Research Article
Evaluation of Quality Parameters and Shelf Life of Thai Pork Scratching “Kaeb Moo”
Table 5
Regression equations derived from independent variables x in physical, chemical, and descriptive analysis to predict overall acceptance y of Kaeb Moo.
| Variables (x) | Overall acceptance (y) | Regression equations | Adjusted R2 | Significance level |
| T1 sample | | | | Moisture content | y = 8.20 – 0.19x + 0.12x2 | 0.978 | | MDA content | y = 7.52 + 2.54x − 18.62x2 | 0.999 | | Hexanal content | y = 16.02 – 62.09x + 81.48x2 | 0.984 | | Linear distance | y = 1.00 + 0.08x | 0.832 | | Descriptive analysis | | | | Rancidity | y = 7.93 – 0.06x | 0.943 | | Crispness | y = −9.82 + 0.56x − 0.01x2 | 0.974 | |
| T2 sample | | | | Moisture content | y = 5.83 + 1.35x − 0.43x2 | 0.981 | | MDA content | y = 8.60 – 7.16x | 0.967 | | Hexanal content | y = 9.70 – 16.61x + 8.40x2 | 0.992 | | Linear distance | y = −0.57 + 0.11x | 0.994 | | Descriptive analysis | | | | Rancidity | y = 7.67 – 0.06x | 0.999 | | Crispness | y = −2.87 + 0.18x | 0.947 | |
| T3 sample | | | | Moisture content | y = 10.08 – 1.73x | 0.917 | | MDA content | y = 10.00 – 12.63x | 0.922 | | Hexanal content | y = 8.91 – 12.05x + 4.14x2 | 0.986 | | Linear distance | y = −2.81 + 0.13x | 0.960 | | Descriptive analysis | | | | Rancidity | y = 7.52 – 0.07x | 0.941 | | Crispness | y = −4.93 + 0.22x | 0.999 | |
|
|