Research Article

Quality and Acceptability of Fresh and Long-Term Frozen In-Bag Dry-Aged Lean Bull Beef

Table 6

Effect of ageing treatments and ageing time on Aw and surface microbial growth of fresh-and-never frozen in-bag dry-aged lean bull beef.

Attributes Ageing timeTreatmentsSED SA × AV
T1T2T3T4

Aw0 d0.992x0.993x0.994x0.992x0.0010.325
21 d0.987y0.987y0.988y0.986y
p ageing time0.0050.003

Microbial load (log cfu/g)
APC0 d4.21x2.623.092.74x0.610.281
21 d2.50y3.292.562.00y
p ageing time0.0380.4590.494
LAB0 d1.15ND1.50ND0.07
21 dNDNDNDND
p ageing time
Mould0 d1.39NDNDND0.05
21 dND1.00NDND
p ageing time
Yeast0 d2.21xND1.481.390.400.003
21 d4.06ay1.57b2.12b2.41b
p ageing time0.0070.2370.076
Enterobacteriaceae0 d3.161.841.381.710.71
21 dND2.69ND1.35
p ageing time
E. coli (MPN/g)0 d/21 dNDNDNDND

ND: not detected; BD: in-bag dry-ageing; W: wet-ageing; SA: stepwise ageing; AV: air velocity. T1: BD at 0.5 m·s−1 for 21 d; T2: BD at 0.5 m·s−1 7 d + W for 14 d; T3: BD at 1.5 m·s−1 for 7 d + W for 14 d; T4: BD at 2.5 m·s−1 for 7 d + W for 14 d. presented as for level of significance. Different letters of “x, y, or z” within the same column mean results are significantly different from each other (). Different letters of “a, b, or c” within the same row mean results are significantly different from each other ().