Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Food Quality
Volume 2018 (2018), Article ID 2163526, 12 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/2163526
Research Article

Food Integrity and Food Technology Concerns in Canada: Evidence from Two Public Surveys

1Department of Resource Economics and Environmental Sociology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
2Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Wisconsin-River Falls, River Falls, WI, USA

Correspondence should be addressed to Albert Boaitey; ac.atreblau@yetiaob

Received 12 August 2017; Revised 14 October 2017; Accepted 8 January 2018; Published 8 February 2018

Academic Editor: Anca Ioana Nicolau

Copyright © 2018 Ellen Goddard et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. P. Mohr and S. Golley, “Responses to GM food content in context with food integrity issues: Results from Australian population surveys,” New Biotechnology, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 91–98, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. R. H. Stadler, L.-A. Tran, C. Cavin, P. Zbinden, and E. J. M. Konings, “Analytical approaches to verify food integrity: Needs and challenges,” Journal of AOAC International, vol. 99, no. 5, pp. 1135–1144, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. D. Herath, “Evolving consumer acceptance of biotechnology applications in Canada: Evidence from the public opinion surveys in 2001 (fifth wave) and 2011 (seventh wave),” in Proceedings of the 2013 Annual Meeting, No. 150525. Agricultural and Applied Economics Association., Washington, DC, USA, August, 2013, https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/bitstream/150525/2/Herath8_1AAEA.pdf.
  4. A. Pascalev, “You are what you eat: Genetically modified foods, integrity, and society,” Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 583–594, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. M. Connor and M. Siegrist, “Factors influencing people's acceptance of gene technology: The role of knowledge, health expectations, naturalness, and social trust,” Science Communication, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 514–538, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. T. C. Earle, “Trust in risk management: A model-based review of empirical research,” Risk Analysis, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 541–574, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. A. H. Matin, E. Goddard, F. Vandermoere et al., “Do environmental attitudes and food technology neophobia affect perceptions of the benefits of nanotechnology?” International Journal of Consumer Studies, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 149–157, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. J. Roosen, A. Bieberstein, S. Blanchemanche, E. Goddard, S. Marette, and F. Vandermoere, “Trust and willingness to pay for nanotechnology food,” Food Policy, vol. 52, pp. 75–83, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. M. Siegrist, M.-E. Cousin, H. Kastenholz, and A. Wiek, “Public acceptance of nanotechnology foods and food packaging: The influence of affect and trust,” Appetite, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 459–466, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. F. Vandermoere, S. Blanchemanche, A. Bieberstein, S. Marette, and J. Roosen, “The public understanding of nanotechnology in the food domain: The hidden role of views on science, technology, and nature,” Public Understanding of Science, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 195–206, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. E. L. Glaeser, D. I. Laibson, J. A. Scheinkman, and C. L. Soutter, “Measuring trust,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 115, no. 3, pp. 811–846, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. V. Corral-Verdugo, G. Carrus, M. Bonnes, G. Moser, and J. B. P. Sinha, “Environmental beliefs and endorsement of sustainable development principles in water conservation: Toward a new human interdependence paradigm scale,” Environment and Behavior, vol. 40, no. 5, pp. 703–725, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. L. Steg and I. Sievers, “Cultural theory and individual perceptions of environmental risks,” Environment and Behavior, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 250–269, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. K. Roininen, L. Lähteenmäki, and H. Tuorila, “Quantification of consumer attitudes to health and hedonic characteristics of foods,” Appetite, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 71–88, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. K. Roininen, H. Tuorila, E. H. Zandstra et al., “Differences in health and taste attitudes and reported behaviour among finnish, Dutch and British consumers: A cross-national validation of the health and taste attitude scales (HTAS),” Appetite, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 33–45, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. J. A. Kleboth, P. A. Luning, and V. Fogliano, “Risk-based integrity audits in the food chain – A framework for complex systems,” Trends in Food Science & Technology, vol. 56, pp. 167–174, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. C. Elliott, Elliott Review into the Integrity and Assurance of Food Supply Networks-Final Report: A National Food Crime Prevention Framework, Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs Food Standards Agency, 2014.
  18. K. H. Tan, M. H. Ali, Z. M. Makhbul, and A. Ismail, “The impact of external integration on halal food integrity,” Supply Chain Management Review, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 186–199, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. D. I. Ellis and R. Goodacre, “Detecting food authenticity and integrity,” Analytical Methods, vol. 8, no. 16, pp. 3281–3283, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. C.-S. Wang, D. D. Van Fleet, and A. K. Mishra, “Food integrity: a market-based solution,” British Food Journal, vol. 119, no. 1, pp. 7–19, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. L. Xu, X.-S. Fu, H.-Y. Fu, and Y.-B. She, “Rapid Detection of Exogenous Adulterants and Species Discrimination for a Chinese Functional Tea (Banlangen) by Fourier-Transform Near-Infrared (FT-NIR) Spectroscopy and Chemometrics,” Journal of Food Quality, vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 450–457, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. A. Di Pinto, M. C. Conversano, V. T. Forte, L. Novello, and G. M. Tantillo, “Detection of cow milk in buffalo "Mozzarella" by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay,” Journal of Food Quality, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 428–435, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. R. M. W. Yeung and J. Morris, “Food safety risk: Consumer perception and purchase behaviour,” British Food Journal, vol. 103, no. 3, pp. 170–187, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. L. Fassam and S. Dani, “A conceptual understanding of criminality and integrity challenges in food supply chains,” British Food Journal, vol. 119, no. 1, pp. 67–83, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. C. Donaldson, “Food fraud: Ensuring the integrity of our food supply,” Perspectives in Public Health, vol. 134, no. 6, p. 311, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. R. K. Davidson, W. Antunes, E. H. Madslien et al., “From food defence to food supply chain integrity,” British Food Journal, vol. 119, no. 1, pp. 52–66, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. G. T. Tonsor, T. C. Schroeder, and J. M. E. Pennings, “Factors impacting food safety risk perceptions,” Journal of Agricultural Economics, vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 625–644, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus