiolytic effects and network analysis on phytochemistry and pharmacology,” Molecules, vol. 23, no. 4, p. 940, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. H. Xiang, Y. Liu, B. Zhang et al., “The antidepressant effects and mechanism of action of total saponins from the caudexes and leaves of Panax notoginseng in animal models of depression,” Phytomedicine, vol. 18, no. 8-9, pp. 731–738, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. P. Su, L. Wang, S. J. du, W. F. Xin, and W. S. Zhang, “Advance in studies of Panax notoginseng saponins on pharmacological mechanism of nervous system disease,” China journal of Chinese materia medica, vol. 39, no. 23, pp. 4516–4521, 2014. View at: Google Scholar
  44. R. Bahramsoltani, M. H. Farzaei, M. S. Farahani, and R. Rahimi, “Phytochemical constituents as future antidepressants: a comprehensive review,” Reviews in the Neurosciences, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 699–719, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. H. Thai, D. L. Tran, T. L. Thach et al., “Effect of both lovastatin and ginsenoside Rb1 on some properties and in-vitro drug release of alginate/chitosan/lovastatin/ginsenoside Rb1 composite films,” Journal of Polymers and the Environment, vol. 27, no. 12, pp. 2728–2738, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. T. Hoang, K. Ramadass, T. T. Loc et al., “Novel drug delivery system based on ginsenoside Rb1 loaded to chitosan/alginate nanocomposite films,” Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 3293–3300, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. D.-T. Nghiem, T.-C. Nguyen, M. T. Do et al., “Influence of the preparation method on some characteristics of alginate/chitosan/lovastatin composites,” Advances in Polymer Technology, vol. 2020, Article ID 7879368, 12 pages, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. G. Kandav, D. Bhatt, and D. K. Jindal, “Formulation and evaluation of allopurinol loaded chitosan nanoparticles,” International Journal of Applied Pharmaceutics, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 49–52, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. S. Honary and F. Zahir, “Effect of zeta potential on the properties of nano-drug delivery systems - a review (part 1),” Tropical Journal of Pharmaceutical Research, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 265–273, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2021 Quan Vo-An et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder
Views217
Downloads173
Citations

Related articles