Research Article
Physicochemical and Sensory Properties of Broiler Chicken Breast Meat Stored Frozen and Thawed Using Various Methods
Table 5
Results of sensory assessment of breast meat with regard to the duration of freezing storage and methods of thawing.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Note. ± s: arithmetic mean ± standard deviation; a: atmospheric air (); w: water (); m: microwave oven (). a,bValues in rows with different letters differ significantly . x,yValues in columns with different letters differ highly significantly . Sensory scale: odour–flavour intensity: 1 = negatively changed, 2 = moderately changed, 3 = typical, weak, 4 = typical, strong, 5 = typical, very strong; odour–flavour desirability: 1 = not desirable, 2 = fairly desirable, 3 = desirable, 4 = very desirable, 5 = highly desirable; juiciness: 1 = very dry, 2 = dry, 3 = slightly juicy, 4 = juicy, 5 = very juicy; tenderness: 1 = very hard, 2 = hard, 3 = slightly tender, 4 = tender, 5 = very tender. |