International Journal of Spectroscopy

International Journal of Spectroscopy / 2014 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2014 |Article ID 132607 | 9 pages | https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/132607

Optical Path Length Calibration: A Standard Approach for Use in Absorption Cell-Based IR-Spectrometric Gas Analysis

Academic Editor: Rolf W. Berg
Received14 Mar 2014
Accepted28 May 2014
Published17 Jul 2014

Abstract

We employed a comparison method to determine the optical path length of gas cells which can be used in spectroscopic setup based on laser absorption spectroscopy or FTIR. The method is based on absorption spectroscopy itself. A reference gas cell, whose length is a priori known and desirably traceable to the international system of units (SI), and a gas mixture are used to calibrate the path length of a cell under test. By comparing spectra derived from pressure-dependent measurements on the two cells, the path length of the gas cell under test is determined. The method relies neither on the knowledge of the gas concentration nor on the line strength parameter of the probed transition which is very rarely traceable to the SI and of which the uncertainty is often relatively large. The method is flexible such that any infrared light source and infrared active molecule with isolated lines can be used. We elaborate on the method, substantiate the method by reporting results of this calibration procedure applied to multipass and single pass gas cells of lengths from 0.38 m to 21 m, and compare this to other methods. The relative combined uncertainty of the path length results determined using the comparison method was found to be in the ±0.4% range.

1. Introduction

Many absorption spectroscopy techniques such as tunable diode laser absorption spectroscopy (TDLAS), quantum cascade laser absorption spectroscopy (QCLAS), or Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy rely on the accurate knowledge of the optical path length of the absorption cell of the spectrometer wherein the gas sample interacts with the photons [16]. The determination of the optical path length of the gas cell prior to any quantitative spectroscopic analysis is indispensable in applications which aim at absolute measurements; in this case an incorrect path length of a gas cell would automatically lead to an incorrect result. If traceability should be an issue for the final spectroscopic analysis result, the determination of the optical path length also has to be traceably determined. The optical path length calibration (OPC), therefore, takes an important position in the characterization and validation of absolute absorption spectrometer setup.

There are several methods by which an OPC of a gas cell could be accomplished. Typically, in laser absorption spectroscopy, the same laser spectrometer setup is used to calibrate the path length of the cell by means of a gas mixture of previously known concentration as discussed in [7]. Assuming that all other parameters, both the spectroscopic and the gas condition ones, are exactly known, the spectroscopic signal of the spectrometer is taken to match the path length of the gas cell used so that the spectroscopic concentration result exactly reflects the reference concentration. This, however, is not independent of the application, that is, the concentration measurement.

The path length of a single pass cell can easily be determined using mechanical measurements. However, for single pass cell lengths in the few millimeters range, even mechanical measurements might be challenging to carry out. On the other hand, multipass gas cells, such as those of the Herriott et al. [8] or White [9] type, are used in most laboratories dealing with spectroscopic analysis in order to increase the spectrometer sensitivity. For those multipass gas cells, it can become even more challenging to determine the path length since multiple reflections are involved, and the effective optical length is difficult to assess. Mechanical measurements can, if at all, only yield some geometrical base length of which the actual optical path is often supposed to be an integer multiple.

Although the OPC is an essential part of a spectrometer characterization, its realization and interpretation still seem to manifest some issues and difficulties. Even in the gas metrology area, the OPC was identified as one of the major concerns in the outcome of a recent spectroscopic study [10].

In this paper, we promote an accurate easy to use method to calibrate the optical path length of a gas cell by means of laser spectroscopy. We show that the path length of a gas cell under test (CUT) can accurately be determined by a comparison to a reference cell of known path length. The quality of the presented OPC approach is superior to most simple mechanical measurements, approaches for multipass gas cells which count the number of spots on the cell mirrors, or to the use of gas standards. Traceability to the SI is possible with the OPC promoted here. We support the described implementation of this OPC method by presenting results on calibrating the optical path length of a multipass gas cell and a couple of single pass cells. The results are compared to mechanical path length measurements. In separate experiments, we validated each derived optical path length by measuring amount fractions of gravimetrically prepared gas mixtures. Finally, we present and discuss some recommendations for the proposed method.

2. New OPC Method

In laser absorption spectroscopy, the Beer Lambert law describes the relationship between the incident and the transmitted radiation through a gas cell containing a molecular gas sample:

The quantities and are the incident and the transmitted radiant powers; is the molecular transition line strength of the probed absorption line at gas temperature which is matched to the actually present isotopic abundance by means of , which is the ratio of the abundance in the sample compared to the value for which the line strength is reported. The function is the normalized line shape profile centered at and the absorption path length. Using the ideal gas law, the number density of the absorbing species can be expressed in terms of the partial pressure of the absorbing molecules and the gas temperature. The partial pressure can be related to the total pressure using the amount of substance fraction of the absorbing species, . Making use of the area normalization of , (1) can also be written as where the quantity is the spectral absorbance (Naperian), in certain cases (see, e.g., http://goldbook.iupac.org/A00028.html) also called extinction, and is the spectrally integrated area of the absorption line. Using (2) the species amount fraction can be derived from spectroscopic measurements as pointed out in previous publications [12]. This relation however can also be exploited for the OPC proposed by the present work.

Figure 1 depicts the setup used for the path length calibration. It typically contains an infrared diode laser, a Fabry-Perot etalon, a photodiode, and a pressure and temperature sensor similar to the setup in [12]. The two cells in Figure 1 are connected to each other and the same pressure sensor is used to determine the total gas pressure.

In Figure 1 the reference gas cell has an optical path length of  m and the cell under test (CUT) in this case has a nominal optical path length of 21 m. We used a serial arrangement in the experiment in order to keep with a single detector as opposed to a parallel arrangement where two detectors would have been required.

If the CUT is evacuated and the reference cell is filled with a gas sample, its spectrometric amount fraction can be expressed by (2) where is substituted by , by , and by , respectively. On the other hand, if the reference cell is evacuated and the gas cell under test is filled with the same gas sample, its spectrometric amount fraction is given by (2) where means the length to be calibrated and and are substituted by and , respectively.

Since the same gas was used in the reference cell and the CUT and the same transition was probed, both sides of (2) can be replaced to then read where and denote the line areas of the probed spectral absorption feature in the case of the reference and the gas cell under test, respectively. As presented in (3), the exact knowledge of the amount fraction of the gas mixture is not necessary in the calibration of length . Rearrangement of (3) leads to the model equation of the proposed OPC: where and , and to the premise that the same spectral feature, that is, the same molecular absorption line of the strength , was probed in both cells. The indices and indicate that multiple cell measurements could be repeated at variable gas pressures in both or one of the cells, thus adding some redundancy to the OPC. The gas temperatures and at the different pressures were recorded. This redundancy of the OPC can then be used to fit a linear line model to the data points (; ) by applying generalized linear regression (GLR) according to (4). From this linear model the slope is identified to deliver the path length .

In the case that for both cell measurements the same total gas pressure at the same gas temperature was realized, (4) would reduce to and the linear model would have to consider the regression on data points (; ). For the simplified condition expressed in (5), it can be observed that the line area ratio of the two cells is just equal to the length ratio. The described OPC procedure would yield a result which is traceable to the SI if all the input quantities , , , and used in (4) were traceable.

It should be noted here that, if both cell measurements would have been done at different gas temperatures instead, the line strengths would not be cancelled out and were to be matched to the temperatures of the reference and the test cell measurements, respectively, according to where and are the internal partition functions of the probed molecule at the reference temperature  K and , respectively. is the ground state energy of the probed transition, is the spectral transition wave number, is the Planck constant, and is the speed of light in vacuum. Because the line strength at is the same for both cells, only the temperature dependence of the line strength would have to be considered in the determination of .

Figure 2 depicts a schematic diagram of the OPC method. The general idea of the presented OPC procedure is based on a comparison of spectral features measured on the very same gas sample.

The feasibility of the method depends on the quality of the two spectra measured in the two cells, that is, on , , and their associated uncertainties and , respectively. Probing the same spectral line in both cells, a large amplitude difference of the two spectral features due to the different path lengths can be compensated for by means of different gas pressures in both cells. Thus, the absorption line in both cell spectra can be balanced so that the peak absorbance is still in the linear regime for a large and well above the noise level for a much smaller .

The usability of the method to calibrate a path length depends on the availability of a suitable reference cell, characterized by and , and can be expressed by the dynamic range of this OPC method defined as the maximum length ratio for which the inferred length uncertainty is smaller than the value tolerable for a given experimental task. A certain reference cell can be used to calibrate a number of path lengths up to , if its uncertainty applies to . The uncertainty of the calibrated optical path length is a function of the uncertainties , , and and of those of the pressure and temperature measurements , , , and if pressures and temperatures were different in both cells.

3. Experimental OPC Results

3.1. Calibration of the Path length of a Multipass Gas Cell (White Cell)

The setup sketched in Figure 1 was used to calibrate the path length of a White cell of a nominal path length of  m by means of a reference gas cell of an optical path length of = (0.2003815 ± 0.000062) m. This reference cell path length was modeled as = + , where = 0.2003815 m is the certified geometrical cell length and is a possible correction due to some possible deviation of the actual laser beam path from the optical axis. As sketched in Figure 3, this correction can be expressed as with , and when = 0.01 m is the free optical aperture of the cell. The combined uncertainty of the reference gas cell optical path length was estimated from the geometrical length uncertainty  m () taken from the certificate of the geometrical reference length measured by the Coordinate Metrology Department of PTB employing a coordinate measurement machine (CMM, Type Leitz PMM866) (http://www.ptb.de/cms/en/fachabteilungen/abt5/fb-53/ag-535.html) and an uncertainty contribution . While our estimate for the laser beam path was taken to be = 0, we calculated a conservative scenario setting the uncertainty to be  mm, by overestimating a rectangular probability distribution that is within the interval . Finally the reference cell path length uncertainty was estimated from () = () + .

For this OPC, a distributed feedback (DFB) diode laser emitting at 2 μm was used. In order to perform the measurements, the wavelength of the DFB laser was swept by triangular modulation of the laser current at a frequency of 138.9 Hz. For signal detection, a photodiode was employed from which the signal was digitized by a 16-bit data acquisition card (DAC) at a sampling rate of 1.2 MS/s.

In order to calibrate the path length of the multipass gas cell, a gas mixture of CO2 in N2 was used. The line of CO2 at 4987.31 cm−1 was probed. As mentioned before, information on the exact amount fraction of the target species in the gas mixture is not required for the OPC data processing.

For the OPC, both cells were evacuated and background measurements showed no CO2 absorption, for example, from residual gas in the cell or outside the cell pathlength. The baseline noise level was determined to be less than based on a standard deviation of the residual of the absorption line fit. Then the reference cell was filled with the CO2-containing sample gas mixture. Spectroscopic measurements with the reference cell were carried out for different values of the total gas pressure inside the reference cell according to (4), determining the respective line areas for each pressure by means of fitting a single Voigt profile to each nonaveraged absorption profile. In the fitting process the Doppler-width was computed using the measured gas temperature , while the Lorentzian width and the line area were fitted as well as the line position. Secondly, whereas the reference cell was evacuated again, the multipass cell under test was filled with the same gas mixture and measurements were performed for different gas pressures according to (4), to determine the respective line areas from the multipass cell’s absorbance spectra. The gas pressure and the gas temperature were each measured with a pressure sensor (MKS Baratron) and a PT100 temperature sensor, respectively. After each change of the gas pressure in the cells, data were just monitored for a period of 10 minutes to accommodate thermodynamic equilibration of the gas sample prior to real spectra recording. Within the recording duration of all spectra, the stability in terms of the standard deviation of the line area, the temperature and the pressure of the gas sample was typically within ±0.25%, ±0.07%, and ±0.14%, respectively.

Figure 4 depicts typical data measured on a gas sample in the reference cell (nominally 20 mmol/mol CO2) at a total pressure of = (201 ± 0.2) × 102 Pa. The detector signal in the top panel of Figure 4 is the signal measured when a removable Fabry-Perot etalon is placed inside the beam path to the detector (cf. Figure 1) when both cells were evacuated. The etalon signal is used to establish a linear wave number axis by means of the sweep rate derived from the fringe separation as presented in [1216]. The detector signal in the bottom panel of Figure 4, measured when the Fabry-Perot etalon was removed, shows the used absorption feature of CO2.

In Figure 5, line profiles of the reference cell (Figure 5(a)) and the multipass cell under test (Figure 5(b)), respectively, are displayed. These absorbance data were derived from the measured signal in Figure 4 according to , where was derived by fitting a polynomial baseline to the measured signal [1317] for the reference cell and for the CUT accordingly.

Voigt profiles were subsequently fitted to the absorbance data in Figure 5 in order to derive values for the respective line areas for the given gas pressures, that is, and , respectively. In this fitting process the Doppler-width was computed according to the measured gas temperature , while the Lorentzian width and the line area as well as the exact line position were fitted. As plotted in the example spectra in Figure 5 the standard deviation of the residuals of the 0.2 m reference and the 21 m multipass gas cells was 1 × 10−3 and 2 × 10−3, resulting in signal-to-noise ratios of 50 and 494, respectively. Unlike the improved residual structure for the 20 cm gas cell at the lowest pressure of 185 × 102 Pa (see, e.g., Figure 5), the residual structure of the multipass gas cell has a typical “w” structure indicating the presence of collisional narrowing at the lowest gas pressure of 6 × 102 Pa. Such oscillating structure has been shown to have a marginal effect on the line area [18]. Here, for the multipass gas cell, the residual structure area is 0.004% of the line area, which we consider to be negligible. The residual structure area was found to be <0.004% for all other measurements presented in this paper. Hence, the “w-” shaped residual structure of the multipass gas cell has an insignificant effect on the line area. The derived line areas and the other input parameters were used to derive the values of and and the line strength was matched to each of the measured gas temperatures and applying (6).

Figure 6(a) depicts a plot of as a function of . According to (4), the path length of the multipass gas cell was determined from the slope parameter of the generalized linear regression (GLR) applied to the data points . In compliance with the GUM [19] the GLR was performed by means of the BLeast software [20] which is well known from ISO 6143 [21]. Input uncertainties for this GLR were taken as reported in Table 2. The path length of the CUT resulting from the data in Figure 6(a) was evaluated to be (21.87 ± 0.04) m. A combined uncertainty of ±0.04 m (±0.20% relative) was estimated from the approach. It should be noted that both the uncertainties of and were taken into account applying the GLR.

3.2. Calibration of the Path Length of a Single Pass Gas Cell

Another OPC was carried out in a similar manner, this time calibrating the path length of a single pass gas cell of a nominal length of 82 cm. For this OPC, however, a different spectrometer setting and a different gas mixture of 10 mmol/mol CH4 in synthetic air were utilized to show the flexibility of the OPC method. In the spectrometer, a DFB diode laser emitting at 1.65 μm was used and a CH4 line at 6046.96 cm−1 was probed modulating the laser current again at 138.9 Hz. Data acquisition now took place at a sampling rate of 600 kS/s with the same DAC. The fitting procedure for the CH4 absorbance data was performed in a manner similar to the data presented in Figure 5. Here, it should be noted once more that the proposed OPC method is independent of the exact amount fraction of the gas mixture, the probed molecule, and the IR light source.

Figure 6(b) depicts data, similar to Figure 6(a), which were processed by GLR to determine the path length of the 82 cm single pass gas cell. The slope of the linear model fitted to the data resulted in a path length of the single pass cell of = 81.90 cm. Again, the BLeast software was used to perform the GLR. The combined uncertainty of the path length was estimated to be = ±0.29 cm (±0.35% relative).

4. Discussions

The OPC method described was employed to calibrate a number of gas cells for their use in different spectroscopic applications. For the present paper, results on four different cells are summarized in Table 1. Based on these results the OPC method was also brought forward as a standard approach (SA) for OPC in our lab and is about to be established as SA in the EUMETRISPEC joint research project [22].


CellCell type /m /m /m Speciesa / m

AMP*21.87 ± 0.04021.26 ± 0.310.9CO22.0
BSP, HP*0.819 ± 0.00290.822 ± 0.00100.50.805 ± 0.0410.2CH41.65
CSP, BW*0.773 ± 0.00200.774 ± 0.00100.20.773 ± 0.0380.0CH41.65
CSP, BW*0.773 ± 0.00200.774 ± 0.00100.20.774 ± 0.0120.04CO22.71
DSP, HT*0.380 ± 0.00120.380 ± 0.00200.00.380 ± 0.0190.0CH41.65

Gas standards probed at wavelengths specified in column.
*Cell characteristics: MP multipass White type, SP single pass cell, HP high pressure cell, BW Brewster windows-equipped, and HT high temperature cell.

Quantityp T

/%0.160.080.400.03

Table 1 summarizes the OPC results in terms of the derived and and compares them to respective results on simple mechanical measurements reported as and , respectively, where applicable, and to results and which are based on the use of gas standards of amount fractions according to the rearrangement of (2) to yield as a result. The mechanical measurements were performed using a meter rule and a caliper (resolution: 0.001 m) calibrated against length standards.

The relative combined uncertainties of the OPC path length results in Table 1 are in the 0.2–0.4% range. Table 2 holds the standard uncertainties () of the most significant input quantities in (3) and (4) used to determine .

As shown in Table 2, the input quantity with the highest relative uncertainty is the line area. As such, it provides the most significant uncertainty contribution to the combined uncertainty of the path length . The standard uncertainty of was estimated from fitting a Voigt profile to the measured absorbance data. For this, the Origin fitting error output [23] was used, derived on the most noisy and least signal-to-noise spectra as a conservative estimate (see, e.g., Figure 5(a)). It could be noted here that for the OPC method we used the same line profile, the same spectral window, and the same wave number axis to model the spectra from the two cells in a similar manner, and since we were dealing with the ratio of two line areas, the uncertainty contribution of the wave number axis to the line area uncertainty was eliminated from our analysis. Any uncertainty contribution to the line area as a result of the residual structure was neglected, since the area from the residuals of the multipass gas cell in Figure 5 was negligible (max. 0.004% of the line area) for all measurements. The uncertainties of the other input quantities, that is, , , and , were propagated from respective calibration certificates. The traceability to the SI of the input parameters and was reached via respective standards.

The relative combined uncertainties of in Table 1 are in the ±0.53% range. The combined uncertainties of were estimated using the resolution of the caliper. The quantity is the normalized error of the mechanical length result expressed as where and . The are all less than 1, indicating that the results of from the OPC approach for the different gas cells agree with the respective values of . This agreement of and validates the presented OPC method. Although it is much more complicated than mechanical measurements, the OPC method presented in this paper was still being applicable in cases where path lengths cannot be determined by mechanical measurements, for example, in multipass gas cells and very short length single pass gas cells. For those cells the OPC method is probably the best candidate to be utilized for optical path length determination.

Table 1 also shows an agreement between from the OPC and as documented by the values of being all less than 1. However, the uncertainties of in Table 1 are about 13 times larger (up to 5%) than the uncertainties of which are found to be in the ±0.4% range instead. Also, the uncertainties of in Table 1 are 9 times larger than the uncertainties of .

These large values of the uncertainties of are a result of the uncertainties of the used line strength figures. In Table 3, an example uncertainty budget for is presented, derived using the GUM Workbench [11] which shows the impact of the line strength uncertainty on the combined uncertainty of . As can be seen from Table 3, the index value [11] (relative contribution of the uncertainties of an input quantity to the combined uncertainty of ) of the line strength is 99.1%, indicating that the line strength’s uncertainty provides the most significant contribution to . For spectroscopic data evaluation in applications, such as environmental monitoring, where uncertainties in the subpercentage range are often requested, these large discourage the use of .


Input quantityValueRelative uncertainty/%Index/%

p 244 hPa0.160.0
T 294.8 K0.08 0.1
0.00402 cm−10.40.6
0.01 mol/mol0.993.7
8.289 × 10−22
cm−1/(cm−2·molec)
595.4
0.805 m5

Regarding line strengths, the values and their uncertainties are usually measured or taken from spectroscopic data bases such as HITRAN [24] or GEISA [25]. However, traceable line strength values and GUM-compliant uncertainty figures are very rarely reported in the literature or data bases [26]. Hence, it is very likely that path lengths derived as could be biased. The line strength values used for the evaluation of in Table 3 were taken from the HITRAN [24] data base, except for for the multipass gas cell (A) where the line strength was measured by PTB [27, 28]. The relative standard uncertainties of the HITRAN line strengths used here are in the 2–5% range [24]. On the contrary, while omitting the line strength value, smaller uncertainties and traceability to the SI could be reached by means of the OPC method presented here. As presented and in addition, the following advantages solidify the OPC method:(i)the method does not depend on a specific analyte; any infrared active molecule with a sufficiently isolated line can be used for the OPC method (depending on the light source);(ii)knowledge of the exact amount fraction of the probed species in the gas sample is not necessary; since is not used in (4), its uncertainty does not contribute to the uncertainty of ;(iii)OPC as presented here in general does not depend on any line strength parameter , so that its uncertainty, for example, taken from existing data bases, does not contribute to the uncertainty of ;(iv)large amplitude differences in the absorption signal due to large length ratios can be compensated by appropriate pressure differences between the two cell measurements;(v)the quantities contributing to the path length uncertainty can be minimized if pressure and temperature of both gas cells are always the same in the respective spectroscopic measurements, thus reducing the path length uncertainty ;(vi)the method is independent of the actual application; that is, finally, the spectrometer’s path length figure is independent of any concentration retrieval performed with the spectrometer.

If needed and if traceable line strengths data with low uncertainties were available, the OPC procedure could be made even more flexible on the other side. For a given reference cell of length the dynamic length range that can be covered can be remarkably exceeded if one probes two different absorption lines, giving rise to the modified expression , thus considering different individual line strengths and for two different lines of the same gas probed in the two cells. Using different absorption lines, for example, from different bands, branches, and/or species isotopologues, with gradually different line strengths, the dynamic range can be varied in principle by several orders of magnitude. Each of these line strengths have to be matched to the isotopic abundance actually present in the gas sample by means of . This idea, however, has the drawback of introducing additional uncertainty contributions regarding the line strengths and and the isotopic abundance factors and , respectively. They all individually contribute and thus definitely enlarge ) compared to the initial concept of probing the very same transition.

5. Conclusion

We presented a spectroscopic method to measure traceable optical path lengths of an absorption cell. We showed that the optical path length of a gas cell can be accurately calibrated comparing absorption spectra using the OPC method. For this paper, the OPC method was combined with tunable diode laser absorption spectroscopy. The relative uncertainties of our OPC results were in the range of 0.2 to 0.4%. This OPC method leads to a significant improvement in cases where mechanical path length determination is difficult for gas cells because of geometrical or operational reasons. It is also advantageous with respect to the use of gas standards for optical path length measurements. This is because the latter directly depends on the exact knowledge of molecular line strengths, whose uncertainties are sometimes comparably large. Traceability to the SI is also lacking in most cases. The dynamic range and the flexibility of this OPC method are related to the availability of a reference cell with path length accuracy that exceeds the desired path length accuracy of the cell under test. The OPC method is not limited to TDLAS; other absorption spectroscopic techniques such as QCLAS or FTIR could be used in a similar manner.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

Parts of this work received funding from EMRP projects. The authors acknowledge fruitful collaboration within the EMRP projects GAS (ENG01), MACPoll (ENV01), METEOMET (ENV07), and EUMETRISPEC (ENV06). The EMRP is jointly funded by the EMRP participating countries within EURAMET and the European Union. The authors are grateful to E. Gettkandt and K. Wendt for the calibration of the reference cell under Reference no. 5.3-2013-014.

References

  1. P. Ortwein, W. Woiwode, S. Fleck et al., “Absolute diode laser-based in situ detection of HCl in gasification processes,” Experiments in Fluids, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 961–968, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. G. Wysocki, M. McCurdy, S. So et al., “Pulsed quantum-cascade laser-based sensor for trace-gas detection of carbonyl sulfide,” Applied Optics, vol. 43, no. 32, pp. 6040–6046, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. J. A. Nwaboh, O. Werhahn, and D. Schiel, “Measurement of CO amount fractions using a pulsed quantum-cascade laser operated in the intrapulse mode,” Applied Physics B, vol. 103, no. 4, pp. 947–957, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. V. Ebert and J. Wolfrum, “Absorption spectroscopy,” in Optical Measurements: Techniques and Applications, pp. 227–265, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  5. G. Casa, D. A. Parretta, A. Castrillo, R. Wehr, and L. Gianfrani, “Highly accurate determinations of CO2 line strengths using intensity-stabilized diode laser absorption spectrometry,” Journal of Chemical Physics, vol. 127, no. 8, Article ID 084311, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. C. Schulz, A. Dreizler, V. Ebert, and J. Wolfrum, “Combustion diagnostics,” in Springer Handbook of Experimental Fluid Dynamics, C. Tropea, J. Foss, and A. Yarin, Eds., pp. 1241–1316, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  7. L. Mei, H. Jayaweera, P. Lundin, S. Svanberg, and G. Somesfalean, “Gas spectroscopy and optical path-length assessment in scattering media using a frequency-modulated continuous-wave diode laser,” Optics Letters, vol. 36, no. 16, pp. 3036–3038, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. D. Herriott, H. Kogelnik, and R. Kompfner, “Off-axis paths in spherical mirror interferometers,” Applied Optics, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 523–526, 1964. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. J. U. White, “Long optical paths of large aperture,” Journal of the Optical Society of America, vol. 32, no. 5, p. 285, 1942. View at: Google Scholar
  10. E. Flores, F. Idrees, P. Moussay et al., “Final report of the pilot study CCQM-P110-B1: A comparison of nitrogen dioxide (NO2) in nitrogen standards at 10 µmol/mol by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR),” Metrologia, vol. 49, Article ID 08006, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. GUM Workbench Professional Version 2.4 and GUM Workbench Manual for Version 2.4, Metrodata GmbH, Grenzach-Wyhlen, Germany, http://www.metrodata.de.
  12. J. A. Nwaboh, O. Werhahn, P. Ortwein, D. Schiel, and V. Ebert, “Laser-spectrometric gas analysis: CO2-TDLAS at 2 μm,” Measurement Science and Technology, vol. 24, no. 1, Article ID 015202, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. B. Buchholz, N. Böse, and V. Ebert, “Absolute validation of a diode laser hygrometer via intercomparison with the German national primary water vapor standard,” Applied Physics B, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. W. Gurlit, R. Zimmermann, C. Giesemann et al., “Lightweight diode laser spectrometer CHILD (compact high-altitude In-situ laser diode) for balloonborne measurements of water vapor and methane,” Applied Optics, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 91–102, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. A. Pogány, O. Ott, O. Werhahn, and V. Ebert, “Towards traceability in CO2 line strength measurements by TDLAS at 2.7 μm,” Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer, vol. 130, pp. 147–157, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. O. Witzel, A. Klein, S. Wagner, C. Meffert, C. Schulz, and V. Ebert, “High-speed tunable diode laser absorption spectroscopy for sampling-free in-cylinder water vapor concentration measurements in an optical IC engine,” Applied Physics B: Lasers and Optics, vol. 109, no. 3, pp. 521–532, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. S. Wagner, M. Klein, T. Kathrotia et al., “Absolute, spatially resolved, in situ CO profiles in atmospheric laminar counter-flow diffusion flames using 2.3 μm TDLAS,” Applied Physics B: Lasers and Optics, vol. 109, no. 3, pp. 533–540, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. J. Henningsen and H. Simonsen, “The (2201-000) band of CO2 at 6348 cm−1: linestrengths, broadening parameters, and pressure shifts,” Journal of Molecular Spectroscopy, vol. 203, no. 1, pp. 16–27, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. ISO Guide 98-3, Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement, 1. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland, 2008, http://www.bipm.org/utils/common/documents/jcgm/JCGM_100_2008_E.pdf.
  20. Bundesanstalt für Materialforschung und- Prüfung (BAM), BLeast-software, also recommended by ISO 6143, http://www.bam.de.
  21. ISO 6143: 2001, “Gas analysis—comparison methods for determining and checking the composition of calibration gas mixtures,” 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  22. EMRP-Project ENV06 (EUMETRISPEC), “Spectral reference data for atmospheric monitoring,” http://www.eumetrispec.eu/. View at: Google Scholar
  23. Origin 7.5 SR6, OriginLab Cooperation, Northampton, Mass, USA, 2006, http://www.OriginLab.com.
  24. L. S. Rothman, I. E. Gordon, A. Barbe et al., “HITRAN2008,” Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer, vol. 110, pp. 533–572, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  25. N. Jacquinet-Husson, N. A. Scott, A. Chédin et al., “The GEISA spectroscopic database: current and future archive for earth and planetary atmosphere studies,” Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer, vol. 109, no. 6, pp. 1043–1059, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. L. S. Rothman, N. Jacquinet-Husson, C. Boulet, and A. M. Perrin, “History and future of the molecular spectroscopic databases,” Comptes Rendus Physique, vol. 6, no. 8, pp. 897–907, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. G. J. Padilla-Víquez, J. Koelliker-Delgado, O. Werhahn, K. Jousten, and D. Schiel, “Traceable CO2-R(12) line intensity for laser-spectroscopy-based gas analysis near 2 μm,” IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 529–533, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. G. Wübbeler, G. J. Padilla-Viquez, K. Jousten, O. Werhahn, and C. Elster, “Comparison and assessment of procedures for calculating the R(12) line strength of the ν1+2ν2+ν3 band of CO2,” Journal of Chemical Physics, vol. 135, no. 20, Article ID 204304, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2014 Javis Anyangwe Nwaboh et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


More related articles

3332 Views | 671 Downloads | 9 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly and safely as possible. Any author submitting a COVID-19 paper should notify us at help@hindawi.com to ensure their research is fast-tracked and made available on a preprint server as soon as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted articles related to COVID-19. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.