Journal of Diabetes Research

Journal of Diabetes Research / 2013 / Article
Special Issue

Chronic Vascular Complications in Diabetes

View this Special Issue

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2013 |Article ID 151675 | 8 pages | https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/151675

Insulin Sensitivity and Beta-Cell Function Are Associated with Arterial Stiffness in Individuals without Hypertension

Academic Editor: Weiping Jia
Received01 Dec 2012
Accepted04 Jan 2013
Published26 Feb 2013

Abstract

Aim. We investigated the relationship between brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV) and glucose levels, insulin sensitivity, and beta-cell function in Chinese individuals with or without hypertension. Methods. We recruited 3137 nondiabetic individuals whose age, body mass index (BMI), glucose levels, blood pressure (BP), lipids, hemoglobin A1C (HbA1c), baPWV, and insulin levels were measured. Results. In normotensive group, 2 h glucose levels ( , ) associated with baPWV, showed a significant increase in patients with NG as compared to those with DM ( ). The hypertensive group showed no such differences. The Matsuda index ( , ) and HOMA-β ( , ) were negatively correlated with baPWV while lnHOMA-IR ( , ) and the Quantitative Insulin Sensitivity Check Index (QUICKI) ( , ) showed a borderline negative correlation. BaPWV significantly decreased ( ) with an increase in insulin sensitivity in individuals with both normal BP and glucose tolerance. Conclusions. BaPWV was significantly associated with 2 h glucose levels, insulin sensitivity and beta-cell function in normotensive population, whereas in hypertensive individuals, BP was the dominant factor influencing arterial stiffness. Individuals with abnormal insulin sensitivity in the absence of diabetes and hypertension are also at an increased risk of arterial stiffness.

1. Introduction

It is well known that the prevalence of cardiovascular disease (CVD) is high among individuals with abnormal glucose tolerance, resulting in significant mortality and morbidity rates from macrovascular diseases in such individuals. A large number of population studies have focused on the relationship between arterial stiffness and glucose abnormality; however, the conclusions remain controversial. Among these studies, most have revealed a positive association between arterial stiffness and type 2 diabetes [14], while some have found fasting and postchallenge glucose levels and HbA1c levels, which reflect 2-3 months of glycemic control, to be independently related to accelerated stiffening of arteries [46]. However, the best predictor of arterial stiffness among these remains unclear. Some studies show that 2 h blood glucose levels are better predictors than fasting blood glucose levels and HbA1c levels [7, 8], while another study reported different results [6]. In addition, recent studies have suggested that 1 h or 30 min blood glucose levels during the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) may also demonstrate a stronger correlation with arterial stiffness [911]. Variability in populations and evaluated factors between different studies may have led to these inconsistencies.

Indeed, individuals with CVDs and hypertension, who also commonly display abnormal glucose metabolism [12], individuals were rarely included in these studies. Therefore, we wanted to determine whether plasma glucose levels had the same effects on arterial stiffness in individuals with and without hypertension as well as elucidate the glycemic status that exerted maximum influence on arterial stiffness. Measuring pulse wave velocity (PWV) is widely used to assess arterial stiffness in the clinical setting because of its convenience and noninvasiveness [13]. Recent studies showed that PWV, especially brachial-ankle PWV (baPWV), can be used as a tool for screening cardiovascular risk and as a marker for assessing the severity of atherosclerotic vascular damage in the general population [14]. baPWV has been shown to be related with several factors such as age [15], blood pressure (BP) [16], dyslipidemia [17], and obesity [18]. Increased BP and glucose tolerance are also associated with increased insulin resistance (IR); however, few reports have described the relationship between IR and PWV. Therefore, we investigated the relationship between baPWV and glucose metabolism in a large sample of Chinese individuals with or without hypertension and delineated the impact of different glucose metabolism conditions on baPWV as well as the impact of the interaction between glucose levels and BP on arterial stiffness.

2. Subjects and Methods

2.1. Study Population

We recruited community-dwelling individuals aged 40–75 years living in the Gulou district, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, China, from June 2011 to December 2011. A total of 10027 participants were invited by telephone or door-to-door visit to take part in this study. The protocol was approved by the ethics committee of The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University. After excluding individuals with a history of type 2 diabetes and cerebral, cardiovascular, peripheral artery, liver, and chronic kidney diseases, 3137 individuals were included in our study. The use of antihypertensive agents was also an exclusion criteria for our study.

2.2. Clinical and Biochemical Measurements

All measurements and procedures were performed from 7:30 to 11:30 AM following an overnight fast. The heights and weights of the subjects were measured with individuals dressed in only a single layer of clothes without shoes. Body mass index (BMI) was expressed as the weight in kilograms divided by the height in meters (kg/m2). The waist circumference was measured in the standing position at the level of the umbilicus by traditional examiners, and the waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) was calculated by dividing waist circumference by hip circumference. Fasting parameters, including levels of fasting plasma glucose (FPG), HbA1c, triglyceride (TG), low-density lipoprotein (LDL), high-density lipoprotein (HDL), and total cholesterol, were measured in each subject using standardized procedures. A 75 g OGTT was performed with plasma glucose sampling done at 0, 30, and 120 min. HbA1c levels in peripheral blood were measured using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC, BIO-RAD Company, USA). Plasma glucose levels were measured using the hexokinase method, HDL levels using the accelerator selective detergent method, LDL levels using the liquid selective detergent method, triglyceride (TG) levels using the glycerol phosphate oxidase method, and total cholesterol levels using the enzymatic method. All measurements were analyzed by the autoanalyzer (Modular E170; Roche). Serum insulin concentrations were determined with the Phadebas Insulin Test (Pharmacia, Uppsala, Sweden) using a radioimmunosorbent technique. Glucose metabolic status was categorized as follows: normal glucose tolerance (NGT; fasting glucose, <5.6 mmol/L; 2 h glucose, <7.8 mmol/L), prediabetes mellitus (pre-DM; including impaired fasting glucose: 5.6 mmol/L ≤ fasting glucose < 7 mmol/L or impaired glucose tolerance: 7.8 mmol/L ≤2 h glucose < 11.1 mmol/L, among them 143 participants had both IFG and IFG in this group), and diabetes mellitus (DM; fasting glucose ≥ 7.0 mmol/L or 2 h glucose ≥ 11.1 mmol/L).

Blood pressures (BP) was measured using a standardized sphygmomanometer and quantified from the mean of 3 consecutive measurements taken with at least 5 min intervals of rest. Hypertension was diagnosed if the average systolic BP (SBP) was 140 mmHg or diastolic BP (DBP) was 90 mmHg. BaPWV was measured in the supine position using a waveform analyzer (VP-1000; Colin Co., Komaki, Japan) after at least 5 min of bed rest. Briefly, the PWV value was calculated as the distance/transit time ratio and expressed in centimeter per second (cm/s). The mean of the left and right baPWV (average baPWV) was obtained for all participants and used for analysis.

2.3. Statistical Analysis

IR was calculated using the mathematical formula of HOMA-IR by dividing the product of fasting blood insulin (FBI; lU/mL) and fasting blood glucose (FBG; mmol/L) by 22.5. The Quantitative Insulin Sensitivity Check Index (QUICKI) was also used for the measurement of IR by dividing 1 by the sum of the logarithms of FBI and FBG [18]. The Matsuda Insulin Sensitivity Index (Matsuda ISI), which measures hepatic and peripheral IR, was calculated by the following formula: 10000/(FBG × FBI × mean glucose during OGTT × mean insulin during OGTT) [19]. Beta-cell function was estimated by the following formula: (20 insulin (mU/L))/(glucose (mmol/L) − 3.5)). Collated data were analyzed using SPSS 17.0 for Windows (Chicago, IL, USA). Data from individual subjects was expressed as mean standard deviation, and the differences between groups were compared by Student’s t-test. -statistic was used to compare proportions. Stepwise multiple linear regression analysis was performed to determine the effect of study variables on the PWV value. HOMA-IR was not normally distributed, so we transformed the variables logarithmically for all multivariate analyses. Comparisons of means were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). A value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. Baseline Characteristics of Subjects

Table 1 shows the biochemical and clinical variables of the groups classified by glucose tolerance. All parameters differed significantly among the three groups. Among them, age and HDL, LDL and total cholesterol levels did not differ between the pre-DM and DM groups. The pre-DM group had a higher baPWV compared with the normal group, while the DM group had the highest baPWV.


NGTPre-DMDM P valueAge and gender
( )( )( )Adjusted P

Age (year)54.71 ± 8.21a,c57.81 ± 8.5058.18 ± 8.41<0.001
Gender (male/female)708/1082358/485147/157<0.001
BMI (Kg/m2)23.40 ± 2.89a,c24.78 ± 3.23b25.79 ± 3.03<0.001<0.001
WHR0.86 ± 0.670.89 ± 0.630.90 ± 630.79<0.001<0.001
FPG (mmol/L)5.35 ± 0.35a,c5.83 ± 0.52b7.45 ± 1.85<0.001<0.001
30 min PG8.52 ± 1.52a,c10.17 ± 1.48b12.82 ± 2.68<0.001<0.001
120 min PG6.04 ± 1.02a,c8.49 ± 1.35b13.89 ± 3.78<0.001<0.001
HbA1c (%)5.60 ± 0.37a,c5.82 ± 0.400b6.85 ± 1.32<0.001<0.001
HDL (mmol/L)1.39 ± 0.35a,c1.32 ± 0.321.29 ± 0.29<0.001<0.001
LDL (mmol/L)1.83 ± 0.75a2.93 ± 0.823.04 ± 0.82<0.001<0.001
TG (mmol/L)1.38 ± 0.92a,c1.74 ± 1.12b1.97 ± 1.31<0.001<0.001
CHOL (mmol/L)4.85 ± 0.96a,c4.99 ± 1.035.11 ± 1.03<0.001<0.001
SBP (mmHg)123.43 ± 15.40a,c130.58 ± 16.13b136.16 ± 18.89<0.001<0.001
DBP (mmHg)76.72 ± 10.13a,c76.69 ± 10.50b82.02 ± 11.70<0.001<0.001
baPWV (cm/s)1424.36 ± 272.94a,c1561.87 ± 330.39b1657.71 ± 327.62<0.001<0.001
INS011.60 ± 7.2612.40 ± 8.5213.73 ± 9.61<0.001<0.001
INS3071.56 ± 54.28c71.59 ± 56.57b44.70 ± 40.01<0.001<0.001
INS12048.74 ± 39.30a,c90.37 ± 69.9089.60 ± 65.86<0.001<0.001

BMI: body mass index, WHR: waist-hip ratio, FPG: fasting plasma glucose, HDL: high-density lipoprotein, LDL: low-density lipoprotein, TG: triglyceride, CHOL: cholesterol, SBP: systolic blood pressure, and DBP: diastolic blood pressure.
INS0: fasting serum insulin, INS30: 30-minute serum insulin, INS120: 120-minute serum insulin, HbA1c: hemoglobin A1c, and baPWV: brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity.
aNGT versus Pre-DM, .
bPre-DM versus DM, .
cNGT versus DM, .
3.2. Relationship between baPWV and Other Variables

Multiple regression analyses were performed to determine the relationship between each variable and baPWV value for the overall population and for the groups subdivided according to BP. Table 2 shows that age ( , ), working heart rate (WHR) ( , ), heart rate (HR) ( , , SBP ( , ), TG ( , ) levels, and 2 h plasma glucose levels ( , ) were positively associated with baPWV, while BMI ( , ) was negatively associated with baPWV. After dividing the subjects into two groups, the result displays that besides the aforementioned variables, HDL ( , ) levels were also associated with baPWV when BP was normal. In contrast, only age ( , ), BMI ( , ), HR ( , ), SBP ( , ), and TG ( , ) levels were still significantly related to baPWV in the individuals with hypertension.


The whole population Normotension Hypertension
Beta (95% CI) Beta (95% CI) Beta (95% CI)

Age0.355 (0.323–0.378)<0.0010.312 (0.285–0.340)<0.0010.523 (0.440–0.606)<0.001
BMI−0.086 (−1.116–0.057)<0.001−0.060 (−0.090–−0.030)<0.001−0.149 (−0.233–−0.065)0.007
WHR0.078 (0.047–0.109)<0.0010.075 (0.044–0.106)<0.001NS
HR0.171 (0.145–0.197)<0.0010.147 (0.121–0.174)<0.0010.243 (0.172–0.315)<0.001
SBP0.489 (0.449–0.529)<0.0010.403 (0.348–0.457)<0.0010.474 (0.356–0.539)<0.001
TG0.046 (0.011–0.081)0.0010.028 (−0.008–0.064)0.0570.097 (0.006–0.188)0.004
HDLNS−0.038 (−0.058–−0.018)0.037NS
2 h PG0.052 (0.013–0.090)0.0080.046 (0.006–0.087)<0.001NS
Adjusted 0.5240.4020.377

BMI: body mass index, WHR: waist-hip ratio, FPG: fasting plasma glucose, HDL: high-density lipoprotein, LDL: low-density lipoprotein, TG: triglyceride, CHOL: cholesterol, SBP: systolic blood pressure, and DBP: diastolic blood pressure.
INS0: fasting serum insulin, INS30: 30-minute serum insulin, INS120: 120-minute serum insulin.
NS: nonsignificant.
Only significant correlations are listed.
3.3. Association between baPWV and Glucose Status in Individuals with or without Hypertension

We divided the subjects with different BPs into subgroups on the basis of diagnostic criteria or HbA1c levels, which represent glucose control in the last 3 months. With regard to the normotensive individuals, after adjustment for age, gender, BMI, lipids levels, HR, SBP, DBP and WHR, Figure 1(a) shows that the pre-DM group had a higher baPWV compared with the NGT group ( ), while the DM group had the highest baPWV among the three groups (NGT versus DM, ; pre-DM versus DM, ). When the diagnostic criteria were replaced by HbA1c levels, similar differences were found among the three groups. However, the difference between the NGT and pre-DM groups was not significant (NGT versus pre-DM, ). On the other hand, no differences were observed for the hypertensive individuals, irrespective of the glucose metabolism status.

3.4. Independent Association of baPWV with the Indices of IR, Insulin Sensitivity, and Beta-Cell Function

As shown in Table 3, the Matsuda index ( , ) and HOMA-β ( , ) were negatively correlated with baPWV after adjustment for age, gender, BMI, WHR, lipids, HR, and MAP, while lnHOMA-IR ( , ) and QUICKI ( , ) showed a borderline negative correlation with baPWV. Only Matsudas index was weakly but significantly associated with baPWV in the hypertensive group ( , ).


Normotensive Hypertensive
Beta Adjusted Beta Adjusted

Model 1, age, gender adjusted

InHOMA-IR0.508<0.0010.2610.4030.1200.198
 QUICKI0.532<0.0010.3830.153
 Matsuda−0.226<0.001−0.0860.195
 HOMA-β−0.131<0.001−0.0690.141

Model 2, model 1 + BMI, WHR, HR, and MAP

InHOMA-IR0.2570.0430.3780.3690.1250.337
 QUICKI0.2230.0230.4560.067
 Matsuda−0.131<0.001−0.1430.023
 HOMA-β−0.088<0.001−0.0090.839

Model 3, model 2 + LIPIDS

InHOMA-IR0.1960.0760.3800.3390.1600.341
 QUICKI0.2260.0460.4300.084
 Matsuda−0.114<0.001−0.1260.046
 HOMA-β−0.082<0.001−0.0050.903

HOMA-IR: homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance, QUICKI: Quantitative Insulin Sensitivity Check Index.
HOMA-IR was log-transformed for comparison.

We further selected individuals with NGT from the normotensive population and grouped them according to the quartile of the Matsuda index. BaPWV significantly decreased with an increase in insulin sensitivity ( ) (Figure 2).

4. Discussion

In the present study that involved individuals with no history of diabetes or hypertensive medication, 2 h glucose was positively and independently associated with baPWV, even after adjusting for confounding factors such as age, BP, and lipid profile. These data are in agreement with a number of studies. In a study based on five cohorts of Asian origin, postchallenge glucose was found to be an independent predictor of CVD, and 2 h plasma glucose levels were a superior predictor of immature death compared with FPG levels [18]. Similarly, a study involving a nondiabetic population demonstrated that 2 h plasma glucose levels were more strongly associated with cardiometabolic risk factors and subclinical atherosclerosis compared with FPG or HbA1c levels [7].

Hypertension is one of the major risk factors for arterial stiffness, and previous studies [2022] have shown that PWV was higher in hypertensive individuals than in individuals with normal BP. However, previous studies have rarely focused on the interaction of hypertension and glucose metabolism with baPWV. To investigate whether an association exists between 2 h glucose levels and baPWV among individuals with different BP conditions, we divided the subjects into two groups on the basis of the diagnosis of hypertension. Separate analysis of the population via multiple linear stepwise analysis, including compounding variables, revealed that 2 h glucose levels were related to baPWV in the normal group but not in the hypertensive group. To further investigate the influence of glucose metabolism and glycemic control on PWV in the normal and hypertensive population, we classified them on the basis of diabetes diagnostic criteria and HbA1c levels. After adjustment for age, gender, BMI, lipid levels, SBP, DBP, WHR, and HR, baPWV in the normotensive group was closely related to different glucose metabolism conditions and glycemic control, whereas glucose status, whether normal or pathological, rarely affected arterial stiffness in hypertensive individuals.

In hypertensive individuals, BP was the main determinant of baPWV despite abnormal glucose status; therefore, the condition of blood vessels may benefit more from intensive antihypertensive treatment than from blood glucose control. This hypothesis is supported by several previous studies. Tomita et al. [23] demonstrated that arterial stiffness was more directly related to BP than to blood glucose levels. The UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) followed 1148 hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes for an average of 8.4 years and observed that tight BP control rather than tight blood sugar control achieved a clinically important reduction in the risk of macrovascular and microvascular complications [24]. Another study by Czernichow et al. [25] demonstrated that BP was the most important metabolic syndrome component in relation to the structure and function of large arteries, thus reflecting our results and emphasizing the importance of BP control in arterial stiffness. Although there are many pharmacological strategies to reduce arterial stiffness, antihypertensive treatment seems to be the most powerful therapy at present [26].

Although our data corroborates those from a majority of previous studies, some controversial results do exist. Bruno et al. [1] recently demonstrated that PWV was significantly higher in hypertensive individuals with diabetes than in hypertensive individuals with normal glucose status. In a study involving 1375 never-treated hypertensive subjects, an association between arterial stiffness and glucose tolerance existed [27]. However, it is noteworthy that these studies did not exclude patients with a history of diabetes or antidiabetic treatment, and this may have affected the results. Moreover, Chen et al. [28] showed that PWV increased with the duration of diabetes in individuals with or without hypertension, suggesting that arterial stiffness gradually worsened with a longer duration of diabetes, which was likely to be another reason for the differences detected in our study that involved patients with no history of diabetes.

The euglycemic hyperinsulinemia clamp studies have proved that 2 h glucose levels are associated with peripheral IR [29], which had an unclear contribution to arterial stiffness. Although many studies concluded that IR was associated with arterial stiffness [3032], Okada et al. [33] claimed that low insulin levels, which indicate high insulin sensitivity, were also linked to the occurrence of atherosclerosis. Nevertheless, previous studies have not clearly demonstrated whether IR is associated with increased arterial stiffness independent of the clusters of other risk factors. Therefore, we explored the possibility that insulin-sensitivity may influence arterial stiffness in patients with different BP levels. Because HOMA-IR was only based on fasting glucose and insulin levels, we used the Matsuda index as well, which represents whole-body insulin sensitivity in the basal state and after the ingestion of a glucose load. Indeed, our analysis of the normotensive population found a strong association between decreased insulin sensitivity and baPWV, independent of other metabolic factors. However, only the Matsuda index was weakly but significantly associated with baPWV, making it difficult to conclude that IR was an independent risk factor in hypertensive patients.

Moreover, we estimated the association between baPWV and beta-cell function. To our knowledge, the relationship between beta-cell function and arterial stiffness has not been previously explored. Curtis et al. [34] demonstrated that beta-cell function, evaluated by HOMA-β, was a significant predictor of incident cardiovascular events, which could be the outcome of arterial stiffness. In our study, HOMA-β was significantly correlated with baPWV after adjustment for metabolic factors. Another novel aspect of our study is that not only individuals with diabetes but also those with IR in the absence of diabetes and hypertension are at risk of arterial stiffness. These results suggest that the influence of IR on arterial stiffness is independent of glucose tolerance status. Several clinical studies also support our conclusion to some extent. Insulin sensitizing agents significantly decreased both PWV [35, 36] and IMT [37] of the carotid artery of type 2 diabetes patients, irrespective of their glucose-lowering effects.

The mechanism linking IR and arterial stiffness is not completely understood. Chronic hyperinsulinemia accentuates the activity of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone axis as well as the expression of angiotensin type 2 receptors in vascular tissue, leading to wall hypertrophy and fibrosis [38, 39]. In addition, IR causes decreased release of nitric oxide and dilation of vasculature, thereby increasing the possibility of damage to the vessel wall [40].

The influence of 30 min or 1 h glucose levels on arterial stiffness has not been clearly defined. In a study from Korea [9], 30 min postchallenge glucose levels, in contrast to FPG and 2 h glucose levels, were a weak but significant determinant of mean baPWV. However, this outcome was not reported in our study. This discrepancy may be due to the different population between studies; the Korean study selected individuals with impaired FPG and acute glucose excursion worse than those seen in the general population.

The role of BMI in hardening of arteries remains controversial, as Tomiyama et al. [41] showed that BMI was positively associated with PWV while Tomiyama et al. [15] and Li et al. [42] reported opposite results. Our findings were consistent with the latter study, where the colinearity between BMI and other cardiovascular risk factors may lead to the negative association. With regard to lipid metabolism, we found that TG and HDL levels were related to baPWV in individuals without hypertension. Only TG levels remained associated with baPWV in the hypertensive group, a finding consistent with that of previous reports [43, 44].

There were limitations to our study. First, because it is a cross-sectional research study, we cannot draw causal conclusions on blood glucose and PWV. Second, OGTT and the insulin index used were not the gold standard to diagnose IR. Third, we evaluated an exclusively Chinese population; therefore, the conclusions may not be applicable to other ethnic groups.

Nonetheless, our study was the first, as per our knowledge, to gauge the impact of glucose metabolism on baPWV in patients with different BP levels. Overall, our data indicated that baPWV was significantly associated with 2 h glucose levels in normotensive individuals, which may be connected with insulin sensitivity. In hypertensive individuals, BP was the dominant factor influencing arterial stiffness; neither glucose level nor islet function had a strong impact on baPWV, suggesting that intensive antihypertensive treatment may be more effective than glycemic control in reducing the incidence of cardiovascular events in these patients. Individuals with abnormal insulin sensitivity are also at increased risk of arterial stiffness, even in the absence of diabetes and hypertension.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.

Authors’ Contributions

C. Meng and M. Sun have contributed equally to this work.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the staff from Health Bureau of Gulou District for their assistance in data and specimen collection. The guidance on data analysis by Professor Rongbin Yu is also appreciated.

References

  1. R. M. Bruno, G. Penno, G. Daniele et al., “Type 2 diabetes mellitus worsens arterial stiffness in hypertensive patients through endothelial dysfunction,” Diabetologia, vol. 55, pp. 1847–1855, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  2. H. Ohnishi, S. Saitoh, S. Takagi et al., “Pulse wave velocity as an indicator of atherosclerosis in impaired fasting glucose: the tanno and sobetsu study,” Diabetes Care, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 437–440, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. M. T. Schram, R. M. A. Henry, R. A. J. M. van Dijk et al., “Increased central artery stiffness in impaired glucose metabolism and type 2 diabetes: the hoorn study,” Hypertension, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 176–181, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. S. Rahman, A. A. S. Ismail, S. B. Ismail, N. N. Naing, and A. R. A. Rahman, “Early manifestation of macrovasculopathy in newly diagnosed never treated type II diabetic patients with no traditional CVD risk factors,” Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice, vol. 80, no. 2, pp. 253–258, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. M. V. P. Nicole, “Impaired fasting glucose is associated with increased arterial stiffness in elderly people without diabetes mellitus: the Rotterdam Study,” Just Another Gibbs Sampler, vol. 54, pp. 397–404, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
  6. J. Liang, N. Zhou, F. Teng et al., “Hemoglobin A1c levels and aortic arterial stiffness: the Cardiometabolic Risk in Chinese (CRC) Study,” PLoS ONE, vol. 7, Article ID e38485, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  7. M. A. Marini, E. Succrro, E. Castaldo et al., “Cardiometabolic risk profiles and carotid atherosclerosis in individuals with prediabetes identified by fasting glucose, postchallenge glucose, and hemoglobin A1c criteria,” Diabetes Care, vol. 35, pp. 1144–1149, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  8. T. Nakagami, “Hyperglycaemia and mortality from all causes and from cardiovascular disease in five populations of Asian origin,” Diabetologia, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 385–394, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. E. S. Choi, E. J. Rhee, J. H. Choi et al., “The association of brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity with 30-minute post-challenge plasma glucose levels in Korean adults with no history of type 2 diabetes,” Korean Diabetes Journal, vol. 34, pp. 287–293, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  10. E. Succurro, M. A. Marini, F. Arturi et al., “Elevated one-hour post-load plasma glucose levels identifies subjects with normal glucose tolerance but early carotid atherosclerosis,” Atherosclerosis, vol. 207, no. 1, pp. 245–249, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. A. Sciacqua, R. Maio, S. Miceli et al., “Association between one-hour post-load plasma glucose levels and vascular stiffness in essential hypertension,” PLoS ONE, vol. 7, Article ID e44470, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  12. M. A. Tedesco, F. Natale, G. Di Salvo, S. Caputo, M. Capasso, and R. Calabró, “Effects of coexisting hypertension and type II diabetes mellitus on arterial stiffness,” Journal of Human Hypertension, vol. 18, no. 7, pp. 469–473, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. E. D. Lehmann, “Clinical value of aortic pulse-wave velocity measurement,” The Lancet, vol. 354, no. 9178, pp. 528–529, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. A. Yamashina, H. Tomiyama, T. Arai et al., “Brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity as a marker of atherosclerotic vascular damage and cardiovascular risk,” Hypertension Research, vol. 26, no. 8, pp. 615–622, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. H. Tomiyama, A. Yamashina, T. Arai et al., “Influences of age and gender on results of noninvasive brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity measurement: a survey of 12 517 subjects,” Atherosclerosis, vol. 166, no. 2, pp. 303–309, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. S. Laurent, P. Boutouyrie, R. Asmar et al., “Aortic stiffness is an independent predictor of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in hypertensive patients,” Hypertension, vol. 37, no. 5, pp. 1236–1241, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  17. F. Wang, P. Ye, L. Luo et al., “Association of serum lipids with arterial stiffness in a population-based study in Beijing,” European Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 41, no. 9, pp. 929–936, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. M. Matsuda and R. A. DeFronzo, “Insulin sensitivity indices obtained from oral glucose tolerance testing: comparison with the euglycemic insulin clamp,” Diabetes Care, vol. 22, no. 9, pp. 1462–1470, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. A. Katz, S. S. Nambi, K. Mather et al., “Quantitative insulin sensitivity check index: a simple, accurate method for assessing insulin sensitivity in humans,” Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 85, no. 7, pp. 2402–2410, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. B. Li, H. Gao, X. Li, Y. Liu, and M. Wang, “Correlation between brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity and arterial compliance and cardiovascular risk factors in elderly paients with arteriosclerosis,” Hypertension Research, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 309–314, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. J. Ishikawa, K. Kario, Y. Matsui et al., “Collagen metabolism in extracellular matrix may be involved in arterial stiffness in older hypertensive patients with left ventricular hypertrophy,” Hypertension Research, vol. 28, no. 12, pp. 995–1001, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. B. Athanase, A. Chris, M. B. Jeanne et al., “Determinants of accelerated progression of arterial stiffness in normotensive subjects and in treated hypertensive subjects over a 6-year period,” Circulation, vol. 105, no. 10, pp. 1202–1207, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. H. Tomita, R. Kawamoto, Y. Tabara, T. Miki, and K. Kohara, “Blood pressure is the main determinant of the reflection wave in patients with type 2 diabetes,” Hypertension Research, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 493–499, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. UK Prospective Diabetes Study Group, “Tight blood pressure control and risk of macrovascular and microvascular complications in type 2 diabetes: UKPDS 38,” British Medical Journal, vol. 317, pp. 703–713, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  25. S. Czernichow, S. Bertrais, J. Blacher et al., “Metabolic syndrome in relation to structure and function of large arteries: a predominant effect of blood pressure—a report from the SU.VI.MAX. vascular study,” American Journal of Hypertension, vol. 18, no. 9, pp. 1154–1160, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. C. D. A. Stehouwer, R. M. A. Henry, and I. Ferreira, “Arterial stiffness in diabetes and the metabolic syndrome: a pathway to cardiovascular disease,” Diabetologia, vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 527–539, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. G. Vyssoulis, P. Pietri, C. Vlachopoulos et al., “Early adverse effect of abnormal glucose metabolism on arterial stiffness in drug naïve hypertensive patients,” Diabetes & Vascular Disease Research, vol. 9, pp. 18–24, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  28. Y. Chen, Y. Huang, X. Li et al., “Association of arterial stiffness with HbA1c in 1,000 type 2 diabetic patients with or without hypertension,” Endocrine, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 262–267, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  29. C. Meyer, W. Pimenta, H. J. Woerle et al., “Different mechanisms for impaired fasting glucose and impaired postprandial glucose tolerance in humans,” Diabetes Care, vol. 29, no. 8, pp. 1909–1914, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. R. L. Pande, T. S. Perlstein, J. A. Beckman, and M. A. Creager, “Association of insulin resistance and inflammation with peripheral arterial disease: the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1999 to 2004,” Circulation, vol. 118, no. 1, pp. 33–41, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. T. W. Hansen, J. Jeppesen, S. Rasmussen, H. Ibsen, and C. Torp-Pedersen, “Relation between insulin and aortic stiffness: a population-based study,” Journal of Human Hypertension, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 1–7, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. S. Gotoh, Y. Doi, J. Hata et al., “Insulin resistance and the development of cardiovascular disease in a Japanese community: the Hisayama Study,” Journal of Atherosclerosis and Thrombosis, vol. 19, pp. 977–985, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  33. H. Okada, M. Fukui, M. Tanaka et al., “Low insulin level is associated with aortic stiffness,” Hypertension Research, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 336–340, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. L. H. Curtis, B. G. Hammill, M. A. Bethel et al., “Pancreatic beta-cell function as a predictor of cardiovascular outcomes and costs: findings from the Cardiovascular Health Study,” Current Medical Research & Opinion, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 41–50, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  35. N. Satoh, Y. Ogawa, T. Usui et al., “Antiatherogenic effect of pioglitazone in type 2 diabetic patients irrespective of the responsiveness to its antidiabetic effect,” Diabetes Care, vol. 26, no. 9, pp. 2493–2499, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. E. Sofera, M. Boazb, and Z. Matas, “Treatment with insulin sensitizer metformin improves arterial properties, metabolic parameters, and liver function in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial,” Metabolism, vol. 60, pp. 1278–1284, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  37. J. Minamikawa, S. Tanaka, M. Yamauchi, D. Inoue, and H. Koshiyama, “Potent inhibitory effect of troglitazone on carotid arterial wall thickness in type 2 diabetes,” Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 83, no. 5, pp. 1818–1820, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. S. Jesmin, I. Sakuma, Y. Hattori, and A. Kitabatake, “Role of angiotensin II in altered expression of molecules responsible for coronary matrix remodeling in insulin-resistant diabetic rats,” Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, vol. 23, no. 11, pp. 2021–2026, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. G. Nickenig, J. Röling, K. Strehlow, P. Schnabel, and M. Böhm, “Insulin induces upregulation of vascular receptor gene expression by posttranscriptional mechanisms,” Circulation, vol. 98, no. 22, pp. 2453–2460, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  40. M. Montagnani and M. J. Quon, “Insulin action in vascular endothelium: potential mechanisms linking insulin resistance with hypertension,” Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism, vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 285–292, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. H. Tomiyama, A. Yamashina, T. Arai et al., “Influences of age and gender on results of noninvasive brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity measurement—a survey of 12 517 subjects,” Atherosclerosis, vol. 166, no. 2, pp. 303–309, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. C. H. Li, J. S. Wu, Y. C. Yang et al., “Increased arterial stiffness in subjects with impaired glucose tolerance and newly diagnosed diabetes but not isolated impaired fasting glucose,” The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, vol. 97, pp. 658–662, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  43. J. Amar, J. B. Ruidavets, B. Chamontin, L. Drouet, and J. Ferrières, “Arterial stiffness and cardiovascular risk factors in a population-based study,” Journal of Hypertension, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 381–387, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. L. Xu, C. Q. Jiang, T. H. Lam et al., “Brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity and cardiovascular risk factors in the non-diabetic and newly diagnosed diabetic Chinese: guangzhou Biobank Cohort Study-CVD,” Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 133–139, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2013 Chuchen Meng et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

1133 Views | 663 Downloads | 5 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly and safely as possible. Any author submitting a COVID-19 paper should notify us at help@hindawi.com to ensure their research is fast-tracked and made available on a preprint server as soon as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted articles related to COVID-19.