Research Article
Quantitative Detection of Beef and Beef Meat Products Adulteration by the Addition of Duck Meat Using Micro Drop Digital Polymerase Chain Reaction
Table 3
Detection by digital PCR of mixed samples with known adulteration ratios.
| Number | Duck mass (mg) | DNA copy number (copies/μL) | Average value(copies/μL) | Coefficient of variation (%) | Measured cassava mass (mg) | Relative error (%) |
| 1 | 5.0 | 481 | 495 | 491 | 489 ± 7.21 | 1.47 | 5.35 | 7 | 2 | 10.0 | 638 | 632 | 653 | 641 ± 10.82 | 1.69 | 9.40 | −6 | 3 | 15.0 | 849 | 860 | 856 | 855 ± 5.57 | 0.65 | 15.16 | 1.06 | 4 | 20.0 | 1094 | 1114 | 1101 | 1103 ± 10.15 | 0.92 | 21.80 | 9 | 5 | 25.0 | 1290 | 1276 | 1280 | 1282 ± 7.21 | 0.56 | 26.60 | 6.4 | 6 | 30.0 | 1379 | 1390 | 1395 | 1388 ± 8.19 | 0.59 | 29.44 | −1.86 | 7 | 35.0 | 1601 | 1623 | 1609 | 1611 ± 11.14 | 0.69 | 35.42 | 1.2 | 8 | 40.0 | 1889 | 1901 | 1892 | 1894 ± 6.24 | 0.33 | 42.98 | 7.45 | 9 | 45.0 | 1917 | 1888 | 1922 | 1909 ± 18.36 | 0.96 | 43.40 | −3.55 |
|
|
Note. Average values are provided as mean ± standard deviation.
|