Research Article
Effects of Partial Replacement of Pork Meat with Chicken or Duck Meat on the Texture, Flavor, and Consumer Acceptance of Sausage
Table 4
Mean intensities of 15 descriptive attributes for sausages substituted with chicken, duck, and beef.
| | Sample | Control | C05 | C10 | C20 | C30 | D05 | D10 | D20 | D30 |
| Appearance | | 2.9 | 3.1 | 2.6 | 2.5 | 2.8 | 2.8 | 2.5 | 2.6 | 2.8 | Taste and flavor | Sweetness | 2.8 ns | 3.0 | 2.7 | 2.8 | 3.1 | 2.8 | 2.8 | 2.8 | 2.5 | Saltiness | 8.9 ns | 8.3 | 9.1 | 8.8 | 7.5 | 8.3 | 8.0 | 8.6 | 8.1 | Sourness | 1.8 ns | 1.8 | 2.0 | 1.8 | 2.2 | 1.9 | 1.8 | 1.8 | 1.8 | Umami | 7.0 ns | 7.7 | 7.8 | 7.3 | 7.6 | 6.8 | 8.2 | 6.9 | 6.9 | Meat flavor | 8.0 ns | 8.0 | 8.1 | 7.9 | 7.6 | 7.8 | 7.8 | 7.4 | 7.8 | Sausage spice | 10.0 ns | 9.8 | 9.5 | 9.5 | 9.4 | 9.3 | 9.2 | 9.0 | 9.1 | Rancid flavor | 1.8 ns | 1.8 | 1.7 | 1.8 | 2.3 | 2.0 | 1.5 | 1.6 | 1.7 | Texture and mouthfeel | Hardness | 10.0 a(3) | 9.2 ab | 8.6 abc | 7.2 bc | 6.4 c | 8.1 abc | 7.5 bc | 6.8 bc | 6.2 c | Springiness | 9.2 a | 8.7 ab | 8.5 ab | 7.3 abc | 5.8 c | 8.0 ab | 6.9 bc | 6.9 bc | 5.9 c | Cohesiveness | 6.1 ns | 5.8 | 5.6 | 5.9 | 5.1 | 5.8 | 5.7 | 5.3 | 5.7 | Chewiness | 8.3 a | 8.2 a | 7.7 ab | 6.9 ab | 6.2 b | 7.3 ab | 6.7 ab | 6.8 ab | 6.3 b | Juiciness | 9.7 ab | 9.6 b | 9.2 b | 9.2 d | 10.5 ab | 10.0 ab | 10.0 ab | 10.9 ab | 11.8 a | Oiliness | 7.0 ns | 6.5 | 6.7 | 7.0 | 7.3 | 6.9 | 7.3 | 7.1 | 6.7 |
|
|
: amount of fat globule. (2)“ns” means nonsignificant. characters within a row for chicken or duck mean significant difference at by Tukey’s test. |